TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

IStumbled Archive

View 0 posts and 23 comments by IStumbled on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

I’m not exactly sure this is relevant to the Rp Bp debate, but for exemple, most rp I debated thought that there is only two gendre, and that your gender is defined by the sex you have between your legs when you were born. Despite the enormous amount of scientific evidence suggesting otherwise
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/18 06:05 AM
1

Thanks for your answer, will follow up to see where it goes. Shame to discuss those kind of things thru the inferior method of comment posting. Would be so much better to talk
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/18 08:17 PM
2

First link talked about the replication rate for 18 psychology studies. Not nearly enough to draw an "universal" statistic from. And also, psychology isn’t social science. Some tiny part of it are. Social scientist and psychologist disagree all the time about a lot of stuff. And, since the number of studies analysed was so low, there is a good chance that those who couldn’t be replicated had some kind of method flaws. Second link I didn’t understand how it was related to the debate. Maybe I’m a …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/18 08:06 PM
1

ffbtaw posted his links and I can’t respond I don’t know why. So got my response right here: First link talked about the replication rate for 18 psychology studies. Not nearly enough to draw an "universal" statistic from. And also, psychology isn’t social science. Some tiny part of it are. Social scientist and psychologist disagree all the time about a lot of stuff. And, since the number of studies analysed was so low, there is a good chance that those who couldn’t be replicated had some kind of…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/18 07:50 PM
1

First link talked about the replication rate for 18 psychology studies. Not nearly enough to draw an "universal" statistic from. And also, psychology isn’t social science. Some tiny part of it are. Social scientist and psychologist disagree all the time about a lot of stuff. And, since the number of studies analysed was so low, there is a good chance that those who couldn’t be replicated had some kind of method flaws. Second link I didn’t understand how it was related to the debate. Maybe I’m a …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/18 07:49 PM
1

First link talked about the replication rate for 18 psychology studies. Not nearly enough to draw an "universal" statistic from. And also, psychology isn’t social science. Some tiny part of it are. Social scientist and psychologist disagree all the time about a lot of stuff. And, since the number of studies analysed was so low, there is a good chance that those who couldn’t be replicated had some kind of method flaws. Second link I didn’t understand how it was related to the debate. Maybe I’m a …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/18 07:48 PM
1

First link talked about the replication rate for 18 psychology studies. Not nearly enough to draw an "universal" statistic from. And also, psychology isn’t social science. Some tiny part of it are. Social scientist and psychologist disagree all the time about a lot of stuff. And, since the number of studies analysed was so low, there is a good chance that those who couldn’t be replicated had some kind of method flaws. Second link I didn’t understand how it was related to the debate. Maybe I’m a …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/18 07:48 PM
1

First link talked about the replication rate for 18 psychology studies. Not nearly enough to draw an "universal" statistic from. And also, psychology isn’t social science. Some tiny part of it are. Social scientist and psychologist disagree all the time about a lot of stuff. And, since the number of studies analysed was so low, there is a good chance that those who couldn’t be replicated had some kind of method flaws. Second link I didn’t understand how it was related to the debate. Maybe I’m a …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/18 07:48 PM
1

First link talked about the replication rate for 18 psychology studies. Not nearly enough to draw an "universal" statistic from. And also, psychology isn’t social science. Some tiny part of it are. Social scientist and psychologist disagree all the time about a lot of stuff. And, since the number of studies analysed was so low, there is a good chance that those who couldn’t be replicated had some kind of method flaws. Second link I didn’t understand how it was related to the debate. Maybe I’m a …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/18 07:48 PM
2

Come on man, if red pillers read social science, this sub wouldn’t need to exist
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/18 07:09 PM
3

I would love to have a source for this stat (seriously)
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/18 07:07 PM
10

If you push an universalist argument in a debate, and then don’t accept someone calling you out and nuancing it, you are disconnected with reality
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/18 01:39 PM
8

Universalist argument are: Always wrong. Because reality doesn’t care if you think you’ve found out some kind of absolute truth. Reality isn’t absolute. Dangerous. Because they will simplify reality for the people that believe in them, allowing them to become disconnected with certain’s other peoples views of life, making it harder to empathise with them. Fallacious because you can’t argue something that you think is an absolute truths, even if it’s wrong. Just plain fuckin stupid. The world is …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/18 01:11 PM
7

Some people aren’t everyone. Anyone pushing an universalist argument is disconnected with science and rationality
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/18 12:18 PM
14

The problem is RP get addicted to a few scientific facts they consider absolute truths, but then they choose to ignore the majority of modern social science findings, because they are not “hard” enough even when scientific methodology and methods are used than in other scientific fields
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/18 12:16 PM
1

Ok. This is going to be long and painful to write. There is indeed, as you so masterfully observed, global statistical tendencies for men to end up in position of power in the human history. To understand why, we have to go back a long way. To the time where people were still nomads, hunter-gatherer. At this period of history, men occupied very importants roles in tribal society. The most important of them all was to provide for the tribe, defend the pregnant women and their children. (I also wa…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/18 07:38 PM
1

Duh thanks for your smart point. Of course, as everybody knows, man have penis, and woman vagege. Men have more muscle and they lose their hair when they get old. Women have breast to produce milk for their children. Duh. But, if we are talking about the way we interact with each other, or about our general reactions to various stimulations, or about the way our conscience/intellect works, we are more or less the same. Furthermore, empirical statistical behavioural studies cannot be interpreted …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/18 08:36 PM
1

People used to find out about identity issues only when they (the issues) went against social norms. And doing so would provoke huge amount of pain and suffering. People nowadays can choose who they are and no suffering. It’s good right? And even now, things are far from perfect. Were you live has an huge impact and who your parents are matters a lot too.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/18 03:47 PM
1

There is so many things wrong about your answer. First of all: measuring global level of happiness is really difficult, if not impossible. For happiness can’t really be quantified. Growing level of antidepressant user is not representative of the state of global happiness (think about it, a person newly medicated will be "happier" than previously). This growth can be explained in all sorts of manners, but it is principally explainable by the growing awareness about depression and/or other mental…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/18 03:36 PM
2

Roles are irrelevant. Each relationship is it’s own delicate balance, the only thing that matter is people being happy (like you, I’m happy to know you’re happy). The fact that social/religious norms are less powerful now doesn’t mean that everything has become a negotiation, it just means that everyone can find a situation were everyone involved is happy and comfortable
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/18 03:08 PM
4

You need to be medicated. Do you realise that you perceive relationships, who are supposed to be based on love and trust of the other, as something entirely based on power dynamics and control?? You can’t live that way.. men and women are not different animals.. we are the same. Do you realise that you see something so beautiful and unique that (nearly) all humans aspire for it yet so subtle and complex that humans have been revisiting it in countless forms of art for as long as the human race e…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/18 02:53 PM
4

Nothing is a negotiation (except for business). You damn American/neo-liberalist are crazy. Everything is intent, projection, feeling, desire. Go open a fucking book and free yourself from this deep dark place you’re stuck into. Nothing is absolute or universal. That’s how to spot if someone is saying shit AND YOU DON’T NEED SOMEONE TO TELL YOU WHAT YOU ARE SUPPOSED TO DO. YOU CAN FOLLOW YOUR HEART WITH JUST A PINCH OF COMMUN SENSE AND RESPECT FOR OTHERS AND YOU CAN BE HAPPY EDIT: checked my spe…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/18 02:13 PM
3

And you desperate sad male does it all the time with women or people you don’t agree with. Be a man, share the guilt
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/18 02:37 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter