TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ITouchMyselfAtNight Archive

View 1 posts and 116 comments by ITouchMyselfAtNight on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

ITouchMyselfAtNight/r/askTRP14/05/18 02:02 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

That avoids the whole question of consent - the thing this whole thread/post was about.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/18 12:56 AM
1

So no starfish sex then? Even with the wifey?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/18 12:53 AM
1

If one of them is sober...
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/18 12:52 AM
1

This is sort of recursively defining things here. One can accept almost by definition that sexually attractive people, ceteris paribus, will be better in bed than sexually unattractive people. If we were to take our sexually attractive hero and give him third-degree burns, the experience that women would have with him in bed would not be as good, on average. Even if he's the same person using the same techniques, the burns make the experience less pleasurable. What if the lights are off?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/18 11:31 PM
1

So it's not sexist to believe that only men should serve because "men and women have different abilities." But it is sexist that only men 18-25 have to register for the draft. They're both "sexist" and I'm not against either one because I believe men & women have different strengths and they should each play to their strengths - but necessarily be limited to only playing to their strengths (legally speaking). In this particular case, I think only men should be forced into selective service (unle…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/18 12:06 AM
1

I'm saying that women don't see their characteristics as "shortcomings" as defined by TRP men. I'd wager that many women, even if made aware of their hypergamy, wouldn't see it as a shortcoming.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/18 12:04 AM
0

It is a double standard. But so is slut shaming (high n-count?). Both men & women have to deal with double-standard, but because men & women are different GASP, thee double-standards are different for each.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/18 06:09 AM
1

What point? TRP shits on men who haven't swallowed the pill as well (AMALT).
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/18 06:06 AM
4

Do you guy have any stats outside of crime to back up your male oppression meme? I'd start by saying that any oppression that's not legally ingrained is simply societal outlook/cultural norms. The majority of the examples you've made are pretty black & white as far as legality is concerned. They're straight up illegal. And people will always break laws. But let's get back to the legally-ingrained oppression/inequality. Are there laws on the books that specifically discriminate against men? Or sp…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/18 06:00 AM
2

Until there is proof that a country improves with a woman's right to vote, there is no need to entertain the opposite being a possibility. And what objective criteria would that be based on? Would this criteria be applied to the population as a whole? Or only men?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/18 05:48 AM
1

Red pill feed back loops go something like this Act a certain way -> get negative feedback-> respond negatively-> act even worse -> get even worse negative feedback, and so on Alternatively, there's another feedback loop that can happen: Act a certain (TRP) way -> get positive feedback (get laid) -> double-down on the same behaviors -> get laid even more -> validates ALL TRP theory even if only some portion is accurate and other parts are counter-productive because the productive parts happen to…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/18 05:46 AM
1

Well, effectively everything has been invented by men I think the correct response to this is: Every person who was ever born was birthed by a woman Regarding equality: Yea. It's almost as if there were massive societal roadblocks to education and employment for women... If men & women are truly equal, then why couldn't they overcome the roadblocks? Or why did they allow the roadblocks to begin with? Or build their own societies and do the same thing to men? It seems like in western societies, w…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/18 05:02 AM
1

To improve, one needs to be aware of their shortcomings. Or "shortcomings" as perceived by TRP'ers. Since women aren't aware of their "shortcomings" (and first rule of fightclub...), how would they rise above their AWALT? I think that if all women were made aware of their hypergamy and "shortcomings", some may want to change (and others would learn to capitalize on it instead). And some of those would be successful. How many women would fall into that bracket?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/18 04:53 AM
1

That's very idealistic. Unfortunately, many people are all about keeping up with the Joneses - as long as they do better than their peers, many people will prefer that than an absolute improvement for everyone.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/18 04:17 AM
2

On the flip side, what country removed women's rights and became a better place?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/18 04:10 AM
1

producing something of value (writing, art, tinkering, woodworking, etc) Would producing social media material count? increasing your own value (e.g. reading, exercising, learning) is productive. Wouldn't reading fiction (manga?) fall under the reading category yet was trashed on by the original post? How would reading about new software technology help when it comes to women?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/18 02:57 AM
1

The point I was getting at is that as long as both people are approximately at the same level of intoxication, there's no issues, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/18 02:53 AM
1

As someone with no productive hobbies, I'm actually curious.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/18 05:05 AM
1

your MAIN hobbies are video games, comics, anime, etc. So what MAIN hobbies won't make you a man-child?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/18 01:49 AM
2

Drunk men can't consent either, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/18 01:46 AM
1

I am under the (perhaps incorrect?) impression that defamation has to be public. What you're describing is somewhere in the middle. Doing a little more research, if she sends it to people other than yourself, it has the potential to be defamatory IF AND ONLY IF she made a false factual statement. If there's no disclaimer and it states a false fact, then you've potentially got a case. If she qualifies the statement as an opinion/question/disclaimer, you're going to have an uphill battle. Any chan…
/r/askTRP24/06/18 02:50 PM
0

Was this list private? Or publicly posted? Devil's advocate - you're talking to your friend via private message and you tell your friend that some dude is a child molester (he isn't). Your phone gets hacked and the message becomes public. Are you liable for defamation? (Genuinely curious)
/r/askTRP24/06/18 02:29 PM
3

(Anti?)-SLAPP state laws? Really depends which state you're in.
/r/askTRP24/06/18 02:25 PM
1

Don't pimp's/brothels/etc get a large portion of the money? How does that work with your theory? High quality men have the experience to know the difference between a woman who chooses to give her currency away cheaply. Why do/should they care?
/r/MarriedRedPill23/06/18 04:13 AM
1

And a 1/4 chance of a defective gene is absolutely catastrophic compared to the normal chances you have of inheriting such a thing. Sheesh. It sure is compared to normal chances. My point was that it's not an extinction level event.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/18 11:18 PM
1

No, it's extinction-level either way, it just takes longer if you have few men left. More suffering and inbreeding until the end hits. Not necessarily. There's been plenty of bottlenecks before. Btw, inbreeding chances aren't as high as you'd think. A brother & sister having a child only have a 1/4 chance to get a copy of the same defective gene.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/18 01:08 AM
1

Irrelevant, we have plenty of men and women out there. Giving you the historical reasoning here... And bottlenecking the populace down to a few men is absolutely disastrous for genetic diversity. Disastrous but not catastrophic if it was the other way around.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/18 04:41 AM
1

Selective Service can be expanded to include women. A single man can impregnate a multitude of women. But a single women can only bear a single child. So even if the majority of men die, the species/tribe/community/etc continues. Not so if the majority of women die.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/18 03:38 AM
1

Yet the facts do not change, today the bottom 20% of men in the overall values have irrelevant to no chance of getting romance. ... in their current position/status. But they actually do have the power to change their position/status. At least if a society really does equality of opportunity.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/18 12:31 AM
1

I actually find women to be less shallow then men - a man will almost exclusively look at a woman's appearance which can hardly be changed barring plastic surgery or covered up via make-up. An ugly man can still work to become a millionaire, or learn flirting skills, or one of many other things that will attract a woman. Look at Howard Stern - an objectively ugly man. He's drowning in pussy. So the way I see it, the bottom 20% actually have a fighting chance since physical beauty/appearance matt…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/18 01:39 AM
1

It is not an assumption, it is a fact, I live here in Brazil. My grandpa was a full-fledged tribal villager did you not read my post right under this one? I'm not talking about any existing society. I'm saying a truly egalitarian society as such hasn't been done yet. Do you really believe that women would marry or have sex with multiple men and not create conflict? really? Have you never heard of open relationships/marriages? What about a society like this? and even if they did, did you really b…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/18 02:26 AM
1

Based on that description, that would make masturbation boring then?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/18 01:50 AM
1

There's only one way to breath and you've done it so many times that I assume you're bored of breathing then too?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/18 01:48 AM
1

Government of Denmark doesn't think so. Sex is seen as a right in the consociational state, and the Netherlands believes everyone should be able to enjoy.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/18 01:14 AM
1

Denmark already pays for sex workers to service the mentally handicapped
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/18 01:12 AM
1

Government issued prostitutes to the mentally handicapped? It happens already.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/18 01:10 AM
1

That's cause you're under the assumption of 1 man --> many woman. If you refactor that equation to many men <----> many women, then that would truly be an interesting experiment. Equality, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/18 11:12 PM
2

But then I won't have to hear the word like being used every 1 minutes. That alone is worth it.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/18 05:59 AM
1

I guess you can't have certain sicknesses when you're married.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/18 04:27 AM
1

Don't marry sluts ..or you know... be a better lay (and/or/because) you have the biggest dick she's had.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/18 01:32 AM
2

I guess that explains some things.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/18 01:29 AM
1

So as long as my dick is the size of my arm, I'm set? Sweet!
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/18 12:13 AM
1

I consider that kind of weight gain a sickness Since addiction is now a disease, one could say the husband was a sex addict.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/18 03:53 AM
1

What if he quit his job and never did anything but play videogames, eat, sleep & poop?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/18 03:50 AM
0

She cheater on her husband with food.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/18 03:45 AM
1

She said she has lost 50lbs since the start of the year, clearly she is working to fix herself. It's not the same thing. He'll stop cheating on her since the start of the year. Clearly he's working to fix himself.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/18 03:33 AM
1

She made the conscious decision to choose food over husband.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/18 03:31 AM
1

She didn't eat for the purpose of getting fat, while he sought out women for the purpose of cheating. He sought out women for the purpose for having sex with them, not with the purpose of cheating on his wife.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/18 03:22 AM
1

Wasn't it Eve that ruined everything?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/18 11:11 PM
2

Well played, sir. Everyone is DEERing you instead of DAREing you.
/r/TheRedPill09/06/18 02:19 AM
1

shut that down. How exactly?
/r/askMRP20/05/18 07:00 PM
1

What action?
/r/askMRP20/05/18 06:58 PM
1

What if the wife mis-interprets it as you running away from the problem?
/r/MarriedRedPill20/05/18 07:00 AM
1

Why don't these people just move to another country?
/r/askMRP20/05/18 03:44 AM
1

But it means that 60% of the women aren't worth competing for either.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/18 02:40 AM
1

That they should from an early age live their life towards it's one and only goal, children Uhhh... what? Says who? Why?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/18 02:03 AM
1

That sounds like it shouldn't be a relationship to begin with then.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/18 01:16 AM
1

So starfish sex is as good as any other sex then?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/18 11:15 PM
1

Guys usually won't complain if she does all of the same stuff for him, or at least maintains the same enthusiasm I think the problem here isn't so much Chad vs Beta buck but the length of the relationship. Most (any?) relationship that drags past a certain point results on lost enthusiasm, whether it be with Chad or anyone else. Because relationships with Chad never last, many people confuse the issue of LTR vs Chad.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/18 11:12 PM
1

To a point, sure. But not vastly so. If someone wants to have sex 2-3 times a day and the other party wants to have sex 2-3 times a week, it's unlikely they'll find a middle ground that satisfies both. They've done a study where they made couples have sex twice as much as they normally would've preferred. It ended up being counterproductive, with both parties starting to see it as a chore rather than fun times.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/18 05:39 PM
2

Men get married to have children in a 2-parent household. I also see a logical flaw in your reasoning. If the husband slacks on doing what he's been doing before, then perhaps, yes, he can expect less sex. But then if you look at single men - they certainly aren't slacking. They're working their asses off to get sex. I also think a big problem is that men marry women with lower sex drives than themselves. If the wife has a higher sex drive than the husband, it's often the husband that's the caus…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/18 06:48 AM
2

What about raising children in a 2-parent household?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/18 06:42 AM
1

But female virgins aren't clumsy and awkward? What innate sexual skills do female virgins possess that male virgins do not? How do they gain/learn them?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/18 05:30 AM
1

Really? I can't say I've had sex with virgins, but I have had sex with sexually inexperienced woman and ones with experience. I can say without a doubt which ones was better. Is clumsy awkward sex with virgins just a false cliche?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/18 04:50 AM
1

And you never get that lack of responsibility or freedom again I felt more free (but not as fun because I wasn't in an environment with a bunch of people my age) after getting my first job out of college. Yes, I had to pay my own bills. But I also had money to spend on what I want. And I didn't have to take my work home with me like I did in college. The implication being that she doesn't like it but she'll do it for the "right" guy Women will put out more for men they're excited by than otherwi…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/18 04:45 AM
1

By that logic experience is not a positive or negative factor I stand corrected - you're right - if 'that' refers to your previous comment. Let me correct my comment: By that logic, sex with a virgin is just as good as sex with a sexually experienced woman who knows what she wants.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/18 04:35 AM
1

Yes By that logic, sex with virgins is the best sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/18 04:27 AM
1

I guess the best analogy is, why cook your own dinner if there's a ton of restaurants from which you can choose, some of which may already have a chef that makes the exact dishes you were going to cook?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/18 04:26 AM
1

Older people have responsibilities and things tying them down. There are older single people with no children/previous marriages/mortgages, no? There's a reason people look back fondly on college I'd say it's not so much lack of responsibility but first taste of freedom away from parents with a bunch of people your age. You more or less already said "She knows her body." Is the implication here that she learned what she doesn't like sexually with Chad, and therefore not do it anymore? Because th…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/18 04:23 AM
1

Is a reformed slut a prude by definition? I'd think a reformed slut is a prude girl in public but a slut in the bedroom - best of both worlds.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/18 04:18 AM
3

So more sexual experience doesn't equal better sex? Otherwise, why not a virgin? Or do you think there's a plateau at some point after which no gains are made, so it only makes sense to get to the plateau, but no more?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/18 04:16 AM
1

That's the only way you could think up? How else would you determine if your sex drives are compatible/similar? As opposed to one person having a high sex drive, another having a low one? Isn't that like saying how do you know how much/long you'd like to ride a bike if you've never rode a bike?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/18 04:15 AM
2

and only recently is she beginning to recognize all of that after always complaining she was single So once/if she gets through her issues, wouldn't she become a better person worth dating?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/18 12:18 PM
1

Of course people should leave impressions on each other. But leaving an impression isn't the same as molding.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/18 12:16 PM
1

Then we look to meet somewhere in the middle. That means neither partner would be happy. All of which could've been avoided if you had sex before marriage. Seems like a bad trade-off. Or just working out that problem like to people committed to staying together. A novel idea, but i like to believe it has some merit. A lifetime worth of work vs finding out ahead of time by having sex before marriage? Seems like an easy choice. But to each their own.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/18 12:10 PM
1

Sure - but you can't succeed if you don't try.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/18 12:06 PM
1

I guess I'm attractive then. On a more serious note, I always thought that women value confidence. And the fact that you have the balls to approach a woman in an environment where no one really does that (think big city where everyone minds their own business) already gives one a leg up on the competition.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/18 12:05 PM
1

I couldn't care less about drive, brains or beauty as long as I get that peace of mind that only comes when you have no competition. Sounds more like a sex-doll than a human. But to each their own.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/18 11:59 AM
1

Fun, not funny Are you saying that older people are just less fun in general? Cause I personally think that older people may have more $$ so they can have more fun/do certain activities poorer people can't. It also means she did things with Chad that she would never do for you. Why would you think that? Do you have some evidence to back this up? Chad doesn't have to have a career/etc all lined up and he doesn't have to get along with her friends/family etc to qualify, because she's not staying w…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/18 11:55 AM
0

What if you discover that you're sexually incompatible? One of you has a low sex drive, and the other one has a very high sex drive?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/18 11:44 AM
2

The same thing that makes less experienced women more appealing in general. Shittier sex?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/18 11:37 AM
1

You don't think she'll be smarter & wiser with a higher N count and have less drama? And also be more comfortable with her body so sex would be better?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/18 11:33 AM
1

It sounds like a mail-order bride. Also, if she lacks drive, brains & beauty, it sounds like you settled, not her.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/18 01:42 AM
1

How will you know that you've found the best that you can if your selection size is 1? What if you discover that one of you has a high sex drive, the other one has a low sex drive? Or what if you're sexually incompatible for some other reason?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/18 01:39 AM
1

"Give me a woman I can mold and impress easily", it's likely that she'd already share similar opinions and ideas to my own. Then there's no reason for you to mold her if she already shares similar opinions & ideas to your own. However, I can read subtext. It isn't enough that I marry a "free spirit" she has to be allowed to express whatever flight of fancy she conjures up. And I have to support that. Am I right to believe you're implying this? Not at all. For example, I have a very crude sense o…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/18 01:37 AM
1

What if it's from a smaller guy that just doesn't have that dangerous vibe?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/18 01:09 AM
1

As opposed to non-(cold) approaching which fails 100% of the time?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/18 01:02 AM
1

It's possible to be so good looking that you're intimidating. Or you could have resting bitch face.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/18 12:28 AM
3

By not approaching her randomly on the street The woman in the street doesn't run in the same social circles, so there's 0 other opportunities for that man to go for that woman. Also, it does work - if only on occasion and done right (DO NOT INVADE HER PERSONAL SPACE when doing this).
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/18 12:23 AM
2

The most prudish woman I've ever closely known was a divorcee with a history of cheating. Perhaps she didn't know what she was missing out on by getting married as a prude? Inversely the ones with minimal baggage or at least had a solid grasp on it were generally more receptive. I wouldn't say having a history is necessarily damaging, but it frequently is. That's fair.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/18 11:58 PM
1

I would choose to be the richest in my neighborhood. It is kinda my strategy in life. I don't need to be that rich or have that much status as long as I don't have any real competition. I guess I'm different. I don't concern myself with other people so I take the richness in an absolute sense. that has no better option in life other than being my partner So once you teach her all the ropes & she improves enough, she can have better options? Cause I'd prefer someone who tried all their options an…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/18 11:53 PM
1

Right. You don’t need a handbook to teach you that hot people date other hot people. Huh? The hottest people did NOT date the hottest people. They dated people within their group, where selection was quite limited.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/18 11:48 PM
2

Youngest OK funnest I'd say older people tend to be funnier as they've had more time to perfect their craft. Just look at established comics vs open mic night. most sexually adventurous I'd say that comes with being comfortable with their body & knowing what they want. Based on your reasoning, virgins would be the most sexually adventurous. when she hasn't had as many dicks, he doesn't have to deal with her bullshit What exact bullshit are you referring to? or even pay for the "access" the same …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/18 11:47 PM
1

I was under the impression we're talking about (immutable) biology instead of man's laws which change with time & location.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/18 11:44 PM
1

Of course divorce is sometimes warranted. I'm just saying there are other considerations besides the relationship itself (like kids).
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/18 11:42 PM
1

Is the problem that women with life experience aren't impressed by you? Perhaps that's the issue?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/18 11:41 PM
1

Sounds like you want a child, not a woman. Does someone with their own opinions, ideas & experiences threaten you? Why don't voters vote for politicians who promise to do whatever the polls tell them? Instead, we vote for politicians whose existing ideas are closest to what we want. I think I'm in good company.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/18 11:40 PM
1

When a man, say, changes the burned-out lightbulb over the basement stairs without being asked There's plenty of men who don't see the burned out lightbulb in the basement as an issue until... they actually need to do something in the basement.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/18 03:56 PM
1

I'm new to this reddit. Can you point me in the right direction?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/18 03:34 AM
2

Would you prefer to be rich in the absolute sense even if your neighbors were richer? Or would you prefer to be the richest in your neighborhood, even if you're poorer in the absolute sense? Same question, but now in relation with women: a woman (former slut) that can give you certain qualities that would beat the qualities of an inexperienced youngster in absolute terms (but not necessarily the best qualities she ever gave to her previous partners) vs the younger inexperienced drama-filled youn…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/18 03:32 AM
3

I know what you mean. But in reality, if she's had multiple partners, it's unlikely that any one partner got the best of everything. Some got the best A, others got the best B, etc. So what's the issue of being on approximate equal footing as any of the previous partners? Especially if the absolute value of those 'bests' is higher from someone with some life experience ?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/18 03:14 AM
1

It's okay for your eyes/body to wander but not hers A man can impregnate multiple women. A woman can only choose a single male.* *Devil's advocate
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/18 03:06 AM
1

Staying married means you are purple Or you have kids that you want to raise in a 2-parent home, no?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/18 02:59 AM
2

Anything her previous partners got, I want. Awkward starfish sex? Petty drama?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/18 02:36 AM
2

But it's more due to the fact... Anything to back up the italics part?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/18 02:35 AM
3

Chad is getting her best... What is her best? Are there some quantifiable 'best' characteristics that you can point out?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/18 01:53 AM
1

Black people dated black people, Indians dated Indians, whites dated whites, etc. Jocks still dated within their race, but hung-out with others from their team.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/18 01:52 AM
2

Youth IS her best. For what? My understanding that ideal child-bearing age peaks at 25. And dealing with women under 25 is a drama-fest that I want to steer clear of. Age comes with baggage and less beauty. I agree with less beauty. But baggage can also be wisdom. I'd rather have an experienced 30-year old be the mother of my children than a no-nothing 19 year old.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/18 01:50 AM
1

Is it possible they never found a quality man that stuck around before?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/18 01:36 AM
3

Why do you think in most religions men are promised a "harem of virgins." Why do you think men pay millions of dollars for a woman's "virginity." As a man, I never understood that. Sex with older, more experienced women was always better than with younger, hotter, & more inexperienced women.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/18 01:15 AM
2

Besides youth, why do you think a woman won't giver her best to her later partners? As an example, I've always noticed that older (more experienced?) women tend to be better in bed. One could say the later partner is actually getting more.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/18 01:11 AM
2

What is considered best? Are there some quantifiable characteristics that you can point out?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/18 12:51 AM
1

A mixed-race school where people only hung out & dated with their racial clicks except sport teams & stoners.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/18 12:41 AM
1

I could see how it's quite useful/helpful, but i'm on the fence about dread game - and definitely questioning spinning plates. Would you go as far as suggest spinning plates to your dad?
/r/askTRP14/05/18 02:13 AM
2

So what about the Tom girls, the ones that can hang out with the boys. If a girl can hang out with a group of guys and she's even mildly attractive, you can bet your ass that half the group wants her (and not just for sex). And if she does end up in a relationship with one of them, it usually lasts.
/r/RedPillWomen28/06/13 03:57 AM
113

If a girl asks me to buy a drink, I ask her if she has any better pickup lines, that one is getting old.
/r/MensRights15/02/11 05:54 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter