TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

IQstabilizers Archive

View 0 posts and 59 comments by IQstabilizers on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Every sub has their sensitive spots
/r/AntiFeminists25/05/22 10:56 PM
1

Why is this here?
/r/AntiFeminists15/04/22 05:52 AM
1

“drawbacks, but Victimizing yourself cause of past trauma and projecting your negativity onto society won't help anybody” the irony
/r/AntiFeminists15/04/22 05:24 AM
1

“Innocent until PROVEN guilty, beyond a reasonable doubt” yes for the legal system. The regular observers can just be quiet until the investigation is through instead of siding with anyone before a decision is made.
/r/AntiFeminists15/04/22 05:11 AM
2

You talking about the history of not legally being able to own land and get high paying jobs?
/r/AntiFeminists06/04/22 09:03 PM
2

Ah yeah ofc it doesn’t. Any women that’s angry and also single is because she’s single and any woman that’s angry in a relationship doesn’t exist. Sound logic there mate.
/r/AntiFeminists06/04/22 06:59 PM
2

“please show me where did i say that people need to be in relationship to be happy?”- “going against their bology.” The constant blame of feminism is I suppose appropriate as that’s the sub. However men face the same problem and it’s been a problem far before feminism. Stating someone “needs” a partner is false. And lets talk about the millions of single women that are independent and don’t boast? Are they not to be integrated into the data? Blaming someone’s mental instability on not being in a…
/r/AntiFeminists06/04/22 06:48 PM
1

One you didn’t answer my original question. Next there’s millions of single people that live an independent life without a partner that don’t have anger issues or cats.( do you honestly believe that once you get into a relationship/ “renounce feminism” all your problems end it’s not a fairytale plus couples own cats…). Also do you think anger issues just popped up with feminism? People don’t need a romantic relationship to be happy.
/r/AntiFeminists06/04/22 06:35 PM
1

Yes. The belief that people “need” a romantic partner to be complete or happy just sounds like bs
/r/AntiFeminists06/04/22 06:24 PM
0

I’m assuming you’d say the opposite isn’t true
/r/AntiFeminists06/04/22 06:09 PM
1

Never said it wasn’t harmful I’m just not saying it’s a quota. Unless you got something concrete idk.
/r/AntiFeminists12/02/22 06:13 AM
0

Obviously… based on what? You say quotas but that’s an assumption you made. There were no female f-35 pilots so the first one was going to get press. Quotas can be harmful but you have no evidence she is beyond your own opinions.
/r/AntiFeminists12/02/22 05:49 AM
1

And? You have no info on what actually happened jumping to conclusions proves nothing. Does your thought process follow other “first of x group”? Do you say the first Native American astronaut didn’t actually deserve it because they’re a quota simply because they’re the first.
/r/AntiFeminists12/02/22 05:38 AM
1

Indirectly? Interpreting the “first female” or the first of x group to obtain something doesn’t mean a quota. There’s no further detail on what happened. Acting on limited info to fit a preconceived notion when it’s known that crashes happen.
/r/AntiFeminists12/02/22 05:27 AM
1

Where? It only states that flying is a gender equalizer. It’s like saying men and women can compete on the same level in this profession.
/r/AntiFeminists11/02/22 09:52 PM
0

And you know that because?
/r/AntiFeminists11/02/22 03:38 PM
-5

What does this have to do with feminism?
/r/AntiFeminists11/02/22 03:25 PM
-4

“Starting talking s&@€# in your face for no reason just because they think you’re wrong” Are you sure it’s just them?
/r/AntiFeminists10/02/22 10:54 PM
1

I want to see the opposite and see how triggered the sun gets about generalizing a population
/r/AntiFeminists07/02/22 09:04 PM
1

“They take the small segment of a group within a population and expand that to apply to all” that’s funny.
/r/AntiFeminists07/02/22 08:52 PM
1

You definitely worded your response poorly. Plus coming to antifeminist wasn’t gonna clear that up. They’re not here to discuss actual arguments just blame primarily women.
/r/AntiFeminists07/02/22 04:28 AM
4

I’m not getting how her denying a guy sex makes her a horrible person. It has nothing to do with what he or she owes the other person it’s just a good thing. Doing something good doesn’t mean you get anything out of it and if the only reason you do good is to get a reward I’m not sure you’re a good person. Plus this sub probably can’t see that far as the only thing that matters is women = bad and men = good.
/r/AntiFeminists07/02/22 01:08 AM
1

I think you missed most of what I said. You’re getting worked up over examples that have to further my point. “Who do you think you’re talking to anyway” idk some random person on Reddit am I supposed to believe you just because you say so? Aren’t you the one suggesting that women had been “okay” simply because some women had acquired an education and that history wasn’t true based off that alone? Women in 1917 were treated poorly like immigrants or people of color. Simply stating some didn’t fa…
/r/AntiFeminists04/02/22 01:24 AM
1

You talk about reality however you statement about how “but numerically it wasn’t as if they weren’t attending” as if that explains that they had a lower not simply because they didn’t want to attend it was because they couldn’t. I never said that there weren’t outliers however they weren’t the norm. An example would be Little Rock 9 yes African Americans were allowed education but unequal in where they could go and the quality. You talk about people of color and immigrants. Just because there w…
/r/AntiFeminists04/02/22 12:12 AM
1

The reason women have had a higher shift is due to a basic gaining of rights and increased opportunities that they didn’t have prior. If you were transported to the 1950 you see a pretty substantial change in mens behavior but I agree that womens change is more.
/r/MensRights03/02/22 10:35 PM
1

Do you really believe that men have the exact roles as they did in the 1950s?
/r/MensRights03/02/22 09:38 PM
1

Gender roles have definitely changed for both genders. For women it might be more drastic as they’re going form the home into the workforce and men being able to be stay at home. The roles don’t change unless both choose to move.
/r/MensRights03/02/22 09:21 PM
0

The sun is predominantly showing how wrong women are. It’s not equal in “taking responsibility”. There may be people pointing it out but they’re just getting down voted.
/r/AntiFeminists02/02/22 07:39 PM
1

https://www.reddit.com/r/antifeminists/comments/s7gvb2/i_say_a_what_yall_say/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=iossmf
/r/AntiFeminists02/02/22 07:28 PM
0

A few? It’s pretty prominent on this sub
/r/AntiFeminists02/02/22 07:18 PM
1

We’re is that the case on it sub?
/r/AntiFeminists02/02/22 07:08 PM
0

Well if you look at how anti feminist treat women then it’s easy to see. Very rarely do you see someone on here that’s actually anti against sexism as a whole. It’s just one sided.
/r/AntiFeminists02/02/22 06:07 PM
1

The primary reason for male only drafts is due to men and women being against it. It’s linked to traditional beliefs which he knows won’t change anytime soon
/r/MensRights02/02/22 06:01 PM
1

Then why in the community so heavily against on sex and pro the other sex. If antifeminism is anti all sexism then there should be some what equal representation of men and women doing bad or good.
/r/AntiFeminists02/02/22 05:57 PM
1

If the patriarchy is a myth. What’s the reasoning behind the belief that feminism is all encompassing and ruins the lives of all men? Or that women are making the world to benefit them?
/r/MensRights02/02/22 05:55 PM
1

This whole community is an overreaction. One we get no description of the dress( the pic seems to be a later addition). They’re in a relationship meaning they’re both free to express themselves. Simply because he doesn’t like her dress doesn’t make her a whore. He has every right to leave if he chooses. That’s the funny thing about how “bad” the world is neither party experienced any blowback in their individual lives for their decision. Just a bunch of people calling a women a whore and prostit…
/r/AntiFeminists02/02/22 05:42 PM
0

Ah yes “retarded prostitutes” isn’t demonizing women. If he has the right to feel insecure and mistrusting she has the right to be able to wear what she wants. A relationship is two free people joining each other just because she doesn’t wear what the guy wants doesn’t make her a whore.
/r/AntiFeminists02/02/22 05:31 PM
1

How exactly do you plan on fixing it? I hear a lot blaming and talk about “privilege” but no actual answers. Especially the people that are talking about feminism do you think these problems just popped up in the last 100 years?
/r/MensRights02/02/22 05:24 PM
1

Idk how women created those problems…
/r/MensRights02/02/22 05:19 PM
1

Was that the norm and how early are we talking about?
/r/AntiFeminists01/02/22 12:41 PM
1

“I don’t see any sexism towards women”. If that’s your mind set why would they care about you? You don’t care about what happens to them and then spreading lies. If anti women actions don’t bother then you aren’t anti all sexism just the sect that you choose. Sexism happens to both men and women and should be stoped. https://www.reddit.com/r/soccer/comments/sg39af/mason_greenwoods_ex_girlfriend_accusing_him_of/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=iossmf
/r/AntiFeminists31/01/22 08:40 PM
1

Since you’re blind https://www.reddit.com/r/NoahGetTheBoat/comments/sgwasv/a_20_yr_old_woman_was_being_paraded_with/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=iossmf
/r/AntiFeminists31/01/22 08:30 PM
1

You seem delusional. If you don’t count the women being treated like property by men as anti women then idk what anti men even is. Your idea that women have never been oppressed by men is a flawed one that purposely avoids any human history. You wanna talk about why they didn’t because they didn’t have the education and where killed or abused for speaking out. You know the funny thing is that you keep saying some women opposed women’s suffrage but keep avoiding the fact that a majority of women …
/r/AntiFeminists31/01/22 08:06 PM
1

“There exists no massive multinational political movement that constantly antagonizes Women in the same way Feminism antagonizes Men.” Where is this massive organization that antagonizes men? Next you stating the “white feather movement” doesn’t change the fact that women were treated like property with no rights. Forcibly left without education and inability to hold land. Just because some women stood against it means nothing as many more stood for it. Women of current day( and the past have he…
/r/AntiFeminists30/01/22 09:53 PM
1

So what do you mean by fixing it? Previous feminist movements were meant to allow women the right to vote, own property and finically independent. None of those things are anti men. The people that stood it it’s way were anti women. What exactly are you trying to change and you can’t possibly believe that sexism is only happening cause of “feminism” or solely by women. It’s a two party problem and fixing one doesn’t work if both aren’t fixed.
/r/AntiFeminists30/01/22 09:18 PM
1

I don’t see you fighting women haters… it’s simple we need both creating divide won’t help anyone.
/r/AntiFeminists30/01/22 08:48 PM
1

“Why should you care” they’re half the population… if you want to discuss the history of anti men in feminism you gonna also look at the anti women treatment until the present day.
/r/AntiFeminists30/01/22 08:23 PM
1

I’m not pro “modern feminism” it’s less about supporting women than in the past and pushes other things. My only thing is that you may be that way but there’s a lot of Tradcons on here that seem to want the “go back to the kitchen” idea.
/r/AntiFeminists30/01/22 07:16 PM
1

One there’s literally a post on here trying to down play the severity of the treatment of women pre women’s suffrage. Or the idea that “feminism” is the reason that divorce rate is lower than in the 20th century. (Not thinking that divorce overall is just more acceptable). Or thinking that women and men being promiscuous is different like getting a one night stand is more or less the same for either sex. My point is that a lot of the post here are just playing the blame game. Anti sexism would b…
/r/AntiFeminists30/01/22 06:01 PM
1

From some of the comments that’s debatable. Just seems to be trying to blame others and trying to lessen serious problems.
/r/AntiFeminists30/01/22 05:06 PM
-1

Just relating to how anti feminism does the same shit
/r/AntiFeminists30/01/22 10:01 AM
0

So it being hard means that it’s better than women. It’s bad both ways they’re both promiscuous. Seems like just a way to demonize women for doing the exact thing men do. I’m sure for a one night stand the guy doesn’t have to be the top 1%.
/r/AntiFeminists30/01/22 01:07 AM
-1

Making everything about me? The entire sub isn’t about taking responsibility it’s about blaming and making claims that aren’t founded then calling anyone that has a different opinion the problem. The post is only looking at women who are half of marriages. Is feminism the sole reason for a lower marriage rate? Or is it the fact the divorce became more acceptable over time and women were able to be financially dependent on men. What’s the goal? What do you think will fix the problem? Forcing wome…
/r/AntiFeminists30/01/22 12:57 AM
-1

Ahh a different opinion than you. Anti feminism is just as bad as toxic feminism. Just throwing blame on the other sex. The op “why does this matter?” can be summarized by divorce being more available, people overall having more sex and women having to both work and still do all other domestic activities. If you want to sit there and blame “feminism” for everything under the sun you can cope :)
/r/AntiFeminists29/01/22 10:37 PM
2

Thought this sub was anti feminism not anti women
/r/AntiFeminists29/01/22 08:39 PM
-8

And antifeminism blames women for everything but not themselves…
/r/AntiFeminists29/01/22 08:24 PM
-3

I guess beating your wife isn’t toxic and shot shaming women for anything? Wild how anti shit just becomes shit
/r/AntiFeminists29/01/22 08:22 PM
1

What’s that have to do with her inability to get an education?
/r/AntiFeminists29/01/22 08:19 PM
1

So what exactly is your point? That Julie shouldn’t have the right to get an education because John was forced to go to war? What’s that have to do with gender equality? Now women can join the army and potentially be drafted in the future.
/r/AntiFeminists29/01/22 08:18 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter