TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Iambecomethrowaway2 Archive

View 2 posts and 42 comments by Iambecomethrowaway2 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

I'm going to watch this for my own interests, but I don't think a 44 minute video would be very helpful in a debate.
/r/MensRights11/03/17 07:55 PM
1

I was hoping someone had a copy pasta. Thanks
/r/MensRights11/03/17 03:28 PM
2

my post got removed, i got flamed, and i got mod warnings for pushing back against the people flaming me. that was fun. I hate mods, lol. if I didn't comment screenshots of one of them spamming my inbox they would have ignored me. They watched one guy all caps flame me but started bitching at me for saying fuck a few times and calling him smug. I also had an asshole tell me i was making it up and men are never forced to raise the kid their wife squirted out after cheating on him. That was fun. t…
/r/MensRights25/02/17 01:55 AM
2

that's what i said, but everyone in legal advice screeched at me until the mods came in lol.
/r/MensRights23/02/17 12:11 AM
7

He clearly felt attached to the child and wanted to keep it. He mentioned therapy. I dunno.
/r/MensRights22/02/17 08:45 PM
3

legally, sure, but he cared for the kid and mother for a long time thinking it was his.
/r/MensRights22/02/17 07:59 PM
2

So she can drown a baby in a toilet, but if a man doesn't pay for his ex wife's shoes he gets jail. equality!
/r/MensRights14/02/17 06:36 AM
10

The so-called “manosphere” is peopled with hundreds of websites, blogs and forums dedicated to savaging feminists in particular and women, very typically American women, in general. They didn't exactly stutter, man.
/r/MensRights13/02/17 01:04 AM
6

I'd compare the circumcision discussion to the weed legalization discussion. it's one of the issues that everyone knows needs to be fixed but the powers that be decide to be stubbornly difficult about the issue at every possible step. it's more the absurdity that the issue just hasn't been addressed by anyone wht significant pull. Also, sex negative people just need to fuck off. There's no excuse for that. even if you prefer modesty, are you seriously going to chop people's forksin off for the s…
/r/MensRights10/02/17 03:42 AM
23

What would you say if your dad lopped off your labia? what would you want him to say to you? You've taken your son's agency into your own hands and decided for him that he didn't need intact sensitivity. I'm not really sure what you want us to tell you.
/r/MensRights10/02/17 03:39 AM
6

"Popular" is just a lie if it is simply not the most popular subreddits. Like Youtube's "trending" being almost entirely buzzfeed and the like?
/r/MensRights09/02/17 12:09 AM
3

"Gamers are dead"
/r/MensRights09/02/17 12:08 AM
1

i didn't actually click the link because im a lazy sob.
/r/MensRights05/02/17 03:56 AM
1

lying to someone for a bone pretty comfortably fits in the "shitty person" box. shitting in the sink is to far but it's funny. calling him "rapey" is postal and she should be shunned just as hard as he should be.
/r/MensRights02/02/17 10:50 PM
2

so get it together dads: Oh, look, someone using "man up" in a non-condescending, selfish way. that's refreshing.
/r/MensRights31/01/17 01:10 AM
2

No no no. I'm saying to convict for a false claim made in civil court should still be held to the standard of beyond a reasonable doubt. The lower standard shouldn't carry over to finding out if someone lied.
/r/MensRights30/01/17 03:28 AM
3

Due process. If it can be proven beyond a reasonable doubt that you intentionally lied about a crime, then you're convicted. If this law was put in place, most cases would have no one found guilty, because "beyond a reasonable doubt" is a very high standard. In civil court, where the standard is much lower but still reasonably high, you should still need beyond a reasonable doubt that the misinformation was intentional. Edit: I'll give an example. Sally got shitfaced drunk and woke up feeling we…
/r/MensRights29/01/17 09:24 AM
3

"oops" okay lady.
/r/MensRights28/01/17 09:06 PM
7

Segregation is fine in this context, but treating half of us like a protected class is cancer.
/r/MensRights28/01/17 03:54 AM
1

That would be a huge task and we both know there would be literal riots if 2/3 the house and senate let that slide.
/r/MensRights27/01/17 11:13 PM
7

you can't be this stupid.
/r/MensRights24/01/17 04:24 AM
0

Trunp can't overturn Roe v Wade
/r/MensRights24/01/17 04:23 AM
2

So i don't really have the energy to address all this, not that I don't appreciate the effort, but i have a few points i feel really need to be hammered in. feminism does not equal women have you considered that the two movements could actually be at odds with each other in a lot of ways? Even the most righteous MRA-related situations are met with pushback and often plain illegal silencing tactics from feminism. Do you honestly see criticism of your movement as "misogynistic?" If so, I'd ask you…
/r/MensRights20/01/17 07:44 AM
6

it bothers me how tinhat this sounds, yet how true it seems to be. they're trying to classify sex robots as some flavor of rape and they even stigmatize fleshlights.
/r/MensRights13/01/17 09:43 PM
1

Stop being so silly
/r/MensRights13/01/17 08:45 PM
1

This is generally the case with any tournament species, but the ratio is way to high to simply be a case of biology. biology is definitely a factor, but womanworsting and the woman are wonderful effect also contribute to the ratio of men to women in prisons.
/r/MensRights07/01/17 02:31 AM
3

it's illegal though.. that sounds like a lot of fuss to me.
/r/MensRights06/01/17 07:08 AM
3

talking over your student is pretty classy. lol
/r/MensRights06/01/17 07:06 AM
1

He did.
/r/MensRights10/10/16 07:19 PM
2

Supply and demand doesn't apply here so concretely. one guy can entertain more than one female. one female can entertain more than one man. it's not a series of pairs it's a web of connections. you're also assuming people will "settle." human sexuality (dating) isn't like buying furniture. by design some people fail.
/r/MensRights18/09/16 10:00 PM
2

it's more than simple supply and demand. women see average men as below average. even if it was 1 to 1, all the female attention would pool to the most attractive males.
/r/MensRights18/09/16 06:50 AM
1

vote with your wallet. buy stuff you like, ignore stuff you don't like. boycotting a company for their ideals is bullying.
/r/MensRights18/09/16 06:45 AM
3

Talking about his bulge isn't a problem. Talking about women's tits is't a problem. the double standard is a problem.
/r/MensRights18/09/16 06:43 AM
3

they're eihter not in a good place mentally or a troll. they pmed me. I'd drop it if i were you.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/09/16 03:34 PM
1

the hero we need
/r/PussyPassDenied16/09/16 02:04 PM
1

was this filmed on a potato? or maybe a smooshed up ball of rice?
/r/PussyPassDenied16/09/16 02:02 PM
9

when most rapists dont get jail time got a source for that buddy? A false claim ruins people's iife. it puts people in jail. some people kill themselves even after they've been proven innocent because "man found innocent of that rape we said he did" articals are rare and don't get as much attention. At the risk of sounding like a jerk, what is wrong with you?
/r/PussyPassDenied16/09/16 02:42 AM
2

I meant it's not real. "sexual objectification" is a bullshit mechanism that says seeing people in sexual situations makes violence against them easier. it un-ironically states that someone with pinup posters or calendars are more likely to beat, rape, and kill women BECAUSE of the posters. it's 100% fake and it' was made up by shitty old pearl clutching people to justify and legitimize their sex negative bullshit. Just like how blindness, hairy palms, and other symptoms were made up to demonize…
/r/MensRights16/09/16 02:15 AM
1

When I said "it's not a problem." i meant "it doesn't happen." it's a fake mechanism invented by pearl clutches to justify their toxic sex negativity.
/r/MensRights16/09/16 02:06 AM
16

II think it's pretty clear that the arrest was just throwing the book at him. I bet the girl in question was 16 at the time and the rest of that shit was really stretched and extrapolated bullshit.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/09/16 11:39 PM
8

'sexual objectification' isn't a problem. especially in media. pointing out the double standard is necessary to take the wind out of the argument*, but no one is being hurt by massive tits or chiseled abs on TV.
/r/MensRights15/09/16 08:27 PM
12

The only time that would bother me is if the bus/train/whatever was full.
/r/MensRights15/09/16 08:08 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter