TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

IPGDVFT Archive

View 6 posts and 129 comments by IPGDVFT on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

The next time she does this tell her that her comments aren't welcomed and the topic of conversation isn't appropriate in the workplace. Then inform your boss that you had this discussion with her and ask what she would like you to do if this pattern of harassment continues. Make sure you document your boss's response. This way it seems like you are not complaining about a coworker but are instead asking for advice. It also makes your boss aware of the situation and forces them to take an active…
/r/MensRights27/04/15 03:18 PM
2

I misread your original comment. I took the "How do they get away with it over and over" as a sigh not another one of these things instead of you quoting the .gif. Sorry about that. The type of message in this article is on the right path to counter the misconception of sexual aggression being a part of masculinity. Just change the ending to "How does this 4% get away with 90% of all rapes? Even if you were the first, you most likely won't be his last. Report your rapist."
/r/MensRights22/03/14 06:40 PM
2

This was posted about 12 hours ago, so I'll copy and paste what I wrote there here. Based on their sample size (n=1882) and that they got 120 people to answer yes to at least 1 of the 4 questions that gives us a little over 6% of the population being rapists. There were 76 multiple time offenders (a little over 4%) accounting for 90% of the incidents. This approximately falls inline with what /u/girlwriteswhat often quotes, so I don't find it surprising. I actually like the piece, because it act…
/r/MensRights22/03/14 05:56 PM
1

The video is a parody.
/r/MensRights22/03/14 05:44 AM
4

Based on their sample size (n=1882) and that they got 120 people to answer yes to at least 1 of the 4 questions that gives us a little over 6% of the population being rapists. There were 76 multiple time offenders (a little over 4%) accounting for 90% of the incidents. This approximately falls inline with what /u/girlwriteswhat often quotes, so I don't find it surprising. I actually like the piece, because it actually shows how few men are actually the perpetrators of rape. I think that instead …
/r/MensRights22/03/14 05:34 AM
1

I would say that instead of banning "look what this/that horrible woman did posts we should ask that posters specify what part of the news article they find not only relevant, but how it expands the current discussion. For example, a few days back someone posted an article about a Vice photographer who was actively objectifying men's bodies in response to the objectification of women in advertising. Posting this and then actually asking questions like "how does this help solve the issue of objec…
/r/MensRights22/03/14 04:21 AM
17

I honestly feel that people who are outraged by this quote are just looking for something to be outraged by. People tend to settle on this quote, because it's so easy to criticize. Many of us have heard the phrase "no means no" since we were children so when we here it contradicted it just sounds wrong and dirty. However, Warren Farrell does an excellent job of breaking down how "no" doesn't always mean no. There are many different factors such as intonation of voice, body language, etc. which c…
/r/MensRights22/03/14 03:14 AM
2

Suddenly replying to your own written assertions is tangential. Right... Perhaps next time state only what you wish to be addressed sans asides, otherwise everything you state is fair game in debate. Why are you viewing this as a debate? I started out simply trying to critique your idea and point out any large issues that would need to be addressed. Instead of responding to my critiques you went to a tangential topic. As I said above: If you only want to continue talking about tangentially relat…
/r/MensRights15/03/14 06:37 PM
2

Women have more options because biologically women have more consequences things happening to their body? Seems logical. Again, this has nothing to do with your original proposal which has a lot of issues that I have brought up that you have addressed. I'm not going to respond to anymore comments outside of the realm of that except to address your second part. Not sure why you chuckled? Men who have custody of their children receive child support from the other parent. Or perhaps you don't know …
/r/MensRights15/03/14 04:47 PM
3

Thank you for taking the time to reply. Again, I will touch on the flippancy issue before addressing the main issue. Abortion on Reddit is commonly discussed as if it were "birth control" and yes this flippancy is more commonly observed from men, which is understandable as pregnancy is not something they have to internalize on a direct level. I would argue that men treat a lot of issues with flippancy more so than women. It comes down to the different ways we communicate. However, when it become…
/r/MensRights15/03/14 04:21 PM
37

To me the most telling parts were: "She started the series in response to the constant objectification of female bodies in mainstream media." and then "I wanted it to mimic the cK body ads from the 90s, rippling muscles, bulges in underwear." She unintentionally admits right there that male bodies are objectified and feels that increasing the amount of objectification would somehow change how advertisers treat women.
/r/MensRights15/03/14 03:06 PM
10

too many men don't consider the consequences of sex or view them flippantly? Abortion is NOT birth control. Before I address the main idea, there are many people that don't consider the consequences of sex. Don't just blame men on this. Also, by definition abortion is a measure of birth control. It is controlling whether or not you give birth to a child. Now, is it a preferred method of birth control? No, and I doubt that there are many men that would see it that way either. There are huge emoti…
/r/MensRights15/03/14 02:56 PM
7

I interacted with them a few times (I was in some student leadership positions), and they were genuinely nice, caring people that cared about guys just as much as women. Did I agree with all of the things that they did or believed in? No, but they actually would hold a positive conversation with you about whatever topic you brought up. However, almost no guys ever went because of the name "Women's Center." I agree with /u/alphawookie, they should just be renamed the "Health and Safety Center" an…
/r/MensRights13/03/14 02:05 AM
5

And then in marketing 1102 you learn that not changing the name might be better haha. Yes, changing the name might attract more students to use it, but modern universities are expected to have Women's Centers. If they feel that it would lead to less students applying to the university then they wouldn't change it.
/r/MensRights12/03/14 11:45 PM
23

At the orientation for the college that I attended the Women's Center came in and talked to everyone. Their message was "The Women's Center: Not Just for Women". They probably spent a quarter of the time just trying to convince the men that they are more than welcome at the center whenever they need something or have questions.
/r/MensRights12/03/14 09:45 PM
3

Alright, let's actually look at the graph critically and try to understand what is going on. For reference, here is the webpage that was used for the post. The graph posted was subscriber growth. This means how many people have clicked subscribe to the subreddit across time. Even for the most popular subreddits in existance one can expect some form of asymptotic behavior, since there is a finite number of people who browse reddit. We should expect periods of large growth, and then the growth slo…
/r/MensRights20/02/14 02:39 PM
4

I never stated that it was about the purse, and of course nobody should have to walk down the street in fear of their own personal safety. The problem is this isn't a perfect world. Their are dangers out their that we can't predict, and people who will do bad things no matter what we do to deter them. However, to expect people to automatically intercede for women just because of their gender is incredibly selfish. What would you do if you saw someone pulling a gun on another person? Would you in…
/r/MensRights20/02/14 02:05 AM
137

And Thursday, a man was shot chasing men who snatched his girlfriend's purse. Answers why people aren't stepping in just a few paragraphs later.
/r/MensRights19/02/14 05:35 PM
2

The government asked the opposition to provide names of other civilians who may wish to leave the siege imposed by its forces, mediator Lakhdar Brahimi said at the news conference in Geneva. "They are asking for the names of civilians to make sure they are not armed people," he said. I might be confused, but it sounds like they are also allowing men to leave and they created a blanket statement for women and children to be permitted to leave.
/r/MensRights07/02/14 08:43 AM
31

If you actually want to do something about it instead of just posting it here: From the Student Code of Non-Academic Conduct Theft, Damage and Destruction of property - Students shall not steal, damage or destroy property of the University or a faculty, staff or other Student. If this was an approved advertisement posted on a public board this could be construed as destruction or theft of university property. However, I don't think it's worth the fuss in this case. On the other hand, and I hope …
/r/MensRights05/02/14 07:08 AM
1

Simplistic isn't bad, but you do have to ask what is being tested. This is a case where they are incorrectly using an experimental design from another discipline and claiming that it is illustrating something that it most likely isn't. Original design: Here are 10 one dollar bills. You decide how to divide this up between you and an anonymous partner. There are many extensions from this game, but you have to have your base model. (Examples of extension: How would average behavior if given certai…
/r/MensRights28/08/13 05:24 PM
6

And here is a study showing no difference between genders. I could go with the usual arguments of these experiments are being run with college students, but I'm gonna go with a different approach. The experiment was being run through social psychology who are allowed to lie to their subjects during an experiment, so subjects may be searching for the twist which can affect behavior. OR The dictator game was not specified as being a double blind study. It's been found that subjects often change th…
/r/MensRights27/08/13 06:18 PM
28

Actually the death penalty used to be an option in rape cases prior to Coker v. Georgia, 433 U.S. 584 where it was ruled that the death penalty for the rape of an adult was grossly disproportionate. Prior to 2008, when the supreme court ruled that the death penalty was disproportionate for any case not involving a death, the death penalty could still be applied for the rape of a child.
/r/MensRights17/07/13 09:20 AM
4

The irony of complaints about high heels.
/r/MensRights31/05/13 05:24 AM
4

I know this isn't going to do you any good, but in case someone else ever finds themselves in a situation where a female won't leave your car (especially in a situation where you just broke up with her) call the police. She used your property and your inability to leave as a bargaining chip to obtain what she wanted (continued argument in this case). This is a perfect illustration of psychological abuse, and you would not be in the wrong to obtain outside help to get out of the situation.
/r/MensRights29/05/13 07:17 AM
10

If you don't mind the questions, was there any presence from the faculty and staff of the gender studies department? If so did any of them ask questions during the Q & A? I am just wondering about the departmental reaction to the talk.
/r/MensRights08/03/13 06:06 AM
2

This is the same Dr. Drew that does the radio show. He had Bristol Palin on his tv show, and kept trying to convince her that she was raped, because she drank wine and then slept with her boyfriend. After telling responding that she wasn't raped he then quotes the law in California to make her technically a victim. It really left a bad taste in my mouth and made it harder for me to enjoy Loveline.
/r/MensRights28/02/13 06:41 AM
0

He can also be a bit of a tool.
/r/MensRights28/02/13 05:58 AM
3

There are a few males at this website.
/r/MensRights13/02/13 10:53 PM
8

The event was obviously made to mock something. Do you know what event they were making fun of?
/r/MensRights13/02/13 10:16 AM
7

Planned Parenthood offers services for men. Some of the services include checkups for reproductive or sexual health problems colon, prostate, and testicular cancer screenings condoms and vasectomy erectile dysfunction and premature ejaculation services, including education, exams, treatment, and referral general health care and routine physical exams jock itch exam and treatment male infertility screening and referral STD testing and treatment urinary tract infections testing and treatment
/r/MensRights12/02/13 11:09 PM
3

Link?
/r/MensRights06/02/13 05:27 AM
2

The article is from 2009. Is there anything more recent on the attempts to apply title IX to STEM?
/r/MensRights28/12/12 06:43 AM
5

Well, we can always try the gender studies strategy of redefining negative words, so they can't be applied to men.
/r/MensRights22/12/12 12:01 AM
3

Correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't Movember follow no-shave-november?
/r/MensRights06/11/12 09:06 AM
7

Account created today...potentially inflammatory post..."boxobuttholes"...this guy checks out. No chance of someone trying to troll.
/r/MensRights29/10/12 02:17 AM
7

You've never seen the world from a female perspective, so let me comment as an expert on your male perspective.
/r/MensRights29/10/12 01:37 AM
2

Yeah, it was sarcasm.
/r/MensRights12/10/12 07:54 AM
3

protected from this girl's bullying This is where you're misguided. Bullying is a combination of action plus power. While the girl has taken actions which could be seen as bullying, according to gender studies literature, women lack the power necessary in society to truly be classified as bullies.
/r/MensRights12/10/12 05:03 AM
1

Here you go: Yesterday, Tracy questioned the veracity of the story of Leo Traynor, a man who wrote about tracking down and meeting his online anti-semitic harasser. The response has been sharply divided between people who don’t even think that Traynor exists and those who say they know him well and have had conversations with him. There are also those who feel that it is morally wrong to ask for evidence from someone who has been harassed, like this Tweeter: Why are you questioning someone’s tra…
/r/MensRights04/10/12 08:14 AM
2

roseart Someone clearly had a bad childhood.
/r/MensRights03/10/12 09:34 AM
15

Did using Crayola's for abortion become a thing? I don't get it...
/r/MensRights02/10/12 07:37 PM
9

So you post a quote from Joseph Goebbels and strip the name off of it hoping for what? Someone agrees and then we get the "OMG MRA's agreed with a Nazi!!!" In the comments you are obviously trying to antagonize people who disagree with the quote. The only purpose of this is to start drama.
/r/MensRights02/10/12 08:19 AM
8

To be fair, women shouldn't ever take advice from cosmo, or they'll accidentally mutilate their partners genitals. Source: I once read the cosmo sex tips.
/r/MensRights02/10/12 04:21 AM
0

Well, if you are debating someone that is set in their beliefs and won't change, then it's essentially just verbal masturbation at that point. However, if there is an outside viewer the one that starts screaming bigot comes off bad and inclines the outside viewer to listen to your point.
/r/MensRights01/10/12 09:48 PM
0

But are you trying to change the mind of the person calling you a bigot or the third party that doesn't have a preference yet?
/r/MensRights01/10/12 09:01 PM
15

It doesn't have as much to do with the length of the clothing, but what the clothing says about you. Someone that comes in clothing that is perceived as fancy or more expensive is going to be welcomed into the club, because this person has shown that they're willing to spend more money for a night out. (Then there's the image of the club and crap like that)
/r/MensRights01/10/12 05:49 PM
1

Sorry guy, Amiroz beat you to it by 18 minutes.
/r/MensRights01/10/12 05:44 PM
1

While this is true, we do something similar in this subreddit. Often the rhetoric used within this subreddit likes to paint the picture as black and white, when it's really many different shades of gray (obligatory 50 shades of gray joke). I feel the best approach is to acknowledge the bias against the other group, while continuing to strive for your personal goal.
/r/MensRights01/10/12 05:43 PM
67

You shouldn't have tried re-framing the subject to fathers rights. It makes it sound like a rant instead of just sticking with they have the right to pursue a political career.
/r/MensRights01/10/12 04:44 PM
1

The name sounds familiar. That may be him.
/r/MensRights30/09/12 08:26 AM
7

Not only are police lineups fallible, it can cause the victim to assign the new face to the perpetrator. There are 2 people that are now work with the innocence project of Texas that this happened to. The female who was raped identified the wrong man as her rapist. At the trial, when asked to identify the man who raped her, she pointed to the same man she identified the same man she had originally indicated had raped her. After he was exonerated and the found the real perpetrator through DNA tes…
/r/MensRights30/09/12 07:27 AM
-1

I'm going to throw this out there and feel free to reply. I'm gonna play Devil's Advocate for a second by spinning the discussion from focusing on how psychology is applied to men and look at how we classify women. In diagnosis of mental health diseases such as depression and bi-polarism we see that women are diagnosed more often than men. What happens is that psychologists have the discussion as to what is considered normal, and then base any diagnoses based on this definition. The definition o…
/r/MensRights30/09/12 05:28 AM
1

It's a topic more in line to be posted on /r/MensRightsMeta, but when we allowed posts linking to the sub then over half of the material and most of the front page was SRS. By banning links there we allowed our subreddit to actually maintain focus on the real issues.
/r/MensRights30/09/12 12:06 AM
2

From the sidebar No linking to SRS or affiliated subs.
/r/MensRights29/09/12 11:48 PM
3

See if the school has any services he can use to help him out. Use them. This. Many universities have some form of legal services available to students.
/r/MensRights29/09/12 11:34 PM
3

When they remove someone's account is it permanently deleted, or can someone create a new account with the same name?
/r/MensRights29/09/12 07:15 PM
3

Look up Bethel School District No. 403 v. Fraser (1986) and Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier (1988).
/r/MensRights29/09/12 07:13 PM
41

What articles is the text referencing?
/r/MensRights29/09/12 09:17 AM
3

From the sidebar: No linking to SRS or affiliated subs.
/r/MensRights28/09/12 09:10 PM
4

I think they did the crotch scratching area fairly accurately.
/r/MensRights25/09/12 06:22 PM
1

Did they include number/value of grants obtained and publications? I didn't read through it fully.
/r/MensRights25/09/12 03:36 AM
6

Do: Beg if necessary Didn't some group recently try to classify sex obtained through begging as rape? This graphic supports rape!!! Seriously though, people will always make these types of info graphics. They're not worth getting up in arms about.
/r/MensRights25/09/12 02:33 AM
6

Right? I thought we got rid of administrative and teacher paddlings.
/r/MensRights24/09/12 08:14 PM
3

The top 6 threads in meta are currently about the situation. All of these threads have been created in the past 15 hours. The continual re-posting of the same thing only divides the discussion across multiple threads instead of having one concrete conversation.
/r/MensRights24/09/12 07:45 PM
2

My roommate TAs psychology courses, and he often uses this video as a humorous example of social norms. What does this have to do with this subreddit?
/r/MensRights21/09/12 02:38 AM
2

In my opinion, the best thing you can theoretically do is be aware of the potential dangers but don't let them rule you and your child's life. When you make a decision ask yourself what are the risks involved, what's the odds of them happening, and what are the potential benefits. The media is a business in our society, and fear mongering is an easy way to obtain revenue.
/r/MensRights16/09/12 11:41 PM
5

Article text: It hasn't just been a summer for political conventions, the Olympics, and a slough of politicians and comedians saying stupid things about rape. Summer 2012 is also the season in which the idea of "mansplaining" may have moved beyond the feminist blogosphere. The concept has entered the broader culture, appearing in the pages of the Nation — and inspiring apoplectic indignation in the comments section at the Good Men Project. Though no one's sure who coined the term, the consensus …
/r/MensRights14/09/12 06:35 PM
2

When I worked in a preschool a mother assumed that I wanted to molest her son, so she told all of the teachers and the director that I wasn't allowed near her son (luckily he wasn't in my class). The director decided to change my responsibilities so there was no chance that a parent couldn't accuse me of anything. At the time a youth soccer coach had just been accused of molesting the players on the team, and this was where the fear came from most likely. In the end, I just did my job, because I…
/r/MensRights14/09/12 06:33 PM
11

I didn't even get banned :(
/r/MensRights13/09/12 03:38 AM
1

I understand completely. I've been meaning to write a self post for awhile about labeling theory (criminology) and its effects on gender discussions and relations. The theory in itself states that when someone is labeled as a deviant by our justice system they tend to behave as a deviant regardless of their crime. Personally, I feel that this relates closely to the discussions we have on gender. When we use fear mongering with topics such as rape, and label women as victims and men as perverted …
/r/MensRights13/09/12 02:22 AM
1

So the minority of one group does something that offends the majority of the other, and the a minority of another group that does something that offends the majority of the other. It's a vicious cycle.
/r/MensRights13/09/12 02:03 AM
2

So...Can we be friends now?
/r/MensRights13/09/12 01:54 AM
2

I agree that many of them aren't valid when looking at rape overall. I personally haven't looked at individual studies, and I'm in no way an authority on the subject of risk factors for rape. However, just as you tore into me for my analogy, isn't creating this analogy just as offensive? Your original support of the "tell men not to rape" was supporting an offensive analogy. I feel like we are on the same page with a lot of things. I just feel that the best response to the rape prevention tips w…
/r/MensRights13/09/12 01:52 AM
1

I posted my comment before I saw your edit. Look at my other post and we can continue from there, buddy.
/r/MensRights13/09/12 01:41 AM
2

I just read your edit. I do agree that if you use the information to blame someone for what happened to them then you are victim blaming, but that shouldn't dissuade people from publishing studies that show how an individual can reduce their risk of an event happening. Now, the real question should be whether the quality of advice printed in the "rape tips" is actually empirically valid or just something someone came up with on the spot. That should be the real discussion and not just simply com…
/r/MensRights13/09/12 01:40 AM
1

Yes, I took the analogy to the extreme, but that's what analogies tend to do. Take a subject to the extreme to illustrate a point. The point boils down to that everything you do in life has some risk attached to it. You can choose to learn what these risks are, or you can remain blind to them. People don't publish risk factors for certain events to offend someone. In general, they're doing the opposite. They want you to be aware of these risk factors, so you have the opportunity to minimize the …
/r/MensRights13/09/12 01:34 AM
3

The reason they want to flip the script though is faulty. It's an inconvenient truth that rape exists in our world, but there are steps that one can take to minimize their risks. This is the same with every crime in existence. To inform is not to blame, and that's the problem with people that label preventative information as victim blaming. If there's a murderer that is only killing people wearing hats, would it be victim blaming to warn people that wearing a hat elevates their chances of being…
/r/MensRights13/09/12 12:48 AM
8

Crime prevention tips: Aimed towards those who are potential victims of a crime (AKA everyone) to minimize risk. Don't commit crime tips: Who is your target audience? Those who commit the crime? Do you really think that telling someone not to commit a crime by creating a pamphlet really works? Instead it ends up being given to people that aren't criminals who feel like they now have done something wrong. Crime prevention tips are about situational awareness, which everyone should have. This is w…
/r/MensRights12/09/12 10:18 PM
4

Adjust for inflation, and it might be a worthwhile read.
/r/MensRights12/09/12 10:11 PM
40

She's unjustified, because she's limiting your topic of discussion based upon your gender. Then, after limiting what you can talk about, attempted to flaunt her superiority as a female. You said she's a teacher, so your best bet is to approach an administrator at your school and file a complaint. You have some options for how you can do this, so choose from your options below (assuming you're in high school): Email the principal Email the principal and CC the superintendent of the school distric…
/r/MensRights12/09/12 08:00 AM
2

History of Male Circumcision on Wikipedia should be a decent place to start
/r/MensRights12/09/12 06:01 AM
9

Article text: A men's rights activist group says it's simply "opposing the marginalization and vilification of men and boys" by plastering misogynistic posters and leading coffee shop discussions in a liberal east Vancouver neighborhood that, for the most part, is resistant to the cause. But the group isn't so much pro-men as it is virulently anti-women. Do the members deserve the right to free speech? September has been a busy month for the Vancouver branch of the Men's Rights Movement (MRM), w…
/r/MensRights12/09/12 05:55 AM
2

My old roommate dated a girl much more unattractive than him. During college I was also an RA for a few years, and I saw many examples of guys dating girls less attractive than them. It happens, but it isn't widely publicized.
/r/MensRights05/09/12 07:52 PM
2

Well, the oxford dictionary defines sexism as: prejudice, stereotyping, or discrimination, typically against women, on the basis of sex. So you could go that route, but usually this argument stems from something that actually happened and you used the word sexist. I would go with "If you look in the dictionary you will see that the definition of sexism doesn't include anything about prejudice plus power. It only includes prejudice, stereotyping, or discrimination based on sex. But instead of arg…
/r/MensRights29/08/12 07:28 PM
–

Feminism typically defines sexism as prejudice plus power. What's annoying to me is that often when you hear this argument made it surrounds someone showing prejudice (using their definition scheme) and by arguing the misapplication of the word sexism by their definition completely disregards the actual issue that was being discussed. While the natural response to this definition in application to your situation is that the teacher has power, therefore she is meeting the definition of sexist, ma…
/r/MensRights29/08/12 04:52 PM
–

This is a publicity stunt and that's it. Let this go. The more attention the stunt gets, the more attention she gets. The month where men weren't allowed within the exhibit is over, and the only thing further attention is going to do is make her work more well known.
/r/MensRights27/08/12 06:08 PM
–

Well, it'd be easy to role play using this form of consent. Just play Mother May I.
/r/MensRights27/08/12 05:56 PM
91

What does his coworkers expect him to do? Regular pepper just isn't enough to season his food, so he carries around pepper spray. It's a perfectly logical reason.
/r/MensRights26/08/12 07:25 PM
1

While I understand your objection, but by having you do both treatments of the survey you would be introducing another type of bias. Once the individual found out what the goal of the research is (as would be easy in this case) they would not want to show themselves to be sexist, therefore they would answer similarly. Therefore, by randomly assigning the treatment in the survey they are obtaining asymptotically efficient results with their tests (statistical proofs for this exists). While it is …
/r/MensRights26/08/12 12:52 PM
–

Doing this is a valid method of reporting. Even though now everyone who reads this thread knows what the study is, thus biasing it even more. However, to back the validity of this methodology, if you take a large cross-section of the population you are interested in and present a scenario then you can theoretically compare this one treatment to another as long as you are controlling for everything except for that one factor. So if they are maintaining the same general cross-section of their popu…
/r/MensRights26/08/12 11:52 AM
–

I don't know how your girlfriend was planning to find participants for her survey, but congratulations on biasing her study. I'm not trying to rip into you, but with studies like this your goal is to obtain a cross-section of the general population of the area of study. By posting it here you are going to obtain a disproportionate number of responses from MR members, thus purposely introducing bias into the study. If you are polite then you should inform your girlfriend of you posting this here …
/r/MensRights26/08/12 10:47 AM
7

Back when I worked in a preschool, kids would often run the first time they saw me, but after the first few days I quickly became their favorite teacher. It has a lot to do with them not having a lot of positive male influences in their early life.
/r/MensRights01/08/12 12:58 AM
–

Clearly he wanted it. Didn't you see how he was dressed? And he was acting all fatherly...
/r/MensRights30/07/12 01:57 AM
1

So you expect to see a high level of multicollinearity between the variables. You would need to see the original research to see if they tested for that hypothesis, and if they accommodated their analysis if the problem existed.
/r/MensRights28/07/12 12:43 AM
1

I would state it probably has more to do with media interpretation of the research, but as I said before I haven't read the original paper. It's just that the media tends to pick and choose research and disregard what it's truly saying to create their own story.
/r/MensRights28/07/12 12:39 AM
–

Ok, so I haven't seen the actual study, but I'm going to make an assumption about the data and the analysis. In the article they didn't specify that being male caused you to be a bully, but instead a risk factor for getting into fights. What this translates to is the researcher most likely collected data on fights within schools, ran some form of regression, and found that "male" along with five other traits escalated the probability of being involved in a fight. So before we get our boxers in a…
/r/MensRights27/07/12 10:32 PM
–

I disagree with him being a fool in the essence that he only had a few seconds to decide what to do and his instinct was to save someone he loved. His actions didn't guarantee his death, he just lowered the probability of his girlfriend being killed by pushing her under the seat. Sadly he was killed, but that had nothing to do with him being a fool.
/r/MensRights22/07/12 06:53 AM
1

This is more of a commentary on wording and not necessarily addressing your point, but utility is the wrong word to use here. Utility is mainly applicable within utility theory. Instead your argument lies within the theory of the firm. Therefore it would be that since the company will obtain a lower marginal product of labor for their hires then the salary will be lower because in theory an individuals wage should be their marginal product of labor. Again, not really commenting on your argument,…
/r/MensRights22/07/12 05:35 AM
–

Why do you say he died a fool? As someone who has stood between a man with a gun and his girlfriend I'd like to say it wasn't her gender that made me take that action but the fact that it was someone that I cared for. I'd do the same for my father and friends.
/r/MensRights22/07/12 05:26 AM
6

I believe this summarizes what you're describing. It gets posted here every now and then.
/r/MensRights10/07/12 03:49 AM
3

Further information about the case that followed.
/r/MensRights30/06/12 08:23 PM
1

According to the US Department of Justice incarceration data as of Mid-2011 Males made up about 87% of the prison population. Assuming a uniform distribution for exoneration it isn't surprising that 9 out of 10 people exonerated were men. What were you trying to emphasize with that statement?
/r/MensRights24/05/12 07:46 PM
1

Surprised this paper wasn't referenced.
/r/MensRights18/05/12 09:57 AM
–

Me: Wow, this is coming from Jezebel?... and it basically goes without saying that these stories got a disproportionate amount of coverage when you consider the number of anonymous women being beaten. ...sigh
/r/MensRights05/05/12 09:20 PM
2

You said you learned a few things about what women face. Care to share?
/r/MensRights04/05/12 08:34 PM
–

One recent survey found that 89 percent of girls 10 to 18 years of age had been the subject of sexual comments, gestures and looks. Eighty-three percent said they had been touched, pinched or grabbed. This statement means nothing without comparing the results of the same survey with men. I can easily state that during those ages I was the subject of sexual comments, gestures, and looks along with having been touched, pinched, or grabbed at least once. On top of that, is the distribution of the a…
/r/MensRights02/05/12 06:19 AM
–

I'm currently in the process of getting in shape, and every time I go to the free weight section of the gym I also feel intimidated and out of place. I've heard people make fun of me for lifting "baby weights," and it made me want to quit. The thing is, I don't want time dedicated to me in the weight room for being an out of shape male. I had to ask myself if I wanted to get in shape or be scared off by the thought of people judging me. (For those who care, I chose get in shape)
/r/MensRights25/04/12 04:29 AM
2

I honestly don't know the answers to your questions, however I would suggest posting in /r/daddit, /r/Parenting , or /r/Mommit. I'm sure many of them are from the US and recent parents, so they should have an up to date account of childcare in the US (though it will be observational and not empirical answers).
/r/MensRights16/04/12 09:21 AM
–

To be fair, I was the one that found the SRD thread and posted it on MR. The comment wasn't deleted when I originally posted it. The radfem forum was mentioned in the original message. The reason I found the SRD forum so quickly was I was taking my "morning constitutional" while browsing SRD on my phone and stumbled across it. I posted it here when I got back to my laptop. I've only been briefly following everything going on with the sisterofblackvisions thing, so I have no idea where the accusa…
/r/MensRights13/04/12 04:42 PM
5

Thank you for grabbing the screen shot. I never think to do that for some reason.
/r/MensRights13/04/12 04:04 PM
–

Here's the cached article from google (if the link is still down) and for those who don't want to give views to the page. For the past week, I’ve been following a story that has appeared on Manboobz and Jezebel about a jaw-dropping thread in Reddit’s Men’s Rights subreddit (which was recently designated a hate site by the Southern Poverty Law Center). The thread was posted on April 1 and was obviously shitthatneverhappened.txt: a man was asking for help because a woman he had sex with grabbed th…
/r/MensRights08/04/12 11:51 PM
5

I'm getting less work to account for her demands that we don't have to work together, and boss is powerless to do anything. Sounds like some form of lasting damages.
/r/MensRights20/03/12 11:41 AM
9

You mention the possibility of her being charged with a false police report. Did she actually call the police? (You didn't really mention it one way or the other)
/r/MensRights20/03/12 11:33 AM
2

It's more of it's been established that she didn't actually do it, but it's more of an argument as to whether or not shoving a cork up someones ass while they sleep would be considered rape. Yeah, I posted this to Men's Rights while pissed off, and now that I relaxed I realize I shouldn't have posted this here. I'm contemplating just deleting the thread, but I always hate deleting posts just because I changed my mind.
/r/MensRights16/03/12 09:13 PM
2

She admits in the comments that she didn't actually do it.
/r/MensRights16/03/12 10:22 AM
2

The only thing that I want to say to her is it might be her son, but it's his body.
/r/MensRights07/03/12 04:52 AM
12

The city medical examiner said that the cause of death was “disseminated herpes simplex virus Type 1, complicating ritual circumcision with oral suction.” While it is not known who performed that circumcision, there have been several cases in New York in recent years of babies contracting herpes from the ultra-Orthodox ritual known as metzizah b’peh, when blood is removed from the baby's wound by the rabbi's or mohel's mouth. In the United States there are many laws that incorporate negligence i…
/r/MensRights06/03/12 09:51 AM
1

You have to wonder though what can she really do to "make amends." It doesn't sound like she has any way to pay him back, and it doesn't sound like she was willing. It's very possible the only thing she would be willing to do is email him and explain it to him, but one could view that as also selfish. By emailing him she could give him hope or completely crush him (depending on how she approaches it), while absolving herself of the guilt of her actions. It is very possible the best thing she can…
/r/MensRights06/03/12 09:35 AM
3

Will you post later how the discussion went?
/r/MensRights05/03/12 08:34 AM
0

Based on your criteria we can discredit any movement. We should judge a movement on its message and collective action. One person's post on a website whose goal is to generate views can't be used to debase an entire movement. If you look down in the comments you can see that many people are critical of the article. While I enjoyed the contribution of your article to the subreddit, you can't use it to state that all feminists are insane. The only statement that you can make is that the author of …
/r/MensRights28/02/12 05:28 AM
3

It's dude (thanks for asking), I was just saying that I don't care whether she's a feminist or not, it's her being tactless by writing the article celebrating the death of an individual. Blaming all feminists for one individuals lack of tact is a misstep that demonizes MRA's to people that we need to support us down the road. Even though she wrote "the most influential feminist article in the last few years," I would expect those that follower her not to support blasting an individuals work righ…
/r/MensRights28/02/12 04:45 AM
7

I wouldn't even say "feminists have no shame" to this. This is just an attention craving individual that is willing to capitalize on a topical individuals death to move their name into the spotlight.
/r/MensRights28/02/12 04:24 AM
2

So I clicked through the links trying to find the original phrasing of the poll, but I didn't have much luck. The phrasing of the poll has a large part of eliciting the response, but alas I couldn't find the original question. There's also the issue of whether or not the poll is able to obtain revealed preferences from the sample group (this again goes into phrasing and the context of the question). However it was revealed that it was an online poll which lends itself to heavy bias. The final ar…
/r/MensRights25/02/12 08:02 AM
1

It's the internet. People like to "troll" due to the anonymity. There's really no point in getting upset about it, because it only encourages them to continue.
/r/MensRights24/02/12 07:40 PM
6

There have been instances in the past of people posting fake sob stories and then editing them later on to make the subreddit look bad.
/r/MensRights24/02/12 08:46 AM
33

In an episode of Dadagiri: Beat the Bullies, the actress playing the role of "Esha, the Goddess" slapped a contestant, Ravi Bhatia, in the face after instigating a brief, antagonistic verbal exchange. In response he slapped her, and then kept saying 'How can she slap?". This resulted in the male host (and several other members of the crew) attacking Bhatia, with the crew appearing to be slow in breaking them up. The male host also used offensive and threatening language toward Bhatia. Bhatia sub…
/r/MensRights29/01/12 10:26 AM
3

From this story, "civilians first" seems more like the proper statement.
/r/MensRights24/01/12 11:23 PM
5

There are 'troll' subreddits out there.
/r/MensRights24/12/11 07:44 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter