I_Conquer Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
4	Why did this die so quickly? Agreed. Also... I mean I assume there’s a subset. But how do we know it’s the “same women”? That’s almost certainly false. Most people, including most women, can’t possibly care. Even among those who know who both Cosby and Cardio B are, only a small percentage can possibly have the time and inclination to offer anything more than a passing glance. Finally - even if drugging were comparable to drugging and raping (which it isn’t), if you really want to compare Cardi to Cosby, wouldn’t you need t…	/r/PussyPassDenied	14/04/20 10:58 AM
1	He has a very special name Peak Fonze?	/r/PussyPassDenied	05/12/19 04:32 AM
3	Found on another page. (ah-ah-ah!)	/r/PussyPassDenied	06/08/17 02:09 AM
2	How the media reports female child rapists. I guess that if one is inclined to make an issue out of everything, then yes, that can be an issue. Some of us prefer to live in a world where most people are doing the best they can with what they've got. In that world, it's understandable that a writer or journalist might hectically jot off a 'think piece' to earn a few bucks in the midst of a million other things and, without intent or issue, defer to a few cultural biases and then, after that having been pointed out to them, edit their piece…	/r/MensRights	18/01/17 11:06 PM
7	How the media reports female child rapists. It also says in the update at the bottom of the page: Update: This piece is based on the language and storyline directly from police investigations. Nowhere does the writer show support for someone who committed statutory rape. Language has been added to the piece to make it abundantly clear that Vera was in the wrong, and that it is the overwhelming opinion of reasonable people that those defending her are incorrect.	/r/MensRights	18/01/17 08:50 PM
1	You keep using that word... I do not think it means what you think it means This man in Utah charges 'Liberals' more for smoothies than 'Conservatives'. It's a similar crazy attitude.	/r/MensRights	29/10/13 11:49 AM
18	You keep using that word... I do not think it means what you think it means That's what she said.	/r/MensRights	29/10/13 11:45 AM
1	After-birth abortion: why should the baby live? -- Journal of Medical Ethics (Found this disturbing) You may be correct that it is a modest proposal (I can't say that I know one way or the other), but I think you may want to tighten the authors' thesis: that killing a foetus and killing a newborn are morally equivalent given the assumption that 'costs (social, psychological, economic) for the potential parents are good enough reasons for having an abortion even when the fetus is healthy,' or based on the perceived viability of the child. It seems to me this is an important qualifier, because it…	/r/MensRights	02/03/12 04:41 AM
7	Falsely Accused and Suspended from College without Evidence, Based Solely on the Accuser's word Depends on your goal. Do this if you want to 'improve' the system and are willing to lose your time and money to the cause. Martyrs still die you know.	/r/MensRights	12/01/12 05:12 PM
3	Imagine this were a fat, ugly female instead. There would be outrage Sitcom? Decade?	/r/MensRights	24/05/11 03:19 PM
1	My first time in/MensRights: Observations. You didn't make a point. You made a poor analogy. It doesn't stand. It's lame. Whether my argument is lame or lamer is irrelevant. Why is it irrelevant? Because I agree with you that TheBananaKing makes a good point, but I disagree that your lame analogy is better than Titus1980's response. And since you're representing my side of the argument here, it's better for me to get rid of arguments like yours. Since I haven't entered the argument among Titus1980 and TheBananaKing, my ability to reason …	/r/MensRights	05/10/10 10:24 PM
1	My first time in/MensRights: Observations. Comparing unintended conception to an unintended car accident is not a good metaphor. All those endorphines dispensed as a result of orgasm are your body's way of thanking you and rewarding you for attempting to pass along your genes. The fact that you have other plans is of no consequence to the reward centres of your brain. You are not rewarded for a car accident. It's a poor analogy, an unfair way to think about sexuality, and adds nothing to the central argument. So it should be pruned.	/r/MensRights	04/10/10 09:27 PM
3	My first time in/MensRights: Observations. Oh come now. If there is a purpose to sex, it's babies. It's possible that we don't even really have "baby drives" - just sex drives (and most of us know how difficult it is to curb those). Reproduction is the most important function of sex. The same cannot be said of a car accident. We can add all sorts of meaning and reasons for sex. It's fun. It's awesome. It has health benefits. It's exercise. It's great. Yadda Yadda Yadda. I get it. And I'm with you. But the fact remains that on a fundament…	/r/MensRights	01/10/10 09:24 PM