TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

IRageAlot Archive

View 1 post and 77 comments by IRageAlot on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

It is not my job to not get hot a bothered about something. Also you stating that not getting hot and bothered by something deligitimizes it is speculation, a common speculation, but still speculative. This woman said something pathetic, and some people called her on it. We don't have to not call her on it cause she did it on her own playing field. There is a deep absurdity in the idea that we shouldn't chastise idiots when they behave like idiots in front of fellow idiots. I frankly don't care …
/r/MensRights15/02/11 09:22 PM
4

Masturbating > dealing with the kind of fucks that frequent bars
/r/MensRights15/02/11 05:39 PM
2

One of her tips is to aproach the bartender, point to a random guy in the bar, and say "that guys spilled my drink" in hopes that the bartender will replace it and put it on that guys tab.
/r/MensRights15/02/11 05:36 PM
2

I can get on board with that.
/r/MensRights15/02/11 05:25 PM
3

Would you permit attention-whore, or maybe drink-whore?
/r/MensRights15/02/11 05:17 PM
1

I'm with you on that
/r/MensRights15/02/11 05:15 PM
3

Wether the guy is dumb enough to do it or not is beside the point. The article is an example of a girl who has had this female entitlement hammered into her head to the point that she can write something as absolutely absurd as what she did without any knowledge of how stupid it was.
/r/MensRights15/02/11 04:58 PM
1

Modiika makes a post on how this article totally fails to be a news flash. Shock horror. An uncaring condescending asshole on the internet. SHOCK. CALL THE COPSSSSSSSSSSSSS
/r/MensRights15/02/11 04:56 PM
1

Woman. Fixed that for you. I only saw one low-life's name on that article.
/r/MensRights15/02/11 04:53 PM
2

So you don't take drinks from men cause you are afraid they are going to rape you? Am I reading into what you said too much? If not... how is the a solution. Shouldn't we be empowering our girls to buy their own drinks because we don't want to make them feel entitled cause they have a vagina, not because they are scared of the mean-man raping them... If I did indeed read into that too much, then just tell me to go eat a shit sandwich.
/r/MensRights15/02/11 04:50 PM
1

I've had arguments with two guys that felt the need to mention this book in the middle of their arguments. They were both pieces of shit that thought women were all trash, and thought themselves to be a good catch. I don't know what this book is, but it seems to have the magical power to turn guys into pieces of shit. I understand how wrong it is to say this, but I'm assuming you are also a piece of shit since you read it.
/r/MensRights15/02/11 04:47 PM
5

Mens Rights is not just about legal equality. There is no problem with someone linking an example of a woman feeling entitled to something by men in general. It reduces men to a wallet with legs, and that is perfectly fine for MRAs to get upset about. Just as groups seeking female equality or womens rights might get upset about women being reduced to tits with legs (or legs with legs?). Consider a group centered around black rights. Someone links and article about "How to make black people shine…
/r/MensRights15/02/11 04:41 PM
7

He's not permitted to call a low-life a filthy name? If he called her a piece of shit, would you step up to bat for her because she isn't actually made of human waste? Give it up... she's a shitty person and he called her a naughty word. |Seriously? Do you really despise females that much? I don't know... Do you really despise males that much? I mean you did speak out against ONE of them, just as he spoke out against ONE female.
/r/MensRights15/02/11 04:35 PM
4

Yeah, but at the end of the night you just fucked some girl who is ok with screwing guys she meets in bars. Why would you want to fuck someone who fucks people like you?
/r/MensRights15/02/11 04:29 PM
1

How about a NSFW?
/r/MensRights14/02/11 08:51 PM
1

Then what happens if you don't accept my 2nd claim supporting the first? Then I have to defend that one as well? That seems a tad illogical when any claim I make you can simply counter with "wrong!", without providing any counter claim. I resubmit, that you can do better than that. Scratch that, in response to what you just posted, I say that it is not sound, not accurate, and not at all reasonable. Please accept this as me shifting the burden back to you to establish that what you just said, ab…
/r/MensRights11/02/11 10:32 PM
1

You can do better than just saying something is innacurate.
/r/MensRights11/02/11 08:31 PM
1

Hmmm... nah. There is plenty of room on reddit for those in the know, and for us jackasses that spew their ignorant opinions all over the place.
/r/MensRights11/02/11 08:30 PM
2

nope =) It is blocked for me at work. I had to gather what it was about from reading comments. If what you say is the case then I retract my comment. I would still question what the point is in plastering a toddler all over the net when one could make a statement about it without bringing the kid into it.
/r/MensRights11/02/11 08:11 PM
1

Of course he should have the right to dress as Daphne, and nobody has said anything to the contrary. The problem is it is wrong for a parent to use their child as a political pawn to get a point across. Imagine an advertisement to stop domestic abuse, in the photo is a 2 year old boy playing in the sand, he is smiling, and the caption reads, "when I grow up i'm going to beat my wife"
/r/MensRights11/02/11 07:34 PM
2

She is still exploiting her son to make a political statement. Gay rights is a worthy cause, and a worthy cause doesn't need to stoop to the level of using toddlers to get their point across; it can stand on its own feet, unaided by petty tactics. Also, her son asking to do this establishes as little as the child of a WBC member asking to wear a "god hates fags" shirt. Parents are there to look out for the best interest of their children, and there is no reason she should be tossing her 4 year o…
/r/MensRights11/02/11 07:32 PM
2

It doesn't matter if he wants to dress up as a girl. It is simple exploitation. Imagine instead of "my son is gay", to fight sexual biggots, it was perhaps... "my daughter wishes she was aborted" to fight pro-lifers, or "my daughter loves cock!" to fight conservative cencorship. How about WBC protesting a funeral with a 4 year old wearing a shirt that says, "god hates fags", or even something less offensive like "obama sucks", or "fuck bush!". A good parent doesn't exploit their children for pol…
/r/MensRights11/02/11 07:25 PM
8

That is like saying removing the nose will help in car wrecks cause it won't be there to break. Anyone who is concerned about making contact with the steering wheel will wear a seatbelt. Anyone concerned about STD prevention will wear a condom. Once that condom is on the whole argument is nullified. Personally i've only had vaginal sex with 1 person, my wife. So why don't I have my foreskin? I'm not at risk for an STD... so why was I snipped? Also... circumcision can be done without removal of t…
/r/MensRights27/01/11 06:08 PM
1

Look, I can say the majority of prisoners are black, and get away with not being tagged a racist. I could even push the boundaries when my car is broken into and say that it was probably a black kid. If I wrote a whole article about how black people are mostly criminals, assessed my neighbors as criminals even though I never saw them commit a crime, and didn't have a decent read on them. Propped myself up as being above them even though I commit crimes myself but excuse it because i'm looking fo…
/r/MensRights25/01/11 07:49 PM
1

You would describe her as quite stupid, even thought that is a gender reversal of your situation. I think you saw that too with you weak attempt to defend it by saying there are alot of nice boys, but there are no nice girls. It would be a decent defense if it didn't stem from your ridiculous perspectives that girls are whores. Your first paragraph does nothing to dispell your shitty perspective on women. This girl was a virgin, wasn't trying to fuck you right away, and you can even admit that i…
/r/MensRights25/01/11 02:44 PM
1

A virgin who wouldn't put out.... and experience led your to believe she was a slut.... sounds like you've had alot of negative experience. Are we believe that all that negative experience, that leads you to bad character assesments on people, hasn't left you jaded towards the oposite sex. It's hard to dismiss that you assumed a virgin who wouldn't put out was a slut. How would you assess a girl who thought most guys were fuck-happy, and ran around screwing dudes constantly because she wanted di…
/r/MensRights24/01/11 08:06 PM
1

Lets try it this way. You said: it took several months for me to realize she wasn't just another slut. FYI, she didn't put out right away. Why would you automatically presume a girl is a slut? If that doesn't illustrate a character flaw within yourself then what would. Why would you continue to assume a girl is a slut, for several months, when she was doing the oposite of what a slut does, put out with barely any prompting. You said yourself she didn't put out right away... isn't that contrary t…
/r/MensRights24/01/11 03:15 PM
2

Wow, you are a piece of work. Perhaps you can push her away enough that a reasonable man who would care about her can take over. You managed to assess mental retardation from that? Not only mental retardation but "flippin'" mental retardation. I'd take the bet that you read the whole thing and it hit home. Seriously, around a thousand word essay on why you are a terrible human being, and an all around bad person, and all you can manage in response is "flippin' 'tard". I tell you that your girlfr…
/r/MensRights24/01/11 03:07 PM
2

I've never really poked my nose into the femenist stuff, thought I had always assumed they were sexist. Which I think says alot about their movement when the average american views it as sexist. That would make me jump to the conclusion that it really is, but I have no place making that judgement. I think we do agree, I was just having fun calling the OP a jack ass.
/r/MensRights21/01/11 02:53 PM
3

Wow, you are a piece of work. I hope you can straighten yourself out for your girlfriends sake. All that stuff you said may or may not be true, we'll assume its all true because it doesnt matter. What matters is you took all that time to piece together all this negative shit about women to paint a shitty picture of them. Even your girlfriend isn't exempt from this, you've basically said she's a piece of shit, but she's good enough and you love her. You must be a romantic. What did you say about …
/r/MensRights20/01/11 03:39 PM
1

Don't beat yourself up about it, I forgive you =) </joke>
/r/MensRights20/01/11 02:59 PM
2

My point is that that is not what the majority of people are about. That is what this guy is about. I understand that he is unhappy and maybe that is making him callous towards women, but none the less that isn't acceptible behavior. Women aren't the problem, he is. I've got a woman at home and she is fantastic, trustworthy, hard working, caring, and lets me get away with murder.
/r/MensRights20/01/11 02:58 PM
1

He worded something poorly that sounded eerily similar to Christian Appologist bullshit. He explained what he meant and i'm fine with that. I didn't apologize because I don't feel sorry. I'm ok with the monaker of jerk as well. How would you feel if your neighbor was sitting in your living room with your wife, and said "I'm going home, the women there aren't ugly." Personally I'd flip out, and after he explained that he didn't mean my wife was ugly I wouldn't apologize for sticking up for myself…
/r/MensRights20/01/11 02:31 AM
0

Sorry, I forgot for a moment that when people speak the listener writes down the words verbatim and gets his dictionary out. I thought for a second that people use typically speach patterns to express ideas that don't always stick with the literal meanings of phrases. For example, when I ask my wife if she wants Chillis, or TGI Fridays, and she says Chilli's sucks, I shouldn't start heading to TGI Fridays because she didn't say that's what she wanted. I should ask her the question again and agai…
/r/MensRights19/01/11 10:58 PM
0

Logic, my friend, logic. Stating you use logic does not make it so. For example, I have two boxes, both labeled crackers. If I point to the left one and say there "are still some crackers in this box" what does it say about the right box? It wouldn't be a misinterpretation to assume they mean the other box is empty. If it is not empty it would be considered that the speaker misspoke. If I had said the box on the right is 100% full of crackers that wouldn't lead the listener to necessarily think …
/r/MensRights19/01/11 09:56 PM
1

I'd appologize but I guess I just behave irrationally when a stranger calls my wife a whore because she doesnt worship the god of abraham.
/r/MensRights19/01/11 09:34 PM
3

I didn't put down religion, I just said "fuck you" cause I didn't like what you said. You put down non traditional religion and non-religious perspectives and painted their proponents as unfaithfull whores. Personally, i'm an atheist, i'm 28 years old and have only had sex with 1 woman, my wife. Do you have any kind of evidence that members of traditional religion are somehow more faithful or are you just making an assumption. I'd happily read any evidence you have, but if you are just making an…
/r/MensRights19/01/11 09:26 PM
4

I'm a man in my late 20's. I make alot of money, but I'm not like those rich assholes since I had to work for it. IM SMART! I can seduce women easily, but this isn absolutely NOT bragging because I used to have trouble with them. I'm good with the ladies, and I overcome obstacles. I'm awesome. I've got the money, dollar dollar bill yall, and alot of bitches, but I'm so egotistic that i'm still not happy with it. The world is not enough. I've managed to only put my dick in ONE girl for four month…
/r/MensRights19/01/11 08:53 PM
0

and fuck you too EDIT: Oh, I guess I should take that back. Since atheist/agnostic/wicca women are all filthy filthy whores.
/r/MensRights19/01/11 08:26 PM
-1

fuck you
/r/MensRights19/01/11 08:26 PM
2

I'm ok with segregating morons like the OP. How will MensRights ever gain traction with jack asses like this guy misrepresenting themselves as a MensRights participant.
/r/MensRights19/01/11 08:25 PM
0

What the fuck are Christian values? It's regretable that I can only downvote you once.
/r/MensRights19/01/11 08:23 PM
1

Thats what I read too.
/r/MensRights19/01/11 08:21 PM
1

Moving out is not a financially possible option at this time. Why? Join the military. Get a roommate. Get an efficiency appartment. Collect evidence by your tape recorder. Lie to her to make her calm down till you are in a better position. Get her on tape saying you've never abused her. Prompt her, "i've never laid a hand on you, why do you think I would?" Hell, prompt her about your dad, "Did dad ever get physically abusive with you?" Prompt her on tape about it being ok for women to hit men. "…
/r/MensRights19/01/11 07:21 PM
5

Just so you know, don't tell me women are not all the same and I just have to find the right one. If you think that, you don't know women and god help you because you're in for a lot of trouble. I think it is apparent who doesn't know women. I personally don't want you in MensRights with that kind of BS. How would you feel if a woman said Men are all the same. You sound shallow and hopeless. Women are NOT all the same. but we aren't going to tell you the find the right one, because you need to w…
/r/MensRights19/01/11 06:24 PM
4

You're right, I was only trying to illustrate that their whole argument is a semantics debate. They are sticking up for feminism when feminism can have some pretty shitty ideals. They identify as a feminist, and are sticking up for their identity but they have no real reason to label themself that.
/r/MensRights14/01/11 04:52 PM
5

the MensRights terminiology came out of the fact that men were oppressed, and people continue to use it. Will you use the new term "MensRights"?
/r/MensRights14/01/11 04:15 PM
6

That doesn't matter... the point is if they don't want to be associated with the femenists that are nutjobs then they shouldn't call themselves femenists. When people attack femenists on here they are using it as a label for those women who think they are superior. Why are you not getting it. Proving that there are femenists who don't suck doesnt prove your point, it proves ours that you have to actually make the effert to show they aren't all bad. You effort displays that some of them are bad, …
/r/MensRights14/01/11 04:14 PM
8

This is from femenist.com Feminist.com is a thriving online community fostering awareness, education and activism for women all across the world. We serve as the Internet’s definitive hub for resources and information dedicated to women's equality, justice, wellness and safety. Like a "feminist Google," Feminist.com facilitates connections between women and the many, varied organizations serving their needs and interests worldwide. Do you see ANYTHING about men in there? The closest it gets is u…
/r/MensRights14/01/11 03:59 PM
10

By sticking up for femenism you are sticking up for some pretty lame ass people. If you have some friends that call themselves femenists but are for equality, then I question why they take the time to call themselvse femenists. What are they fighting for? Have you seen that piece of shit, Clerks II? At one point whats-his-face decides that he wants to take the term "porch monkey" back, and make it non offensive again. He doesnt like that it is a racial slur and wants it to be playfull again. Its…
/r/MensRights14/01/11 03:51 PM
9

Unfortunately you are wrong. Pushing to empower one class of people is not fair. The moment women were allowed to vote and join the military they should have kept their noses out of the legal system and government. That was a fair, valid, and fantastic movement towards equality. After those things happened I will let on that there were cultural inequities. Urging bench legislation in favor of women to counterbalance the inequalities in society may have seemed logical, but we know from seeing aff…
/r/MensRights14/01/11 03:31 PM
6

Falsely accusing men of rape is not feminism. Nobody says it is. It is the act of a single person, but the laws that allow it to go unchecked, and even promote it to some degree were put in place by the femenist movement. For example, if a black individual abused affirmative action to take a job from a more qualified white person it's not the fault of civil rights that that individual acted like a prick. It is because of that movement that those concepts were systemized. Men's rights attacks tha…
/r/MensRights14/01/11 03:12 PM
2

I'm trying to decide if I would get upset about a woman taking a dump on a ceramic penis... No... can't say I would give a shit.
/r/MensRights11/01/11 09:09 PM
1

It felt like steve represented a good husband and alexandra represented a bored housewife. I thought the director was saying that alexandra's actions were ok because steve didn't make her happy. After reading some imdb comments I think I may have been off base because I didn't fall for the directors trick. Some people seem to think he made Steve a good guy/father, added in some very light circumstantial evidence as to infedelity, his having lunch with a female co-worker, and then hoped the audie…
/r/MensRights06/01/11 03:19 PM
1

Reading those first two comments pleased me :) thanks for linking this. I hadn't thought of omens comments
/r/MensRights06/01/11 05:08 AM
2

Not in the case if allegory, take the film Antichrist for example. Willam Defoe plays a doctor trying to cure his wife. They are the only two characters in the mike basically. They are credited as "man" and "woman", they, in many interpretations represent to whole of their sexes or perhaps specific aspects of their sexes. At one point willam hides in a hole under a tree, presumed to be a symbol of the tree of life, or a symbol of womanhood. The wife pulls, or delivers willam from this womb under…
/r/MensRights06/01/11 05:01 AM
1

She of course was pointing it at the camera when she filmed. When he watched it appeared to be pointed at him.
/r/MensRights06/01/11 04:37 AM
3

Just thought I would share... jeez =)
/r/MensRights05/01/11 07:51 PM
7

I personally felt really lectured by the movie. Maybe I'm looking into it too much, but with how far the write/director took the plot he seemed to be trying to say something. That something, as I interpret it, is: Be weary of the power you wife wields. It's your job to make her happy, and if you don't she will destroy you. With how empowering her actions are for her I'm tempted to say "shoud destroy you" He is the one with the job and keeps most of the money locked down. This is painted as wrong…
/r/MensRights05/01/11 05:59 PM
3

SPOILER ALERT Act I This introduces Steve, Alex and their two kids. It shows Alex is very troubled about something. It shows Steve being very active and loving towards the children. The only other take-away was references to a security system that the neighbor installed for them. It lets them lower steel gates over the doors/windows. Act II Steve has a birthday party at work, a coworker kisses him on the cheek and he is later seen having lunch with this same co-worker. It's a very very small hin…
/r/MensRights05/01/11 05:00 PM
2

With him masturbating to the video of his wife being fucked while crying. Then one of her johns knocks on the door
/r/MensRights05/01/11 04:44 PM
4

I'm kind of expecting that nobody has seen this movie. My wife and I randomly came across it on Netflix. It's not fantastic but its an interesting ride and a great movie to talk about. In the movie the wife overreacted so much that I couldn't tell if if was sexist against men or women. She is so nuts that it has an underlying wives are crazy kind of message, but I think it much more attacked the dad who has some character flaws but seems to be a mostly good person. This kind of frustrated me as …
/r/MensRights05/01/11 04:21 PM
1

You don't mind debating with your uncle and calling him stupid but all you can do is downvote the people of redit instead of offering counter arguments.
/r/MensRights29/12/10 02:46 PM
-1

Livign up to your screenname i see. Moron. EDIT: I'm living up to mine too I guess...
/r/MensRights28/12/10 07:31 PM
0

What does this have to do with MensRights? Your pessimistic assumption that marriage acts like a binding agent to keep a relationship together, instead of mutual attraction, kids, etc, is ridiculous. Whats more ridiculous is that you think the "sake of children" is a better glue to keep a relationship together. You show your stupiditity in thinking that two people who are mutually imcompatible should stay together for the better of their children. Two sets of happy parents and a chaotic visitati…
/r/MensRights28/12/10 07:24 PM
1

When I first read this I was kind of pissed but I quickly figured out that that thought didn't jive with the way I behave. When women get angry with men for making dish washing or sandwich making jokes; What do you tell a woman with two black eyes, How many women does it take to screw in a light bulb, etc. I get frustrated with them for not being able to take a joke. Same thing with gay jokes, blond jokes, racial jokes, etc. My wife started taking some new calcium supplements this morning. On th…
/r/MensRights27/12/10 05:51 PM
-3

I feel very sorry for you. I'm going to share my opinion and hope I don't get trashed cause 90% of the time I agree with /MensRights. I do think you deserved the charge, and so does she. I also don't think your charge not being fixed is some kind of plot against you. I am upset to hear the police officers didn't seem to respond to her violence until you told them you retaliated. You didn't slap her out of self defense, at least that is what I got from your story. She was wailing on you for hours…
/r/MensRights01/12/10 07:22 PM
10

I wrote your speech for you. "If you select any group of people, even randomly, it stands to reason that you will find certain aptitudes that allow that group to performed a specific tasks better than another group. This of course makes them superior at that one task, but not overall. For women it may be multi-tasking; For men it's delivering clear and compelling arguments in a logical manner while not losing sight of the importance of brevity." Then walk off the stage like a boss.
/r/MensRights19/11/10 07:02 PM
-3

Ok... if a punishment for any crime is relative to the actual crime, and a rapist gets, we'll say, 10 years and the social stigma. Then shouldn't attempting to force that sentence on someone through fraud yield the inverse punishment. It seems like he should get to feed her a drugged pringles sandwich and rape her now.
/r/MensRights01/11/10 07:08 PM
1

Pringles sandwich I was on the phone with my wife talking about what we we're doing tonight. Fuck Cheesecake-Factory. I'm having a Pringles Theta. BBQ Pringles, Pickle Pringles, a medium angus sirloin patty and a dab of mayo.
/r/MensRights01/11/10 07:03 PM
1

When baby's shit with diapers on it goes into all the grooves and wrinkles down there. Girls poo into their vagina and boys get little pieces of poo stuckin their pee hole. It's gross, but its not a reason to go cuttin something off. Personally I would clean doo-doo out of my son's forskin for a few years (he is my step son, his mom had him cut) if it would magically make my foreskin grow back. It's a good trade-off.
/r/MensRights01/11/10 01:49 PM
2

Your right... i forgot cutting off part of someones dick is absolutely comparable to piercing a girls ears or giving them a haircut... It's genital mutilation, and on the basis of custom. It's also not reversable, can cause their penis to bend unnaturally, destroy sensitive tissue, leave scarring on the glans or even render the penis useless. I'm taking a stab from your UN that you are a female. Imagine finding out when you are 15 or 16 that your vagina is supposed to have lips on it, that your …
/r/MensRights30/10/10 02:50 AM
1

HIV was identified and named in the 80's. I have never seen anything showing the origins of it. I'll play devils-advocate for a moment. We aren't perfectly adapted to parts of the earth that haven't changed in hundreds of thousands of years. Evolution isn't random, but it does count on chance to some degree, chance and vast ammounts of time and consisten enviromental pressure. It also has to have transitional states. Argument 1, perhaps we are in a transitional stage right now, our penises are v…
/r/MensRights29/10/10 03:04 PM
-2

Bad argument. Evolution isn't instant. If you take an elephant and put it in the artic it doesnt turn into a mammoth. So it would be nonsense to say that with our relative population increase over the past few thousand years, and the rampant STD's that we may not be in a transitional stage of losing our foreskins. I doubt it, and I agree that circumcision is wrong, but this is a bad bad argument. Try it this way... If we weren't meant to have blind spots in our eyes it would have evolved out of …
/r/MensRights29/10/10 01:32 PM
7

Yeah, like your apendix, blind spot in your eyes, our shitty human knees.... oh wait. I think its wrong to chop it off... but this is just a bad argument. You forgot about transitional stages.
/r/MensRights29/10/10 01:29 PM
8

Hey... maybe you should let your son grow up and have the conversation with him. It is HIS penis after all. I'm not sure what your wife has to do with his penis or future sex life... she doesn't even have one. Now if they were about to cut off your daugters labia, please solicit her opinion. EDIT: by the way, im cut, and I could give a crap what my mothers opinions are on the matter. If I really wanted to be cut I could have done it after I turned 18. I could also give a rats ass if it was easie…
/r/MensRights29/10/10 01:22 PM
2

This: http://classweb.gmu.edu/jkozlows/gendiscr.html It is not discrimination unless you request an equal male only swimming time and they deny you. Also the article has this gem about a girl who felt her changing facilities were not as nice as the male facilities. the dissenting judge would have required further proceedings to whether the difference in the facilities was substantially related to an important objective. If they refused you you would have to establish that the womens privacy was …
/r/MensRights23/09/10 06:13 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter