| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | My theorie about how to avoid Divorce: "Have at least 3 children" Why? Because she will subconsciously know she will never be able to handle that many children on her own. (+ a Statistic)Humans only got married for economic reasons, not love. That's not correct. Why do we feel sexual attraction and love? Because from a purely evolutionary perspective, these things urge us to go in the right direction. Why does sex feel good? Because it makes us breed. Marriage was just the way that makes attraction between couples socially acceptable. If a guy knocked up a girl, there would be the stereotypical father with a shotgun that would urge him to marry his daugher to not sully her honor… | /r/TheRedPill | 04/05/19 06:25 PM |
| 1 | My theorie about how to avoid Divorce: "Have at least 3 children" Why? Because she will subconsciously know she will never be able to handle that many children on her own. (+ a Statistic)Exactly. How can anyone think that somehow humans have gotten so bad at relationships in the last 50 years, compared to all of human history before? How is what is happening right now not a consequence of our culture and society? | /r/TheRedPill | 04/05/19 06:08 PM |
| 1 | My theorie about how to avoid Divorce: "Have at least 3 children" Why? Because she will subconsciously know she will never be able to handle that many children on her own. (+ a Statistic)100 years ago? So the 1920s? Flapper girls, and the birth of women's lib? The aftermath of WW1? Yes, I meant the time before WW1. WW1 was kinda the catalyst for a lot of bad things happening. I think you might need to spend some time reading the history books about that time period, because you clearly have no clue what the hell you are talking about. And what you said is supposed to disprove what exactly? You are confused. lol | /r/TheRedPill | 04/05/19 02:44 PM |
| 1 | My theorie about how to avoid Divorce: "Have at least 3 children" Why? Because she will subconsciously know she will never be able to handle that many children on her own. (+ a Statistic)Based on what I know it seems like they have sex once or twice of year out of necessity or something. I never understood that. How can people tolerate that. Does she like scream at the husband, when he touches her? Why doesn't he try harder? | /r/TheRedPill | 04/05/19 02:27 PM |
| 1 | My theorie about how to avoid Divorce: "Have at least 3 children" Why? Because she will subconsciously know she will never be able to handle that many children on her own. (+ a Statistic)Well I would have had better advice, but like 15 years ago they made martial rape a thing. | /r/TheRedPill | 04/05/19 02:24 PM |
| 1 | My theorie about how to avoid Divorce: "Have at least 3 children" Why? Because she will subconsciously know she will never be able to handle that many children on her own. (+ a Statistic)So you think half of the marriages in western civilization are bad ones? Because half of all marriages get divorced. I somehow doubt this is the natural state of humanity. I doubt 100 years ago we divorced half of all marriages. | /r/TheRedPill | 04/05/19 02:23 PM |
| 1 | My theorie about how to avoid Divorce: "Have at least 3 children" Why? Because she will subconsciously know she will never be able to handle that many children on her own. (+ a Statistic)Oh sorry. I actually missed that detail. My bad. Well you know. It was just a theory, bro. Maybe the ex needed to have 5 kids. lol | /r/TheRedPill | 04/05/19 02:21 PM |
| 1 | My theorie about how to avoid Divorce: "Have at least 3 children" Why? Because she will subconsciously know she will never be able to handle that many children on her own. (+ a Statistic)Wtf. How did she raise you? | /r/TheRedPill | 04/05/19 02:02 PM |
| 1 | My theorie about how to avoid Divorce: "Have at least 3 children" Why? Because she will subconsciously know she will never be able to handle that many children on her own. (+ a Statistic)Well, you broke up with her, not the other way around. | /r/TheRedPill | 04/05/19 02:02 PM |
| 1 | My theorie about how to avoid Divorce: "Have at least 3 children" Why? Because she will subconsciously know she will never be able to handle that many children on her own. (+ a Statistic)Not every divorce is valid. You think just suddenly over the course of just a few decades women and men are incapable of staying together and marriages changed? Or do you think throughout all of human history most marriages were unhappy and just miserable for both spouses? What is it? Or do you recongize that women are given too much incentive for divorce and that our culture is something highly unusual? | /r/TheRedPill | 04/05/19 12:05 PM |
| 1 | My theorie about how to avoid Divorce: "Have at least 3 children" Why? Because she will subconsciously know she will never be able to handle that many children on her own. (+ a Statistic)This is about preventing divorce, before it happens. | /r/TheRedPill | 04/05/19 11:56 AM |
| 1 | My theorie about how to avoid Divorce: "Have at least 3 children" Why? Because she will subconsciously know she will never be able to handle that many children on her own. (+ a Statistic)You shouldn't tolerate a dead bedroom. Make advances, untill she gives in. Touch her, give her hugs. Kiss her face, if she doesn't let you kiss her lips. It might be wrong, but what do you have to lose? Living the rest of your life in an unhappy marriage with a dead bedroom? | /r/TheRedPill | 04/05/19 11:52 AM |
| 1 | My theorie about how to avoid Divorce: "Have at least 3 children" Why? Because she will subconsciously know she will never be able to handle that many children on her own. (+ a Statistic)Women managed to put out double that throughout history. Also Kegels. Also her hips will be wider and boobs might become bigger. Everyone wins. I think "that many kids will wreck your body" are just scare tactics to make women scared about having kids. | /r/TheRedPill | 04/05/19 11:32 AM |
| 1 | Marriage doesn't exist anymore. Call it something like "feminist civil law partnership". If she wants marriage, give her a private church wedding. That is what women want.I agree. I am going to marry. I am going to have a wedding, call it marriage, but I will not have the state involved. It's just going to be a thing between me and my wife and our families. | /r/TheRedPill | 02/05/19 02:20 PM |
| 1 | Marriage doesn't exist anymore. Call it something like "feminist civil law partnership". If she wants marriage, give her a private church wedding. That is what women want.I have to disagree about marriage being just a church insitution like you implied by calling it holy. It's a social insitution that existed before Christianity. Probably even in pre-history. Every culture that is semi-civilized and somewhat functional has a concept like marriage in their society. All of them basically existed as private insititutions. You didn't need any goverment or force to force them upon people like Feminism implies. This is a natural thing humans do. If your going to get ma… | /r/TheRedPill | 02/05/19 02:19 PM |
| 1 | Marriage doesn't exist anymore. Call it something like "feminist civil law partnership". If she wants marriage, give her a private church wedding. That is what women want.Woah. That sounds so plausible. Do you think this is even true for very Conservative Churches in the US? I am from Germany, so we don't have a conservative subculture that encourages virgin marriage here. | /r/TheRedPill | 02/05/19 01:49 PM |
| 1 | Marriage doesn't exist anymore. Call it something like "feminist civil law partnership". If she wants marriage, give her a private church wedding. That is what women want.That is one of the most bizzare things about all of this. Why are churches, even very evangelical ones, okay with this? They should see how marriage nower days has been twisted into something horrible. Of course only horrible if you divorce, but still. | /r/TheRedPill | 02/05/19 01:37 PM |
| 1 | Marriage doesn't exist anymore. Call it something like "feminist civil law partnership". If she wants marriage, give her a private church wedding. That is what women want.So that can already lead you to getting fucked over by divorce? | /r/TheRedPill | 02/05/19 01:36 PM |
| 1 | Marriage doesn't exist anymore. Call it something like "feminist civil law partnership". If she wants marriage, give her a private church wedding. That is what women want.Exactly. You can get sex, kids and everything else with just a gf. The concept of being shamed for having all of this without being married with the person is now completly foreign to us in this day and age. | /r/TheRedPill | 02/05/19 01:30 PM |
| 1 | Marriage doesn't exist anymore. Call it something like "feminist civil law partnership". If she wants marriage, give her a private church wedding. That is what women want.I am by no means an expert on England and common law countries, but to my knowledge there is something like a "common law marriage", even if the term itself isn't legally recognized. Something like a mechanism that automatically regards a couple that cohabit together as married exists in common law countries. But the thing is that most disputes arise when these couples divorce anyway. | /r/TheRedPill | 02/05/19 01:27 PM |
| 1 | Marriage doesn't exist anymore. Call it something like "feminist civil law partnership". If she wants marriage, give her a private church wedding. That is what women want.Marriage is dumb without a prenup and without the intent to have children. What would you say to couples married in the 50s, 60s or 70s that had a prenup, before the goverment insituted no fault divorce or other stuff like that? How do you write something in a prenup that might surive the feminist insanity of the next decades? | /r/TheRedPill | 02/05/19 01:21 PM |
| 1 | Marriage doesn't exist anymore. Call it something like "feminist civil law partnership". If she wants marriage, give her a private church wedding. That is what women want.The goverment basically changed all of the private contracts between individuals before. They can do it again. That's why I am sceptical about prenups. And it's not like you can just write into a prenup "Our marriage will work according to the legal rules of 19th century Prussian Civil Law" and then copypaste the law. | /r/TheRedPill | 02/05/19 01:19 PM |
| 1 | Marriage doesn't exist anymore. Call it something like "feminist civil law partnership". If she wants marriage, give her a private church wedding. That is what women want.We are all fucked. Some of us are more fucked than others. | /r/TheRedPill | 02/05/19 12:54 PM |
| 1 | Marriage doesn't exist anymore. Call it something like "feminist civil law partnership". If she wants marriage, give her a private church wedding. That is what women want.https://www.theguardian.com/law/2019/apr/09/no-fault-divorce-law-coming-as-soon-as-parliamentary-time-allows LOL | /r/TheRedPill | 02/05/19 12:52 PM |
| 1 | Marriage doesn't exist anymore. Call it something like "feminist civil law partnership". If she wants marriage, give her a private church wedding. That is what women want.I am from Germany. We have the AfD. One of the things on their agenda is to repeal no-fault divorce. Is there any party in the UK that advocates for that too? | /r/TheRedPill | 02/05/19 12:48 PM |
| 1 | Marriage doesn't exist anymore. Call it something like "feminist civil law partnership". If she wants marriage, give her a private church wedding. That is what women want.You are completly right. But here is the big but. You are probably from the US, which is a country with a common law legal system. I am very sorry to say this, but you guys ... are fucked. In civil law countries there is no such thing as in common law countries, where they recongize prolonged cohabitation and stuff you mentioned as a "practical marriage". You can totally get away with this in civil law countries. Common Law has many good things, but the combination of modern civil partnerships a… | /r/TheRedPill | 02/05/19 12:42 PM |
| 1 | Marriage doesn't exist anymore. Call it something like "feminist civil law partnership". If she wants marriage, give her a private church wedding. That is what women want.Nah man. Church Weddings aren't legally recongized. They are fine. It doesn't carry any legal consequences with it. In Germany they even recently abolished a law that was insitituted, while they were fighting political Catholicism, that makes it legal to do that now. Before it was technically illegal to have a church marriage without having a civil marriage, because many Catholics just ignored the civil marriage the state was offering. | /r/TheRedPill | 02/05/19 12:20 PM |
| 1 | A lot of hate from the redpill/incel/and other communities towards women comes from feeling cheated, when they find out that despite what they were taught, men and women aren't equal and play by different social rules. The Opposite is also true for many man-hating Feminists.Obtain intercourse, Jezebel. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 29/04/19 11:01 AM |
| 1 | Men don't have a type.can confirm I like pale white women with dark black hair. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 28/04/19 07:58 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter