TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

I_TOW_U_TOW_MG Archive

View 2 posts and 102 comments by I_TOW_U_TOW_MG on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
30

I_TOW_U_TOW_MG/r/MGTOW28/11/17 03:33 PM
26

I_TOW_U_TOW_MG/r/MGTOW06/04/18 08:33 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
74

Where does she get her intergenerational data? It seems more likely that decades ago when a family man was cheated by his wife, he'd do the wife in. It could also be that women today are nothing to fight over for. People used to fight and die over cattle, too, but now we get our milk at the store.
/r/MGTOW05/07/18 09:05 AM
23

This is akin to the other female classic I've noticed over the years that seems to be universal across women: locking a man out. I could swear they get some instinctive kick out of doing that. Don't cohabitate, don't share finances.
/r/MGTOW05/07/18 09:01 AM
2

This presumes, obviously, that men have a desire for sex that is essentially uncontrollable. Why the presumptuousness? Open the first search result for gender differences in sexual desire: Across many different studies and measures, men have been shown to have more frequent and more intense sexual desires than women, as reflected in spontaneous thoughts about sex, frequency and variety of sexual fantasies, desired frequency of intercourse, desired number of partners, masturbation, liking for var…
/r/MGTOW05/07/18 08:38 AM
2

Dear diary, today Nancy at work told other cashiers that I have split hairs. Critiquing women's appearance is a part of patriarchy, I feel so oppressed right now. I should be paid reparations for being a woman.
/r/MGTOW30/06/18 07:04 AM
1

We're in a social climate right now where men have to go through so much shit, and if they want to take a machete and rape a girl every now and then, all the power to them. They literally made everything, I think they should get a pass sometimes lol Good stuff.
/r/MGTOW30/06/18 07:01 AM
1

Doesn't she? Clearly, she understands the value of her body, which will diminish with each year and might make her unable to sell it for very much by the time she's in her mid-20s. She hasn't the brains to get t(her)e shit together herself, and by the time she's old enough to know grammar, she will have developed depression and anxiety, started taking antidepressants, gained weight, and become a miserable bitch, a old hag who accomplished nothing in life besides serving as a piece of meat for a …
/r/MGTOW29/06/18 07:22 AM
3

I know what you're thinking of but I mean the Indonesian plant variety that doesn't mess with hormones.
/r/MGTOW28/06/18 03:44 PM
3

Don't forget: neurologists only find consistent differences in male and female brains because historically most neurologists have been white males, hence neurosexists.
/r/MGTOW28/06/18 08:29 AM
2

Complaining about white feminists and how their oppression is compounded because they are female and black. Really interesting stuff that doesn't get tedious after a few paragraphs at all.
/r/MGTOW28/06/18 08:15 AM
1

Women know this. OP is trying to get them to "see the irony", which they most definitely don't want to do. It is also the case that hypergamy comes with female nature as liking titties comes with males. Finding a rich husband who takes care of everything is every woman's dream since childhood, lasting long after they've become practically unfuckable. It's not something they can change, whether they see the irony or not. What they can change, though, is women's position in society, i.e. taking ov…
/r/MGTOW28/06/18 07:52 AM
1

Thanks, Melissa. Remember, the best thank you gifts are the ones you can eat. You should also write female if you really want to pull it off.
/r/MGTOW28/06/18 07:44 AM
8

The male baby pill can't get here soon enough. Popping one half an hour before intercourse and getting sperm enzymes shut off would be ideal. Human trials are currently going on. Another thing we need is the right to forego paternal rights. You have clearly expressed your will not to have children and the woman doesn't want to get an abortion? That's her choice, but you should not be held accountable for her decision.
/r/MGTOW28/06/18 07:35 AM
7

You should go your own way because you might not want to get married or want a kid but when you get tangled up with the opposite sex they'll pressure you into "committing" and try to get pregnant to trap you because nature programmed women to want to get pregnant. When you mess around with women there's always a chance that you'll get trapped.
/r/MGTOW26/06/18 11:18 AM
1

This is my exact experience as well. When I started uni years ago I had picked a research subject months beforehand and excitedly asked everyone what they were interested in. Not many were as keen to zero in on something as I was, but in due time guys found their niche and I had a lot of interesting conversations with them. Girls? I learned not to bother asking them since I never got an interesting answer. You're interested in fashion? Kewl. I'mma go talk to this guy who can ramble about the his…
/r/MGTOW26/06/18 09:13 AM
1

It's not a well-known thing, but Bacopa monnieri the nootropic plant that's used for memory enhancement actually boosts your neurotransmitter levels and, at least in my case, takes away the lust for female flesh. It's cheap as shit, and I'd advise looking for raw organic powder instead of standardized extracts sold online because the latter is a powerful laxative. Take a teaspoon of raw organic powder in hot water a day or mix it in your coffee in the morning. You'll still be able to pleasure yo…
/r/MGTOW26/06/18 08:33 AM
1

Some highlights from The Manipulated Man
/r/MGTOW26/06/18 08:14 AM
12

I'm a smoker. I've had a few people ask me for a smoke when I'm doing it in public. When it's a guy, it's usually someone I've seen before, i.e. living in the same area. In my experience, guys ask you for a smoke if they know that you'll recognize them, i.e. would be more willing to share your smokes and exchange a few words about the bad habit. Women, on the other hand, approach me like I owe them a smoke, despite being complete strangers I've never seen before. I've come to enjoy saying "no" t…
/r/MGTOW26/06/18 08:09 AM
3

The title is correct. It makes supreme sense when you consider what Ester Vilar wrote: "only women exist in a woman's world". I think that's because they're so superficial and appearance-oriented that they only pay attention to beautiful people, who in most cases happen to be women.
/r/MGTOW23/06/18 07:38 AM
2

Let's be honest here. Everyone knows what genders are involved because no woman would give her ATM card to her husband for him to go shopping and take his friends out. I'm willing to bet that this scenario of a generous well-to-do wife and a social fly shopaholic husband has never occurred in the history of humankind.
/r/MGTOW23/06/18 07:29 AM
2

I grew up believing that. Countless men do. That's why the Matrix pill metaphor works so well. It involves a realization that you've been lied to, and the harsh reality of female nature sets in. I read the Manipulated Man when I was 20 and didn't get what it was saying. Fast forward some years and experiences with women, and I'm unable to refute Vilar on anything, her diagnosis is perfect.
/r/MGTOW22/06/18 08:16 AM
2

The tautology in "it's going to smell and taste like PUSSY" is nice. At least it's acknowledging that female genitalia is disgusting.
/r/MGTOW21/06/18 10:35 AM
3

Yeah, fuck being interested in things and looking for unique ways to better the world. Feminists wondering why women make such a minuscule contribution to various fields of expertise - is it sexist discrimination or is it due to the majority of women sharing this exact sentiment of fuck everything that requires effort and knowledge of what you're doing.
/r/MGTOW21/06/18 10:04 AM
1

Yeah, nah. The findings suggest that, when watching videos that induce an emotional response, men often have more intense emotional experiences, whereas women have higher emotional expressivity, particularly for negative emotions. Picked a random example because this is the scientific consensus. Men have deeper emotional lives and ability to empathize with positive emotions, women are more expressive and particularly responsive to negative emotions. Also, look at the size of the amygdalae. The p…
/r/MGTOW21/06/18 09:35 AM
2

I was just recently thinking of the "everything men can do, women can do better", which is such a blatant bluff but true if genders reversed. Is there anything, besides giving birth, that women do better than men?
/r/MGTOW21/06/18 09:30 AM
1

The sheer amount of stories like this should be a lesson to young men even considering the trap that is marriage.
/r/MGTOW21/06/18 09:21 AM
3

Do they? Hot and young women don't have to do shit to be considered sexually attractive. Around these parts beautiful girls who know they're really pretty only bother with makeup for events. The overwhelming majority can't compete without making their face a canvas to be washed off before going to bed. They are upset, though, because it's in a woman's nature to be upset. At everything. How many happy, self-confident, and emotionally satisfied women do you know? Have there ever been any? I don't …
/r/MGTOW20/06/18 11:36 AM
2

That's a solid video. Really good dissection of a special case of hamstering.
/r/MGTOW15/06/18 12:57 PM
3

I'm too scared. I don't want it to get lost or like get stolen or something, so... I'm not wearing my ring. When we're in public I take it off and have my secret that only you guys will know which is a lot of people. She's scared attractive men won't approach her if she's wearing her ring. She still has the ring on her, making it equally likely to get stolen, and on a chain, making it more likely to get lost. I like how her eyes widen when she utters the words "public" and "secret" because she's…
/r/MGTOW15/06/18 10:32 AM
2

Always.
/r/MGTOW15/06/18 09:38 AM
2

Now that's what I call projecting.
/r/MGTOW15/06/18 09:17 AM
1

He's assuming that only 17% of Wikipedia biographies are about women because of the editors' gender (hence, sexism) and not because there are fewer notable women (the sad true state of things). Behind every great man is an unremarkable woman. What are they going to do? Write inane entries about every notable man's mother, sister, wife, and baby mamas? Maybe the vast majority of Wikipedia editors are men because women generally, both historically and at this very moment, are not very much interes…
/r/MGTOW13/06/18 11:06 AM
1

Do you mean the way colleges and universities are increasingly, overwhelmingly female and the quality of academic publishing has gone to shit? Or how lectures are turned into discussion groups because female educators are lazy, don't have a good enough grasp of their subject matter and would rather just sit in on students shooting shit? I can't count how many times I've started wondering, some few pages into a paper, why it's complete tripe, to scroll up and realize that it was written by a woma…
/r/MGTOW13/06/18 10:05 AM
2

Here's some amateurish neurology. The part of the brain responsible for emotions is called the amygdala. It's shaped like an almond and there's one in each hemisphere. Women are more "in tune" with their emotions, the neurological explanation goes, because they process emotions more on the left side of their brain, where language centers are located. That's why women can *talk* about their emotions, also why they cling more to negative emotions and consequently have a lot more anxiety and depres…
/r/MGTOW01/06/18 10:43 AM
4

As the theory goes, all women have a mild form of hybristophilia. The word itself means sexual attraction to serial killers, but all women look for strength, tallness, stature, etc. in a man so that *they* could use the man, as a tool, for self-empowerment. So that she'd have a big man to come protect her and exact violence on her command. This goes hand-in-hand with the instinct of "I can change him", which is found in the letters women write to convicted serial killers.
/r/MGTOW01/06/18 10:06 AM
6

*and* catch the flu.
/r/MGTOW01/06/18 09:24 AM
6

When I was young I used to think girls were joking or being cutesy when they "exaggerated" their mental problems. Life has taught me that when a woman starts, even in a cutesy tone, confessing all the ways she's fucked up, you better listen. And run.
/r/MGTOW01/06/18 08:43 AM
2

Reminds me of some song lyrics: >Though I empathize with 'em and sympathize with 'em >I don't enterprise with 'em or synchronize with 'em >We don't strategize with 'em, we're not allies with 'em >We don't fratenize with 'em, let 'em patronize >We don't want no ties with 'em, we won't monopolize with 'em >Let 'em ostracize, we don't compromise with 'em
/r/MGTOW01/06/18 08:23 AM
2

I have to disagree. Accusing feminism of this makes it a cultural thing. I believe it is neurological. Think of it like this. Gay men are male hardware operating with female software, which is why gay men are flamboyant, vain, bitchy, nasty, etc. but a bit more reasonable than women because the hardware is better (larger brain, for example). Lesbian women, on the other hand, are operating male software on female hardware. They're more likely to take up metalworking and driving a motorbike. They'…
/r/MGTOW01/06/18 08:11 AM
3

>Men find dating and serious LTR’s to be a major pain in the ass and burden. That is correct.
/r/MGTOW01/06/18 07:57 AM
1

If I catch my man cheating on me I'm pulling him aside and asking him where did I as a WOMAN go wrong to make him decide to cheat, and asking him how I can IMPROVE to be his QUEEN so he wouldn't wanna cheat again. I didn't step up so he cheated, can't blame anybody but myself.
/r/MGTOW01/06/18 07:39 AM
0

Fuck Yahoo, man, all those cookies to see the news content and then another set from Twitter to see video. When I finally saw the dreaded video it just looked like the girl didn't know what to do in front of camera. It is easy enough to read relationship awkwardness into that but it just looks like she's camera shy.
/r/MGTOW27/05/18 08:17 AM
-1

This is a brilliant analogy Is it? The game theory incel, seeming to identify as an incel, self-describes the position of self-pity and frustration ("Why can't I win the game?"). On the chart, incels are said to be more "activist" than PUAs. Either activism here means working for the good of mankind like MRA's, in which case there should be more theory-building incels out there, or it means something else, as in, there should have been another designation standing for "activism". In what sense a…
/r/MGTOW24/05/18 08:30 AM
35

Rudy Giuliani says on Fox News, "Who cares about men?" defending Ivanka Trump and dismissing Jared Kushner. No one bats an eye. It is common knowledge that no-one cares about men. Israeli's winning Eurovision song is supposed to be inspired by #metoo and contains the words "you stupid boy", as if it were young boys in powerful positions exploiting various industries for poon. Everyone sings along. It's fashionable to rag on the male sex. It's called gynocentrism. Both men and women get pissed if…
/r/MGTOW19/05/18 09:53 AM
2

For whatever reason, it's really easy to imagine that. I think I've seen women act like that IRL.
/r/MGTOW18/05/18 08:24 AM
2

Search "gender differences in emotional processing". There's even a Wikipedia article on this subject. The keyword is amygdala, since that's where the differences are most pronounced (e.g. this paper).
/r/MGTOW16/05/18 06:38 PM
1

It's even worse. Neurologically, both and men and women react negatively when a woman suffers or gets hurt, but women react positively when a man does. That's why "ending violence against women" is a thing and violence against men humorous.
/r/MGTOW14/05/18 08:43 AM
5

I think the author is completely off. Her reasoning makes no sense for men. Men don't prefer the company of other men because their little feelings might get hurt if judgy women were around. They seek all-male company because it's just much more pleasant. That historian guy on youtube answered this question with a poignant observation. They had a re-enactment and one bloke brought his girlfriend along and ruined what could have been an awesome evening. Were the reasons she ruined the evening bec…
/r/MGTOW14/05/18 07:52 AM
2

"She thought in blanks, as girls do, and some women" - a perfect literary encapsulation of female thinking. One of the surprising things about science is that early hunches and anecdotal evidence can turn out to be completely valid. I used to think that it was a sexist gender stereotype that men think critically/logically and women "feel" things. By now there's so much neurological evidence that only an ignorant feeler could deny that it's the case.
/r/MGTOW14/05/18 07:36 AM
1

behavior that doesn't allow men to "be weak" or show any emotion There's neurological evidence that men are "not in touch with their emotions" like women because men process emotions on the right side of the brain, away from the language centers. She's betting that it's society and conditioning that makes men they way they are. Moreover, this goes along with the thinking that the female pattern in superior: being weak, frequently breaking down into crying, having statistically enormous amounts o…
/r/MGTOW07/05/18 08:10 AM
1

That is correct. Every bad thing she ever does can be wiped from her conscience with "look what you made me do".
/r/MGTOW07/05/18 07:42 AM
1

That's because men are evaluated based upon their ambition, status, earning potential, etc. e.g. their future. The pity party about terrible past is really there to make you not realize that you're dealing with damaged goods; it's attempting to turn a flaw into a virtue.
/r/MGTOW07/05/18 07:39 AM
3

The citations in humanities and social sciences will forever be dominated by men since the overwhelming majority of what female academics write is glorified navel-gazing.
/r/MGTOW07/05/18 07:30 AM
1

When we promote online harassment, we're inspiring.
/r/MGTOW28/03/18 08:37 AM
1

That makes a lot of sense. One version I've heard is that men's brains compute from front to back, while women have a more developed corpus callosum, the connective tissue between the hemispheres.
/r/MGTOW25/03/18 11:52 AM
1

I was just thinking of this. Mattress Girl was a very good illustration: a vindictive bitch decides to ruin a man who got tired of her and moved on, and then she convinces a few of her female friends to accuse him, too.
/r/MGTOW25/03/18 11:41 AM
1

It's a memerino.
/r/MGTOW25/03/18 11:34 AM
3

Where it might be heading is towards internet censorship and making the exposing of female nature as MGTOW define it a hate crime. Obviously the red pill makes one rage and hate, this is a natural. The problem is defining it as a "crime". Who are the victims of men telling their real-life stories? One chink in the MGTOW-accusation armor I've noticed is that they can't deny that it's empirical, that these views, which many hold extreme, are based on what any man can and probably has already exper…
/r/MGTOW08/12/17 09:59 AM
15

The place is run by psychopathic industrialist Niander Wallace, played in cubist spasms of actorly evil by Jared Leto in milky cataract contact lenses. Despite Leto's gnawing portrayal (he chews his minimalist wooden scenery like a robo-beaver unto pulp and damnation) and the mesmerizingly expensive post-apocalyptic mis-en-scène, the new Blade Runner offers very little to connect with in the way of human drama. I give up. Can't stand female writing of this sort. It's reminiscent of 50 Shades of …
/r/MGTOW08/12/17 09:01 AM
1

Well that is fucked. The girl fucked it up by making an unfunny rape joke at a very inappropriate time. The guy fucked up by sticking his dick in crazy. She probably liked the dicking but women are notoriously bad at handling rejection and don't really consider the consequences of their actions. I looks like those backlash-fearing articles are right, written by women who know the female psyche: #metoo reminded a lot of women what power they have and now the dumber ones are throwing around false …
/r/MGTOW07/12/17 10:02 PM
1

[A real man] will give without expectations. Because he is a tool.
/r/MGTOW07/12/17 08:22 PM
6

I recently had two similarly structured experiences when entering my building and seeing people entering the elevator/lift. 2 guys were in, noticed me coming, and pressed the button for doors to re-open 2 girls were in the lift but both were looking at the mirror in the lift, didn't notice me It was cartoonish: guys were looking out for those around, girls were so self-obsessed they couldn't be bothered.
/r/MGTOW07/12/17 08:07 PM
7

Eshter Vilar made the comparison of women with businesses in this regard. She also explained that women don't feel jealousy the way men do because first of all they're callous creatures who don't feel as deeply and secondly because when you go to another woman you're still in the business and useful for women collectively.
/r/MGTOW07/12/17 07:42 PM
1

Stop projecting. I found the clip funny, and know about female indecisiveness from personal experience. It is simply off-topic and feeding into the stereotype of men's rights advocates as plain women-haters.
/r/MensRights07/12/17 03:56 PM
2

I went looking for it and found a thread on the againstmensrights sub. I love how this comment drips of feminist neuroticism: Facebook protects white men because its run entirely by white men, for the benefit of white men to explicitly oppress women, LGBT and minorities. Use of these communication tools faciliates white men to coordinate their oppression and glorify their systemic rape culture. I haven't been on Facebook for years and have stopped associating with anyone who uses Facebook, Twitt…
/r/MGTOW07/12/17 03:45 PM
1

But it gets worse, because there are a minority of guys out there who see porn as almost a direct replacement for casual hookups, and even a very small few who straight up genuinely prefer porn to casual hookups. There's one step further. The reason men "get" porn and women don't is neurological - we have a greater response to visual sexual stimuli. Recall and tie this with the tid-bit about spacial reasoning - men drive around knowing where they are, women drive on paths with memorable landmark…
/r/MGTOW07/12/17 12:47 PM
1

Think about it. The insult of not having a dick really amounts to saying you're a woman. They're literally putting down themselves with these kinds of insults.
/r/MGTOW07/12/17 12:11 PM
1

Nah. This is a real problem. The reason that Vice article could claim that all of these subreddits share a DNA is because they kinda do. I noticed this recently when spending a hangover day browsing through pussypassdenied - it's a very specific thing when a woman's claim to female privilege is denied, but a lot of posts just glorify women getting beaten or post stuff that would better suit some other sub. The problem is, these subs take pleasure in gendered Schadenfreunde but veer off topic by …
/r/MensRights07/12/17 11:43 AM
1

Went to look for a definition of psycho- or sociopathy and came across this sweet comment on reddit: The only thing worse is when I have completely neurotypical teenage patients who are completely convinced they're ruthless psychopaths because they don't make friends easily and are a tad awkward. Basically what this film seems to be.
/r/MGTOW04/12/17 11:08 AM
1

Barbarossa has a good video on this. He speculates that hybristophilia is a spectrum and the evolutionary reason women want to "fix" so-called bad guys is to wield their physical power for self-protection.
/r/MGTOW04/12/17 10:24 AM
1

So she fears that women will be feared for their power to destroy men's lives and shut out of important things. What she isn't afraid, but what I think can happen, is that men get the message that sexual harassment is really really bad and will start taking female harassment much more seriously, as per the recent thread where a school principal asked for advice her for getting lewd messages from young female teachers hoping to get favors from him in the committee that decides raises. She should …
/r/MGTOW04/12/17 09:54 AM
2

Mice Pence is apparently buddhist.
/r/MGTOW04/12/17 09:37 AM
1

I think there's something very relevant here for understanding the female mind. Eshter Vilar wrote that women are not as intelligent as men because they have no valid need to compete, which in her opinion is what begets intelligence - you have to outsmart someone else to get smarter yourself. By this token, women generally might as well lack this motivation because they aren't required to compete, don't really take to competition (let's form an in-group and pick on people collectively rather tha…
/r/MGTOW04/12/17 09:29 AM
1

Chances This sent me looking for statistics, with 3.7% being the current average consensus, but this varies greatly with nation and socioeconomics so for example Mexico boasts 11%, one in fucking ten. Some fathers’-rights groups in Australia have called for mandatory paternity testing of all children at birth, with or without the mother’s consent or even her knowledge. Before this is implemented there's no way of knowing how real the chances actually are.
/r/MGTOW04/12/17 01:37 AM
1

It did get her a lot of attention all over the world even by people who don't really watch documentaries. It got her on Ted Talks. It got you to share it. It got us discussing it. I really think she just wet her index finger, caught which way the wind was blowing and made a switcheroo that was promised to get her a lot of publicity. I'm similarly still a bit on the fence on whether Eshter Vilar was being honest and sincere or if The Manipulated Man was originally meant as a satire - because some…
/r/MGTOW02/12/17 02:06 AM
1

It was a general estimation of her project. She may have good intentions but somehow I'm unable to shake the feeling that it's all very self-serving. Just look up her previous documentaries. The first was about little girls ritualistically marrying their fathers as abstinence pledges and the second about gay family adoption. She's out to push these sex-related buttons and I guess finally found a wind of moral outrage that can carry her farther than anything else.
/r/MGTOW02/12/17 01:12 AM
2

That monolithic enemy argument is indeed pure high-grade bovine fecal matter. MGTOW also oppose feminists, traditionalists, arguably even pick-up artists. Also, there's a semantic problem to be had with the word "enemy". Is it really a fight when one side is refusing to take part of the proceedings? A war without battles is what that is. It's like Barbarossa said: MGTOW is a non-violent social movement but they are going to attempt paint it as a "violent" thing through guilt by association and a…
/r/MGTOW01/12/17 11:55 PM
1

I don't like that she goes about it like a narcissist. She's the type of documentary maker who makes everything about herself, how she understood the issues, how they impacted her, etc. This goes for her previous documentary films also but with this one she really inserted herself into it, But then again I guess it helped her get it through her thick skull and her pretty face maybe will make some other women listen up and get the point of mens rights instead of the knee-jerk feminist reaction of…
/r/MGTOW01/12/17 11:37 PM
8

Rape is a type of sexual assault usually involving sexual intercourse or other forms of sexual penetration carried out against a person without that person's consent. (Wikipedia) This implies a central aspect of legal personhood: the capacity to decide whether to consent to or refuse sex, and to have that decision upheld by the law. (Mirror) Actually a moral debate going on right now. Surely going to bite some women in the ass when their butler-bot programmed with human male sexual preferences s…
/r/MGTOW01/12/17 11:13 PM
2

I'm facing the same dilemma, and knowing about the chameleon effect makes it really hard to swallow the fact that my gf has a habit of parroting my own ideas back to me, which either amounts to her piss poor attempt to manipulate me or is a shallow veil for her own lack of intelligence and independent thought. But I think it's possible to manage a healthy relationship with a woman when going your own way. The name of the movement (and I'd contest that it is a movement, though it's framed more li…
/r/MGTOW01/12/17 10:52 PM
1

And the connection with mens rights? If you don't want Vice and others designating this sub as "women haters", just don't post things that are anti-women in a sub that's supposed to be about men's rights!
/r/MensRights01/12/17 07:12 PM
1

The shortest summary of what it does.
/r/MGTOW01/12/17 04:22 PM
5

This may be an odd suggestion, with long exposition to boot, but I was pretty banged up after my last long-term relationship so I know a suggestion like "improve or work on yourself" won't be the solution because you may do so with the idea in mind that if you do improve yourself you may get her back. You won't. I think the true reason why men so often commit suicide after divorce and women don't give a fuck (or, rather, just give it to the next guy) is that they are, as Eshter Vilar put it, cal…
/r/MGTOW01/12/17 03:42 PM
10

Sure, why not. But parenting itself sucks. Currently reading Lawrence Shannon's The Predatory Female and one of the things that makes all too much sense is that women are biologically programmed to want to have children, but not all that keen on actually raising children (hence occurrences like this). I now suspect that men don't want to have kids, but when they do they may discover that they want to raise a well adjusted human being, as evidenced by the amount of men who complain over losing cu…
/r/MGTOW01/12/17 03:24 PM
3

There's no need to change tactics. The tactics have worked effectively for some 100,000 years. The chameleon tactic in the acquiring stage works well enough - many women have nothing against pretending to be anti-feminist, appreciating the strength and honesty of a man going his own way, etc. and still succeed in pulling these men into their traps. You can't change the game on someone not playing the game.
/r/MGTOW01/12/17 02:27 PM
1

The statement in the title is acceptable - appearances can be deceptive, after all - though I think you're confusing MGTOW with anti-feminists. As to the body text, "essentially" is a nice weasel word but it's plainly obvious that MGTOW are not out there waging a cultural war like SJW's are. We've checked out from that shit.
/r/MGTOW01/12/17 01:19 PM
1

I think it's a MGTOW film but the maker can't really say that out loud because that would get it labeled as hate speech or whatever. He said the date scenes were based on his actual experiences with women, in which I have no doubt because they align completely with red pill tenets (i.e. reality instead of wish-fulfillment).
/r/MGTOW01/12/17 11:54 AM
4

Just saw Newly Single at a local movie festival. An indie film with a lot of filler, but about the current Tinder dating scene. The main character is a film maker (lazy film making but whatever) who goes on a lot of dates and never finds fulfillment in women. The creators were present at the showing and the only woman involved with the making of it explained that she was surprised that her friends gave her an obviously "misogynistic" script but she tried her best to make it more tolerable for wo…
/r/MGTOW01/12/17 11:32 AM
1

In image form: She has a name. He has an occupation.
/r/MGTOW01/12/17 11:08 AM
4

It must be at least half joking in some sense or other because it cannot be taken seriously. At least the part about no men in the world. That would mean the end of our species.
/r/MGTOW30/11/17 06:03 PM
11

I think it's half joking, but not in the sense that it's humorous but in the sense that it is classical feminine childishness. The upside is that women give a fuck about men who are equally as fake as them - e.g. the guy who works out, takes care of his body, even applies moderate make-up, etc. I don't think women don't give a fuck about men. I think they're just shallow and only give a fuck about attractive people.
/r/MGTOW30/11/17 05:54 PM
2

quite far from the norm I don't think it is. What you consider the norm is merely the Western European marriage pattern, i.e. marrying comparatively late (mid 20s) with a small age different between the spouses. This is opposed to the earlier Mediterranean pattern, for example, where people lived in extended families and girls going through puberty (12-15) were married into the family, basically to increase the labor force of the extended household. There have always been 10-20% unmarried people…
/r/MGTOW29/11/17 08:25 PM
1

I don't think this is the case. I think you're projecting what you've learned from the pill unto her. It seems more likely that woman in that situation will start to rationalize how it must be social conditioning that makes men attracted to young fit babes, so they can retain some hope that this situation can be altered with enough social pressure. Just take a look at this poor attempt to do so. Ever wonder why the best looking guys out there always seem to date the skinny “hot chicks”? Because …
/r/MGTOW29/11/17 07:27 PM
1

He coined the term. This saddens me. I perused the book and it's full of inanities, inexact and roundabout thinking. Though it's not all bad and might merit a thorough read. For my entire adult life, the women I have known have been, without exception, selfish, self-centered and, in fact, word, and deed: self-obsessed. Over time, my initial generosity and tolerance have been all used up by the women who have used, exploited, and burned me in order to pursue their own personal short-term gratific…
/r/MGTOW29/11/17 12:33 PM
2

Ah! I finally got a perfect rejoinder for whenever a girl utters that she wants a man who is significantly taller than her.
/r/MGTOW29/11/17 04:10 AM
7

I think there's an even bigger threat to women in future artificial companions than just the accessible orifice. It's that general artificial intelligence could offer men the intellectual stimulation women are so often incapable of providing. Instead of your partner just nodding or regurgitating what you've just said, you could actually hold an intellectual exchange with a thing that looks beautiful, acts nice, and on top of that could actually inform you of something you've never thought of. Ho…
/r/MGTOW29/11/17 03:54 AM
1

The safest is this: "only women exist in a woman's world" (p. 22). This is pretty much undeniable. Vilar goes into how this operates in sexual dynamics, for example: "A woman would be bored to tears with an all-male harem." (p. 26). Personally, I find in it broader implications: A desirable man for a women is a man who is desired by other women. That's pretty much what the appeal of status is for them. If another woman finds something in a man, surely that man has something. It is more popularly…
/r/MGTOW29/11/17 02:29 AM
2

[...] whereas man keeps a wife and children with his income, she works for herself alone: she would never use the money she earns to finance the life of a beautiful young man. (p. 156) The "woman with a family" - the woman who supports a healthy man and his children all her life - is practically unknown in the professional world (p. 174) From The Manipulated Man (1972) by Eshter Vilar.
/r/MGTOW29/11/17 02:10 AM
1

I agree fully. Even if some parts of it are a bit of a stretch (e.g. the parts about religion, which no longer hold true), I believe this is a key piece in our modern intellectual history. It is also kinda funny that the currently growing movement to let go of women can be traced back to a woman who dared to key us in to how women really think of men. But I have to say her insight into how women don't really care about men is surprisingly insightful even today. It's also a testament to her verac…
/r/MGTOW28/11/17 05:24 PM
3

As I understand it, she wrote this back when "Women's Liberation" had gone on for some two decades (her own estimation). By now her estimations are even more solidified. Her analysis of feminism - one of the last chapters is about how the American man is most manipulated, and how women's liberation could only have begun in the U.S.A. - is especially relevant. She basically says that Simone de Beauvoir parroted Freud, Marx, and Kant in her The Second Sex, i.e. made the way manipulated men view wo…
/r/MGTOW28/11/17 05:19 PM
3

Same. When I first read it many years ago I didn't find it all that appealing because I was too young and didn't have all that many experiences with women. By now I recognize that most of what she writes is spot on. Barring, perhaps, her thoughts about pornography, which I think stems more from male desire than female manipulation. But she was ahead of her time even on the subject of artificial wombs, predicting that such a thing might exist in a few generations. In hindsight it is almost scary …
/r/MGTOW28/11/17 05:06 PM
1

It is ironic that men consider ordinary prostitutes so very contemptible - they are among the few women who frankly admit that they make money by renting out a specific orifice of their bodies. [...] Women, too, despise the common prostitute, but for a different reason: they despise her for her stupidity. A woman who sells her body so ineptly is shockingly stupid by female intelligence standards. (Vilar 1972: 82)
/r/MGTOW28/11/17 04:07 PM
2

He assumes her feelings are aroused to a considerable extent and even judges the degree of feeling by the quantity of liquid shed. This is obviously a mistaken interpretation. Women really are callous creatures - mainly because it is to their disadvantage to feel deeply. Feelings might seduce them into choosing a man who is of no use to them, i.e., a man whom they could not manipulate at will. (Vilar 1972: 74)
/r/MGTOW28/11/17 03:57 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter