TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Icerith Archive

View 0 posts and 109 comments by Icerith on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

You're welcome, I love listening to myself talk! :)
/r/MensRights29/05/20 03:25 PM
14

"Murder" is a crime in which you intend to take another life. It is generally premeditated and planned thoroughly, and there is usually an attempt to hide the body after death. "Manslaughter" is the crime of killing, but without intent. Usually it's by disregard of safety measures. For instance, if you drive your car, look down at your phone for a brief moment, and collide with a civilian and they die, that's likely manslaughter, not murder. Manslaughter charges are serious, but there are times …
/r/MensRights29/05/20 03:20 PM
1

Right, that's my point. It's not that it's a prevalent thing, just common enough for a stereotype exist. It doesn't make sense to take these cases and apply them so universally. Ooooohhh, absolutely then. Makes complete sense.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/05/20 03:42 PM
1

No, but I highly doubt I was born in an inescapable bubble. It's far more likely that it's just not common.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/05/20 03:39 PM
9

As if young guys don't stereotypically act immature too. Trying to puff their chests and fight anything that looks at them sideways. Uh... you must mean, like, teenagers. That, or you hang around some really immature people. I'm a young guy. My friends are all young guys. I see young guys on a regular basis. Nobody does that. I've, in fact, never even seen that happen. The only fight I've ever seen even occur was because a drunk 40-year old guy tried to take a swing at a drunk 36-year old female…
/r/PussyPassDenied12/05/20 06:00 AM
12

Dallas sallad?
/r/PussyPass11/05/20 08:25 PM
1

Keeping black people poor ensures they are easy to imprison, which provides cheap slave labor(literally, check your 13th amendment). But if this were literally true, they'd imprison anyone, not just blacks. And they do, but to say that the reason that black people are imprisoned more than white people is because of cheap slave labor is absurd. Also, it's not cheap to inhabit prisoners. The profit line of a prison is not very high, if it exists at all. It also makes it easier to pit race against …
/r/MensRights08/05/20 09:13 PM
2

Destruction of the welfare state, better economic education (and just better education in general), and higher actual policing of neighborhoods with low socioeconomic status. The destruction of the welfare state will force more black families to either a) stay at home with their family or b) prevent them from having children without consequence. Money that would be used for the welfare state can be used towards education and raising poor socioeconomic families out of poverty for long enough that…
/r/MensRights06/05/20 10:39 PM
1

That's difficult to swallow. There are black people at every level of government, so what, are they just complacent to the racism? I guess that's a possibility, but knowing how much money some people in government make, I'd have issue believing they're willing to be complacently racist to their race for $50,000/yr or even $80,000/yr. Also, what does the racism provide? Like, honestly?
/r/MensRights06/05/20 10:22 PM
2

I think suicide is a cutting topic irregardless of how it is done or how it is related to you. I was a bit harsh with how I explained it. It is much, much more likely in general that people who seem to actually be trying to kill themselves in America use guns. That's not to say other methods aren't successful, but they're just less successful less often, while guns have a pretty incredible effectiveness rate. There are people who use suicide as a form of attention seeking. Sometimes when they do…
/r/MensRights03/05/20 01:12 AM
8

Entirely fair. I should've said the most accessible and powerful option is generally the most likely. Anything less is much more of a simple cry for help. Considering the statistics most people refer to refer to America, my point still stands in that country.
/r/MensRights03/05/20 12:23 AM
-17

It's not difficult to commit suicide. It's far more likely that women don't attempt suicide more often than men, they cry for attention more often than men and suicide is their outlet of choice. That's not to say women don't commit suicide, of course they do. But, anyone who actually wants to commit suicide isn't going to go about it by hanging, or overdose, or slitting their wrists. Guns are quicker, easier, and are very likely to finish the job. Usually if you commit suicide by hanging, or som…
/r/MensRights02/05/20 09:49 PM
3

What? Some people sexualize animals, are they oppressing animals? Some people (wrongly) sexualize children, are they oppressing children? Most people sexualize their partners. Are all relationships just hierarchies of oppression? No. Because that's dumb.
/r/MensRights29/04/20 11:07 PM
3

While I generally agree with you, I don't think this is the same situation. The post that was attached was supposedly a double standard that negatively affects women (it doesn't, there's reasons, and it definitely is not oppression), and people responded with actual double standards that actually negatively affect men. We aren't dismissing women's oppression. There's no oppression to dismiss. If women care less about equal rights because of literal hypocrisy, then maybe the general human populat…
/r/MensRights29/04/20 03:46 PM
2

Video means everything. It's difficult to prove a self defense measure was "too brutal" in a situation if the person survives. I watched a dude break another guy's arm who was trying to fight him. They got it all on video, guy got off completely free. Video is the greatest evidence of all time.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/04/20 01:02 AM
2

I'm pretty ugly and got my check already. Checks out.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/04/20 07:02 AM
1

Insider Trading is generally investigated because of situations where it's likely. Senator Richard Burr and his wife sold off several million dollars in stock after a "top secret", closed doors senate meeting. That doesn't seem suspicious? Back when they sold their stock in late January, beginning of February, the government was still actively downplaying the damage that the virus would cause. The amount of confirmed cases worldwide wasn't even 10% of what they are now. There weren't more sales …
/r/PussyPass16/04/20 11:17 PM
1

Making an educated guess is not Insider Trading. Selling based off of information that the average consumer/share holder cannot obtain is Insider Trading. Irregardless of what you believe, this is what those senators did.
/r/PussyPass16/04/20 10:27 PM
-1

Many economists thought the economy was going to take a hit because of the situation in China, but back in January none of them even theorized about what would happen if the virus took over America because we were assured that we'd be safe. Then politics got in the way, and here we are. Nobody thought in January that this could become a global pandemic. It was a pandemic in China, but we were under the impression it was fairly localized. Irregardless if you're an imbecile or not, these senators …
/r/PussyPass16/04/20 10:20 PM
-5

I knew due to a new CEO and the direction he would go that the company I had invested in was going to do worse. They were shifting focus from customers to investors. Which would lead to an uptick but at the end of it less customers would mean less value. So I sold what I had. Do I deserve to be in prison for knowing it would lose value? You did not know, though. You made an educated assumption and it likely worked out on your favor. Nobody knew the Coronavirus was going to crash the economy beca…
/r/PussyPass16/04/20 08:15 PM
0

The post doesn't describe it well, but it was insider trading. She had prior information that the company was going to do worse and sold her stocks before the public ever knew. Because of this, she got the best selling price while the public had to sell their shares at a lower cost. It's called insider trading, and it's definitely illegal. She should have done time for it.
/r/PussyPass16/04/20 07:51 PM
2

Hope that made you realise how stupid that sentence was, and just on the off chance that you have zero kinds of milk in your fridge, try to imagine the very possible scenario that you did So we're going to ignore the scenario where I don't actually have milk in my fridge (because I don't, I'm lactose intolerant), and why? Because it's harmful to your logic. I don't have milk in my fridge. Your baseless claim was false. Your allegory is not comparable at all anyway. You saying I have milk in my f…
/r/MensRights12/04/20 05:26 PM
-1

You don't "do" and unproven allegation. Sure you do. Allegations are made, that's how they exist. Generally after you're raped, you accuse someone and then evidence is gathered and sorted. That's not how it works at all. When you say that a crime has been committed against you, detectives will take down a flurry of likely suspects, collect evidence from the crime scene and you, and interview suspects for alibis. I'm not sure I've ever heard someone argue that the victim has to go gather all nece…
/r/MensRights12/04/20 05:16 PM
2

it's ironic, you think accusing someone of rape without evidence is a horrible, but you're totally fine with OP accusing people of a crime without evience. Except that's not what's happening. When someone accuses someone of a crime, they better have some amount of evidence. If they don't have enough, the evidence is insufficient. If they don't have any, it is baseless. Baseless accusations are just as bad as false accusations, because baseless accusations are false acussations. That's all these …
/r/MensRights12/04/20 04:56 PM
3

an apple thrown at your head and a pear thrown at your head would cause the same level of threat, doesn't mean I should use the incorrect term when describing the event. But if you messed up and said "I had a pear thrown at my head" when it was really an apple and someone retorted "uh, actually, it was an apple", I'd tell them to shut up all the same. It doesn't actually matter. have you called out any men on this sub when they make an unproven allegation? I don't generally find a need to. Rando…
/r/MensRights12/04/20 04:26 PM
5

That's not what innocent until proven guilty means, false accusation is a separate crime This isn't a court of law. With insufficient evidence, none of these accusations, false or unproven, would hold up in a court of law. That's not a discussion that has to be had. What we're talking about is how these things work logically. From any sort of logical perspective, false and unproven allegations are the same level of threat. They see both harmful to the individual being targeted in the same way. I…
/r/MensRights12/04/20 04:06 PM
36

No. Everything unproven by the original standards should automatically be considered false. Anything otherwise is called "faith" and "belief", and they have no place in an argument. The burden of proof is on the person who made the allegation, not the person who wants the baseless allegation to be proven. They are entirely within their right to say that it is false if it is unproven and baseless, because without proof that the original allegation is true, it may as well be false. The only differ…
/r/MensRights12/04/20 03:45 PM
2

Nobody who gets what he wants, actually says what he wants. Sure they do. That's a dumb point, and easily proven wrong. You think every US president became president by saying they didn't want the presidency? Of course they don't believe in anything they proclaim. They get what they want without saying what they want. Every successful group does that. Again, every successful group doesn't do that. They don't believe anything they proclaim because they're liars. It's as plain and simple as that. …
/r/MensRights11/04/20 02:57 PM
22

I mean, ignoring the fact that morals and laws don't just disappear when men do, I'm still fairly certain you could do that now, to many men's chagrin. I know that's not the audience you're looking for, but still.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/04/20 03:56 AM
4

We messaged for about two hours back and forth and they refused to actually read my replies. They responded to my entire page replies with dumb, one sentence retorts that meant nothing in a matter of literal minutes. They argue based on definitions which aren't true. They asked me to "name" bad Feminists (which would've been an easy task, but not the point), yet when I asked why they were a feminist and not an egalatarian, they replied with "large sects of egalatarians believe that the status qu…
/r/MensRights03/04/20 01:45 AM
14

This "zeitgeist" is not patriarchy, though. That's the society that men and women have created and continue to uphold through their actions. By using the term patriarchy, you're unfairly pinpointing men in power as the source of the issues, when it isn't. This zeitgeist that dictates different roles for different genders in society is primarily built upon the notion that men are producers for the family outside the home, and that women are caretakers of domestic matters in the home. Yes, and wom…
/r/MensRights02/04/20 06:43 PM
11

There was a psychologist who studied a school playground and noticed that boys who fought (even physically fighting) eventually became friends, while girls who fought basically never became friends. If I can find it later, I'll come back with the source.
/r/PussyPass30/03/20 07:57 PM
1

Even if I was just arguing semantics, I'm not proving his point. If I'm arguing semantics, it's because they need to be argued. I don't believe I am, though. They seem to think that they need to defend a population from a "crisis" that they themselves made and chose to exist in. They're literally doing the definition of white knighting. If they don't see that, their problem I guess, lol.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/03/20 03:21 PM
0

Apparently I'm a white knight for talking from my experience and trying to provide insight into what it's like on the other side of this equation - which you have NEVER been on, and talk with utmost confidence on. Grass isn't always greener, and experience doesn't always equal knowledge. I've met masters and PhD students in my school who I thought were complete morons based on their ideas. You're nothing special. This is what I meant by pure unadulterated autism. Now try to comprehend that there…
/r/PussyPassDenied28/03/20 03:19 PM
4

You're proving my point. You don't have a point. You're defending people on the internet that don't need defending. You're white knighting. They can get it for free, but they would rather berate people who are trying to pay their bills and waste their time, when they could go get the same thing for free. And fuck those people. Who cares? Also, everybody is "trying to pay their bills," that doesn't make these women martyrs. They're regular humans, just like the rest of us. We all eat the big shit…
/r/PussyPassDenied28/03/20 07:15 AM
11

The problem is that they can get it for free. Her body costs nothing because the market is oversaturated with people just like her who are willing to sell it, at least partially, for free, generally. There's so much free internet porn, it neutralizes any chick trying to sell her body specifically on the internet. At this point, the only women who really get away with it are those who fit niche wants, like incredibly pale, or cosplay, or short tomboys, etc. Plus, for every one of those "thirsty d…
/r/PussyPassDenied28/03/20 06:45 AM
8

Lol, people are using simp so often it's starting to lose it's edge. Cuck was a real insult, until internet popularity got a hold of it. Fuck, we ruin everything. I don't understand what "shitty behavior" women in porn are subjected to. They have sex on camera for money. Their skills are negligible, and their bodies are usually 50% fake by the time they're older than 25. 90-99% of pornstars don't interact with their fans on any meaningful level. If you think some people in a reddit thread, or ev…
/r/PussyPassDenied28/03/20 05:35 AM
1

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fetus V https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Embryo V https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zygote V https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cell_(biology) You are an idiot if you can't put those together, and the fact that I had to explain it to you is even worse, honestly. Please don't breed, don't pass on your genes.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/03/20 03:13 PM
1

One celled organism are alive by all definitions, fetuses are not. A fetus is, considerably, FAR more alive than a single celled organism is! What the actual FUCK are you on?!
/r/PussyPassDenied26/03/20 02:48 PM
1

but if it's best for the fetus falls away because of it not being alive scientifically speaking Oh, I didn't know single cell organisms weren't alive, by scientific definition. Guess we're going to have to rewrite the books. Guess what? Things don't just become living things. If it grows to be a living thing, it was likely a living thing the entire time. Even the sperm cells that went into the egg are living, did you know that? therefore the family's opinion remains Something, something, "my bod…
/r/PussyPassDenied26/03/20 01:31 PM
1

Exactly.
/r/MensRights25/03/20 09:26 PM
7

https://www.unaids.org/en/topic/prevention "Several methods and interventions have proved highly effective in reducing the risk of, and protecting against, HIV infection, including male and female condoms, the use of antiretroviral medicines as pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), voluntary male medical circumcision (VMMC), behaviour change interventions to reduce the number of sexual partners, the use of clean needles and syringes, opiate substitution therapy (e.g. methadone) and the treatment of p…
/r/MensRights25/03/20 04:01 PM
4

I'm fairly into the MRM movement and I'm hardcore anti-abortion. But, there's lots of "pro-choice" people on the subreddit, too. I think it's a minor issue compared to some others. But, it's strongly related to MR, so I have an opinion.
/r/MensRights24/03/20 10:51 PM
4

Whenever I argue abortion, I always make the case that under the guise of rape, incest, health problems (for the fetus or the mother), and under age participants, abortion is a necessary evil. I don't agree with it, just like I don't agree with putting someone out of their misery or shooting someone in self defense, I just know it's the better alternative (generally). My argument against abortion is an argument for father's rights and against the lack of humanity and responsibility that some wom…
/r/MensRights24/03/20 10:49 PM
3

Walking down the street is enough to cause violence. No, it doesn't cause violence. You're being daft. At any point in time you can be a victim of violence, but walking down the street did not cause it. The person who is being violent caused it. I've not minced my words so stop trying to extrapolate something out of it that there isn't. I've only repeated what you've said, dude. If you don't think that someone taunting is enough to wind someone up and for them to resort to violence then I don't …
/r/MensRights23/03/20 06:10 PM
5

You think taunting is enough to cause violence? This is her fault. Taunting is expected in competition, the correct response is not abusing the taunter. I don't think he did anything that justified a violent reaction, and he definitely didn't do anything to lose my sympathy.
/r/MensRights23/03/20 05:02 PM
11

Usually, it's bad to think that people are deserving of pain for their actions. Especially when their actions are simple taunting... in a competitive game show... I'm sure there are many a situation where you can justify someone getting hurt for something they did, or you can say "Well, it wasn't the right thing to do, but he did deserve it," but this isn't one of those situations. She's vicious. Plain and simple.
/r/MensRights23/03/20 04:11 PM
2

I love bodyweight exercises! I don't have any sort of routine set up, but random push ups, pull ups (I've got a bar on my door), and other little exercises alongside stretching keep me really spry and helps to waste a lot of pent up energy. I'll get a routine for it eventually. If you stick to it, you can get an incredibly toned look very easily (if you're a short skinny dude, might be more difficult for bigger guys). Plus, they require basically no equipment most of the time, and the other time…
/r/MensRights22/03/20 04:12 PM
3

The end goal is the part I appreciated the most. That satisfaction at the end of it all was better than sex. I felt great and thought I looked great, too. I didn't really care what other people thought of it. But, like I said, it wasn't maintainable for me. Couldn't afford to waste money on the gym anymore and quickly lost it. Now I'm just simply too busy, with school and work. I'm sure I'll get back into it in my later 20s when life slows down a bit.
/r/MensRights22/03/20 04:05 PM
3

There's different levels of maintainable, obviously. And I'm not saying that it's not maintainable, I'm just saying it's not for every person. I think that's just blatantly false. I can do reddit in between doing things, or even while doing some other things. I can't do that with working out.
/r/MensRights22/03/20 04:02 PM
1

Hear, hear.
/r/MensRights22/03/20 08:05 AM
33

I like this "attainable" v.s. "maintainable" mentality. I don't know why you're being downvoted. I went to the gym for four months and saw massive gains. I was "ripped" and I didn't think that would happen, but I'm short and super skinny, so I guess it wasn't too out of the ball park. I quit going for two and half months, mostly for financial reasons, and lost a huge portion of it all. Muscles are incredibly fleeting, in the long term of things. I wouldn't have been able to maintain that level o…
/r/MensRights22/03/20 07:57 AM
9

What? These are bitches that thought they could do something and didn't actually get away with it. The whole sub is about that. The sub's entire intention was that. How did the sub become "women bad?" EDIT: OP's comment originally said something about how this subreddit has turned "woman hating" very quickly. They changed it because the internet points. They're almost scum.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/03/20 04:57 PM
27

Dude, alright. Just because someone wishes for her death does not mean they have suddenly become some advocate for a vigilante justice system. I'm sure it's just about the fact that it would be poetic justice against her. Regardless, most people do not rationally wish death on others, even if they say they do. If you looked me in the eyes and said that prison is where morals thrive, I'd laugh right back in your face. Laws still need to be abided by, sure, but of there'd be anybody to break both …
/r/PussyPassDenied09/03/20 08:53 AM
1

That a great macro-level argument, but the micro counter examples are false equivalents. I don't believe they are. Like I said, just because 50% of the population suffers from it doesn't make it more unequal. I think they are incredibly comparable. Arguing that one inequality is more important because it affects more people is just silly. But this policy doesn't affect us (men) in a negative way Yes it does. Removing thousands, possibly millions of dollars from tax revenue harms everybody. Also,…
/r/MensRights26/02/20 09:39 PM
1

You seem to be arguing this from two different perspectives, then flop flopping when it's convenient. That, or I'm gravely misunderstanding you. You're also explaining this to me as if I don't know how periods work. I am a male, but I'm not a moron. I'm entirely aware of the concept. I hold my opinions despite my knowledge. Now imagine the government does you a favor. You don't pay taxes on diapers. This quote shows that you understand how the government works. The government takes a tax from th…
/r/MensRights26/02/20 08:58 PM
1

The government takes their cut for toilet paper, soap, shampoo, body wash, etc., and 100% of the population needs those. I don't see your argument.
/r/MensRights26/02/20 08:19 PM
1

I have fairly bad dandruff. I have to buy sulfate free shampoos to keep it in check, my insurance doesn't pay for a dime of it. The rest of the world expects me to keep it in check, because having my scalp flakes fly around and dirty things is gross. On a less personal note, most people have to pay for soap and shampoo. Society expects them to use it, but insurance doesn't pay for shampoo or soap. Toilet paper, body wash, toothpaste, etc. The point is that requiring a thing to survive and requir…
/r/MensRights26/02/20 07:45 PM
0

Maybe you don't know, but the average age of losing virginity in the USA and most other modern countries is 16. That doesn't matter. I consider the average person (especially in the USA) to be incredibly unintelligent when it comes to sexual behavior. Also, the average age of losing your virginity, or having sex, is 16, an age where you're much more likely to make mistakes and ignore consequences of actions for simple pleasure? Color me shocked. it also means that a lot of people start to have s…
/r/MensRights19/02/20 05:30 AM
1

Having sex with 16 years old doesn't make you pedophile Not definitively, but the law isn't strict on the psychological definitions of things. It would still absolutely be statutory rape if you were 19 or older. or predator. I highly disagree. Anyone who is 16 (or younger) should not be having sex with anyone who is more than two years older than them, at least. I don't even really think 18-19 year olds should be having sex, but they're legally adults. Even then, the maturity difference between …
/r/MensRights19/02/20 04:02 AM
2

How many female teachers were sent to prison for breaking this law? There are probably less female teachers who were actually sent to prison for breaking the law than there were men sent to prison for not even committing as close to a serious act. That's not even including the societal benefit women get even when they're pedophiles and predators. More than enough. The only amount of "enough" is when every female teacher who ever breaks this law is sent to prison and pays for their crimes. Some m…
/r/MensRights19/02/20 03:31 AM
22

I don't necessarily disagree or agree, but a dude's entire life can be ruined by breaking this societal standard. A woman's basically never is even damaged. We should, at the very least, have the same standards for each gender.
/r/MensRights18/02/20 06:16 PM
4

"I think you're in the wrong class, this is a womens class" You should've gotten her fuckin' fired, that's 100% discrimination and illegal under literally every definition of the law. I know that colleges are havens for these kind of ideologies, but that's when you have to go above the colleges. Go to the accreditation places, go to your state. They're more likely to do something, and a college will be more likely to follow a more ethical path if their accreditation is threatened.
/r/MensRights14/02/20 05:23 PM
2

straightblooded male As a bisexual guy, I love the term "straightblooded," I've never heard it before. I found it super funny for some reason!
/r/MensRights14/02/20 05:21 PM
1

Fighting and physical violence over respect and pride. Unnecessary competition and the never-ending quest to MOG or be MOGed. Taking pride in sleeping with another mans girl. Except women can do all three of these things as well. The issue with calling it "toxic masculinity" is that you're making it unnecessarily gendered. Women and men can both be toxic, nobody is arguing those facts. Then you have all these little microaggressions like when you brag about how little cars always get out of the …
/r/MensRights14/02/20 05:03 PM
7

Even if it's not real, let's not pretend like it is. Doxing is not okay.
/r/MensRights07/02/20 06:44 AM
2

I wasn't suggesting ME to run the world. Just progressive people with inclusive values. Ignoring the fact that you must be someone with progressive values (i.e., people like you running the world), it also is just simply untrue. Not that I have to prove you wrong. You're not stating anything other than opinions. And it's fact that people are being mistreated more often since both metoo and the rise/riling of the neonazi. I'd love to see where you get these "facts." And even if it was fact, it do…
/r/MensRights05/02/20 11:22 PM
3

And if you can't understand how different a world run by compassionate progressives (typically women) could be, I don't know why I'm even in here. Have you ever seen the difference in cleanliness between our public restrooms? Have a look. Really observe your fellow man sometime and think about what you're actually talking about because I don't think you are at all. This is incredibly sexist, and you're not the type of person I would ever want running the world. Comparing the state of public rest…
/r/MensRights05/02/20 10:38 PM
3

I personally know people that have been illegally denied housing recently just because of their gender or race, yes absolutely. Ignoring the fact that your story is entirely anecdotal, you've never personally faced it, so therefore you can't be 100% certain that those people were denied specifically because of their race or gender, do you? If you have proof, go to the BBB, or whatever government organization oversees business in your state/town. It's illegal. The systemic ability of those people…
/r/MensRights05/02/20 09:44 PM
3

Exactly. Principles, morals, and ethics are what matter, the names do not. Don't trust people who so blindly follow an ideology and believe it can do no wrong. There's a quote about how individuals are geniuses, but groups of people are moronic. Follow that.
/r/MensRights05/02/20 05:31 PM
2

I agree, I don't call myself a feminist and never will. I say that I'm egalitarian, or just say that I'm up for equal rights in all directions. There's little to no reason, other than social gain, to be a part of "groups."
/r/MensRights05/02/20 05:27 PM
3

I like to think you take the responsibility for the groups you decide to align with. If a certain group does something that you don't necessarily agree with, you shouldn't align yourself with that group. This line of reasoning helps me to disable group think and align myself with ideals, not people. I don't have to be a feminist or an MRA to believe that all people should be equal. And neither does anyone else.
/r/MensRights05/02/20 05:21 PM
7

Your gender, especially if it's cis male, is not equivalent to race, neither historically nor philosophically Right, because some unchanging factor about your physical appearance and life isn't equivalent to... an unchanging factor about your physical appearance and life. I agree that gender and race aren't the same thing, but they are definitely comparable. Their histories aren't a factor (because the history of a race is not the history of a person, similar for gender), and it doesn't matter w…
/r/MensRights05/02/20 05:13 PM
29

Underrated and hilarious.
/r/MensRights31/01/20 05:12 PM
1

Not at all, actually! I love North Dakota, I've been to Los Angeles once and I don't plan on ever going back. Metropolitan life is not for me.
/r/MensRights25/01/20 10:01 PM
1

Hello also from North Dakota! :D
/r/MensRights25/01/20 09:33 PM
4

I disagree. I think men and women have mostly separated based on role fairly naturally, and whatever came afterwards was just people normalizing those natural roles. Women birth the children and create breast milk. It makes sense for them to be the caregivers. If men have to work to feed three, they're going to have to work more and take up the "bread winner" position. You can't just leave those roles unfilled. Women have a predisposition to stay around their children, especially when they're yo…
/r/MensRights25/01/20 12:10 AM
3

You can separate women's and men's roles in society, that's fine, but to ever assume that a man can't do a woman's job, or vice versa, is moronic. Women and men are different, but we aren't completely different creatures.
/r/MensRights24/01/20 08:49 PM
18

That is some straight up hentai shit right there.
/r/MensRights24/01/20 02:33 PM
3

Are this point, I stay subscribed to TRP because some of the long rants are absolutely hilarious. Correct? Meh, maybe to some extent, but nothing to write home about. But, absolutely hilarious.
/r/MensRights17/01/20 06:33 PM
5

I've come to the opinion that love isn't actually romantic at all. "Love" is about safety and social status. Or, at least that's what most people seem to date for nowadays. Modern romance is dead.
/r/MensRights17/01/20 06:26 PM
-2

Unless you consensually choose to have a baby. Then you owe it all the use of your body. If you didn't want that, don't have the child. You get over it. #mywalletmychoice
/r/MensRights17/01/20 04:13 AM
11

I mean, you sort of debunked your first paragraph with your second paragraph. Change costs money and time. If you're simply transferring from one shit idea to another shit idea, solely because of "change", then you're a fool.
/r/TheRedPill14/01/20 10:12 PM
2

Gotcha, I completely understand now.
/r/MensRights08/01/20 02:48 PM
2

I'm super confused at your disclaimer. Why "freedom" in quotes? Genuinely curious.
/r/MensRights08/01/20 02:36 PM
5

Not that I disagree, but... There's multiple studies involving toddlers and children that deal with empathy. Feel free to look into it and challenge your bias. Toddler and children brains can be argued that some amount of society has rubbed off on them. The parenting can be considered societal, in some cases. I'd like to see the studies, though. It's not up to me to find them, I suggest you show them to me if you want me to believe you. Nobody likes a preacher. This is literally you moving the g…
/r/MensRights03/01/20 10:17 PM
1

You don't say?
/r/MensRights31/12/19 02:43 PM
1

Oh, that's what you're still arguing? That's not an argument. Your belief in the face of facts means nothing. They clearly exist. There's your proof. There is no boogeyman.
/r/MensRights27/12/19 09:55 PM
2

I can't, I'm super bored and have a problem.
/r/MensRights27/12/19 06:14 PM
0

I never said you were wrong. Point to where I said you were wrong. I've clarified literally everything I've said multiple times. Yes, you're garbage at arguing.
/r/MensRights27/12/19 05:27 PM
0

Okay. This is my last comment. Beforehand, I just have to state how dumb this conversation has been. I literally think I've lost brain cells. I've repeated the same thing over and over and you still haven't got it. My point is that the individual has accountability and there is no blaming the world for your decision to get thrown into jail or your lack of good decision-making. I, and tons of other people in the thread, the vast majority of other people in the thread, completely agree. That is mo…
/r/MensRights27/12/19 01:04 PM
0

I think I've been quite clear in basically all of my comments. If you can't read at a 9th grade comprehension level, maybe arguing on reddit isn't your strong suit.
/r/MensRights27/12/19 12:53 PM
0

Ahhhhhh, right. The shill/troll. If you believe it is a boogeyman, you're not welcome here. You're not someone who can accept logic. Also, r/WitchesVsPatriarchy, r/TwoXChromosomes, and the entire UK political system right now would like to prove you wrong.
/r/MensRights27/12/19 05:22 AM
1

Pretty much everyone in the thread agrees with you. Basically nobody disagrees. The thread is an example of the incredible hypocrisy that the "feminist" types produce in order to show proof of a system that is against them. Jesus, dude, I've literally said nothing different for the past three comments. I've repeated this same thing over and over. Learn to read.
/r/MensRights27/12/19 04:44 AM
1

No, it's a bunch of guys pointing out the hypocrisy of women who try to claim that the system is against them. I would assume a very small minority of men in this entire thread believe the system is set up against them. I feel like you're not actually reading and understanding any of the comments. You're simply attempting to state a point that isn't true, and you've been tested and don't have an out.
/r/MensRights27/12/19 04:13 AM
1

I don't have to dominate anything, I'm perfectly content. I think you're misunderstanding the point. When men get less degrees than women, it's individuals going after their personally set goals. But, when women don't take high paying careers, similar to the above, they're oppressed under a patriarchal society. That's what the other guy said was hypocritical. I agree with you that people who personally set their own goals and achieve them is how society basically works, and anyone who decries "t…
/r/MensRights26/12/19 11:46 PM
2

Right, but when some people don't dominate the top echelons of society, and they cry feminism and patriarchy as the reason, that's not the same thing? He did say he was just pointing out hypocrisy.
/r/MensRights26/12/19 09:25 PM
7

Well, correlation does link the two. It just doesn't prove that one causes the other. They are, at least, related. They could both be propelled by a single variable, like low intelligence. It's also not just single motherhood, it's single parenthood. Statistics seem to show that those without a two parent household are incredibly more likely to be criminals. It also shows that most criminals come from single parent households. That's not statistics you just ignore because you can't find a causal…
/r/MensRights24/12/19 09:58 PM
5

Sometimes that's the best info you got. With a correlation that high (i.e. 5x, 9x), are you suggesting they aren't at least tangentially related? It's pretty obvious that the lack of a parent in a household is pretty devastating to a child's development. You don't need a study proving causation to see that.
/r/MensRights24/12/19 09:54 PM
1

I don't agree either. I never stated that.
/r/MensRights24/12/19 09:51 PM
12

We are assuming racism. When you take racism out of the situation, of course it's still bad. We aren't talking about "why it's still bad", though. We're talking about why it's racist. All things that are racist are still bad even when you remove race as a relevant factor. Hate crimes, banks denying loans, unequal hiring or housing opportunity... there is not a non-bad racist thing under the sun. It's a moot point. Systemic power of racism makes no sense, as the idea is as simple as it can be. Do…
/r/MensRights24/12/19 06:20 PM
13

Why isn't it fine, though? Maybe because it's racist? Piss off.
/r/MensRights24/12/19 06:07 PM
3

No, when scholars make a claim with zero evidence, we don't take them seriously. Has nothing to so with the amount of scholars making the claim. Anyone who believes that is a moron and is going to be easily indoctrinated when businesses pay for scholars to "agree mostly" on a subject.
/r/MensRights24/12/19 06:06 PM
12

Different, but they are both completely racist. You're just arbitrarily deciding one is worse to fit an agenda. They're both morally abhorrent. I'll agree that one is hurt feelings and one is hurt livelihoods, but that doesn't necessarily make one worse than the other. Plus, banks are not government owned. By that description, the government is often less racist towards minorities because the hardcore push for affirmative action in the past 15 years. If anything, white people and asian people ar…
/r/MensRights24/12/19 06:03 PM
2

I would also like some examples?
/r/MensRights21/12/19 11:31 PM
11

It's understandable that you're worried that your belief is going to harm your grade. It shouldn't be something you worry about, but in this day and age, it's understandable. Fortunately, out of all of my professors so far, I've only had one that attempted to reduce my grade because of political belief, and I almost got her fired for it. As much as the college and university system sucks, they do not take stuff like that lightly. College is where you're meant to speak your mind. It's literally w…
/r/MensRights21/12/19 04:10 PM
3

And I'll concede that of all forms of self defense, Jiu Jitsu is definitely one that I know is effective. However, again, that doesn't mean you're going to ruin every 6'5" guy that comes your way, and you taking one guy down who is meant to train you and not kill you, especially at 15, is not necessarily a fool proof solution. I mean, nothing is, but a gun is probably going to be much more reliable, especially when you know how to use it. But, I'm glad you enjoy Jiu Jitsu! I hear it's incredibly…
/r/MensRights12/12/19 11:27 PM
9

It also is almost wholly unnecessary. While I will never critique someone for wanting to be physically healthy or for wanting to be more confident with their body image, to assume that getting stronger is the societally correct thing to do, either to prove yourself as a good mate or to protect yourself and others, is just wholeheartedly false. Your ability to physically protect yourself is almost entirely based on your height. I'm 5'7". There are 6' tall women who could put me down in a heartbea…
/r/MensRights12/12/19 08:38 PM
4

If that's what you truly believe, then you'll never win a debate/argument. You might as well never share your opinion. You aren't speaking facts if you can't back them up. You are correct that the average woman in STEM would probably produce just as much inventions/ideas as the average man in STEM. Or any other field, for that matter. However, men dominate most STEM fields, and have for a long time. Therefore, they have made the most inventions historically. They also make the most inventions to…
/r/MensRights06/12/19 03:36 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter