TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

IameAuhSomme Archive

View 0 posts and 532 comments by IameAuhSomme on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-35

Yeah, I was initially confused why you posted /u/nwordcop but then I went through a few of the comment histories of people in this thread. Also they all instantly got extraordinary defensive and reactionary, which is almost always a surefire sign.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/08/21 11:31 AM
2

I believe we are arguing two different things here. You are right in your point that statistical conclusions cannot or should not be drawn from small samples; eg, because two women have been found to be good at chess, does not say anything about women as a whole playing chess. I agree with you on that. However, the argument I was making was that because we definitely have empirical evidence of two women who ARE good at chess, we can therefore conclude that, assuming very few fundamental differen…
/r/MensRights20/04/15 06:30 PM
-1

Empirical evidence is observational or experimental data to the effect of an argument. Sample size has no bearing on whether it is or not.
/r/MensRights20/04/15 01:54 PM
3

There's a sub for feminist MRA debates?
/r/MensRights20/01/15 02:49 PM
3

My opinion on this piece is that it's a start into self-awareness of modern feminism and perhaps change. She may very well have added an opinion she doesn't agree with at the end to force people to not automatically dismiss her argument, as is sadly commonplace today, not just in gender debates.
/r/MensRights20/01/15 02:32 PM
5

I wouldn't say they were brought about entirely by feminism, but the vocal minority of feminists sure does like to ignore it anyway.
/r/MensRights20/01/15 02:12 PM
2

a bunch of nerds are at a LAN party when the air raid siren sounds "HIPSTER BOMBERS!! MAN THE FLAK CANNONS!!"
/r/MensRights04/10/14 05:02 PM
21

I don't know why you were downvoted. Anyone wanting to circumcise anyone for nonmedical reasons is a bad thing.
/r/MensRights23/11/13 09:30 PM
1

And it loves you.
/r/MensRights09/11/13 06:38 PM
15

we're all just wonderful
/r/MensRights09/11/13 07:59 AM
2

Ok good, sorry about that.
/r/MensRights05/11/13 08:51 PM
3

Moreso because they are scum and because the police are not easily able to prosecute. I'm sorry, this just sounded a lot like a justification for mob violence.
/r/MensRights05/11/13 06:33 PM
2

Vigilante groups are inherently a terrible idea in the first place. The promotion of mob mentality will only ever ultimately lead to the destruction of lives, innocent or not, either through social pariahship (expulsion) or literally burning someone in the street.
/r/MensRights05/11/13 06:12 PM
2

Why would anyone need "reason" when you can so easily jump to conclusions based on what you feel is right? Check your privilege, logiclord. /s
/r/MensRights05/11/13 03:46 PM
3

And not listening to/knowing about radical feminists.
/r/MensRights05/11/13 03:43 PM
8

It does no service to victims to promote inflated statistics and impulsively attack any person who presents contrary information as a “rape denier.” This. This a thousand times.
/r/MensRights05/11/13 03:32 PM
1

Like all things, it gets more complicated the more you look at it.
/r/MensRights05/11/13 02:59 PM
3

Making some trouble in the neighborhood EDIT: He got in one little fight, and the mods got scared They said "You're going to be banned to /r/BelAir."
/r/MensRights05/11/13 02:20 PM
1

...so Chinese chickens reading Japanese books? Sweden: a nation of manga.
/r/MensRights04/11/13 03:35 PM
1

Thänks for the warñing.
/r/MensRights04/11/13 03:32 PM
3

It's not the fallacies or even the censorship that annoy me the most. It's the condescending assertion that your opinion automatically requires no critical examination or even thought. You cannot change a predetermined mind.
/r/MensRights04/11/13 02:57 PM
1

In my experience, the reason people who think like that think the way they do is because they hold positions of power and can afford to.
/r/MensRights04/11/13 04:29 AM
9

Yeah, and just a heads up, asking a girl out for coffee is rape.
/r/MensRights04/11/13 02:55 AM
2

Where's /u/Everything_is_Rape when you need him/her?
/r/MensRights04/11/13 02:50 AM
11

Ask her why she holds such an anti-free-speech opinion, and what horrendous thing /r/mensrights has done to deserve it.
/r/MensRights04/11/13 02:43 AM
5

Shut up, Meg.
/r/MensRights01/11/13 05:05 PM
2

The governments of the world trust feminists, because there are a lot of feminists in government.
/r/MensRights01/11/13 04:58 PM
3

THOSE DAMN CUPCAKES
/r/MensRights01/11/13 04:53 PM
3

/s I'm sorry for interrupting, but did someone drop this?
/r/MensRights01/11/13 04:47 PM
1

Original Shepard ftw
/r/MensRights01/11/13 06:31 AM
1

they come oh god they come the sloths /r/fearme
/r/MensRights01/11/13 05:59 AM
3

Well then we need more people who rely on logical instead of emotional reasoning to make their decisions.
/r/MensRights31/10/13 02:44 PM
1

Goddamned hipsters are taking over.
/r/MensRights31/10/13 01:25 PM
3

We need more left-brained people who won't just jump to what they feel is emotionally right.
/r/MensRights31/10/13 01:17 PM
3

Happy halloween.
/r/MensRights31/10/13 01:15 PM
1

dammit why'd you have to bring it up Jesse
/r/MensRights31/10/13 04:00 AM
2

Rand would say it didn't matter.
/r/MensRights30/10/13 08:29 PM
14

They were simultaneously raping each other.
/r/MensRights30/10/13 06:56 PM
5

Brilliant.
/r/MensRights30/10/13 06:55 PM
27

Fucking thank you. You can't act all rational one moment, then autocratic the next, and call it consistent and fair minded.
/r/MensRights30/10/13 05:45 PM
1

...wasn't the term "rape culture" coined by prisoners trying to reform the prison system? I find it a bit sad that while women's studies has taken the term and overblown it into what we have today, the original people have gotten no help whatsoever, and now are pretty much erased from history by FemSoc.
/r/MensRights30/10/13 02:01 PM
1

Be careful, though. "Pushing for the children" is what got us into this child support mess in the first place.
/r/MensRights29/10/13 08:44 PM
1

Yes, but the situation described by OP seems more of a religious pressure than active malintent.
/r/MensRights29/10/13 08:03 PM
2

It's like they don't even know what they're doing when they publicly release the name of a victim.
/r/MensRights29/10/13 07:52 PM
2

Damn. Thanks.
/r/MensRights29/10/13 07:31 PM
2

Also tell them that feminism, by definition, strives for the empowerment of women. When women had little rights, this meant striving towards equality; however, it never meant to stop there.
/r/MensRights29/10/13 07:20 PM
1

The chair?
/r/MensRights29/10/13 07:17 PM
3

Dude...fusball, Xbox, and free food? Now I just need a wife.
/r/MensRights29/10/13 06:47 PM
1

Stand down, everyone, false alarm. puts down broom
/r/MensRights29/10/13 03:21 AM
5

shush, you.
/r/MensRights29/10/13 03:06 AM
1

Sometimes, out of nowhere, I get a really sharp pain in my left chest and I feel sort of winded for a couple seconds. I never really knew what it was, could it be panic attacks?
/r/MensRights29/10/13 02:56 AM
20

Breaks my heart. At least he'll receive his complimentary Mercedes, made by an all-women factory, when he applies for automatic entry into a High Ranking Position in the government or a large corporation.
/r/MensRights29/10/13 02:48 AM
4

Probably also due to the low college rate, this.
/r/MensRights29/10/13 02:38 AM
19

...wait, you didn't get a Ferrari?
/r/MensRights29/10/13 01:43 AM
138

you won't fool me twice karl
/r/MensRights29/10/13 01:42 AM
0

....wut
/r/MensRights21/10/13 03:34 AM
2

I don't believe that's what sarcasm is.
/r/MensRights19/10/13 07:34 PM
3

neither is FemSoc.
/r/MensRights19/10/13 07:29 PM
1

At least they didn't go after Tyson. That would be fucking barbaric.
/r/MensRights17/10/13 06:47 PM
6

Noone can be oblivious to the benefits available to the young and famous, whether they're young or famous or not. People in those positions got in those positions through seeing and taking opportunities that came their way.
/r/MensRights15/10/13 06:36 PM
9

I would even go as far as to say that you don't want to win the kindergarten debate. Play the long game.
/r/MensRights12/10/13 10:29 PM
4

Which is why the /s flag exists.
/r/MensRights12/10/13 04:02 PM
1

You are forgiven, my child.
/r/MensRights11/10/13 07:00 PM
1

I propose the introduction of the /j tag, so that people stop following me and taking my jokes seriously.
/r/MensRights11/10/13 06:15 PM
1

...it was a reference to the Wizard of Oz...
/r/MensRights11/10/13 06:14 PM
2

Goddamn postmodernists. Objectivity isn't subjective!
/r/MensRights11/10/13 04:49 PM
2

OR IS HE
/r/MensRights11/10/13 04:46 PM
1

"Are you a good witch or a bad witch?"
/r/MensRights11/10/13 04:37 PM
1

I concur.
/r/MensRights11/10/13 04:35 PM
2

Even then they didn't really, when they pushed for suffrage, but not for the draft, and then had the nerve to start the White Feather campaign.
/r/MensRights11/10/13 04:13 PM
1

Rational thinking, and an aversion to emotional pleading.
/r/MensRights11/10/13 04:11 PM
2

It's...it's...p...patriarchy! waves hands
/r/MensRights11/10/13 04:09 PM
1

The boys were obviously oppressing the girls by not letting them be violent.
/r/MensRights11/10/13 03:53 PM
1

...good for you?
/r/MensRights11/10/13 03:49 PM
1

Just like the government shutdown.
/r/MensRights11/10/13 03:47 PM
2

As can be implied from the suicide rate.
/r/MensRights11/10/13 03:37 PM
2

Our statistics are true because I got them from a friend of mine who I told to tell me were true, so ha!
/r/MensRights11/10/13 03:35 PM
3

Her point was that while the brutal and violent side exists in everyone, women are assumed not to have it.
/r/MensRights11/10/13 03:29 PM
2

Congress?
/r/MensRights11/10/13 03:09 PM
11

Rightsdownvotebot?
/r/MensRights11/10/13 02:38 PM
1

It's almost as if gender has absolutely nothing to do with political inclination.
/r/MensRights11/10/13 01:47 AM
1

Welcome to modern day radical feminist ideology.
/r/MensRights10/10/13 05:11 PM
1

I dunno about that, have you looked at the fridge lately?
/r/MensRights10/10/13 05:09 PM
0

You can start a secret society maybe.
/r/MensRights10/10/13 05:08 PM
0

Sadly, radical feminism has confused the issue by proclaiming itself to represent the goals of the whole of the modern day movement. Women who would thus support normal egalitarian feminism now find themselves drawn into the radical part through a combination of misinformative propaganda and peer pressure.
/r/MensRights10/10/13 05:03 PM
2

...that was beautiful.
/r/MensRights10/10/13 05:01 PM
2

I'm especially beautiful, if I do say so myself.
/r/MensRights10/10/13 04:59 PM
5

Yes, don't take it so literally. "God-given" just means "given by nature of being human" in this case.
/r/MensRights10/10/13 04:55 PM
12

Looks like it.
/r/MensRights10/10/13 04:51 PM
2

The problem really stems from the general movement towards emotionally subjective reasoning, and away from facts and logic.
/r/MensRights10/10/13 04:48 PM
2

No, you hit the nail on the head, this is exactly the problem. Empowering one gender only leads to more inequality.
/r/MensRights10/10/13 04:46 PM
10

Quick! Hack OP before he takes it down!
/r/MensRights10/10/13 04:36 PM
27

Rapezoning?
/r/MensRights10/10/13 04:34 PM
1

"When I'm out flying with my friends, I always stop by the local Red Cross facility, because we have a blast with Red Cross Blood. Drink responsibly."
/r/MensRights08/10/13 02:39 PM
23

Time to sue everyone.
/r/MensRights08/10/13 02:27 PM
1

I don't think you understand... life, really.
/r/MensRights07/10/13 08:46 PM
3

dammit satan i'm getting real tired of your shit
/r/MensRights07/10/13 08:44 PM
1

This is an example where statistics can be plied into any shape you want.
/r/MensRights07/10/13 08:43 PM
5

Because it gives the everyman a sense of entitlement to think that maybe he's smarter than all those doctors with fancy degrees. People will always mistrust what they do not understand; thus, given a push, the scientifically illiterate will abandon the advice of medical professionals. Another reasoning for such a movement is a effect misjudgement; autism seems so much worse than measles, the rate of which is low at the moment. They fail to realize the flaw in their logic until it's too late and …
/r/MensRights07/10/13 07:47 PM
2

Those who control the present control the past.
/r/MensRights07/10/13 03:47 PM
9

It really pays to never marry. I'm sorry this happened to you.
/r/MensRights07/10/13 03:43 PM
26

I'm really becoming scared as to where this trend is heading.
/r/MensRights07/10/13 03:41 PM
13

This reminds me of that scene from 1984. You know, that one where he was being tortured and his torturer was trying to make him understand that 2 + 2 = 5.
/r/MensRights07/10/13 03:40 PM
81

A mother's instincts are BETTER than those old scientists in their lab coats. That's why across the UK mothers stopped giving their children vaccinations. We all know that turned out splendidly, didn't it?
/r/MensRights07/10/13 03:36 PM
0

Just like the rest of the West Wing! ;)
/r/MensRights07/10/13 03:18 PM
3

And suffering! Don't forget the suffering!
/r/MensRights07/10/13 03:12 PM
1

Even so, this bastardization of facts and statistics seems more like something religious conservatives would do than moderate liberals.
/r/MensRights07/10/13 01:48 PM
6

I like the secret handshake idea.
/r/MensRights07/10/13 01:43 PM
23

Welcome to the world of emotional projection and straw men.
/r/MensRights07/10/13 01:42 PM
14

Also, more importantly, those people on the Internet I like to blindly believe can't get money if I'm not frightened by the big scary MHRM!
/r/MensRights07/10/13 01:40 PM
1

Real legitimate rapes, you mean.
/r/MensRights07/10/13 03:18 AM
1

They would be at a loss for something to lobby (and raise money) for if they actually fixed the problem.
/r/MensRights07/10/13 01:47 AM
3

Sounds rather familiar, doesn't it?
/r/MensRights06/10/13 11:14 PM
11

That's probably why they're so much more likely to commit suicide. Self assurance.
/r/MensRights06/10/13 09:54 PM
-2

ME, FUCKFACE!!
/r/MensRights04/10/13 03:31 PM
2

One of those diverse views happens to be censorship :P
/r/MensRights04/10/13 03:18 PM
5

I think the reason the article is so condescending at first is to trick feminists into reading more; from my experience, they'll be much more likely to take in information if they believe the informator agrees with their position. To be fair to the author, the explanation of the structure of MRA does give a good impression in general, and may help to disabuse women of the moronic presupposition that "all MRAs are inherently misogynistic."
/r/MensRights04/10/13 03:16 PM
1

You wouldn't understand.
/r/MensRights04/10/13 02:47 PM
2

The whole welfare system needs to be reformed, really. Specific eligibility, food coupons, housing, etc.
/r/MensRights04/10/13 01:22 PM
1

Ah, ok thank you.
/r/MensRights03/10/13 04:26 PM
2

It shouldn't be equality; rather, equivalency. It reminds me of a short film I saw about a future US where a "Handicapper General" passed policy that brought all people to the same level with weights and brain inhibitors.
/r/MensRights03/10/13 02:37 PM
28

One day, I hope they don't suspend people for acting out their natural and unharmful desires. One day, I hope people will stop listening to tabloid news that say watching violence in media will make children violent.
/r/MensRights03/10/13 02:21 PM
12

Locksmiths colleges are the key to keys.
/r/MensRights02/10/13 07:46 PM
3

a nice refresher
/r/MensRights02/10/13 04:01 PM
1

someone should make satire of the satire
/r/MensRights02/10/13 03:45 PM
1

Good. At least the military is consistent in their justice proceedings.
/r/MensRights02/10/13 03:43 PM
1

Literally, my ass is off. Please someone call 911...
/r/MensRights02/10/13 03:20 PM
6

Wording of your complaint is crucial here.
/r/MensRights02/10/13 03:18 PM
1

Would it be the same if you reversed the genders?
/r/MensRights02/10/13 03:17 PM
1

The very idea of consciousness IS free will. You cannot have one without the other. If you don't have free will and cannot make decisions, you are not conscious because you cannot think.
/r/MensRights02/10/13 01:46 PM
1

Most people are reasonable, yes.
/r/MensRights02/10/13 01:44 PM
1

Brain != mind I'm defining a "mind" as a "consciousness", which has the defining characteristic of possessing independent agency.
/r/MensRights02/10/13 02:12 AM
1

They say they're oppressed because feminist leaders tell them they are. They aren't connecting the actual definition of "oppression" to their personal situation, because it makes them feel special and entitled to ask for help. Give any otherwise normal group "oppressed" status, and you'll see a majority requesting extra social concessions.
/r/MensRights01/10/13 09:08 PM
1

Really?
/r/MensRights01/10/13 09:01 PM
1

Illusion cannot exist without a mind, and a mind cannot exist without free will for it to act into. In a strictly deterministic universe, a mind cannot exist; there must be at least one agency with free will (as assumed on the self-evident fact of self existence), or else it's not an illusion.
/r/MensRights01/10/13 08:46 PM
1

It's great that women can vote. They deserve just as equal rights as anyone and everyone else, and the people who brought that around are wonderful in that respect. However, the suffragettes also conveniently forgot to push for actual equality when they refused to put women in the draft, then had the nerve to start a campaign coward-shaming people who didn't want to fight. Hitler commissioned the production of the Volkswagen Beetle, yet it would be pretty silly to call people who bought that car…
/r/MensRights01/10/13 07:46 PM
38

It's the same with the opposite side. The patriarchy isn't actually real.
/r/MensRights01/10/13 06:53 PM
2

Or a bottle of snake venom.
/r/MensRights01/10/13 04:51 PM
1

I knew it! Kim Il Sung is Khan!
/r/MensRights01/10/13 04:49 PM
1

Oh.
/r/MensRights01/10/13 04:41 PM
7

They're more like 130% with her, adding words to her mouth.
/r/MensRights01/10/13 02:43 PM
3

It's more like "think of how what we do to the children will make me look good".
/r/MensRights01/10/13 02:40 PM
3

Let me rephrase that. Ignorance is easy to fix, while intentional ignorance is the main tenet of fanatical ideologies, and the number one enemy of scientific and social progress. The girl referenced by OP does not show intentional ignorance, merely a subconscious lack of thought to her words.
/r/MensRights01/10/13 02:09 PM
7

She's not fucked up, just ignorant, and ignorance is easy to fix.
/r/MensRights01/10/13 01:41 PM
1

In order for illusion to exist, consciousness must exist, and by extension free will.
/r/MensRights01/10/13 12:41 PM
2

With the power of the Internet, you can do anything.
/r/MensRights01/10/13 03:44 AM
1

About your rationalization for determinism. You seem to be undef the false assumption that illusion in the mind necessitates the existence of free will; you fail to realize that under a deterministic standpoint, there is no "mind" in the first place.
/r/MensRights01/10/13 03:39 AM
1

According to star trek we'll start the Eugenics Wars soon.
/r/MensRights01/10/13 03:37 AM
2

"When you copy your enemy you become him."
/r/MensRights01/10/13 02:07 AM
5

Or inbetweener
/r/MensRights30/09/13 10:17 PM
1

I've been getting even more and more reasons to miss this great man lately. His mind was brilliant, but his eloquence was perfect.
/r/MensRights26/09/13 09:45 PM
3

WHO THE HELL IS THIS "GRANDMA" YOU KEEP TEXTING
/r/MensRights26/09/13 09:36 PM
1

What did you do?
/r/MensRights26/09/13 09:34 PM
1

Passive aggressive is the worst aggressive.
/r/MensRights26/09/13 09:34 PM
1

But also know that if they back out of it when you inform them, unless they're just uncomfortable about it, they wouldn't want what they're about to say to end up in a court of law.
/r/MensRights26/09/13 09:09 PM
1

And knowing is half the battle!
/r/MensRights26/09/13 09:00 PM
22

And this is one of the reasons doublethink exists among groups such as feminism and creationism and conspiracy theorists. They perceive refutations to their arguments, yet the refutations must be false because they have a gut feeling in their subconscious that their worldview is utterly and completely correct. It's a difficult battle to fight, because when the ingrained moral fabric of someone's subthought becomes warped to fit the reality of a movement's leaders, it's almost impossible to make …
/r/MensRights26/09/13 06:17 PM
3

between the third and fourth ribs
/r/MensRights26/09/13 06:12 PM
1

You will find less disagreement, then, if you do not inform readers what they should and should not view as quality and constructive content.
/r/MensRights25/09/13 05:19 PM
4

Isn't that almost precisely what radical feminists accuse the patriarchy of doing in Congress? Why is it now okay all of a sudden?
/r/MensRights25/09/13 03:30 PM
6

Doxxing. If the information presented is both without merit AND presents a clear danger to another's life and/or safety, it should be suppressed. Such is the choice we make when choosing to live in large groups.
/r/MensRights25/09/13 03:19 PM
8

If you want a war, go to /r/war. If you wish to discuss gender issues in an open forum, feel free to stay.
/r/MensRights25/09/13 03:17 PM
6

And many a lie believed.
/r/MensRights25/09/13 02:43 PM
-2

Censorship is sometimes a necessary evil, however, such as in instances where the publication of information would harm or limit the free speech of others.
/r/MensRights25/09/13 01:37 PM
3

He's a goddamned comedian. Why can't people just laugh and NOT take him seriously?
/r/MensRights25/09/13 01:14 PM
3

Wouldn't that be... I don't know, the exact fucking opposite of objectivity?
/r/MensRights25/09/13 01:13 PM
6

Perhaps this example exemplifies how modern-day feminism is being shown OBJECTIVELY to be degrading in both moral principles and support among intellectuals. The framework of victimhood that feminists of the past reinforced when they were actually victims (but also when they couldn't be bothered to put themselves on the draft while clamoring for 'equality') is cemented so deeply in our society today that now feminists can literally do anything and still be victims. False rape accusal? It's becau…
/r/MensRights25/09/13 01:05 PM
11

"Because science doesn't work that way, and objectivity is not subjective, you twit." ...is what I'd say if someone were to make those arguments to me.
/r/MensRights25/09/13 12:54 PM
4

Look at how people accused of rape fare now in the courts. A law like this would only make things exponentially worse.
/r/MensRights25/09/13 12:29 PM
5

I think the gist of the article was that this story is used often as a fable, which went like "Back in the olden days, a man who abused his wife was whipped in public." The article seeks to make the clarification that "abuse" was quite a broad word in those times.
/r/MensRights25/09/13 12:26 PM
7

As often is the case in radical movements, it is the vocal minority leaders that spearheads the injustice, while the rest sit around and support them without really paying attention.
/r/MensRights25/09/13 12:17 PM
1

There. Danger realized. I just saved human civilization.
/r/MensRights25/09/13 02:03 AM
1

As I said before, self preservation takes precedence over greed.
/r/MensRights25/09/13 12:34 AM
11

But they do have tech power.
/r/MensRights24/09/13 08:28 PM
40

By the vast majority of male IT.
/r/MensRights24/09/13 06:08 PM
1

The Great Red Spot is larger than the Earth. Unless "heavy gas-taking" involves siphoning off gas reserves as big as the Moon, I don't think we have anything to worry about for the next several hundred thousand years. Even so, we would stop long before we could alter the planet's mass significantly, because Jupiter quite literally acts as a bodyguard deflecting bullets from the inner solar system; its large mass attracts most asteroids and comets before they can even think about making it to Ear…
/r/MensRights24/09/13 04:09 AM
1

I'm gonna have to disagree with you there. We haven't nearly depleted our oil reserves, and we'd start mining water from glaciers before we mined it from asteroids. Our resources aren't as thin as you'd think; it's just the environment we have to worry about at the present moment. Also, mining the solar system would do nothing at all to the orbits of the planets, unless we nuked the Moon into Venus or something.
/r/MensRights24/09/13 01:10 AM
4

While Pecanpig admittedly didn't give reasonable clarification for your misunderstanding, you did ask a rather venomously loaded question, making the assumption that a person who commented on a statistic being within an expected range would personally wish to ignore the rights violation of an entire group of people, and based only upon a tenuous link to the words "I hope". Please think about what you assume before becoming angry at your own mistakes.
/r/MensRights23/09/13 06:41 PM
2

Thank you, but I think the misunderstanding was an easy one to make based on how you worded it. It's noone's fault, really, other than the English language.
/r/MensRights23/09/13 06:32 PM
0

/srs
/r/MensRights23/09/13 06:24 PM
4

I think what Pecanpig was trying to say was that with the overwhelming majority of the armed forces being men, the fact that the majority of sexual assaults happen to men is not surprising. I don't think they were trying to brush it off as a trivial thing, just trying to say that the statistics make sense in context, without external influence.
/r/MensRights23/09/13 06:23 PM
5

The Entitlement Era? I like it.
/r/MensRights23/09/13 06:17 PM
12

Solipsist checking in: that might not even exist after all.
/r/MensRights23/09/13 05:51 PM
6

Well, it's the Daily Mail. What else would you expect from a publication that helped start the vaccine scare, which directly resulted in a dramatic increase in measles?
/r/MensRights23/09/13 03:26 PM
2

They silenced the truth!
/r/MensRights23/09/13 03:22 PM
2

See: 1984.
/r/MensRights23/09/13 03:21 PM
84

If she cheats on you, that means you were obviously abusive , which thus means that SHE gets to hit YOU. /s
/r/MensRights23/09/13 01:23 AM
1

Get some pie charts up in this shit.
/r/MensRights23/09/13 12:56 AM
6

My hackles remain unraised.
/r/MensRights22/09/13 05:35 PM
-1

I have three.
/r/MensRights21/09/13 07:48 PM
1

This would be an interesting study if further verified.
/r/MensRights21/09/13 07:45 PM
1

Who the fuck said it would? That's like saying cutting off your ear will prevent the transmission of rabies.
/r/MensRights21/09/13 04:38 PM
2

Damn, things are never simple.
/r/MensRights21/09/13 04:05 PM
9

"Justice."
/r/MensRights21/09/13 07:38 AM
1

I don't follow.
/r/MensRights21/09/13 05:13 AM
4

Plausible deniability, my ass. Their immediate and unhesitated positive reaction to the alarm is all the proof anyone should need that they at least fully supported doing it.
/r/MensRights21/09/13 05:11 AM
2

Would Satanic rape be legitimate, though?
/r/MensRights20/09/13 01:50 PM
1

You sound like a COMMUNIST to me, and I don't listen to no commie logic 'cause this is 'Murica.
/r/MensRights20/09/13 01:47 PM
1

I define "complaining" as "informing others of a problem", and "whining" as "informing others of a problem with the expectation that eventually someone will tire of you and fix it for you". It's the assumption that the needs of women be solved by everyone else changing that I find arrogant and whiney.
/r/MensRights20/09/13 01:02 PM
1

complaining != whining You may complain about someone bullying you, is that whining? The point I was making is that when feminists don't get their way nowadays, they're always so offended, and they always seem to think that their offense should actually carry weight in academic discussion.
/r/MensRights20/09/13 12:16 PM
7

All those starving and disease ridden children and miserable families eking out a meager existence in the backwaters of the world under oppressive and authoritarian rule are irrelevant in the face of how uncomfortable and offended some people are at not having their way.
/r/MensRights19/09/13 10:52 PM
2

That's what i meant. If people understood how to apply the scientific method to anything they wanted to know, we wouldn't be at the place we are at now.
/r/MensRights19/09/13 08:52 PM
3

And thus, scientific education is the MOST important priority for our country.
/r/MensRights19/09/13 06:31 PM
3

I daresay, it sounds like the person who wrote this is a female pedophile, and is trying to divert attention. Just my opinion, though.
/r/MensRights19/09/13 02:30 PM
13

It means whatever she wants it to mean. That's the thing, a tactic feminists often use: try and impress with fancy but nevertheless intellectually vapid rhetoric, then when someone calls them out on it publicly shame them for being too ignorant to understand or woman hating.
/r/MensRights19/09/13 02:28 PM
12

Exactly. They're trying exactly what Creationism tried and is trying to do, try and override actual science with emotional pleading and whining. My god, the whining.
/r/MensRights19/09/13 02:25 PM
28

Both terms are going the way "socialist" went, to mean "something I don't like and therefore would like to denigrate". The words themselves are now almost devoid of any actual meaning in our collective consciousness.
/r/MensRights19/09/13 02:21 PM
1

Because they aren't given the advantageous position society gives women.
/r/MensRights19/09/13 01:30 PM
24

Damn you, now I can't correct it
/r/MensRights19/09/13 03:32 AM
5

"You reap what you sow." that lady who wrote Men on Strike
/r/MensRights19/09/13 01:58 AM
4

It's actually scaring me how much of a cultish religion it's becoming.
/r/MensRights19/09/13 01:56 AM
20

Bany steps.
/r/MensRights19/09/13 01:49 AM
7

Really? I have to use /s all the time now?
/r/MensRights19/09/13 01:46 AM
-1

Damn bitches be cray.
/r/MensRights18/09/13 08:00 PM
1

Dammit you spoiled jk rowling's new crossover book She hasn't even written it yet
/r/MensRights18/09/13 05:21 PM
1

I...what...but....common human decency...WHAT?
/r/MensRights18/09/13 12:47 PM
1

Oneiorosgrip said: "Not just taken down... on top of that, the sub's detractors also demonized a mod brought in to keep out photos of minors, clamored for his identity, and got it - then flooded his employer with angry phone calls until he was fired from his job, all after learning from the story in which he was doxxed that doing so would take away the only income supporting his disabled wife. Not only was there outrage - they crucified an individual and his family just for his becoming associat…
/r/MensRights17/09/13 11:21 PM
1

The "subs's detractors".
/r/MensRights17/09/13 08:33 PM
2

I was under the impression that they lied to his boss about his involvement.
/r/MensRights17/09/13 05:46 PM
2

No, because it's not the expression of an opinion, fact, or anything really but the libelous silencing of another person.
/r/MensRights17/09/13 05:30 PM
3

The point of the post was to recognize a pattern in a set of facts released. Other factors could be involved, yes, but also remember that this is part of a broader trend, as is exemplified by many other posts.
/r/MensRights16/09/13 07:59 PM
4

It's not a logistics question so much as a question as to why the government would be both opening a large prison AND converting an existing female one, unless there was a larger proportion of males to females.
/r/MensRights16/09/13 06:47 PM
5

The closing of a female prison further signifies and exemplifies the preexisting bias towards men in the form of a systematic trend of harsher sentencing than women. That is why people care. Try harder.
/r/MensRights16/09/13 06:36 PM
4

It's this general apathy towards the problems of other groups that has subtly plagued civilizations since the dawn of mankind. Interestingly enough, this kind of tribalism is one of the main accusations flung at men by radical feminists. The general public, and especially those egalitarian women who only label themselves as feminists because they don't know any better, need to wake up and look at where their leaders are steering the ship.
/r/MensRights16/09/13 06:28 PM
1

How did you find me?
/r/MensRights16/09/13 06:15 PM
1

I love me too.
/r/MensRights16/09/13 05:07 PM
2

Just because something is achieved violently does nothing to invalidate the cause.
/r/MensRights16/09/13 03:49 PM
3

Yet it's sexist to point out the sexism.
/r/MensRights16/09/13 03:31 PM
3

Correction: People are naturally deceptive, especially when society gives them a manipulative advantage.
/r/MensRights16/09/13 03:30 PM
0

The obvious conclusion is that the poor womyn are being mind-controlled by evil patriarchy aliens. Praise Xenu!
/r/MensRights16/09/13 03:29 PM
4

You're right.
/r/MensRights16/09/13 02:09 PM
2

There are some like that, yes.
/r/MensRights16/09/13 01:02 PM
5

The Onion should write a counter article to this, exactly reversing the roles.
/r/MensRights16/09/13 12:12 PM
16

Pfffft, freedom of speech is so mysognist.
/r/MensRights16/09/13 12:10 PM
1

Let's not be too hasty here. You don't know if missssghost is even a feminist, nor if he/she does not want a rational discussion.
/r/MensRights29/08/13 11:53 PM
2

Is there an air marshal aboard?
/r/MensRights29/08/13 10:19 PM
3

I doubt it was intentional, probably just a glitch from non-default subbing?
/r/MensRights25/08/13 12:37 PM
7

You cannot argue with doublethink. No matter how much they may agree with you, you are still wrong.
/r/MensRights25/08/13 12:28 PM
3

No of course not. Punishments should never discriminate based on gender.
/r/MensRights21/08/13 10:03 PM
2

All persons are granted two sets of rights, those inalienable, and those afforded to maintain a stable society. Those who violate the rights of others are stripped of the latter, sometimes even the former, but never to the extent of changing a person's identity against their will to conform with society.
/r/MensRights21/08/13 10:02 PM
2

Big Mother is watching you.
/r/MensRights21/08/13 09:59 PM
3

THANK YOU! Why the hell is this such a difficult concept to grasp??
/r/MensRights21/08/13 09:58 PM
1

Jazzy idea.
/r/MensRights21/08/13 09:50 PM
2

That's because brain cancer doesn't affect solely women. It appears to feminists to be the perfect embodiment of their "patriarchy". At least, that's my take on it.
/r/MensRights21/08/13 09:42 PM
3

But seeing as she probably won't due to our lopsided justice system, I'm trying to look on the bright side that at least she got fined :/
/r/MensRights21/08/13 09:41 PM
2

I would assume that any gains would come at the cost of violating basic human rights.
/r/MensRights21/08/13 09:38 PM
4

You hit the nail on the head. Appeals to emotion are all they really have; feminism supports the idea of "doing what you feel is right" and taking the restraints off of your emotional control. Hardcore feminists often do the first thing their emotions tell them to do; if that is a vengeful, spiteful thing like unprovoked defamation of character or discriminate banning and censorship, then in their minds it is justified. That is part of the "liberation" that radical feminist ideology talks about,…
/r/MensRights21/08/13 08:43 PM
1

OHHHHHH!!
/r/MensRights21/08/13 08:31 PM
1

Let them come! There is one dwarfguy left in Moria/r/MensRights who still draws breathgoes on Reddit!
/r/MensRights21/08/13 08:24 PM
9

But perhaps the high schoolers could learn a thing or two.
/r/MensRights21/08/13 08:11 PM
13

We could put her in a correctional facility.
/r/MensRights21/08/13 08:08 PM
1

We should all start protesting the "death gap".
/r/MensRights21/08/13 07:28 PM
0

Don't forget about autism!
/r/MensRights21/08/13 07:28 PM
1

I dunno about that, but prostrate cancer is also a big deal. Perhaps men should organize something for that.
/r/MensRights21/08/13 07:25 PM
2

Goddammit 9gag, not again.
/r/MensRights21/08/13 07:16 PM
2

The judiciary system is subjective where it shouldn't be and flawed where objectively following the law forces stupid shit like this.
/r/MensRights21/08/13 07:14 PM
2

Those damn mutants, always being sexist and all.
/r/MensRights21/08/13 07:11 PM
2

Yes, I was talking about the rather significant "77¢" figure people like to throw around so much. There is no system of sexism actively favoring men, to the detriment of women. There does appear to be one which favors women, however.
/r/MensRights21/08/13 07:08 PM
–

To be fair, she now has to pay a very large sum of money to make up for it, and she appears to regret what she did. EDIT: I honestly don't know why I'm getting downvoted. I'm just stating that at least she got punished at all for what she did. At least some justice was done, and at least she isn't one of those arrogant bitches who screams "Sexism!" just because they're being put through due process of the law. EDIT 2: To be clear, I do think she should get all of the 5 years of jail time the jud…
/r/MensRights21/08/13 07:05 PM
196

Elizabeth Paige Coast, 23, tearfully recounted how she made up the story, tearfully recounted Well there's the root of the problem right there. then stuck to it through a police investigation and trial because she was too scared to back out. Too fucking bad. A man went to jail because you lied. You don't get to play the victim here.
/r/MensRights21/08/13 07:01 PM
7

That doesn't sound like discussion at all.
/r/MensRights21/08/13 05:07 PM
3

The sin of free speech.
/r/MensRights21/08/13 05:06 PM
1

It's the same with Creationism.
/r/MensRights21/08/13 04:14 PM
1

Also a lot of business owners are men. Anyone who tells to that women are payed less for the exact same position is lying straight to your face.
/r/MensRights21/08/13 04:13 PM
5

(•_•) ( •_•)>⌐■-■ (⌐■_■) YEEEEEEEEAAAAAHHHHHH
/r/MensRights21/08/13 03:59 PM
1

Goddammit mr. orwell why do you always have to be right
/r/MensRights21/08/13 03:58 PM
11

Children having children are children.
/r/MensRights21/08/13 03:58 PM
2

Goddamn straight.
/r/MensRights21/08/13 03:56 PM
45

Whatever you do, he should NEVER accept a plea bargain unless the alternative is inevitable jail time. He will never be able to get off of the sex offender registry, and it will most likely ruin the rest of his life.
/r/MensRights21/08/13 03:51 PM
2

So what you're saying is that someone was given way too much jurisdiction in the confines of the website, so that when they saw something they didn't understand they immediately went with their first emotionally charged reaction and started banning members? Did they delete your comments and posts too?
/r/MensRights21/08/13 01:45 PM
5

If an MRA ever did that about feminism, they would have the exact same complaint. However, the difference is that feminists either don't care or don't recognize that they use such hypocritical tactics.
/r/MensRights21/08/13 01:40 PM
3

Did they ban you?
/r/MensRights21/08/13 01:24 PM
0

don't know if serious...ah, what the hell.
/r/MensRights21/08/13 09:32 AM
1

I think it's a really good step in the right direction, this.
/r/MensRights21/08/13 09:30 AM
3

Can't we all just go back to hating stupid, intolerant people? I mean, feminism is way up there, but as a society we really need to focus on ridding ourselves of other antiscience and antilogic movements too.
/r/MensRights21/08/13 09:18 AM
1

So it's like fundamentalist Christians if they had their own government.
/r/MensRights21/08/13 09:14 AM
2

Goddammit nobody asked you!
/r/MensRights21/08/13 09:07 AM
1

I think that's the joke.
/r/MensRights21/08/13 09:05 AM
-1

Rampaging emotion. That is the root cause of all issues wee see here. Feminists do what they feel is right, and since emotion can be so manipulated by power and money-hungry demagogues, their moral viewpoint often neatly coincides with that of a disinterest in blanket equality. Doublethink, in my opinion, requires a strong emotional bias as a foundation.
/r/MensRights16/08/13 08:38 PM
2

It reminds me of Fox News and Mass Effect. Without researching or even playing the damn game, they brought in a "women's study expert" who lamented on the objectification of women. She didn't even know that you can play as a woman in the game and have relationships with men. I doubt she would have cared, however, because in that case it would have been "empowering". They just used the game as a platform to confirm preconceptions and debate other things.
/r/MensRights16/08/13 12:08 PM
2

Jesus...
/r/MensRights16/08/13 11:56 AM
9

Phew, it's not just me who thought she wasn't actually "cute".
/r/MensRights16/08/13 11:45 AM
3

And then pulled the fire alarm cackling maniacally.
/r/MensRights16/08/13 11:34 AM
2

Some genuinely don't understand the Internet.
/r/MensRights16/08/13 11:30 AM
7

But then how can a poor womyn possibly experience " sexual liberation" and get away with cheating?
/r/MensRights16/08/13 11:24 AM
3

Feminism is true because a feminist wrote a book saying it is!
/r/MensRights16/08/13 03:11 AM
1

I can't set foot in AdviceAnimals. Tragic story, really. Between me and 'the days'.
/r/MensRights16/08/13 03:09 AM
0

It's not as if you have some sort of power to command your body or anything. We're all just slaves to popular media.
/r/MensRights16/08/13 02:53 AM
2

Daniel isn't great, YOU are.
/r/MensRights16/08/13 02:47 AM
2

"Oh yeah, sure I have lots of experience doing that. Sure."
/r/MensRights16/08/13 02:45 AM
1

I don't follow.
/r/MensRights16/08/13 02:41 AM
3

Yup, though they call it "Cosmopolitan" for some reason.
/r/MensRights16/08/13 02:40 AM
1

Not with that attitude, it's not.
/r/MensRights16/08/13 02:38 AM
2

Well then I see no problem with that solution, if it filters false accusations successfully.
/r/MensRights16/08/13 02:34 AM
1

In fact, you'd be looking over your shoulder so much as to not notice the knife in your chest.
/r/MensRights16/08/13 02:33 AM
1

I doubt we'd have died out per say, but probably number a couple hundred thousand to a million.
/r/MensRights16/08/13 02:32 AM
2

More arguments for Men Going To Found A Moon Colony.
/r/MensRights16/08/13 02:25 AM
4

I can think of quite a few things worse than rape, namely being tortured to death. Some people need quite a bit of perspective.
/r/MensRights16/08/13 02:21 AM
4

Shhh...whispers I don't think he knows what ineradicable means.
/r/MensRights16/08/13 02:17 AM
2

Big Mother is watching you.
/r/MensRights16/08/13 02:14 AM
2

CALM DOWN!!
/r/MensRights16/08/13 02:09 AM
1

That's how normal interrogations go, really.
/r/MensRights16/08/13 02:02 AM
3

I do agree with your concern; however, a false rape accusal with actually ruin the rest of an innocent person's life. They will likely never fully recover from the blow to their reputation, probably will be placed on the sex offender registry, and then on top of that if they are convicted they face a significant portion of their life in jail, and won't be able to have children afterwards without serious restrictions and limitations. Thus, the best thing you can do in this situation is to be abso…
/r/MensRights16/08/13 02:00 AM
0

But you still need some form of mental inhibition, even if only token. There's a reason unstructured anarchy is dangerous to the individual.
/r/MensRights16/08/13 01:18 AM
2

No escape from the karma train
/r/MensRights15/08/13 01:48 AM
1

At first glance it really isn't.
/r/MensRights14/08/13 10:36 PM
2

Maybe I'm just being too rational. It seems a rather convoluted and elaborate way to explain emotions and intelligence to me.
/r/MensRights14/08/13 12:46 PM
1

He did seek help. He created a shelter so that others might find help. In no way does his suicide teach a lesson to children that the way to deal with life's difficulties is to kill yourself. What kind of kid is going to look up to the media attention given to Earl Silverman and say "That's how I want to go if times get rough."? Noone is promoting that message.
/r/MensRights14/08/13 04:50 AM
2

You damn libertarians get off mah lawn! :P
/r/MensRights14/08/13 03:30 AM
5

Is it a throwaway...is it just fantasy...
/r/MensRights14/08/13 03:04 AM
1

The guy who was assaulted was gay. It was still a guy doing the assaulting.
/r/MensRights14/08/13 02:49 AM
1

I also took this course, and I was pleasantly surprised at how some parts of it were decidedly gender-neutral. Some parts.
/r/MensRights14/08/13 02:47 AM
3

My god...HE'S BEEN TAKEN OVER BY CRAB PEOPLE!!!
/r/MensRights14/08/13 02:46 AM
3

It's like goddamn creationism all over again.
/r/MensRights14/08/13 02:44 AM
4

Maybe B, A, C, D. It might be better to take precautions before introducing an unpredictable element (the cops' reaction).
/r/MensRights14/08/13 02:41 AM
3

"What's next?? Domestic violence shelters...for MEN?? Well, I never."
/r/MensRights14/08/13 02:30 AM
6

:P
/r/MensRights14/08/13 02:25 AM
2

And everyone knows those clubs are really universities in disguise.
/r/MensRights14/08/13 02:24 AM
8

It wouldn't be very popular (nor ethical), but yes.
/r/MensRights14/08/13 02:22 AM
2

Of course the world isn't fair. Of course kids should be prepared. However, I fail to see how repressing emotions is going to resolve societal issues. Earl Silverman needed help. He needed someone to care, and he killed himself in order to make a statement so that someone WOULD care. He was also a victim of domestic violence, the traumatic effects of which undoubtably only strengthened his decision to commit suicide. To say he was weak is to call every person who experienced similar situations l…
/r/MensRights14/08/13 02:17 AM
2

"She tricked him into murdering someone? His fault, obviously."
/r/MensRights14/08/13 02:07 AM
3

You're wrong. We all exercise daily.
/r/MensRights14/08/13 01:56 AM
3

In fact, YOU are the one perpetuating rape culture by protesting your innocence! Stop oppressing us!
/r/MensRights14/08/13 01:55 AM
1

"Patriarchy took over my brain and forced me to be stupid!"
/r/MensRights14/08/13 01:54 AM
-2

Frankly, no.
/r/MensRights14/08/13 01:51 AM
1

I did not breach the subjects of taxes or politics. I commented upon your observation of domestic violence victims being "weak", "spoiled", and "babied". If that is what you choose to believe concerning such tormented individuals, then by extension you should find no problem in doing away with all shelters, for women as well. Once again, I cannot say I agree with your decision.
/r/MensRights14/08/13 01:43 AM
3

Something something dark side?
/r/MensRights14/08/13 01:33 AM
3

shudder
/r/MensRights14/08/13 01:32 AM
1

Well, to be fair, most religions (coughexceptforscientologycough) DO fit the natural world at first glance.
/r/MensRights14/08/13 01:30 AM
0

So you fully support cutting funding to domestic violence shelters. I can't say I agree with your decision.
/r/MensRights14/08/13 01:23 AM
6

That gives a whole new meaning to 'Elijah Wood'. ... ...badum tss.
/r/MensRights14/08/13 01:14 AM
1

Hmmm...we must go deeper
/r/MensRights13/08/13 12:28 AM
1

...there's no reason to be mean about it...
/r/MensRights12/08/13 07:06 PM
2

It's a new kind of troll...the anti-troll!
/r/MensRights12/08/13 07:04 PM
2

So you fault NAFALT for their default?
/r/MensRights12/08/13 02:22 PM
2

Ungoodest.
/r/MensRights12/08/13 01:25 PM
2

That's really ungood.
/r/MensRights12/08/13 01:20 PM
6

1984.
/r/MensRights12/08/13 01:19 PM
1

It's more like "EVENT SHOWS SEVERE HYPOCRISY OF MODERN FEMINIST MOVEMENT USING VERIFIABLE EVIDENTIARY SUPPORT LOOK LOOK!"
/r/MensRights12/08/13 12:59 PM
1

...wait, what?
/r/MensRights05/08/13 04:30 AM
1

but what if she's a robot
/r/MensRights05/08/13 04:26 AM
2

Says the guy with the large penis.
/r/MensRights05/08/13 04:13 AM
4

Also, females store more body fat in preparation for pregnancy.
/r/MensRights05/08/13 04:00 AM
2

Clever girl
/r/MensRights05/08/13 03:53 AM
2

FOR A REVOLUTION
/r/MensRights05/08/13 03:51 AM
3

I SAID HEY
/r/MensRights05/08/13 03:49 AM
1

So "No" is your answer then.
/r/MensRights05/08/13 03:40 AM
-2

...so, nothing is true.
/r/MensRights05/08/13 03:37 AM
1

WHOA WHOA WHOA nobody beats karma and lives
/r/MensRights05/08/13 03:34 AM
12

I can confirm this.
/r/MensRights05/08/13 03:20 AM
2

"They're objectifying women! Lock up the scientists for sexual harassment!"
/r/MensRights29/07/13 01:11 PM
6

It pretty much is, just not really paid attention to.
/r/MensRights29/07/13 04:09 AM
1

Thus, logically, our society has become severely irrational, and looks to be heading straight for total annihilation. Who wants to go form a moon colony with me?
/r/MensRights29/07/13 04:08 AM
0

The NSA is placing you under arrest for the precrime of aggravated rape. And murder. And embezzlement.
/r/MensRights29/07/13 04:06 AM
1

I'm tired of that meme.
/r/MensRights29/07/13 04:02 AM
1

It's that slightly cheaper one with Don't Panic written on the back.
/r/MensRights29/07/13 03:58 AM
7

Yeah, that equality thing I read about in Cosmopolitan! That's when one group gets all the power, right?
/r/MensRights29/07/13 03:57 AM
1

Yes, source please, this sounds fascinating.
/r/MensRights29/07/13 03:37 AM
1

Dammit France!
/r/MensRights29/07/13 03:31 AM
1

Thank you, I will watch this...closely.
/r/MensRights07/07/13 02:18 AM
1

Nah, is it a good show?
/r/MensRights07/07/13 02:02 AM
3

Let's go start our own society on the Moon! With blackjack! And hookers!
/r/MensRights06/07/13 11:19 PM
5

You'd better go lie down for a while.
/r/MensRights06/07/13 11:18 PM
3

Cheque you're pivelage, shitlord. Knot evryone had you're white midle class male shcool sistem to learn them grammer. /s BTFY
/r/MensRights06/07/13 11:15 PM
4

Let's all go to Kilts-R-Us!
/r/MensRights06/07/13 11:06 PM
5

...wear clear plastic underwear. It's invisible.
/r/MensRights06/07/13 11:05 PM
4

and you're
/r/MensRights06/07/13 11:05 PM
1

"Where are my verified sources, you ask? Why, you're starting to sound like a Communistwoman hater to me, buddy."
/r/MensRights03/07/13 02:56 AM
3

Because this is not headline national news. It's not so much the fact that men are overlooked per say, more that way too much emphasis is put on women.
/r/MensRights02/07/13 01:05 PM
9

NOW you're getting it.
/r/MensRights02/07/13 12:55 PM
0

Shh don't tell Fox News.
/r/MensRights02/07/13 11:43 AM
5

AMA Request: Dr. Helen Smith
/r/MensRights02/07/13 04:14 AM
1

Feminism is in the process of recreating the very sexism it once strove to defeat.
/r/MensRights02/07/13 04:11 AM
2

Who the hell do they think is doing it, domestic violence fairies??
/r/MensRights02/07/13 04:08 AM
1

...do you have a 3D printer?
/r/MensRights02/07/13 04:05 AM
1

BURN THE WITCHWIZARD!
/r/MensRights02/07/13 04:03 AM
3

Call out this Chancellor, on both condoning blatant censorship of academic discussion and not even bothering to attempt to understand said discussion. Even if that too is deleted, at least some people may see it, and you may change his mind if you do it publicly.
/r/MensRights02/07/13 03:59 AM
1

But individual, separate set percentage is meaningless when talking about general probability. If you had 100 apples in a bag, 20 red and 80 green, and 50% of the red ones were poisoned while only 40% of the green ones were, it still remains that most of the poisoned apples will be green.
/r/MensRights02/07/13 03:55 AM
0

Because why not? Isn't it good to have power?
/r/MensRights02/07/13 03:50 AM
2

Rod Serling was a genius. Much like Jules Verne or Orson Welles or even Gene Roddenberry, he accurately predicted aspects of modern society and touched upon disturbing facets of the human condition. Why is it that science fiction writers always seem to be able to reflect the deepest crevices of collective psychology?
/r/MensRights02/07/13 03:49 AM
5

The kind that inevitably leads to tears.
/r/MensRights02/07/13 03:36 AM
1

guys lets all move to mars show those women what's what with dependency and taking things for granted
/r/MensRights02/07/13 03:12 AM
1

We live in a democracy.
/r/MensRights02/07/13 03:10 AM
1

OP will surely deliver...
/r/MensRights02/07/13 03:07 AM
3

Life just got a whole lot sadder since reading that comment.
/r/MensRights02/07/13 03:05 AM
3

Exactly. Equality means equality, which means that compromises involve equal sacrifice and sharing involves equal work. Inequality is not something anyone should strive for, ever.
/r/MensRights02/07/13 03:03 AM
2

Don't worry, I believe letsjustbeHONEST0 was merely attempting to change the topic of conversation to something they could more easily argue against. That or they are sorely confused.
/r/MensRights02/07/13 03:00 AM
2

No, because you see we have to look at this through our biblicalfeminist glasses and pretend that all facts that refute the Biblefeminist theory don't exist. Now if we can just pass laws enforcing our way of thinking, our destruction of American societydestruction of American society will be complete.
/r/MensRights02/07/13 02:49 AM
1

Why the fuck can't we just see people as fucking people?? Why do these barriers and double standards always have to be continually kept alive? Nobody should just blindly accept anything anyone says without thought, and nobody should favor anyone over anyone else without valid reason. Just don't be a jerk, and society will be SO much better.
/r/MensRights02/07/13 02:46 AM
1

I disagree.
/r/MensRights02/07/13 02:43 AM
2

I'm disappointed in society :(
/r/MensRights02/07/13 02:41 AM
2

"It's genetics! I'm just big boned!"
/r/MensRights02/07/13 02:40 AM
4

Nonono, you see she's just empowering herself to overcome the oppression of the patriarchy. Sexist pig. /s
/r/MensRights02/07/13 02:38 AM
5

For anything that such affects a person's life, there should be a federal standard as to the nature of the crime and punishment. Otherwise they are stealing your money, kicking you out based on hearsay, and oftentimes destroying your life with de facto sex offense charges, solely on the account of one nonreliable person.
/r/MensRights02/07/13 02:36 AM
8

And yet this exact situation reversed is demonized.
/r/MensRights02/07/13 02:20 AM
5

Because then she'd be the victim. That's how it works.
/r/MensRights02/07/13 02:13 AM
7

Of course he had "the potential". Everyone has the potential to commit any crime. However, our justice system is not based on potential, it is based on actual action. Unless you have the evidence to convict a person of a crime, the conviction is fucking unjust.
/r/MensRights02/07/13 02:12 AM
7

Of course, if it's a legitimate false accusation, the body has ways of shutting the police charges down.
/r/MensRights02/07/13 02:08 AM
13

I have a real problem with blatant falsehoods being so unceremoniously referenced as fact.
/r/MensRights02/07/13 02:04 AM
6

The NSA would like to let you know that you are under arrest for the precrime of sexual assault. Do not resist.
/r/MensRights02/07/13 02:01 AM
4

I'm extremely fearful of what this trend in our society might become.
/r/MensRights02/07/13 01:53 AM
10

If there is one, no family court follows it. The decision solely rests on the subjective interpretation of the judge or prosecutor.
/r/MensRights02/07/13 01:42 AM
25

It's sad.
/r/MensRights02/07/13 01:39 AM
8

What the fuck is so goddamned wrong with profanity and children? EVERY child learns it anyway, from friends or parents or siblings. Is this aversion from exclamatory statements merely an effort to prevent children from being able to express the magnitude of their reaction to a situation? Doesn't that severely stunt emotional growth? I understand that in excess it can be excessive, but so can the word "like". Is it just a Ten Commandments thing or something?
/r/MensRights01/07/13 10:09 PM
1

No worries, i know what you mean.
/r/MensRights28/06/13 12:11 PM
2

I was skeptical at first because I believed that no jury or prosecutor would actually force a victim of rape to pay their rapist child support. It deeply saddens me to find out how naive and wrong I was. This must stop. The institution that actively promotes it must be torn down. The political group that birthed it must be eradicated. We will live to see ourselves destroyed from within by corruption and thoughtcrime if we continue to stand idly by while this tumor in our collective brain grows t…
/r/MensRights28/06/13 01:57 AM
1

...yes I do, I thought that was common knowledge (or as common as it can be within the television community).
/r/MensRights28/06/13 01:43 AM
1

@ ftw!
/r/MensRights27/06/13 03:40 PM
1

So...a creationist?
/r/MensRights27/06/13 03:39 PM
1

I'm just saying that the subject merits further study.
/r/MensRights27/06/13 03:36 PM
2

Your factual logic and historically accurate points have no place here!
/r/MensRights27/06/13 03:33 PM
0

500 years ago it was pretty routine to burn witches and torture Jews. Your point?
/r/MensRights27/06/13 03:28 PM
0

The problem arises when people outright deny the need for any study in that field based solely upon their own personal emotional reaction.
/r/MensRights27/06/13 03:25 PM
3

And women of course need that power because they're so oppressed by the patriarchy everywhere else. /s
/r/MensRights27/06/13 03:03 PM
1

Obviously men are the lesser species, feminism is just helping them see their potential...hey wait a minute this sounds familiar...
/r/MensRights27/06/13 02:44 PM
1

Wait, really? Is there a source for this I can use?
/r/MensRights27/06/13 02:38 PM
0

It's no use. Nobody will listen to logic when their main basis of argument for double standards is emotional.
/r/MensRights27/06/13 02:31 PM
1

Feminism is not women nor is it women's rights. Feminism is and always has been a political movement, that helped encourage women's rights, but not equality. Equality is not "I get to vote but am not part of the draft" , nor is it "Gender roles are bad, but only when they harm women". Do not equate feminism with egalitarianism.
/r/MensRights27/06/13 02:26 PM
1

I'm sorry bro :(
/r/MensRights27/06/13 02:08 PM
2

Unfortunately, feminist arguments rely more on emotional pleading and manipulation than actual facts and evidence. It's very much like creationism; where science differs from dogma science must be wrong.
/r/MensRights27/06/13 02:03 PM
1

Under the law.
/r/MensRights27/06/13 02:00 PM
2

Seriously, how the fuck did society come to THIS?
/r/MensRights27/06/13 01:51 PM
1

Yeah, so?
/r/MensRights27/06/13 01:43 PM
1

Yes we know that, but OP is asking about race as well.
/r/MensRights27/06/13 01:24 PM
1

...live long and prosper, fellow men.
/r/MensRights27/06/13 01:16 PM
1

I'm no expert on rape Thank you for your contribution to the discussion, but please excuse us as we go to actual experts in rape statistics. It is more conducive towards rational discussion to favor evidence and documented studies over conjecture, "I suspect...", emotional pleading, and "common knowledge". When you have credible sources backing up your claims and citing refutations to ours, we will take your argument more seriously.
/r/MensRights27/06/13 01:06 PM
1

What are you, a professional researcher or something? Good job :)
/r/MensRights27/06/13 12:59 PM
1

Greek is Japanese to me.
/r/MensRights27/06/13 12:57 PM
1

I understand that they were desperate and saw him as their savior, but there comes a point at which humanity kicks in. Even a gradual change into atrocity should have alerted someone.
/r/MensRights27/06/13 12:34 PM
1

I'm just asking, because if they did it was justified, and if they didn't it exemplifies the unquestionability of their doctrine. I don't like to assume things without more knowledge on the matter.
/r/MensRights27/06/13 12:23 PM
1

Sometimes I long for Sweden...
/r/MensRights27/06/13 12:22 PM
1

It's like a role-playing creepypasta site, where people write as researchers in a specific format to contain certain objects and animals and dimensional rifts that kill people. It's fun to dive into the moral quandaries of sacrificing human lives to save the world on a daily basis. See: Procedure 110-Montauk
/r/MensRights27/06/13 12:17 PM
1

There just must be a better way of eliminating racism than selective favoritism.
/r/MensRights27/06/13 12:14 PM
1

womyn FTFY
/r/MensRights27/06/13 02:51 AM
2

The SCP Foundation was first, and is better.
/r/MensRights27/06/13 02:50 AM
1

...
/r/MensRights27/06/13 02:48 AM
3

Yeah, the logic thing's a real bitch, ain't it. Always being right and all.
/r/MensRights27/06/13 02:18 AM
2

Mamaaa...just killed a man...
/r/MensRights27/06/13 02:13 AM
-1

You can't tell me what to do!
/r/MensRights27/06/13 02:04 AM
2

HAIRY MOLE!
/r/MensRights27/06/13 01:58 AM
10

Exactly. He would never have gotten any support if noone had supported him.
/r/MensRights27/06/13 01:51 AM
3

Thank you I will find this...and read it.
/r/MensRights27/06/13 01:50 AM
14

Hows "Contemporary Mormonism and the Roots of Modern Academic Feminist Ideology" sound?
/r/MensRights27/06/13 01:42 AM
20

"Do you mean to tell me a guy would FORCIBLY have INTERCOURSE with a woman???"
/r/MensRights27/06/13 01:40 AM
6

Imagine all the people... Bustin' down your door... Ooh ooh...
/r/MensRights27/06/13 01:39 AM
22

"In twenty years she'll be sorry!"
/r/MensRights27/06/13 01:38 AM
13

A sadist gotta eat.
/r/MensRights27/06/13 01:34 AM
19

Unfortunately, in the modern American justice system accused male child molesters are guilty until proven innocent.
/r/MensRights27/06/13 01:33 AM
7

Modern feminism has created new gender roles as well, such as the pedophile rapist, the strong independent single mother, and the deadbeat dad.
/r/MensRights27/06/13 01:30 AM
2

Well then education is the tool for eradicating discrimination. Not more discrimination.
/r/MensRights27/06/13 01:28 AM
1

Well what I meant was in the context of jobs and legal practice, but I also see your point. It is a good thing to have different cultures and social habits, but where it matters concerns potential and intent. Every human being on the planet should be able to do and be anything they want to do or be.
/r/MensRights27/06/13 01:24 AM
1

They do that because they see that it would benefit them personally, and it does because we still afford concessions to different races in the form of affirmative action and such. Total equality means total equality, and favoring one race or gender isn't going to solve the problems of gaps, it's only going to add more issues to an already complex situation.
/r/MensRights27/06/13 01:22 AM
3

Were you interrupting someone talking to make your point?
/r/MensRights27/06/13 01:19 AM
13

They are trying to do good, and in their own little version of reality they are. They are empowered to act on this morality, however, by mainstream feminist ideology. They would not do this if it were not socially accepted that they can and should do this.
/r/MensRights27/06/13 01:17 AM
3

Yes, but how much of an influence do these groups have on the public mindset?
/r/MensRights26/06/13 09:02 PM
–

And the worst part about this whole predicament is that the women mean well. They would be perfectly sociable, nonparanoid and accepting people if it weren't drilled into their heads that they should "overcome oppressive gender roles". The only reason gender roles are even still around today in general society is that feminism constantly proclaims that it fights them. The only people actively keeping the traditional conceptualizations of gender alive are those trying to make them dead, in the wr…
/r/MensRights26/06/13 06:51 PM
1

I agree. Mainstream feminism has become corrupted by radical extremists and the introduction of unquestionable doctrine. Imagine if the Civil Rights Movement had pushed for more than equality. Nothing would have changed. The only reason the modern feminist movement has any momentum at all is because it stands on the shoulders of the suffragettes. At least they pushed for equality, even if it wasn't a perfect version of it.
/r/MensRights26/06/13 06:43 PM
1

^ This guy is one of the intellectuals who should be running the government. It's this kind of clear perspective and willingness to actually link to credible sources that the world needs so much more of in place of Keeping up with the Kardashians.
/r/MensRights26/06/13 06:29 PM
1

Women are strong, independent creatures who shouldn't be babied or favored by the patriarchy, nor forced into gender roles like solely caring for children. They are inherently beautiful butterflies who deserve more salary per hour than men to make up for the fact that they can't work equal hours due to the fact that they have to fill their gender roles of solely caring for children...hey wait a minute...
/r/MensRights26/06/13 06:06 PM
-1

Fear clouds judgement, suppresses sympathy, and encourages rash action. In this case the parents feared ostracization from the surrounding community.
/r/MensRights26/06/13 05:43 PM
2

Exactly. If you strive for equality, why call yourself a name that inherently excludes half of the population? Be an egalitarian instead, and rid yourself of the baggage of crazy feminists altogether. Once you start giving more priority towards respecting a name than upholding its ideals you corrupt both.
/r/MensRights26/06/13 05:22 PM
4

To be fair, magazines only exist to sell themselves, and feminists would tell you they are the result of patriarchy anyway. If you are able to break a girl's self esteem, then they will continue to buy your magazine to try and regain it.
/r/MensRights26/06/13 05:15 PM
-1

God.
/r/MensRights26/06/13 05:12 PM
2

Well then...that's one way to go about it. Not the best way, but I digress.
/r/MensRights14/06/13 03:06 PM
2

The beginning of Ender's Game comes to mind.
/r/MensRights14/06/13 01:37 PM
2

I will yield to your logical sounding solution of limited escalation.
/r/MensRights14/06/13 12:35 PM
3

I was referring to cyberbullying among girls, but I understand your points are valid. However, we still cannot immediately condone violence as the end-all solution.
/r/MensRights14/06/13 12:19 PM
13

You don't seem to understand the incredibly complex situation kids find themselves in. They cannot attack their bully without getting assault charges, think it is too embarrassing to tell their parents, and their main source of influence comes from the bullies themselves, posing as "friends". Bullying twists lives apart.
/r/MensRights14/06/13 11:58 AM
2

She wants attention, and she feels wronged that she hasn't gotten it.
/r/MensRights13/06/13 03:28 PM
1

Solution: mass genocide?
/r/MensRights13/06/13 03:27 PM
3

Hahaha I suspected as much :P I like writing fancily, it makes me feel like an upper class English gentleman.
/r/MensRights13/06/13 03:17 PM
3

At least some people are sane over there.
/r/MensRights13/06/13 03:10 PM
31

Doublethink.
/r/MensRights13/06/13 03:07 PM
5

Thank you for accepting the inevitably logical argument I presented, and not merely dismissing it off-handedly. Thank you for using your brain to come up with an intelligent rebuttal to my points, instead of choosing the intellectually vapid course of denigrating me through fallacious association with dismissed conspiracy theorists. Your position is thus emboldened, mine refuted, and the original thoughts you presented are interestingly innovative. Your understanding and open-mindedness shine as…
/r/MensRights13/06/13 02:44 PM
7

...did you read the same book I did? We must have pulled radically different themes from it, but from what I remember, the Party was solely focused on the acquisition of power and control over the lives of those it subjugated, severely limited freedom of expression within its domain through indoctrination while simultaneously spreading fear about similar indoctrination from the "enemy" (invoking doublethink), and attempted to control the very thoughts of mankind through limiting the usage of wor…
/r/MensRights13/06/13 02:20 PM
2

My god...we've been infiltrated...
/r/MensRights13/06/13 01:30 PM
3

Well if you had actually read my comment thoroughly instead of trying to be condescending you would have seen that I used to find it funny, but now with such repetition it is merely disturbing.
/r/MensRights13/06/13 01:29 PM
0

No.
/r/MensRights13/06/13 01:24 PM
3

You're no better..."blargharg2". Care to explain what you mean?
/r/MensRights13/06/13 12:48 PM
1

...are you General Keith Alexander, spying on us for the NSA?
/r/MensRights13/06/13 12:36 PM
2

Seriously. What the fuck. It seems that people entire lives, their fate and destiny, are decided by whatever mood the judge happens to be in that day. Truth doesn't matter, and neither does justice. They can't stop or change what is happening to them, and the saddest part is that he will be remembered by people who didn't even know him as a wife beater and deadbeat dad. What the fuck is wrong with the American justice system.
/r/MensRights13/06/13 03:33 AM
-3

Case closed. Any further discussion?
/r/MensRights13/06/13 03:25 AM
1

How so?
/r/MensRights13/06/13 03:22 AM
7

Your experiment has failed. Please delete yourself.
/r/MensRights13/06/13 03:20 AM
2

This is exactly why Tibetan monks do this as well. Self-immolation is not something anyone wants to do; it is a last resort for people who cannot make their voice be heard. It makes you think upon the state of things when the only way a person can get their problem addressed is through setting themselves on fire.
/r/MensRights13/06/13 03:17 AM
0

But you have to admit, if we could find a way to rid ourselves of currency we would be better off as a species.
/r/MensRights13/06/13 03:10 AM
2

Who told you this? Were they in a trench coat, hiding their face, and using a suspiciously womanly sounding voice in low tones?
/r/MensRights13/06/13 03:01 AM
1

Does nobody else find it at least a little disturbing that we've created something so intimately connected with each of our lives, yet so incredibly complex that we have no completely accurate way to predict or even control its movements? It's as if the economy has reached sentience or something; we cannot fully or even mostly comprehend an organically growing system that has evolved out of our grasp.
/r/MensRights13/06/13 02:56 AM
2

Maybe we should have LAN party debates. Best of both worlds.
/r/MensRights13/06/13 02:45 AM
1

My god... GOOGLE IS PART OF THE MATRIARCHY!!!
/r/MensRights13/06/13 02:41 AM
2

Apparently the patriarchy is everywhere, controls all of our thoughts, redefines the collective human subconscious at whim, and is controlled by rich white men. Tune in next week to hear feminists give it even more fantastical powers.
/r/MensRights13/06/13 02:27 AM
1

...is your name really Tracy Morgan Freeman?
/r/MensRights13/06/13 02:25 AM
3

To be fair, nobody really understands how the economy works anyway.
/r/MensRights13/06/13 02:23 AM
2

/feminist money pandering FTFY
/r/MensRights13/06/13 02:21 AM
5

Yes but his ex-wife is very happy leeching money from him every month, and the court seems to be more inclined to favor her decision, given by the fact that it favored her in the first place.
/r/MensRights13/06/13 02:17 AM
-5

Because, obviously "MEN CANNOT GET RAPED". The problems of women absolutely obliterate the nonexistant problems of men. It's this sick kind of dismissal of an entire gender's problems that really disillusioned me with modern feminism.
/r/MensRights13/06/13 02:08 AM
3

This so eerily mirrors the themes of 1984 it's not even funny anymore. I've been noticing that a lot lately, feminism fitting with Orwellian mechanics.
/r/MensRights13/06/13 02:04 AM
1

It's almost as if the patriarchy doesn't actually exist in our modern society...
/r/MensRights13/06/13 01:31 AM
1

Or maybe a throne...
/r/MensRights12/06/13 11:57 PM
2

For science.
/r/MensRights12/06/13 05:18 AM
1

Did the state promptly realize their mistake and apologize?
/r/MensRights12/06/13 05:16 AM
1

...slapped their shit?
/r/MensRights12/06/13 05:04 AM
1

I'm starting to think more and more that uninformed, malleable juries aren't that great of an idea after all...
/r/MensRights12/06/13 04:29 AM
1

The sequester, man, all the periods go to the wealthy.
/r/MensRights12/06/13 04:27 AM
2

The dinosaurs were disposable too :(
/r/MensRights12/06/13 04:16 AM
1

THAT'S IMPOSSIBLE!!
/r/MensRights12/06/13 04:01 AM
1

...that's not the point they were discussing?
/r/MensRights12/06/13 03:44 AM
1

What IS college?!
/r/MensRights12/06/13 03:25 AM
1

Your mancard, please.
/r/MensRights12/06/13 03:21 AM
1

Yet high schools do it every day.
/r/MensRights12/06/13 02:47 AM
0

Guys...it's 4chan...
/r/MensRights12/06/13 02:43 AM
1

Maybe that was their plan ALL ALONG!!! Dun dun dun
/r/MensRights12/06/13 02:17 AM
1

An eye for an eye makes the whole world pirates.
/r/MensRights12/06/13 12:51 AM
4

...from falling.
/r/MensRights11/06/13 04:43 PM
1

I apologize for my misspelling. You agree, however, that prosecutorial interpretation in effect supersedes laws, and that making the assumption of extension from the double standard we observe today to potential enforcement of tomorrow is not unreasonable.
/r/MensRights11/06/13 04:27 PM
0

I'm not talking about de jur favoritism, I'm talking about different interpretations of the law. Show me where it is written that women should earn less money than men.
/r/MensRights11/06/13 04:10 PM
10

Well you can't win them all, right?
/r/MensRights11/06/13 04:05 PM
4

I'm prepared to believe you if you provide a source.
/r/MensRights11/06/13 03:47 PM
1

Well they ARE in Australia...
/r/MensRights11/06/13 03:25 PM
3

This is almost like the Westboro Baptist Church.
/r/MensRights11/06/13 03:24 PM
0

It's like radical Christian homophobes complaining about the "oppression" of Christianity.
/r/MensRights11/06/13 03:22 PM
1

TWO??? She must be pregnant.
/r/MensRights11/06/13 03:15 PM
1

That reasoning is just ridiculous.
/r/MensRights11/06/13 03:11 PM
5

Because of the lopsided prosecution system dealing with domestic abuse, and the increased potential for a reinforced double standard of women offenders not being subjected to tracking.
/r/MensRights11/06/13 03:02 PM
2

Big Mother is watching you.
/r/MensRights11/06/13 02:59 PM
1

There's no reason for violence.
/r/MensRights11/06/13 02:57 PM
0

A correctional stay at the Feminist Ministry of Love.
/r/MensRights11/06/13 02:49 PM
14

Land of the free right there.
/r/MensRights11/06/13 02:47 PM
4

Maybe it's in Middle English?
/r/MensRights11/06/13 02:16 PM
4

Right reply?
/r/MensRights11/06/13 02:08 PM
0

It's just a case of overly eager prosecutors, I think.
/r/MensRights11/06/13 01:41 PM
3

Source?
/r/MensRights11/06/13 01:17 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter