TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

INxP Archive

View 0 posts and 116 comments by INxP on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Yours must be among the most outlandish definitions of normalcy I've ever seen.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/21 03:45 AM
11

If you ever feel like changing careers, you'd make a great Benevolent AI that ends up destroying humanity due to someone's carelessly worded request for something very small and inconsequential. I'd watch that movie (probably starred by Tom Cruise, because who else).
/r/PussyPassDenied07/07/21 04:14 PM
1

-Richard P. Feynman, PhD Wouldn't dare call him an idiot though! Never seen an idiot play bongo drums like he does.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/06/21 08:27 PM
1

I don't use Bumble so correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't swiping right just a sign that you would be interested in the person in the picture, not really you trying to guess whether or not they would be interested in you? Or maybe I'm just totally out of the loop and the dating game has already gone literally that meta.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/04/21 05:16 PM
1

I'd think it's obviously just a play on "Guys under 6 feet don't bother" and stuff like that that some women have on their dating site profiles. Not to be taken quite that literally or at face value.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/04/21 05:06 PM
10

OKCupid used to have a pretty interesting blog with all kinds of statistics about their user base, sounds like the kind of a finding they might've published. (Obviously most people will never admit to money or race being huge factors, but their behavior will still tell what they refuse to say out loud.)
/r/PussyPassDenied25/03/21 05:07 PM
43

180 cm is probably the most common threshold used if one is used. Which is about 5'11", so in that sense a bit more forgiving, but also you may be even more screwed if you don't reach it. Someone who really wants a tall guy might even aim for 190 cm (a little over 6'2"). Generally though, there isn't such a clear threshold in metric. Some women just use their own height +10 or 20 cm, or whatever they consider adequate. Disclaimer: I don't even use Tinder, so this is basically grandpa talk from m…
/r/PussyPassDenied25/03/21 05:00 PM
7

One man generalizing about women proves that Feminists are right in whatever they're generalizing about men (and/or MRAs and/or women and/or everything else)? Yeah, how about no.
/r/MensRights21/03/21 09:38 PM
5

As far as I can tell the ad is specifically about child abductions, not homicides. The numbers regarding the sex/gender of the perpetrator in that type of crimes are much more even, and apparently even more female for certain types of abductions. See for example: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12147-000-0011-4 Meanwhile the public discourse and common stereotypes hardly reflect this. Women and girls are almost solely portrayed as the victim (and the victims almost solely as women or …
/r/PussyPass20/03/21 11:58 AM
2

See it's not systemic like misogynism, racism, The Patriarchy, the male gaze, unwanted advances, mansprearing and mansplaining and... well, all that other stuff that my tribe's always foaming about. And what exactly do I mean by systemic, you ask? Like is it some official law or policy? Well of course not, then this would kind of have to count too, along with VAWA and a lot of other stuff. And I don't really want them to count. But thanks for asking. OK then, just something very widespread, done…
/r/PussyPass12/03/21 05:02 AM
11

That isn't even something negative about women, but something negative about our society as a whole. Often it's men who are most vehemently protecting and privileging girls and women over boys and other men.
/r/MensRights30/05/19 06:06 PM
1

Born in 1989 he's, like, 11 and change, right? I mean genuinely 1989 to 2000 still feels like the period when each year actually meant something, after that it's just this weird, indistinct time sausage blur that signifies nothing. I know it makes no sense but that's how it feels. Obviously was very young myself at the time.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/05/19 04:40 PM
19

"...while keeping silent and holding their legs tight together." I guess there's something to be said about gazing long into an abyss by these activists fighting the evils of oppressive patriarchy.
/r/MensRights12/05/19 07:50 PM
5

Sounds very much like the postmodernist mindset in a nutshell. Not doing too well? Ah, all the evidence you need that someone's wrongfully keeping you down! Case closed, now go claim your free Victim Pass from the nearest social media outlet.
/r/PussyPass27/02/19 08:35 AM
0

Something to keep in mind though: as a physician, for obvious reasons you wouldn't typically have to treat victims of anything but the worst kind of physical abuse -- that's quite a steep sample selection bias, and unlikely to give you a very representative picture of the whole spectrum of DV, which for most people involved doesn't lead into permanent patterns of physical abuse that actually require (repeatedly) contacting a physician. The "well-known fact" that every isolated case of DV is a su…
/r/MensRights02/10/14 08:51 AM
3

Sad but true. I'm about as far from a manly macho man as one can get, yet it took me a complete breakdown and loss of my ability to work to get even a proper diagnosis (let alone any kind of treatment) for the depression I've lived with for about 15 years. Anecdotal evidence is anecdotal, and I would hope not everyone is as stubborn about "walking it off" on their own, but I know the emotional barriers involved -- internalized attitudes, social stigma, all that jazz -- a bit too intimately to as…
/r/MensRights02/10/14 07:28 AM
23

Comes to mind: Winston
/r/MensRights14/09/14 11:28 AM
6

The Gender War ("Könskriget") is a pretty grim but nevertheless interesting documentary about Swedish feminism in particular. Quite long at almost two hours, but the first few minutes should suffice to give some idea of what's to come.
/r/MensRights13/09/14 11:45 PM
1

I'm actually inclined to believe that one at least really is trolling, based on the sheer ignorance of the comment alone. I mean.. anyone can't really be that thick, can they? Are these in any way verified as real people rather than sockpuppet accounts?
/r/MensRights15/06/14 04:55 AM
18

Way too many white people in jail too. There must be a better way. /s
/r/MensRights08/06/14 04:53 PM
1

Or rather that is the moral standard that men are held to, while the expectation may still be that most men will miserably fail to ever justify their sorry existence by fulfilling it, or any other role where they might actually benefit a real human being. A useless man is a worthless man, void of any inherent value.
/r/MensRights31/05/14 09:57 AM
1

Big country.
/r/MensRights31/05/14 07:12 AM
1

"Men weren't allowed to stay at the comfort of their home and expect their wives to labor in horrible conditions to earn a living for the entire family, because women were in control of things." I think either way to put it would be a gross oversimplification. If one side is truly in control of things, shouldn't they be free to choose what role they assume, and not be tied to theirs just as much as the "controlled" side?
/r/MensRights17/02/14 11:01 PM
2

He was an alcoholic, no doubt about that, but also had several non-writing jobs before and throughout his writing career. It's well known that even after gaining recognition and fame as a writer he worked as a mail carrier for several years and as a mail sorting clerk for about a decade. Either way, I don't think it likely that he aimed that particular sentence at wives or women in general. Not that that necessarily means it wouldn't be just as applicable to a leeching missis as it would to an e…
/r/MensRights15/02/14 03:07 PM
3

This was my first thought as well, or more specifically the employer in general, large corporation or not. I reckon it's somewhat less common and socially acceptable in the US to entertain such 'Marxist' or 'anti-capitalist' sentiments, whereas thinking of the government or the leeching missis as the main oppressor would have less 'un-American' undertones.
/r/MensRights15/02/14 02:50 PM
1

Misleading or ambiguous rather than factually incorrect, I'd say, as it does omit the "for the same job" part where the blatant falsity would come in. Of course we tend to just assume it's implied, which may or may not be exactly what the people repeating these statements aim for. (Disclaimer: Statistically men do work longer weeks and gravitate more towards the better paid fields, so consequently they do get paid more on the average, but not for the same job. To blindly assume that this salary …
/r/MensRights13/02/14 01:06 PM
61

1) Define rape as: male violence against women. 2) Find absolutely no evidence of women as perpetrators of: male violence against women. 3) Make a big point out of this truly surprising finding.
/r/MensRights19/02/13 07:44 AM
13

If women have the majority of votes, how on earth are they lacking political representation?
/r/MensRights24/12/12 08:40 AM
11

To be the devil's advocate, it does point out the double standard in the (common?) conception that women and their issues are supposed to be understood and accepted just as they are, without ever questioning their rightfulness or validity, while men on the other hand are expected to stoically just man up, suppress their own needs, desires and feelings, and do their duty for the benefit of their loved ones, or something along those lines. Not sure if the linked thread is relevant as anything more…
/r/MensRights20/12/12 08:10 PM
4

That said, some studies have concluded that taller men are more likely to get hired and promoted. Sadly I have no idea if the sex/gender of the people responsible for making the call has any effect on that. Of course it's likely subconscious in most circumstances, and a very competent short or average height person will still be able to get hired and promoted, but it's still a clear disadvantage, and not just in the dating scene (while of course making more money will grant another benefit to ta…
/r/MensRights01/11/12 07:32 PM
19

They're mostly men though, aren't they? (Or boys, whatever.)
/r/MensRights28/10/12 01:42 PM
1

both the girl and the guy were drunk in those situations so no one was "exploiting" the other as it were This is where many would disagree with you. I can't say I really follow the logic, but I've seen it happen in virtually every rape related discussion on this site anyway.
/r/MensRights28/10/12 12:00 AM
6

There doesn't even need to be memory loss or anything like that, according to quite a few people (who I'd like to think are just trolling, but it's really hard to tell). Nor does the woman involved have to regret anything or think of it as rape. The reasoning is that once you're intoxicated at all, you're simply incapable of consenting, hence anyone having any kind of sexual interaction with you is a rapist. And of course this only applies to women, drunken men are still just as responsible as e…
/r/MensRights27/10/12 08:37 AM
12

It's not the size, it's how you use it.
/r/MensRights27/10/12 05:35 AM
21

Possibly 8% of college men have had sex with an intoxicated woman, or something to that effect.
/r/MensRights27/10/12 05:16 AM
24

If 50% is equal then logically 100% is twice as equal. Why settle for anything less?
/r/MensRights24/10/12 09:04 AM
1

It's kind of misleading to name something freedom like that with the implication that forbidding it is somehow a net loss to the total amount of freedom we have. How about the freedom to drive drunk? Freedom to drug other people's drinks? Freedom to stab or shoot people you don't like or use threats of violence as a negotiation tactic? Freedom to lock other people in your basement for your own amusement? Freedom to bomb public buildings? Forbidding these things is also technically limiting our f…
/r/MensRights07/07/12 12:44 AM
5

Men in professional sports aren't average men by a long shot. They represent the very top end of physical fitness (strength, height, speed, stamina, hand-eye coordination, etc.). Most men would never make it in NFL/MLB/NBA/NHL/EPL or any other professional league. FWIW, most men would never make in any women's professional league either. They might do slightly less bad as they would in the equivalent men's league, but there's no way they would exceed every female athlete just because they're men…
/r/MensRights05/07/12 05:44 PM
1

On the average. It's not like every man (or boy) has more muscle mass than every woman (or girl), or vice versa. On the average men are also taller than women, but there are plenty of women taller than the average man, and plenty of men shorter than the average woman. For any individual case of two people fighting such statistical averages are completely irrelevant.
/r/MensRights05/07/12 05:30 PM
-1

Then I guess Germany would have never invaded Poland? OK, so technically it was a dictatorship, but no war can be successfully fared without strong public support, so the point stands. I think it's fundamentally an international thing and one of those matters of principle where short-sighted 'personal' gain isn't the main concern (i.e. the one thing even more important than my nation is the world as a whole). Every nation will gain more power from a bigger army and so on, but if every nation has…
/r/MensRights28/05/12 11:47 AM
5

Finland. As far as I know, Israel one of the very few (even the only one? no idea) countries where both sexes have to do a military service, so in that sense (gender equality, regarding the army anyway) it's pretty much the exact opposite.
/r/MensRights24/05/12 08:14 AM
5

There are also other places than the US, where the system is discriminatory in a very concrete manner. In my home country every healthy man (in the "fit for duty" sense) has exactly three choices: military service of 6 months or more, civil service that's about twice as long (basically about a year of unpaid work for some governmental or other accepted institution) or half a year in jail. Healthy women too can do a military service if they want to, which fact has been praised as a great step tow…
/r/MensRights24/05/12 03:56 AM
13

I see two possible ways of reading that quote: Men naturally disrespect the opposite sex, while women don't (because, well, men are just naturally flawed like that) Men disrespect women which is bad, and women also disrespect men but that's OK I don't even know which one is worse.
/r/MensRights11/05/12 07:32 PM
7

some statistics here found there are more females in reddit than men Source? I remember reading an article that concluded reddit to be one of the most male-dominated social sites. Granted that was a while ago, so things may have changed a bit since then. Might've been this one (from 2009).
/r/MensRights09/05/12 01:35 PM
1

As much as I admire John Lennon as a musician and an idealist, I don't think social psychology in any scientific sense was necessarily his strongest field. Of course the fame and prestige still adds a little sense of authority to any statement you can attribute to him, but that's basically all it does.
/r/MensRights09/05/12 03:28 AM
1

hostile to all feminists or feminist thought I'd say this will hold true to any less egalitarian gender essentialist feminist and the theories they promote -- dogmatic faith in the patriarchy theory (as opposed to kyriarchy or some other less binary and gender essentialist one), "men can't in any way be systematically oppressed because they're The Privileged Group", "misandry don't real in any way, shape or form", that sort of stuff -- but not so much for the (gender) egalitarian feminist who ac…
/r/MensRights06/05/12 04:04 PM
6

Equality of opportunity doesn't have to result in equality of results, 'equal' doesn't mean 'identical'. Something a lot of people forget with all their "These numbers for men and women are different, must be a result of discrimination somewhere".
/r/MensRights01/05/12 06:58 PM
6

And I don't think she did. But yes, it's not rare to see such double standards. I don't think the problem is that women aren't commonly blamed for their own victimization, but that men are and it's so widely accepted as nothing but "common sense". This goes for all victims of violence and other crimes as well. That's my take on it anyway. If someone has a more dog-eat-dog view, at least they should be consistent across genders and different types of crime or openly admit that there are double st…
/r/MensRights01/05/12 06:07 PM
-1

Can I just agree with both the guy perhaps being a bit unwise (then again, who the hell would be paranoid enough to expect something like that? not me) and it being victim blaming if anyone says that it was actually his own fault in any moral sense and/or that he deserved it? I think this is an important point to keep in mind: it's simply a false dichotomy that one needs to be a perfect and flawless being in order for someone else to be fully responsible for their wrongdoings. The world just isn…
/r/MensRights01/05/12 05:45 PM
1

What they likely mean is that no matter how much they outnumber you, they will always be oppressed by you, because patriarchy. On an island with 99 women and one man to shine their shoes, the man will still oppress the fuck out of everyone else, because patriarchy. Should you ask what it is or how it works, don't expect a real answer, but a lecture on 1 in 6 women this and 1 in 4 women that, because patriarchy, and that's that, or are you a rape apologist? Do you think rape is funny, huh? Didn't…
/r/MensRights01/05/12 01:06 PM
7

Legitimate or not, I think it's simply a dirty tactic. Especially when talking about an extremely emotional subject like rape. No matter how "legitimate", it will do nothing but make you look like a totally insensitive bully. I know it takes a great deal of patience, but I honestly believe that remaining calm and civil even against the worse bigots imaginable is the only way to not look like one yourself. I admit my own success rate in achieving this kind of zen isn't quite 100% yet, but that wo…
/r/MensRights01/05/12 12:27 PM
9

and if necessary make stuff up yourself Wait, what? Overall I agree on most parts, but this just doesn't sit well with me at all. A bad move on so many levels, and a completely unnecessary one. Shame them:- "Do you think you fathers, brothers, grandfathers think like that? Do you think Mr. [teachers name] thinks that?" and "Have you told your boyfriends what you think of them?" OK, this one too. Trying to give some perspective by reminding of the men they may love and esteem is one thing, and no…
/r/MensRights01/05/12 12:17 PM
16

She's a woman! I mean don't be silly, men don't even have feelings, do they? Even if they do they're all about raping and violating and oppressing and not checking their privilege.
/r/MensRights30/04/12 11:05 PM
0

I can even live with someone thinking men are more privileged than women, according to whatever facets they want to emphasize as the most important ones (as there really isn't any objective way to quantify all these qualitatively different phenomena). It's the kind of binary and all-permeating "men are privileged, women are oppressed" dichotomy that really bugs me.
/r/MensRights29/04/12 06:45 PM
2

Egalitarianism already is a relatively well-known term, and although it doesn't really directly imply any emphasis on gender matters, I think for most contexts it works pretty well, and certainly much better than feminism if we're talking about truly gender-neutral equality that's not built on a theoretical/intellectual framework that emphasizes just the female point of view (axiomatically assumed to be oppressed, underprivileged, etc.). Humanism would also be an option, but already has other me…
/r/MensRights12/04/12 07:37 AM
9

Thanks for the kind offer, and the heartwarming words! Felt like I was just making a huge deal out of my rather mundane childhood traumas and blabbering tangentially, but if that helps anyone in any way, hooray for that. Sadly I live on another continent so it may be a while before I'm in the vincinity. Would love to do a coast to coast road trip some day though, and Vegas would definitely be on that route. Not sure if that'll ever really happen, but in any case you're now tagged as "owes Heinek…
/r/MensRights23/03/12 10:30 AM
19

mom would ALWAYS put down dad in front of us I deeply fear that nowadays there's just an unprecedented amount of men raised by single mothers that went through exactly this (and everything it entails), and never got a chance to feel anything positive about their own or anyone else's masculinity. Without going into all the details, I'm now in my early thirties and still working on recovering from all the anxiety and internal conflicts that my mother inflicted on me in my formative years with all …
/r/MensRights23/03/12 07:29 AM
1

It's not like the same people can't be trying to both control and "protect" women (which conversely makes men both more free and more expendable). That's what patronizing is all about.
/r/MensRights15/03/12 05:47 PM
1

Is the implication here that women aren't at all responsible for the existence of this patriarchy as it stands today? Or that the male privilege isn't quite as all-encompassing or as much a real privilege, even in patriarchy, as it's often made out to be? Or something else?
/r/MensRights06/03/12 01:18 PM
9

I think it's a pretty fair suggestion as she was the first to repeatedly hit and push the man. Can't say I approve of him hitting her back like the guy did (clearly it wasn necessary for self defense), but it seems just a tad double-standard-y how 90% of the comments single out the guy as the asshole that needs to die or go in jail and only have sympathy for the lady (sic). Furthermore, the whole scene seems staged and baited from the beginning with a clear intention of using it as evidence, lik…
/r/MensRights06/03/12 12:57 PM
10

Don't women have the guts to confront men and tell them to move over, please? I don't think women and girls can cope with that. They choose not to take on that battle. What do you think would happen if a woman told a man to move over? Have you or anyone you know tried? It's hard to say how men in general would react. In order for any change to happen I think men need to realize themselves that change is needed. Is it just me or does this just seem like some unbelievably stereotypical, passive-ag…
/r/MensRights06/03/12 09:16 AM
3

Not really google's fault, but at least it shows how marginalized the whole topic is even on the internet.
/r/MensRights05/03/12 05:01 AM
6

\4. abstinence With love, Rush
/r/MensRights04/03/12 09:51 AM
5

Please, let's not go down the No True Feminist path. I know there are some really bigoted ones out there (just as it is with every movement), but there are also the genuinely egalitarian ones that simply don't know where else to belong. The former may be a real obstacle to men's rights, but let's not force antagonism where there doesn't need to be any.
/r/MensRights03/03/12 07:34 PM
1

In reference to this whole chain of comments, I think your original comment was one of the most insightful I've seen in any video game discussion, and on a general level I couldn't really agree more. The one point where I beg to slightly differ, though, is that any individual piece of art or entertainment shouldn't be considered as symptomatic of all art or entertainment. There are always individual pieces or art and/or entertainment products that specifically cater to a very specific audience, …
/r/MensRights27/02/12 06:04 PM
10

And to even hint at women being genetically predisposed to anything that isn't absolutely universally seen as a positive or at least a totally value-neutral trait... uh-oh, not going to end well! Women are inherently just as good as and even better than men in every possible way, no matter what the physical reality says -- active discrimination by the all-permeating Patriarchy is and can ever be the only thing keeping them from achieving the same or better results. Repeat that mantra long enough…
/r/MensRights23/01/12 05:57 AM
1

I'll admit that I'm no expert in the eating habits or hiring politics of any sector, but you're essentially using the fact that female managers appear to favor female applicants as proof that male managers do not favor female applicants for other than business reasons. I don't think this is a logically sound connection to make. For one, there's no reason to assume that female managers have identical motives with male managers regarding their hiring policies. I feel that a male manager would be m…
/r/MensRights23/10/11 04:36 PM
1

I've seen some of them, but can't say I recall anything like that. Even if I did, though, I wouldn't necessarily take it at face value, knowing his general style of writing. But I assume that you're referring to something in particular, and sadly I have no idea what that is. That's a lot of comments to read if you expect me to figure it out by myself. I guess this is where I refer to Valerie Solanas and conclude that the feministic movement as a whole advocates murdering men? Fair conclusion, no…
/r/MensRights23/10/11 02:21 PM
2

"Men are reduced from human beings to human doings." That's just so it. Even the most hateful misandrist would probably admit that there have been some "great men who have done great things", but when it comes to any intrinsic value, men simply have none. As children, yes, but when boys become men it's time for the neverending Do Something or be forever loathed as a worthless piece of good-for-nothing. Where a woman would be helped in her unfortunate situation, a man would at best be helped to g…
/r/MensRights23/10/11 07:20 AM
-4

attractive girls bring in more business [needs citation] As a straight male, the above sentiment seems kinda sorta plausible at first glance, but then I remember that males are actually a minority in practically all of the (western) world. And that I don't even personally take my business to this place or that based on the sex of the employees, even if buying something from a female might feel more pleasant once I'm actually there. If we were talking about a strip bar, then sure, but... It's mor…
/r/MensRights23/10/11 07:16 AM
1

On the average, perhaps, but this has really nothing to do with the actual applicants, who should be evaluated individually, without making assumptions based on just their sex/gender. Broad categories like "men" and "women" are abstractions, and anything that can be said of them only has statistical significance. Men are taller than women, but not every man is taller than every woman. Works both ways, of course.
/r/MensRights23/10/11 06:57 AM
1

Looks like she believes that some people just misread her post as saying that 99% of all men are abusers, and are upset because of that. Which obviously isn't the case. Not to defend her pulling statistics out of her ass and presenting them as the truth, but after all the false statistics we get from certain sources, I don't wonder if a lot of people genuinely have really distorted views of the reality that these statistics are supposed to represent.
/r/MensRights21/10/11 07:48 AM
6

So I looked a bit into what Jenna quoted as just a sampling of reddit comments. Here's what I managed to find: "I want to strangle this c-nt" Could not find. Deleted? Edited? Buried somewhere in the downvoted branches? (Thought I had every single comment visible, but can't be 100% certain.) "These whores! [. . .] I'll say to you, my fellow brothers, we cannot tolerate this sort of thing! This [ . . . ] gyno-dictatorship that we so imminently face! I'm telling you this can only be solved with som…
/r/MensRights21/10/11 07:18 AM
2

~~ Article pulled, but~~ here's the original thread discussing it. ETA: the cached article/blog post
/r/MensRights21/10/11 04:29 AM
24

Yes, women generally conceive children all by themselves. Meanwhile men usually just destroy life by, uh, being all men and stuff!
/r/MensRights20/10/11 07:43 AM
0

Feels rather kafkaesque, to be honest. To borrow and expand on your example, feels more like "Men rape other women because you're such a slut". Or how I imagine that would feel.
/r/MensRights18/10/11 02:13 PM
1

In democracy, everyone is part of a political committee. Tabloids are our memos.
/r/MensRights16/10/11 01:37 PM
2

Sounds great and all, but try to tell that to the woman that sees you cry once and never thinks of you as a man again. Admittedly it may be more of a primitive and instinctual thing than some intellectual or socio-political stance, but it's a privilege all the same.
/r/MensRights14/09/11 03:23 AM
1

In order to overcome anything you need to identify it first, otherwise you're just shooting blindly into darkness. I.e. those things are two consecutive steps rather than something mutually exclusive.
/r/MensRights14/09/11 03:10 AM
1

I'm not an expert on the subject, but isn't chemical castration a reversible medical condition? Not that the user is showing much common sense anyway (to put it nicely -- obviously as misandric as it gets, whether a troll or not), but.. sensationalist headlines are sensationalist.
/r/MensRights11/09/11 04:26 PM
1

I'm not sure where you got the idea that standing up for people is all about killing other people.
/r/MensRights09/07/11 05:13 AM
1

The way you're thinking seems really evil to me. Lucky for you, I don't think alike.
/r/MensRights02/07/11 08:27 AM
6

Not that it makes anything better, but there's a man or two riding that wave too.
/r/MensRights09/06/11 01:15 AM
1

Thus feminists reject the notion that women are capable of any kind of evil or ignorance. Sweet.
/r/MensRights08/06/11 11:33 AM
2

I see you're getting downvoted and I would like some of that shit too. I think she's funnier than most things I've paid to be amused by.
/r/MensRights08/06/11 09:59 AM
6

Feminists are very loudly against female genital mutilation. Drop the "female" and we do actually have a human right concern, but then it's not about gender equality female privilege anymore.
/r/MensRights08/06/11 09:24 AM
5

Pathetic, virgin, forever alone... Basically anything that implies lack of acceptance and respect from women. (To be fair, it's just the opposite of "fat ugly feminazis".)
/r/MensRights05/06/11 05:16 PM
1

Regardless of being right or wrong, being hostile and aggressive about the whole matter tends to always get a negative reaction. Call it 'knee-jerk' if you will. It's not only the logic that can be flawed, but also the manner in which the conclusions are expressed (from a purely social/psychological point of view). It doesn't make the points invalid, but is just common sense to deliver things in a manner that's easy for everyone to accept without feeling they're intimidated into submission. I fo…
/r/MensRights04/06/11 01:37 AM
2

Did you actually read the comment you replied to?
/r/MensRights04/06/11 01:09 AM
2

Breaking: Women of all ages say men should naturally prefer women of their age. More news at eleven..
/r/MensRights02/06/11 04:18 PM
6

Funny how not having (had) a relationship (with a woman) presumably makes one somehow incapable of understanding concepts like equality or human rights. While it's never really stated explicitly, there's a lot of that "lol he's just a frustrated chump coz he's not gettin any!" shaming around whenever a man opens his mouth about any gendered issue. I reckon at its core it's about men having to be validated by women in order for their feelings and thoughts to gain any importance.
/r/MensRights20/05/11 10:32 AM
1

While your comment was generally agreed with, this got a nice little grin out of me: you have time to build trust. Trust me The clinically insane women apart, though, there are the kind of women (and men) who are more just profoundly self-absorbed than insane, and only show the Hyde side when they've convinced themselves that they have nothing more to gain from you that would require your cooperation or assistance. I reckon these are often the same people who after shorter relationships decide t…
/r/MensRights19/05/11 06:50 PM
1

Not in the laws, as far as I know -- at least not explicitly -- but it's a very common interpretation, by both men and women, including the people that are paid to offer protection and ensure justice. Men are often refused from safe houses and ridiculed by authorities when they face violence by women ("Oh c'mon, you getting beaten up by a woman?!") and I'm fairly sure that violence by women is much more often excused as "a desperate act of self defence" or some such thing, even without any basis…
/r/MensRights16/05/11 05:50 AM
-3

A source would be appreciated. Are we talking about single parent households only, or also those where both parents are present? In the latter case, how do we measure "custody" -- assume 50/50 responsibility for and time spent with children, or something else? What is the correct way of adjusting anyway, in cases of shared but uneven custody? I've seen enough lying with statistics to be a bit sceptical by default, whether I personally like the conclusion or not. All the numbers I've seen before …
/r/MensRights14/05/11 04:55 PM
5

Here in our socialist utopia of Finland even Amnesty campaigns against domestic violence by calling it "violence against women". Officially such a thing as a woman that is the aggressor and not the victim doesn't even exist.
/r/MensRights14/05/11 01:16 PM
-3

To be fair, more children in custody of their dads would inevitably even out the numbers, if not reverse them. That said, it's still shocking how the abuser in these kinds of ads is most of the time a man, when in reality it's much more likely a woman. Violent women are still such a taboo that a lot of people must think they don't even exist anywhere outside Tarantino movies (where they're the good guys, of course). Also this quote is just golden: "The child is so innocent looking and we're not …
/r/MensRights14/05/11 01:12 PM
1

Contrary to at least five voters before me, I assume sarcasm. Or.. agree with the exact opposite. ...I mean see the comment as contributing something to the discussion. Yeah, that's it. That's it.
/r/MensRights11/05/11 09:27 AM
4

male is still the ruling gender [Citation needed] Granted the ruling class is still predominantly male, but this doesn't make men as a whole "the ruling gender". It simply means that the small minority at the very top of our social pyramid consists of more males than females. Most men are not there. Most men just aren't "alpha" in any meaningful sense. Most men aren't even asked, most men are told. Socially most men are below the average female: expendable and of no intrinsic value to speak of. …
/r/MensRights09/05/11 04:25 AM
2

It sure is!
/r/MensRights04/05/11 08:29 AM
0

Women taking rape seriously hasn't exactly stopped it. But yeah, basically I agree. At least it's much better than silent acceptance.
/r/MensRights02/05/11 06:29 PM
5

What rights have women gained in the past decade? For that matter, what rights have they been missing in the past decade, or several? Regarding the civil rights comparison, I simply don't see any basis for claiming that women were the "slaves". The more distinct social roles restricted men just as much as they did women. While women were restricted to the role of housewives, men were restricted to the role of breadwinners (how isn't working your ass off in the field or a factory more like slaver…
/r/MensRights30/04/11 10:53 AM
1

Absolutely, not all feminists are as bad as the worst ones. Some (most?) may even be genuinely egalitarian and only choose to call themselves feminists because they honestly believe that feminism, at its core, is truly a gender-egalitarian movement, at least in the spirit if not necessarily in name or practice, and that at least feminism isn't actively harming men in its work to help women. Sadly that kind of blind optimism often leads to unfortunate results. It's not a zero-sum game, but the re…
/r/MensRights30/04/11 09:28 AM
1

For someone who seems to understand how logic works, you're rather quick to abandon all logic when it lets you make haphazard assumptions to confirm your own personal preconceptions. Does anti-capitalism mean that one hates money? Does anti-feminism mean that one hates women? And so on. Granted, most misogynists are likely anti-feminism as well, but anti-feminism does not mean or require misogynism. There's plenty of evidence that feminism, in practice, is not really about equality for everyone,…
/r/MensRights30/04/11 08:24 AM
1

Conscientious objection, in practice, means half a year in prison. Nowadays the other non-military option, civilian service, is only 12 months, IIRC, but still it's just as punitive in nature, and basically just means a year of forced labor.
/r/MensRights30/04/11 07:38 AM
1

I'm from the social-democratic utopia of Finland, allegedly one of the most gender-equal nations in the world, and spent half a year in prison for the crime of penis. I've sometimes used pretty much the exact same phrase that lollllollolololol did, but hear this: that doesn't mean that I really want everyone to be drafted. If you ask me, draft no one. Assuming soldiers are still needed, use volunteers. Maybe even pay them like they're actually doing something valuable for whoever does the comman…
/r/MensRights29/04/11 09:10 AM
1

A tad Scottish, even?
/r/MensRights29/04/11 08:30 AM
2

I'm not a feminist, but I do read /r/feminisms. Maybe I'm a naïve fool, but I'd like to think that the door swings both ways.
/r/MensRights29/04/11 08:27 AM
1

A good read. Thank you.
/r/MensRights29/04/11 08:21 AM
2

This is my main gripe with the feminists that play the "We're not just about equality just for women, we're about equality for everyone!" card. Sure it may sound nicer and less antagonistic and work like that on paper, but in practice all the resources are still directed at projects that directly benefit women and only women, while often subtly or less subtly implying that men are but the source of all gendered problems and other evil in the world, and in any case to be completely ignored as fee…
/r/MensRights29/04/11 04:50 AM
9

Wouldn't it make more sense to just remove the "typically a woman" part from the definition of a prostitute? I don't see the point of this eye for an eye sort of sex/gender bashing.
/r/MensRights11/04/11 05:46 PM
1

I'm sure there's plenty of quotes that apply. What I especially like about that one that there's just no way around it: In Soviet Russia, gaze long into the abyss, and the abyss gazes into you.
/r/MensRights27/03/11 05:45 AM
18

"Gaze long into the abyss, and the abyss gazes into you." Also, don't forget your whip and shit.
/r/MensRights26/03/11 11:14 PM
2

While I, too, am happy to read something like that, at the same time it makes me a little sad to see so many thanking a woman for being genuinely equalitarian, and to realize what it tells about the world we live in.
/r/MensRights24/03/11 08:49 AM
-2

But I did it all for the kids! Don't you know that children are only happy if their mother is happy? Do you really love your money more than you love your own children?! /s
/r/MensRights08/02/11 11:32 AM
1

Sometimes I just love the conceptions people have about prisons. Of course they're not all the same, but I don't think most of them are quite what we see on TV shows.
/r/MensRights30/01/11 05:33 AM
1

Two wrongs just don't make right.
/r/MensRights30/01/11 05:15 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter