TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Iamyourmarriage Archive

View 0 posts and 292 comments by Iamyourmarriage on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Do you see the irony.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/15 04:52 AM
1

Seeing as men, on average, have more sexual partners than women, on average, I'd say I'd rather focus on actual problems.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/15 04:46 AM
1

Good. We need less people. And I personally can't stand children, so there's that.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/15 04:45 AM
1

I know this is hyperbole, but seeing as most RPers join TRP because they have a pathetic hard-on for revenge fantasies this wouldn't surprise me.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/15 04:37 AM
1

sigh He could've have just not gone. He had the choice of not going. But no, he had to make a big deal out of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/15 04:34 AM
10

"I'm PC bro, I'll throw down!"
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/15 04:26 AM
1

They are fascinating. It's like listening to a crazy religious person go on and on about God or a small child talk about their imaginary friend. It's cute how completely out of touch they are.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/15 04:18 AM
0

Do you know what suffrage is?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/15 01:08 AM
2

No but fascism mixed with racist and bigoted ideas can easily lead to one.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/15 01:08 AM
2

Then enlighten me.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/15 01:03 AM
4

Last time I checked no men were drafted.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/15 01:00 AM
1

Except the public outrage.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/15 12:56 AM
-3

Great hamstering, bravo.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/15 12:56 AM
4

Yeah, the holocaust was great. /s
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/15 12:55 AM
1

What do you mean? We have a surplus of people willing to fight. We don't need the draft anymore.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/15 12:48 AM
0

Huh, that's funny. I never mentioned feminism once :)
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/15 12:45 AM
5

Then you should protest against it.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/15 12:42 AM
8

Yeah, the draft is a boogie man that they like to trot out whenever women's suffrage is involved as if it proves that women shouldn't vote. If anything, it proves that our society needs to let go of barbaric practices like the draft and that it's complete crap that any man should be forced to sign up.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/15 12:35 AM
1

I'm not retreating. I'm letting you know that you will never be able to convince me otherwise. You are free to waste your breath all you want. you're a bullshit artist. Cry me a river.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/15 12:31 AM
7

Solipsism Hey look, a buzzword with no meaning. Same thing with rough sex. Rough sex and being treated like a flesh light are two different things.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/15 11:15 PM
1

Instead of gracefully parting ways you decide to ad hom. You can tell me you think I'm wrong all day long and it won't change my opinion. It is a kink. That's it. The end.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/15 11:14 PM
1

We're not really going to get anywhere with this so agree to disagree.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/15 11:07 PM
1

What I'm referring to is RPW.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/15 10:53 PM
4

"Equal" relationships are just covertly female run relationships. No. it's addressing the power dynamic in the relationship. It's surrendering all your power to your husband simply because he is a man and hoping he doesnt trade you in once you hit the wall. It is having sex when he wants and complying to all of his demands because women are considered inferior. It is a kink.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/15 10:37 PM
2

In human sexuality, kinkiness or kinky (adjective), is a colloquial term used to describe unconventional sexual practices, concepts or fantasies Yeah it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/15 10:06 PM
6

I'd be pretty upset if my husband talked so much shit about me behind my back :/
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/15 08:34 PM
2

This is such a fucking strawman holy shit. Fucking reported.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/15 08:08 PM
2

Please re-read my reply to you because, again, this has jack-shit to do with anything I was talking about. If you can't form a coherent argument then leave.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/15 07:48 PM
2

I want facts not feelings. The irony is fucking killing me. How can the way history naturally occurred Except that's not how it occurred. Pick up a fucking history book and get off TRP. You're fucking delusional and you're just a like a religious person. Again, the fucking irony. A person who completely rejects logic is calling me fucking delusional. Unbelievable.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/15 07:14 PM
8

No. That doesn't make me orgasm. Why would I, as a self respecting woman, have sex with a man who thinks he's dirty-ing me with is dick? Why would anyone want that? That's fucking gross.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/15 07:01 PM
2

I'm asking you a goddamn question and you have completely refused. I have the entirety of history to back up my assertion as being the status quo. And if you knew anything about history then you'd see you were wrong. This way of organizing the sexes has been unrealistic since the beginning of time and was only feasible by the wealthy up until the 1900s or so. It is inefficient unless you have the technology and the cash that made it feasible. Women didn't sit at home and eat bonbons while taking…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/15 06:41 PM
1

This was excellent thank you :)
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/15 06:17 PM
2

Yes and I saw the opposite. Why do you insist that everything being claimed here is based on some 1950's American fantasy? Because breadwinner man and caretaker woman was practically the focal point in the 1950s and is completely unrealistic.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/15 05:17 PM
2

No, I think labeling things as "masculine" or "feminine" have no roots in biology.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/15 05:15 PM
2

You are still refusing to answer my question.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/15 05:14 PM
3

The general consensus is both polygyny and monogamy. Nothing, your paper just provides examples.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/15 05:09 PM
5

You linked me to a paper where it is completely disputed by researchers and actually provides examples of male hypergamy.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/15 06:33 AM
4

Exactly. Notice how I never mentioned anything about behavior. What I said was: We're the idiots that decided to label and polarize everything As in, we decided what was masculine and what was feminine, not biology. What was masculine in one tribe was feminine in another. What is considered masculine or feminine is completely relative to the time.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/15 06:32 AM
4

It's pretty rare for any two animals in nature to have identical behaviors between the sexes. That's not even what I'm arguing.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/15 06:12 AM
2

Citation please.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/15 06:08 AM
5

If you're going to shift the goal-posts at least be more discrete about it. You asked me to find a successful matriarchal society and then harped on about female leadership. This literally had nothing to do with my original question. You refusing to answer it brings me to the conclusion that you do in fact believe that breadwinner man and caretaker woman is the way the sexes have always organized themselves. In which case I advise you to pick up a history book so that you don't embarrass yoursel…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/15 06:07 AM
2

What are you going on about?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/15 05:59 AM
0

Again, this has literally nothing to do with my question. This is a red-herring.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/15 05:58 AM
6

Pretty much. They are basically upset that they can't treat women like shit anymore. That's the root of the problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/15 05:47 AM
6

Literally has nothing to do with my question. Try again.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/15 05:46 AM
4

Are you seriously under the assumption that breadwinner man and caretaker woman was the way the sexes have always organized themselves?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/15 05:38 AM
7

They'd pitch a fit if they realized that most of them would be condemned to manual labor with unfit working conditions. They just can't adapt and are lashing out.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/15 05:33 AM
3

Referring to your husband as "Captain", not being able to establish any boundaries in your relationship because you don't want to come off as a nagging harpy bitch of a wife, and trying to emulate behaviors that only existed in 1950's housewives sounds pretty kink-like.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/15 05:31 AM
6

It's funny how it all just boils down to some pathetic revenge fantasy that'll never come true.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/15 05:27 AM
7

You didn't provide a citation or any proof to your claim and then pitched a fit, but somehow I'm the llama. Riiiiiiight.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/15 05:20 AM
5

You tried, hard
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/15 05:18 AM
1

You tried
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/15 05:17 AM
10

So no citation, got it.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/15 05:14 AM
8

Traditional gender roles exist because they are BASED ON BIOLOGY "Traditional gender roles" is a concept that is constantly changing with the times. You guys seem to believe that almost all of human history was exactly like the 1950s. "Based on biology" means jack shit when the only thing biology wants is reproduction. I believe all women could benefit from the knowledge on RPW No thanks.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/15 05:13 AM
6

Citation please.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/15 05:00 AM
12

Nope. I just know that women weren't made from some douchbag's rib.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/15 04:59 AM
20

Adam & Eve. Adam and Eve weren't real. Edit: I'm seriously getting downvoted for this? Lmao xD
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/15 04:52 AM
4

And what science would that be?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/15 04:50 AM
5

Who says everything has to be social programming. Anthropology and sociology gives plenty of insight.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/15 04:48 AM
11

Oh so you're a bible thumper. Can't say I'm surprised.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/15 04:46 AM
6

I don't see why its so bad to hold beliefs about male and female differences in biology though. I never said there was anything wrong with it. If biology intended women to be feminine Biology didn't intend for anyone to be anything outside of reproduction. We're the idiots that decided to label and polarize everything.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/15 04:45 AM
5

Yes, they dislike it because of the lack of respect between the sub and the Dom. In a BDSM relationship, the Dom is only the Dom until the safe word is spoken. The sub isnt inferior to the Dom and the Dom doesnt consider him or her to be. There is respect. In an RP relationship, there are no safe words, the respect is barely there and not only does the Dom have to be a role specifically taken by a man (because you're a lowly beta cuck otherwise) the Dom considers the sub to be inferior (or as th…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/15 04:35 AM
1

I try.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/15 04:20 AM
9

My objection lies within the notion that what they do is natural or what nature intended. It's a kink. You don't see BDSM people making bs science claims about how their relationship style is the most optimal and how relationships should be.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/15 04:15 AM
6

And men will have no choice but to marry who their parents say. It's a win win. I guess that ruins your perfect virgin waifu dream huh :/
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/15 03:46 AM
6

It's also worth it because men will have to walk on separate sides of the street when women are present and husbands will finally be devoted to their wives :) not to mention women will no longer have to be judged for their outward appearance oh and no street harassers
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/15 03:38 AM
5

You wont see any skinny girls in yoga pants either though :/
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/15 03:06 AM
5

I have a husband silly :P
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/15 03:04 AM
1

Muslim invaders outbreed them I am glad I am helping them out by opting out in not having my body completely destroyed by another, more obnoxious, human being :)
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/15 02:48 AM
2

Is this guy forreal?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/15 04:32 AM
16

Well, people don't want to be in abusive relationships, so this "paranoia" is just someone trying to play it on the safe side.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/15 02:37 AM
11

They are perpetrated by men that women know. Not strangers. Rape is a premeditated crime.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/15 08:30 PM
3

Thank you.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/15 08:25 PM
7

male friends, classmates, or acquaintances
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/15 08:25 PM
3

When a woman says strong 9 out of 10 times she means aesthetically.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/15 07:59 PM
1

Well yeah.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/15 07:54 PM
4

By strong I meant What you meant and what is actually meant are two different things. No it doesn't. Yes it does.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/15 07:54 PM
13

I guarantee you the number of rapes will drop dramatically. The number of rapes would drop dramatically if women had absolutely no male friends, classmates, or acquaintances seeing as most rapes are perpetrated by someone the victim knows.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/15 07:52 PM
2

Strong is aesthetic like curvy or supple. decisive, assertive, has his own opinions, doesn't let me walk all over him". This translates to don't be a doormat. Doormats make terrible partners. All this stuff is pretty basic stuff.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/15 07:26 PM
1

I think you find this more among traditional circles. It's been my experience that this is not the case for more progressive people. I don't want a "macho" guy. I had one for a father and it was terrible.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/15 06:30 PM
4

Hey look everybody, it's how the world actually fucking works!
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/15 05:12 PM
1

Because it's a goddamn red-herring and you know it. You only brought feminism up because you want to score brownie points with your bros.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/15 04:32 PM
1

I'm not talking about evolution am i?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/15 04:31 PM
2

Why are you refusing to stay on topic?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/15 01:17 AM
3

it shifts the blame for things like AWALT, AF/BB, greed, and Chad-ness from the individual to the collective (society). A) aren't you guys against moralising things especially ideas the pertain to "female nature?" B) you realize that outside of TRP those concepts don't exist. C) poor Chad. Also, I'm not blaming anyone. Chances are you enjoy certain types of foods because you were influenced in some way or another by someone else. This blame game strawman falls on you. is the modus operandi of fe…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/15 01:10 AM
2

And I will respond with what amounts to me saying "you're wrong but you do you do" aka agree to disagree. And no you didn't.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/15 12:58 AM
2

Right, and I'm allowed to counter with my own opinion. Edit: then you're not here to start any type of intelligent discussion and are not arguing in good faith. I don't care if you are convinced or not.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/15 12:55 AM
2

The instincts that say you're not a special snowflake above animal urges are no longer there. Got it. Strawman. Can you give me something other than anecdotes or your opinion? •creates a CMV entirely out of his own opinion. •is upset when someone counters with their own opinion. •doesn't understand what a CMV is. I see you've reached the end of your rope. Any last words?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/15 12:51 AM
2

Of course, they will always be there to let us know when to get our hands off of a hot stove or when there is danger around us. But they won't have the overriding power they used to.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/15 12:46 AM
2

Yes, but why does it need to be pleasurable? Because society is one hell of an influence. If society says x thing is pleasurable, then you are probably going to find it pleasurable too. It can be the most harmful substance or fad, but you are going to find pleasurable nonetheless. Because you have internalized it as something to enjoy.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/15 12:44 AM
3

And we've been living in civilization for a very long time therefore survival instincts are pretty useless which is why we have the option to choose what we like and what we don't like.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/15 12:39 AM
2

You're ignoring the rest of my statement. The body will automatically reward you with anything you find pleasurable. Survival doesnt really matter. Unless you're telling me that doing drugs maximizes your chances of survival.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/15 12:34 AM
2

Everyone gets a dopamine rush out of socializing. Right, but it's a choice. The rush of dopamine is irrelevant seeing as you can get one by just looking at yourself in the mirror, or doing drugs, or eating a pound of lard. Instincts don't come with choices, they just happen. And yet, here we are choosing to do shit that doesn't help our survival. the body rewards any act that was evolved to lead to reproduction. No, the body rewards you with anything you deem as pleasurable or enjoyable. You lik…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/15 12:28 AM
3

Not really, because you can choose whether or not you want to socialize. Instincts don't normally come with options. Dopamine is just a small incentive that you can release when you eat, or do anything enjoyable. It's the same dopamine release men get from a new partner That's not really reproductive instinct if procreation isn't a result. women get from getting fucked by Chad. Why are you so jelly of Chad?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/15 12:15 AM
1

Well you just said 'it's not uncommon for young guys to have a lot of sex in their 20s'-well, I am in my 20s and am having no sex? Do you want a relationship or do you just want to smash? If you want to smash what's stopping you? during your youth you're likely going to be used to some extent as beta orbiter; Then don't allow people to use you. Except in the old days we had something closer to assortative mating And we still do. The amount of people that marry above their league is still smaller…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/15 12:08 AM
10

Humans are social animals, so survival of the group is more logical than survival of the self. Also, our survival instincts aren't as prominent as you think, they can easily be overrided by logical thought. Their prominence in our thoughts and actions explains men's obsession with sex and status, AWALT, AF/BB, everything that I have accepted as reality since taking TRP. That's your own cross to bear.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/15 11:59 PM
1

Not uncommon but guess what I'm missing out Missing out on what? moralising as 'salty' Because it is salty. "I don't want to be a BB I want to be an AF. I'm an AF but women are so shallow why? Waaaaaah. I remember back in the golden days where women couldn't choose and blah blah whiny nonsense." Regrettably yes, it happened to my dad And because it happened to your dad it's going to happen to you?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/15 11:36 PM
1

Oh look, it's our favorite troll. Thanks for stopping by.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/15 11:26 PM
1

Don't ignore sexual attraction, but what your dad said has some truth to it. You can't build a relationship solely on attraction. It'll just end up falling apart when both of you get tired of pretending to be something you're not. How is it nonsense? Because it ignores this little concept called growing up. Guess what, people's preferences change as they grow. Your brain doesn't stop developing well into your 20s and it is a phenomenon that exists in both men and women. It's not uncommon for men…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/15 11:23 PM
1

Sure, it's just a coincidence /s
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/15 11:11 PM
1

"Not all that glitters is gold." If you don't want to settle then don't, but don't go out of your league either because you won't find success. Also, this AF/BB nonsense isn't real. Get it out of your head.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/15 11:03 PM
1

A Terper who can't handle logical discussions? I'm shocked, SHOCKED I tell you! Also, I noticed how all of PostModernismSaveUs's replies to you have all been conveniently downvoted. Maybe you should read up on the rules of this place. Or do you really think you are some super special exception?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/15 10:49 PM
1

Exactly, there's no point in arguing with someone who is pointlessly aggressive and obnoxious (or as TRP likes to call it "masculine").
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/15 10:42 PM
1

I care about objectivity. I don't care about a certain groups feels. This is why I am here. If TRP was objective in any way and based on actual science instead of anecdotal whiny bullshit then I'd have nothing to argue. Too bad it's not.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/15 07:05 PM
1

You kidding me? I love talking about world affairs. I'm a history nerd. The thing is, I know which people in my life can handle a civil debate, and which can't. I'm most certainly not going to waste my breath talking about Syria, with someone who can't emotionally behave themselves. Chances are, this is what is happening to them. It is pretty obvious that these guys can't emotionally behave themselves, so women are put off actually speaking to them.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/15 07:02 PM
1

Ok, so in other words you are denying it.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/15 10:30 PM
1

No thanks
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/15 10:29 PM
1

Okay, in other words you are denying it.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/15 10:28 PM
2

No need to repeat yourself. We already know you're intellectually dishonest. Now are you going to keep denying that homosexuality is a tale as old as time?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/15 10:25 PM
1

So many.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/15 10:18 PM
1

So many.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/15 10:18 PM
1

Nope, you moved the goal-posts. I refuted it quite well.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/15 10:18 PM
2

Pregnant teens have a higher risk of getting high blood pressure -- called pregnancy-induced hypertension -- than pregnant women in their 20s or 30s. They also have a higher risk of preeclampsia. This is a dangerous medical condition that combines high blood pressure with excess protein in the urine, swelling of a mother's hands and face, and organ damage. These medical risks affect the pregnant teen, who may need to take medications to control symptoms. But they can also disrupt the unborn baby…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/15 10:17 PM
2

Yes around 20-22 years old.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/15 09:44 PM
1

Do you need a biology lesson?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/15 09:39 PM
6

What biological reason would that be? Adolescent girls aren't yet equipped to carry a pregnancy full term without any complications and those that do run higher risks than adult women. So the only reason we're left with is, he's sick in the head.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/15 09:33 PM
3

You brought marriage in you dunce :P
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/15 09:30 PM
3

Occasional buttsex for kicks, You're not a history buff are you? Also, you brought marriage in, not me. Maybe you should think before you hit enter.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/15 09:26 PM
4

I didn't ignore it. If you hit on kids, you're sick in the head. There's is no biological reason for a 40 year old man to be hitting on a teenager.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/15 09:23 PM
9

I've noticed that most BPs that respond say something along the lines of "there's nothing wrong with wanting a good mate, men should have higher expectations as well." I don't see BPs denying that women have high expectation but I do see a lot of outrage from RPs because they think it's unfair. So this question should be directed at RP.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/15 09:16 PM
4

That's traditionalism for ya.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/15 09:11 PM
0

Seems to me that women need to just be 'taught' that men aren't mindless, sex-crazed idiots That's rich coming from an RPer.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/15 09:05 PM
4

I remember my mom specifically telling me that sex should only be given to a man as a reward. My pleasure or enjoyment of sex be dammed.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/15 09:03 PM
5

Nope. If you hit on kids, you're sick in the head.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/15 09:02 PM
2

Or teach women that sex is a good thing and should be enjoyed.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/15 09:00 PM
6

Yes and along with it came an endless array of diseases and high maternal mortality rates. Gay marriage is a very recent historical aberration. Greeks don't real.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/15 09:00 PM
9

Do you actually consider sexual attraction to a 16 year old (or 17 for that matter) pedophilia? If the person in question is over 22 then yes. do you honestly see no difference between sexual attraction to a 16 year old and sexual attraction to an 8 year old? Both are children so no. Edit: seems I hit a nerve, well if the shoe fits.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/15 08:43 PM
6

Hopefully it's a mindset that can be stamped out in the next couple generations.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/15 08:39 PM
6

Homosexuality doesn't actually hurt anyone. Sexually preying on children does.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/15 08:38 PM
12

My mother is a very traditional person. She taught me that using sex as a bargaining chip is a good idea. It is a terrible idea, so I don't use it, but I know my mother is definitely not alone, so it is quite possible that a good number of women do use it.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/15 08:21 PM
6

I don't personally care about the power imbalance, but I sure as hell am not going to promote being a pedophile and deem it as okay.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/15 08:15 PM
4

There's a difference between saying "in my experience" and saying "this is how it works because reality and nature because this is just how it is and your an exception and YOU'RE WRONG!" The first one is not solipsism, it gives way for meaningful discussion. The second one is.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/15 07:46 PM
4

That's not even what I'm arguing. Strawman.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/15 05:47 PM
3

What a fucking strawman. Listen honey, I'm not here to argue your petty little straw arguments. I'm here to let you know that your idea that women were kept in harems since the beginning of times (especially in hunter-gatherer societies which are understood to have been pretty egalitarian) is false and not based on reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/15 05:36 PM
2

Why can't I walk up to a random man and call him a fuckboy?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/15 05:25 PM
5

Yes actual history, which you clearly know nothing of.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/15 05:25 PM
1

You want me to call strange men fuckboys?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/15 05:01 PM
5

They were kept in harems where they dominant males had full power over them. Bad Anthropology. Bad History.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/15 05:00 PM
2

Hypergamy is marrying up, not wanting a good partner. If you don't want to get left behind then don't be a shitty partner. It's that fucking simple. Wanting a good partner is not a bad thing and it most certainly is not hypergamy. You guys should probably stop shifting the goalposts, or at least, make it less obvious.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/15 04:51 PM
1

Great strawman.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/15 04:47 PM
0

Oh man, try harder honey.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/15 04:32 PM
5

Having a job proves that you are not lazy. A man with a job looks less lazy than a man without a job. I cannot believe you are throwing such a hissy fit.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/15 02:43 AM
0

I think it's pretty evident that you're the one who can't critically think That's rich coming from a guy that can't understand that an article that talks about selectiveness has no reason to mention hypergamy UNLESS it's trying to push some type of narrative. Christ, you guys are so fucking dense. Do you think that inflation has no place in an article about economic crisis? Brilliant red-herring. Brilliant.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/15 02:40 AM
3

Are you sure they are "low standards Yes. What does being dishevelled and bad sex have to do with jobs? And lazy. That's where my job part came in. It's right in your article. Maybe you should have read it huh?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/15 02:37 AM
2

Like I said before, if you can't think critically for a second and realize that hypergamy has no place in this article besides wanting to push an agenda, then you're wasting my time.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/15 02:33 AM
3

Like I said before, it doesn't matter. Most women want to start families. Starting a family with two people is a lot easier than stating one with a single person. why would a male be fine with Jenny who still lives with daddy and refuses to get a job, but a female wouldn't be fine with a male? Because men have low standards. BECAUSE THE DEALBREAKERS WOMEN TALKED ABOUT HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH JOBS, DO YOU FUCKING GET IT? DO YOU? If you can't think critically for a second then you're wasting my tim…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/15 02:30 AM
1

woosh
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/15 02:29 AM
2

So you haven't denied that women are picky, sexually selective princesses in the past who are much harder to please than men? Nope. the author "ties" hypergamy to sexual selectiveness And that's the problem. The data provided only showed selectiveness not hypergamy. The author is obviously trying to push some type of narrative.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/15 02:27 AM
-2

What a strawman.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/15 02:24 AM
4

It doesn't matter if we live in the stone age or not. Protection has jack shit to do with it. Most women are looking for relationships and to eventually settle down. They are thinking about the future. It makes sense that since they get the sharp end of the biological knife that they are the pickier sex. Johnny from anatomy class who is pursuing a degree is a better bet as a long term partner than Richard who still lives with his mom and refuses to get a job.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/15 02:24 AM
5

It doesn't matter. If a guy is hideous, or boring, or looks like a slob he's not getting a first date. Tough shit. And those are not the stats, that's bs TRP jargon that you drag around to fuel your victim complex. Get off the internet.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/15 02:20 AM
0

Like I told xemnas, pregnancy is more important than the precious feels of lowly men. Also, why do I have the feeling you probably denied that women are picky as fuck and only want the best high SMV they can get in the past, but changing your narrative now when cornered? Because you're biased as hell. Hypergamy is the practice of women "marrying up" Yes and unfortunately for you it is not synonymous with being selective.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/15 02:18 AM
-2

Yeah, pregnancy is more important than your feelings. So near 80% of men Oh jeez cut the shit with this stupid bull.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/15 02:12 AM
5

How is women being more selective (rightfully so btw) the same as hypergamy?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/15 02:03 AM
2

How the author tied being more selective to "hypergamy" shows just how shit the Telegraph is.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/15 01:44 AM
1

Yeah, because insulting a parent is completely the same as insulting some random stranger. Great logic there.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/15 01:07 AM
0

I never said it was random barbaric nonsense. I'm aware it had a point and said point was and still is barbaric. There's nothing more uncivilized than constantly worrying about what's going on between your female neighbor''s legs.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/15 12:30 AM
1

Like slut, bitch, and whore. And yet, men still use them.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/15 12:21 AM
1

You're acting like we're all incredibly different. When it comes to sex, it's all the same shit. Men want to control sex, and seeing as patriarchal societies engulf the entire globe in stupidity, it's not shocking that they value women for their goddamn vaginas.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/15 12:20 AM
1

I agree.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/15 12:10 AM
1

Because men believe in barbaric nonsense.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/15 12:09 AM
1

I gave you a list of insults women use to shame men. I don't care if you don't find them offensive.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/15 12:09 AM
2

Yeah that's why you should probably get off reddit. You believe the TRP bullshit and it's poisoning you. Can't say I'm shocked. You forgot the second part of that quote No, I didn't address it because it's stupid.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/15 11:57 PM
1

Because our society is still pretty barbaric and full of puritan nonsense.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/15 11:39 PM
0

We do. Tom-cat, manwhore, sperm donor, fuckboy.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/15 11:39 PM
1

• Female • If we're talking about neckbeards here then I'd probably not even notice them. • No. I'd give them a polite smile. • Nope! The only way I'd treat them differently is if they smelled like shit (which you have stated they do not) or if their attitude was total shit. Edit: I read "quasimodo" and immediately thought we were talking about actually deformed people, not people who can change their appearance if they just put in some effort. Edited accordingly.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/15 11:38 PM
3

FUCKING THANK YOU!
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/15 11:03 PM
5

There is no common ground to be found in an ideology that only speaks in terms of black and white. Your post is an excellent example.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/15 10:53 PM
1

Nice try cupcake. I'm still waiting on the nonexistent source you refuse to provide.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/15 09:03 PM
10

Now there's a thought.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/15 07:53 PM
1

So nothing. Gotcha.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/15 07:36 PM
5

No, and I don't know any woman who would even think about it. You seem to have a warped view of how women function. Anyone who would attempt this is clinically insane and should be institutionalized. Don't get me wrong, crazy people come in all shapes and sizes, but they make up tiny minority. I suggest you leave reddit for a while. BP generally has no empathy for RP men, I have never been given a reason to empathize with them, and doing so would be completely counterproductive.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/15 07:36 PM
1

Lovely red-herring. Still can't give me anything of value I see. I'm shocked, SHOCKED I tell you.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/15 07:20 PM
1

Seeing as men are more likely to be morons than geniuses, that's highly doubtful.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/15 07:07 PM
2

Not even close. You're reaching so hard it's embarrassing.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/15 06:55 PM
5

I think Roosh is a delusional loser who thinks he's more important than he actually is. Unfortunately losers like him are a dime a dozen so he has an audience full of bottom-of-the-barrel men who hang off his every word in order to make themselves feel like they are actually worth something. He's essentially afraid of women and is upset. Everything he writes should be disregarded.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/15 06:07 PM
2

I love how most of you have tapped danced around this question and instead threw a racist hissy fit. Must be because there is jack shit you can guys can actually provide that is of any value anymore. There's enough problems in my own country to deal with those of another. Frankly, the British authorities should be doing their damn jobs.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/15 05:58 PM
1

If that's our metric then you might as well use any place called China Town as an example that the Chinese are secretly plotting to take over. Or hell, Little Italy.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/15 05:19 PM
-1

Just like /u/Iamyourmarriage, as a woman, values success and sexual prowess in men, Oh honey don't flatter yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/15 05:17 PM
1

Lmao! Please provide a link of where I virgin shamed anyone.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/15 04:57 PM
3

Thanks for doing the hard work for me. There's a reason I said short answer. It all boils down to physical strength.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/15 04:54 PM
6

It still applies. Slut-shaming is nothing more than an inability to mind your own business and sour grapes. For women those sour grapes are: waaaahh she's getting more attention than I am. She must be a SLUT!
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/15 04:53 PM
0

We're talking about religions like Christianity, not what some backwards society considered adultery.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/15 04:27 PM
5

What would be the point of having dominance behaviors in a creature with no physical strength? Does that make sense to you?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/15 05:47 AM
5

Lmao, you're hilarious
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/15 05:41 AM
7

You're entire argument falls apart because you refuse to understand that the only reason men are more dominant and aggressive is because they are physically stronger.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/15 05:38 AM
5

Same. Or by catcallers who get upset that I don't give them the time if day.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/15 05:35 AM
8

Not even close. Try again.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/15 05:35 AM
5

By nature men are more aggressive yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/15 05:31 AM
7

there are dominance heirarchies within each ecosystem, with larger, physically stronger species/individuals tending to dominate more than others. Are you telling me bigger things dominate smaller things through physical strength? You don't say. Gee, it sure sounds a whole lot like what I said in the beginning: short answer physical strength came about cause of our elevated tendency to aggression/dominance, via testosterone. Please read above.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/15 05:29 AM
5

Like I said: short answer, physical strength. That's how it started. It evolved from that to religion, then to propaganda and now the tables are turning.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/15 05:15 AM
8

Yes, and it turns out that men love to make sure women have little to no power so that's not a good start for you. Also, the Telegraph is not even close to an actual source. I can easily find an article from some bullshit website that says men are programmed to eat their own shit, but I wouldnt pass it off as an actual source of data.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/15 04:48 AM
8

it just so happens that men were created with better leadership and teamwork skills. Little too convenient. Source?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/15 04:13 AM
0

Then you should take it up with them. I still don't see the point. People are hypocrites, no shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/15 03:56 AM
7

Rhinos, mastadons, and neanderthals are different species. Why would they have wanted to dominate us? Do gorillas go dominate other animals? No. but the real patriarchal rulers weren't the biggest buffest dudes. They were the ones who could command the respect of the big buff dudes. There's a reason I said short answer. It wasn't respect. The one with the most wealth normally ruled. The one with the most wealth also had the resources to pay "big buff dudes" to work for him. And if it wasn't reso…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/15 03:41 AM
17

Slut-shaming is nothing more than a mixture of not being able to mind your own business and sour grapes(why won't she fuck me? Waaaahh). It's not regulation, it's a way to further devalue a woman on what society considers to be her most important asset. Thankfully, the word slut means hardly anything anymore much like bitch or whore. notice how almost every mainstream religion has something about sluts adulterers going to hell FTFY. We will have already descended into mass-cuckoldry, where Chad …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/15 03:35 AM
4

Short answer: physical strength.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/15 03:27 AM
0

Well duh, what's your point?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/15 03:25 AM
1

I like men who have their shit together. I expect my man to care about what I think, so that's a complete turn-off. I'm asking because if those qualities are masculine, then you might as well strap a dick on me and call me Thomas along with all my female friends.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/15 03:23 AM
2

Believing in yourself and always going after what you want, not letting other people change your opinion of what you want. Not caring what other people think. Not afraid to be bold when it's right, but overall very calm and happy with yourself. How are these platitudes strictly masculine?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/15 01:44 AM
1

Then don't do it. Concepts like masculinity and femininity are overrated and serve no purpose besides shoving people into boxes.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/15 01:41 AM
1

Wow. Still so edgy. Much white supremacist. Wow.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/15 01:31 AM
1

So edgy
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/15 01:25 AM
4

I have. I said I wasn't going to entertain your racist paranoia. That's me adressing it. When you make a claim like "women can't lead" without backing it up and then refusing to do so when asked, is essentially forfeit. Why? Because you probably don't have anything to back it up in the first place and you're just trying to save a little face. Oh god, you're one of those people who hates humanity Correct. and thinks we should live like stone age people. Incorrect. I love technology.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/15 01:21 AM
1

Shit post is shit post
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/15 01:14 AM
6

No, you being a woman prevents you from leading properly. Lol citation please. Something actually scientific and not some breitbart article please. And I have literally all of history to show you why you're wrong, and why it couldn't have happened any other way. Nope. Mass genocides, rapes, and men being complete savages to one another all in the name of something really stupid is most of our history unfortunately. Bonobos seem pretty happy, I wonder why?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/15 01:12 AM
1

Shit post is shit post.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/15 01:10 AM
5

More confirmation for why women should not be allowed to lead Me being white somehow prevents me from leading? Riiight. Again, I have literally all of history to show you just how full of shit men in leadership positions are. Less advanced? Nah. We probably wouldn't have taken such a giant shit on the planet. We'd probably be happier.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/15 01:08 AM
4

Yup. So what? You're saying a society run by women would have invented the car, the airplane, and the Internet all without going through a bloody history first? Probably less bloody.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/15 01:00 AM
9

So shitty that because of this leadership we sit in front of our screens communicating over what could be thousands of miles away. Those men, especially those Western white men, did such a shit job. Oh yeah, a few hundred year's of a technological boost in comparison to thousands of years of genocide, enslavement, and cultural massacre all on the whims of some power hungry idiot. Woops, silly me, I forgot you guys idolize savages like Genghis Khan. You say it isn't of real world value. You've ta…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/15 12:55 AM
12

Wow, Muslims believe in typically Muslim things. Color me shocked. You are exactly the reason that women should not be allowed in positions of political power. Oh please. Don't start with this shit honey because I have literally all of recorded history to show just how shitty male leadership actually is. I'm not going to entertain your paranoid racist nonsense, mostly because these people are essentially at the mercy of the first world. And stop acting like it was women who opened the flood gate…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/15 12:32 AM
1

Then get off of a public forum if you're so upset.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/15 12:17 AM
1

If I needed protection, I'd buy myself a gun. As for the rest, yes and yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/15 12:17 AM
16

No, honey it is a fantasy. More immigration from Islamic countries =/= the end of Europe as we know it. If we really wanted to, we could level that entire fucking area with a few nukes, but having millions of innocent people die because a few psychos don't know their place isn't a good trade off. Defend her from Muslim rape culture. Something with real world value please.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/15 12:13 AM
2

Freedom of speech works both ways. You can't say something stupid and actually expect people to listen to you without telling you to shut-up at some point. Freedom of speech doesn't give you special privileges to spout all kinds of garbage without any dissent or consequences.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/15 12:09 AM
15

That's a really cool revenge fantasy. Quick question, what can a man possibly do for a woman that would cause her to choose to be his subordinate? Give me examples.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/15 11:58 PM
11

If you don't want to respect women by all means don't. I personally don't give a shit about whatever happens in your personal lives. But please stop crying every time someone calls you out on your crap. And also remember that your stereotypical construct of what a "man" should be is slowly being eradicated by more progressive ideas, so it'd be pretty smart to, at some point, reconnect with the real world.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/15 11:19 PM
1

Didn't Mr. Sour Grapes Archwinger start one?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/15 11:13 PM
3

And where did I overgeneralize? Please enlighten me.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/15 08:21 PM
14

Don't you know? Liver spots are super sexy to HB10s.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/15 08:16 PM
2

This is the correct answer.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/15 08:08 PM
1

It's very possible that you might have Bipolar Disorder.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/15 08:02 PM
1

I studied animal mating patterns And I've trained dogs. Would I come to the conclusion that they only stick around for food? No. Other animals =/= humans.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/15 07:52 PM
1

Serious question: do you have schizophrenia?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/15 07:49 PM
1

You need to get away from TRP. Take a break, because you're starting believe concepts that don't actually exist in the real world.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/15 07:48 PM
3

Eh, it's a TRP sentiment that women dig psychopaths so I thought it'd be a good idea to include it in my list.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/15 07:46 PM
1

But why do you think they are laughing at you? It is more likely they are laughing at something else that has nothing to do with you.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/15 07:46 PM
1

Why do you think they are laughing at you?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/15 07:44 PM
7

This is the funniest shit I've read all day. Congrats.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/15 07:43 PM
1

Then I take back what I said. Do you feel it is necessary in order to have a functional relationship?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/15 07:40 PM
3

Idk, why didn't they ostracize catholic priests?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/15 07:39 PM
1

Wat? You should find a new doctor then.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/15 07:38 PM
3

SJW is just a title just like Catholic Priests, or Pastors, or Humanitarians. Shitty people come in all shapes and sizes.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/15 07:37 PM
2

I'm married, but in a parallel universe where I'm not my preferences would be: •No Spanish guys. •No religious men. •No criminals. •No overweight men. •Trans men are fine. •Must be intelligent.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/15 07:36 PM
9

It confirms nothing aside from the fact that sex offenders come in all shapes and sizes.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/15 07:24 PM
3

Have you ever been to a convention? Nerdy gamers aren't hawt d00dz You've clearly never seen pro CSGO players or male streamers on Twitch. Or male streamers on YouTube. Being a nerd doesn't automatically make you physically unattractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/15 07:02 PM
2

Dread breeds drama.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/15 06:41 PM
4

No. Women have always been in these spaces, except now it's more acceptable for them to be open about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/15 06:40 PM
2

There's no such thing as a healthy dose of dread especially when you are purposely doing it just to get your way with your partner.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/15 06:04 PM
0

How is what he's saying a logical fallacy? Because you don't like the language he used?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/15 05:39 PM
3

Not with his attitude.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/15 05:38 PM
5

Oh right, because IQ is 'culturally biased' according to you 'progressives'. It's just cute how you think that a score of 129 is something to pat yourself on the back for. Nah, i'd rather stay and intentionally accelerate the decline. Yeah, you're making such a dent. /s
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/15 06:01 AM
9

I have an IQ of 129, holy shit my sides How many out of wedlock children in poverty are you bloopers going to cause with your cheering on hypergamy/single motherhood? ALL OF THEM. This country is fucked. Nah, we're good. You can leave though.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/15 05:54 AM
6

i've completely adopted TRP and sworn off marriage altogether. And the human race thanks you :) Also, why are you so angry?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/15 05:41 AM
8

Not really. She is more likely to get married than you are, and that's not me being mean, that's just reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/15 05:37 AM
1

sigh No I was trying to illustrate a point that men and women interact with each other differently when it comes to sex and romance. The person I was trying to illustrate said point to was stating that men should be respected by women because of their strength due to the off chance he might beat her up or something. I can link you to the ordeal if you want some more context.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/15 05:25 AM
7

That's the perfect equation for a turbulent relationship that literally survives off of drama and nothing else. It is also a type of relationship that can easily wander into abusive territory. Either way, it sounds miserable and tedious.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/15 03:30 AM
1

I'm feeling particularly lazy today.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/15 03:29 AM
7

The issue was that he didn't undestand how men and women interact romantically. Strength is a respectable trait to other men like beauty is a respectable trait to other women. Strength is not a respectable trait to other women though just like beauty is not a respectable trait to other men. They are perks. Don't get me wrong, I love muscles but a muscular guy doesn't automatically get my respect because he's got nice biceps. That's stupid. Also, you should never be afraid of your SO, that's unhe…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/15 02:02 AM
11

If relationships really were the way RPers make them out to be, then getting into a relationship would be completely pointless. There is no point in being with someone who constantly makes you feel dread. You get into relationships to be happy and to build something with someone else, not to be constantly miserable.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/15 01:53 AM
4

Well, he's destined to be a terrible lay.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/15 01:49 AM
1

But if you're "never" running into issues where one person needs to make a decision, well I'm not sure I believe you. That's fine, you don't have to. Honestly, my husband and I are pretty alike and running into these problems hardly ever happens. Whenever we do run into issues, the partner with the most experience dealing with said problem usually gets the final say. If we're both experienced, then coin toss it is. One thing that is commonly misunderstood is that in the captain\first mate that I…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/15 01:48 AM
3

You've said too much.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/15 01:18 AM
5

You sound like a terrible lay.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/15 01:10 AM
1

.. that the male should be stronger and more dominant, it is aligned with sexual attraction. That still doesn't explain why though. Male dominance in the bedroom is sexy and all, but it has little to do with actual leadership skills. Who decides when you're deadlocked? When it comes down to it, my husband and I normally toss a coin. Other blue couples come back to the situation at a better time and propose another alternative. Then again, it is very rare that we ever run into a deadlocked situat…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/15 01:05 AM
0

It's still criticism except you don't like the language.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/15 11:52 PM
3

How is criticism "silencing"?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/15 11:27 PM
1

Because it is the natural order of relationships Why? Furthermore, in a "leaderless relationship" there are constant power struggles, despite the claim of "total equality." What about a relationship where leadership is interchangeable? This is what most blues mean when we say equal. Many companies experiment with egalitarian setups and find that it works on only a very limited scope, and that people naturally need authority in order to work together efficiently. Businesses aren't really relation…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/15 09:33 PM
1

I can't convince you that I respect my husband because your definition of respect is very narrow and seems to only apply to men. I have presented my case for why you are wrong and have asked you to answer why a woman should submit to a man. You have refused to answer. I have assumed that you have overtly stated to your husband "that we are equal" and he has accepted it. And this can't be farther from the truth but I'm not going to waste time and go into details about my marriage.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/15 08:28 PM
1

It's impossible to take you guys seriously when you defend your ideals with religious fervor and then back track by saying "well it's our opinion" when you can no longer create an argument. This isn't how debates work.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/15 08:20 PM
2

I'VE ALREADY GIVEN UP SO MUCH! D: jk. So it's essentially lent.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/15 08:17 PM
14

Notice how I said Intercourse. If he grabs her ass but she doesn't like it, it wouldn't fall into the rape category.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/15 08:15 PM
1

sigh Yes I read it and everything that I said still applies. If you can no longer defend your position then say so. But please don't resort to ad hom, it makes you look weak.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/15 08:13 PM
11

Forced Intercourse by any person (SO, spouse, random stranger, aquiantance, friend relative, etc.). Cases where drugs and alcohol were involved would be handled more carefully.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/15 08:08 PM
1

I was debating your idea of respect. And the orginal OP was asking RPers what's their issue with equal relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/15 07:58 PM
1

It's not an insult, It is, because it was an unwarranted comment that came out of nowhere. The reason you used it was because you could no longer defend your original position so ad hom was the way to go. This isn't my first rodeo honey. so I have two kids and we've been together over 10 years, so I don't mind you throwing jabs but make sure they're accurate. Right back at ya.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/15 07:53 PM
1

No, you're here to defend your views, not insult someone else's happy marriage because your relationships don't work. If you can't defend your views without insults then I'll happily make a case to the mods to ban you.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/15 07:45 PM
1

You know nothing about my relationship aside from the very small examples I showed you to counter your ridiculous assertions and you decide that instead of continuing the debate, you'd rather insult my marriage.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/15 07:34 PM
1

Women speak to men in ways men to not speak to men with startling frequency. Men and women communicate with each other differently. The way I communicate with my husband is different than the way I communicate with my girlfriends. And I honestly can't say that I've seen women treat men like shit out in public. Whenever my husband and I start talking trash to one another out in public infront of our friends it's always playfully. It is a refusal to submit and recognize the physical strength of th…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/15 07:28 PM
1

If you talk to anyone in a manner that'll get a man hit, then it's disrespectful. It's not a gendered thing. I don't understand why you're trying to make it one or why you brought it the strength disparity to explain something that is not gendered. We're equal is a sign of disrespect, How in the hell did you come to this conclusion?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/15 07:16 PM
1

Thank you for the interesting replies. I thought you were going to be hostile but I was pleasantly surprised.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/15 07:04 PM
1

I never said that. I know, which is why I said implied. en you start talking shit, you get hit. We learn that stuff in grade school. And that only applies to men, not women. I'm not going to respect my husband on the off chance that he might hit me. That's ridiculous. Because they're DISRESPECTING her by not recognizing her beauty. No, they are disrespecting her because she is beautiful and men don't see beauty as something to respect. Seems pretty silly till you have a household with 2 kids, th…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/15 06:55 PM
1

Hey, remember when I said that this would be my last question? I lied. You have really interesting answers so I'll ask another one. This also pertains to legacies and offspring: Do you think women who don't want to have children are insulting their SOs or emasculating them?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/15 06:48 PM
2

No I mean misandrist, you're implying that men should be respected because of strength as if that's their only respectable characteristic. It's not, it's cosmetic. That's not respect. A beautiful woman walks down the street and gets harassed by men constantly. A boss gives his pretty secretary a raise because he has a thing for her, not because he respects her. A pretty woman gets a less harsh sentence because the "Women are Wonderful" effect works especially well on pretty women. Everything you…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/15 06:43 PM
1

Okay, this is my last question and it's probably going to seem rather out of the blue, but it's a sentiment I've seen quite a bit over at TRP of what makes a marriage or relationship "successful", for the man anyways. Do you think having children count as an actual legacy and shows that a man is a winner? Sorry if I worded this weird.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/15 06:26 PM
1

Do you think RP relationships are "natural"? Bonus: do you think men should lead and women should follow?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/15 06:09 PM
3

What is no nothing november?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/15 05:59 PM
2

Kind of a cop out but fair enough. Do you think RP relationships are happier?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/15 05:57 PM
2

Do you consider your wife to be inferior to you because of her vagina? And please don't cop-out by saying "no, I just think men and women are different".
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/15 05:25 PM
2

You don't understand how male female interactions work is the issue here. Men respect each other's strength because it is seen as something to respect by other men. Women, on the other hand, don't see strength as something to respect because we are not men. A man's strength is completely cosmetic to us, so it is attractive. Again greater strength =/= respect. That's silly. Besides you're comparing apples to oranges. Women have no reason to respect a man's strength just like men have no reason to…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/15 05:20 PM
6

I was more replying to the person who replied to you, who seems to think that RP coined the term "traditional relationship"
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/15 01:28 AM
5

It's a crock of shit. If you're bad in bed, you're bad in bed. Having sex with a Virgin isn't going to suddenly make you a great lay.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/15 01:25 AM
8

Egalitarian all the way. It's just easier in my opinion and causes less turbulence as the years progress.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/15 01:18 AM
17

You guys don't have a monopoly on traditional relationships, just an unhealthy obsession with them.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/15 01:16 AM
4

That's awesome! Are you guys traditional or lean more towards egalitarian?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/15 01:01 AM
5

Thank you.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/15 12:47 AM
6

Hey we're on the same boat :) what's your relationship like?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/15 12:31 AM
8

And RPers obsess over being winners, which explains their hostility towards egalitarian relationships and their obsession with traditional relationships. The idea of an interchangeable leadership role is completely inconceivable to them.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/15 11:29 PM
9

The way I see it "would make a great husband" has a positive connotation. Then again, the things that I looked for in a husband are not traditional so you might not agree.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/15 11:11 PM
1

Well, for starters, we're closer to bonobos than chimps. This isn't even a counter example, it's just blatant hamstering.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/15 09:29 PM
9

In my marriage we just toss a coin.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/15 09:18 PM
3

I'll bite. Yes, I am. But I don't respect him for his physical strength, that's idiotic. His strength is cosmetic, like men who like women with long hair. Is a man supposed to respect me because I have really long hair? No.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/15 08:20 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter