TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

IONCEWASBANNED Archive

View 2 posts and 108 comments by IONCEWASBANNED on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
57

Reverse GendersIONCEWASBANNED/r/MensRights23/09/14 06:13 PM
0

IONCEWASBANNED/r/MensRights16/10/14 01:54 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

But you can't concede that a man started it, and it was the man's family that continued it, and that it was a (sexist) religion that supported it.
/r/MensRights16/10/14 01:47 PM
-6

Keep calling me a cunt! I love being right!
/r/MensRights14/10/14 08:21 PM
-21

So over half of acid attack victims are women and most of the acid attack victims shown in the media are women? OK! Would be awesome if the site sourced actual international statistical data instead of mostly other MRA sites.
/r/MensRights14/10/14 08:11 PM
-12

You would still have to forcibly invade a woman's body to transplant a non-sentient, non-viable fetus. Sorry, that willn ever be cool in my book.
/r/MensRights14/10/14 08:10 PM
-8

It's pretty easy for men to relinquish custodial rights/obligations where I live.
/r/MensRights14/10/14 08:08 PM
-47

I hope you tell that you your kid.
/r/MensRights14/10/14 08:08 PM
7

20 something?
/r/MensRights14/10/14 08:07 PM
-9

Abortion is great. How is this controversial?
/r/MensRights14/10/14 08:07 PM
1

Cool!
/r/MensRights14/10/14 08:06 PM
-3

Who threw the acid on her again? And are you really saying that western feminists do not denounce religious extremism that, in particular, harms women?
/r/MensRights14/10/14 08:03 PM
-6

Yes. Rightly calling a post out for bullshit = trolling. Typical typical.
/r/MensRights14/10/14 08:03 PM
-8

Keep it classy /MensRights! No women hatred here, nope.
/r/MensRights14/10/14 04:44 PM
-1

You know what really grinds my gears? WTF? Are you 90?
/r/MensRights14/10/14 03:34 PM
5

The only logical post so far.
/r/MensRights14/10/14 03:33 PM
4

By everyone's logic here, it's no big deal to circumcise infant boys in the west because men and boys face so much worse in other parts of the world. Do you have zero self-awareness? I'm embarrassed for the lot of you.
/r/MensRights14/10/14 03:32 PM
-13

Do you have any idea what a douche you sound like?
/r/MensRights14/10/14 03:31 PM
-3

I am pretty sure feminists regularly fight for the abused, and getting them the help and support they need so they do not have to move back in with their abusers. Don't let reality get in the way of hating feminists though!
/r/MensRights14/10/14 03:31 PM
8

I disagree very strongly w/ the sex/biological essentialism that you drop. I do not think a vagina makes one a good parent or that a penis makes one good at fixing cars. However, as far as "roles" go, I feel like whatever works for you (and your wife) is your business.
/r/MensRights11/10/14 08:01 AM
1

I meant that my understanding of the new law does not require that consent be verbalized.
/r/MensRights30/09/14 04:11 PM
2

I've always had my boundaries respected with women. It's my understanding that consent does not have to necessarily be verbalized.
/r/MensRights29/09/14 05:18 PM
2

Propensity for violence is not biological, or at least not very.
/r/MensRights26/09/14 02:11 PM
-1

And black people, too.
/r/MensRights26/09/14 02:10 PM
3

What is the source for the 2nd quote? Seems kind of tabloidish, IMO.
/r/MensRights26/09/14 02:09 PM
0

I understand. But you're making an apples and molehills comparison.
/r/MensRights23/09/14 09:07 PM
1

They can both be wrong without being the same. (At least that's the point I'm getting from skimming the Coates article.)
/r/MensRights23/09/14 08:53 PM
0

a man is presumed guilty and punished without trial Well. Except in an actual lynching, the person presumed guilty is punished by execution.
/r/MensRights23/09/14 08:52 PM
0

Cops are charging her; they are not charging him, although they did arrest the woman who attacked him. Yes, she may not be found guilty, but he hasn't even been charged. Well he doesn't mention legal action (or lack of) against rice, so I gather he doesn't use "alleged" 1) because of this and 2) because of the video evidence, where his actions are unequivocal.
/r/MensRights23/09/14 08:00 PM
2

Great analysis.
/r/MensRights23/09/14 07:12 PM
1

Hole Solo?
/r/MensRights23/09/14 07:12 PM
0

shitthatdidinthappen.txt
/r/MensRights23/09/14 02:22 PM
0

Actual title of link: US Soccer Stands By Decision to Let Hope Solo Play Pending Assault Charge alt USSF reaffirms due process for Solo Regardless of how you feel about the content or decision of the article, it's a disservice to editorialize the title.
/r/MensRights23/09/14 02:21 PM
1

I'm curious as to what department this is, and what the titles/roles of the people in the picture are. If it's an administrative/secretarial pool or social work or something of that nature, I would not be surprised if it's comprised mostly of women.
/r/MensRights23/09/14 02:19 PM
1

You said she hurt/injured him. She didn't.
/r/MensRights23/09/14 02:15 PM
1

It's going to be difficult to find an atty. probono. You may be able to find one, or at sliding scale, but truthfully, if your income documentation shows you should be able to afford an attorney, you might bet SOL. Also working against you is not having anything formalized. (I am guessing this includes paternity?) I understand it feels as though this is a huge conspiracy against you, but try to understand the court's and case workers perspectives - they really cannot just take someone at their w…
/r/MensRights23/09/14 02:33 AM
1

http://stevendiebold.com/successful-people-who-had-early-setbacks/ http://www.budbilanich.com/50-famous-people-who-failed-at-their-first-attempt-at-career-success/ (repeats) https://uk.lifestyle.yahoo.com/six-celebrities-who-turned-childhood-setbacks-into-sucess.html Seriously. Just shut up. I don't know why its up to you or anyone to tell someone else their experiences, and how they affected their lives, are actually inconsequential. People post on this sub all the time as to why they came arou…
/r/MensRights23/09/14 02:25 AM
0

Or, you know, HE WAS NOT FUCKING INJURED. In your universe, even video documentation cannot exist as proof that a person (in this case, a man) used excessive force.
/r/MensRights23/09/14 02:20 AM
1

So you think trans people are inhuman? Wow, buddy.
/r/MensRights23/09/14 02:19 AM
-1

shitthatdidnthappen.txt
/r/MensRights22/09/14 09:45 PM
2

Jesus.
/r/MensRights22/09/14 09:44 PM
2

Can't be both?
/r/MensRights22/09/14 09:44 PM
1

What sort of help are you looking for? Were you married to their mother? Was there a formal custody/support plan in place while she had the girls?
/r/MensRights22/09/14 09:43 PM
13

My father was ill for most of my parents marriage. He was the one who was ill. But it affected all of us. It's two separate things, different types of suffering, it does not have to be a competition.
/r/MensRights22/09/14 09:42 PM
1

Settel down, bevis. There is such a think as people succeeding despite their setbacks, and that applies to men to.
/r/MensRights22/09/14 09:40 PM
1

I'm sorry, I really didn't mean for that to be directed at you in particular, this is the first AMA I've read here in a while and it just came to mind. Certainly your privacy is more important than any sort of verification.
/r/MensRights22/09/14 09:38 PM
1

I stand by what I say and also contend that it is a more viable way too end the death penalty than to "require" women be executed. To my knowledge, there are no states that "require" anyone to be executed, and to put a formal gender-based requirement would (rightly) spark outrage. The court system and its related date are easily able to be quantified, but you can't reverse engineer it, as there are so many human variables at play.
/r/MensRights21/09/14 12:25 AM
0

I propose that he was not injured. I propose that she was injured. Actually, i don't propose those at all. Those are uncontestable facts.
/r/MensRights21/09/14 12:21 AM
1

Also not trying to be an ass here, but is there any sort of mod verification possible for AMAs? I think the regular AMA sub has it. It might be helpful b/c people could say they are speaking from a certain experience but, it being the anonymous internet, be embellishing or misrepresenting or whatever. (Not saying this is the case here, whatsoever, but it happens.)
/r/MensRights21/09/14 12:20 AM
1

Have you considered that the wage discrimination you now face could be b/c you are trans? What was the store chain that paid you more as a woman than they did as a man? Do you feel as though you get shit on for needing to man up from more men, women, or about equal? I take issue w/ a couple things you say at the end. I am apparently not even allowed to voice my opinion on women's rights. This is ridiculous, as you are actually doing that exact thing right now and no one is stopping you. Doesn't …
/r/MensRights21/09/14 12:17 AM
0

Things you can do prepeatedly taht are not beating: stroke a dick, check an alarm clock, pull-ups, pet a kitten. You the repeteition makes the beating, being willfully ignorant of the whole hurt or injure part.
/r/MensRights19/09/14 08:58 PM
0

Did you read the "hurt or injure" part, dipshit?
/r/MensRights19/09/14 08:57 PM
0

Right here in your original comment: So, because she is personally not quite as excited about this birthcontrol, which does not yet actually exist in any meaningful way, and because neither am I, I am tehrefore saying the demand for it does not exist? Really, brother? A complete misrepresentation of my point. You're denying your own words and misrepresenting mine, so this conversation is over. A totally accurate representation of your hissy fit about how the author is so mean and man-hatey, when…
/r/MensRights19/09/14 08:56 PM
1

Yeah. 5 downvotes for saying he wasn't been, so far...pathetic .
/r/MensRights19/09/14 08:52 PM
1

Equally quick, and without anyone being murdered by the state: criminalize state-sanctioned murder.
/r/MensRights19/09/14 08:52 PM
1

Everything I've read said it's about equal, with men more likely to land actual blows.
/r/MensRights18/09/14 09:45 PM
-1

why i will never be a libertarian
/r/MensRights18/09/14 09:44 PM
-2

Your logic is weak. That's like saying "it's only murder if you shoot them a bunch of times."
/r/MensRights18/09/14 09:44 PM
-6

Ray Rice was not being beaten.
/r/MensRights18/09/14 09:43 PM
-4

Wow. Pulling from Breitbart? That's [pretty pathetic dude.
/r/MensRights18/09/14 09:43 PM
11

I am in the USA and I blanket oppose the death penalty.
/r/MensRights18/09/14 09:42 PM
4

So now who are these male gaming journalists that are corrupt, again? I need to know so I will never read them.
/r/MensRights18/09/14 09:39 PM
1

People already get vasectomies; they go under the knife to become (pretty much) irreversibly sterile, yet you think because you personally wouldn't like this injection that no one will want it? You're just making shit up now, huh? There will be demand. Let me say it again because you didn't get it the first few times: there will be demand. And can you tell me where I said anything to the contrary? Remember, you are the one who submitted this post and then had to whine about what a big meanie the…
/r/MensRights18/09/14 09:38 PM
1

i am even more interested in an actual assertion that uses evidence and example to back up it's claim. You mean like those things she provides never?
/r/MensRights18/09/14 09:26 PM
3

Don't generalise based on your own personal preferences, when all you have to do is scroll down to see some other people's views. Demand is sky-high. So, don't generalized based on my own personal experiences, but read a very particular subreddit on the internet, whose points-of-views represent far less than 50% of the population, and take its word for it? Like a pill that gives them high blood pressure or an IUD that gives them nasty period pains? Did you totally miss the point where I said "wo…
/r/MensRights18/09/14 12:52 AM
1

I believe her shit she writes is as biased as shit written by Jessca Valenti or whomever, yes. Her conclusions come from her pre-existing notions, not from evidence.
/r/MensRights18/09/14 12:37 AM
1

I asked this on a feminist subreddit last night, and so far there has been no answer. Link?
/r/MensRights18/09/14 12:37 AM
1

I would consult an attorney and if you have access to one, a counselor or therapist. This happened to my brother mere weeks before he was to be married and as you can imagine, shook him to the core. Sadly he has not really stepped up to the plate in the years since, and is a "father" only on paper and because child support is deducted.
/r/MensRights18/09/14 12:37 AM
2

Actually, no, you are completely wrong about what bias means. It simply means prejudicial notion for or against something, and CHS is biased.
/r/MensRights18/09/14 12:25 AM
3

Actually, she says she's not holding her breath for it because men will have to have it injected into their nutsack, and I can't say I blame her. I think I'd rather us a condom or, in the case of a relationship, let them choose what method works best for them.
/r/MensRights18/09/14 12:21 AM
11

It's somewhat laughable to call Christina Hoff Summers "unbiased." Her bias is quite well known, and she doesn't hide it.
/r/MensRights17/09/14 01:18 AM
1

Nope. Just providing information not in keeping w/ the party line. Maybe I will dig it back up one of these days. Edit to add: This was, I believe, not long after the great shitshow where the mods all changed their handles.
/r/MensRights12/09/14 12:49 AM
1

And who in this sub is defending male murderers? It has happened before, and I when I took the time to pull out example after example, I was banned.
/r/MensRights10/09/14 06:14 PM
2

So one is not punched in the face with a powerful enough force to knock one down/out unless one's skull is actually fractured? That is the severity it takes for you to believe that a person used excessive force?
/r/MensRights09/09/14 10:10 PM
2

I wouldn't be so eager to paint women as the terrible ones in this. Men do it too, with about the same frequency, and this sub (sadly) defends it to an extent, insinuating that good, innocent men are pushed to such extremes by an unfair system. http://kstp.com/article/stories/s3404355.shtml http://www.ocregister.com/articles/wallace-594627-wife-prosecutors.html http://www.startribune.com/local/247323321.html http://www.news.com.au/national/nsw-act/father-of-slain-melbourne-girls-savannah-and-ind…
/r/MensRights09/09/14 09:05 PM
1

This is like something loosely happening to a very close friend of mine. This woman he formerly worked with/slept with began harassing him and it has been escalating. He is keeping records of all of it. He has held off on pressing charges so far b/c he doesn't want her to lose her kid, sending her off the deep end. If she threatens to hurt herself, call the police. They should be able to put her on a 72 hour hold at a mental care facility, where she will either start to get the help she needs or…
/r/MensRights09/09/14 08:54 PM
1

Oh, so not only are you an expert on the criminal justice system, you are also a doctor? I'm just curious, though, what sort of evidence of a guy punching someone would be sufficient for you to say, "yes, he sure did punch that person alright." Because video evidence apparently isn't enough. Do you think you'd need to be an eye witness?
/r/MensRights09/09/14 08:41 PM
1

It does not matter that she hit him first. We hold cops accountable for excessive force, so why not the same for private citizens? When you knock someone out on purpose, you are not attempting to restrain them or protect yourself. You do it to prove a point - that you are bigger, stronger, more powerful than the other person.
/r/MensRights09/09/14 03:35 PM
1

Drove while intoxicated (a crime) but I did not mean to kill that person (also a crime). I meant to use excessive force to "defend" myself (a crime) but I did not mean for that person to suffer further injury as a result of my fist (also a crime). I think your stupid claim that she knocked out from the rail is dubious.
/r/MensRights09/09/14 03:24 PM
2

Hitting her in the face was intentional, and injuries she suffered as a result were his fault. This should not be controversial. Drunk drivers don't get to hit other vehicles or pedestrians and say "I didn't mean to, your honor."
/r/MensRights09/09/14 03:31 AM
5

So she's a gold-digger and he has no culpability in knocking her unconcscious? OK, player.
/r/MensRights08/09/14 06:39 PM
1

It would be unfair to women, considering women have no guaranteed maternity time in the USA. But don't let being intellectually honest get in the way of hating on feminists!
/r/MensRights29/08/14 02:49 PM
0

That does not exactly seem credible.
/r/MensRights29/08/14 02:37 PM
1

I'm confused - you think it's good and right that a person's aggreived ex starts a whole website dedicated to them? I think that's weird. If a woman did that to a man, we'd have no problem identifying that as crazy and obsessive.
/r/MensRights28/08/14 07:45 PM
1

Kevin Ibbs, per the image linked, was "nearing ejaculation." IN the case in question, he kept fucking the person for 30 seconds after she told him to stop. He was not in the throes of an orgasm, and even if he had been HE SHOULD HAVE STOPPED FUCKING HER IF SHE TOLD HIM TO STOP FUCKING HER. Considering the many fucked up things about the case, it's pretty disgusting that the one thing you (and the OP) is harping on is that you think it's okay to keep fucking someone you've been consentually fucki…
/r/MensRights22/08/14 02:57 PM
1

Food is not part of a person's body. It is not an act. You cannot actually, literally, GIVE someone your body. You can never relinquish ownership of it, even in a BDSM situation. Honestly, it's a little annoying to compare sex to an act that begins with ingesting something and ends as waste. I think you spend a lot of words trying to carve out a too-large space that would somehow making continuing to have sex with someone who is no longer consenting okay. Numerous times I've been asked to stop, …
/r/MensRights21/08/14 02:01 PM
0

Agreed. I think the first one is pretty fucked up, too. Whether or not someone is about to cum and whether or not someone's withdrawal of consent is "sudden" (though - couldn't all withdrawals of consent be construed as "sudden"?) is totally irrelevant. Men and women should be able to stop having sex whenever they want to, and if their formerly consentual partner continues to do so afterward, it is rape, full stop. (Disclosure: I do not know the full facts of the case and am only going by the im…
/r/MensRights21/08/14 02:47 AM
1

You really think he wasn't depressed or doing drugs before his late 30s? That's highly untrue.
/r/MensRights17/08/14 11:59 PM
13

I was not a big fan of Williams, but it is always sad when someone succumbs to suicide. I think it's a bit foolish, however, for this subreddit to attribute his death to his exes, rather than decades of depression and drug use.
/r/MensRights12/08/14 05:56 PM
1

That is a perfectly valid thing to get mad about. Not really.
/r/MensRights11/08/14 08:57 PM
-9

So you're mad b/c people can do what they want with their money?
/r/MensRights25/07/14 06:26 PM
12

Wow that's just like To Kill a Mocking bid.
/r/MensRights25/07/14 06:16 PM
8

Oh, how cute. A racist dipshit!
/r/MensRights25/07/14 06:05 PM
1

I wouldn't say I am "glad" he was found innocent, but as I understand it, the case was so mismanaged by law enforcement, he should have been found innocent. However, because he was not found guilty of the crime of murder does not mean he's not a murderer.
/r/MensRights24/07/14 03:03 AM
1

If you really don't see the difference in criminal guilt and public opinion, you need to GTFO.
/r/MensRights24/07/14 02:53 AM
0

That was a typographical error - it should've read, "aren't."
/r/MensRights21/07/14 03:27 PM
1

Colleges have their own systems in place. I'm not quite sure why you're discussing contract law.
/r/MensRights21/07/14 02:29 PM
-26

So OJ isn't a murderer either, huh?
/r/MensRights21/07/14 02:19 PM
1

A clear and convincing standard. The right to an attorney. The right to confront and cross examine the accuser. Some minimal right to discovery of all pertinent information. So basically, you want a criminal proceeding, even though colleges are arms of the government?
/r/MensRights15/07/14 05:44 PM
4

I've been following that tumblr and haven't gone all the way back, but it's been 100% young white women holding signs so far.
/r/MensRights14/07/14 06:06 PM
1

I guess I'm not quite sure what you're wanting here - college tribunals that bear the same weight as criminal proceedings, as well as have the same burden of proof?
/r/MensRights14/07/14 05:56 PM
1

What do you call a non-criminal proceeding at a private school, then?
/r/MensRights11/07/14 11:48 AM
-1

Dartmouth is a private college. You are comparing a civil action at a private institution to a criminal action by the federal government.
/r/MensRights08/07/14 11:53 AM
1

I'm a bit confused. Did you consensually (even if reluctantly) continue having sex w/ her when the condom came off? Definitely lawyer up and get a paternity test. The right thing to do when you have a kid, even if you aren't on board with the woman's decision, is to be a good parent. The fact that she sounds sketchy or makes an okay salary doesn't change that. (Also, IIRC Plan Be can be a few hundred bucks, and someone's yearly income doesn't mean that such an unexpected expense would be easy to…
/r/MensRights06/07/14 06:10 PM
-27

This seems totally unbelievable to me. So does this whole story, which includes quite a large lack of details.
/r/MensRights04/07/14 07:03 PM
-5

Male vasectomies already have coverage. Male condoms are available OTC and are not covered by anyone's insurance. Can you please source your claim regarding female condoms?
/r/MensRights04/07/14 06:50 PM
1

LOL, never seen one of those. You'd think that'd make them more valueable though. Because bears.
/r/MensRights04/07/14 12:09 PM
0

Pigman has been banned numerous times, as you can probably tell.
/r/MensRights04/07/14 02:13 AM
1

That's true, but not "just." It was not "just" those users who got banned.
/r/MensRights04/07/14 02:03 AM
2

Hi. I was a contributor here for years and was eventually banned for being a "troll," which, at that time, meant "not toeing the extremist MRA line." I only pop in here every now and again to read, but felt compelled to comment on this one. I haven't been around or participated lately enough to speak for the current situation, but at the time, mods Celda (?) and IgnatiousLoyola (one of whom is now nicemod) were seemingly experiencing a lot of pressure to "crack down" on users who could be percei…
/r/MensRights04/07/14 01:31 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter