TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

IcarusBurning Archive

View 8 posts and 479 comments by IcarusBurning on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
13

So...they beat the ghost by sucking it's dick all together. Is that what I am seeing?
/r/MensRights19/07/16 08:41 PM
17

Something tells me that her apologizing would be an admission of guilt, and every other person would then have even more evidence (beyond their already outstanding slam-dunk cases) to retrieve money from her.
/r/MensRights26/05/16 04:22 AM
13

No, the age of consent is the age of consent. All else being legal, a 17 year old can consent to sex with an adult or any age provided the age of consent is <=17. It's hilarious that you came in here and spouted bullshit with no citation and then demanded that anyone who challenge you go through the effort that you refused to.
/r/MensRights25/02/16 01:09 PM
1

My girlfriend has one of these a week. Once she thought she was still asleep and slapped me.
/r/MensRights18/02/16 11:09 PM
8

So now we're going to punish juries for making wrong decisions?
/r/MensRights05/01/16 03:21 PM
-2

So who exactly do you trust to put out accurate statistics?
/r/MensRights03/01/16 06:11 PM
-1

This should be higher. I would rather see statistics interspersed with some representative examples rather than several anecdotes.
/r/MensRights03/01/16 04:26 PM
1

I have much more success speaking to people in the real world.
/r/MensRights27/12/15 03:01 PM
2

WTF is wrong with you all that every time a woman doesn't get free shit, it's a violation? I was responding specifically to in some states, they make it harder than that. Some states do put an unreasonable burden on people who want to get abortions.
/r/MensRights27/12/15 03:00 PM
2

I do wonder how I obtained the mistaken notion that a man's only proper role in the debate is to shut-up and do as he's told. As do I. That's not true and you really shouldn't sell yourself nor your point-of-view short.
/r/MensRights27/12/15 02:06 AM
3

That's totally untrue. Plenty of people are very passionately pro-choice and want absolutely no part in gender wars.
/r/MensRights27/12/15 01:15 AM
3

and who is "somebody" here? All women?
/r/MensRights27/12/15 01:03 AM
2

Where do you draw the line between trying to help someone and forcing something onto them that they don't want? If an adult says to you that she unequivocally wants a procedure performed, isn't it awfully paternalistic to say "oh, you might be confused right now so I'm going to make you go through an invasive and unnecessary procedure so that you really think about this."
/r/MensRights26/12/15 11:50 PM
2

That's a far better procedure than forcing someone to endure an unwanted transvaginal ultrasound.
/r/MensRights26/12/15 11:03 PM
5

So you're saying that posts on TwoX constitute a "vast" number of parents?
/r/MensRights26/12/15 06:08 PM
9

I'm glad that you both made the decision that was right for you.
/r/MensRights26/12/15 06:02 PM
6

Considering you bolded "vast," I hope you won't mind answering some questions. What is vast here? A certain percentage or an absolute number? Do you have proof to back up this claim?
/r/MensRights26/12/15 06:01 PM
7

What, do you think people walk in on a whim and say "I'll have one abortion please?" You make it sound like it's such a trivial decision when nothing could be further from the truth. By the time someone has come in, the chances are that person has already tirelessly pondered the alternatives and opted to abort. A transvaginal ultrasound provides no new information; all it does is make the process that much more needlessly unpleasant.
/r/MensRights26/12/15 05:05 PM
14

Because people haven't already made up their minds by the time they walk in the door and ask for the procedure?
/r/MensRights26/12/15 04:59 PM
58

The problem is she can't get an abortion without filling-out a form and paying-out some money. And, in some states, they make it harder than that. So that's intolerable oppression and we should all cry a bunch of male tears onto the floor in sympathy. Why shouldn't we? Forcing people to go through an unpleasant and entirely unnecessary medical procedure before they are allowed to make up their minds about their own bodies is ridiculous. Everyone is entitled to bodily autonomy. Acknowledging this…
/r/MensRights26/12/15 03:55 PM
38

Nobody else made that choice for you either. That's just genetics.
/r/MensRights26/12/15 03:50 PM
6

Everyone is entitled to a trial.
/r/MensRights12/12/15 05:15 AM
1

Ooooo juicy. Got links to the jokes he made?
/r/MensRights13/11/15 02:44 AM
2

Is this real? The guy from Jeopardy??
/r/MensRights12/11/15 10:54 PM
14

Lets be happy that a major world power has taken a step in the right direction.
/r/MensRights02/11/15 01:45 AM
-1

Proof of rape apology was asked for and given.
/r/MensRights24/10/15 09:51 PM
-1

LOL Again!
/r/MensRights24/10/15 08:55 PM
-1

clap Again, dance!
/r/MensRights24/10/15 08:49 PM
–

keep going. This is amusing.
/r/MensRights24/10/15 08:42 PM
3

.....what?
/r/MensRights24/10/15 08:40 PM
0

I'm not going anywhere. People all over this thread have pointed out that MensRights doesn't try to silence minority viewpoints, so I'm going to stay right here. Also, if you want to vent, there's always /r/MensRants.
/r/MensRights24/10/15 08:31 PM
3

Fellow subscribers to /r/MensRights, this is a request. Please help to ensure that our movement is seen in a positive light. OP isn't dictating anything. He's clearly asking people to help elevate the level of discourse here.
/r/MensRights24/10/15 08:26 PM
-1

owned? hardly lol XD
/r/MensRights24/10/15 08:24 PM
1

Another person who didn't read the whole thing. "rape play" and "rape fantasies" are some of the most popular groups for women on sites like fetlife.com so it can't be all bad. and But you don't get an erection when some horrifying violation is happening to you. "But it's an involuntary reaction" - no. If she's attractive enough to make you hard, then it's not a violation and you have no right to complain about it.
/r/MensRights24/10/15 08:22 PM
-1

Who is talking about censorship?
/r/MensRights24/10/15 08:20 PM
2

If anything, the bit where he states erection = automatic consent is closer to rape apology. Excellent point. Thanks for reminding me.
/r/MensRights24/10/15 07:08 PM
–

Meh. No matter what, people are going to view us as a hate movement, so why NOT bash feminism while we fight for men's rights? People are going to view us as a hate movement....so we might as well be one? What??
/r/MensRights24/10/15 06:28 PM
1

Surprisingly well written for a publication that often churns out garbage.
/r/MensRights24/10/15 06:23 PM
3

Explain again how comments in this echo chamber that just take shots at feminism produce tangible results.
/r/MensRights24/10/15 06:11 PM
-2

Hey, I understand it was a long read and you probably didn't get to everything but I'm talking specifically about this: "rape play" and "rape fantasies" are some of the most popular groups for women on sites like fetlife.com so it can't be all bad. EDIT more goodies But you don't get an erection when some horrifying violation is happening to you. "But it's an involuntary reaction" - no. If she's attractive enough to make you hard, then it's not a violation and you have no right to complain about…
/r/MensRights24/10/15 05:59 PM
0

Please don't. We need some people here who can get above the jerk.
/r/MensRights24/10/15 05:10 PM
-4

Nobody here apologizes for rape. Get lost. Not true. I've seen it quite a few times.
/r/MensRights24/10/15 05:09 PM
2

We can challenge people who say things like OP is describing. That would go a long way.
/r/MensRights24/10/15 05:08 PM
–

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/3ojc8h/student_wrongfully_expelled_for_rape_triumphs_in/cvxvr33 You want an example, here you go. Full disclosure, the parent post has been downvoted into oblivion, but it was mid-level positive when I wrote the first reply. You'll need to look a few levels down for the rape apologia. EDIT: Because people aren't seeing the stuff at the end "rape play" and "rape fantasies" are some of the most popular groups for women on sites like fetlife.com so it ca…
/r/MensRights24/10/15 05:05 PM
–

Oh for god's sake, any time anyone posts a criticism of the discussion here there's always someone who raises a pitchfork and shouts that someone is trying to censor him. Nobody is trying to censor you.
/r/MensRights24/10/15 05:02 PM
0

Accusations are direct and not implications.
/r/MensRights24/10/15 04:52 PM
–

You re-read the article This is not the same as accusing him of being a misogynist.
/r/MensRights24/10/15 12:52 PM
74

Linked article does not say this at all. Your editorializing has no basis in the article. She never once accused him of being a misogynist.
/r/MensRights24/10/15 03:18 AM
1

Well this isn't a DAG. Also graphs can have start states, such as graphs used for searches.
/r/MensRights23/10/15 02:58 AM
1

This is a directed cyclic graph with no start state
/r/MensRights23/10/15 02:38 AM
0

I think he did a very very poor job in the beginning with his broad generalizations about women. If he had the stats to back that up then fine, but speaking in such generalities without citing any evidence made him look foolish.
/r/MensRights22/10/15 09:44 PM
14

Depends where.
/r/MensRights22/10/15 09:38 PM
4

I would combine the second and third one with an or
/r/MensRights22/10/15 04:52 PM
10

I think every Korean man I know would describe the military as a disruptive element in their lives In every case they had to leave their education and SOs to spend two years in the military. None of them wanted to go but they had to go. I don't think a single one would describe it as fun.
/r/MensRights22/10/15 01:03 PM
7

What do they outwardly say about it though?
/r/MensRights22/10/15 04:43 AM
31

mandatory military conscription to be extended from 2 to 5 years for men. How is this a feminist issue?
/r/MensRights22/10/15 04:21 AM
7

Believe it or not, disagreeing with you doesn't mean someone doesn't deserve to exist.
/r/MensRights21/10/15 11:49 PM
3

Red car.....red suspenders.......huh!????
/r/MensRights21/10/15 11:47 PM
1

I'm not talking about this case; I'm speaking in the abstract.
/r/MensRights21/10/15 07:41 PM
6

Disgusting how more and more college students think that their time in college should be spent insulating themselves from different and opposing ideas.
/r/MensRights21/10/15 05:16 PM
11

1: Many universities have single rooms for students 2: A person can be raped silently if he or she is drugged or otherwise unconscious (and remains unconscious) I'm not arguing that the alleged rape did or didn't happen, but we should be honest with our information.
/r/MensRights21/10/15 05:14 PM
3

Wait, not even "most abusers are men" but "most men are abusers?" Wow.
/r/MensRights20/10/15 08:25 PM
-4

oh my god who cares
/r/MensRights20/10/15 04:36 PM
4

Can you really be that stupid? "I totally didn't send that letter. Let me pull it up on screen and focus on it with my camera"
/r/MensRights19/10/15 03:41 AM
1

...did you reply to the wrong comment? What are you even talking about?
/r/MensRights19/10/15 12:05 AM
1

/u/Tomppeli gave a few good examples, like custody disputes, where equality could be a zero-sum game, but this isn't always true. Eliminating male stereotypes and gender roles for men, for example, can be done without any damage to the work feminism has done to tackle female stereotypes and gender roles for women.
/r/MensRights18/10/15 02:16 PM
3

climate change was caused by patriarchy so ya
/r/MensRights18/10/15 02:06 PM
6

Hey just so you know, your first name is visible in your picture. You probably don't care, but in the off chance that you do....
/r/MensRights17/10/15 11:32 PM
1

Yup. Anyone encouraged to do more research after seeing this movie will likely find themselves in that hive of scum and villainy.
/r/MensRights17/10/15 11:31 PM
9

Maybe someone was in the women's room when she went in?
/r/MensRights17/10/15 11:04 PM
3

Check out Dr. Farrell's role reversal date study. Sounds interesting, though I could only find details on Return of Kings. Would you happen to know a more reputable source?
/r/MensRights17/10/15 03:18 AM
1

But you don't get an erection when some horrifying violation is happening to you. "But it's an involuntary reaction" - no. If she's attractive enough to make you hard, then it's not a violation and you have no right to complain about it. I guess every time you've gotten an erection you've made a conscious choice? Or are you saying that finding someone attractive is the same thing as consenting to sex with them? I'm not even going to respond to the rest of your diatribe.
/r/MensRights15/10/15 10:08 PM
1

Not this again. There is nothing here that challenges gender as a social construct. Sex is related to DNA; gender is a social construct.
/r/MensRights15/10/15 01:19 PM
3

How about we teach people not to vindictively file false reports? Not very often you say? Well, if one M&M in 100.....
/r/MensRights15/10/15 01:15 PM
–

all laws are bullshit?
/r/MensRights15/10/15 01:01 PM
1

Man the father of that kid that was raped by the babysitter just enrages me
/r/MensRights15/10/15 12:00 AM
0

Are you being intentionally obtuse, or are you actually this stupid? No rape conviction is possible. Then why do you feel the need to invent specific scenarios, and then argue that they should be generalized. If no (fair) rape conviction is possible, then surely you can explain that for any scenario anyone can come up with. Also, out of curiosity, why did you change my hypothetical rape victim to a woman? But wrongly convicting someone of rape is a far worse injustice than rape. There is no need…
/r/MensRights14/10/15 11:51 PM
0

"I know a broke into his house with a knife, broke some things and stole others, but he and I had consensual sex!"
/r/MensRights14/10/15 12:54 PM
13

"The fact that you got so angry and tried to turn this into a character assassination says a lot about you" "You're a raging neckbeard" lol do you have any self awareness at all?
/r/MensRights13/10/15 01:31 PM
1

How many is "some people?" Honestly there's objectionable content highly upvoted every single day.
/r/MensRights13/10/15 01:30 PM
2

Beautiful.
/r/MensRights13/10/15 01:29 PM
6

Who are you kidding? True victims could provide all sorts of evidence to prove that they were raped.
/r/MensRights13/10/15 01:27 PM
1

That's probably a good idea. Thanks.
/r/MensRights12/10/15 03:01 PM
5

the first edit has been deleted, however: 1: I didn't "throw the entire movement under the bus" but merely commented that these are the kinds of threads that people point to when they talk about the MRM being anti-trans, especially when said threads are near the top of the comments sections as this one was. 2: Hurt my feels? What?
/r/MensRights11/10/15 08:49 PM
8

It was the second-highest reply when I commented. Calm down. Keep in mind that the vote totals as you see them now aren't the same as when comments were posted. Furthermore, nobody anywhere said anything should be censored.
/r/MensRights11/10/15 07:26 PM
9

Discrimination is targeted at the people that are hurt by it, not its beneficiaries.
/r/MensRights11/10/15 04:00 PM
3

A hard requirement of being a man is in fact to be male. Similarly, in order to be a woman, you must first be female. Your opinion, not supportable by any sort of proof
/r/MensRights11/10/15 03:01 PM
23

A trans woman is a woman too.
/r/MensRights11/10/15 01:38 PM
39

A trans man is a man EDIT2: Glad reason finally prevailed here.
/r/MensRights11/10/15 01:36 PM
14

That's for when you're in your teens or in college. After that it changed to 1: Have $$$ 2: Don't not have $$$
/r/MensRights09/10/15 01:11 PM
18

Civil suit for damages ?
/r/MensRights09/10/15 01:05 PM
1

You already have the right to "demand" an abortion. That's free speech. You don't, and shouldn't, have the right to force people to get abortions against their will.
/r/MensRights06/10/15 01:12 PM
1

Whether it should or shouldn't is unfortunately immaterial here. What matters is what the current policy is.
/r/MensRights05/10/15 04:22 PM
2

The United States government provides benefits to couples whom are legally married, such as tax breaks. All this would do is force all residents of Alabama who want a legal marriage (i.e. one recognized by the government) to go to neighboring states.
/r/MensRights05/10/15 03:49 PM
4

I think we're taking the wrong side of this. Same-sex couples in Alabama are entitled to marry. Among them are men whose rights were, until recently, restricted by the laws in their state. While Alabama's latest move won't prevent them from going to a neighboring state and getting married, the move is clearly intended to make it more difficult for men (and women) in same-sex couples to exercise their rights under the 14th amendment as per the supreme court's decision. Alabama is doing whatever i…
/r/MensRights05/10/15 03:20 PM
-6

"Feminazi" "feminist in chief" "feminist goon squads" are you for real?
/r/MensRights05/10/15 03:15 PM
13

Someone who worked for Regan and Nixon, and, until recently, served as a senior adviser to Donald Trump's campaign alleges that a Democrat is an abusive spouse. I think I'm going to need more evidence.
/r/MensRights05/10/15 12:55 AM
5

Destroying the family is a key step for the left. ?? what are you talking about ??
/r/MensRights04/10/15 08:39 PM
0

Nah, I don't. That's really weird though.
/r/MensRights04/10/15 12:48 AM
1

Oh, is it? It showed up at the top of my front page.
/r/MensRights04/10/15 12:41 AM
–

Seriously? This is what passes for front page content in this sub?
/r/MensRights04/10/15 12:38 AM
0

And next week you'll complain that men are judged by their height
/r/MensRights04/10/15 12:06 AM
2

The hell is a chad?
/r/MensRights02/10/15 01:25 PM
2

No need to be pedantic; you know exactly what I meant.
/r/MensRights02/10/15 03:45 AM
1

What the fuck did I just read?
/r/MensRights02/10/15 02:38 AM
37

Don't really understand the upvotes here. Why the hell do you think MRAs would be opposed to women's suffrage? All people have the right to vote.
/r/MensRights01/10/15 09:50 PM
2

Except Donald Trump doesn't know that all those men have foot injuries. In which foot? Check the records yourself, loser.
/r/MensRights01/10/15 06:13 PM
2

..........oh, what a shock
/r/MensRights01/10/15 05:22 PM
3

Feminism doesn't solve problems. It creates problems. Ultimately I could see gender segregation becoming the norm again. Maybe even quasi-"patriarchal" institutions re-introduced as a backlash to insane feminist policies. As a backlash? How about because of? Paradoxically, some radicals push for separate "male and female spaces" in an effort to diminish sexism.
/r/MensRights01/10/15 05:18 PM
-7

All in all: We are displaying similar logical problems as feminism. My biggest problem with some of the discussion in this sub, right here in a succinct sentence.
/r/MensRights29/09/15 10:22 PM
3

I don't know if I fit the "rabid feminist" opinion you're looking for, but in my feminist opinion, the treatment of male rape victims is a product of the societal belief that men are more "in charge" of sex than women are, and that men aren't as 'weak' or as easily persuaded to do things they don't want to do - aren't as easily taken advantage of. As a result, we don't see teenage boys who are victims of sexual assault as true victims, even though they clearly are and should be considered as suc…
/r/MensRights29/09/15 10:15 PM
3

Men get mad due to fragile masculinity. Women get mad because then it makes sense. slash s
/r/MensRights26/09/15 08:59 PM
1

If your dad is innocent, this would totally fall apart at trial. Not only that, if you sue the accuser for damages and she can't cough up the video, I think you'll have a relatively easy time.
/r/MensRights25/09/15 01:04 PM
11

Why are they all clapping at the end?
/r/MensRights25/09/15 01:01 PM
2

LOL @ the person you replied to. Tried to bring politics into this and just got burned.
/r/MensRights24/09/15 02:36 PM
2

I remember flying as a kid, the check-in agent would ask my parents if they wanted me seated next to a woman instead.
/r/MensRights20/09/15 06:22 PM
-2

Why bother with the neutral post-title if all you wanted to do was come in here and give a speech?
/r/MensRights19/09/15 12:49 AM
2

MensLivesMatter
/r/MensRights18/09/15 08:24 PM
3

It's a nonsensical cheap shot. You only prove our detractors right by doing stuff like this.
/r/MensRights18/09/15 03:55 PM
2

What the fuck are you talking about
/r/MensRights18/09/15 03:12 PM
2

I am not personally responsible for anything I say.
/r/MensRights17/09/15 08:25 PM
0

I'm not sure what your point is. If a woman slips drugs to a man and then has sex with him while he is unconscious or otherwise able to consent, she isn't a rapist?
/r/MensRights10/09/15 02:21 AM
2

See, this is why I have you RES-tagged as GOOD MRA The article suggests that we should change rape laws that require physical force be applied in order for unwanted sex to be considered "rape." A good deal of people are forced to have sex while drugged, or while being otherwise coerced. Many of the stories we see on this subreddit about men being raped contain stories of men who were not physically forced, but rather drugged or coerced. I really don't understand the outrage here.
/r/MensRights09/09/15 08:42 PM
-5

So the hypocrisy exists in your head? This suggests a problem with the person doing the imagining and nothing else. If you want to talk about hypocrisy, find some real examples from the real world
/r/MensRights09/09/15 08:04 PM
-9

What hypocrisy exactly? You can't just make up some scenario in your head, then point to that scenario as evidence of hypocrisy.
/r/MensRights09/09/15 06:02 PM
3

come on OP look it up! LOOK IT UP!!!!
/r/MensRights08/09/15 02:48 PM
2

Columbia University is a private institution and is thus not covered by the First Amendment. Nungesser's suit against Columbia has nothing to do with Sulkowicz's right to freedom of speech, but has everytihng to do with Columbia unfairly and unevenly enforcing their own rules to allow Sulkowicz to defame and ostracize him.
/r/MensRights02/09/15 03:39 AM
5

Newspeak
/r/MensRights01/09/15 03:09 AM
2

Seemed like they were saying that a transgendered person transitions physically, but throughout maintains their chosen gender. That doesn't seem circular to me.
/r/MensRights01/09/15 12:39 AM
4

Seems pretty fair honestly. Anything you want to point out that you think some of us might miss?
/r/MensRights01/09/15 12:05 AM
6

Is your goal to gain custody of the potential child or to release yourself from any legal obligation?
/r/MensRights30/08/15 07:29 PM
9

Keep downvoting this guy everyone. He wants data!! EDIT: Glad everyone came to their senses...
/r/MensRights30/08/15 04:17 PM
1

Intelligence is the number one factor for me...
/r/MensRights29/08/15 07:04 PM
1

Okay, so it wasn't really a first date. Sounds like you did the right thing.
/r/MensRights29/08/15 03:45 PM
2

doubleplusgood comment.
/r/MensRights29/08/15 03:12 PM
2

I don't think it's so far-fetched for a guy, considering this ridiculous cultural expectation, to think that a woman paying for the entire first date is a sign that she's not interested. They absolutely have no right to get angry at you, but if you are still interested in them and just wanted to pay the check, maybe you could suggest to them some other way that you're still interested.
/r/MensRights29/08/15 03:07 PM
5

“The man should pay on the first date, always. It’s meant to set the tone—that this is and was a date, not a networking opportunity or a new friendship,” founder of online dating concierge service eFlirt and author of “Love @ First Click,” told Salon. “It speaks to a man’s values and shows that he is a gentleman. Delicious circular logic.
/r/MensRights29/08/15 03:02 PM
3

holy fuck...thanks for the reply
/r/MensRights29/08/15 02:27 AM
–

Donald Trump
/r/MensRights28/08/15 11:18 PM
2

Some of these are better than others, and quite a few are duplicates.
/r/MensRights28/08/15 06:02 PM
3

Not every single organization needs to serve everyone, though I'm pretty sure you're being sarcastic.
/r/MensRights28/08/15 05:59 PM
2

What kinds of issues would you say your wife faces in Japan? (If you don't mind sharing)
/r/MensRights28/08/15 05:57 PM
1

Ridiculous hyperbole is good when it creates discourse that didn't previously exist? What good could come out of majorly misrepresenting the truth?
/r/MensRights28/08/15 01:56 AM
1

I dunno, with all that's coming out about the company's mission to fake female accounts, I hardly think the co-founder is a trustworthy source for this.
/r/MensRights27/08/15 02:39 PM
6

How exactly is that a good thing? The level of discourse is lowered when people start throwing out ridiculous hyperbole like this.
/r/MensRights27/08/15 11:33 AM
1

no no not a suggestion a """microaggression"""
/r/MensRights27/08/15 11:30 AM
1

Sorry, you're right. I deal with too many confrontational people on here.
/r/MensRights25/08/15 08:22 PM
1

If they had fake accounts (which I'm sure they did) then it would make sense that they would have many many more fake female accounts, so you're making my point for me.
/r/MensRights25/08/15 06:05 PM
4

Someone had some graphs in DataIsBeautiful the other day that said 1/10. I guess it's hard to determine since he website had a large number of fake accounts, and I would posit that most of them are fake female accounts.
/r/MensRights25/08/15 02:06 PM
0

I'm pretty sure it was 1 in 10
/r/MensRights25/08/15 12:36 PM
11

The woman across from me has her bag on the seat next to her, so I stepped on her foot.
/r/MensRights25/08/15 12:06 AM
1

Has data from EstablishedMen been released?
/r/MensRights23/08/15 02:53 PM
1

"The feminist church" and "liberals" are hardly specific. All I see are people who expressed support for planned parenthood which is an organization that has done a lot of good.
/r/MensRights22/08/15 02:36 PM
1

Who reveres Margaret Sanger exactly?
/r/MensRights22/08/15 05:01 AM
2

I dunno about that last part. Most of the Post's readership would probably like that joke.
/r/MensRights20/08/15 08:03 PM
2

Nobody is talking about censorship. What people want is consistency
/r/MensRights20/08/15 04:25 PM
-1

And?
/r/MensRights19/08/15 05:22 PM
1

The kids shouldn't be tools in OP's dispute with his wife.
/r/MensRights19/08/15 01:16 PM
1

Let's go picket against these prehistoric barbarians!!!!!!!!
/r/MensRights18/08/15 09:38 PM
2

That's the one! Thanks!
/r/MensRights16/08/15 11:39 PM
12

Another factor to consider is that pretending as though "nice guys" are really just devious assholes allows women to deflect responsibility for their role in sexual selection. The brutal truth is that females do not always sexually reward characteristics associated with societal health; they reward strength (they often call this "confidence"), which can be positive but can also be very negative (psychopaths, thugs and bad boys project strength, but cause immeasurable harm to society). This is th…
/r/MensRights16/08/15 06:13 PM
1

Can you provide an example unrelated to college campuses that shows the 'left' "promoting the notion that the presumption of innocence does not apply to sexual assault?"
/r/MensRights16/08/15 06:07 PM
2

200%?
/r/MensRights12/08/15 11:44 AM
10

We really don't know whether or not any of the grievances in the signers' comments hold any water. At face value, however, trying to remove someone from the bench for being a "fathers' rights activist" is pretty shitty.
/r/MensRights10/08/15 11:52 PM
1

No no, feel free to tell us how you really feel.
/r/MensRights03/08/15 12:02 PM
1

What are some of the ways that men express emotions?
/r/MensRights28/07/15 01:11 PM
1

A castle can be said to have two parts to it, the moat and the bailey. The moat contains the center of the castle, whereas the bailey is home to the far-reaching surrounding fields. The moat and bailey strategy works like this. I claim that all men are sick and disgusting perverts and then you challenge me on it. I retreat back to the moat and say "oh no no no, all I was saying is ' what is the world coming to?!!?!?!?'". But as soon as you back off, I return to the bailey and back to my original…
/r/MensRights26/07/15 04:47 PM
1

Classic moat and bailey strategy.
/r/MensRights25/07/15 12:35 AM
-2

The very source you cited claims that what she said is not what's quoted in the thread title.
/r/MensRights24/07/15 11:47 AM
6

Your source is complete and utter shit, and Hillary Clinton never said this.
/r/MensRights24/07/15 03:45 AM
1

What are you suggesting?
/r/MensRights21/07/15 12:22 PM
2

Why does someone always have to make it political?
/r/MensRights20/07/15 11:19 PM
-6

I appreciate your efforts to elevate the discussion here, even if it nets you downvotes.
/r/MensRights20/07/15 10:23 PM
2

I've never used Uber and that's a really illuminating point. Thank you.
/r/MensRights19/07/15 02:19 PM
3

and so what if it is? If feminists accomplish something that we want, we should be happy.
/r/MensRights19/07/15 05:56 AM
3

I don't really see any convincing evidence one way or the other. The fact that he's named and she isn't is bullshit, but I wouldn't go so far as to say that he is lying or she is lying.
/r/MensRights19/07/15 05:55 AM
2

Hey everyone, I know my daughter used a fake name for some reason or another, but I'm going to shout her name a few times REALLY LOUDLY in the comments???? OK!!!!???
/r/MensRights19/07/15 05:50 AM
-2

/r/MensRants
/r/MensRights16/07/15 06:02 PM
1

We're not going to be deleted.
/r/MensRights16/07/15 12:27 PM
–

Can we please not post this sort of red pill garbage?
/r/MensRights14/07/15 12:14 AM
8

Here is the real video. Thanks for providing the actual source, less the red pill bullshit.
/r/MensRights14/07/15 12:14 AM
4

What campaign is this a part of exactly? Do we know this poster is even real?
/r/MensRights13/07/15 12:04 PM
1

You're absolutely right, however the person I replied to seems to believe that no case of statutory rape is really rape when he or she declares "the notion that statutory rape is rape" as "bullshit."
/r/MensRights12/07/15 07:39 PM
3

When reddit was new you could claim to be a men's rights advocate without people assuming that you're a misogynist there are still moderates on both sides who could work together like before if we would all just quit assuming that ... everyone who's a men's rights advocate wants to revert to a post 2nd wave feminism world Are you saying that these are equivalent? What, in your eyes, was wrong with the post-second-wave world? Would such a desire, if it existed, be misogynistic? If yes, why?
/r/MensRights12/07/15 02:27 PM
3

Oh I couldn't say. Maybe two years?
/r/MensRights12/07/15 01:30 PM
5

You don't think that statutory rape is rape? What about teachers that abuse their authority and have consensual sex with underage students? Let's say a 45 year old teacher has sex with a 13 year old student and both people consented and enjoyed the experience: are you saying that isn't rape?
/r/MensRights12/07/15 01:19 PM
15

You're not above that either, apparently. This whole thread was spawned by somebody thanking you for sharing this video, only for you to interject out of nowhere that this is a "feminist issue." You seem to be implying the same nonsensical claim that we see a lot around here: that any "true" MRA would just be a feminist and wouldn't need a group to advocate for Mens' Rights. If that weren't your intention, why would you respond that way? In short, don't pretend you want to be above the game when…
/r/MensRights12/07/15 01:13 PM
1

I'm not challenging the assertion, but I would like to see some evidence. I thought we were about rational thought here.
/r/MensRights10/07/15 11:26 PM
2

Could you give a citation for your rape claim?
/r/MensRights10/07/15 10:32 PM
5

It really wouldn't be weakening men since everyone would be in the same position. If male or female employees could take maternity or paternity leave, then no one can use "she might take maternity leave" as an excuse not to hire someone. How is this not a win for everyone?
/r/MensRights10/07/15 04:12 PM
2

wtf?
/r/MensRights10/07/15 12:15 PM
16

In a perfect world that would be the case, but in practice we know this law will be used almost exclusively against men. Remember there are educated, well-meaning people out there who genuinely believe that a woman can't rape a man.
/r/MensRights10/07/15 12:10 PM
2

domestic violence? EL OH EL!
/r/MensRights09/07/15 12:05 PM
0

So, if by your own admission this movie is being reacted to appropriately, then how is this a Mens' Rights issue?
/r/MensRights07/07/15 12:37 PM
2

Well what's we're seeing here is a good thing; there should be no outcry for something like this. Do any of you really mind that this movie exists, or that a lot of women want to see it?
/r/MensRights06/07/15 03:01 PM
3

I think the original comment is referring to a stranger-stranger dynamic rather than a relationship
/r/MensRights02/07/15 12:13 PM
1

So then do you find the entire subject of this thread moot? Surely the people in the linked thread that say the poster wasn't raped are also encouraging debate and discussion, right?
/r/MensRights01/07/15 10:44 PM
15

Not with that attitude
/r/MensRights01/07/15 02:32 AM
107

You did derail that conversation. That question was about how men can be used to serve the best interests of those groups. You're an asshole for suggesting that those same men might actually have issues of their own. /s
/r/MensRights30/06/15 11:11 PM
1

And quite a few of them sounded like they were reading prepared responses.
/r/MensRights30/06/15 11:09 PM
1

So in essence the entire headline is incorrect.
/r/MensRights30/06/15 11:05 PM
-2

I'm glad you read the article. It started when the teacher was made aware of the situation. There isn't a thing in there that suggests that he was treated this way because he's male. Female students have faced similar treatment for their religious beliefs. This is not a Mens' Rights issue, it's a religious freedom issue.
/r/MensRights28/06/15 07:19 PM
-2

A place that would punish a child for being an atheist would do so regardless of the child's gender.
/r/MensRights28/06/15 06:49 PM
2

Surely those are the times of year right before finals when students would be researching "patriarchy" inversely, fewer people are looking for them when colleges are on break.
/r/MensRights27/06/15 01:24 PM
1

She actually broke her arm filming this scene.
/r/MensRights23/06/15 01:59 AM
10

Both very important takeaways from this study. Everyone is affected by online harassment, and so John Oliver making it a gendered issue is, at best, disingenuous.
/r/MensRights22/06/15 10:32 PM
14

Love isn't measured by how much money you spend.
/r/MensRights22/06/15 01:21 PM
2

Was senator Gillibrand responsible for that?
/r/MensRights22/06/15 01:15 PM
4

That's not all he said. Read his whole hyperbolic and hateful comment.
/r/MensRights22/06/15 01:12 PM
-1

No, it's okay, don't hold back, tell us how you really feel.
/r/MensRights20/06/15 11:35 PM
5

Seriously?
/r/MensRights20/06/15 11:26 PM
1

That's kind of my point though. You cant just take anything a person says and claim that's the opinion of all the groups they belong to; you have to see how that group reacts.
/r/MensRights20/06/15 07:49 PM
–

Evidence is a tool of the patriarchy. It would be funny if people didn't actually say things like this.
/r/MensRights20/06/15 04:54 PM
1

That's absolutely true, but claiming that anything Sarkeesian or any other feminist does as representative of the entire group is equally fallacious. He posted something that wasn't popular with the movement (and rightfully so) and was downvoted for it. Turning that into "MRAs want to politicize the Charleston shooting" requires quite a bit of mental gymnastics.
/r/MensRights20/06/15 04:42 PM
4

"Person submits offensive comment to subreddit, gets downvoted to oblivion: does the entire movement agree with him?" what nonsense
/r/MensRights20/06/15 04:08 AM
9

It's the No True Scottsman fallacy. I've been told that for my beliefs I should label myself as a feminist because feminism is supposedly working to solve men's issues, and any feminist that proposes or actually carries out violence against men is not a "true feminist". Clearly enough people have found enough problems in modern feminism to distance themselves from it. This, of course, doesn't mean that all feminists are evil -- far from it -- but it does suggest that there is a sizable and vocal…
/r/MensRights20/06/15 04:04 AM
1

I'm for men's rights and a liberal. There, you're wrong.
/r/MensRights17/06/15 11:32 PM
3

Thier*
/r/MensRights16/06/15 03:08 AM
13

Hm, last time I checked, Men's Rights Activists advocate on behalf of all men. Is this commenter implying that gay men, trans men, and men of color are not men? If they aren't men then what are they? Just because they aren't straight cis white makes doesn't mean they're not men. This commenter needs to learn to accept people as they are.
/r/MensRights15/06/15 10:51 PM
34

These are all different people. You'd be highlighting a double standard if you found the same people saying both things.
/r/MensRights14/06/15 10:35 PM
1

That's a fair point. Thank you.
/r/MensRights13/06/15 02:13 AM
1

That's a very well reasoned argument but surprisingly I'm still unconvinced.
/r/MensRights12/06/15 07:39 PM
1

Yes it does, as their perception of their own gender is the only deciding factor in what their gender is.
/r/MensRights12/06/15 06:21 PM
-1

You're really adding to the conversation 👍🏻
/r/MensRights12/06/15 04:20 PM
-1

So you think transmen should use the lady's room and transwomen the men's room? If not then what's the difference?
/r/MensRights12/06/15 04:18 PM
-1

We have enough real issues to address that we don't need to fight against hypotheticals.
/r/MensRights12/06/15 03:18 PM
1

This is a pretty fucked up law. If the frats want to hold parties and invite women and the women want to go to them, then it's ridiculous for any rule or law to ban them from attending. Considering that the rationale is to protect women, then yes this law treats women as if they can't make their own decisions and is thus discriminatory. We should be entirely against this. I honestly don't understand why the vast majority of comments in here express agreement when we would be fucking up-in-arms i…
/r/MensRights12/06/15 01:14 PM
2

Your argument would hold water if the fraternities were the ones imposing the restriction. If the frats want to hold parties and women want to go to them, then the women are not at all "entitled" by stating that this law is discriminatory.
/r/MensRights12/06/15 01:09 PM
2

There are actually sometimes good reasons to get a mastectomy.
/r/MensRights12/06/15 01:06 PM
22

In other news, is water wet? Find out at 11.
/r/MensRights12/06/15 01:05 PM
7

Gender is a protected class.
/r/MensRights12/06/15 12:45 AM
1

A minority of rape cases involve the victim being physically overpowered. Self defense classes teach you the awareness to avoid being drugged or drinking too much.
/r/MensRights12/06/15 12:43 AM
5

Guys, this guy is being ironic. Hold your down votes.
/r/MensRights12/06/15 12:40 AM
8

Ok you're going a little overboard with the rhetoric here.
/r/MensRights11/06/15 12:04 AM
8

Don't you think that perception LONG predates feminism?
/r/MensRights11/06/15 12:04 AM
1

"allegedly arrested" Either they were or they weren't. Stop equivocating and do your research.
/r/MensRights09/06/15 12:00 AM
2

Quality post. Thanks.
/r/MensRights08/06/15 11:54 PM
1

I dunno man, guys don't say it in as many words, but I've seen plenty of men try to disengage from conversations with other men who are trying to open up.
/r/MensRights08/06/15 11:39 PM
0

I don't know what you want me to say. Do you know of an effective way to change the type of people a person is attracted to? I think the only way to fix this in the long term is to present more normal images of men in the media; these kinds of ideas are instilled during childhood and incredibly difficult to shake lose.
/r/MensRights08/06/15 11:22 PM
1

Unfortunately you can't negotiate attraction.
/r/MensRights08/06/15 11:05 PM
4

Plenty of Wall Street bankers take the subway in NYC. The thing is, a lot of them get on the Lexington line in Manhattan, after the relatively less wealthy people board the trains in the Bronx and sit down. What you get is an incredibly packed train on which the less wealthy are seated and the bankers are forced to stand. Not about man spreading but I always found this kinda cool.
/r/MensRights08/06/15 10:53 PM
2

You gotta believe me, I wish you were there, it's a matter of opinion!
/r/MensRights07/06/15 10:05 PM
9

Don't forget the part when she said criticizing the Duggars was akin to spitting on the graves of American service members.
/r/MensRights07/06/15 01:46 PM
2

What the hell are you even talking about? I'm not defending her at all; I just don't believe that anything in this story has anything to do with TRP. Do you have any actual evidence to back up anything you've said in this thread.
/r/MensRights06/06/15 04:44 PM
1

No no see here's the issue: You seem to be fond of making unfounded assumptions about people, and then using those assumptions to argue your point. This story supports your TRP garbage because you assume everyone acted a certain way? I follow her narrative blindly because I said "Can we not?" Stop with the baseless assumptions and head back to your redpill pit of vitriol where you belong.
/r/MensRights06/06/15 04:34 PM
3

Those MRAs are regressive pretenders in our liberal society. Let's do the liberal and totally non-regressive thing and not allow people who disagree with us to have a voice
/r/MensRights06/06/15 03:19 PM
3

Can we not?
/r/MensRights06/06/15 03:14 PM
2

Don't you know? everyone in prison is innocent
/r/MensRights05/06/15 10:41 PM
3

Months
/r/MensRights05/06/15 10:34 PM
7

Wouldn't an evening-out of the percentages also cause the percentage of suicides committed by women to jump towards 50?
/r/MensRights31/05/15 01:13 PM
5

There's an implied "/s" here, right?
/r/MensRights28/05/15 11:18 PM
0

It's funny that she said the train was probably empty because that's usually NOT the case at that time of night.
/r/MensRights28/05/15 11:17 PM
4

Nah man, if you're so convinced they're doing something ban worthy then let them do it themselves.
/r/MensRights26/05/15 12:18 PM
2

So when you said: Game of Thrones just had a woman raping a man you really meant to say that GOT might show a woman raping a man in a future episode.
/r/MensRights22/05/15 08:56 PM
2

Did we watch the same show? She is forcing him to marry her. They didn't have sex.
/r/MensRights22/05/15 08:28 PM
1

Not really rape but I see your point.
/r/MensRights22/05/15 08:22 PM
2

Game of Thrones just had a woman raping a man, did you notice? What was this? EDIT: I guess the Queen and her husband count technically, considering how young he is.
/r/MensRights22/05/15 06:42 PM
1

TIL imbibe
/r/MensRights19/05/15 07:58 PM
8

Group A has belief P. Group B has belief P and Q. -->Group A has belief Q really?
/r/MensRights19/05/15 07:56 PM
9

I may never be able to understand why the Blue Pill is so vicious towards The Red Pill, because I'm not a woman. I can't see it from your point on view. It's the same reason you'll never be able to see it from the man's point of view. Why do you think the dividing line is between men and women. I'm a man and I find TRP disturbing.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/15 06:24 AM
9

No, this is entirely backwards. It's like you're suggesting we hold our support for an issue hostage until we get what we want. You should not be deciding your opinion on an issue based on someone else's opinion on another issue. That's just absurd. I support abortion rights for women, and there is no amount of discrimination against men that will change that.
/r/MensRights14/05/15 03:33 PM
3

Am I the only one here that thinks that this post was perfectly crafted to speak to the issues that we talk about a lot frequently in here? Sorry, but this post just seems a bit too engineered.
/r/MensRights13/05/15 06:37 PM
2

WHAT A FUCKIN SURPRISE
/r/MensRights07/05/15 07:37 PM
1

"man up" in this subreddit? Really?
/r/MensRights04/05/15 12:50 AM
5

lol is this for real
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/15 01:30 AM
3

A woman did a bad thing, but this is NOT a Mens Rights issue
/r/MensRights01/05/15 01:33 PM
5

That's almost word for word what I wanted to post.
/r/MensRights28/04/15 08:33 PM
8

JSYK, you clearly tried to keep the name of the accused out of the post, but it's still in the link at the very bottom.
/r/MensRights27/04/15 04:25 PM
20

Exactly. The complaint says that the DA dropped the case, and then she decided to twist that into her not wanting to pursue it further for various reasons.
/r/MensRights27/04/15 04:22 PM
0

Determining whether or not something is of "that scope" is entirely subjective.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/15 03:41 PM
-2

It matters exactly as much as the person she wants to date thinks it does. If that person is you and you don't care, that's your prerogative. The thread is asking me how I feel personally. If you accept that I believe differently than you do, why are you trying to persuade me?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/15 02:27 PM
0

I'm slow on the uptake because your killer arguments don't have me flocking to your side? You have yet to convince me that it even matters how many people my SO has slept with. You are assuming that after a certain number of partners that it matters, but you've failed to explain where the cutoff is and why I should care. You keep saying a woman who has slept with 100 men is a deal breaker; I am asking you: why? If you are okay with that, your decision. But don't say other have to see it the same…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/15 01:34 PM
-1

So is any other detail of her life that she hasn't chosen to share with me. When she was seven years old, she walked by a yellow car. Did she tell me? No. Is it a "lie by omission?" Maybe, but who cares. The number of people my SO has slept with is irrelevant if she has never lied about it and is safe.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/15 12:17 PM
1

That's all I've been arguing. You're not really disagreeing with me then.
/r/MensRights27/04/15 11:44 AM
7

Let's say you're a man walking in a dark alley at 3AM. Someone jumps out and stabs you and takes all your money. Should you have known better? Probably. Does that mean your attacker should go unpunished? That's just ridiculous.
/r/MensRights27/04/15 11:30 AM
4

If she never lied about it and is STD free then what difference does it make?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/15 11:26 AM
0

I used the same two words other people use (apparently) when discussing another issue therefore I agree with them on that issue...?
/r/MensRights27/04/15 11:19 AM
-22

Straw man argument. Try harder.
/r/MensRights27/04/15 02:26 AM
-19

Your last sentence is a non-sequitur and has no base in anything I have said. You have lost all credibility.
/r/MensRights27/04/15 02:25 AM
–

Just because someone should be aware that the possibility exists doesn't mean the person who carries it out can do so without punishment. This is classic victim blaming.
/r/MensRights27/04/15 01:02 AM
–

Nah, I don't think it's wrong to punish people for uploading nude pics to the Internet without permission.
/r/MensRights26/04/15 11:57 PM
8

What I find interesting is that her response seems carefully crafted to NOT accuse him again.
/r/MensRights24/04/15 12:14 PM
109

It's ridiculous that he would read it as a `bullying strategy,' especially given his continued public attempts to smear my reputation, when really it's just an artistic expression of the personal trauma I've experienced at Columbia. If artists are not allowed to make art that reflect on our experiences, then how are we to heal?' Oh, the irony
/r/MensRights24/04/15 06:04 AM
1

They never said the former. I mean it when I said I would be talking about something completely unrelated when things like this would happen.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/15 07:27 PM
1

More confused than anything else.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/15 06:40 PM
6

I'm bluepill and I detest terms like "alpha", "shittest" and pretty much the entire RP dictionary. However... It has been my observation in my own relationships that opening up only leads downhill. Every GF I've ever had has taken it as some personal affront, even when I'm talking about things totally separate and apart from our relationship. ("You being sad about something else makes me feel like I'm not a good girlfriend.") Personally, I've yet to have an SO that didn't flat-out get angry at m…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/15 06:13 PM
8

Cura te ipsum
/r/MensRights20/02/15 04:20 AM
1

Why would you need a class? It seems like the kind of information you could teach in 30 minutes tops
/r/MensRights19/02/15 05:10 AM
25

Let's make false accusations against innocent people ! ! ! ! ! ! ! oh wait a second...
/r/MensRights17/02/15 07:09 PM
3

They may do things that we strongly disagree with, but labeling feminists with the same title we give groups like Al Qaeda and ISIS is wildly inappropriate.
/r/MensRights13/02/15 07:12 PM
5

This is a joke, right?
/r/MensRights13/02/15 06:43 PM
8

Excellent article.
/r/MensRights09/02/15 09:38 PM
0

That's a good point. It's upsetting that people in here will say that "it's not a zero sum game!!" when defending the MRM but then feel the need to needlessly compare who has it worse.
/r/MensRights09/02/15 02:45 AM
-14

That's you. Just because you have an opinion doesn't make that opinion objective fact.
/r/MensRights09/02/15 02:03 AM
-18

Who are you to say being raped is better than being falsely accused of rape? Seriously, downvotes? Sometimes this sub absolutely disgusts me.
/r/MensRights09/02/15 12:22 AM
2

You agree with me right? No!? Everyone that disagrees with me is wrong you fascist!!!!
/r/MensRights08/02/15 02:09 PM
11

Care to elaborate further? I could think of another group that has tone policing sob stories cognitive dissonance SJWs and it isn't us.
/r/MensRights08/02/15 02:07 PM
1

Unfortunately that's circumstantial evidence.
/r/MensRights08/02/15 02:05 PM
2

The messages themselves do not speak to whether or not something happened the night of the alleged assault. The author is correct on that fact. Just because she hasn't been accused of anything doesn't mean the author is saying women cannot libel/slander
/r/MensRights06/02/15 12:53 PM
5

Good luck telling that to men in China.
/r/MensRights06/02/15 12:46 PM
2

If you think her sweaty feet are the nastiest thing on those seats, then you've never really taken public transit.
/r/MensRights05/02/15 02:48 PM
0

Yup. That's my point.
/r/MensRights05/02/15 02:47 PM
1

I don't see the connection. If they're a democratic body then they can elect whomever they please.
/r/MensRights05/02/15 10:39 AM
2

Why do we care? If that's who they elected then that's who they elected.
/r/MensRights05/02/15 10:12 AM
0

I'm sure anyone that wants to sit down could just ask her to move.
/r/MensRights05/02/15 10:08 AM
1

Call to action: Kermit Elementary has a history of suspending boys for ridiculous things. This last episode takes the cake. Here’s what we can do. K i l l Kill OP just got expelled
/r/MensRights02/02/15 06:04 PM
1

Hey, there's already a thread about this article on the front page of the subreddit.
/r/MensRights02/02/15 04:02 AM
15

Someday we'll find it the one-ring connection the dwarves the elvish and meeeeee
/r/MensRights01/02/15 09:59 PM
1

But isn't the boy also under sixteen?
/r/MensRights01/02/15 08:37 PM
3

What does "aged under 16" even mean? You could also say "Other cases included a seven-year-old boy who raped a girl aged under 55"
/r/MensRights01/02/15 05:51 PM
2

Thank you, sillymod!
/r/MensRights30/01/15 08:31 PM
1

I would like to see data on how straight men and women rank members of their own gender on this scale.
/r/MensRights30/01/15 06:33 PM
2

I'm a man. You and TRP DO NOT speak for me.
/r/MensRights30/01/15 06:29 PM
1

Do tell
/r/MensRights30/01/15 05:56 PM
9

Every time I begin to lose hope in this sub, I come along a really level-headed comment like this that brightens my spirits. We believe in bodily autonomy for both men and women. Requiring a man's consent for an abortion violates the woman's autonomy. It's as simple as that.
/r/MensRights30/01/15 05:01 PM
9

This has absolutely nothing to do with Mens' rights. This is just some childish, TRP-style rant.
/r/MensRights30/01/15 04:50 PM
5

TRP is leaking...
/r/MensRights30/01/15 04:48 PM
-2

Wow, didn't even take you 25% of your post to prove Goodwin's law. Let me let you in on a secret. "Attacking the feminist paradigm" is going to do fuck all if you do it in this subreddit. Not only is it not constructive, but you're essentially shouting into an echo chamber. Nobody who subscribes here is going to read one of those posts and have their mind changed.
/r/MensRights28/01/15 11:54 PM
3

Thank you for saying this.
/r/MensRights28/01/15 10:13 PM
2

Not really men's rights at all. Still I gotta say: The secret? Show interest. Whodda thunk it?
/r/MensRights28/01/15 10:11 PM
-6

She will get a much lower sentence than a man charged with the same crime would. Do you have a crystal ball over there? Could you tell me tomorrow's MegaMillion's numbers? No? Then don't get upset about what you 'think' is going to happen. If what you say happens, then you have grounds to be upset and call "pussy pass." Until then, reserve your own outrage until there's actually something to be outraged about.
/r/MensRights28/01/15 07:31 PM
-7

Thank you for being the voice of reason here. They pretty clearly said it was her fault. Yes, they did attempt to use various stresses to rationalize her behavior, but in no way did they imply that any of that excused her. The article makes it pretty damn clear that she is responsible and will be held responsible for her actions.
/r/MensRights28/01/15 07:00 PM
4

Have you even seen the movie?
/r/MensRights26/01/15 05:00 PM
1

I don't think we would be too happy about this kind of joke directed at men, so I see no reason why we should approve of this kind of humor.
/r/MensRights26/01/15 06:09 AM
4

Make a dictionary/hashtable of names. Just pull the top 1,000 or 10,000 female names and then store a corresponding male name as a value.
/r/MensRights25/01/15 04:21 AM
1

What!?!?! NO!
/r/MensRights23/01/15 06:41 PM
7

There are also women that are gay.
/r/MensRights23/01/15 01:40 PM
2

Do you have a source?
/r/MensRights21/01/15 01:12 PM
10

I love this. Can we use this phrase more often?
/r/MensRights20/01/15 06:55 PM
2

Could you link to other examples of erdley's journalistic incompetence?
/r/MensRights20/01/15 02:39 PM
5

Doing this requires us to accept that advocating directly for men's issues won't get us anywhere. Resorting to this kind of tactic requires us to accept the assumption that men do not need any sort of consideration. Men, as a group themselves, deserve the same thought that any other group does. Don't give in to SJW tactics and try to use "unprivileged" subgroups of men to advocate for our cause. When you become obsessed with the enemy, you become the enemy Don't use their own tactics against the…
/r/MensRights17/01/15 08:20 PM
3

I'm surprised she didn't mention the alarming number of female perpetrators in W_D.
/r/MensRights17/01/15 02:16 AM
1

Link me to where feminists spoke about the Charlie Hebdo shooting.
/r/MensRights15/01/15 06:16 PM
1

Can we please stop the circlejerk about somebody who was 'spared' but still had to watch or listen to her coworkers die? She didn't walk out entirely unscathed, but it almost seems like the commenters here wish she had been killed. In the name of equality? WTF? I honestly can't believe that /r/mensrights is actually using the Charlie Hebdo attack to push an agenda. We should be happy about every single person who walked out of the Charlie Hebdo office and the bakery alive, regardless of gender. …
/r/MensRights15/01/15 04:12 PM
13

Why do we need to decide which one is more or less harmful? Can't we just agree that both circumcision and FGM are wrong?
/r/MensRights15/01/15 04:08 PM
1

I've seen the youtube video blaming Kellogg, but do you have a more reliable source that I can use? Same question for the "cutting up the boy is good for the health of women" statement.
/r/MensRights14/01/15 08:23 PM
3

Also, I think wearing protection is much better at preventing STIs than circumcision anyway.
/r/MensRights14/01/15 06:51 PM
9

I'm a man Care to explain why you wrote several paragraphs when this is all you needed to say?
/r/MensRights10/01/15 11:39 PM
3

The MTA has been playing announcements and displaying graphics for years telling people not to put bags on the seat next to them. That campaign is (and should be) gender neutral. Despite this, the MTA has now decided that men are the only ones who take up more space than they should on the train.
/r/MensRights10/01/15 04:26 PM
3

when in doubt, double down
/r/MensRights10/01/15 04:21 PM
1

Most of those first page results are about this tumblr posts, or are just other shots at MRAs. OF course, the fallacy here is assuming that any news outlet would publish a story with that as part of the title. "Kills man"? We already know that news agencies like to use profession names or other genderless identifiers when referring to men. "woman kills lawyer...", "woman kills fellow New Yorker...." "for rejecting her"? I find it very unlikely that any news outlet would include this in the title…
/r/MensRights10/01/15 04:19 PM
1

LOOK WHAT YOU MADE ME DO
/r/PussyPassDenied09/01/15 07:19 AM
0

This is your stop. Get out.
/r/MensRights06/01/15 03:09 PM
2

Manspreading leads to fear, fear leads to anger, anger leads to hate, hate leads to.....
/r/MensRights06/01/15 03:07 PM
0

me smart. me know greek letters
/r/MensRights03/01/15 03:20 AM
10

I'm sorry but this guy is not beyond reproach. That last line is inappropriate. He could have said that female users should respect his freedom to associate as he respects their right to bodily autonomy. Instead he chose to make a snide comment that can easily be seen as a threat.
/r/MensRights01/01/15 06:26 PM
2

If you have the time, would you mind sourcing these bullets? I think this is a great post and I'd like to use it, but I want to have sources before I do.
/r/MensRights01/01/15 04:21 PM
17

Where is this?
/r/MensRights01/01/15 04:15 PM
1

How is claiming that all rapes reported to college administrations are false better than claiming they are all true?
/r/MensRights30/12/14 08:59 PM
2

I must have missed the part of the article that made excuses for her. Could someone please quote it for me? IMO this article was written in the way that MRAs have always wanted. The two victims were referred to as "boys" and not as "children," and the article seemed to speak with an objective, unapologetic tone when describing the would-be killer. Instead of inventing imaginary slights, why don't we read this article as progress towards our goal of even-handed reporting of female criminals and m…
/r/MensRights30/12/14 04:38 PM
5

/r/NoShitSherlock
/r/MensRights30/12/14 04:32 PM
2

What exactly are you saying? Are you denying that people get raped at all on college campuses?
/r/MensRights30/12/14 01:46 PM
1

Excuse me, would you mind moving over a bit so I can sit down?
/r/MensRights29/12/14 10:39 PM
5

I know, and I appreciate your point.
/r/MensRights29/12/14 07:27 AM
10

Assault is intent. Battery is harm
/r/MensRights29/12/14 07:16 AM
1

Metropolitan Transit Authority, and he lost me at around 1:40. An attempt to make men get up and give up their seats? An attempt to make men ride the subway less? Those two claims are just absurd.
/r/MensRights27/12/14 02:04 AM
-1

OP asks a legitimate question and this sub downvotes. That's disappointing.
/r/MensRights27/12/14 02:01 AM
0

risky bumpersticker....what about abortion?
/r/MensRights27/12/14 01:37 AM
7

Or you could politely let her know and NOT violate boundaries by cutting her hair. Try communication. Just a suggestion.
/r/MensRights25/12/14 04:17 AM
5

The money goes to help people. That can only be a good thing.
/r/MensRights23/12/14 12:31 AM
3

This should be higher. I don't see them suggesting anywhere that women are a majority of those suicides. It may be disingenuous to lead with that number, but what harm could come of this company donating some money to address women's mental health issues?
/r/MensRights22/12/14 11:47 PM
1

Someone else watches The Newsroom
/r/MensRights15/12/14 08:22 PM
3

Or maybe that the award givers don't find women's deaths as amusing.
/r/MensRights15/12/14 02:48 PM
1

Thank you for posting this!
/r/MensRights14/12/14 10:31 PM
1

Are you suggesting she had no part in making the story what it is?
/r/MensRights14/12/14 03:38 PM
-10

Can we keep phrases like "hamstering" out of here please?
/r/MensRights11/12/14 03:31 PM
2

I appreciate your ability to reconsider your opinion upon reviewing new evidence.
/r/MensRights04/12/14 02:47 AM
1

Oh and where are you going said the FALSE FALSE FLAG
/r/MensRights03/12/14 01:00 AM
11

Wow, that was a great video and a good perspective. If only it reached as far as the original video did.
/r/MensRights16/11/14 06:13 PM
-4

Fuck you for breaking the circle jerk. We are pissed that this happened and so we are gonna do it to more people danmit!
/r/MensRights23/09/14 03:47 PM
1

She was in her 20s The problem was she told me she actually wanted to talk, as in using vocal cords. Why she made a complete 180 in fifteen seconds is still beyond me.
/r/MensRights20/09/14 10:48 AM
1

Pointing out statistics and discussing frequency is important; pointing to isolated cases that are no greater than "redditor's friend is sexist" doesn't promote or increase awareness about anything, especially considering that the readership of the sub is already "aware".
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/14 10:22 PM
1

Consider how ridiculous the MRM looks when we have to point to individual people's facebook posts to show how "man hating has saturated" our culture. There are larger scale examples of this that convey the point effectively while not making every MRA look like he/she is just whining about shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/14 01:34 PM
4

Honestly, I couldn't care less what your facebook friend's singular opinion is
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/14 12:48 AM
12

BluePill MRA who wishes that /r/MensRights would downvote submissions that sum up to LOOK AT WHAT THIS ONE FEMINIST/FACEBOOK FRIEND OF MINE SAID. THEREFORE INEUQALITY
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/14 07:57 PM
7

That's not fair to say, men and women are equally capable of seeing that what she did was disgusting and illegal. Unless, you have some insight about the jurors that we don't?
/r/MensRights15/09/14 08:21 PM
2

Maybe he does, maybe he doesn't, we don't know based on the information provided.
/r/MensRights14/09/14 05:04 PM
1

You're missing the point; we're saying it's not pandering.
/r/MensRights14/09/14 04:39 PM
2

That's not true.
/r/MensRights14/09/14 02:34 PM
3

Yeah, I find it hard to believe that the guy read this and said "PICK ME TO DIE FIRST" People ITT shouldn't judge his situation based on his appearance; Maybe he gets laid often, and he's letting these girls know that their absurd proposal would mean the death of one of their friends.
/r/MensRights14/09/14 02:25 PM
4

Don't post this ROK rubbish here
/r/MensRights14/09/14 03:05 AM
10

I know, right?
/r/MensRights13/09/14 10:01 PM
14

She gave me her number over Facebook and told me she wanted to talk. I called her number and she didn't pick up, ignored me for weeks, then finally told me that it was creepy for me to call her.
/r/MensRights13/09/14 09:09 PM
26

Hell, I was called a creep for calling a girl after she gave me her number.
/r/MensRights13/09/14 06:25 PM
1

Stabler is the sidekick
/r/MensRights13/09/14 12:37 AM
2

What is the matter with you? You pulled a straw man not once but twice in your short reply. The person you're responding to never said nor suggested any of that.
/r/MensRights11/09/14 10:05 PM
4

Exactly, the attitude that feminism and men's rights are playing a zero sum game is a major problem. This misconception lead your brother, OP, to call you a misogynist, and has apparently lead you here to ask us how to prove misogyny isn't real. Discrimination against men exists. Discrimination against women exists. Men's rights is about revealing and combating the former, not denying the latter.
/r/MensRights07/09/14 06:37 PM
12

Can we try to get OneY added instead?
/r/MensRights07/09/14 04:58 AM
1

I'm so glad you didn't hire her because her bosses who set policy are jerks!
/r/MensRights06/09/14 11:18 PM
6

and why do you bet this?
/r/MensRights06/09/14 11:09 PM
11

She asks me if there;s anything in it with a straight face. I think you made a lot more from this than she meant.
/r/MensRights06/09/14 12:01 PM
0

You are a consistent quality contributor to this sub. Thank you again for such a well thought out post.
/r/MensRights03/09/14 09:37 PM
1

And then he ran into my knife! He ran into my knife ten times!
/r/MensRights01/09/14 05:58 PM
0

Also the default picture of a hax0r
/r/MensRights01/09/14 05:49 PM
0

What she really missed out on in that video is studying all of the street crimes that had women as the aggressors.
/r/MensRights31/08/14 01:46 AM
2

Rights are not a zero sum game. Debunked.
/r/MensRights27/08/14 09:36 PM
2

It's kind of like TRP, You lost me
/r/MensRights26/08/14 09:08 PM
1

How about DXHR's Zhao, she was a main bad guy and the final boss.
/r/MensRights24/08/14 02:30 AM
-53

What exactly are you trying to say here? Do you honestly believe that women only see men as "mealtickets?" That's an awfully cynical view of half the species.
/r/MensRights14/08/14 04:40 PM
2

I think we're in agreement here. My first reply to you was referencing this: http://youtu.be/WO23WBji_Z0
/r/MensRights12/08/14 07:51 PM
10

Think of all the things that men are better at on average. Do you think men are generally made to feel proud and empowered by these things?
/r/MensRights12/08/14 07:38 PM
6

Anything you can do I can do better, I can do anything better than you!
/r/MensRights12/08/14 07:30 PM
10

It seems I inadvertently started an inter-office gender war. Did you? It's not like you put the cards up.
/r/MensRights12/08/14 07:30 PM
3

I understand /u/StirFryTheCats 's question as sometimes there are things in here that are ambiguous or not actually related to men's rights. However, this story is exactly for the reason you pointed out. Well said.
/r/MensRights09/08/14 10:35 PM
4

She ran into my dick! She ran into my dick ten times!
/r/MensRights07/08/14 08:47 PM
-4

Again, I wonder if they say the exact same thing about us.
/r/MensRights26/07/14 03:38 AM
-8

Funny, I bet they say the exact same thing about us.
/r/MensRights26/07/14 03:07 AM
7

I didn't ask whether or not they would get along. I asked if MRA's would be willing to cooperate with feminists.
/r/MensRights26/07/14 12:46 AM
8

Both are rather large groups that can't each be painted with a single brush. The commenter I replied to said feminists are unwilling to cooperate with MRAs. Do you think MRAs are willing to cooperate with feminists?
/r/MensRights26/07/14 12:16 AM
9

Do you think MRA's would be willing to cooperate with feminists?
/r/MensRights25/07/14 11:42 PM
1

Of course the perpetrator is going to say that she didn't want to hurt anyone. She's not saying it because she doesn't see her husband as a human being; she's saying it because she wants sympathy. I agree with /u/christianbrowny , this has little if anything to do with mensrights.
/r/MensRights17/07/14 02:05 AM
17

See you again in Triple Jeopardy, where the punishments can really change!
/r/MensRights16/07/14 03:43 PM
1

Haha I see. I guess the wording kinda threw me off.
/r/MensRights13/07/14 01:30 PM
1

That's a fair point, and it really doesn't contradict what I said initially.
/r/MensRights13/07/14 01:15 PM
1

Could you please explain? To answer your question, no I haven't. However, I have been shadowbanned in the past for downvoting a thread in a sub I subscribe to which was later posted here.
/r/MensRights13/07/14 01:12 PM
0

As someone who disagrees with both at times, I can tell you OP that you will get backlash, especially on reddit, if you openly disagree with the MRM. I've gotten everything from long essays about how wrong I am to snotty one liners, but I've never received nearly as much vitriol from the MRM as I have from feminists I have disagreed with. Slinging acid wins no arguments. There are shitty feminists and MRAs and there are decent and rational feminists and MRAs. It's unfortunate that some are just …
/r/MensRights13/07/14 12:09 PM
3

Look, I like the burgers but I wouldn't want Five Guys making decisions for the entire country either.
/r/MensRights11/07/14 11:03 PM
1

People like me? How presumptuous is it for you to tell me about me? I don't hate anybody. I wouldn't support a private individual choosing not to buy contraception for himself or herself? That's just bullshit; anyone can buy or forgo buying anything for himself or herself.
/r/MensRights09/07/14 12:11 PM
1

So again, if I feel my religious beliefs compel me to enact Shariah law within my corporate holdings as not doing so is too much of a burden, is that acceptable?
/r/MensRights08/07/14 01:59 PM
6

But the entire decision is predicated on the idea that corporations (at least some) can skirt the law if it conflicts with their religious beliefs.
/r/MensRights08/07/14 01:46 PM
9

Do you think large corporations also have religion or just closely held corporations? How would you feel if a closely held corporation declared they would subject their employees to Shariah law because their religion mandates it? You can say that's outside the scope of the decision but this latest ruling has expanded corporate personhood and already opened the doors for corporations to sue for having to not discriminate against LGBT people.
/r/MensRights08/07/14 05:26 AM
9

Do people here believe the hobby lobby decision was great? I'm genuinely curious as to why.
/r/MensRights08/07/14 02:21 AM
1

It's not just people thinking that nudity is shameful. If people wanted to watch porn, they could watch exabytes of porn filled with actors and actresses who knew exactly what they were being filmed for. The draw of revenge porn websites is that one (or more?) of the participants did not consent, and would likely be embarrassed to know they were being fapped to around the world. Knowing that there's somebody out there who is unknowingly being used for masturbation material is part of what turns …
/r/MensRights02/07/14 09:01 PM
-2

I think you've got it backwards. The "bad M&Ms" in the analogy are associated with the vocal, caustic feminists, while the rest are just decent people.
/r/MensRights02/07/14 08:40 PM
1

Maybe you're right. It just rubs me the wrong way, you know?
/r/MensRights27/06/14 08:29 PM
2

I agree with you in that, o course, the media has chosen a name that is flashy and is likely to keep people fixated on their stories about the shooting but I have to disagree with you that the name isn't meant to shame. They could have picked anything including the location of the crime to name him. (I.e. UCSB shooter) but instead they honed in on the fact that he is a virgin. Could you find another example of someone who has been referred to based on motivation? Most of the named perpetrators o…
/r/MensRights27/06/14 04:47 PM
4

Whoa, why would a woman go to her child's doctor's office to "demand" documents, forcing the staff to "yield immediately" and "fork over" the requested files. Don't you think things are a little less confrontational?
/r/MensRights18/06/14 01:10 AM
1

It's not censoring. Reddit is a private company and has every right to remove offensive material from its website as it did with r/, well, you know.
/r/MensRights17/06/14 06:06 PM
1

It was at 4/-3 when I made my comment. I'm glad it has received more positive attention since.
/r/MensRights13/06/14 04:20 PM
–

Talk about an unpopular opinion. I wish more people in here would think like you do.
/r/MensRights13/06/14 02:20 PM
1

That simply hasn't been my experience. From what I've seen, people are wry willing to paint MRM and trp with the same brush and then go on with their lives. It's also much easier when groups like the southern poverty law center classifies MRM as a single, unified hate group.
/r/MensRights03/06/14 11:40 PM
–

1000% this I had to explain that the groups are totally different during a discussion on this site just a few days ago. I wouldn't exactly call myself an MRA but come on, any potential for rational discussion is killed when people associate this sub with the terpers.
/r/MensRights03/06/14 07:41 PM
3

This isn't constructive at all.
/r/MensRights03/06/14 02:45 AM
1

There will be no easy answers to this. Solving this problem seems to me no easier than accomplishing all the current goals of the MRM. Honestly I think if a person is constantly told by friends, TV, movies etc. over and over again that everything they do in their life is motivated by the desire to have sex, then they will start to believe it. If we want to truly tackle these problems, then we would have to destroy the idea of sex as a status symbol for men.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 08:13 PM
13

Sue the woman? Do you mean sue the accuser?
/r/MensRights20/05/14 03:19 AM
5

Why exactly would they want to restrict somebody from paying the entrance fee to run a charity race?
/r/MensRights18/05/14 06:38 PM
3

Pretty much this. She is not in jail because for that to happen, he would have to decide to press charges. If the roles were reversed though, I think /u/1dundundun has it spot on.
/r/MensRights18/05/14 03:55 AM
7

But that's a means to an end so it's different.
/r/MensRights14/05/14 02:15 AM
4

Are you suggesting that there are no open minded feminists anywhere?
/r/MensRights14/05/14 02:07 AM
11

Downvote me to hell. It's responses like these that make me question subscribing to this sub. "men are actually genuinely oppressed and women never were" "in fact feminism is allied with imperialist governments and helps undermine the left." Oh please.
/r/MensRights13/05/14 08:36 AM
1

They come up to you just for being with your niece? What do they say?
/r/MensRights08/05/14 01:07 AM
4

That red skull in a jug is freaking me out.
/r/MensRights03/05/14 05:10 PM
2

It's raining in ___
/r/seduction01/05/14 06:18 AM
9

Or is it one E, three times?
/r/MensRights28/04/14 12:42 AM
23

Also, "he couldn't perform."
/r/MensRights12/04/14 07:21 PM
1

Maybe she won it on merit; maybe she only won it because the school that awarded it wanted the publicity. I don't really know one way or the other, but if you have a way to link this to Men's Rights then I would be glad to see it.
/r/MensRights08/04/14 11:20 PM
8

Seriously, who cares what some ignorant HuffPo commenter thinks?
/r/MensRights07/04/14 09:45 PM
-1

Anarchistist
/r/MensRights16/03/14 06:13 PM
10

Some do, and some don't. I think there are plenty of articles posted in this sub that are just the way you describe, and some that talk about the perception of men in society without invoking the female boogeyman. I think you'd do well not to classify the entire MRM as one way or another, just as I (and I would hope you) don't classify all feminists as one way or another.
/r/MensRights16/03/14 04:28 PM
7

You sound like a rightist
/r/MensRights16/03/14 03:39 PM
-4

We are talking legal responsibility, right? He's the adult carrying the fucking gun.
/r/MensRights14/03/14 05:13 AM
0

The person accountable is the killer, unless, of course, you think a grown adult male is incapable of making decisions on his own?
/r/MensRights14/03/14 05:03 AM
-7

You're right, she should be taken out and shot !!!!!!! wait a second...
/r/MensRights14/03/14 01:14 AM
1

This isn't funny and is counterproductive to the purpose of this subreddit.
/r/MensRights28/01/14 11:03 PM
1

Ok, some things. I never said I'm entitled to anything so I'm not quite sure where you're getting that from. Next, you throw feminist around like it's a dirty word but I really don't see what your point is by calling me a feminist and talking about "you people." Further, if anyone is brigading here then I have not called upon them to do so. Lastly, you have decided to declare that I am not an MRA. So what I see here is a gender rights group that calls anyone that disagrees with them trolls, accu…
/r/MensRights28/01/14 10:20 PM
1

What in the world is chocoboat? I honestly have no idea what you're talking about. I have only but one vote to give.
/r/MensRights28/01/14 10:10 PM
1

So when you say this sub "allows" dissenting opinions, you mean it allows the comments to remain but people like you will call the dissenters "dumbass"? Is that right?
/r/MensRights28/01/14 03:18 AM
4

I mean, resorting to name calling just proves my point really. :\
/r/MensRights28/01/14 02:42 AM
2

Is it? Can you say with certainty that everything posted in this sub pertains to mens' rights? Have you never thought that someone was using anecdotal evidence in this sub to make grand claims without any sort of data?
/r/MensRights28/01/14 12:16 AM
7

I wouldn't exactly say this sub welcome dissenting opinions. Any question as to whether something has to do with Mens' Rights and it's downvoted.
/r/MensRights27/01/14 11:56 PM
12

Why is this the "real" rape culture rather than just another aspect of rape culture that affects both men and women?
/r/MensRights24/01/14 12:09 AM
8

Huh, it's odd that there's even a different word than rape for this.
/r/MensRights14/01/14 03:07 AM
1

What is forced envelopment?
/r/MensRights14/01/14 02:11 AM
2

Are men really "just as likely" to be the victims of rape as women are?
/r/MensRights14/01/14 01:50 AM
2

Are you complaining that a school offers an English class on feminist literature and then discusses feminism? What does this have to do with Men's Rights?
/r/MensRights07/01/14 08:09 AM
0

I believe the standard is "reasonable doubt"
/r/MensRights03/01/14 12:03 AM
0

Why do you think witness testimony is the only thing that matters? Many women don't see their attackers but that doesn't mean the rapists are uncatchable or unconvictable.
/r/MensRights02/01/14 08:14 PM
-1

I totally agree with you that feminist's and MRA's goals are not at odds. It's not a zero sum game and there is a fair amount of common ground. That being said: This isn't a false rape accusation. The woman was raped and this guy was wrongly convicted for the crime. That doesn't mean she made a false accusation about him. In the article the guy expresses a concern for finding the true rapist; not once does anyone say ever that she falsely accused him.
/r/MensRights02/01/14 05:25 PM
-1

Nobody connected to this story had said anything near resembling your comment that I replied too. The only person I see who has said those thing is you. I'm honestly curious where you guys see the men's rights issue here, and you'd do a much better job convincing me and others that you're right if you could tone down the insults and rhetoric.
/r/MensRights02/01/14 05:15 PM
-6

Despite all this insistence, none of you have provided any evidence that there is any sexism at play here. Certainly every bad thing that happens to a man isn't the result of his rights being compromised due to his sex?
/r/MensRights02/01/14 02:50 AM
-21

Your words, not mine.
/r/MensRights01/01/14 10:28 PM
-17

Apparently asking what this has to do with the sub detracts from the conversation from all the downvotes. Yes, a person was falsely imprisoned, but what does that have to do with being a man? Do you think a woman would be treated any better on release?
/r/MensRights01/01/14 10:07 PM
-44

What does this have to do with MensRights?
/r/MensRights01/01/14 08:59 PM
2

Just attempting makes you stand out
/r/seduction20/12/13 07:24 PM
3

Sorry to break it to you bro but I've been pretty successful being a good person.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/13 10:54 PM
0

You definitely don't want parenting advice from TRP dude.
/r/askTRP24/11/13 02:42 AM
-2

Oh, how telling the silence is.
/r/askTRP24/11/13 02:35 AM
21

"Confirm their fears" Dude, don't listen to this shit. You only look like a fucking creep when you tell a woman that you're a rapist. Let me repeat that. The highest voted comment at the moment is telling you to tell women that you're a rapist. Are you kidding me?
/r/askTRP24/11/13 01:29 AM
9

Um, Chris Christie is way too far to the left for him to be the nominee. They still blame him for going around New Jersey after Sandy with the president. How dare he do his job!? They claim it cost them the election.
/r/MensRights09/11/13 08:19 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter