TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

I_LikeToReddit Archive

View 0 posts and 128 comments by I_LikeToReddit on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

https://cactusjaq.files.wordpress.com/2013/11/ric-flair-woo-gif.gif?w=549
/r/PussyPassDenied18/12/17 04:57 AM
4

It's not the kiss, it's the obvious lack of consent.
/r/MensRights22/11/17 01:01 PM
-1

And I might take exception to someone responsible for hundreds of preventable deaths doing it.
/r/MensRights22/11/17 01:00 PM
2

And I might take exception to someone responsible for hundreds of preventable deaths doing it.
/r/MensRights22/11/17 12:59 PM
1

A guy working for me has run into this. His ex gets free legal so she just runs up tens of thousands of dollars of expenses for him, hoping to bankrupt him to the point he gives up.
/r/MensRights03/09/17 03:47 AM
3

My wife stayed home with all our kids until they were school aged. It was definitely a financial hit, but it was something that was important to us both.
/r/MensRights03/09/17 03:12 AM
1

It's already one of the accepted though lesser used definitions. It is just context dependant.
/r/MensRights29/05/17 03:20 AM
1

Well fuck the philosophers, I like it so I'm using it!
/r/MensRights29/05/17 03:17 AM
7

Personally I prefer humanist to express this.
/r/MensRights28/05/17 11:59 PM
1

I've also got 4 sons in scouting. They think it's fine. Insisting on the separation of boys and girls doesn't really seem to be such a thing anymore. In small communities if we didn't put them together we wouldn't have enough people.
/r/MensRights05/05/17 08:52 PM
1

In Canada there is not nearly the degree of gender separation as in the US. Boys and girls are used to being together. Hell, in 1992 I joined the military and I did my basic training in open barracks with no rooms one bathroom and one set of showers. My platoon started and ended 1/3 female and 2/3 male. The puritanical streak regarding sexual morality that you see in the US isn't so much of a thing in Canada. I suspect it's partially because the Scouts are so secular.
/r/MensRights05/05/17 02:27 AM
1

Well some are fairly secular in Canada. My brother in laws husband is a scout leader in France. I can't imagine that more than 15-20% of US troops would stand for that.
/r/MensRights05/05/17 02:21 AM
1

Well I taught 16 courses on the army and I had 5 kids go through scouting across the country, so I think it's at least some substantial experience.
/r/MensRights04/05/17 09:53 PM
1

I've been out with the scouts and trained a lot of young troops. It has been my experience that having women/girls present tends to curb the general young male stupidity. May be a Canadian cultural difference though.
/r/MensRights04/05/17 09:47 PM
1

My kids are all actually doing this right now. Seriously, what's the big deal.
/r/MensRights04/05/17 09:28 PM
3

That's for older kids
/r/MensRights04/05/17 09:26 PM
1

We just have scouts. We're not as bent out of shape by religion or sexual orientation either.
/r/MensRights04/05/17 09:26 PM
1

Do you really want your daughter/son alone with the opposite gender for a week with minimal parental supervision and about 10 other guys? sure
/r/MensRights04/05/17 09:25 PM
1

Not always, but for a hell of a long time though. I'm in my 40's and t5hey weren't allowed when I was young and in scouts.
/r/MensRights04/05/17 09:23 PM
2

My daughter attended about 2 meetings with the girls and decided they were lame and wanted to go do scout stuff.
/r/MensRights04/05/17 09:23 PM
1

They've had that for decades in Canada
/r/MensRights04/05/17 09:22 PM
16

Because that majority of the parent volunteers (mothers) lack the knowledge or interest to do so.
/r/MensRights04/05/17 09:21 PM
2

It really depends on the focus that the leaders set in a lot of groups.
/r/MensRights04/05/17 09:20 PM
-1

Meh, I'm not that bothered by it. My daughter is in scouts because she thinks that guides are lame. Can't say I disagree. It also makes sense to integrate them in smaller towns where there aren't enough kids to support both.
/r/MensRights04/05/17 09:18 PM
21

Look where the teacher turns around, who do you think got punished?
/r/PussyPassDenied17/04/17 07:52 PM
1

Probably the company bought them bulk
/r/MensRights13/04/17 11:05 PM
2

They're not all white though. https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Ci7V02mXIAAs3eN.jpg:large
/r/MensRights13/04/17 11:01 PM
1

And they have found solutions for equality using language. In France they use male terms to refer t everyone and in Quebec they have male and female terms for everything, even if that doesn't exist in France.
/r/MensRights03/04/17 02:23 AM
1

I'd even go so far as saying that using "they" for the multitude of other genders is a reasonable and acceptable solution. When I have to learn 30 new made up pronouns, well that's where I draw the line.
/r/MensRights03/04/17 02:21 AM
3

This is not uncommon in the military as well, especially in training environments.
/r/MensRights03/04/17 02:19 AM
7

/r/forwardsfromgrandma material
/r/MensRights03/04/17 02:18 AM
3

The assumption that 1 in 1000 level IQ is required or even advantageous for a STEM career is an incorrect premise. IQ's above 130 or 2 standard deviations are actually more likely to result in someone being excluded from the field. By dividing the distribution function of the elite professions' IQ by that of the general population, we can calculate the relative probability that a person of any given IQ will enter and remain in an intellectually elite profession. We find that the probability incr…
/r/MensRights02/04/17 01:25 AM
5

I've gone to war with female soldiers. Not many mind you. I'd rather have gone with the ones I did than some of the males I was saddled with. By the time we made out way through work up training a lot of people, male and female, who didn't belong there fell by the wayside. If you keep the standards and hold people to doing their job, the ones that can will, the ones that can't, well, they'll go b clerks, sigs and supply techs or whatever. Every woman I deployed with could meet the standard. Some…
/r/PussyPassDenied04/03/17 04:57 PM
12

Considering the muted reaction there and in Norway and the fact most countries have allowed women in every military trade for years (27 of them in the case of Canada) I think this may just be another example of American exceptionalism.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/03/17 08:59 PM
28

This is not particularly out of the ordinary, it's simply equality under law.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/03/17 08:13 PM
3

That's kind of adorable.
/r/MensRights23/01/17 01:07 PM
18

This has been done. The results were predictable. https://www.reddit.com/r/videos/comments/3cswfp/in_one_season_of_the_dutch_version_of_survivor/ http://www.returnofkings.com/32053/this-accidental-experiment-shows-the-superiority-of-patriarchy
/r/PussyPass05/01/17 12:46 AM
1

These aren't the facts you're looking for.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/12/16 10:32 AM
1

That's a really fantastic video.
/r/MensRights13/12/16 11:54 PM
1

CBC has started using it in both plural and singular for transgender etc people. Honestly I think it's a better solution and I suspect in the fullness of time the one that will catch on.
/r/MensRights13/12/16 09:09 PM
2

Well I will admit to being something of a language purist. I find it interesting that the gender pronoun debate isn't even an issue in other languages. I certainly think that referring to someone as he/she/they as they prefer is entirely reasonable. But using 28 or 30 different ones, or adopting one made up by a small minority is counterproductive and distracts from the main issues. Should something else come into common usage in the future it would of course be expected to change. We went from …
/r/MensRights13/12/16 07:49 PM
2

My son liked his sister's toy baby stroller. He put his trucks and dinosaurs in it and pushed them around.
/r/MensRights13/12/16 03:28 PM
1

And awesome. Seriously playing with Legos again is a big benefit of having kids.
/r/MensRights13/12/16 03:27 PM
3

Also my thoughts on the matter.
/r/MensRights13/12/16 03:05 PM
15

So.... what's wrong with "they"?
/r/MensRights13/12/16 02:33 PM
1

In Canada women have been allowed in every trade for 25 years. Less than 1% of infantry are female. The ones that can cut it will make it, the ones that can't won't. The few that think they can make it let 'em try. I predict similar results in the US.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/12/16 05:01 AM
2

Meh, little kids are like that. My daughter would dress like a princess all day, then go put on jeans and a Spiderman t-shirt when her brothers were coming home from school to be a boy and play trucks with them. My littlest son also decided he was a puppy at one point.
/r/MensRights19/11/16 03:01 AM
13

Well, there's 14 seconds of my life I'll never get back
/r/PussyPassDenied19/10/16 06:46 AM
1

Or breaking a pint glass and gouging faces with it.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/09/16 01:46 AM
1

I find the British line up in an orderly fashion and wait their turn.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/09/16 01:45 AM
1

Well if you give it to them they will all become ungodly sluts /s
/r/MensRights14/09/16 01:17 AM
3

for hair cancer go to /r/Justfuckmyshitup
/r/MensRights14/09/16 01:16 AM
3

would actually SAVE the government 8-28 million dollars Yeah but not during this fiscal year...
/r/MensRights14/09/16 01:14 AM
1

All things being equal the person to report it first is more likely to be believed.
/r/MensRights06/09/16 03:31 AM
3

No-one wants a world filled with whores. https://67.media.tumblr.com/4c5cf474d19a70b6e67340dc0ad38c6f/tumblr_nhtpseUUz61s3h43ko1_r1_400.gif
/r/MensRights06/09/16 03:24 AM
3

Then pancakes means stop. Always have a safe word.
/r/MensRights06/09/16 03:21 AM
-1

Bosnia was hardly a rousing success. And the US had a limited and rather late participation in it.
/r/MensRights06/09/16 03:14 AM
1

I make sure I have another preferably female NCO present in similar circumstances.
/r/MensRights06/09/16 03:05 AM
1

Well like I said it's a bit complex as everything is linked these days. I can tell when my wife has been using my computer because the ads start to show up in French instead of English.
/r/MensRights05/09/16 06:37 AM
0

Or you just didn't go on YouTube that particular week? Well I don't even watch TV anymore, just Youtube and a couple others mostly. It's not just Youtube. Your accounts are often linked across various services, platforms and devices, and some sites store a lot of data. Try logging in and out of various accounts, using different devices or repeating the same searches, logged out from a different location. You'll be seeing different results. Have a watch of this for an overview of how it works. ht…
/r/MensRights04/09/16 08:21 PM
1

Well, Canadian media outlets aren't. At least the young offenders act is good for that.
/r/MensRights04/09/16 05:44 PM
2

with one in two marriages ending up in divorce--there is a risk of one parent alienating their children against the second parent. That's just one of those stats that people repeat without really looking into it. That stat is from the 1980s. In reality divorce rates have been falling steadily for nearly 40 years. http://www.nytimes.com/2014/12/02/upshot/the-divorce-surge-is-over-but-the-myth-lives-on.html http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/divorce-rates-lowest-40-years-6887383 http://www.huffi…
/r/MensRights04/09/16 05:41 PM
1

To be fair, it is a better idea to go out for drinks with friends regardless of who you are.
/r/MensRights04/09/16 05:32 PM
5

My wife had the first child at 27 and the last at 38. Having a child at 38 was much harder on her physically than at 27. At 27 she was ready to walk home from the hospital 4 hours after giving birth because she didn't want to stay there anymore. Not so much at 38. I don't think this is any secret to women who have had children.
/r/MensRights04/09/16 05:16 PM
1

Or you know a system where people can pay in and then receive a portion of their pay while taking a couple of months of maternity leave, without worrying about being fired. Then maybe some affordable child care options, and the ability to make catch-up contributions to a pension fund if they want following a return to work. It is possible to offer reasonable supports like this to families without causing undue hardship, expense an disruption to business. Personally I took about 6 weeks of parent…
/r/MensRights04/09/16 05:12 PM
1

This actually raises a few relevant points. Losing a pregnancy can be really devastating for a couple. Yet for some reason people don't want to talk about it or just brush it off when they do. My wife had a miscarriage the first time she got pregnant and it was really devastating to us. I can't imagine the heartache of someone going through 3 or 5 or 7 of them.
/r/MensRights04/09/16 05:08 PM
3

You should thank your lucky stars that there are good community-minded folk out there watching out for this kind of thing within their communities. I'm glad I live in a small community where most people know each other.
/r/MensRights04/09/16 05:01 PM
0

was so preoccupied by not wanting to cause a scene... #CanadianProblems
/r/MensRights04/09/16 04:57 PM
2

Fuck these autistic leftists who can't distinguish between child molesters and average, everyday males going about their day. Maybe it would be nice when you felt marginalized to not mock other socially marginalized groups like people with autism.
/r/MensRights04/09/16 04:56 PM
0

And I never saw those videos. So obviously it is somehow tailoring my ad content differently from the ad content you see.
/r/MensRights04/09/16 04:52 PM
2

The ads you see on youtube are partially based on what kind of videos you watch and what kind of searches you do. My kids who speak French have started using my computer for example and I am starting to gets ads in French.
/r/MensRights04/09/16 04:15 PM
1

Have you heard of filter bubbles? Online search engines filter their results to show what they think each individual user wants to see. https://www.ted.com/talks/eli_pariser_beware_online_filter_bubbles?language=en
/r/MensRights04/09/16 04:07 PM
2

The application of title 9 has really jumped the shark recently so I think that it's becoming rather obvious.
/r/MensRights28/08/16 05:23 PM
20

Well, women have the right in many places. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Topfreedom#United_States
/r/MensRights28/08/16 05:21 PM
-3

Or maybe people could just not be assholes, but maybe I'm in the wrong sub for that
/r/MensRights15/08/16 03:04 AM
-6

This is some weapons grade autism Hi, I'm autistic. Could you consider using a different phrase to describe how stupid it is? http://www.thesaurus.com/
/r/MensRights15/08/16 12:07 AM
1

I too was wondering about that.
/r/MensRights14/08/16 01:06 AM
1

It has a lot to do with modern training methods as much as the increasing deadliness of the battlefield.
/r/MensRights18/07/16 07:14 PM
1

And all that being said, look at armies where this has actually happened. Women have been allowed in the infantry for decades in Canada for example, but make up less than 1% of the infantry soldiers. The truth of the matter is that a vanishingly small number of women actually want to be in the infantry and are physically and mentally capable of it.
/r/MensRights18/07/16 07:05 PM
1

It's evolution. A hold over from when we were living in the stone age that makes us think this way; when doing so had reproductive advantages.
/r/MensRights18/07/16 06:26 PM
1

Generally because the having one X chromosome tends to average it out less as compared to having 2 X chromosomes.
/r/MensRights18/07/16 06:12 PM
1

There's a lot of worry that allowing women into the combat arms will render them ineffective. In Canada women have been allowed in the infantry for decades. Yet in all that time the proportion of women in the infantry has been below 1%. Equality of opportunity isn't the same as equality of results.
/r/MensRights18/07/16 06:09 PM
1

Happily married for decades with a large family.
/r/MensRights18/07/16 05:43 PM
1

Rather a cynical view of marriage that
/r/MensRights03/07/16 02:06 PM
0

No they have to do with her being her
/r/MensRights03/07/16 07:15 AM
3

Generally, it is women only who get that choice; as Farrell has said, women have the choice to work full-time, work part-time, or stay at home; men have the choice to work full-time, work full-time, or work full-time. I think that this is something that you can decide as a couple, but I'm in a stable marriage, so I may be a minority on here. That's obviously not equal rights, but will not change soon Parents having a choice to pursue a career or be a adopt a traditional role and be a parent at h…
/r/MensRights03/07/16 04:04 AM
2

Well she is an immigrant who doesn't speak English well, with an education and qualifications that don't transfer. If I moved to the country she is from I'm pretty sure she would be making 5x as much money as I could make.
/r/MensRights03/07/16 03:56 AM
5

i thought they were fighting for women's rights to work? I thought they were fighting for equality under the law. Silly me.
/r/MensRights03/07/16 03:55 AM
2

I assume if the woman in the couple makes more money it would make sense for some couples. Being a stay at home dad is a hard choice to make as a lot of people won't respect it, but in the end it's about what's best for your kids.
/r/MensRights03/07/16 03:54 AM
-1

Because she is an immigrant with qualifications that don't transfer to Canada, She doesn't know how to use computers and she doesn't speak English very well.
/r/MensRights03/07/16 03:53 AM
-1

That's not a reason. Sorry I guess you didn't feel like you needed to be present in the lives of your preschool children. that's your choice, respect the choices of others if you want the same.
/r/MensRights03/07/16 03:51 AM
1

There is a wage gap that can't currently be explained or identified, but it's only 3-5% in most studies I've seen where things like experience, seniority and education are taken into account. The problem is that so much of the number crunching they do has an obvious agenda that they won't look into this actual real gaop as it isn't politically expedient.
/r/MensRights02/07/16 06:16 PM
-6

Add in kids, and that ratio skyrockets in favour of women. This is a luxury choice women get to make (and that white knights willingly hand them - no offense) that men largely do not have available to them. It's simply a financial and biological choice. There is no way my wife could earn the salary that I do, and spending 10 months breastfeeding children kind of limits what you can do. You have more patience than I do, clearly. Once my kids have hit school full time, I'd be looking for her to co…
/r/MensRights02/07/16 06:12 PM
5

Pregnancy – something we both wanted – diverted you to the most important job in the world. This is an interesting piece. My wife too stayed out of the workforce for 15 years to raise our children. It was a sacrifice, we didn't have as nice a house, or the vacations, toys etc that we might have wanted but for us and our family it was a valid choice and what we valued as a couple. There are far to many people on both sides who don't see how a woman choosing to be a stay at home mom while her husb…
/r/MensRights02/07/16 05:47 PM
1

It happened at an airport. At airports there is a lot of security and they are very quick to stop any kind of altercation.
/r/MensRights08/06/16 01:30 AM
2

Well, children stop being cute when they constantly throw tantrums, throw food, color on your floors, and chase the cat around. If you actually raise them instead of playing Farmville constantly there's a bit less of that. If I have to run the show for the evening, the kid eats in 30 min or doesnt get fed. Bathtime is 15 minute tops. 1 cartoon, 1 book, and 3 songs and to bed. Leaves me plenty of time to do the dishes and straighten up before 10:00. I dont fuck around and he knows it. He also kno…
/r/MensRights01/03/16 06:26 AM
1

Because kids are awesome. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xtEKNoam8Dg
/r/MensRights01/03/16 06:24 AM
2

It is impossible to have a basic middle-class lifestyle without 2 spouses working unless one is earning over 150G Or you live in a rural area and are very frugal.
/r/MensRights01/03/16 06:20 AM
4

The drywall lift is money well spent.
/r/MensRights01/03/16 06:16 AM
1

You're probably not a dragon then. /r/dragonsfuckingcars
/r/MensRights23/02/16 09:12 PM
1

relevant
/r/MensRights23/02/16 09:09 PM
1

Those where my rules for spooning in the field for "warmth". Spooning isn't gay below -30
/r/MensRights23/02/16 09:06 PM
1

Canadian army, being on the hockey team is worth 5 points towards promotion.
/r/MensRights23/02/16 09:05 PM
1

In my limited experience - 9 years in the Marines - I found the military to be dramatically more inclusive than the civilian world. 25+ years Canadian Forces. This is an accurate assessment.
/r/MensRights23/02/16 09:04 PM
27

Now, now, as we saw in the Ghomeshi case the court of public opinion is always right. /s
/r/MensRights23/02/16 08:56 PM
1

You're not getting it. You're paying into it yourself. You're not paying them to have kids. You're taking a libertarian position that is just as unrealistic as communism. It doesn't work in the real world.
/r/MensRights17/02/16 07:34 AM
1

More of a safety net, it, it's a 60% wage replacement. The thing is you aren't eligible for it if you haven't paid into it for a certain time, about a year, and what you get back in benefits is dependant on what you put into it. A doctor is going to be getting much more out than a 7-11 clerk. Also it's the system that pays you part of your salary if you suffer an illness or injury that prevents you from working, and you don't have any other coverage. There are a lot of checks and balances in the…
/r/MensRights17/02/16 05:22 AM
1

Depends what industry you work in and where you live really.
/r/MensRights17/02/16 05:02 AM
1

The money can be used to replace income in case of job loss, for parental leave and for some job retraining and apprenticeship programs.
/r/MensRights16/02/16 12:33 PM
1

I have compassion for people in dire straights, but at no time during the day do I think that the work I just did should be considered a "freebie" from me because everyone with a kid is more entitled to some of my labor. You do realize the system is set up to actually return to them part of their own labour right?
/r/MensRights16/02/16 04:18 AM
1

It's not an income tax, it's a separate fund, not general revenue. To be able to access it you need to pay into it. and wouldn't the fact that people payed into it themselves not encourage them to take advantage of the program?
/r/MensRights16/02/16 04:02 AM
1

Can't you join in a lot of cases when you are under 18? But you cannot be deployed until you are older? They've closed up a lot of the loopholes that allowed it to happen. I.e. Isn't the top level of boy scouts basically army training? http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-kM4sn8ZR_FY/UXnkeI_wqsI/AAAAAAAAAGo/aAQE5Tojz9k/s1600/implied-facepalm.jpg
/r/MensRights16/02/16 03:38 AM
2

one would expand selective service for women (but was proposed tongue-in-cheek, I don't think in the end that it will be. The reason is that women are excluded is: "[t]he existence of the combat restrictions clearly indicates the basis for Congress' decision to exempt women from registration. The purpose of registration was to prepare for a draft of combat troops. Since women are excluded from combat, Congress concluded that they would not be needed in the event of a draft, and therefore decided…
/r/MensRights16/02/16 03:29 AM
1

being a soldier Who let's not go crazy now, I really liked being able to take parental leave.
/r/MensRights16/02/16 03:21 AM
1

Giving fathers as much time off as women will probably just cause men to either start making up for it in other ways or giving up and becoming MGTOW. I took time off when my kids were born. My wife was breastfeeding and pumping milk. She couldn't make milk if she was woken up at night. So I stayed up nights with the babies for a few weeks until they get settled and fed them expressed milk. It was great.
/r/MensRights16/02/16 03:20 AM
4

There is legislation forthcoming to end women's exemption to selective service. I say let that legislation take its course.
/r/MensRights16/02/16 02:46 AM
1

Campus police that they want people to report it to on the other hand...
/r/MensRights16/02/16 02:42 AM
4

Hell I joined the army when I was 16. There are still a lot of young people that have their head screwed on straight these days.
/r/MensRights16/02/16 02:41 AM
1

It's vanishingly few people who actually take the time to sit down and read and understand the charter these days. Which is a pity as it is a rather short and concise document.
/r/MensRights16/02/16 02:25 AM
1

When you say it is from "the State", you really mean you want people like me who don't have anything to do with you to pay you a salary to stay home because you decided to have a baby. No. You have workers pay Employment Insuarance premiums. Then after a certain amount of time doing so they are entitled to draw benefits if they lose their job, or if they have a child. The "state" doesn't pay it as such, it comes from a pool of money generated through premiums paid by people earning wages from a …
/r/MensRights16/02/16 02:21 AM
1

Or they could do like Canada does and simply pay for it with Employment Insurance premiums that employees pay.
/r/MensRights16/02/16 02:18 AM
4

And even 4-6 weeks of parental leave until the new baby is settled and sleeping through the night makes life less of a living nightmare for all involved.
/r/MensRights16/02/16 02:16 AM
4

why should any employer pay a woman or man for having a baby? Indeed why should they. This is why in Canada the pay that employees receive while on parental/maternity leave comes from the Employment Insurance premiums they pay. They're essentially using their own money that they in into the program in premiums. So why shouldn't they be able to use it? Many employers choose to supplement these benefits as a way of retaining skilled employees though.
/r/MensRights16/02/16 02:14 AM
1

A lot of men in the military actually use parental leave. The wife either is a stay at home mom, takes an unpaid leave of absence or leaves her job on having the baby.
/r/MensRights16/02/16 02:11 AM
3

link?
/r/MensRights14/02/16 01:31 AM
-3

Literally at no point in history have women been at a fundamental disadvantage in terms of dating. Yes, because at no point in history were women exchanged for cattle to cement family alliances.
/r/MensRights13/02/16 05:39 PM
1

He bounced back from Moxy Fruvous so it's entirely possible. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ylaLG-DdT7E
/r/MensRights13/02/16 03:15 PM
1

That's just well written Canadian English.
/r/MensRights13/02/16 03:13 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter