TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

IMULTRAHARDCORE Archive

View 10 posts and 393 comments by IMULTRAHARDCORE on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Here is a podcast interview with the father: https://lukemacias.com/afathersfight/
/r/MensRights22/10/19 09:43 PM
2

A Box of Chocolates
/r/PussyPass07/09/19 03:57 AM
0

I reject, utterly, the notion of my having an obligation to anyone by virtue of my conception or birth, acts with which I literally had nothing to do. Friend, I am not talking about your parents I am talking about your ancestors. The men and women who struggled in the cold winds of Europe to eke out a life and through thousands of difficult years rose to be the dominant power on the planet. They created cities, buildings of incomparable complexity and beauty. They made art and music which people…
/r/MGTOW13/05/18 07:07 AM
1

Which civilisation are you trying to save exactly? Western civilization, the greatest civilization humanity has ever known. You've lost. Not yet. I can appreciate the angst that this causes you personally but it's angst of your own making. It's caused because you still believe that there is some sort of meaning to all of this, that you and your genes have some sort of destiny or inherent worth, seemingly ignorant of the history of an uncaring universe, and especially a process so vicious and amo…
/r/MGTOW13/05/18 12:15 AM
-5

No one hates you. We just think you're wrong. No contact with women means no children, no children means our civilization ends. I understand that some MGTOW are bitter enough to allow that to happen, many have been taken to the cleaners and lost everything because of women and our female advantaged society, but that is the trap. Somehow we need to be able to end this sexual war and stop hating each other before we all lose everything.
/r/MGTOW12/05/18 04:11 PM
5

This seems like it would be a good post on /r/YourTaxDollarsAtWork as well.
/r/PussyPass05/04/18 03:37 AM
1

I haven't finished The Red Pill yet, only seen the first 20mins or so. But that might be a factor for sure.
/r/MensRights29/05/17 06:23 AM
1

Agreed on both counts.
/r/MensRights28/05/17 10:55 AM
3

Until she debunks the wage gap myth, brings up male genital mutilation in a serious discussion or touches one of many other important issues I expect this to happen in the coming months. If not then she's not as smart as I'm giving her credit for.
/r/MensRights28/05/17 10:31 AM
3

I think Laci Green is primarily concerned with self-promotion Exactly. I think if patting her on the back is all it takes for her to disavow some of her worst views publicly than it is a small price to pay. She is a top propagandist on Youtube and has poisoned the minds of many. Getting her to more or less "switch sides" is huge. Not only because the tone of her content will change but she will also put doubt into the minds of people she had previously convinced.
/r/MensRights28/05/17 09:22 AM
9

Fucking this. There's really only one choice when it comes down to it. I don't know why it's so hard for people to figure that out and make their choice.
/r/PussyPass27/04/17 02:55 PM
2

It's because the title is combative. You are not merely "pointing out the obvious" you were "dismayed" by it. That's going to set you at odds with people.
/r/MensRights12/12/15 05:52 AM
4

1) This is a natural extension given that Feminism has aligned itself with left wing politics. 2) If you have a problem with the way the MRM is "ran" start something yourself. No one owns the movement they only own their respective sites, blogs, youtube channels, etc.
/r/MensRights12/12/15 03:44 AM
2

Appreciate the spreading of info but don't like to that shits site. Archive it and repost it so he doesn't get traffic.
/r/MensRights31/10/15 10:31 PM
3

1st: It's a sad truth but you're going to need money to hire a lawyer. All isn't lost if you don't have one but things are so much better with a lawyer it may as well be a requirement. If you don't have the money find it. If you really can't find the money I'm sorry to say you probably wont get very far custody wise. 2nd: Unless your ex fucks up BIG you're not getting more than 50/50 and probably wont even get that. Even with a lawyer. No it's not fair. Men have killed themselves over this fact.…
/r/MensRights14/10/15 09:24 PM
3

https://archive.is/JwTVz Wow.
/r/MensRights14/07/15 01:18 AM
3

I support going dark in protest of the Admins recent actions.
/r/MensRights03/07/15 05:32 AM
18

Clear, tangible, direct benefit that isn't once in a lifetime thing. You know, getting cleared of crimes because I'm male and the like. Of course some will argue that it's already clear and tangibly directly benefiting me but I'm afraid to say that I must be blind because I don't see it in my day to day life.
/r/MensRights27/06/15 05:03 PM
2

High school but it's probably a good idea to keep your head down in college as well.
/r/MensRights20/06/15 10:33 PM
7

I am not in favor of putting kids and teens at the forefront of this battle. Feminist backlash can be vicious in the best of circumstances and it's not right to push someone into sacrificing their future for advocacy when if they waited just a few years they could at least finish their education without fear and then advocate how they want. Students should focus on school.
/r/MensRights20/06/15 06:13 PM
1

Wouldn't describe that as "glowingly" but it's sure not negative either.
/r/MensRights20/06/15 04:16 PM
15

In all honesty keep your head down and finish school first. Doing advocacy while in school is a bad idea. It makes you a target.
/r/MensRights20/06/15 10:12 AM
0

There's a special place in hell for whoever came up with the idea to clickbait Father's Day in order to manufacture outrage to sell fucking toilet paper.
/r/MensRights17/06/15 05:47 AM
1

IIRC her name is Chanty Binx or something like that. She's known as Big Red.
/r/MensRights10/06/15 11:53 AM
1

np
/r/MensRights24/05/15 08:45 PM
3

I don't know if you don't spend a lot of time on chans or if you're just lazy OP but here I uploaded the image to imgur for you for when the thread 404s. http://i.imgur.com/RzxWuUT.jpg
/r/MensRights24/05/15 08:41 PM
1

This would be a monumental project, much larger in scope than Deepfreeze which focuses mainly on games journalism. You'd be cataloging mainstream media which is a very broad spectrum of outlets and topics. I wish anyone well who tries to undertake this but I'm not optimistic that it can be done without a lot of support.
/r/MensRights21/05/15 03:18 PM
2

it's talking about men and boys and their problems Which will all stem from feminism, Marxism, and lefty Democrats I guarantee you. They will not speak about gynocentrism. Or are you predisposed to believe conservatives would never support men at all? Not at all, I consider myself very far to the right. But IMHO PJ Media is not "those types" of conservatives. and I don't believe they are hardcore gynocentrists that want to enslave men. I don't believe that that's their actual intentions. As the …
/r/MensRights11/05/15 10:44 PM
2

This is surely an anti feminist piece not a pro male piece. Don't be fooled into thinking they are one and the same. The end goal of the people supporting this is to have men as virtual slaves while women stay at home raising children. I like PJ Media and Bill Whittle especially but it's important to take note of where they really stand on men's rights. They're pro male as far as not demonizing masculinity but they would perpetuate gynocentrism if they could and that is not really pro male at al…
/r/MensRights11/05/15 09:19 AM
1

My friend gets to see his daughter next saturday and she is currently in love with bubbles so this is perfect. Right now he only gets to see her 7 hours a week and every other weekend. Parental Alienation is something I'm very worried for on his behalf but he's going to court soon to try to get more time. This is a real issue that deserves more recognition.
/r/MensRights19/04/15 05:11 PM
1

That's not racist. Only someone who's hypersensitive would be offended.
/r/MensRights19/04/15 06:53 AM
3

RBK usually copies his videos to his blog if you don't want to listen to the TTS voice.
/r/MensRights26/02/15 10:49 AM
8

Honestly, just lurk this subreddit and you'll come across a lot of useful stuff. If you want to immerse yourself ASAP I recommend youtube videos. Check out Girlwriteswhat, Spetsnaz, Razorbladekandy, Manwomanmyth, and Sparkyfister for starters. They all take a very different approach to video making so find the one that suits you best. Also it should be noted Manwomanmyth no longer makes videos under that account but his best stuff is still there to watch.
/r/MensRights20/02/15 08:30 AM
0

Is Meninist actually a term people are using now? Bleh.
/r/MensRights07/02/15 05:24 AM
11

This. Never underestimate an angry woman.
/r/MensRights03/02/15 11:40 AM
1

Well it's impossible to know who was posting on 4chan. It could have been Anita or it could have been a friend or just a fan. All we know is that someone was promoting her on 4chan at the time her kickstarter was open.
/r/MensRights11/01/15 06:02 AM
1

I'm sorry, which reference? I don't understand.
/r/MensRights11/01/15 04:19 AM
1

Yeah, it has. You're just being a bullheaded ideologue who doesn't want to give an inch. You can no longer claim ignorance, at least not honestly. Someone who doesn't allow comments on any of her videos suddenly allows comments and shills their controversial shit on the known hub of internet trolls? That's someone looking for harassment so they can turn around and make a buck off the poor me act. Thinking it's anything else is turning a blind eye to facts. You may as well join a cult if you're g…
/r/MensRights11/01/15 03:46 AM
1

Maybe for a normal person? It's already been established that she uses harassment and threats to her advantage. That doesn't suggest she's someone that gets "bummed" by threats.
/r/MensRights11/01/15 02:45 AM
1

They wouldn't have said she could do her talk if the threat was credible. If they believed someone might come to the school to kill people they'd tell her she should cancel the event or at least be clear that yes they think the threat is real so their asses are covered.
/r/MensRights11/01/15 02:39 AM
1

Yeah that's actually what it means when the FBI investigates a threat and says you can do your talk.
/r/MensRights10/01/15 08:59 PM
2

The threat is still a crime but that doesn't mean Anita was ever in any danger.
/r/MensRights10/01/15 08:34 PM
3

The con artistry is that she lied. She presented herself as an expert on video games and she's not, she doesn't even like them. She isn't coming at this in an objective way either as if she wants to learn more about video games because she has her biases and preconceived notions of why they are bad. With regards to the FBI, Anita is still alive isn't she? She's never been assaulted in any way. The threats in the past were bogus.
/r/MensRights10/01/15 07:37 PM
2

Sure. Ok first of all let's just take what Anita says as the truth. What she says about video games is 100% right. I'm not going to argue her points (even though I could, but that is an entirely different discussion). What I am going to try to explain is why we don't like her and why you shouldn't either. It boils down to the fact that she is a liar and a con artist. Anita's Masters thesis is full of contradictions and odd beliefs. For example in one diagram she lists that television includes no…
/r/MensRights10/01/15 06:50 PM
1

That's a good point. I didn't think of that.
/r/MensRights10/01/15 05:43 PM
0

Even so, the single question on it's own was not deserving of the downvotes imho. People could have just replied. Even lazy answers like "she's a con artist" with no context would have been acceptable because that gives onlookers something to go on.
/r/MensRights10/01/15 03:56 AM
3

I checked your history and technically you asked why we hate her not who she is. Although it's still fucked up you got downvoted so heavily either way since both questions are relatively innocent. Some MRA's are very hostile and angry and don't want to explain their views. I don't really blame a lot of them considering what most have gone through but it's still not right to just downvote a simple question like that. That's not how reddit is supposed to work. If you want I can explain why we don'…
/r/MensRights10/01/15 03:55 AM
10

In both these patterns, there is something to be gained for the MRM. We get to practice polite and reasoned responses to criticism and critical inquiry - and we also demonstrate the reasonableness of our position to casual readers. Well said. This is why I don't mind taking the bait. There is always the chance the person is sincere and just created a throwaway...but even if that's not the case at least any lurkers can see what a good response looks like.
/r/MensRights09/01/15 08:54 PM
3

This is a sick case.
/r/MensRights09/01/15 08:52 PM
2

Women are largely selfish and narcissistic in today's society. Men focusing on things like guns, cars, video games, sports, etc bothers women. They want male attention. They crave it like a drug. And then when they come off their high or they OD they despise it and call men immature and creeps.
/r/MensRights28/12/14 05:59 AM
1

I don't know of a support group but I am intimately aware of these types of situations as a friend of mine went through it, we live in SoCal. I went on the stand as a witness during his restraining order hearing and have been involved from the start to now (it's an ongoing issue). If you want to talk feel free to shoot me a PM.
/r/MensRights20/12/14 07:31 AM
2

What the hell is happening and why is EVERYONE starting to get on board with this preposterous case of political correctness. You really want to know? It's called Cultural Marxism. Here's a starter for you if you don't know about it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4fo5jLdJlgI
/r/MensRights30/11/14 02:25 AM
1

These issues are frequently brought up within the MRM.
/r/MensRights29/11/14 08:52 AM
3

Both MRA's and Feminists are involved on both sides. I don't think this sub has an official stance but I'm sure it's more friendly to the Pro GamerGate side than /r/Feminism would be.
/r/MensRights19/11/14 09:37 PM
6

It's good to see that you care about men and an /r/menssupport is probably a good idea for a subreddit that someone should make at some point. That said, /r/mensrights is a mishmash of everything good and bad about the MRM. It's telling the worst stories of boys being raped, men being abused by wives and ending up arrested for going to the police, etc. It's ranting and circle jerking over the stupid things feminists say. It's reporting news relevant to the MRM such as the status of VAWA or male …
/r/MensRights05/11/14 06:48 PM
1

Because that would be politically incorrect and inconsiderate of women.
/r/MensRights04/11/14 02:06 PM
3

I don't think there will be many social changes that are immediately noticeable. Men and women having no strings sex is already pretty common even with the risk of pregnancy and STD's so I don't see that increasing much. I don't think it will help as much as some people are hoping with regards to paternity disputes because a lot of places and courts already single out men as fathers that need to pay child support even in cases where it's known he is not the father and never intended to be or wan…
/r/MensRights04/11/14 05:14 AM
1

It was born as a satirical joke but was soon overtaken by people who are 100% serious about it. There might be a few people left who secretly treat it as a joke but the vast majority are just people who were attracted to the extreme tone that was presented.
/r/MensRights04/11/14 04:01 AM
1

I don't think so.
/r/MensRights02/11/14 10:23 AM
1

I'm just for the fact that humor about sex shouldn't be in the workplace. Why even make a joke like that at work? Because people are human and not robots. I mean yeah we could all go about and not engage in humor or banter or talk about personal lives and just work like drones but that is extremely draining. As for the rest of your post, here's some tips. If you're offended by something there's a very good chance it wasn't sexual harassment. If you're more worried about being seen as lame than w…
/r/MensRights31/10/14 09:28 PM
1

What I mean that is that it's often subjective and based more on feelings than real ill intent. For example someone at work makes a sexually suggestive joke. To 9/10 people it was just a joke, including the person that told the joke. To that 10th person it was offensive and "sexual harassment" even though the joke teller meant nothing by it other than to illicit a laugh. Sexual harassment is a real issue but much like other issues it has been devalued by misuse of the term by ideological zealots…
/r/MensRights31/10/14 01:47 AM
6

It's about what you'd expect. I thought a couple of Colbert's jokes were alright, I chuckled. Then Anita came on. I just find it disturbing that someone so obviously fake and full of shit can get so much mainstream attention. Other than that the interview was not notable, more of the same crap she's been shoveling in her tropes series. I did find it upsetting that Colbert framed Gamergate as a purely male movement though. I know it's not actual news but it's just needlessly disingenuous. You can…
/r/MensRights30/10/14 11:42 AM
1

Sounds like it might be by Erik Kain from Forbes. He's taking a more moderate tone with the whole thing.
/r/MensRights20/10/14 08:56 AM
3

You can also leave a message here: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1Pw9qtOVb5FP_Kr0DlNKGPtFXkBV1VJhfs8iNTc0Q3Zs/viewform
/r/MensRights07/10/14 07:01 AM
1

I didn't mean you I meant in general.
/r/MensRights06/10/14 03:30 PM
6

When he's right he's right and when he's wrong he's wrong. I don't see any use bashing him over things unrelated to the MRM.
/r/MensRights06/10/14 11:30 AM
2

This is not something we can know. You can just as easily ask how many people get away with murder. The only solid numbers you can get are cases where the accuser admitted to lying or was proven false in court. The number of accusations that are made and stick are impossible to know.
/r/MensRights06/10/14 09:00 AM
1

Just a note on the offchance it's unclear, I am not the maker of this video. I just thought it was of interest to many in the MRM and worth watching.
/r/MensRights28/09/14 02:16 PM
1

Ohhhh I remember that. That was quite a long time ago. I wonder why OP is bringing it up now months later.
/r/MensRights28/09/14 09:12 AM
3

No I'm not. I'm not going to try to force anyone into activism. If he wants to be involved he will be.
/r/MensRights28/09/14 07:12 AM
3

No I didn't. I thought I made that clear sorry. I don't know who Brian is and I didn't see his post. Maybe he didn't make it stand out very well. For example a post titled "Hey I'm a Youtuber with 2M+ subs & I want to spread Men's Rights" is going to get more attention than a post titled "Hey". I don't know the situation exactly, obviously, but I think the reason he didn't get attention comes down to however he presented himself.
/r/MensRights28/09/14 06:26 AM
3

On April 7, 2014, Brian used his account to make a post in this sub about spreading the message of men's rights. You don't spread a message to people who already know the message. If he made a video about MRA stuff and spread it to his subscribers that's great. Trying to tell MRA's feminism is bad and men get shafted is pretty pointless. We already know.
/r/MensRights28/09/14 06:18 AM
2

Don't know who you're talking about but it's probably a case of preaching to the choir. Messages we all generally agree with often go by with few comments because there isn't much to say except to circlejerk and all agree with each other. Spreading Men's Rights isn't about talking to other MRA's it's mostly about talking to people who don't know anything about gender politics at all and educating them about it.
/r/MensRights28/09/14 06:00 AM
3

Wow, I really wasn't expecting such a comprehensive list. I've seen a vast many of these articles, statistics, and quotes before but this is really a well compiled and argued piece. Bravo to the author.
/r/MensRights27/09/14 02:01 AM
1

Scorched earth tactic. Fair but it's not my chosen tactic.
/r/MensRights18/09/14 07:53 PM
1

Not everyone uses adblock and adblock doesn't stop page hits. Don't even give them the traffic.
/r/MensRights18/09/14 05:16 PM
1

I don't even know where to start. Cracked is anti MRM for one.
/r/MensRights18/09/14 05:13 PM
6

Don't give Cracked money from your views. Here are the same articles copied so Cracked doesn't profit from this clickbait nonsense. https://archive.today/QEnxW https://archive.today/Ao0eP
/r/MensRights18/09/14 06:07 AM
3

Next time try /r/mensrants
/r/MensRights17/09/14 07:02 PM
2

Not a problem, I appreciate bluntness. If anyone thinks it's a bad idea I want to hear that. Thanks for the support.
/r/MensRights14/09/14 11:16 PM
2

Well fair enough. I think it could be useful but maybe not. I don't think it's going to infringe on the main subreddit here and don't think it will be a problem.
/r/MensRights14/09/14 11:04 PM
2

Good question, thank you for asking. They can, obviously, but I'm sure I'm not the only one that sometimes browses /r/mensrights for news and noteworthy discussions and gets distracted by people asking questions that have been answered a thousand times before. That's perfectly fine since new people come and go all the time and many people like myself are always up to debate things that some others consider set in stone but sometimes, such as when there IS an event going on like the recent IMC in…
/r/MensRights14/09/14 10:59 PM
2

I think you forgot your link friend. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=noMMVUfRv5A
/r/MensRights14/09/14 10:34 PM
1

Depends on the person usually. A quick answer though is no, people do not actually like their fetishes. They are more often attracted to and turned on by the taboo nature of the fetish rather than the fetish itself. For all practical purposes this distinction doesn't really matter though.
/r/MensRights13/09/14 03:46 AM
7

Poor kid. You can tell he was incredibly embarrassed by his mother and upset when she got out of the car just to cause more trouble. Also how is this pussy pass denied? Because he (supposedly) cut her off prior to the video or what?
/r/PussyPassDenied13/09/14 03:44 AM
4

Troll or...? http://www.vice.com/vice-profiles/the-women-of-the-mens-rights-movement-751 Edit: OP is correct, see my next comment for proof.
/r/MensRights13/09/14 03:38 AM
1

That's interesting. In contrast my friends (soon to be) ex wife called LAPD with false accusations and they did cuff him but did not arrest him. I've heard that Nevada takes both the man and the woman regardless of who called but that may just be hearsay.
/r/MensRights13/09/14 03:35 AM
1

As far as I know yes. That message was being spammed before and during PAX mostly.
/r/MensRights07/09/14 04:10 PM
2

It was false flag copypasta.
/r/MensRights07/09/14 03:59 PM
2

Again? Because that worked out so well for them last time right? Oh well, not my problem if a bunch of special snowflakes get triggered.
/r/MensRights07/09/14 07:14 AM
3

1) Wanting to treat men and women exactly the same in every type of situation. I for one do not want that. I believe men and women should be treated equally under the law but I do not believe, for example, that women should be playing in the NFL or that men should be allowed to play in women's tennis. I also think sex segregated schools should be more of an option than they are right now. There's a difference between equality under the law and treating men and women as if they are the same thing…
/r/MensRights06/09/14 02:29 PM
2

The onus is on the woman to back up her statement. She needs to prove that you don't need to disprove it.
/r/MensRights05/09/14 07:32 AM
3

I think we already do something like that.
/r/MensRights04/09/14 04:27 AM
-2

Just a note, merely to be an MRA is extreme. I think that is really the importance difference at this time between the MRM and Feminism. And I take the Razorbladekandy approach to extremism myself. That is I'd rather welcome a true and blue actual misogynist and try to turn them into a useful tool for activism than turn them away to placate people who are going to call us a hate movement anyway. All are welcome as long as they don't advocate violence or illegal activity.
/r/MensRights03/09/14 10:43 PM
3

Makes us look bad to some, makes others curious. You really can't deny the results.
/r/MensRights03/09/14 03:33 PM
-9

We don't really need you to defend us, we can stand on our own merits. Besides which the vast majority of people that call us a hate group are gender ideologues. They know exactly what we are and they hate us for it. You aren't going to change their minds.
/r/MensRights03/09/14 03:28 PM
87

Note that this is still just a subreddit on reddit. For as much activism as is promoted here...that is not the subs only purpose. If you want to be an activist go right ahead but yes a lot of people come here just to complain. It would be nice if they separated more onto /r/mensrants but I'm not going to be a dick to someone venting because for some people this is the only place they get a chance to really share what they think and let off some steam.
/r/MensRights03/09/14 11:33 AM
2

They need to be directed to /r/mensrants unless they're especially noteworthy.
/r/MensRights03/09/14 06:58 AM
11

Strawman: the post
/r/MensRights01/09/14 06:04 AM
3

Good point.
/r/MensRights31/08/14 11:52 AM
3

Most likely just a troll.
/r/MensRights31/08/14 10:47 AM
7

I don't think it's clear if this is real or not is it?
/r/MensRights31/08/14 10:46 AM
4

Where have you been? The rage has literally been non stop night and day since this whole thing started. Kotaku, RPS, Polygon, etc are all being brought to task in their comments sections, on twitter, and on various forums.
/r/MensRights30/08/14 09:28 AM
2

Pretty sure there was a study done that concluded that men stare at a women's face first and longer, while women check out women's breasts first.
/r/MensRights29/08/14 09:08 AM
1

Kind of old news but still ridiculous.
/r/MensRights29/08/14 05:57 AM
2

Two separate issues. They just share a common thread of having to do with batshit feminists and gaming.
/r/MensRights29/08/14 02:40 AM
2

Prison. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2449454/More-men-raped-US-women-including-prison-sexual-abuse.html http://abcnews.go.com/WNT/story?id=131113 http://america.aljazeera.com/opinions/2014/4/united-states-prisonrapesexualassaultovercrowdedprisons.html
/r/MensRights27/08/14 10:50 PM
3

Far more rapes are perpetrated by men Far more men are victims of rape. If number of victims means you deserve to control the narrative (I don't believe it does but w/e) then feminists need to step back and let MRA's be the leading voice on rape. sexual harassment is more commonly experienced by women Sexual harassment is nebulous and often a non issue. Yeah a woman doesn't need to put up with her boss hitting on her everyday but on the other hand two guys having a private conversation and makin…
/r/MensRights27/08/14 10:47 PM
0

I don't know him. What are his credentials as an MRA?
/r/MensRights27/08/14 10:35 PM
5

GWW nails it again. You don't have to like them or what they do and we can denounce them all we want. It will not appease those who call us extremists. They will not let up until you stop advocating for the humane treatment of men. Learn to let what people think of you go.
/r/MensRights27/08/14 01:04 AM
19

I like this promoted comments thing.
/r/MensRights25/08/14 09:56 PM
1

Might be better not to say anything then. Don't give her ammo to turn your friend against you.
/r/MensRights25/08/14 04:53 AM
1

This is good advice. Skip the prenup. If she's a major bitch the liklihood of it being thrown out is high anyway and it adds unnecessary stress to the relationship.
/r/MensRights25/08/14 03:49 AM
3

I went through the same thing. Earlier this year friend was marrying an ex he got back together with and I said everything under the sun to convince him not to do it or at least wait. The bottom line is you can't make him do anything and it's highly unlikely you'll be able to convince him either. The chemical cocktail we refer to as love is potent and there isn't much someone on the outside of the relationship can do to effect it. My suggestion to you is think long and hard about what you can sa…
/r/MensRights25/08/14 03:48 AM
6

Have you never bathed with your parents or known someone who has? I remember when I was a very young child I took showers with my mom and dad and used to have baths with my second cousin while his mom would play with us with bath toys. There is nothing "creepy" about it unless your mind is already in the gutter.
/r/MensRights24/08/14 06:47 AM
5

It was important to note what the main discussion has been about (the one everyone is having) and differentiating what he was going to say otherwise it may have been overlooked as redundant. If people saw the video they might assume at first that he's just repeating MundaneMatt or InternetAristocrat and decide to not watch the video. Skip to about 1:10 and check out what he has to say.
/r/MensRights24/08/14 02:16 AM
29

The gaming journalism issue is overshadowing something really evil that Zoe did. She didn't just sleep with 5 guys to give her game good press. She attacked the depressed men on Wizardchan and tried to stir up major trouble for them. Let's not forget this fact guys because it relates directly to Men's Rights. Gaming is important to a lot of us...but depression and suicide are larger issues to the MR community. Let's not let this fact be swept aside.
/r/MensRights23/08/14 09:04 PM
7

Re: The Wizardchan "raid". https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9tT_O4pU7aM The gaming journalism issue is overshadowing something really evil that Zoe did. She didn't just sleep with 5 guys to give her game good press. She attacked the depressed men on Wizardchan and tried to stir up major trouble for them. Let's not forget this fact guys because it relates directly to Men's Rights.
/r/MensRights23/08/14 08:34 PM
2

Well played Piggie.
/r/MensRights23/08/14 02:44 AM
7

Wait, you're denying that women are objectified? Yes women are not treated as literal objects by the vast majority of society. I do not pull up a woman, sit down on her, and recline after a hard days work. I do not put a beer in her mouth and pop the cap. Women are not objects and the only ones who perpetuate this myth are competitors in the victim olympics. Now, are there some assholes out there who treat women like shit? Sure. But it's not acceptable by anyone's standards. Women are discarded …
/r/MensRights22/08/14 11:28 PM
9

It has more about telling the truth than bashing anyone. Objectification? Wage gap? Yeah no.
/r/MensRights22/08/14 09:44 PM
6

When are they not? Isn't that like their job or something? Aside from being SJW's and Hashtagtivists I mean. /eyeroll
/r/MensRights22/08/14 08:44 PM
18

Wow I can't believe Khan Academy went from helping kids with math and science to "Feminist Theory". Glad to see Karen and Paul are already in the comments.
/r/MensRights22/08/14 08:34 PM
2

Your account is new but I'm going to presume you've been on the scene longer than 3 days. You're right it's not really about doxxing but it's not about witch hunts either. The reality is that the reddit admin team has a strong bias against us and will use any excuse to shut this sub down. If they can do it under the guise of doxxing or witch hunts or whatever they will. Which is why our mods are extra careful.
/r/MensRights20/08/14 06:21 AM
3

Thanks for looking out for the subreddit sillymod and nicemod. I know a lot of us aren't happy with reddit's policies regarding "doxing" but I'm sure we'd be even more upset if the MR subreddit was shut down.
/r/MensRights20/08/14 02:02 AM
3

Just FYI for the future friend, when you say "I wont mention this thing that I could mention because I think it's true but there is really no need to mention it" in the eyes of basically everyone who reads your comment...you just mentioned it. So next time either leave it out or just say what you gotta say. Nice post by the way.
/r/MensRights15/08/14 01:05 PM
5

From a US POV here is my criteria: Fuck'em both. Democrats are the party of marxists and social justice warriors. They are openly contemptuous of men and our so called "privilege". You wont find an ally there if your goal is to solve male issues. Republicans are the party of traditionalists. They'll smile at you while they wrap you in chains of responsibility to women, to children you may not have even wanted, to a way of life that's just as restrictive as being "in the kitchen". You wont find a…
/r/MensRights11/08/14 10:43 AM
9

Note that not all of these are technically or 100% MR. 6oodfella Typhonblue Barbarossa Bernard Chapin Billy Clement Doomrulz FeminismLOL Honey Badger Radio Girlwriteswhat ManWomanMyth JohnTheOther Paul Elam RazorBladeKandy VictorZen Chazwold Almighty Aaron Clarey InternetAristocrat Thunderf00t Ravishing Rick Rude Ramzpaul SargonofAkkad MayorofMGTOWN Sandman Spetsnaz StudioBrule Stefan Molyneux SparkyFister ThatGuyT Mythoffeminism TheMaleViewTV ThinkingApeTV AKA Stardusk My personal favorite is R…
/r/MensRights10/08/14 03:44 AM
3

8 officers sounds about right. Similar thing happened to my friend sans any violence and they still cuffed him on her word alone. He was actually happy they showed up at first because she was just off the rails and had ran into a neighbors house with their daughter. He was just standing outside the house chatting with the husband/owner when the cops showed up. It's a very screwed up world we live in.
/r/MensRights08/08/14 02:47 PM
2

Happens to a lot of people, sorry to hear that. A friend of mine is going through a divorce and custody battle for his daughter right now. It's amazing what police and courts will overlook because it's a woman.
/r/MensRights08/08/14 02:30 PM
8

Yes pretty much. Court, especially family court, tends to have an anti male bias. If you want to know more the documentary Divorce Corp is a good place to start.
/r/MensRights08/08/14 02:12 PM
3

To a certain degree yes.
/r/MensRights07/08/14 07:12 AM
5

HAHAHA ...wait this was serious?
/r/MensRights05/08/14 02:16 AM
1

You're now arguing about his tight to be concerned as a father for some reason. Because that's all there ever was really. The OP of that post was looking at it from the wrong angle. This has nothing to do with manipulating the courts bias against men, it's about the concerns of a father about the welfare of his son.
/r/MensRights30/07/14 06:28 AM
1

Wow so this would have no emotional toll? Why would it? It really has nothing to do with him. Living with a mistake from his past being used against him once again Let's be real, neither of us know anything about this guy. He could be a hardened and unrepentant criminal or he could be a nice guy who made a mistake when he was younger. We just don't know but the facts of the mater are the facts. He is a convicted felon, the mother is a former meth head, the father was already awarded custody. If …
/r/MensRights30/07/14 04:51 AM
1

Yeah I'm sure this guy will be completely unaffected by the court using his past to prevent his gf/wife from having custody Ummm...yes pretty much. What do you think is going to happen? They'll throw him in jail? Put him on probation (if he isn't on it already)? especially by manipulating a system with libel. Libel? Facts are facts. Step parents are more likely to molest children. The step father is a felon and the mother is a former meth head which is probably the main reason the court gave the…
/r/MensRights30/07/14 03:44 AM
-1

I don't think that's as bad as you think it is. Most molestation occurs from step parents and if the guy is already a felon the risk is probably increased. This is a legitimate concern and the father could hammer this home in court. It doesn't effect the man the mother married, it would just prevent her from getting custody.
/r/MensRights30/07/14 01:33 AM
1

You have two options imo. Talk to your son about why he wants to live with his mother. Try to explain why it isn't a good idea. Alternatively talk to the mother and try to arrange for more visits but not custody, she might go for that if her intent is just to see her son more. FIND THE MONEY. I don't think it can be overstated how useful a lawyer can be in custody disputes. Maybe you need to shop around and find a lawyer more in your price range, a friend of mine got a lawyer on retainer for $50…
/r/MensRights30/07/14 01:28 AM
4

By telling the truth.
/r/MensRights30/07/14 01:20 AM
2

It might be in bookstores but you'd have an easier time finding it online. I think he just released a new ebook edition. I don't know much about emma goldmen or ayn rand beyond just their names sorry. IIRC ayn rands most popular book is atlas shrugged though if that helps, haven't read it myself.
/r/MensRights29/07/14 10:31 AM
4

Sommers is what many call an "equity" feminist. Which basically means she is one of the few people who wear the feminist label and live up to the dictionary definition of wanting "equality" between the sexes. It is not at all weird that you agree with both as many feminists consider Sommers some kind of a traitor.
/r/MensRights29/07/14 06:00 AM
6

Read myth of male power by Warren Farrell. He could be called a (former) feminist and was head of the New York chapter of the National Organization for Women. If there was ever an unbiased middle of the road view of how men and women should relate to each other this is it.
/r/MensRights29/07/14 05:56 AM
1

I'm not opposed to direct action but in all honesty I think it might be a better idea to wait a couple years and see if we can get a president who is slightly more friendly to the idea. At most we'd probably grab this administrations attention in a negative way.
/r/MensRights28/07/14 04:07 AM
1

A friend of mine is going through the same shit right now.
/r/MensRights27/07/14 12:08 AM
6

I don't think there's much more he can do. If the court ordered him custody then maybe he can go to the police and report it as kidnap? Other than that I think he'll just have to wait it out. Maybe she'll reveal herself and ask for child support or something.
/r/MensRights26/07/14 05:06 AM
4

Well I don't work in the games industry but as someone who plays games I've gotten plenty of "rape" and "death" threats over the years. Know what I did about it? Laugh and continue playing the game because I like to play games. I like how her evidence for the reality is just anecdotal. I was kind of expecting some made up statistic but this is even more sad.
/r/MensRights25/07/14 08:44 PM
2

They're both anti male but the Democratic party far more so. Don't think the Republicans are our friends...but they aren't nearly as bad as Democrats. There is a political lean to the MRM, at least in the US, even though some may wish otherwise.
/r/MensRights24/07/14 06:07 AM
2

Pretty much.
/r/MensRights21/07/14 09:38 AM
6

Skimmed the quotes, I'm familiar with most of them. I can assure you neither Paul Elam or Warren Farrell are supporters of pedophilia (or incest for that matter). The quotes come from various sources but for Farrell, he did a study on incest years ago (that he never published iirc) and had an interview about the study in which he talks about his findings and what certain family members said about it. So while he is saying that a sexual encounter between a father and daughter is "one of the few p…
/r/MensRights18/07/14 05:15 PM
2

/r/pussypass is a good resource for cases (mainly criminal) where women get lighter sentences simply because they are women. Not sure if that's exactly what you're looking for.
/r/MensRights16/07/14 07:58 PM
1

Well I guess we'll have to disagree on that. If you haven't already I suggest watching Razorbladekandy's video on misogyny in the movement. Kind of a different topic but it does cover some basic facts such as the general public hating us and why we really shouldn't care all that much.
/r/MensRights07/07/14 08:35 PM
1

The movement is growing like a wildfire at the moment. I think we're doing fine being perceived as angry misogynists led by king kitten killer himself.
/r/MensRights07/07/14 08:10 PM
2

Paul Elam just told me to go fuck myself So? He does that to a lot of people. Can he be trusted? Yes. Unless you can provide a credible reason not to. http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Paul_Elam Rational Wiki is like FreeThoughtBlogs and other such organizations. Meaning it is anything but rational. Not a credible source of info sorry. I'll never call myself an MRA as long as this guy remains prominent. I'm sure we'll dearly miss your support. Surely we can find a better leader than a belligerent too…
/r/MensRights07/07/14 11:38 AM
11

Isn't that what this subreddit doesn't like about feminists? No. Maybe you should read up and find out instead of just making assumptions.
/r/MensRights06/07/14 08:24 PM
24

What happened to the money that was raised though?
/r/MensRights06/07/14 08:22 PM
5

Good work.
/r/MensRights04/07/14 06:10 AM
7

GMP throws the MRM a bone once in awhile but it's generally as anti male as Jezebel.
/r/MensRights21/06/14 12:10 AM
2

I think I understand what you're trying to say but I don't think you worded it very well. Pretending for a second that 99% of government funding for DV shelters goes to the benefit of only women it is technically true that a change to 80% women/20% men would be to the "detriment" of women but that's just because women have so many privileges. The closer to 50/50 things get the more it "hurts" women but that's what equality will be in many cases.
/r/MensRights21/06/14 12:07 AM
4

When and where can I watch this?
/r/MensRights20/06/14 03:47 AM
1

Pretty sure that is not their intentions.
/r/MensRights19/06/14 09:10 PM
3

National Coalition For Men maybe? I think they have chapters in different cities. http://ncfm.org/
/r/MensRights16/06/14 08:21 PM
3

More appropriate for /r/MensRants
/r/MensRights10/06/14 03:05 PM
4

"Teach men not to rape," - Hateful slur. "Women begging to be raped," - Oh, that's just evocative language. Did you even read the whole article? That's so offensive toward men. Like a woman needs to screen the men she parties with beforehand to know they aren't potential rapists. Putting words in my mouth. You go to a party where you don't know anyone you don't know who's nice, who's an asshole, who will take you home or take care of you if you drink too much, etc. If you don't know anyone at a …
/r/MensRights09/06/14 12:10 PM
2

I can be against this article and still sympathize with men's struggles. The article you take objection to isn't saying anything any MRA wouldn't say. That it's not "victim blaming" to say women need to take responsibility for their own safety and that there are actions which will increase or lower risk. That is all the article is saying. It's saying it in a way which pisses people off, particularly feminists, so they god damn pay attention to it. It's also bait for quote miners so that when it'…
/r/MensRights09/06/14 12:01 PM
13

Do you know what FTSU is? I mean what it really is? It's not violence, it's winning the ideological battle. Showing the world feminism for what it truly is. Remember that guy that stood passively at UofT while some fembot screamed at him that he was scum? He fucked her shit up. As for the specific quote that's got your panties in a bunch, you're misreading it. It's evocative language and that's what Paul Elam has always been good at but it's not exactly a new or harmful idea in the MRM. He is sa…
/r/MensRights08/06/14 04:44 PM
15

File a police report. If your situation is real you have my support and sympathy but I can't take this picture and your word at face value.
/r/MensRights08/06/14 12:09 PM
2

Stefan Molyneux is not someone I would recommend going into with eyes closed and open arms. He's very charismatic and holds some wild beliefs and if you're not careful you may get wrapped up in something you never expected or wanted to be a part of. That said, as the video outlines, it's fine to be a passive listener of his show or to even engage on his forums if you're so inclined. He says a lot of interesting stuff, especially about feminism, and nothing he says or does is illegal. There may c…
/r/MensRights08/06/14 10:52 AM
0

4chan
/r/MensRights08/06/14 10:32 AM
3

False choice. I'd rather masculinity wasn't demonized in the first place.
/r/MensRights07/06/14 12:24 PM
2

The answer to our problems is not to feminize men.
/r/MensRights07/06/14 12:10 PM
9

Not to mention his manifesto doesn't even mention men's rights once. What a true blue MRA he was.
/r/MensRights07/06/14 11:55 AM
1

So if men are considered the devil, how are they going to get more rights? I didn't say that. I said in order for the illusion of oppressed minorities to work the mainstream needs a devil. That isn't to say all people consider men "devils" it's to say those sick people who work under the oppressed/oppressor dynamics will demonize men to serve their interests. If something is true, it needs to be known to be true. What I am trying to say is you're giving me the impression you want some kind of sp…
/r/MensRights07/06/14 11:53 AM
1

This is just my own opinion but I think most MRA's are either in their 40's-50's or their early 20's. I think this is a combination of men who have been burned and young men who have had their eyes opened.
/r/MensRights07/06/14 11:47 AM
4

Correspondingly, men have to get in touch with their femininity. They need to learn how to be vulnerable. They need to learn how to say "We need help". No. I'm not playing the victim olympics. Acting like a victimized class, even in cases where it may be true, will get men nowhere. In order for the illusion of oppressed minorities to work the mainstream needs a devil. Men, white men in particular, are that devil. No amount of feminizing men will change that and in fact is probably harmful consid…
/r/MensRights07/06/14 11:34 AM
0

Just a note: this is why we're sometimes seen as a "brigading" subreddit even from neutral parties. I know it's born of good intentions but when it's a subreddit that's not big like Askreddit it's easy to see why some people can be offput by all the MRA's that flood the place that don't normally post there. I know it's tempting to rush in when a topic related to mens rights gets popular so we can inform the uninformed but I sometimes think it might be better to show a bit of restraint once in aw…
/r/MensRights06/06/14 11:09 PM
2

She's /u/girlwriteswhat. Dunno about Paul or Dean.
/r/MensRights06/06/14 07:47 PM
3

Joe is alright. He seems to be kind of inbetween worlds, a purple pill-er. He takes a man friendly position most of the time but I've seen him pull out some gynocentric bullshit too. You could pick worse people to listen to I guess.
/r/MensRights06/06/14 07:44 PM
3

http://j4mb.wordpress.com/
/r/MensRights06/06/14 05:20 PM
1

Looks like it was a troll.
/r/MensRights05/06/14 09:13 PM
4

New account? Could be a throwaway or could be a troll. OP can you point out who you are in the video and/or confirm your identity?
/r/MensRights05/06/14 08:30 PM
1

Since when do you get sex for being a male feminist?
/r/MensRights05/06/14 06:12 PM
2

I thought it was weird that Anita Sarkeesian was apparently a backer of the game.
/r/MensRights05/06/14 04:58 PM
2

It's pretty clear OP isn't interested in learning anything. They're just challenging our position. Do you see them asking any followup questions or even thanking people for answers? Nope. This was a drive by. Which is fine. I don't mind answering drive by's. We see them a lot in /r/askaconservative. But I don't begrudge Sasha's stance to tell them to fuck off and read a book.
/r/MensRights05/06/14 01:21 PM
1

Yeah I'm not really seeing the connection on this one at all. OP can you at least provide some commentary so we can see where you're coming from? I don't want to just dismiss you out of hand but I'm having a hard time seeing the justification for posting this here.
/r/MensRights03/06/14 06:51 PM
15

I prefer the musical version. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=avu5NT1ZYT8
/r/MensRights01/06/14 03:27 PM
7

Well. That pretty much says it all doesn't it?
/r/MensRights01/06/14 03:26 PM
2

Well at least someone here isn't uptight tonight.
/r/MensRights01/06/14 09:38 AM
0

If you can actually make this a discussion about gender inequity then I all for it. Pointing out the ridiculousness of feminism, especially in a funny and accessible way, is exactly that. Just because they wont like it doesn't mean it's trolling.
/r/MensRights01/06/14 08:07 AM
1

A lot and a little.
/r/MensRights31/05/14 12:04 PM
2

Oh ok. I thought it might have been one of her talks but the dates didn't seem right.
/r/MensRights30/05/14 12:52 PM
6

What happened between April 15th and 22nd to cause so many subscriptions? Edit: btw is there going to be some sort of commemoration or something when the sub hits 100k subscribers? Looks like it will be happening soon.
/r/MensRights30/05/14 12:29 PM
3

Wow that was a very fair piece for HuffPo. Credit where it's due. I mean she did try to drag the MRM and AVFM through the mud...but she allowed some response to the criticism unlike most outlets who just call us a hate movement and move on.
/r/MensRights30/05/14 01:08 AM
1

Not sure what you're suggesting that isn't already being done. We call out all lies as they come.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 08:13 AM
1

I don't know all the ins and outs but IIRC the gist of it is that school funding cannot discriminate by sex. The big argument this tends to cause is with sports. A lot of schools don't want to invest as much money in women's sports as mens but it also effects other things.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 08:03 AM
3

It's not. Feminism is clearly anti male as are the vast majority of feminists. At it's core this movement is about fighting misandry and those who practice it. Not all people believe the same things. If we did we'd have world peace right? Some people contend that privilege doesn't exist. Others admit it exists but argue it's unquantifiable and irrelevant to any discussion because it's primarily used as a silencing tactic ("check your privilege"). Not all MRA's agree on the same things.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 03:56 AM
2

Sounds like bullshit to me.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 11:30 AM
1

Not really. I mean I suppose it's possible to have sexist music but I think anyone pointing out anything remotely mainstream as sexist is just plain wrong most times. Furthermore even assuming they're right I have never seen any evidence that media (books, TV, music, movies, video games, etc) has a negative impact on sane adults. It can have an effect on the mentally impaired or children which is why most media is labeled so any proper parent or caretaker can know what is and isn't appropriate. …
/r/MensRights27/05/14 08:55 AM
6

Well you didn't really answer my question about what exactly you'd like to know more about but I can answer this. why individuals feel a need to make a separate movement rather than work on an existing movement for equality from the inside in order to eradicate its flaws. The short answer is we were told to GTFO so we left. The longer answer is that we tried for a very long time and we now realize it's not necessary. Many older people in the MRM are former feminists, two prominent examples being…
/r/MensRights27/05/14 04:14 AM
1

I tried to skim through it but your post is pretty wordy and tl;dr. Can you sum up what exactly you'd like to know more about? All I got out of your OP was that you're a feminist that wants to know more about the MRM.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 03:46 AM
1

You realize I'm not the guy that called you a retard right?
/r/PussyPass26/05/14 01:01 AM
2

Low quality troll. Work on your technique and try again later.
/r/MensRights25/05/14 12:29 PM
2

Cool story. But if you agree then why are you here complaining about the subreddit?
/r/PussyPass25/05/14 10:24 AM
2

The word 'retard' was originally used to bully those with special needs. The word retard/retarded had a clinical meaning in the past actually. It was used to describe a certain type of person. Bullies can and will say anything and everything to hurt their target, that doesn't mean a word has to be off limits and new, less harmful terms must be invented. It's the way something is said, the intent, not the word that is harmful. If someone has ill intent that will never go away. And for the life of…
/r/PussyPass25/05/14 10:23 AM
2

They aren't "special needs" they're retarded. Stop sugar coating the problems these people have. It's like saying the dead are life challenged or some such. It's asinine.
/r/PussyPass25/05/14 09:44 AM
3

Men and women both are equally responsible for the pussy pass. Doesn't mean that shit is ok.
/r/PussyPass25/05/14 09:43 AM
6

Feels like more of an /r/mensrants post tbh. But yeah pretty funny.
/r/MensRights16/05/14 08:09 AM
1

Came here to say this. Spetsnaz is the perfect place to start on the subject. He puts things very well.
/r/MensRights13/05/14 04:53 AM
8

We're not feminists.
/r/MensRights13/05/14 04:51 AM
34

Well, to play devils advocate, they could be testing you for sexism. Edit: Can you tell us what company this is?
/r/MensRights12/05/14 07:43 AM
-4

I guess I can see your point but it still seems like more of an LGBT issue to me. Gay men have their masculinity doubted...because they are gay. There is some small overlap though so I'll concede the point.
/r/MensRights11/05/14 08:05 AM
-4

Since you asked, I think this is too pro LGBT. What's the story here as it relates to MR exactly? It's a success story? What did he do that other male athletes before him didn't? This just seems like the stereotypical pat on the back we often see women do. First woman to do X, first woman to receive Y. I think being the first PERSON to achieve something is momentous, after that you're just splitting people into different camps for pity points.
/r/MensRights11/05/14 07:35 AM
0

I don't think they need to be banned. Just downvote and/or point them to /r/mensrants.
/r/MensRights10/05/14 11:17 PM
3

You have to remember that MRA's of the past were mostly polite and watched their tone. They tried to work with feminists and the system at large. The MRM of today is different and I think we can expect to see a different outcome eventually.
/r/MensRights10/05/14 10:58 PM
1

Legal Paternal Surrender, also known as paper abortion.
/r/MensRights06/05/14 06:01 PM
3

Pretty sure most here take a "pro choice" stance. I am pro life. I don't think the issue has much to do with MR aside from it's relation to LPS though.
/r/MensRights05/05/14 06:58 PM
1

Thanks for the heads up nicemod. After my other account, /u/IAMULTRAHARDCORE , was shadowbanned I cut back on a lot of the behavior that probably caused it but it's good to know I should be extra careful right now.
/r/MensRights05/05/14 12:02 AM
1

You don't come into a group and tell them they need to change. That's what feminists do. This is just concern/tone trolling.
/r/MensRights04/05/14 12:46 PM
2

OP have you ever even posted in this subreddit before? I admit I only briefly scanned your history and didn't see any posts or comments that linked back to MR or even any political subreddits. Why do you think it's ok to come tell nearly 90,000 people what to do when you seemingly have nothing to do with us? Kindly go fuck yourself and take your concern trolling attitude with you.
/r/MensRights03/05/14 02:03 PM
4

This seem like the most appropriate use to me. Fling the hypocrisy at them.
/r/MensRights01/05/14 12:42 PM
2

If you're worried about it being seen as weird or creepy don't be. That kind of thing usually doesn't happen until you're an adult. You're still at an age where society views you as a child and not as a potential child molester. If you want to make some extra cash baby sitting then go for it.
/r/MensRights27/04/14 08:47 AM
2

This isn't the victim olympics. Men and women both have problems unique to their sex. Whether one has it "worse" or not is irrelevant.
/r/MensRights27/04/14 08:44 AM
12

I don't think you're authorized to make this statement. Please sign and date here, here, here, and we'll need your initials right there. Thanks.
/r/MensRights27/04/14 02:33 AM
6

I'll just leave this here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F3wStCw7ThE
/r/MensRights25/04/14 11:41 AM
1

As long as the original poster is notified what is going on and it actually links back to the original article it seems like a good idea to me. Question though, could this be abused somehow by people linking to sites that might get the subreddit in trouble? I'm thinking of doxxing mainly. Since apparently we can't even link twitter or twitter screenshots anymore without blacking out profile info I'm not sure what's safe and what isn't.
/r/MensRights24/04/14 10:41 AM
1

Where did you get that number from?
/r/MensRights22/04/14 04:48 AM
14

There are three answers which are all correct to a degree. First and foremost it's just not politically correct to be even remotely associated with the MRM. You're basically the KKK of today's world. You hate women, you're a failure at life, you eat kittens, etc. So even most non feminists don't see is in a good light. Second and probably more importantly is that MRA's tend to have a bad habit of flooding subreddits they don't tend to frequent because someone mentioned that a relevant topic was …
/r/MensRights21/04/14 09:25 AM
4

That's too bad. It was nice having their plain hatred and bigotry on display. Guess they finally wised up.
/r/MensRights21/04/14 03:53 AM
0

I wouldn't worry about this too much. Maybe watch for new categories being added if you're worried about them lying.
/r/MensRights19/04/14 09:58 AM
-1

Not specifically related to men's right so I downvoted but I agree with your sentiments OP.
/r/MensRights19/04/14 09:47 AM
3

Sorry to hear this. I've always enjoyed Pierce's insight. I do want to make a comment that I think a lot of people haven't considered or said yet. Being even remotely involved with the MRM is tough. You hear a lot of horror stories, face a lot of ridicule, and even have to live down threats to family and livelihood. But even beyond that there is an expectation from the larger community to live up to. So many people are saying Pierce can't quit because we need him...but maybe that's part of the r…
/r/MensRights19/04/14 08:24 AM
2

It's interesting that you say Feminism wasn't born in the Soviet Union when it's really just "Marxism in panties" as GWW puts it. The actual movement may have started in the US but the idea of an oppressor class and the oppressed is far older and comes from a place outside the US. Anyways I'm sorry if you and others feel attacked. It wasn't my intention to start a left/right flame war. I was just trying to get it across to OP that he isn't going to be cast out of the MRM for holding less than eg…
/r/MensRights18/04/14 03:36 AM
-5

I guess so. I don't mean to get partisan here but we have left wing MRA's and I'm sure some of which vote Democrat despite their obviously anti male stance. I see these people more as conflicted MRA's who are shooting themselves in the foot rather than as "enemies". If they want to call themselves MRA's that's fine by me. They just aren't very good ones. Likewise someone who holds a non egalitarian stance, whatever it may be, isn't a very good MRA.
/r/MensRights18/04/14 02:54 AM
7

Good point. Some things that are submitted do seem to be posted with the intention that the readers get angry but I think tagging such things as "outrage porn" is the wrong way to single them out.
/r/MensRights16/04/14 12:54 AM
0

As a conservative without any conservative friends to speak of I share your desire to get to know some like minded people. However this isn't a social network (or dating service?). Your post is polite but offtopic. Not going to downvote you but maybe next time just try r4r if you're looking for gay MRA friends or even the meta subreddit if you strongly believe a gay MRA subreddit should exist. Thanks.
/r/MensRights11/04/14 08:17 PM
5

Well that is definitely my opinion and fair enough. Thanks for taking the time to participate in the discussion here and clarify at the least.
/r/MensRights09/04/14 08:58 PM
3

I really don't see how this can be a rule without being completely arbitrary. What happens when someone links to an article about George Zimmerman in /r/news or to make this relevant to this subreddit what if someone links to an A Voice For Men article where the authors names are published? Is that crossing a line? If the only line is the intent of the poster how can you judge that except arbitrarily? Some people make it obvious but some people don't and then you get innocent people caught in th…
/r/MensRights09/04/14 08:53 PM
0

Bad meme. Still perpetuates the idea that there is a gap due to discrimination.
/r/MensRights09/04/14 06:48 PM
12

That doesn't make any sense at all. There are news twitters. There are verified celebrity twitters. There are political twitters. I believe this subreddit even has an official twitter. I could understand if people were linking random twitters and saying "hey look this random feminist said this bad thing, attack her!" but has that even been happening? And even if it was could we not just ban the people who were doing that? How can we not be allowed to link to the White House's twitter for example…
/r/MensRights09/04/14 06:44 PM
76

Misandry doesn't real?
/r/MensRights09/04/14 06:38 PM
16

And we're tired of your shit too OP. No, not you specifically obviously. But any and all who try to tone police this subreddit. I don't give two shits what /r/feminism and any of it's derivatives thinks of what we say here or how we say it. Yeah a lot of the people here are angry. Yeah they're going to be sarcastic. And yeah they're not going to stop criticizing feminism or societies impression of pure and holy women that can do no wrong. Being angry about this shit is natural and it is healthy …
/r/MensRights08/04/14 03:58 AM
20

Given that you said your thing is pranks I would suggest setting something up with a gender swap. Something that the audience might find funny if it's done to a man but switch the man for a woman and suddenly it's not funny anymore. Those who are there just for humor will probably still roll with the initial joke and anyone who stops laughing will hopefully be asking themselves why it was funny at first but not after the switch.
/r/MensRights07/04/14 04:26 AM
3

A lot of what MR is concerned with right now is simply getting the message out that men and boys need help to everyone. Feminists number in the millions and have state and private support with billions of dollar floating around for various initiatives. I would be surprised to learn that there are even one million self described MRA's all over the world. Despite that there are some initiatives and campaigns to right wrongs, especially in the area of Father's Rights. If you want to know more about…
/r/MensRights07/04/14 04:22 AM
1

I don't oppose abortion because I think it will secure rights for men. I also don't think opposing abortion is an evil thing. It is not immoral to oppose something that is immoral in the first place, which is what abortion is. To be clear I have no desire to push the abortion topic from the perspective of men's rights I was just replying to OP and his desire to bribe women for rights. I realize there are many in this movement who are pro choice and that is ok with me because we aren't here to fi…
/r/MensRights06/04/14 06:10 PM
4

No one gives a shit what you are. You can be a one eyed one horned flying purple people eater (pls don't eat me) for all anyone here cares. Just support the rights of men and boys and you're in.
/r/MensRights06/04/14 12:00 PM
3

I'm someone who believes abortion is murder so I will never support it under any condition but that is neither here nor there. All three of your points rest on the fact that if we extend women these things surely they will eventually come around and grant us our rights. Right? How could they not. It would be hypocritical. No. The people we are fighting don't give two shits about being hypocritical. They'll admit it and laugh in your face. They will never support men being able to get out from un…
/r/MensRights06/04/14 11:57 AM
3

Sorry but I don't agree. The gist of your argument seems to be if we throw the dog a bone maybe it'll come back our way in the form of rights. That's not how it works. You don't bribe people for rights that should be yours in the first place.
/r/MensRights06/04/14 12:23 AM
2

Nice topic but fuck the SPLC.
/r/MensRights04/04/14 07:04 PM
3

This is fine.
/r/MensRights03/04/14 08:42 AM
3

Does this mean that they become celibate? No. Or is it just a matter of not following the script of getting married and providing for a family? That's the main gist of it. Is cohabitation with a woman allowed? Yes. Essentially it's a "be what you want to be and do what you want to do" philosophy. Don't let society's expectations dictate your life. I'm not MGTOW so I'm sure one will come in and explain it better but if you want to be with a woman it's not like it's forbidden or something. You kno…
/r/MensRights02/04/14 11:48 AM
3

This is a good post but don't link Jezebel. Screenshot or use pastebin or something.
/r/MensRights02/04/14 07:27 AM
1

Of course not. I said I think we should err on the side of more freedom rather than less. Reddit has a built in tool to drown out trolls and float the good stuff to the top. All we need to do is use it.
/r/MensRights31/03/14 05:49 AM
4

No I don't like this suggestion. If they're trolling report the post and move on. If it's factually incorrect downvote and move on or reply with correct information and move on. We don't need to censor or circle jerk here. If you mean ban posts by MRA's that are essentially making fun of tumblerites and whatnot, hmmm still no. "Women behaving badly" posts are necessary for the MRM to showcase common misconceptions held about the way women behave. If it's a low quality post like "lol look at this…
/r/MensRights30/03/14 05:21 PM
8

Yes I have. I suggest you not worry about it overmuch. It's exactly this type of treatment that brings people to the movement. Anyone with a shred of credibility who looks at that and then looks at the actual MRM will see they've been lied to and want to know why. Digging deeper is a good thing and it can only help us.
/r/MensRights30/03/14 03:14 PM
6

What do you think about feminists protesting MRA talks and presentations at universities?
/r/MensRights30/03/14 01:30 PM
4

Skimmed the post, seems like a nutjob. Would not pay them any mind unless they're getting loads of traffic.
/r/MensRights30/03/14 08:06 AM
0

There's a lot of ways you could approach it. My preferred method is hours worked. On average men work more hours, so they get paid more money. It's the simplest way to explain why two different people who have the same job and get paid the same amount will make different amounts of money. If the person you're talking to wants to know more then just slowly start digging into the differences between men and women on average such as education, experience, etc. You'll have to do your homework obviou…
/r/MensRights30/03/14 08:01 AM
5

while this is true, I wouldn't mind being a shark if I had to be an animal and not a human. Sharks are pretty bad ass.
/r/MensRights29/03/14 04:16 PM
12

After going through the video a couple times I have to wonder...was there any particular reason the protesters weren't removed? It's a noble thing to give one's political opponents the opportunity to air their grievances when they refuse to extend you the same courtesy. But at the same time something that was said in the video stuck with me. Some of the people there surely traveled to attend the event and in the end they traveled for nothing. When security was called why were the noisemakers not…
/r/MensRights29/03/14 12:13 PM
2

And then check it again. Seriously this time.
/r/MensRights29/03/14 03:55 AM
1

Mmm no, calling out Feminism for the misogyny it exhibits as well as the misandry helps loosen it's grip on the mainstream (see: RAAIN's recent statement on "rape culture") and further the fight for the rights of people everywhere, including men. If you don't understand this I'd say you have a fundamental misunderstanding of what this movement is. It's not all inclusive but it's not isolated to just men either. It is a human rights movement and a very large part of that is combating Feminism, an…
/r/MensRights24/03/14 01:37 AM
1

It's a perfect example of how Feminism actually holds little regard for women. It is merely an ideology. The Pro lifers were girls but the feminist professor had zero problem with censoring their voices and destroying their sign. Not to mention physically assaulting one of the girls.
/r/MensRights24/03/14 12:04 AM
-1

I know right? They even dared to kill a woman just to get that dirty male growing in her womb.
/r/MensRights11/03/14 04:01 PM
5

Great point Reyeko.
/r/MensRights07/03/14 02:41 PM
1

Why would you submit a screenshot from 6 months ago? Edit: Sorry that came off wrong. I mean what made you decide to submit it now?
/r/MensRights05/03/14 05:12 PM
14

I got different results.
/r/MensRights05/03/14 03:47 PM
5

Yeah I'm not seeing how this relates to Men's Rights. Can you clarify?
/r/MensRights05/03/14 12:33 PM
-1

Bad decision. A large portion of the MRM is in pointing out how things aren't fair. You're lucky you didn't end up losing your job or with a law suit. In the future I suggest not "joking" in such a manner with your coworkers. As you get older this type of behavior will become less and less acceptable and one day the woman doing this to you could be your boss or someone with your bosses ear. Don't give in to the desire to reciprocate because "it's not fair women can do it and men can't". No, it's…
/r/MensRights03/03/14 01:38 PM
2

Doesn't bother me in the least bit. As long as they don't vote brigade they're welcome here.
/r/MensRights03/03/14 04:34 AM
8

Oh I'm sorry, you have to pay to get "teaching lessons" or somesuch right? Same scam, different method. You're paying for someone to feed you bullshit. It's pathetic if you ask me. Anyone that has to charge for advice is nothing more than a con artist.
/r/MensRights02/03/14 04:12 AM
22

Manhood academy isn't interested in discussing the topics of the sub. They're interested in trolling and discrediting the MRM to sell their ebook. That's why they get "censored". Act like normal people and discuss the topic and you have nothing to worry about. Edit: In case anyone is still confused, this is why Manhood Academy participants get "censored". This too.
/r/MensRights02/03/14 03:06 AM
0

Please see my response to /u/Ooshkii. The cells are part of something alive, otherwise they wouldn't be cells.
/r/MensRights27/02/14 09:16 AM
0

That's like saying your foot is not you. It's just "a living thing". Well I guess it's ok for someone to chop it off right? "You" are somewhere in the electrical pulses in your brain. Note: I am not trying to start a debate about abortion. We could all do that anywhere and I think it has nothing to do with men's rights. I am just particularly confused by what this feminist said and honestly I feel your explanation just as lacking.
/r/MensRights27/02/14 09:13 AM
-2

Wait...if the rationale for abortion being ok is that the fetus isn't a living person...how can it have a sex? How can something that is not alive have a sex? And if it does have a sex doesn't it follow that it is a living being? I am really having trouble trying to wrap my head around this.
/r/MensRights27/02/14 07:45 AM
3

Wow that's awesome. How many of you wrote in?
/r/MensRights27/02/14 04:27 AM
1

I'm pretty sure most of the people in this thread are spinning this wrong. You're all reading too much into the "domestic dispute" part and I know the kinds of (well deserved) images it's putting in your mind. In this case the mother slapped the daughter, the police were called and when they arrived they wanted to talk to the mother, the father got between them and their target and so they beat him to death. It wasn't a matter of taking a woman's side in a domestic dispute. This is just a great …
/r/MensRights27/02/14 12:33 AM
1

What if there was a Men's rights movement 30 years go The Men's Movement has been around in some form for longer than 30 years. It's just most men's advocates were also fairly polite and so were ignored.
/r/MensRights24/02/14 10:37 AM
1

Never heard the comparison made before, don't think anything of it.
/r/MensRights24/02/14 10:35 AM
1

I'm not the one who described it as "overwhelming majority". Also I believe the split is somewhat misleading. Like I said this is kind of a different discussion but I'm not sure that it's fair to call someone who plays primarily mobile/puzzle games a gamer in the same sense as people who play WoW, SC, COD, TES, Pokemon, FF, KH, Fallout, Mario, RE, GoW, etc, etc. You know, the best gaming has to offer? Things like Angry Birds, while fun, are a very small piece of gaming and if that's all one play…
/r/MensRights22/02/14 08:28 PM
1

Yes ok, no one is literally questioning her "right" to actually do it. What Typhon is trying to say is it's a dick move to go into a medium you don't like or care about and try to change it to suit yourself.
/r/MensRights22/02/14 08:13 PM
1

Honestly, I haven't looked into statistics concerning development but I'm confident in my answers regardless. I know men are the primary purchasers and players of games, although women might come close(r?) to equal when it comes to mobile games. Whether playing mobile games qualifies one as a gamer is another discussion entirely. As for Anita, I sincerely doubt she even plays games "occasionally". I'm sorry but she said she doesn't play games on video. She kind of loses all her gamer cred right …
/r/MensRights22/02/14 08:38 AM
9

What problems do you have with the way she presents her arguments? Probably the fact that she steals footage from other content creators, bills herself as a gamer when she's admitted on film she doesn't play video games, made money off her arguments instead of presenting them for free like most people on youtube do. Does she misrepresent the games? Yes. I have a problem with people saying women are too stupid for STEM, too weak for the army, aren't dying enough in the workplace, are lying about …
/r/MensRights22/02/14 04:01 AM
6

Is it an overwhelming majority of males playing? Yes. Is it an overwhelming majority of males in the industry producing games? I think this is more varied but men are probably still a majority in the industry, yes. Is it that all games are supposed to be male centered? No. So, what is video gaming? A hobby.
/r/MensRights22/02/14 03:45 AM
12

Video Gaming is a male centered hobby. Anita Sarkeesian and other feminists have injected themselves into it and demanded change based on Feminist talking points. They are not gamers and do not deserve a voice in the community until they put in their dues (time and money). We don't go to malls and demand they carry more hardware and less clothing stores. Same shit. It may not necessarily be an issue of "rights" but it is of interest to many on this sub if for no other reason than to fight femini…
/r/MensRights21/02/14 11:43 PM
5

That's rough man. My friend was almost in that exact same position pretty much. Dunno what to say but here's a tip. If you would like to be present when she brings the child in for testing you may want to notify the people where you make the appointment. My friend had an appointment made for him and his Ex and the child to all come in and get the testing done but she came in a day early and made up some BS so they'd just do her part (or rather the child's part) early just so my friend wouldn't g…
/r/MensRights20/02/14 12:44 AM
0

Could try Egalitarian if you like.
/r/MensRights18/02/14 06:15 PM
13

Gotta know how to work the system. Put your money in a nickel machine and play once or twice per drink. Granted after you get drunk you'll probably head to the tables and blow all your money anyway but still, it was free-ish at the time.
/r/MensRights17/02/14 08:38 PM
19

Go to Vegas. If you visit the right casinos the cocktail waitresses have pretty revealing outfits and the drinks are free.
/r/MensRights17/02/14 07:40 PM
-8

I gotta disagree. They are targeted for being gay not for being men, correct? I think the fact that you posted this comment means you knew it wasn't on topic.
/r/MensRights17/02/14 07:38 PM
5

Don't step into the lion's den and expect fair treatment.
/r/MensRights15/02/14 05:06 PM
3

Lifetime alimony isn't uncommon.
/r/MensRights14/02/14 05:11 AM
4

Is a tax bonus worth lifetime alimony and/or child support? And that's if you aren't just accused of child abuse or DV and sent to jail on your spouses word.
/r/MensRights14/02/14 01:18 AM
13

I think you're only looking at half the picture. Marriage is just as much of a scam for men these days. You're best off, if you want children, either adopting by yourself or perhaps saving money for surrogacy. Even if you found the perfect woman, the State has given her a gun and anyone who truly loves you would not enter into a relationship where that will always be between you.
/r/MensRights13/02/14 08:22 PM
0

Didn't the value of bitcoins drop recently?
/r/MensRights12/02/14 12:44 PM
4

Did she just say the wage gap is negligible? Wow, great decent coverage. Edit: NAFALT argument used. Nevermind the coverage was just ok.
/r/MensRights08/02/14 10:41 PM
1

Simply put, the wage gap exists because men work more hours than women. There are other factors involved but that is the simplest way I can put it.
/r/MensRights06/02/14 11:37 AM
1

I think speculation might just reveal our worst fears and give them ideas. I'd rather just deal with what comes then speculate about what might happen.
/r/MensRights05/02/14 06:38 PM
7

Don't worry about what some guy who makes a webcomic thinks, focus on the bigger picture.
/r/MensRights04/02/14 09:08 AM
2

Did you hear what Laci Green said about male sexuality?
/r/MensRights04/02/14 09:05 AM
13

Well done Men's Rights Sydney for putting a bee in that cunts bonnet.
/r/MensRights03/02/14 03:34 PM
3

Love RBK. He has the perfect blend of comedy and seriousness imo.
/r/MensRights03/02/14 03:26 PM
1

I think this more an example of ageism than anything else, feeling sorry for the elderly. Also it says no charges have been filed yet not that they wont be at all.
/r/PussyPass03/02/14 06:37 AM
1

Well of course, that is what he does. I'm just saying there was a nugget of truth in there. The best lies have'em. For example the wage gap. It exists, that is true. The lie is that it's caused by discrimination.
/r/MensRights02/02/14 01:35 AM
2

There should really be squeezed into the FAQ or something because it comes up a lot.
/r/MensRights01/02/14 09:42 AM
3

I don't suppose they get a refund when the feminists don't come knocking eh? No? Fucking bullshit.
/r/MensRights31/01/14 11:08 PM
3

While the comment was pretty stupid he does edge on a good point, in that it is all relative. Basically do men's punishments fit the crime or do women's? All we want with regards to sentencing is equality right?
/r/MensRights31/01/14 11:04 PM
1

I'm not sure.
/r/MensRights30/01/14 09:15 PM
1

I see what you're saying. I guess it's more of a "they should care, but they don't" type of situation.
/r/MensRights30/01/14 08:46 AM
3

Yes. It's discrimination by sex. You're not allowed to deny female teachers jobs there if the positions are open and if they apply. I suppose there would be nothing illegal with trying to get men to apply...but it would definitely look bad and be spun as sexism by the media. No school would ever allow such a thing.
/r/MensRights30/01/14 08:44 AM
4

Nice find.
/r/MensRights30/01/14 07:14 AM
2

Not bashing the idea but as it stands you'd get a couple thousand people at the very best. MRA's are just not ready to take on fights in an organized fashion.
/r/MensRights30/01/14 05:42 AM
10

I think the court costs of having it done later should the need arise sort of cancel that out.
/r/MensRights30/01/14 05:09 AM
21

I can't think of any reason not to.
/r/MensRights30/01/14 02:37 AM
1

It's sort of self descriptive. Was there something specific you wanted to know about?
/r/MensRights30/01/14 12:32 AM
2

A colored woman is more or less a man? I think not
/r/MensRights30/01/14 12:22 AM
-2

Gender neutral language is often the most insidious. On paper it all looks nice and fair, who could object? In practice it's almost always used against men. Don't be fooled into thinking what's on paper is going to reflect what will happen in a real world setting. If things like that were true feminism really would be about equality.
/r/MensRights30/01/14 12:13 AM
6

The general premise is that women are being discriminated against with regards to pay. When all factors are taken into account (education, time spent working, etc) it is found to be a false premise.
/r/MensRights29/01/14 07:08 AM
5

I'm not sure that I agree with that. It may be a bit dated but I think the reflection is still fairly accurate.
/r/MensRights28/01/14 09:00 PM
0

I don't agree. Whether the mainstream embraces the MRM or not, there is a need for it.
/r/MensRights28/01/14 01:42 AM
2

I don't see a problem with it. Whether people are judging each other using apps, Facebook photos, or plain old gossip that is what people will do. I wonder what you think of gay people using the same apps. Is that just as disgusting to you?
/r/MensRights28/01/14 01:40 AM
1

There is already a thread about this. http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1w9y0x/the_creator_of_xkcd_doesnt_want_rxkcd_associated/
/r/MensRights28/01/14 01:35 AM
1

It'd be cool if someone could get a clarifying comment because the way I read it he doesn't want someone in charge of an xkcd community because they link to very unrelated things. Does xkcd really have anything to do with conspiracy or men's rights? Not that I can see.
/r/MensRights28/01/14 01:01 AM
2

Anyone with an ounce of logic should know this is bunk without having to even read an explanation. If you aren't convicted of a crime you are not officially a criminal. That isn't to say there aren't criminals that don't get away with their crimes, just that you cannot account for them in a statistic like this. As an aside even if there were any validity to this claim the United States justice system (and really most of the western world) is built on the idea that it is BETTER that 10 criminals …
/r/MensRights27/01/14 04:06 AM
21

I'd love to see a feminist try to defend that.
/r/MensRights18/01/14 01:46 PM
2

Personally I think it's a trap in the same way The Good Men project and White Ribbon Campaign are traps. The message will ultimately be about how men and/or MRA's are "not helping" and what they can do to better serve Feminism and their "own interests" by smashing the Patriarchy™. A reframing of the issues and the players to put men on the spot. I would go anyway just to see though just to see.
/r/MensRights16/01/14 12:45 PM
1

If an allegation of a criminally serious nature is made such as rape, how is the law enforcement not running the show? Let's say you and I meet on the street. We say hello and begin a conversation. I don't like what you're talking about and slug you in the arm. You decide it's not worth your trouble to call the police but you want to let people know I'm a violent conversationalist, so you take my picture and put up flyers all around that neighborhood. It works something like that. Basically ther…
/r/MensRights16/01/14 12:37 PM
1

Elam is controlled opposition? Never heard that one before.
/r/MensRights10/01/14 02:26 PM
1

Ummm where's the question? Seems like you're just saying the side bar could use a clean up.
/r/MensRights25/12/13 02:17 AM
3

It really depends on where you live I think and probably even the specific high school you go to within your area. When I was in high school boys and girls both wore pajamas and no one cared.
/r/MensRights25/12/13 12:45 AM
1

Oddly enough I submitted a fake report as Thorin Oakenshield from the Hobbit and reported Smaug the dragon lol.
/r/MensRights17/12/13 03:49 PM
3

Feminist site, don't get sucked into the rhetoric.
/r/MensRights12/12/13 10:29 PM
5

http://i.imgur.com/4cgf4Zo.jpg
/r/MensRights01/12/13 08:33 PM
2

Love RBK's videos.
/r/MensRights01/12/13 06:13 AM
8

Annnnnnd here's a source (the SPLC itself) disproving that lie. It should be mentioned that the SPLC did not label MRAs as members of a hate movement; nor did our article claim that the grievances they air on their websites – false rape accusations, ruinous divorce settlements and the like – are all without merit. NEXT!
/r/MensRights27/11/13 04:16 AM
24

Comment on sexist trend Not all women are like that stop generalizing! | Wow what a bunch of pigs!
/r/MensRights26/11/13 03:25 PM
1

Even if those women were feminists (which is not evident in the video) at least do everyone the courtesy of putting stuff like this in /r/mensrants in the future. We're trying to foster a more equal and less hateful society, not "piss off feminists".
/r/MensRights25/11/13 06:16 PM
-1

I tend to think of them as the angry and misguided cousins. They see the truth of the world same as us but instead of just trying to make the world a better place they are vulgar and angry and advocate mistreating others. We do not support them.
/r/MensRights21/11/13 11:02 AM
6

Hmmm lesse what shining examples can I personally find by browsing the hashtag myself. Oh thank GOD there is finally a day where we can celebrate MEN, the most marginalized of the genders #InternationalMensDay #sarcasm Retweeted 151 times How nice. Celebrate #internationalmensday by donating to @Womens_Aid and helping to end male violence against women Because we can't want people to help men in any way shape or form can we? Oh no, I missed #internationalmensday! Oh well, I’m sure there’s anothe…
/r/MensRights21/11/13 10:57 AM
2

In all honesty...I wish that group wasn't shut down and that I could have my fair say as well. I understand the point of holding Facebook to the same standard it's set for "protecting" women. I just wish we could all say whatever we want regardless of how politically incorrect it is. I guess Facebook isn't the site for that.
/r/MensRights15/11/13 12:40 AM
14

Well first of all 99% of the damage has already been done and there's not much you can do besides plead with her or go to court. From the way you put things it seems like the original deal was that you two were supposed to go your separate ways and that the only stipulation was that you were supposed to meet the child sometime in the distant future if they wanted. Then you got into the idea of actually being a dad, which is fine and great and I fully support that. But that wasn't really part of …
/r/MensRights12/11/13 11:04 AM
1

I think it's important to understand what it means when we're calling these things fiction. The characters, events, places, etc aren't all real and may not have ever existed in any form other than in the authors head. But, knowing that authors often interject their own beliefs into their work, it is entirely possible and even likely I would argue that these works are not JUST fiction but fantasy. That is to say, Dworkin's characters are expressing her true beliefs and the things she wish she cou…
/r/MensRights12/11/13 05:46 AM
26

There is a difference between people who say they were raped, people who feminists say were raped, and people who actually report being raped to the police. It's always important to realize where exactly these numbers are coming from and how they are counted.
/r/MensRights12/11/13 01:22 AM
1

Why would you judge them based on what they tell you they are? That's like asking the KKK what they are about. They'll tell you they're all about equality (for the white race). TGMP shows it's true colors right in the name. "Men are broken and need to be fixed to be good men". If you need more than that read more than a few of their articles. Like I said once in awhile they throw a bone but the bias becomes clear pretty quickly. If you want to read more detailed accounts and observations check o…
/r/MensRights09/11/13 11:30 AM
-1

You really shouldn't be concerned with their judgment. Or anyone's for that matter. If you can't handle being thought of as a crazy asshole this subreddit probably isn't for you.
/r/MensRights02/11/13 10:14 PM
8

I almost feel like /r/science 's response was a subtle dig. "Oh it's not fair to represent a mix of famous scientists on our banner? Here sweetie let's change that to all women for you. Better now?"
/r/MensRights02/11/13 10:08 PM
1

Even if it was (which I doubt) the goals of TGMP is to undermine this movement and push it towards a feminist friendly direction. Don't let the candy in one hand distract you from the knife in the other.
/r/MensRights31/10/13 01:55 AM
3

Feminist propaganda site. Don't waste time on it.
/r/MensRights30/10/13 05:52 PM
5

I wouldn't go to a mediator, even if you didn't have such trouble facing her. In my experience mediators are not helpful nor do they care about your situation. This is from a US perspective though.
/r/MensRights28/10/13 04:06 PM
3

I think quotes from prominent feminists (Andrea Dworkin talking about a dead man with an apple shoved in his mouth like a pig comes to mind) proves misandry is real. The fact that you need to prove a concept like that is real to people is proof in itself though imo.
/r/MensRights28/10/13 04:00 PM
1

I like how your statistics were all wrong because she says so.
/r/MensRights27/10/13 02:59 PM
10

Men's Rights trending on twitter? Sounds like a win to me.
/r/MensRights24/10/13 09:39 PM
5

If I had to choose an "heir" to AVFM in particular (no one has a claim on the entire MRM as far as I'm concerned) it would probably be Karen (GWW) or Dean Esmay. Karen has the followers on Youtube but I have no idea if she's capable of managing the business aspects of AVFM. I don't know if Dean does either to be fair but he does seem to be Paul's right hand man these days so I assume he knows what's up and he seems pretty level headed most of the time.
/r/MensRights20/10/13 04:56 AM
10

It was really fair to start out with. While I'd rather not be associated with PUA/Redpill and people like that the hard truth is we are because of our shared dislike of feminism. There is nothing to do but acknowledge the association and tell anyone who will listen that while they may be our "cousins" we don't agree with what they do or say. But then the article devolved and started making a lot of assumptions instead of being objective. For example it cites the cancelled debate "Has feminism go…
/r/MensRights20/10/13 04:51 AM
8

Looks like they pulled it.
/r/MensRights19/10/13 03:21 PM
3

Uhhh...thank you?
/r/MensRights19/10/13 03:11 PM
1

What is missing is her face. On this particular cut of the video yes. The unedited video is elsewhere on the internet and both of their faces are shown. In fact she has been fully doxxed. Her name is known as well as various social media accounts. at 1:50, he kisses her face IIRC they don't actually kiss
/r/MensRights19/10/13 01:43 AM
1

Are you going to be covering the new case in Ohio?
/r/MensRights18/10/13 11:49 AM
5

am I missing anything else? Sure. The fact that she uses clips out of context to misrepresent what is actually happening in a game. The fact that some of her assertions in her video series puts her at odds with her own masters thesis. That she ignores males in video games are killed/abused/maimed more violently and at a higher rate than women. How many games actually do in fact include female protagonists. I could go on but anyone who wants more after reading these comments should just go to you…
/r/MensRights18/10/13 09:27 AM
2

Pretty much this.
/r/MensRights18/10/13 09:17 AM
25

Walking around alone and feeling comfortable Nope. As a young man with no car who lives in a bad area and often takes the bus to get around I can say with certainty that women do not have a monopoly in feeling like they have to keep their guard up when travelling alone. Why this person feels comfortable doing this now that they're consider themselves a man I don't understand. Maybe it was a self confidence thing rather than a "better safe than sorry" thing. bitchy face The male equivalent would …
/r/MensRights18/10/13 09:16 AM
10

Anita Sarkeesian should be given no credit because she is a lying con artist first and foremost. I still can't believe any organization gives her the time of day let alone features her in a piece like this. The murder fantasy fanfic thing is just icing on the cake.
/r/MensRights17/10/13 11:58 PM
2

Rape is not derailing men's issues. Rape is a men's issue. Men are the majority of rape victims due to the prevalence in the prison systems and yet it goes largely unrecognized by society. Kindly fuck off with this false flag shit to make us look bad, asshole.
/r/MensRights17/10/13 04:31 PM
2

Fair enough, but having frequented 4chan myself from time to time I have to wonder how anyone knew it was her. Unless she posted a pic of herself with a timestamp it could have been anyone.
/r/MensRights17/10/13 12:05 PM
2

I've never actually seen any solid proof of that. Do you have any or are you just repeating the same rumor I've heard before?
/r/MensRights17/10/13 08:48 AM
2

http://www.youtube.com/user/manwomanmyth
/r/MensRights15/10/13 07:21 AM
2

That is pretty strange. The titles don't seem at all misleading.
/r/MensRights11/10/13 10:33 AM
2

Well that's the kick. When you argue with and debunk feminists you have to remember you aren't doing it for them or for you. You're doing it for people that don't know the issues or are undecided. You want to sway them. By all means try to sway feminists as well if you want but as most of us know that is usually next to impossible. As for having counters in the FAQ. I guess that could be a good idea. If you really want to pursue that I'd suggest messaging the moderators about it.
/r/MensRights11/10/13 08:10 AM
10

I don't like that idea. Maybe you don't want to debunk something that has been debunked thousands of times before but others are willing to do it every day if need be. And I completely understand that it's not your thing. But you wont be able to ban this argument in the real world and it's better that we constantly sharpen the counterarguments and keep them ready until they are needed. Like the wage gap=discrimination myth debunking feminist lies is just part of the game here.
/r/MensRights10/10/13 08:57 AM
0

The game is rigged against MRAs, but that doesn't mean I can't play along within the system to pursue my goals. Reminds me of my favorite quote: "I know it's crooked, but it's the only game in town."
/r/MensRights09/10/13 10:45 PM
5

women are shown as "adulterers, prostitutes, and weak characters" And men were shown as violent murdering thieves, among other things. Seems to me the game is just dirty and didn't play favorites. It's a game about being a criminal, who is going to come out of that looking good?
/r/MensRights02/10/13 12:02 AM
1

Oh well don't go straight for it obviously. Ask and offer your hand. If they don't want to embrace you that is ok. Especially if a camera is recording.
/r/MensRights29/09/13 04:56 PM
12

The quote is "First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win." Seems to me we're leaving the laughing stage and entering the fighting stage.
/r/MensRights29/09/13 08:11 AM
7

Offer handshakes and hugs. They may be our enemies in a way but we don't need to hate them in turn. If we continue to show kindness and compassion for all people that message will eventually shine through the lies anyone chooses to tell about us.
/r/MensRights29/09/13 08:08 AM
3

It's a little upsetting that the most exposure our issues have right now is through comedians.
/r/MensRights27/09/13 07:58 AM
3

Another version: http://i.imgur.com/qbPpt2o.png
/r/MensRights16/09/13 11:37 AM
3

It bugged me at first as well but in the context of the show it's really not that odd. Walter Jr was probably panicking and seeing his dad as the bad guy regardless of what just happened with the knife so when he called the cops the first thing he could think to say that would get them there ASAP was that his dad attacked his mom with a weapon. If he'd said something like "my parents are fighting oh and my dad might be a murdering drug lord" or somesuch it's entirely possible that in Walt Jr's m…
/r/MensRights16/09/13 11:33 AM
3

Left and Right are really at the heart of the MRM IMO. Generally speaking the Left is engaged in the same sort of Cultural Marxism that feminists are. Feminism is just a specific offshoot of the Left. Feminism is married to the Welfare State, they cannot exist in power without it strongarming men out of their own families and forcing men to provide for their former wives and their children under threat of imprisonment while giving nothing back. The Right contends that the State should not have t…
/r/MensRights15/09/13 05:46 AM
1

The different prices make sense...I guess. But what's what the difference in the service charge?
/r/MensRights08/09/13 09:07 PM
1

Probably nothing. You could maybe make a case with the whole Mcdonalds thing but honestly 1 day a week is not going to effect her diet so that's her mothers responsibility. My point was that even IF she was right about everything she was needlessly hostile and unprofessional.
/r/MensRights08/09/13 08:47 PM
14

I can't watch this without getting angry. Even if that lady in purple is 100% right about everything, she's still needlessly hostile and frankly acting like a total bitch. This is what happens when you give bad people even a modicum of power over others. They use it to bully.
/r/MensRights07/09/13 09:15 AM
2

Even though AVFM actually denies the role, it is the defacto mouthpiece whether anyone likes it or not. This subreddit is really the only thing that comes close and as we all know it's a lot less focused in it's message. I'm curious, if the MSM was going to pick ONE organization to do a piece on who would you choose to represent the MRM? The Good Men Project? Manhood Academy? Be glad AVFM is getting some air time. It could be much worse than whatever you think is wrong with them.
/r/MensRights24/08/13 07:40 PM
8

The "red pill" is a term used in various places on the internet. It is a reference to the movie The Matrix in which Morpheus offers Neo the choice to take either a red pill or a blue. The red pill will wake him up from The Matrix while the blue pill will let him continue living the lie inside The Matrix. When people talk about taking the red pill they are talking about being awakened from the lies and misconceptions most people live with in their day to day lies. To "red pill" someone is to chal…
/r/MensRights19/08/13 12:06 AM
8

Wait...what is the point of propagating false information? Reddit's "men's rights" subforum was identified by the Southern Poverty Law Center among a list of misogynistic websites in the spring 2012 issue of its Intelligence Report, which said that the subreddit propagates conspiracy theories about feminism and demonstrates anger towards programs that help women.[39][40] Blah blah /r/Mensrights is a hate group the SPLC said so! The SPLC later made this statement in regard to the subreddit: "It's…
/r/MensRights18/08/13 10:51 PM
1

Simpsons and Family Guy were intended to be parodies of this formula, btw. Really? That's very interesting if true. Do you have a source to back that up?
/r/MensRights18/08/13 10:34 PM
3

Well if we're just going to talk about cartoon sitcoms, to be fair, King of the Hill is an example of the opposite. Peggy is absolutely the "bumbling wife". I'm not someone who takes offense at media nor do I believe it has a negative impact on society though. You can depict people however you want as far as I'm concerned and if I don't like it I wont watch.
/r/MensRights18/08/13 08:58 PM
12

That is insane. I went hiking once one summer when I was younger with my uncle on the Pacific Crest Trail and if something like this had happened I would be furious. If they had walking gear and all he asked was if they could cut through the property it should be pretty damn obvious that he isn't up to something and certainly not abducting a child to rape or whatever. Just absolutely insane.
/r/MensRights18/08/13 12:09 AM
4

Feminism may have some things right. Hatred of the "privileged" is not one of them. It's just Marxism rebranded and applied to sex.
/r/MensRights16/08/13 06:04 PM
10

Absolutely. I tend to highly value the experience of people that lived through the different waves of feminism and saw it's effects.
/r/MensRights10/08/13 12:38 PM
1

Considering she was getting death threats I think it's natural to assume the same people making the threats shot her dog. Don't you?
/r/MensRights10/08/13 12:21 PM
1

Ah I didn't realize the dog survived, thanks for clearing that up.
/r/MensRights10/08/13 12:20 PM
42

The MRM doesn't do anything in real life. False. It's not a big movement so it's impact is limited but there are genuine activists who do what they can. There have been at least a few cases where the MRM has petitioned companies for sexist advertisements or judges for improper behavior. Recently the poster campaign "Don't be that girl" made a pretty big splash in Canada. It's not much but it's something. You are relegated to internet forums and commenting on blogs or youtube videos because your …
/r/MensRights09/08/13 03:23 PM
5

Community of people (mostly anti creationist atheists I think) that pride themselves on thinking logically that have already been infiltrated by feminists. I guess the feminists are going for the gusto and trying to destroy it now that they've been on the inside for awhile.
/r/MensRights09/08/13 11:54 AM
4

Came into the thread to say this, glad it was said already.
/r/MensRights09/08/13 08:41 AM
2

Well that's not insulting or sexist at all. /s
/r/MensRights08/08/13 03:17 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter