TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

IMAHAIMNGTTA Archive

View 0 posts and 8 comments by IMAHAIMNGTTA on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Don't apologize for giving even more information and context, I should be the one thanking you (which I'll hereby do again). I think that the cases of incapacitation (where consent could not be given, so you don't fit the criterium of 'showing your unwillingness to participate' because there's no willing to begin with) and cases of a no (where you are showing your unwillingness to participate) seem like two totally different things, so I'm not sure if saying 'the legal standard is showing that y…
/r/MensRights19/07/16 03:09 PM
1

Granting that it doesn't say so explicitly, can't it still be a legal demand for conviction? Interpretation of legal norms and their content in jurisprudence often differs from a purely grammatical interpretation, and although the principle of legality gives less leeway for this kind of interpretation in criminal law, it still happens a lot that the system of the law or the practical interpretation of it in practice ends up different. At least, that's what I've noticed as a student of Dutch law.…
/r/MensRights19/07/16 01:10 PM
3

Thanks for the sources. I don't get why people downvote me for asking a pretty relevant question; I thought we were all about properly sourcing claims here. Anyway, he discussion has most people saying what the NTV reports says, which is reporting the court's claims. It's still noteworthy that there's apparently two videos of this and the people who claim to have watched those say that there's some iffy stuff there; but it's not to the point where I'm not going to trust the judge when she claims…
/r/MensRights19/07/16 12:34 PM
-7

From what I understood, this is because German rape law at the time was antiquated; because she did not violently resist it wasn't rape, which is why the Germans have implemented that new 'no means no' law. If so, this is not a men's rights issue and the feminists are right for once.* u/Mens-Advocate, could you link to your sources? Because the facts clearly matter for determining what happens in this case. *Apparently I need to explain this but I mean by this that if this was due to a definitio…
/r/MensRights19/07/16 11:46 AM
1

See, it's things like the absolute fascism of this post and 'She probably has the mental age of a teenager, as feminism has demonstrated.' that make us look awful. I don't mind a little harshness in tone, we're no safe space, but this post is a whole step beyond that. I know there should be no enemies to the MensRight, but this is WRONG. Feminists are what you consider 'people' with the qualities, such as variable intelligence and child-rearing skills, that comes with falling under the diverse u…
/r/MensRights07/02/16 11:49 AM
1

On the title: Not that the term lacks any merit, but isn't calling people white knights technically demonizing male sexuality and therefore man-shaming?
/r/MensRights12/11/15 02:30 PM
10

The problem is that the lesson from male-male and female-female relationships don't carry over to male-female relationships where male disposability will still be a thing, precisely because it is easy to judge men as equal to other men and women as equal to other women because they are but it's hard to fairly judge a man when the opponent is a woman. So no, I highly doubt it. The only thing that may raise and has raised awareness of these issues is women who make a lot of money being forced to g…
/r/MensRights29/06/15 06:39 AM
-9

So you're saying a decent portion of betas are actually extremely manly. Never change, TRP. Never change.
/r/TheRedPill13/06/15 03:58 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter