TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

IanTTT Archive

View 1 post and 74 comments by IanTTT on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
8

IanTTT/r/MensRights17/08/12 02:13 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

A man can't claim he was raped because he was drunk.
/r/PussyPass25/07/14 06:16 PM
1

Call cops
/r/PussyPass25/07/14 06:00 PM
0

British free medicine , maybe one day of work. Not too bad. All minor assaults should be treated this way. That being said, if he'd had the vagina and she the penis, she'd be in jail for years.
/r/PussyPass25/07/14 05:45 PM
5

Blues Brothers
/r/MGTOW13/10/13 01:23 AM
2

Read this sub, tell me it's not about par
/r/MensRights04/10/13 10:17 PM
0

In two ways, MRMs have been "critiqued", and many employ misogynist rhetoric, at least on this sub.
/r/MensRights03/10/13 10:40 PM
1

Post the link, and if it's restricted, find another source. If we can't read what your responding to in context, how can we interpret your response? The discussion becomes mastabatory when everyone's venting frustrations in line with yours, not actually weighing the feminists arguments with yours, and adding to the discussion. if your afraid that free thinking men will be swayed if you link the site, consider yourself sold on a feminist agenda. If you just don't want to spread the hate, consider…
/r/MensRights03/10/13 12:57 PM
5

"The men's rights movement's claims and activities have been critiqued by scholars and others, and sectors of the movement have been described as misogynist."
/r/MensRights03/10/13 08:09 AM
1

No link, so called counter arguments without context
/r/MensRights03/10/13 08:04 AM
2

The perspective on this one is pretty disturbing, too. http://thegloss.com/beauty/elizabeth-bathory-serial-killer-143/
/r/MensRights02/02/13 07:59 PM
1

Where?
/r/MensRights02/02/13 06:24 PM
1

Im an American! Do I get to be the overlord of your tiny nation nation now? No? Then make your own fucking laws. Buying into US cultural imperialism is bad.
/r/MensRights21/08/12 03:12 PM
1

That would be some pretty good service.
/r/MensRights21/08/12 02:46 AM
3

That could be just as bad, for the man.
/r/MensRights21/08/12 02:43 AM
0

"I've never seen a penis" Google it so you'll know what to look for.
/r/MensRights21/08/12 02:40 AM
1

Third room is the sink behind the counter
/r/MensRights21/08/12 02:34 AM
4

Men's rooms are cleaner? Where?
/r/MensRights21/08/12 02:28 AM
1

5'7" is short?
/r/MensRights18/08/12 01:55 PM
1

And? If you're going to compare the two, establish a standard for "worse" and then show why one is worse than the other. You can make whatever claims you want, but unless they're part of a framework I have no way to evaluate them.
/r/MensRights18/08/12 01:01 PM
1

This is exactly why I made this post. Your ideas are probably the key to MRAs achieving legitimacy.
/r/MensRights17/08/12 07:24 PM
1

I was a paid intern for an advocacy group too. Don't y'all use messaging when doing social outreach? I worked in the Texas legislature and a key part or my work was framing issues in the way most likely to be effective, and most likely to get vocal public support.
/r/MensRights17/08/12 01:56 PM
1

Resort to language? What do you mean? We communicate through language. If we control that language, we win arguments, control the dialogue and reach more people.
/r/MensRights17/08/12 01:53 PM
1

I'm not suggesting we stop discussing those issues, I'm suggesting that we develop a standard which will help us more effectively discuss those issues and legitimize our ideas in the minds of those opposed to them. Why is it important to make our ideas legitimate by opposition standard? Because we already believe our ideas. To have effect as activists, we must focus on reaching those who don't already agree, or are not aware. Otherwise, this sub is just a circle jerk.
/r/MensRights17/08/12 01:50 PM
1

Have you been raped/ falsely confused? Can you do anything more that assume whatever you feel is right? You're comparing two different things without establishing a framework (definitions, weighing mechanism, etc.)
/r/MensRights17/08/12 01:45 PM
1

Many shelters ban men entirely, so I was wondering if he same logic applied.
/r/MensRights17/08/12 01:37 PM
1

Domestic violence did not necessarily occur (beyond the actual slaying), but the article does seem a bit to sympathetic to the female suspect, especially when it talks about her emotional state.
/r/MensRights17/08/12 02:16 AM
3

Should men volunteer at rape crisis centers? Most cater to female victims, who have often been raped by males.
/r/MensRights17/08/12 01:56 AM
1

I read that as accused, not convicted, sorry. I see your point now. However, the rape has lifelong long effects on the victim, too. I know many victims, and it doesnt end when it's over. False conviction is horrible, but it cant be compared to rape in that way (I'm not saying rape is worse, it just has wholly different effects than false conviction and really cant be effectively compared in a general statement.
/r/MensRights17/08/12 01:49 AM
1

I would make the assertion that women were moving to equality, while feminism as theory was very radical, and we can see the same radical ideas in today's extremist views.
/r/MensRights17/08/12 12:20 AM
1

Legally it was rape, and though the law should be changed it has not changed. I don't think he was raped in a moral sense, but he was certainly victimized and exploited, in an analogous way. People are held accountable for other things while drunk (commiting crimes, such as rape), so I understand where your coming from, but a bad law is still a law and should be applied as fairly as possible.
/r/MensRights17/08/12 12:17 AM
1

There are extremists now and extremists then. A little bit of hypocrisy won't kill feminism anymore than it did then.
/r/MensRights17/08/12 12:10 AM
1

I'd be inclined to agree about drunk consent, but if the op were a women he'd be protected by the law here. Edit: he certainly is being exploited.
/r/MensRights16/08/12 10:07 PM
1

I've always wondered why there was no male pill. Thanks bro.
/r/MensRights16/08/12 09:29 PM
1

People are suggesting mandatory testing, some with no opt out. Also, govs. do keep databases. In Texas, for example, anyone convicted, or in some cases accused of a felony must give a sample. There are larger national databases and similar things. Edit: if the sample is kept on file, medical records can be subpoenaed by a judge.
/r/MensRights16/08/12 07:47 PM
1

People are suggesting mandatory testing, some with no opt out. Also, govs. do keep databases. In Texas, for example, anyone convicted, or in some cases accused of a felony must give a sample. There are larger national databases and similar things.
/r/MensRights16/08/12 07:46 PM
2

Probably, and I hope so, but the (perhaps irational) fear of it being added to some gov. database is enough for many not to want it. Also, some men would prefer not to know about paternity, and it becomes a civil rights issue when you start testing peoples DNA without an opt out.
/r/MensRights16/08/12 07:32 PM
2

I wouldn't necessarily have a problem with it, but some people wouldn't want it in a database or something.
/r/MensRights16/08/12 07:18 PM
1

The difference between responsibility and blame is an important distinction to make. You do this well. As a society we should Never blame a victim, but we should impress upon everyone that reducing the risk of an attack (sexual or otherwise) is possible by taking precautions.
/r/MensRights16/08/12 07:11 PM
2

I'm sorry I don't know anything like that in Lithuania or elsewhere, but good luck!
/r/MensRights16/08/12 07:03 PM
1

Oops. You're right, but I'm still not optomistic about the draft dissolving feminism.
/r/MensRights16/08/12 06:24 PM
2

The people who believe what's written here don't understand the concept of personal responsibility. A batterer should be held responsible for battery. Not all men, not the women who "ask for it" or whatever. The way this article is written, you may as well beat your SO, because your just as bad.
/r/MensRights16/08/12 06:21 PM
1

Further research couldn't have lead to a better solution?
/r/MensRights16/08/12 06:01 PM
1

Don't get me wrong, I never said its fair. This is a black and white example of a double standard. We should have equal rights. The problem lies in the fact that men and women are biologically different, and as we know from history, separate but equal is a very tricky concept.
/r/MensRights16/08/12 05:16 PM
4

In some areas it's definitely expected.
/r/MensRights16/08/12 05:12 PM
1

They aren't required, just expected. The parents should agree on the kids name, or take to court.
/r/MensRights16/08/12 05:11 PM
1

It's not about living at home. The consent laws apply in school because the teacher is an authority figure, not because the students lived at home.
/r/MensRights16/08/12 05:01 PM
7

That didn't happen with Vietnam (around the height of the feminist movement), or in WW1 WW2, which were right after suffrage. I agree that a sexist draft is more wrong than an equal one, but I think this image refers to the sacrifice of soldiers for non-soldiers, and reminds us that peace must be defended, not a gender thing.
/r/MensRights16/08/12 04:48 PM
1

The op is referring to the sentiment, which is discrimination and oppression. I think
/r/MensRights16/08/12 04:41 PM
1

Your unemployed mother may agree to help you raise the child. Even if you don't get custody, that may help getting visitation and seeking custody once you recover from this. You can recover from this, believe that.
/r/MensRights16/08/12 04:36 PM
1

Thats called date rape (it wasn't violent, but an intoxicated person cannot legally give consent.) You are a victim. The bad part is, though you were physically and now financially exploited, you're probably SOL.
/r/MensRights16/08/12 04:34 PM
1

Without the DNA test, the court can.
/r/MensRights16/08/12 04:31 PM
3

Two methods, minimum
/r/MensRights16/08/12 04:23 PM
1

Your parents might be willing to help you. The child exists, it's yours and the court will make you financially responsible. If you live with your parents the court might be sympathetic if they agree to help rear the child. (my uncle recentley one custody in Texas because my mother (his sister) was able to provide support) Beyond that, good luck man. We feel for you.
/r/MensRights16/08/12 04:23 PM
2

Many men don't want their biological info in the hands of anyone else for reasons unrelated to the child.
/r/MensRights16/08/12 04:15 PM
1

I thought you were giving me my queue. /s
/r/MensRights16/08/12 04:12 PM
1

If we lump them together and become prejudiced because it is convenient, we only widen the division between MRAs and feminists and make an emotional issue out of an ideological difference.
/r/MensRights16/08/12 04:10 PM
1

Exactly. "Holding beliefs" implies a consciousness. Being made up of beliefs is more appropriate. Why is that important? "Feminism" does not refer to anybody, while "feminists" does. The ideology does not believe any ideas, it is ideas. People who subscribe to an ideology believe the ideas.
/r/MensRights16/08/12 04:08 PM
4

That's an appropriate response. If you want to discuss something effectively, be correct. You know that not all MRAs are misogynists, so it's hypocritical to group everyone that calls themselves a feminist. Many who identify as feminists are really just humanists and don't subscribe to real feminist theory. Though they make the mistake of grouping themselves with all other feminists, we should not make the same mistake they do.
/r/MensRights16/08/12 03:46 PM
0

Some feminists, not " feminism". Feminism is an ideology, and is not capable of holding beliefs. The beginning of discrimination is grouping people inappropriately, and thus the distinction between feminists (people) and feminism (ideology) is important.
/r/MensRights16/08/12 03:40 PM
1

You misunderstand "sample size". To get an adequate sample of data you should look at both small towns and big cities.
/r/MensRights16/08/12 03:33 PM
1

Than a rape victim? That's a pretty extreme viewpoint.
/r/MensRights16/08/12 03:30 PM
3

Or humanist
/r/MensRights16/08/12 03:21 PM
2

Thanks, that's perfect.
/r/MensRights15/08/12 10:34 PM
2

I think that having to register as a sex offender is the worst part of her sentence. however, I wonder whether or not employers and neighbors will care as much as they would with a male sex offender. Not likely.
/r/MensRights15/08/12 09:52 PM
1

I'd pay the same.
/r/MensRights15/08/12 09:31 PM
5

Source? I'd love to know where to send people when the pay gap comes up in discussions.
/r/MensRights15/08/12 09:31 PM
1

Only men have orgasms
/r/MensRights15/08/12 08:59 PM
2

The reason this sub often focuses on anti feminism is the same reason feminist ideas can be anti-man. In the same way men are responsible for some issues the feminist movement deals with, the men's rights movement deals with many issues caused by feminism. For example, men are considered more predatory than women in society due to the fact that more men commit acts of rape than women. The rape of women by men is a feminist issue (as well as general societal issue)while the discrimination against…
/r/MensRights15/08/12 08:30 PM
3

Great advice bro. Vacation cured my depression. A lifetime of suicidal ideation suddenly stops when you get some sun.
/r/MensRights15/08/12 08:09 PM
1

It's because the penis be too small. To clarify, I was given this reason once. It was a bad day.
/r/MensRights15/08/12 07:40 PM
1

Thanks.
/r/MensRights15/08/12 07:21 PM
2

Good beer, more acceptance of liberal ideas, less religion in politics. In Rome I saw some racism, and I know there are European conservatives, but it just seems more liberal.
/r/MensRights15/08/12 06:59 PM
1

As an American who has barely traveled to Europe, is everything as great as it sounds on your continent?
/r/MensRights15/08/12 06:35 PM
2

As a former competitive debater, I read quite a bit of theory, and "ran" (used) feminist arguments, some of which were related to the theory you referenced. I'm male, and my partner was male. Like most theory, feminist theory isn't practical for casual discussion. It's mostly academic and goes far beyond simple egalitarian humanism. So just chill about it.
/r/MensRights15/08/12 06:28 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter