TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

IcyTy Archive

View 8 posts and 524 comments by IcyTy on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Gravity will let her know. I make girly jumps like this where I kick my ass all the time. It's fun. But you need height. The distance between her knees and the ground and the length of her shin/tibia (lower leg) must lead to an unavoidable reality in the undepicted 3rd panel. Which is quite realistic since by the time a woman this fat managed to get her feet past her knees after a leap, she probably already reached the apex of her jump and is descending
/r/MensRights01/03/17 01:09 PM
1

If he did cover, they might have left that out in the article. As for revealing a detail, could be done by accident or induced through trickery
/r/MensRights24/11/16 06:32 PM
7

Imagine the shitstorm if a mother was out at the zoo with her daughter and a guy approaches her, picks her up, and starts giving advice.
/r/MensRights06/11/16 11:47 PM
0

he went to police and described how he was pressured. Where are you getting that? Is there a different news article in the original thread? All I'm seeing in this Sep29 article: The teen told police he met the women through a mutual friend. The teen told detectives Weaver looked at him and asked, "What? You've never had a threesome before?" Where does it say the teen went to police? Where does it say the teen described himself as feeling pressured?
/r/MensRights06/11/16 11:46 PM
1

To judge that I would want to hear the account of events from the alleged rape victim, like if they consider it rape or not.
/r/MensRights03/11/16 09:39 PM
1

I find it interesting how she goes from "Apparently I said yes" to "I said yes" between the issue of dancing to the issues of dorm accompaniment / fingering. Her appeal to "most guys ask" is interesting too, as you say. I think the AVFM's article by August covered this contradiction http://www.avoiceformen.com/mens-rights/false-rape-culture/a-scrape-on-campus-holes-in-the-stanford-rape-conviction/
/r/MensRights09/10/16 04:03 AM
1

I was simply rejecting the informal use, I prefer the formal. The whole reason we do discuss this stuff is clearly culturally (if not legally) it is deemed acceptable for pubescent male / post-pubescent female relationships (thus the light sentences, high-fiving, South Park humor) but unacceptable for pubescent female / post-pubescent male ones.
/r/MensRights09/10/16 04:02 AM
1

Is there any point to saying no when you'll obviously just insist otherwise, as you already felt it okay to assert that based on my opinion?
/r/MensRights09/10/16 03:59 AM
1

I'm attempting to find an article that does explicitly mention what you're talking about, I would be interested in reading it if I did find it. Exact quotes would be ideal as people often misrepresent witnesses in summaries.
/r/MensRights28/09/16 04:40 AM
1

The "isn't so bad" proponent is the father, I'm saying both summaries sound extreme and a middle ground explanation is more plausible. The father was minimizing by using phrases like 'sex mad' and 'fully up' and 'totally unaffected'. You can't even accept a moderate position here, LOL
/r/MensRights28/09/16 04:39 AM
1

I started puberty by 11 so it wouldn't have been pedophilia if a female teacher fucked me.
/r/MensRights28/09/16 04:37 AM
1

Are you implying I'm homosexually attracted to the boy because I entertain the idea that he was up for fucking a female teacher? Makes no sense.
/r/MensRights28/09/16 04:36 AM
2

Consent is affirmation, prefix with 'informed' or 'uncoerced' or similar if you want to be picky about details.
/r/MensRights18/09/16 12:47 AM
2

title is not incorrect, "consensual" isn't in the title it just says 'having sex'. Plus I disagree, you can consent to sex with people in positions of authority over you. It's just probably that coercion can come into play and best avoided.
/r/MensRights18/09/16 12:45 AM
3

On the other hand, if a mother said this she might get away with it
/r/MensRights18/09/16 12:44 AM
-11

I only call it rape when there's a lack of consent, not when consent is deemed inadmissible.
/r/MensRights18/09/16 12:44 AM
-21

To be super-specific here, we have actually still not heard the boy's voice. We have heard: 1) from the father: "He is sex mad. He would have been fully up for this experience and in many ways sees it as a notch on his belt and is totally unaffected by it" 2) from the NSPCC spokesman: The victim’s voice appears to have been ignored as despite his own father claiming that his son was ‘fully up for the experience’ the boy himself said he had not enjoyed it and knew it was wrong. Who's to say eithe…
/r/MensRights18/09/16 12:43 AM
0

I'd be okay with this if it was working both ways, but I don't think "his immaturity narrowed the age gap" has ever flown with a 21 year old male and an 11 year old female, at least not in the last century.
/r/MensRights18/09/16 12:38 AM
1

Did she get knocked out by him? Obviously he gave her 16 suplexes.
/r/MensRights18/09/16 12:09 AM
2

Actually, in all fairness, women might go behind dumpsters, drunk and willingly, to do drugs and get even more intoxicated, rather than have sex.
/r/MensRights18/09/16 12:07 AM
2

Good point. Who's to say they even spoke English to him?
/r/MensRights18/09/16 12:06 AM
1

Nice, boots on the ground, didn't expect.
/r/MensRights02/09/16 06:49 AM
1

To know how 'justice' this is, I'd need to know what sex acts she was doing. If it was something like sodomizing him with a plunger I could see this being less unreasonable but if it's just something un-intrusive like a blowjob then anything past a decade seems excessive. Fuck, realistically, 10 month misdemeanour, if we look at actual harm caused instead of butthurt outrage people get. Keep in mind here that first degree murder is 30 years in Jersey. Is that really only 5 years worse than whate…
/r/MensRights02/09/16 06:38 AM
10

Implying that lesbian bars even have male washrooms.
/r/MensRights02/09/16 06:29 AM
8

“I said, ‘They didn’t let me in because I was a woman.’ They [the police officers] just laughed at me.” I had almost given up on police. GMH She continues: “I think the LGBT scene is just for gay men I think that stopped somewhere around the time that GLBT became LGBT
/r/MensRights02/09/16 06:25 AM
2

Unfortunately they could probably press assault charges saying that since it was ambiguous, they had not given permission for the slap... but of course, if you just walk up and say "I'd like my free slap now" and they hit you, if you wanted to press charges, cops would ignore it.
/r/MensRights02/09/16 06:22 AM
1

I wouldn't say 'cops' plural, no need to generalize when this incident only involves a single police officer. A "C. Chang" based on his lapel, as you can see in this screenshot from the "Expose Toronto" video here: http://imgur.com/a/4JOFB I can see another officer in the background but he doesn't necessarily know how Mr. Chang is treating the videographer. According to http://beforeitsnews.com/alternative/2016/08/toronto-police-threaten-to-arrest-me-and-steal-camera-for-filming-nudist-event-in-…
/r/MensRights26/08/16 06:05 AM
2

We need to get #BlackLivesMatterToronto on this pronto.
/r/MensRights26/08/16 02:56 AM
1

I thought it was legal to photograph people in plain view in public areas.
/r/MensRights26/08/16 02:53 AM
1

If products tailored to women like clothing or shoes are too expensive they can just buy products tailor to men. They are only being "taxed" due to gender-conformist attitudes about it. Men tend to be biologically predisposed to being larger so really, quality being equal, our clothing would cost more due to having to cover a larger area. We also tend to lead rougher lives so our clothing would have to be replaced more often. If women want to drape themselves in delicate expensive silks that's t…
/r/MensRights26/08/16 02:53 AM
2

Unfortunately it was a MALE rape victim so the voice must be unheard. Might have had a chance if it was a female rape victim complaining about being raped by 3 lesbians.
/r/MensRights26/08/16 02:50 AM
1

I would vote Lauren Southern as United States President or Canadian Prime Minister.
/r/MensRights26/08/16 02:47 AM
1

MFW excited about Canadian politics again due to Lauren and then no Libertarian running in my area.
/r/MensRights26/08/16 02:47 AM
1

I love how I can recognize Lauren Southern from just a thumbnail. Kinda resembles fellow Canadian Renee Paquette / Renee Young.
/r/MensRights26/08/16 02:46 AM
0

Depends on how your interpret the phrase 'rape culture'. If you take it to mean where we are prone to looking at everything as rape then I'd say we live in one.
/r/MensRights26/08/16 02:45 AM
5

It's pretty bad when a meager 100 days for this makes me happy because at least SOMETHING happened, when in an ideal world it should make us angry for it being such a slap on the wrist.
/r/MensRights26/08/16 02:45 AM
1

Sure you do. Either the accused admits to a consensual sex act (admit the whole thing as truth) or his entire admission is inadmissible. I'm beginning to wonder about the exact words used now. Like if the term implied finger-penetration or maybe just clit-rubbing.
/r/MensRights10/07/16 03:38 AM
1

My stance on turner is that that IF she was unconscious while he fingered her, there is no evidence he continued while having awareness of it. The difference between these cases, of course, is we actually know the person was unconscious during the sex act (the woman riding him never disputed that) and the unconscious person was doing this with their significant other and had no incentive to lie about events to seem like they had no fault in it.
/r/MensRights10/07/16 03:37 AM
1

Someone can be incapacitated as you forcibly envelope their body with your vagina too, so who's at fault?
/r/MensRights10/07/16 03:33 AM
1

He said he felt nauseous. That could be solely due to alcohol or due to a combination of alcohol and disgust.
/r/MensRights10/07/16 03:32 AM
1

I believe she probably fell asleep on the ambulance ride to the hospital after the paramedic pinched her (causing her to open her eyes) and she vomited with assistance. I believe she was drunker in the hospital then she ever was with Turner. She ate a full meal at 9pm which would slow the emptying of alchohol from her stomach into her slow intestine. Turner is an athlete (fast metabolism) and has no description of a meal to slow the alcohol, and was under stress (attacked by 4 guys) which causes…
/r/MensRights10/07/16 03:31 AM
1

You would do that by rubbing her clit. If a guy is planning to rape a woman he's not going to be all "gee, you know what would really increase friction? jamming some pine needles up there, my dick will love that"
/r/MensRights10/07/16 03:24 AM
1

The odd thing is, the one Swede I saw speak in an interview was also a white male, not sure about the other. American White Male vs European White Male could be more the issue.
/r/MensRights10/07/16 03:23 AM
2

Why do you think his is scripted and not the Swede's? Also they are reconcileable: The Swedes may very well have spoken to Turner before he got up. But he may not have heard them because this happened feet away from a frat party which probably had loud music blaring. It could merely have been coincidence that Brock was getting up at roughly the same time the cyclists talked to him, so they may have assumed wrongly that he was responding to them. Brock admits to running away after being tackled b…
/r/MensRights10/07/16 03:21 AM
1

That's what they SAY happened. I don't believe them. If they didn't justify their actions then they would be the ones charged with assault so they have incentive to tailor testimony to their needs.
/r/MensRights10/07/16 03:18 AM
2

It's wrong because it's technically incorrect and not funny because it trivializes us.
/r/MensRights10/06/16 08:26 AM
-1

He was not convicted of rape. The "sexual assault" charges were based on his admission of consensually fingerbanging her and her being intoxicated at the time, combined with Swedes saying she was unconcious even though in Brock's testimony he was conscious so that's BS. You can't just cherry-pick a story like that. If you rely on Brock's testimony that he finger-banged her then you also have to rely on his testimony she gave verbal consent for it.
/r/MensRights10/06/16 08:23 AM
1

I also am not here to condone the rape/sexual assault that took place Don't make statements like that if you don't want to debate whether he's guilty or not, because not everyone agrees that an assault took place at all, except of course, the Swedes assaulting Brock.
/r/MensRights10/06/16 08:22 AM
0

A guy knowingly fucking a sleeping woman is believable because he can get selfish pleasure out of it. All these situations you hear about where a guy is finger-banging or giving oral to an unconscious chick... no I do not in any way buy that he is aware of her passing out. One generally does not get selfish pleasure out of those two things, it is something you do for the other party's benefit at the sacrifice of muscle cramps in finger or tongue. Basically yeah, they were both intoxicated, but t…
/r/MensRights10/06/16 08:10 AM
-13

In all fairness I would not consider it rape if she were unaware he was unconscious. A girl could be riding a conscious guy and then close her eyes and put her brain solely in her vaginal nerves and be doing all the work moving and not notice for a good bit.
/r/MensRights10/06/16 08:05 AM
1

No sentence is appropriate, someone shouldn't be punished because a partner falls asleep during a consensual act. Brock claims that he stopped out of disgust and left and was attacked, so by his account, he voluntarily stopped for some reason, likely because he felt disgusted realizing he was finger-banging someone non-responsive. His own cognition was impaired by drink, so being slow to realize a partner passed out is understandable and he shouldn't be punished for that.
/r/MensRights10/06/16 08:03 AM
5

The thing is, Emily Doe claims to not remember anything (blackout) so it's not exactly her word against Brock Turner so much as it is the two Swedes who claimed to have seen him pelvic-thrusting on top of her and claimed she looked unconscious at the time. I think they were just jumping to conclusions and covering their asses, personally.
/r/MensRights10/06/16 08:02 AM
1

He was convicted so lets be fair Convictions do not mean it is fair for us to assume that they committed the crime they were convicted for, or that a crime occurred at all.
/r/MensRights10/06/16 08:00 AM
8

The Swedes DID NOT observe him fingering her. They have never claimed that they did. Yeah, strangely what they describe is seeing him on top doing pelvic thrusting, which is completely inconsistent with the evidence (and conviction) of finger-banging, which you wouldn't really have any reason to do pelvic thrusting for. Shoulder-thrusting maybe, but I always figured it was mostly in the wrists. Do Swedes often confuse upper and lower torso like this? he says he stood up to leave and go vomit. Th…
/r/MensRights10/06/16 07:58 AM
2

Fuck, in a fair world we'd be pissed at the judge for imposing ANY sentence, but in this twisted world I can almost appreciate he gave a slap on the wrist. Like realistically he knew he couldn't get away with throwing it out, but knew there was no clear evidence of guilt, so when the jury got emotionally manipulated he stepped in to minimized the damage.
/r/MensRights10/06/16 07:52 AM
1

Some may have remained skeptical but then been convinced by the 2 witness statements. I'm still skeptical though. These guys don't have to be maniacal man-haters to lie about the incident. They may have seen a guy walking away from a girl he was fucking earlier (not knowing whether she was conscious at the time) and then later come back and seen him walking away from her and noticed she was unconscious and jumped to conclusions and attacked him and then revised their stories to say "he was fucki…
/r/MensRights10/06/16 07:50 AM
0

I am not convinced that Carl-Fredrik Arndt and Peter Jonsson are heroes. What I do believe, based on the attending police officer's testimony, is that Carl was sitting on Brock's legs and Peter along with 2 other guys named Barnett and Sinclair, were holding Brock's arms down. For all I know, they lied about Brock being on top of the woman when they arrived. Brock says he was already walking away before the guys tackled him. He also did not mention any verbal warning, and did not remembering run…
/r/MensRights10/06/16 02:45 AM
0

AV4M has become cancer the past years, may as well ask the Badgers if they'll publish you. The sites are linked but I won't fault the ladies for exploiting the popular platform to get going, and will judge them on their own merits.
/r/MensRights10/06/16 02:40 AM
2

I'm confused why she's convinced she was assaulted. Not remembering giving consent doesn't mean you didn't give it.
/r/MensRights10/06/16 02:38 AM
-1

How is this minimizing?
/r/MensRights10/06/16 02:37 AM
1

Persky should be punished not for handing out a sentence too light, but too heavy, since he shouldn't be convicted at all, as there's no evidence that the woman was unconscious when they he was fingering her. The cops said she was unconscious when they arrived but it can take a bit for the full effect of alcohol to affect you, or you can fall asleep during sex if someone's not particularly good at it.
/r/MensRights10/06/16 02:36 AM
-8

This is bullshit, no proof the guy was guilty anyway, just based on 2 lying bros willing to lie to protect a woman's virtue and get a chance to be heroes. Their story about seeing pelvic thrusting is contradicted by there only being evidence of digital penetration.
/r/MensRights10/06/16 02:34 AM
0

I'm not convinced this guy is guilty
/r/MensRights10/06/16 02:24 AM
1

I found it a bit confusing though. Do you figure my guess is right? Pizzey probably associated with feminists if she attended women's lib and could've been perceived as feminist herself, but in her mind not identified as that even while working with them at certain goals like protecting women from domestic violence or whatever other women's lib stuff it referred to. First thought at how to resolve the issue.
/r/MensRights06/10/15 07:12 AM
1

Which MRA leaders other than Paul Elam have taken the fight to the feminists? Plenty take the fight to them, whether they identify or are labelled an MRA leader prob doesn't matter. Badgers do it, Roosh does it, YouTubers do it, hasn't Milo Y even done some?
/r/MensRights05/10/15 07:14 AM
1

I think we should make potential liberal voters aware of them, just like I'd make potential Hilary-crat voters aware of her 'women are the primary victims of war' crap, or potential NDP aware of Roosh-hasslin'.
/r/MensRights05/10/15 07:12 AM
1

The GQ article didn't tell me much, but the response to it told me lots. They get so butthurt over the red herring associated with him that they start making up all kinds of shit about him and insult him to show how against him they are.
/r/MensRights05/10/15 07:11 AM
1

will prob go Libertarian since they took Laura Southern back
/r/MensRights05/10/15 07:10 AM
1

I read that 2009 statement by her, but I must've been remembering this 2001 article http://www.theguardian.com/world/2001/nov/26/gender.uk1 Author wrongly conflated going to a women's lib workshop with being in feminist movement I guess.
/r/MensRights05/10/15 07:10 AM
1

also wouldn't having a federal party with power more aid MPPs getting more coverage and chances to win locally?
/r/MensRights27/08/15 05:51 PM
1

Sounds like she might be one of those actually-meaning-egalitarian classic Farrell/Pizzey type feminists? Let's find the shittiest things she's said, if they're not outrageous I can dig with it. I used to call myself a feminist in high school, I can forgive the error. Sometimes egalitarians are too busy doing shit to learn a proper vocabulary.
/r/MensRights27/08/15 05:50 PM
1

I have been soured as fuck against all the major parties. Progressive Conservatives are anti-sex, Liberals have Kathleen Wynn launching those anti-man ads, NDPs have that drug dealer attacking Roosh, Libertarians kicked out that awesome chick who was refuting 'Rape Culture', who's even left, party Quebecois? Sure, why the fuck not, Green Party it is, I love windmills. I don't intend to get married so divorce would only affect me indirectly, but I guess it's possible to get kidnapped and married …
/r/MensRights27/08/15 05:49 PM
2

Honey badgers may give a fuck so technically "almost no one" would be more accurate. I can't seem to keep collected in my head who writes what article, but I know I've liked some I've read at AVFM, inevitably some of them must've been from Elam. If anything, at least he has a decent site up with some interesting people, like Robert St. Estephe who manages to find all kinds of cool historical newspaper clippings, even if he seems to think we only want to read his retyping of them and not see phot…
/r/MensRights27/08/15 05:40 PM
1

Does he mention attacking the entire WP/TM or simply authors who've been published in them? Big diff.
/r/MensRights27/08/15 05:36 PM
2

Searched your quote, found https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/3illyr/paul_elam_one_of_the_top_10_most_embarrassing/ which links to http://www.houstonpress.com/news/the-10-most-embarrassing-houstonians-7681068 with him as the lead image. I see... Although he's the first image, he's numbered 10 on the list, wouldn't that mean the author's saying there are 9 who are more embarassing? Does being called a joke by Jef Rouner necessarily mean you are one though? Rouner would not be the first …
/r/MensRights27/08/15 05:35 PM
1

I'm trying to understand the timeline here 9 April 2013 Dan Perrins http://www.avoiceformen.com/education/little-red-frothing-fornication-mouth/ 23 April 2013 Danielle Paradis (coincidence initials?) and Anne Theriault http://rabble.ca/blogs/bloggers/feminist-current/2013/04/mens-rights-activists-advocate-human-rights-rape-and-death-t This mentions: This woman, who has been re-christened “Little Red Frothing Fornication Mouth” (so charming!) by A Voice for Men So assuming that it was Dan Perrins…
/r/MensRights27/08/15 05:32 PM
0

I don't agree, text bubbles engage a back-and-forth dialogue to readers better, even with low-quality art. If anything the MS paint style nudity helps to inform us of whether the readers are the type to focus on the actual messages, or if whether they will take the easy route and nitpick their conveyance.
/r/MensRights02/05/15 02:01 AM
0

I did not create these comics, the person who did is an adult, but I will not volunteer their ID as they are not the focus of this discussion.
/r/MensRights02/05/15 01:59 AM
1

I’m kind of put off by Roosh trying to sell this interview as an ‘ambush’. He’s not dumb, he’s written more about how the media perceives the manosphere than most MRAs Him having some awareness would not negate it being an ambushed. It seems more like you think an ambush shouldn't matter because Roosh should be prepped. But it's one thing to be prepped in theory, and another thing to go through the experience. It's easy to get charmed by people prepping him on the show and being nice to him to g…
/r/TheRedPill01/05/15 05:11 AM
1

The clips on Dr. Oz's site (which OP thankfully copied, good job OP) do not represent the entire segment. Does anyone have a copy of the video they played at the end with the 3 fat women? We need access to this to review it folks. It was memorable.
/r/TheRedPill01/05/15 04:42 AM
2

Of course there is Imagine how much the lasso would help in getting the real story out of reporters.
/r/MensRights26/04/15 06:11 AM
1

Artists minus RTIT
/r/MensRights26/04/15 06:09 AM
1

Having them reciprocate is ideal, but even if they don't, if you orgasm during intercourse and they do not then you should still do it. I mean otherwise, if you orgasm during sex, orgasm during your BJ, they orgasm during cunn, then it's a 2:1 orgasm ratio. Course that could be balanced by 2 oral orgasms for her for every 1 bj and 1 intercourse orgasm for you.
/r/MensRights24/04/15 08:33 AM
1

Apparently we're the only ones, judging by other replies
/r/MensRights24/04/15 08:31 AM
2

Tired of being hassled, I basically ignored a girl who asked me out in HS since she was a total stranger so I felt confident it was a joke with her friends.
/r/MensRights24/04/15 08:11 AM
2

Miss Piggy is more attractive than the majority of women. No chance of preggers, nice curls, felt may be machine-washable, talented actress, only have to compete with amphibians, a lot of pluses here.
/r/MensRights24/04/15 08:10 AM
1

I think slut has become a lot less hurtful with time. We have the almost comical "sloot" making its way where it's clearly sarcastic and done in good humor. Not to mention applications of broad usage like Bridget Jones' "sluttish washing up". 'Whore' is also taken back when an embrace of sex work. Ass/Creep/Creeper/Douche/Pig are far more hurtful and nowhere near positiveness as all the female terms. I've been thinking we could get men to practise walking silently like ninja and take back creep/…
/r/MensRights24/04/15 08:09 AM
1

More accurately I think women like the charismas players develope but want him to single-player game her.
/r/MensRights24/04/15 08:06 AM
1

Yes, obviously we should have asked to get to know her better, women dictate the standards by which we should have sex.
/r/MensRights24/04/15 08:05 AM
32

Does that mean we can go call every woman who claimed to be raped a liar and say we have proof and that she is a terrorist and it's okay because it's for art?
/r/MensRights24/04/15 08:02 AM
6

This lie is still not as bad as this actual truth: Even if a man consents to procreate with a woman, it's always rape, because of men living in a legally coercive environment which does not respect his right to procreative control.
/r/MensRights24/04/15 08:00 AM
0

I'm not sure if her views on Islam are THAT extreme but she's got some issues: http://www.avoiceformen.com/feminism/ayaan-hirsi-alis-feigned-fear-of-men-in-her-family-and-the-lie-of-a-forced-marriage/
/r/MensRights24/04/15 07:58 AM
-2

I hope that it becomes the prerogative of this world to support women like Ayaan Hirsi Ali LOL no! http://www.avoiceformen.com/feminism/ayaan-hirsi-alis-feigned-fear-of-men-in-her-family-and-the-lie-of-a-forced-marriage/ Educate urself bro
/r/MensRights24/04/15 07:58 AM
1

I think we should find a better person for this poster than Ayaan Hirsi Ali to hold up as a role model. Sekhar Chandra outed her bullshit last month: http://www.avoiceformen.com/feminism/ayaan-hirsi-alis-feigned-fear-of-men-in-her-family-and-the-lie-of-a-forced-marriage/ So we should retire this poster and not praise her.
/r/MensRights24/04/15 07:57 AM
3

Not necessarily, no. The men are probably just paid actors. They may not even know that the entire scope of the project is a sexist one. They might only know the individual scene they shot, which in and of itself is not a problem. The problem is that they didn't balance it.
/r/MensRights02/04/15 01:27 PM
2

I think it is worthwhile to transcribe the this commercial for those who may not wish to watch the entire thing, though I would recommend doing so. Guy 1: "Thanks for keeping your mouth shut" (while touching girl who is reacting to light as if she were drunk) Guy 2: "Thanks for minding your own business" (while rubbing shoulders of female coworker) Guy 3: "Thanks for not telling my girlfriend" (while showing photographs of her to his friends at school) Guy 4: "Thanks for not telling anyone" (whi…
/r/MensRights02/04/15 01:25 PM
1

OP ask your friend if his son had just watched this guy on Monday March 30th: http://vizualdze.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/CBYtVjtWYAAqczu.jpg
/r/MensRights02/04/15 01:15 PM
1

I really love Louise Belcher and Mabel Pines, Kristen Schaal getting on board with this silliness has my heart torn
/r/MensRights29/03/15 07:49 AM
1

I liked it, gradually progressing ongoing plot elements with a lot of episodic throwaway-but-interesting mixed in.
/r/MensRights25/02/15 12:44 AM
6

It is unjust to award his ex-wife all that money, but it's not going to have any effect on his life. Yes it will effect his life. I agree it's hard to empathize when we're not that rich, but it's still an effect, however survivable.
/r/MensRights25/02/15 12:41 AM
2

I thought this case was more about alimony than CS
/r/MensRights25/02/15 12:40 AM
7

It's difficult to resist our biological wiring to trust females, I guess? No matter how many examples of bad women screwing guys over, a lot of us are prone to mentally compartmentalizing the suspicion and putting faith in someone because we are charmed.
/r/MensRights25/02/15 12:39 AM
1

Whatever lip-service she gave to our issues, she called her campaign "HeForShe", that says it all.
/r/MensRights31/01/15 05:26 AM
1

Idealism I guess :(
/r/MensRights31/01/15 05:25 AM
1

The typo is more due to incoherent rage typing on an iPad I enterpret feminism I feel compelled to forgive you, having experienced much rage trying to type on a tablet, and these pad things are even smaller...
/r/MensRights31/01/15 05:25 AM
2

Source? Whether 22 or 31 I must be skeptical of these multipliers. What if these are skewed by: 1) relations with biological males being under-reported 2) relations with non-biological females being under-reported 3) false accusations against non-biological males
/r/MensRights31/01/15 05:23 AM
1

True, in the middle of Being Human and Person of Interest, awaiting next season of Doctor Who.
/r/MensRights31/01/15 05:22 AM
6

femanist We want the same thing. Equality between the genders Typo has me skeptical, wondering if this is bait to the standard "feminism is not about equality" information you will get, hoping for some slander along with it. MRA is also not necessarily about equality either, although I do think more of us are probably for it. In both cases there is a perspective regarding the advancing of the situation of members of a certain gender through certain changes. MRA being more specific in the 'rights…
/r/MensRights31/01/15 12:12 AM
3

One of them recently told me that it's difficult to tell with me since I rarely am rude to any of them (why is that a standard for being uninterested again? No idea, I'm usually nice to girls I'm not interested in unless they're mean to me. Conversely, an idea is spread that sometimes "rudeness" attracts women, which could lead men to be rude to women they're interested in. Insert debate about rudeness vs. confidence/non-doormat
/r/MensRights21/09/14 11:14 PM
4

I am having some trouble understanding the context of #NotYourShield and am hoping someone else has insight into the meaning. Best I can guess... it means something like SJWs say GG is all men and some GG supporters are women and object to 'women oppose GG' lies being used as a criticism shield?
/r/MensRights21/09/14 11:12 PM
1

It goes beyond blindness to excessive force in MvM. This was not excessive in any way... I mean it's not as if Ray curb-stomped her after she went down, that would've been. He deflected her as she charged.
/r/MensRights21/09/14 11:06 PM
7

If Emma doesn't see the problem with the gender bias in her statement, she's stupid. If she sees it and it doesn't matter to her, then her intentions are not pure, and she is NOT genuinely good.
/r/MensRights21/09/14 10:29 PM
5

While that's nice to hear, supporting the role of dads in raising daughters doesn't make up for only focusing on that bit of importance.
/r/MensRights21/09/14 10:05 PM
10

Wanting to include us so that we might exclusively aid only females doesn't seem like a right direction to me.
/r/MensRights21/09/14 10:04 PM
3

They got to Hermione damnit, this hurts me deep.
/r/MensRights21/09/14 10:02 PM
4

I googled "DV parity" and http://www.theguardian.com/society/2010/sep/05/men-victims-domestic-violence came up claiming we're over 40% of victims, that's something.
/r/MensRights20/09/14 06:24 AM
-3

The link at the top is a reddit thread spawned by this article: http://newmediarockstars.com/2014/09/is-4chan-finally-done-with-founder-moot/ Before condemning moot, I want to see some evidence. When exactly was the "xoxofest" he apparently tweeted about? Are we really going to condemn a guy's body of work solely because he tweets about someone? Bringing awareness to someone talking isn't necessarily agreeing with it. Perhaps he thought it was a spectacle. I have to question the neutrality of Ne…
/r/MensRights20/09/14 02:33 AM
6

What disgusts us is hardly a double standard. I usually find lesbians more arousing than 2 guys getting it on, that's also a double standard.
/r/MensRights20/09/14 02:14 AM
4

The article initially gets our hopes up, but it eventually disappoints... most of us would agree that to equate a victim of violent rape and a man who engages in a drunken sexual act he wouldn’t have chosen when sober is to trivialize a terrible crime. It is safe to assume that the vast majority of the CDC’s male respondents who were “made to penetrate” someone would not call themselves rape victims—and with good reason. As Erry points out, the is no support for (a) saying there is a good reason…
/r/MensRights20/09/14 02:12 AM
5

It appears that they took over /r/feminism which sucks since it is now no longer about discussing that topic, but more of an /r/feminists for self-back-patting
/r/MensRights20/09/14 01:56 AM
1

well, YT equiv then. Plus I think they're overtaxed and may not watch private videos unless they get reported.
/r/MensRights20/09/14 01:52 AM
1

a man must be level-headed and wise about it and let the woman bruise and bloody you up a little before I agree it's a wise decision due to an unfair system, but it sucks we must feel obligated to hold back and put ourselves at higher risk in the short-term out of consideration for our long-term well-being.
/r/MensRights20/09/14 01:51 AM
1

I dunno, depends on what drama we affix to verbs like cry/whore.
/r/MensRights20/09/14 01:50 AM
1

I would not classify it's use as homophobic, phobia means fear. Insulting people for a perceived lack of manliness is not the same as inferring they are womanly, that is only true if one accepts a dichotomy, not all do.
/r/MensRights20/09/14 01:49 AM
1

I'm not sure Ray saying he thinks he assaulted her to try and minimize unfair punishment necessarily means he really believes he was at fault in any way.
/r/MensRights20/09/14 01:48 AM
0

That child in no way, shape, or form was able to defend himself. Sure they are, just in a minuscule and negligible way.
/r/MensRights20/09/14 01:47 AM
2

Your friends suck. Ask to be quoted, and mention all you said was -Id do the same thing- It is not as if you added anything.
/r/MensRights16/09/14 02:59 AM
3

After the indictment the charges got dropped though, after he agreed to counseling. The concept of aggravated assault confuses me in this situation. He was not merely aggravated IMO, but defending himself against a wild-woman who launched herself at him after he had backed away as far as possible (stopped by elevator wall) trying to de-escalate. The only counseling he needs is that if someone hits you, you should file charges immediately and not follow them and try to talk things out.
/r/MensRights16/09/14 02:58 AM
-1

Being small does not make a child defenseless, although I think it is reasonable to think them less capable of it than Ms Rice was. Ray was only defending himself, he should not be penalized in any way, and enjoy victim counselling while his wife should be forced to go to anger management classes to prevent her from slapping and elbowing and tackling her husband around elevators.
/r/MensRights16/09/14 02:56 AM
1

TBH I did not even notice the initials matching the expanded -human rights- initialism variant at first, that only came later after I first noticed this portion of the image
/r/MensRights16/09/14 02:46 AM
2

Poster re-writer fucked up, "when" is duplicated. I bet if we had posters about muggings and talked about how muggins can happen when you're alone in strange areas not paying attention that it wouldn't get "muggings happen when muggers decide to mug" bullshit.
/r/MensRights13/08/14 02:36 AM
3

I have mixed feelings about this. On one hand, a law allowing you to do evil doesn't justify it. But on the other, for every public trial we put against people who utilize biased law, many other cases will fly under the radar, making us give undue attention to only some cases. Better to fix the law being exploited that is the root issue.
/r/MensRights13/08/14 02:33 AM
2

Makes me wonder if a kid secretly taped a foster parent raping them and put it on YT if judge would also take it down.
/r/MensRights13/08/14 02:31 AM
0

Strongly tempted to post some Eric/Ariel porn upon seeing this, but that would be off-topic I guess. Can't help but picture Ariel inflicting this damage with her tail though. Am now wondering if feminists would protest Eric ramming his ship through Ursula as some kind of phallic symbol.
/r/MensRights13/08/14 02:28 AM
-1

If the glans responds lowest on fine-touch perception then this tells me that we may need a different test to evaluate the importance here. I'm circumcised and I feel much more sensitive on the end than on the sides.
/r/MensRights13/08/14 02:27 AM
1

The word "attempt" is usable pretty loosely. If it's not a serious attempt, it's more like attention-whoring.
/r/MensRights13/08/14 01:58 AM
3

then I hope you at least laid a defensive foot on some
/r/MensRights13/08/14 01:57 AM
1

equating gay men to women is a homophobic, heterosexist slur I don't agree with that. Making such an equation would not mean you were afraid of gay people or that you preferred heterosexuality.
/r/MensRights13/08/14 01:46 AM
4

In case anyone is wondering this is the image which provoked this campaign: http://cdn29.elitedaily.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/SBMF-275211.jpg Which was accompanied by this text: “Only I have the right to decide what to do with my own body: the type of birth control I use or when and if I have sex. Boys don’t have to worry about the government deciding whether or not they can have an abortion.” and it got this response: http://intactnews.org/sites/default/files/cynthia-maloney.jpg It is part…
/r/MensRights13/08/14 01:27 AM
1

This isn't presented as a criminal defense. What people think laws should be is what lead laws to be formed.
/r/MensRights27/07/14 08:33 AM
1

I would argue that it would not be misogyny even if you were not penalized for it. Furthermore, it would not be misogyny if the game rewarded you if there was an actual advantage towards doing so for the hit-man, like causing a distraction so that you could get at an otherwise inaccessible target. It would only approach misogyny if you were rewarded for no meaningful in-universe reason.
/r/MensRights27/07/14 08:33 AM
1

invulnerable and unkillable in every game the same way as children in videogames not if you have the proper mods or the right game: pick up the children just to have you throw them in and let them drown have your creature eat the children while the mother is watching Nothing beats B&W
/r/MensRights27/07/14 08:18 AM
1

I assumed that since people were talking about putting females in CoD that there weren't any, did not bother to investigate. wants to see arguments about how Diablo is sexist because there's always 1 more playable male class than female
/r/MensRights27/07/14 08:03 AM
1

What does? Thinking it would be cool if you could rape people in addition to ramming them with your car in GTA?
/r/MensRights27/07/14 08:01 AM
1

it would look like we're trying to pick a fight with them rather than focus on the real perpetrator Disney does not exist in a void. They make what they think will sell to a public influenced by feminist propaganda. There isn't a sole perpetrator, there's a collection of issues and people. Furthermore: making a parody would not be for the sole purpose of generating outcry from feminist, but to provoke thought from anyone who sees it. Like "this isn't funny, but it's the same as the film, so why …
/r/MensRights27/07/14 08:00 AM
1

Obi Wan is justified in assaulting the Storm Troopers because they represent a threat, and a real danger to them. Isn't everyone hypothetically a potential threat to everything in at least a slight obscure way though? I suppose it's about the level of threat, TBH am not that intimate with the politics of SW. From prequel trilogy it became an empire, not the most democratic, but then, even in a democracy if one is in the minority and having to live at the whims of the majority it still kinda suck…
/r/MensRights27/07/14 07:52 AM
1

I don't think think so, there is a difference between encouraging someone to do nothing and defending them from people pressuring them to do something. For example, if I was chasing a fat guy in a truck and shooting at his feet with a pellet gun shouting "run fatty run, get that cardio in!" and someone stopped me and told me it was wrong to do that, it would not be the same as that person telling the fat person they should not run and lose weight.
/r/MensRights27/07/14 07:50 AM
1

That's not what the person you were responding to was criticizing though. Having "random" partners is not the same as having "many" partners. Plus "lots of sex" does not necessarily mean "many partners". The guy is criticizing random hookups (sex with people you don't know well and lacking criteria for choosing them) and you falsely portrayed him as criticizing someone who has sex frequently, that is arguing a straw man. The person you are criticizing is using a better and more common definition…
/r/MensRights27/07/14 07:47 AM
1

He kissed her and made her cry! Assault! Look at her blush in outrage about being sexually objectified and touched without permission!
/r/MensRights25/07/14 03:04 AM
1

about a girl with a mind control device that makes human boys do whatever she wants them to, not something about building a robot guy. Was referring to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/How_to_Build_a_Better_Boy not https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zapped both were discussed. It is specifically a movie about a sympathetic protagonist who completely strips away any free will and agency that males around her have, for her own gratification. For lack of a better word, mindrape. Multiple times. Isn't Obi-W…
/r/MensRights25/07/14 03:02 AM
1

most recent studies say it's around 2-8% Am skeptical of their variable controls. Slut-shaming is wrong. The only reason you would think less of a woman for having lots of sex is because you have backwards, sexist beliefs. You are speaking about slut-shaming as if it applies exclusively to women, it doesn't, I can describe shaming men I consider sluts as slut-shaming too. You are also making assumptions about how I define sluttiness. "Having lots of sex" is not the criteria I base the idea of 's…
/r/MensRights25/07/14 02:48 AM
1

Incorrect, it is possible to slut-shame while being gender-neutral about it.
/r/MensRights25/07/14 02:45 AM
1

they encourage women to not report to the police Which feminists in particular do this? I have not come across such advocacy so far. Closest I can see is advocacy that whether or not to come forward is their choice and that they should not feel obligated to do one or the other.
/r/MensRights25/07/14 02:45 AM
1

Your adjective addition is correct and I ought to have added it. Although one might argue a lack of one is ambiguous and that 'most' or 'all' would be required to be an explicit generalization, and that a lack is merely a subtle implication easily interpreted as one.
/r/MensRights25/07/14 02:43 AM
1

Hm.. like they feel they're owed a relationship for volunteering their chivalry? How would they rank compared to other kinds of people who might get mad about being friendzoned? Even those who don't white-knight can be irked about it.
/r/MensRights25/07/14 02:42 AM
1

there are men who have a cuckold fetish, and would be attracted to promiscuous women Japanese term this "netorare" or "NTR" abbreviated. Initially I hated this kinda stuff but after awhile the appeal sorta grew on me. Not exclusively or preferentially of course, but as some variety to stories.
/r/MensRights25/07/14 02:39 AM
1

I would argue that you can compare ANYTHING, but that there is a clear divide in seriousness. In fact, by ranking rape allegations as worse than slut accusations, we HAVE compared them, and found them unequal.
/r/MensRights25/07/14 02:37 AM
1

It's too bad the common public doesn't understand the physics of fighting.
/r/MensRights25/07/14 02:36 AM
1

PussyPass+PenisFault really.
/r/MensRights24/07/14 09:05 AM
3

He used a leg sweep rather than striking her. Ironically enough, in some cases a nice punch to the arm would probably dissuade an attacking woman with less danger of brain damage. I don't even want to call this a leg-sweep. That implies you're letting them fall IMO. It's more like a controlled lowering. I'd call it a 'dip', like a dance move, with the "speed" she "fell" with.
/r/MensRights24/07/14 09:05 AM
2

I'd like to see how those guys would really react if it happened to them. I'd probably turtle the fuck up and back away and possibly get hit by a bus because I'm a coward. Not just the woman (though there is that 'she might stab me' fear) but of how even the slightest defense might accidentally look like she's being hurt and cause me to get knifed by surrounding males conditioned to hate their own by feminist propaganda. Very impressed by this guy's calm self control and restraint. He relatively…
/r/MensRights24/07/14 09:03 AM
7

Women want equality, and that is what she got. actually it isn't what she got, the guy still treated her with kid gloves for being a woman women complain because we're nudging SLIGHTLY in the direction of equality, for bothering to apply even a minimal increase in force when engaging them defensively
/r/MensRights24/07/14 09:01 AM
2

Those two 18 year old boys are going so hard into a life of perpetual friendzoning. Please elaborate on this theory.
/r/MensRights24/07/14 09:00 AM
5

Guy could've thrown her into a wall like a rag doll due to size difference, was a gentle teddy bear really.
/r/MensRights24/07/14 08:59 AM
2

"maybe if we add a big enough sound the public won't realize there was no actual impact, or that if there was, it was minimal" pro wrestling 101, slap dat thigh ADR
/r/MensRights24/07/14 08:59 AM
2

If this is the case I am disappointed there was no "Shoryuken!" added when the busdriver "you going to jail now!" guy put his female attacker down.
/r/MensRights24/07/14 08:58 AM
-2

I wouldn't say it's entirely a pussy pass. Had she attacked a woman, she would not get the same pass. It's more like a combination pussy+dick pass.
/r/MensRights24/07/14 08:56 AM
5

gets him on the news even more so they can spin it to make him look worse and have others attack him on the streets a major reason I would be fearful of pressing charges, public loves a male boogie-man
/r/MensRights24/07/14 08:56 AM
5

was probably too good a guy. Why does not pressing charges make him good? Let's not applaud the guy here, he probably avoided pressing them for the same reasons many of us might avoid doing so... 1) it's a hassle, takes time to do 2) there's a risk that by bringing attention to police he'll be viewed as aggressor 3) he will be shamed by society and possibly become a target for violence by men and women who want to prove themselves There are rational selfish and justified reasons why one would no…
/r/MensRights24/07/14 08:55 AM
1

Didn't even know until now that Razor made adult-sized scooters.
/r/MensRights24/07/14 08:52 AM
2

Yet the media does the 'boom' effect for falls thinking they will. Many probably do, but aren't the type to be vocal on facebook because they're idiots and can't maintain an argument.
/r/MensRights24/07/14 08:50 AM
1

The most reliable studies indicate 2-8% of rape accusations are false. cite or GTFO, and your 2% shit is discredited a made-up crap when backtraced There are legitimate criticisms to be had against the MRM. Name one. Or do you mean against individual MRAs? "If you don't like being called a slut, then stop fucking and sucking random dudes you meet in bars and parties" is slut shaming, which is something that TRPs do. The primary problem straw-manning, because it assumes the person called slut is …
/r/MensRights24/07/14 07:29 AM
1

Not even defamation without context since it's slang that can mean any variety of things based on individual standards. Rape is far more clear-cut an accusation than sluttiness.
/r/MensRights24/07/14 07:27 AM
1

they are both reputational damage that will cause other people to treat them differently Yes, but to different degrees. You're comparing the secret pork-eater in the vegetarian club to the secret cannibal.
/r/MensRights24/07/14 07:27 AM
1

I'm thinking something more along the line of 'dumpster diver'.
/r/MensRights24/07/14 07:26 AM
1

Incorrect, so-called 'decent' girls can like guys with promiscuous pasts since they may be ignorant of that background.
/r/MensRights24/07/14 07:25 AM
1

let me know when a guy has to change schools When has a girl HAD to change school for having a 'slut' reputation?
/r/MensRights24/07/14 07:25 AM
2

Slut shaming is comparable to virgin shaming ( both are wrong) I view virgin-shaming as worse. It's like advocating worth on the basis of interaction. Slut-shaming at least has some better reason attached to it, like someone gaining a sense of worth based on coupling with low-worth individuals.
/r/MensRights24/07/14 07:24 AM
1

I wouldn't say that, rape and false accusations can sometimes be equal and sometimes A is worse than B, other times B is worse than A. Depends on the baggage attached.
/r/MensRights24/07/14 07:23 AM
1

I view slut-shaming and false rape allegations as more or less morally equivalent. Then your morals are out of whack. If you believe that women are being robbed of something by engaging in casual sex with a strange man, then why should we not punish men for doing that robbing? Slut-shaming does not inherently mean we think casual sex with strange men robs women of anything. It is not strangeness that is an issue. It is not casualness that is an issue. It has to do with perception of other people…
/r/MensRights24/07/14 07:22 AM
1

slut shaming, don't do that People are free to express their views about others' behavior. Anyone should be able to have sex as much as they want without being shamed and insulted for it. People should be free to insult others if they don't approve of their lifestyle.
/r/MensRights24/07/14 07:19 AM
0

guy knocks a girl out, obviously rape. Wrong, not if she asks him to. Girl is passed out. Obviously rape Wrong, not if she gives prior consent to passed-out-sex. Girl says no and guy forces her. Obviously rape. Wrong, not if she consents to roleplay such a scenario.
/r/MensRights24/07/14 07:17 AM
2

Let's thank the 'where there's smoke there's fire' bullshitters for that.
/r/MensRights24/07/14 05:37 AM
1

It does only deal with stuff the police encounter. False accusations would clearly occur at a much higher rate when reported to non-police since there's less chance of consequence for being caught in a lie.
/r/MensRights24/07/14 05:36 AM
1

If she and her victim are at the same college she can easily just go to the college authorities in fact she is encouraged to do so and never pressurized to go to the cops, or thought suspicious or thought to be aiding a criminal if she doesn't. "aiding a criminal" confuses me, does it refer to the crime of false allegation (aiding herself?) or the crime of rape for not reporting a hypothetical rapist?
/r/MensRights24/07/14 04:52 AM
2

To be fair, this is the first in a series called "Annabelle Unleashed" and the sequel is "Girls Acting Catty". Although "are dogs" and "acting catty" aren't exactly equivalent expressions... the first is a metaphor and the second is merely an adjective.
/r/MensRights24/07/14 03:48 AM
2

There aren't enough of us, to get normal people to understand the issue is better done through clearly understood concepts like comparative hypocrisy.
/r/MensRights24/07/14 03:43 AM
2

That will not solve the problem or bring light to it. I don't agree, feminist outcry about a parody would bring light to it. Calling and writing Disney to denounce this bullshit will be better. Private contact does not necessarily 'bring light' to anything nor necessarily solve anything. Bringing it to the attention of prominent MRAs and MRA groups. Good, but eventually they need to do something, which is what, your cool letter-writing campaign? That doesn't create public awareness. Your suggest…
/r/MensRights24/07/14 03:42 AM
0

Sometimes we want to enjoy bad surprises on their own merit. Being told how bad they are in advance spoils our spontaneous outrage.
/r/MensRights24/07/14 03:40 AM
3

Can play PSP while holding warrior pose, feminist mind blown.
/r/MensRights24/07/14 03:39 AM
1

YTV has a show called 'Every Witch Way', I watch it because I like witches. In it there is a girl who casts a spell on a boy so that he is forced to say the opposite of whatever it is he intends to say. Of course, she is the antagonist of the show, and the guy finds a way to beat the spell (he opts to intend to say the opposite of what he wants, which is reversed to say what he wants) so it all works out. We need to look at this situationally: does this commercial tell us what actually happens i…
/r/MensRights24/07/14 03:36 AM
1

Keep meaning to get back in to webcomics, this was on the list of things... Pretty sure the girl's "oh no!" in upper-right panel is sarcastic... and the "aw Cloud, that's not" before she was cut off seems like probably "not fair". Not sure to take that to mean "it's not fair, I want more than a peck" or if she's continuing the sarcasm of not wanting kiss-punishment when clearly this is one of those "no means yes" situations discernable by tone of voice. Perhaps ongoing readers would better know …
/r/MensRights24/07/14 03:18 AM
48

Isn't this more irony than satire?
/r/MensRights24/07/14 03:14 AM
5

Do not instruct car owners to lock their doors, instead plaster signs on outside of cars saying 'please do not steal this'.
/r/MensRights24/07/14 03:13 AM
1

Pretty sure if prostitution were legalized, it would be regulated and actually reduce illegal trafficking.
/r/MensRights18/07/14 03:14 AM
1

That said, for rape reporting to go down when prostitution goes up, do you think it is mere coincidence? Or do you think rape rates remained the same and something about increased prostitution actually made women more scared to report rape? One would logically assume legal prostitution would: 1) result in more prostitutes reporting rape that occurs in the pursuit of their profession 2) result in less sexually frustrated potential rapists who rape less
/r/MensRights18/07/14 03:14 AM
0

Most boys have begun puberty by 12 so I don't view that as within the range.
/r/MensRights18/07/14 03:02 AM
2

ITT we complain about women getting reasonable sentences and being treated fairly by the media because what we're really mad about is men getting unreasonable ones and unfair media treatment.
/r/MensRights18/07/14 03:01 AM
6

I'm skeptical of the idea that there were not men opposing women's suffrage. I won't advance the idea that men opposed it more than women did (though I don't oppose that either) but surely it was not exclusively women who opposed the idea.
/r/MensRights18/07/14 02:43 AM
2

TB it seems like you may be representing Wikipedia wrongly. Calling a specific subreddit about a topic 'controversial' is not the same as calling the actual topic controversial. Case in point, /r/technology is also listed there. Wikipedia is saying that the subreddit about technology has controversies related to it. I suppose the topic of technology has controversies too, but I don't believe that is what Wikipedia is saying. Even if it was... being listed alongside technology is a rather good ro…
/r/MensRights18/07/14 02:42 AM
-2

In elementary school playing chess, everyone would say "I'm raping you" when there's a check or checkmate, even when we didn't even know what "rape" actually meant. You didn't, sure they didn't?
/r/MensRights12/07/14 07:37 AM
0

I think it would be fair to say that on average, females who claim to be fans are less devoted than males who claim to be fans. This is not to say that genuine female fans are less devoted (that's another argument) but rather that the higher number of fake female fans that are inevitable would drag down the average.
/r/MensRights12/07/14 07:37 AM
0

Having female characters in CoD is a waste of money because mostly men buy CoD. It's called economics. I agree with your GTA point but maybe it's due to ignorance of CoD but wouldn't it just require changing an avatar? Doesn't seem too costly. Would having an option to play female soldiers really lower the number of game buys?
/r/MensRights12/07/14 07:35 AM
4

just so you know, using phrases like "treat you like a girl" is very sexist. No, it isn't. It describes stereotypical ways in which people behave toward females. it says that there are set things that all women do, which is false What's false in your interpretation. Saying "the NPC treats you like a girl" could be describing something like an AI holding open a door and saying "here miss". This isn't at all making generalizations about women, but rather, recognizing that people do so and reflecti…
/r/MensRights12/07/14 07:34 AM
0

You are absolutely not a gamer. There's absolutely no way you've ever had any experience playing games online I believe you are ignoring the possibility that CEC may be a hardcore Flower or Magic101 or WolfQuest gamer. Let's keep in mind that many of the mannerisms you're talking about focus largely on FPS and similar conflict-based online gaming but that other rare forms of online gaming also exist that don't foster that kind of language. That said, they are certainly not a seasoned online game…
/r/MensRights12/07/14 07:28 AM
0

While I can concur about 50% being BS, Chris merely said that women play them, not that they play them in large numbers. Also why does CastleVille lag so damn much and why did Yvette suddenly have Romeo's baby when they were only dating? It skipped intermediary quests damnit.
/r/MensRights12/07/14 07:25 AM
1

he's specifically pointing out that Anita actually had to film the footage of someone messing with the strippers body herself, because no-one actually does it. We can't prove nobody does it, just that thunderf00t is testifying he looked and on playthrough videos he came across he did not find footage of it, and is pointing out you lose points. Inevitably SOMEONE is going to do it though. Not all players go for points (sometimes you do stupid shit in games for fun even if it loses you points) and…
/r/MensRights12/07/14 07:23 AM
-6

If you play in Ruthless Bastard of Pure Evil mode, you can mow down women left and right as part of shooting up a town and racking up the infamy, and you can rob women, but you can't do anything to them you can't do to guys, and nothing sexual at all. That last part is a disappointing lack of realism.
/r/MensRights12/07/14 07:21 AM
6

Sarkeesian logic: all females should be invulnerable and unkillable in every game or else they are temptation for misogynists to engage in killing fantasies about. Alternative approach: if you aim your gun at a female, it automatically causes gun to explode, killing you and any nearby men, but missing all women.
/r/MensRights12/07/14 07:20 AM
1

It seems reasonable that she was directly responsible (in one form or another) for killing the strippers and dragging their bodies around so she could be outraged at what she had just manufactured. This would require her to actually play the games though... something I did not get the impression she had ever actually done... This would be surprising and even if she misrepresents playstyles (trying to argue 'people play this way' is a good opportunity to use others' videos or at least link to the…
/r/MensRights12/07/14 07:19 AM
1

It's still technically being asked out, just in an excessively persistent fashion. Plus you have ignored that it still isn't making someone an object, it's making them a TARGET.
/r/MensRights12/07/14 07:07 AM
1

I don't see how the sentence was stupid... While you're right about men being more likely to be beaten overall, I'm pretty sure cross-dressing men are even more likely to be. Also I'm not sure who you're saying is making an analogy...I thought I was paraphrasing.
/r/MensRights12/07/14 07:05 AM
1

Pushing players is illegal so not part of the game.
/r/MensRights12/07/14 07:01 AM
1

Punishment should be based on cause not outcome. You don't get punished for injuring someone by accident, for example.
/r/MensRights12/07/14 07:01 AM
2

They were in an intermission Karissa, it wasn't part of the game.
/r/MensRights06/07/14 08:19 AM
1

This isn't about fragility Karissa, pushing is often part of football, it's less often part of basketball and certainly wasn't here since the push wasn't done accidentally in the course of seeking the ball.
/r/MensRights06/07/14 08:03 AM
2

It excuses it to me, valid self defense.
/r/MensRights06/07/14 08:02 AM
2

I'm initially inclined to agree but... if the guy stood still and brace himself, it would be harder to knock him down. If she sucker-shoved him when he wasn't looking, it'd be easy to knock him down. He could've been in the middle of jogging across the court or something like that, when you're in the middle of locomotion your balance is kind precarious, so you can stumble more easily at slighter upsets to it.
/r/MensRights06/07/14 08:01 AM
2

The distinction between fists and hands confuses me.
/r/MensRights06/07/14 07:59 AM
1

I think this boy was in danger of dying, she attacked him and tried to break his head on the damn ground.
/r/MensRights06/07/14 07:58 AM
2

OP's article refers to the police report saying he used his feet to assault her. We agree it's ambiguous Could easily refer to him tripping her so she doesn't push him down again. Why people jump to thinking it's some kind of Ortonesque soccer punt I don't know.
/r/MensRights06/07/14 07:55 AM
2

Police involvement isn't what we're complaining about, strawmanner. We're complaining about the unequal punishment. If anyone is getting punished for a longer period it should be her, for starting it.
/r/MensRights06/07/14 07:54 AM
2

The only thing attacked with lethal force was his pride. Think about that. What a crock. Being shoved to the ground is a potentially lethal act, you can split your skull if you're not prepared to take a fall. Stop minimizing her aggression. A punch is far less dangerous.
/r/MensRights06/07/14 07:54 AM
1

he continued fight beyond defense. According the comments he hit her while she was on ground. Comments aren't proof, and people can still be threats on the ground.
/r/MensRights06/07/14 07:52 AM
1

Heck, this is only using average male statistics too. Doesn't even take into account that non-consenting fathers probably make up a BIGGER percentage of workplace deaths since they'd be suffering more emotional upsetness, working more overtime, being more sleep-deprived, etc.
/r/MensRights06/07/14 06:51 AM
1

I can only try to imagine... I think if this ever happened to me I'd just shut down, withdraw, not contribute in any way, let myself go to debtor's prison, try to live monklike in solitary confinement.
/r/MensRights06/07/14 06:50 AM
1

I think a lot of us might take the approach that it's justifiable to force women to gestate fetuses UNTIL they give overwhelming support to our right to not monetarily support children we didn't consent to father. If they're going to fuck us over, maybe fuck them over until they co-operate and show some damn morality.
/r/MensRights06/07/14 06:44 AM
4

The guy walks around like he has nothing to do and eventually encounters a crazy. Guys dressed as guys encounter crazies too. It isn't exclusive to women.
/r/MensRights06/07/14 06:38 AM
-2

Being asked out isn't being 'made into an object' you tool.
/r/MensRights06/07/14 06:37 AM
3

"the fear a man feels about being a victim of street violence from hostility towards crossdressers is how women feel every day" They should fuck off.
/r/MensRights06/07/14 06:36 AM
1

You're making me think of Jay and Manny's dad from Modern Family now.
/r/MensRights06/07/14 06:27 AM
2

I think it's your business as someone concerned for her safety, but I don't see directly confronting the person as a good solution for anything. If you're concerned about who your ex is dating, perhaps hire a private detective, and if you collect evidence that he is a risk factor, then you have evidence that your ex is putting your daughter around risks. Something like that could be used to get custody away from her if you want to dispute and get more time with her.
/r/MensRights06/07/14 06:26 AM
-1

Most people are decent Source?
/r/MensRights06/07/14 06:25 AM
5

I'm his father, the other person is just the guy fucking his mom. That's all he will ever be. That's not necessarily true, people often go beyond 'guy fucking the mom' to a friend and guardian.
/r/MensRights06/07/14 06:24 AM
1

I do not oppose the ability for women to test the gender of their embryos and abort males if they do not want to produce males. If women do not want sons and men want them, there will be men willing to compensate women to bear them sons. But I do not like the idea of women doing this while they retain the ability to steal men's money via child support to support children men do not want. The idea of women being able to abort at all, to avoid becoming a parent to a child they do not desire, while…
/r/MensRights06/07/14 06:21 AM
12

This just makes it into a game of 'who accuses first'. If this is passed, men should immediately report all women for rape in a show of solidarity.
/r/MensRights06/07/14 06:18 AM
1

I didn't say it worked, just that people can be in favour of it. Plying a failed strategy is not insanity, merely incompetence. Plus it does work sometimes.
/r/MensRights28/06/14 05:29 AM
-1

I disagree, one can be aware of one's knighting tendencies and simply be brutally in favour of them as a mating strategy.
/r/MensRights27/06/14 05:27 PM
5

Found an interesting article linked from that thread: http://barreloforanges.com/2013/03/06/circumcision-is-a-feminist-cause A reply by Dwayne Litzenberger stood out to me, pretty well composed: If you want to teach a boy that consent is important, don’t start by giving him a permanent reminder that his wasn’t. Gives me chills, good observation.
/r/MensRights27/06/14 05:27 PM
2

Every single one of us at Posthuman Studios stands in support of feminism's basic principle: treating women as people Shoot, they must have been put off by our "women are not people" motto. Should we erase that from the subreddit banner? please fire yourself as an Eclipse Phase fan. We don't want you. We want our forums to be open and inclusive lolwut bunch of hypocrites, never going to buy any of their shit
/r/MensRights27/06/14 04:17 PM
1

So you think initially a male minor would report something to the police as rape and later not as rape? I dunno why but I figured it might be the opposite.
/r/MensRights24/06/14 07:00 AM
1

I just speak, and damn, my voice brings all the boys to my side. As much as bored drawn voices have begun to grow on me (you can thank Rachel Roth for that somewhat, who I believe got her animated speaking role prior to Karen's vids) it's probably moreso Karen's words than her mannerisms that draw it in... Although the toni-ness adopted by feminists could possibly push one away...
/r/MensRights12/06/14 09:52 PM
-3

I did not say you don't care about getting to know people you socialize with. Just that, no matter how much we think we know others, the possibility exists of them holding interests they do not wish to discuss with us. You sound very confident.
/r/MensRights30/05/14 10:44 PM
0

That or it was deleted, or edited by the poster later to retract that statement. Also I don't think the article specifies that it was said on this subreddit specifically, though I don't know where else it might've been seen.
/r/MensRights30/05/14 10:37 PM
0

he does imply that a crime took place, yes- but he does so in the midst of making a good case for civil rights, wrongful accusations (which take the form of either false accusation w/ no crime or a crime with the wrong person accused), etc. We can remove the babies and still empty the bathwater. Is his choice of language perfect? No. But it's a hell of an improvement- and I'll take it... hence glass half full. I'm not rejecting his improvements, just pointing out he can improve further. You seem…
/r/MensRights30/05/14 10:37 PM
-1

What I do have a problem with is the apparently huge group of people who somehow believe using a gendered insult is an insult to the entire gender It's sort of like saying kike/nigger/spic. Sure, you might only mean members of the ethnicity with particular attributes, but it still comes off rather bigoted. If what we criticize is a problem with those outside of the group to which an insult is tailored to apply then we can find a more neutral way of expressing it without gendering (or racially ch…
/r/MensRights30/05/14 10:32 PM
-1

I'm not following how this means we ought to declare people disinterested in the issue.
/r/MensRights30/05/14 10:30 PM
2

I'm reaching to think of how she could be innocent of this. Even if she was actually raped and had a case of mistaken identity, she opted to blab this to a bunch of drunk violent people instead of the police, so I find her guilty.
/r/MensRights30/05/14 10:29 PM
2

That too. Either way, shouldn't be writing for Time.
/r/MensRights30/05/14 10:28 PM
-2

Arguing a straw man, knowing things about people you spend time with isn't the same as knowing everything about them, including their disinterest. People do not always express all their interests to their friends.
/r/MensRights30/05/14 10:26 PM
1

What post are you replying to? Even if it was, anti-homosexual does not equate to 'homophobic' because you can be against something without fearing it. Furthermore, the stance that same-sex couples should not raise a child alone is not the same as being anti-homosexual. A same-sex couple might be bisexual, for example. Or, it would be possible for a pair of gay men and a pair of lesbians to raise kids collectively in the same house, in which case there should not be any cause for objection becau…
/r/MensRights30/05/14 10:24 PM
1

Okay, well the distinction here is, even if he disagrees with you, if he was saying things he knew to be stupid, he was not honestly communicating his actual beliefs, and instead was trolling with a parody of them.
/r/MensRights30/05/14 10:22 PM
1

The man should be compensated for his troubles but I don't think he should just get a degree, he should still have to complete the required coursework. I would say that the university should fully refund all money paid to them and in addition to this, also pay him a stipend so that he can attend a different university and pursue the rest of the courses required for his degree there. Plus some added money for his time and trouble.
/r/MensRights30/05/14 06:04 AM
8

Toni Maree Miller, 23 Kristofer Lee Jones, 24 Hayden Ranson, 28 Matthew John McKinney, 29 Tariana Jones, 34 Let's remember these folks. The two defendants with the surname Jones were not related to Glen Jones, or to each other. huh... He said the woman who made the rape complaint against Jones bore no responsibility for what they did. She had asked them to leave it to the police and did not encourage them. I don't agree with this. If she lied, she does bear responsibility. Telling someone not to…
/r/MensRights30/05/14 06:02 AM
1

Rocko worked for a phone sex hotline.
/r/MensRights30/05/14 05:58 AM
0

I can't understand how anyone could be friends with a radical feminist like this. A lot of us have a lot of flexibility with friendships. We might be lonely and find others around us even more intolerable. As many problems as feminists have, they could still sometimes be a better choice of companion based on other traits. Like for example, if a feminist liked to play video games, I could probably tolerate her crazy views and avoid arguments if it meant some company. So ronery.
/r/MensRights30/05/14 05:57 AM
9

Don't you know that men disagreeing with women about something is a trigger for rape trauma? Out of sensitivity we are obligated to agree with everything women say. Otherwise they might think we're trying to rape them.
/r/MensRights30/05/14 05:55 AM
0

Apparently her fear is the only valid fear that is real and countable?
/r/MensRights30/05/14 05:54 AM
-1

Believing a child should have a parent of both genders does not mean you are afraid of homosexuals, please use a broader insult.
/r/MensRights30/05/14 05:53 AM
1

the pattern is still noticable This being 'whatever women want'
/r/MensRights30/05/14 05:51 AM
6

SKATING RINK BLACKS PERMITTED
/r/MensRights30/05/14 05:50 AM
16

OP why the fuck did you add that apostrophe to make it seem like only 1 dad when it is clearly plural in the picture?
/r/MensRights30/05/14 05:49 AM
2

Men seem to dominate both the good and bad keyword being 'seem' because that's how the media depicts it.
/r/MensRights30/05/14 05:49 AM
2

Don't you know that 1% of rape committed by men is actually committed by women? Perhaps this is a reference to FtMs?
/r/MensRights30/05/14 05:48 AM
2

Gotta love that good ol reliable stalkers estimate. It couldn't have anything to do that men are ashamed to report stalkers and that their concerns might be ignored. "% or aggravated assaults" strong proofreading on chart
/r/MensRights30/05/14 05:47 AM
16

General complaints that are paraphrased use single quotes, double quotes are for actual things said, so he is still implying someone actually said this.
/r/MensRights30/05/14 05:46 AM
0

and you are qualified to declare others having disinterest in MR?
/r/MensRights30/05/14 05:45 AM
34

I think that would depend on the context, I don't think it would if it was very clear that a woman was a rude person ("bitch" seems to slide in those instances even if I still dislike it) and it was simultaneously clear that she got a promotion for gendered reasons.
/r/MensRights30/05/14 05:45 AM
45

To be fair, not all things said on the internet show up in google searches, so an opportunity should be extended to James Fell to supply evidence of such a comment existing at a date prior to his article. Presumably a good reporter would take evidence, like screenshots of comments and stuff, to back up their reporting if questioned, right?
/r/MensRights30/05/14 05:44 AM
1

My point is that if they can have policies they did not write down, so can feminism.
/r/MensRights30/05/14 05:32 AM
0

in police and legal procedure, it doesn't necessarily mean the claim is accurate. If that is the case, they are abusing the term and should not use it. That it is allowed is irrelevant to the morality of its usage. Think of it this way- victim is shorthand for claimant-victim Unacceptable short-form, I reject it. Use "C-Vic" or something. Even shorter, and more accurate, doesn't imply a potential falsehood. Just because someone's listed as suspect, doesn't mean they did it. That's because "suspe…
/r/MensRights30/05/14 05:31 AM
1

I think that depends on how far locked in it is.
/r/MensRights30/05/14 05:27 AM
0

sane people would immediately dismiss the notion What notion, that something small could snowball into genocide? Do you think they all start at full speed or something? to see the former becoming the later denotes such a warped view that it's either deliberately asinine behavior or sheer stupidity and ignorance (towards either what is going on or what genocides consist of). We're not discussing what genocide consists of, but rather, what precedes them. I'm refusing to acknowledge "male genocide"…
/r/MensRights30/05/14 05:22 AM
1

Any cliff's notes on that exchange?
/r/MensRights30/05/14 05:15 AM
1

To even insinuate that what is slowly happening to men is leading to a genocide is not only a perverse and warped view Why would it be perverse or warped to explore the possibility? I just think it would be inaccurate to speak of it as if it were certain. downright asinine and ignorant seems more like ignoring the possibility of gradual genocide is ignorant
/r/MensRights27/05/14 06:14 AM
1

Accolades are not being demanded for inaction, simply a lack of scorn or shaming. Since when is it a person's duty to play vigilante whenever a friend says something bad was done to them?
/r/MensRights27/05/14 06:13 AM
1

I dunno... surely more than radfems wear them.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 06:12 AM
1

If you say something you know is stupid then you can't actually believe in that stupid thing because if you knew it was stupid you would not believe it.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 06:11 AM
1

the "I wanted him to be all alpha-male and take me like in the last romance novel I read so I said no midway but he stopped like I asked." type There was a webcomic I read once which had a page image that exemplified this trope but I haven't been able to find it for years... the search continues.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 06:10 AM
1

Yes, but I have a very flexible definition of 'care'.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 06:05 AM
1

no it doesn't, if the woman gets tricked she can have an abortion
/r/MensRights27/05/14 06:04 AM
1

Consent to sex is not consent to procreation. Otherwise that would be grounds to outlaw abortion because women who consent to be fucked would be consenting to have babies.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 06:03 AM
1

To even compare X to Y is not only a perverse and warped view, but it's downright asinine and ignorant. That's fucking idiotic thorson, it's not "perverse" or "warped" to compare ANYTHING. It's what you declare to be similar and different in the process of comparison that matters.
/r/MensRights23/05/14 08:38 AM
0

You appear to be overlooking the middle ground 'I changed my mind and didn't want to fuck him and he held me down' kind.
/r/MensRights23/05/14 08:36 AM
1

What's wrong with sounding bitter?
/r/MensRights23/05/14 08:24 AM
2

"teach her not to have babies men don't want"
/r/MensRights23/05/14 08:24 AM
1

there has been black leaders asking their community stop killing their brothers (other black people). That pisses me off. So it's okay to kill sisters, or white people?
/r/MensRights23/05/14 08:23 AM
1

If only women policed each other for sperm this way.
/r/MensRights23/05/14 08:22 AM
1

Can we set up a contrast advertisement with a young girl wearing a 'waiting instructions' shirt saying 'teach your daughter to respect men' ?
/r/MensRights23/05/14 08:21 AM
2

That's like keeping someone for only being attractive. In that you can summarize the virtue in 1 word? 'cause there's kind of a major difference for wanting to stay with someone for being good-lookin' versus good-thinkin'
/r/MensRights23/05/14 07:47 AM
1

That weakness may be in a specific context though. You could have 1 guy who can do a 200lb overhead press and another guy who can do a 500lb squat, and each not be able to replicate the other's feat
/r/MensRights23/05/14 07:47 AM
2

I would lecture her on her species-ism. Humanist makes it sound like humans are all you advocate for, or at least who you focus on, much like feminists. What about hypothetical aliens and sentient robots of the future? Something like 'sentientist' would be superior.
/r/MensRights23/05/14 07:45 AM
1

If you get a 'I'm a bird, don't cage me' for correcting her spelling, dump immediately.
/r/MensRights23/05/14 07:44 AM
1

all it takes is one woman simply saying a man raped her and that can ruin the rest of his life I'm not saying rape is ok Interesting how even women know that such a disclaimer seems necessary because of predicting the inevitable 'you support rape (culture)' accusations
/r/MensRights23/05/14 07:43 AM
0

you hit the jackpot. Wife up. making me remember Peter and MJ, sucks post-BND
/r/MensRights23/05/14 07:42 AM
1

They are just in fear? All of them? Come on... Where do you get 'all of them'? I said 'often' not 'always'. Nice strawman.
/r/MensRights23/05/14 07:40 AM
1

Why did you pick Jews? They're an example of a favoured group who people are criticized merely for criticizing. A terrible example since they are a unique case where a group gets special treatment where people tip toe around because of the holocaust Hardly a unique case. Black people get special treatment because people tiptoe around slavery and segregated bus/bathroom stuff. Women get special treatment because people tiptoe around how they used to lack suffrage. Feminism is not like Judaism or …
/r/MensRights23/05/14 07:39 AM
1

I thought I read something about photos of the wall being passed around and that being the source of it. Either way, an anonymous tip holds no more weight than wall-scrawl without evidence.
/r/MensRights23/05/14 07:37 AM
1

it's fair to describe someone that really believes they are right to be a troll Then you don't understand what troll means. I've encountered many of them You encountering people you think are trolls and calling them trolls doesn't make them trolls.
/r/MensRights23/05/14 07:25 AM
1

That seems a bit presumptuous, radfems not being the only form of troll, and explanations besides trollery existing to explain their behaviour. I don't see why we have to ban arguers pathetic enough to result to faggot-calling. Surely we have a smart response to it. If it continues, over time we are provided with opportunities to come up with new counter-quips.
/r/MensRights23/05/14 07:25 AM
3

Really? So everything listed on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:List_of_controversial_issues is being portrayed as "bad" by Wikipedia?
/r/MensRights23/05/14 07:20 AM
1

Did I say what you put in quotes? It sounds like you are addressing a poster besides myself.
/r/MensRights23/05/14 07:19 AM
3

But wearing clothing isn't a written statement, so was it their policy?
/r/MensRights23/05/14 07:18 AM
4

oodles more time talking about that gap than actually trying to address issues related to dangerous male workplaces. There are already groups that do things like this. Unions being an example. Or WMIS training/protocols. I don't think countering feminist propaganda necessarily means that refuting them is our main point though. Feminism is hardly the sole source of misandry, male obligation or female privilege. Although a major one which could warrant 'main' at times, it seems.
/r/MensRights23/05/14 06:52 AM
1

Implying that MRA's want to bring women down instead of raise men up is absolutely ludicrous. Apostrophe abuse bro.
/r/MensRights23/05/14 06:49 AM
2

Would be helpful if instead of just linking the post if OP (deleted) explained why they view beanfiddler as a feminist and specified which of the dozen points she made was making the claim to save us time... although luckily here it appears to be the first... Not fair that it's more socially-acceptable to hit men? Beat women. In BF's defense though, they are not saying it means you WANT to beat women, just that it is being advocated as solution... which sounds like a straw man to me, of course
/r/MensRights23/05/14 06:47 AM
2

Would 'market forces' be considered a valid reason to exclude black men? Also... this is kind of a self-correcting problem. The ratio sucking means more men (spenders) are already present. If men leave or avoid coming due to a sucky ratio, suddenly you have a good ratio, and they come back.
/r/MensRights23/05/14 06:40 AM
1

Probably... but you never know, she might be a rare flower who is also interrogating women carrying women and men carrying men.
/r/MensRights23/05/14 06:38 AM
2

most of the violent crimes are committed by males You can't prove this. Men being convicted of more violent crimes than women doesn't mean that men commit more of them, it only means that more men are convicted. More people being convicted may mean that they are committing more and being treated equally, or that they are committing equal (or less) and being prosecuted more often.
/r/MensRights23/05/14 06:37 AM
2

Sir, that is just close-minded. She could be a heterosexual-preferring bisexual woman who simply opted to commit lesbian rape due to circumstantial opportuneness.
/r/MensRights23/05/14 06:35 AM
2

No, he should not, he could go to jail for that. Also no, furries do not ruin EVERYthing.
/r/MensRights23/05/14 06:24 AM
1

If we naively assume such good intentions of women, then why not assume any male stranger also has altruistic intent?
/r/MensRights23/05/14 06:24 AM
1

I'd say we should boycott any newspaper that deletes comments, but it's kinda hypocritical since comments also get deleted on this subreddit. A good middle compromise might be if admins had the power to hide comments they judged bad but that people could click on hidden comments to view them (and re-hide them, if they concurred with the hide-judgment)
/r/MensRights23/05/14 06:22 AM
1

Are you saying a she couldn't give consent to go home because she was drunk? Well... if being drunk means you can't give consent to a man to enter your vagina, then shouldn't it also mean you can't give a consent to a man to enter your front door?
/r/MensRights23/05/14 06:21 AM
2

I am not a weird rapey-pedophile To be fair, they might just be concerned that you are the more common non-rapey variety.
/r/MensRights23/05/14 06:20 AM
1

That's rather... shadowy.
/r/MensRights23/05/14 06:19 AM
1

I do not believe this 100%... but I majority suspect it.
/r/MensRights23/05/14 06:18 AM
1

Do you imply that treating someone as a suspect is uncivil?
/r/MensRights23/05/14 06:18 AM
1

I think the interaction should take longer than this. Hearing the drunk person themselves say they are okay should generally be when it ends... It's not utterly misandric to question a man carrying around a blackout-drunk woman, for example... But on the flip side... do we apply this equally? If a man is carrying around a drunk man, do we question him? Do we question women carrying around women? Women carrying around men? If we save our "sober person ambulancing a drunk" criticism solely for men…
/r/MensRights23/05/14 06:17 AM
1

That depends on whether the story OP has the capability of doing that. We can't always overpower guys like this, nor do we have a duty to.
/r/MensRights23/05/14 06:14 AM
1

Perhaps in case the guy she was cheating with took a video of it and the boyfriend found the video of the sex.
/r/MensRights23/05/14 06:12 AM
2

or cut her hair off so your hands are free to get her replacement spew-cans. she might be mad about this though
/r/MensRights23/05/14 06:11 AM
1

Written consent can be invalidated if you convince a jury you signed it under duress... so it still comes down to 'shesaid' and men being presumed guilty until proven innocent..
/r/MensRights23/05/14 06:11 AM
0

Isn't this also what happened to Eddie Guerrero?
/r/MensRights23/05/14 06:09 AM
2

Not that it justifies people assaulting you without hearing your story first... but I think it might've been a good idea for the bartender to announce to any woman already in the washrooms (sticking his head in to shout 'this lady's friend is helping her up and taking her home!) or any who entered after you, since it might've prevented this.
/r/MensRights23/05/14 06:08 AM
2

I wonder if an unconscious man's penis is inside a woman as she rape-rides him, if he is still showing hate for her as he struggles to wake up and figure out what is going on.
/r/MensRights23/05/14 06:05 AM
3

Do you believe that policies need to be written down and openly expressed by an organization or movement for it to count? Do they have to openly support that view in an official stance for it to be valid or associated with them? In which case... did the KKK openly take responsibility for mobs illegally hanging negroes?
/r/MensRights23/05/14 06:05 AM
4

FSA, as I don't make a habit of monitoring the entirety of posts on a particular reddit, can you think of a way for someone to easily test your claim of 'only' calling bullshit on 1 story? It's difficult to find evidence of negatives like this. Plus 'moment' is kind of a vague time period. Can you make a claim like "this is the only thing we've called BS in the last week/month/year" or something?
/r/MensRights23/05/14 06:02 AM
7

Perhaps we could find middle ground and find "I hate people who wear I <3 misandry" shirts?
/r/MensRights23/05/14 06:00 AM
0

This makes me feel bad about spitting on my aunt when I was a tween... but to be fair, she kept telling me and my friend this annoying story about how she used to spit when doing karate battle cries when she obviously knew nothing about martial arts and I was just trying to game or watch cartoons or something.
/r/MensRights23/05/14 05:59 AM
2

Having only watched the first 4 episodes of the series I'm going to tiptoe around these threads... guess I better grab the DVDs
/r/MensRights23/05/14 05:57 AM
1

Does CAFE call itself a "men's issues" group or is that a label from other groups?
/r/MensRights23/05/14 05:56 AM
3

Fuck no, don't remove the section. "controversial" does not mean "bad". MR being there is fine. Don't be a fucking vandal Citation needed flags are fine if they're warranted but that section is actually very well referenced, so I don't see a need for them. If you believe SRS is noteworthy then work on finding references to build a case for it, don't mess with other people's work.
/r/MensRights23/05/14 05:53 AM
1

It's all about sources man. Wikipedia is not about what we personally might find controversial, but rather, what "reliable sources" call controversial. I'm not sure what those actually are though, but basically, find sources, use them to justify the allegation of controversy, and then argue about validity.
/r/MensRights23/05/14 05:53 AM
5

Man: "can I put it in?" Woman: "sure, if you can last 10 minutes" man cums in 9 Woman: "raaaape" The language in this report is fucked up though. We ought to send Stephen Neyman, P.C. some nasty letters. Look at this shit... Why Would a Victim in a Rape Case Lie? He uses "victim" but that term is only appropriate when rape actually occurs, which is not settled. While actual victims of rape can still lie (for example, if Sideshow Mel raped Marge Simpson, she could lie and say Sideshow Bob raped h…
/r/MensRights23/05/14 05:48 AM
2

For some reason this made me picture grabbing a kicking woman by the foot and putting her into a 1-legged boston grab (walls of Jericho) Would this leave injuries on her that could be mistinterpreted as DV instead of self-defense? I figure it might actually help since a lot of people have tight hip flexors.
/r/MensRights23/05/14 05:45 AM
2

Not to mention photos probably would not stop a lot of them, since they also accuse committed boyfriends of intent to rape.
/r/MensRights23/05/14 05:44 AM
0

talking to these people doesn't really seem to work either Still seems like a better idea than hitting her.
/r/MensRights23/05/14 05:43 AM
2

Well, a nice sub for bitch that's gender-neutral would be nice. What would we say to a white knight male in this circumstance?
/r/MensRights23/05/14 05:42 AM
5

It would not be as bad if this were a man, because a 13 year old girl who became pregnant by sex with a man could have an abortion or give the kid up for adoption. She could not be obligated to pay child support like this boy will be.
/r/MensRights23/05/14 05:41 AM
1

Y'know, if we simply allowed the Manhood Academy guys to post and argue here, that would give them less time to flood other articles. The way we avoid arguing with them smacks of how feminists avoid arguing with us.
/r/MensRights16/05/14 09:26 AM
1

She believes feminism is a good thing and thinks that the feminists you dislike are not true feminists. We get that impression, and we disagree with her. The ones she and we dislike are still feminists, and probably more of a feminist than she is since her interesting in advancing the female cause terminates at equality and theirs does not.
/r/MensRights16/05/14 09:23 AM
1

I feel like we're just arguing about our subjective meanings of the word. Our meanings are not subjective, we directly analyze the etymology of the term, which is sexist in nature (it indicates female). It is your opinion, reliant upon dictionaries influenced by feminist propoganda and scared scholars, which is biased by subjectivity. Think for yourself if you aspire to be a hero. Feminism is only concerned with women being equal No, it isn't. The word is not constructed to convey that meaning. …
/r/MensRights16/05/14 09:21 AM
2

The dictionary definition is the definition, pure and simple I was not aware there was only one dictionary. Did you burn the rest, hero?
/r/MensRights16/05/14 09:19 AM
1

I don't think anyone's so stupid as to think the dictionary definition is true Your optimism is misplaced David, a lot of people slave their thinking to those things. You can usually spot them if you're not already discussing a particular dictionary and someone chimes in with "THE dictionary says". The definite article is the calling card of the moron. case in point
/r/MensRights16/05/14 09:17 AM
0

If people dont identify as feminists and they know feminism doesnt equal equality why is it considered so socially unacceptable to criticise feminism and feminists? Allow me to answer your question with a question. If people do not identify as Jewish, and they do not agree that Judaism is an accurate assessment of reality, why is it considered socially unacceptable to criticize Judaism and Jews? I can answer this if you want to, do you need me to?
/r/MensRights16/05/14 09:16 AM
1

If only 20% are feminists then we wouldn't see such support Why not? People often "support" out of fear or misunderstanding. They know feminism will roast them if they disagree so they step aside. That doesn't make you a feminist.
/r/MensRights16/05/14 09:12 AM
2

you have to understand that the world still sees the word feminism as a synonym for "equality" Please don't lecture us on what we "have to" understand as if we are ignorant of feminism's fraudulent definition being circulated, it's kinda demeaning.
/r/MensRights16/05/14 09:11 AM
2

Didn't Warren Farrell also suffer from this issue for a while? Or does he still?
/r/MensRights16/05/14 09:10 AM
1

There's no reason to crucify her for labeling herself as a feminist in addition to being a humanist. Sure there is, feminism is contrary to humanism since it ignores the humanity of men. Feminism has accomplished some awesome things in the world. No, feminism has taken credit for many awesome accomplishments. Feel free to offer particulars and how feminism exclusively should be credited for them though.
/r/MensRights16/05/14 09:08 AM
3

Even those who spell 'pedant' and its derivities properly are usually fucking morons when they use it as an insult. So to anyone who accuses others of 'sophistry' or 'hubris'. Any other words like that ring an idiot bell for people?
/r/MensRights16/05/14 09:07 AM
3

Thirded, great analysis
/r/MensRights16/05/14 09:05 AM
4

We can still find humor in tragedy. If anonymous gets ahold of this, I will laugh at her misfortune.
/r/MensRights16/05/14 08:45 AM
1

Ah, but how many female reporters will be asked for resignations over their name being put on a wall?
/r/MensRights16/05/14 08:44 AM
4

That's a load of shit. Inaction is not endorsement, I hate that stance. Though I agree it would be nice if they hijacked it.
/r/MensRights16/05/14 08:44 AM
2

I can't prove it's the simplest, most immediate and most effective... but I can't think of anything simpler or more effective.
/r/MensRights16/05/14 08:43 AM
1

Explaining how that information is unreliable is far more effective than trying to illustrate it by replicating the wrong. No, it isn't, considering that illustration through replication is an explanatory technique. Some people are too fucking dumb to understand explanations, they need examples of bullshit to realize how bullshit works.
/r/MensRights16/05/14 08:43 AM
1

RCL where should I look to confirm this story? I looked at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Denmark_in_World_War_II but all I could find on this matter was... King Christian X remained in Denmark throughout the war, a symbol of courage much appreciated by his subjects, though the story claiming that he would wear the Star of David if Jews were forced to do so is apocryphal. So, not to be rude, but calling some fucking bullshit here.
/r/MensRights16/05/14 08:41 AM
3

I personally believe that for every false accusation, there are ten real sexual assaults that do not result in a conviction. Based on what, exactly? If I came back at you with "for every actual rape of a woman by a man, there are ten false accusations of a man raping a woman that do not result in a conviction" how would you respond? Is there any evidence to support your view over mine? My logic is: it's easier to talk than to rape, and men are more wired to protect women than women are to protec…
/r/MensRights16/05/14 08:39 AM
5

assuming that it's limited to just an anonymous bathroom scrawl is unjustifiably sloppy Not really, we're going with what we're told. Why should we assume there was evidence if none is presented to us?
/r/MensRights16/05/14 08:37 AM
-1

I have it on good authority all of them raped a million cakes.
/r/MensRights16/05/14 08:36 AM
2

"10 kids" could have a significant amount of readers and impact though. Their reputation should be tarnished for acts like this, however little it might be.
/r/MensRights16/05/14 08:36 AM
1

Yo Pierce Found http://articles.latimes.com/1985-04-08/local/me-18595_1_prior-sexual-activity for your Dershowitz quote. Would be a good policy to link a source when quoting people in case some don't believe you.
/r/MensRights16/05/14 08:34 AM
2

I had to take a second glance at http://www.splcenter.org/get-informed/intelligence-report/browse-all-issues/2012/spring/misogyny-the-sites to notice your blog there. They say "Community of the Wrongly Accused" is a subtitle but it looks more like the main title. I don't remember seeing "False Rape Society", was that a former title that was removed or something?
/r/MensRights16/05/14 07:13 AM
1

We should reject that new meaning and stick to our roots. Trolling is when you engage in deception to make others react negatively (like sad, but usually angry) to that deception.
/r/MensRights16/05/14 07:09 AM
1

Trolling is being heavily misused... not really unique, many words are being misused by idiots who use words to seem hip or smart without first learning what they mean.
/r/MensRights16/05/14 07:08 AM
1

"Trolling" can be anything designed to get a "negative reaction" Eh... no, gotta disagree with you there. I believe subterfuge, misleading, must be involved, for it to be trolling. Otherwise I'd be "trolling" a guy if I went up to him on the street and punched him in the mouth. trolling MUST require deception
/r/MensRights16/05/14 07:06 AM
1

Clearly you exaggerate. Someone need not have "no knowledge" of fishing to not know the terms for different kinds. Someone who has fished casually even once in their life knows SOMETHING about fishing, yet wouldn't know this.
/r/MensRights16/05/14 07:04 AM
1

Just as likely? I can't see a 50/50 perfect split being the case. Surely it's at least a 49/51 one way or the other. I can't say which but... I think guys tend to like ladies more than ladies do so.... Im' going to get the 51% bullying to ladies.
/r/MensRights16/05/14 07:03 AM
1

The president enforcing the constitution is not the courts punishing you, you twit. It is an action of the president stemming from his individual duties to protect and uphold the constitution, not from any of the courts individual powers. The president enforcing changes to constitution does not mean the action is not also caused by those who change it. If an assassin snipes a target, the person who hires them and decides on the target is still morally responsible and part of the chain of causes.…
/r/MensRights16/05/14 06:59 AM
1

No, not the same thing. "You have not shown me evidence of flying unicorns" is not the same thing as saying "flying unicorns can't exist"
/r/MensRights16/05/14 06:37 AM
1

I don't have to prove that there are some men who don't care what happens to women they had sex with. You juSt now said that there are men who are messed up enough to masturbate to the thought of that woman having to get an abortion. Are you arguing that a man who masturbates to the thought of women getting abortions could not possibly care what happens to any woman? The man doesn't have to have sex with an egg-carrying object We don't need to for pregnancies to happen. A gay man could get a blo…
/r/MensRights16/05/14 06:36 AM
1

why is it the woman's responsibility to make sure birth control works Abortion is the last resort which women demand exclusive control over. So long as it is their sole thing to control then they should be solely responsible for the results if they avoid that option. Even if women wished to forgo their reproductive agency and allow men to give them abortions at will, this would still be functionally unfair to men because women can hide their pregnancy or not inform someone if birth control faile…
/r/MensRights16/05/14 06:35 AM
1

It's still rape if a women keeps cum in her womb when he didn't consent for her to keep it there. Orgasm is not consent.
/r/MensRights16/05/14 06:32 AM
1

what method is there for expelling it? If you mean sperm, douching. If it's already fertilized, a morning-after pill is nice before the fertilized egg attaches to the wall. If further on, abortion. Nowhere in there did you even allude to it being a subset of women. Which is to say "all women". That was the point, I was showing you how ridiculous it is to make statements without 'some of' disclaimers since some people may read it as all. You had said "I pointed out that it is (at least partially)…
/r/MensRights16/05/14 06:30 AM
1

Statistics. Minorities are growing, the republican base is divided and shrinking and young people are more and more progressive. Statistics can give us general inclinations but they're hardly guarantees. Societies recess or reform around different issues. The courts won't punish you. The president will "uphold and protect" the constitution, as is his duty. I view this as the courts punishment, the president being an enforcer doesn't negate that it's their authority causing the result. You're an …
/r/MensRights14/05/14 10:15 AM
0

you don't "take posession" of sperm during sex If you hold an object in your body that's definitely taking possession of it. It would make child murder partially the fault of women. I don't think I said 'entirely' :) we call that "backpedaling". Your statement meant, quite plainly, it wasn't the fault of men at all. I view women as responsible for their reproductive systems, so of course it's their fault. I would hold men accountable for any pregnancies they carried as well, like Arnold in that …
/r/MensRights14/05/14 10:07 AM
1

Take two groups whose most basic views are diametrically opposed to each other and then see if they can reason with each other. Reasoning is always possible. You don't believe in inherent rights. That's an interesting statement. It tells me a lot about you. If you don't believe in inherent rights you don't believe in rights at all. No... I believe rights exist, I just believe that they are things decided on and invented by people. We philosophize on what is important, what ought to be, and then …
/r/MensRights12/05/14 07:52 AM
1

OK guy, you're technically right. If the united states where overthrown by radical pro lifers where hundreds of thousands of people would be killed in a 5 to 10 year reign of blood like the french revolution, then yea. Abortion could be criminalized. So you're not wrong, you're just an asshole. I'm not sure why I'm an asshole by pointing out the distorted logic in your post. Also it would hardly take overthrowing the US government to change these things. If they dominated society for a long enou…
/r/MensRights12/05/14 07:49 AM
1

common position is that abortion should only be legal I would say 'at least be legal'. "Only" introduces the idea that it is common to abide by such restrictions exclusively.
/r/MensRights11/05/14 09:03 AM
1

By this logic, if a husband fucks his wife thinking she's been faithful (since she promised to be in her vows) and she actually cheated on him with the poolboy, then she could ALSO be charged with rape. Realistically we don't really go that far with interpreting the context of sexual situations though. Otherwise if a husband said he took out the garbage and got a blow-job as thanks, wives would be rape victims if it turned out the garbage wasn't actually taken out.
/r/MensRights11/05/14 09:03 AM
1

There are things called fukin CHECKS AND BALANCES Which discourage change, not prevent it absolutely. The french royalty had checks and balances too, didn't stop them from being overthrown. If the supreme court says something is unconstitutional IT MEANS YOU CANT FUCKING DO IT Incorrect, it simply means that if you do it, the courts will attempt to punish you if they learn of it. Unless you literally amend the constitution of the united states, you CAN NOT CRIMINALIZE ABORTION Incorrect, you cou…
/r/MensRights11/05/14 09:01 AM
0

Chickens are also innocent. You just equated children with chickens. That's an argument fail. I don't think you know what the verb "equate" is. I did not say they were equal. Strawberries are red. Apples are also red. Have I equated these? If you can't acknowledge an innocent human being has a right to life then there is no reasoning with you. Why is there no reasoning with people who do not believe in inherent rights?
/r/MensRights11/05/14 08:59 AM
0

Both parties are responsible for what happens to the sperm I disagree, whoever takes possession of the sperm is responsible with what they do with it. A woman ought nought to ferment it in her womb to make it into a kid without getting permission first. You said that it isn't the fault of men that women get called sluts for being sexually active. I pointed out that it is (at least partially) the fault of men. In that case, child murder is the fault of women, because some women murder children. A…
/r/MensRights11/05/14 08:57 AM
2

Since much of politeness is the tone in which we say things, I think it's more about the manner than the phrase in many cases. I would accept a "I am well provided for through my clopping and do not need assistance".
/r/MensRights11/05/14 08:55 AM
1

Someone utterly not caring is not provable. Men don't have to actually go through the procedure You keep repeating this disclaimer as if I had argued men get abortions or something, please stop =/
/r/MensRights11/05/14 08:54 AM
1

...Why would there be men who think the idea of abortion is a fabulous thing? That's pretty messed up. World is full of messed-up people, inevitably there will be men and women in the world who even fap to it. There ARE men who don't care about what happens to women they have sex with, though. Can you actually prove such an absolute? the man doesn't have to have the procedure What's your point? The woman doesn't have to have sex with a semen-carrying object.
/r/MensRights11/05/14 08:53 AM
1

Do you really think anyone is going to be willing to make that down payment? Under the right context, sure, why not? If there are already caring people in the world who voluntarily help pay for abortions then those same people would put down the deposit. You're saying that women shouldn't ever have sex unless they can find a guy who is willing to do that. False, I'm saying she shouldn't have sex with guys who won't do that if she wants help paying for her abortions. If she's willing to manage he…
/r/MensRights11/05/14 08:52 AM
1

Are you honestly saying that it would be unfair to ask a rapist to give his victims money? No, considering I already said it is completely fair to ask a rapist to give the victim money IF it's for an abortion. why would the rapist owe her money to get an abortion but not to pay for the costs of pregnancy? Pregnancy is not a requirement, abortions are cheaper and better for society than generations of rape babies. It also discourages women from filing false rape claims to get pregnancy support, o…
/r/MensRights11/05/14 08:49 AM
1

I'm not forcing moral views on anyone just pointing out that you're identifying a subjective negative, not an inherent one.
/r/MensRights11/05/14 08:46 AM
1

Arbitrarily making it birth is simple enough. I consider it being generous.
/r/MensRights11/05/14 08:45 AM
1

You can say that about pretty much any argument, and there's no way of testing it, so why bring it up?
/r/MensRights11/05/14 08:45 AM
1

Unrealistic expectations jack. If a man tosses his cum in the trash, he is being violated and raped if it is stolen and used to create a pregnancy. I would say the same of a woman whose egg is stolen from a fertility clinic and used to make a baby with an undesired male.
/r/MensRights11/05/14 08:44 AM
0

Craw, the man is innocent until proven guilty. It is your burden to find evidence that she was raped, that this mn did something wrong. Expecting proof that women weren't raped is kinda silly. Do you have proof the MAN wasn't raped?
/r/MensRights07/05/14 05:40 AM
1

They're touchy about having to apologize to a guy or thank a guy for making a pass at them. I'm wondering if there's some kind of middle ground where we can think of a way for them to say something polite without it pissing them off.
/r/MensRights07/05/14 05:39 AM
0

We both know abortions of children conceived through rape are a tiny fraction of all abortions I don't claim to know anything like this, though I can agree with the likelihood. The child is innocent and should not be put to death for the crime of its father. Chickens are also innocent. This isn't a matter of us thinking a kid should be punished, it's a matter of seeing this inferior lifeform as a useless burden.
/r/MensRights07/05/14 05:37 AM
1

Whether or not giving a lap dance somehow abuses your authority is somewhat dependent on the context. Teachers can do a lot of things in a joking or sociable manner without an eye being blinked, it's usually when things get somewhat erotic that people protest.
/r/MensRights07/05/14 05:36 AM
-1

The pregnancy is the fault of both people, not one or the other. Incorrect, it is the fault of a woman because it is her responsibility to keep her womb clear of debris. Expecting women to manage this tiny area of space is a much more realistic expectation than expecting men to manage our sperm as they circulate throughout the atmosphere. It's at least partially our fault. There are certainly enough men who would label a woman a slut for engaging in sexual activity. That's THOSE men's fault. We …
/r/MensRights07/05/14 05:35 AM
1

Are they? I've never heard of that.
/r/MensRights07/05/14 05:32 AM
1

People won't like the idea of dads being able to opt out of parental obligations whenever they like, so they'll put a time limit on it, and that time limit will fuck over dads who get notified too later. Better to have an opt in system.
/r/MensRights07/05/14 05:32 AM
1

You can criminalize anything. The supreme court ruling in favour of free speech and abortion is great, and makes outlawing both of them incredibly difficult, but no law is immune to change.
/r/MensRights07/05/14 05:31 AM
0

My stance is it's not my decision to make a stance because I'm not female. Fuck that self-depricating feminist garbage. You will be obligated to pay taxes, and those taxes will support the babies produced by the choices of women who will not adequately support them. Since your dollar is being taken from you, damn right it's your say. These children are being introduced into a society you're living in too, and if they get neglected or fucked up and turned into criminals, it's your business.
/r/MensRights06/05/14 08:37 AM
2

Men cannot abort within that time limit if they are not notified of their fatherhood, requiring we abdicate something we never agreed to in the first place is fucking moronic. Instead: how about if women can't provide an adequate downpayment on a kid, then they get arrested and forcibly aborted? If we allow a kid to be produced, someone is gonna have to foot the bill, and if she can't, the burden shifts onto society, so the father (and all other men) end up paying for it anyway.
/r/MensRights06/05/14 08:35 AM
1

killing unborn children is wrong. Why?
/r/MensRights06/05/14 08:33 AM
1

Darkseid and Thanos concur
/r/MensRights06/05/14 08:32 AM
1

I thought it was 'paternal' surrender... Either way, I don't like it. We should not have to surrender an obligation we never agreed to in the first place.
/r/MensRights06/05/14 08:32 AM
1

Chickens have brains. I think we need higher standards than brain.
/r/MensRights06/05/14 08:31 AM
0

The 'pro-choice' idea that a fetus isn't a life is absurd Straw-man arguments tend to be. there's no argument that can say killing a fetus in the womb is somehow morally superior to killing a prematurely born baby Ah, but what if some of us don't really give a shit whether premature babies are killed? I'm kinda apathetic about the value of their life until they start showing signs of personality more complex than my farmed food. to these same people the fetus is not alive Cease the straw-man bul…
/r/MensRights06/05/14 08:31 AM
-1

a person who wouldn't feel welcome would be someone who believed that women are paid 77 cents on the dollar for the exact same work as men. I see killing a fetus as murder, but I don't feel unwelcome because of that I feel unwelcome toward both types, but I consider them to be their own flavour of delusion. shrug
/r/MensRights06/05/14 08:27 AM
1

Rape sure is inconvenient eh?
/r/MensRights06/05/14 08:25 AM
1

she still has to deal with the emotional cost of being pregnant Big fucking deal. If I get drunk and piss my pants and slip in the piss and embarass myself, I also have to deal with 'emotional costs'. In both cases they're costs resulting from behaviour that was consented to (inadequately protected sex, excessive drinking) and the burden of that responsibility is on the chooser of that invading substance. the medical bills Want to engage in acts that can result in pregnancy and not bear the pote…
/r/MensRights06/05/14 08:25 AM
1

It's a generous thing to do, but we should not be obligated to do it, nor shunned or looked down upon if we do not. Women can get pregnant from a man's cum without him having any fault in it, he could take all precautions and she could fish it out of the trash. If women want men to pay, then fucking refuse sex until a man gives money in advance that you can use if it happens. I think under the right circumstances (time limit, DNA test) many men would be happy to make such a deposit.
/r/MensRights06/05/14 08:18 AM
1

This is not in any way unfair to women. You speak of abortions as if getting pregnant is some natural burden of a woman. It isn't. Women are only not at fault for pregnancy if they are raped. Under any other circumstance, they have the agency to control what is put in their bodies and the conditions they attach to that. If birth control fails, it's the woman's fault for consenting to sex with inadequate birth control. If she doesn't like the risk of that, she should get a deposit from a man befo…
/r/MensRights06/05/14 08:16 AM
1

Why does this matter? Some women are of the opinion that the sight of men anywhere offends and traumatizes them, does this mean we did something bad and should be held at fault for her being upset?
/r/MensRights06/05/14 08:14 AM
1

It's fair because the woman controls what goes in her. If she doesn't want to bear the potential cost of abortions then don't put something covered in (or filled with) cum in your twat, essentially. Or do so conditionally only after receiving a deposit which can be used for that purpose as a gift for your suitor. We should romanticize the abortion co-down-payments. Although there should obviously be an expiration date on them. If a guy gives a girl a fee that can be used on an abortion and she d…
/r/MensRights06/05/14 08:13 AM
1

You're not allowed to debate if you need permission. Fuck you for asking. Projection much. Pretty sure it still qualifies as 'being allowed' even if you have to receive permission. Consider the equivalent "you're not allowed to fuck if you need permission". In this case the user doesn't need permission, the rules allow it, but they were unsure of the status of the rules and were asking.
/r/MensRights06/05/14 08:11 AM
1

You can't force a woman to carry a child Actually it would be possible to do that, but we opt not to due to morality squeamishness.
/r/MensRights06/05/14 08:09 AM
2

...Littlest Pet Shop?
/r/MensRights06/05/14 08:07 AM
1

Reproductive rights are basic human rights. Should they be? What about when rights compete? I would say the 'right to food' and the 'right to shelter' would also be basic survival-based rights... probably more essential needs than reproducing.. but does it mean I can steal a man's home and bread if I am not prepared to support myself?
/r/MensRights06/05/14 08:07 AM
1

The issue being debated is not whether or not living cells are being killed, but whether or not those cells constitute "a life" in terms as we consider one worth having rights worth defending, generally that of a sentient. If we consider it on the level of a chicken, whose rights we do not defend in the same way we do mature humans, this is when we debate their rights.
/r/MensRights06/05/14 08:06 AM
1

since it is impossible to factually and scientifically determine exactly when life begins, I believe every individual must do so for themselves and live with the consequences. Following this logic, I could say "life begins at 40" and wipe out mass segments of the population. Community discussion on the issue is warranted.
/r/MensRights06/05/14 08:04 AM
1

I believe he means that abortions shouldn't be considered as a valid contraceptive measure I do not agree that this was necessarily what Bill Clinton meant. Rather I believe it simply means he sees them as a sub-par contraceptive measure (which is true, it wastes resources spent on partially developing a fetus and is usually more taxing on the woman) compared to condoms and other contraceptives. Abortion is not a contra-ceptive, it is a means of birth control, they are not synonyms. Contraceptio…
/r/MensRights06/05/14 08:03 AM
2

I am completely in favor of legal paternal surrender. Men should be able to opt-out. Why should we have to opt out in the first place? This should be an opt-in system. Are women inherently assumed to be wanting cock unless they explicitly opt-out? Why are we different? If sex requires enthusiastic voluntarily consent to be initiated then so should parenthood and its obligations.
/r/MensRights06/05/14 08:01 AM
1

It Is a legal act and states cannot criminalize it. Something being legal does not mean something cannot be later criminalized.
/r/MensRights06/05/14 07:59 AM
-1

I wouldn't feel like I killed a human being if a Falcon Punch'd a woman into a miscarriage, and a logical woman wouldn't feel like she killed a sentient being if she had an abortion. You're talking about a conditional downside held by people who have stupid religious views that would usually prevent them from doing it anyway.
/r/MensRights06/05/14 07:59 AM
1

we can both agree on is that instead of child support he has to help her pay for her pregnancy or abortion, whichever she decides on. Fuck no. That's bullshit. Men should never have to pay anything unless they're proven to have raped a woman. Even in that case, they should only have to pay if an abortion is had. If a woman opts to keep a rape-baby then the rapist should owe her no money.
/r/MensRights06/05/14 07:57 AM
1

If she gets pregnant, she has to pay a price: either pregnancy or abortion. He is equally responsible for that pregnancy, and should help her pay that price. Wrong, getting pregnant is more a woman's fault than a man's. She controls that last mile. Only in cases of rape should men have to pay for an abortion. Otherwise, that's an option for those who care enough to. Women are free to refuse sex unless men make a 'potential abortion fee' downpayment. If women consent to sex without getting the de…
/r/MensRights06/05/14 07:56 AM
1

Implying we lack incentive to avoid pregnancies other than potential child support. While there could plausibly be men who think the idea of women they have sex with getting an abortions is a fabulous thing, there could also be masochistic women who fap while getting abortions. So if we're going to entertain that there are a portion of women who dislike getting an abortion, let's also entertain that there are men who have enough empathy to also dislike that necessity and would avoid impregnation…
/r/MensRights06/05/14 07:54 AM
1

They would be able to get control over the situation by being more careful to use birth control, etc. I know that sounds unfair It sounds unfair because it's bullshit.
/r/MensRights06/05/14 07:52 AM
1

You appear to be implying here that men lack a similar inherent reason. Do you think we just fap to how erotic it would be for women we impregnate to get abortions or give birth or some shit? Some of us find both outcomes rather repulsive responses.
/r/MensRights06/05/14 07:51 AM
0

This doesn't mean a man can force a woman to have an abortion, but that he can opt-out of being a father a suitable amount of time before the baby is born. Even if we thought it right for a man to have the right to induce an abortion, it isn't readily feasible considering how women can simply avoid revealing the paternity. Better to simply give government power to induce abortions for unfit potential parents. Those who are unprepared to be parents, who don't have enough money, should not be allo…
/r/MensRights06/05/14 07:47 AM
1

I am only partially pro-choice. I am pro-choice in the respect that I believe if a woman wants an abortion that she should always be allowed to get one, no matter what. But I am not pro-choice in the respect that I believe women should be able to keep pregnancies simply because they want to. While 'my body, my choice' makes sense to me in regard to that we should not enslave bodies and force them to reproduce at our whim, the statement does not hold if people are opting to produce new members of…
/r/MensRights06/05/14 07:45 AM
1

How does discouraging pornography acting conflict with feminism? Is it wrong for MRAs to tell men not to work in porn?
/r/MensRights06/05/14 07:35 AM
2

The article doesn't even feature him denying the rape charges. Did it feature him affirming them? Since when is something automatically rape unless the accused denies it? Does it occur to people that media may omit communicating denials to the public?
/r/MensRights06/05/14 07:31 AM
2

She has a reason to lie, he doesn't. To be fair, if a rape did occur, a rapist would have a reason to lie. Motive could exist for either party depending on the situation.
/r/MensRights06/05/14 07:31 AM
1

raped her multiple times is OK under Indian law if you marry her afterwards Source?
/r/MensRights06/05/14 07:30 AM
2

"Let's make up for some of our officers raping women by jailing guys who did not actually rape them"
/r/MensRights06/05/14 07:28 AM
3

If a man consents to marry and fuck a woman so long as she promises to be faithful to him, and she cheats on him with another man, is she also jailed for rape? If a man consents to marry and fuck a woman so long as she promises to bear his children, and she refuses to carry any pregnancies to term, is she also jailed for rape?
/r/MensRights06/05/14 07:27 AM
4

They don't have the right! I shouldn't have to chase them away they shouldn't even have the guts to try! I'm pretty sure you can think statement 2 without thinking statements 1 and 3. It is okay for them to want to be able to turn people down without having to 'chase' a suitor off with a male interest.
/r/MensRights06/05/14 07:24 AM
1

I don't get why you have to go so far as girlfriend. Why not "sorry I'm in love with someone else..." and if she pesters you, lament "John Cena..."
/r/MensRights06/05/14 07:23 AM
5

There's a term problem here. Being overall stronger, we all have the 'potential' to react violently. But I would not say potential equates to inclination or likelihood. Even if that physical ability led to (or coincided with) a desire to be violent, it would not mean a higher likelihood if it were still offset by fear of consequence.
/r/MensRights06/05/14 07:22 AM
0

women literally don't take rejection because they just keep making men take all of the initiative. I don't agree with this statement. They are not "making" us do anything. Our gender's overall interest is probably just higher enough that we lose our patience first and initiate approaches.
/r/MensRights06/05/14 07:20 AM
5

even a nice let down like "I have a girlfriend" won't prevent the accusations of misogyny or "being gay". Gay accusations generally occur when someone says they aren't, if a woman says "I have a girlfriend" they're probably not going to get a "what are you, gay?" response. Although related mockery and 'man-hating' comments could follow I suppose.
/r/MensRights06/05/14 07:19 AM
5

The combination of gender switch of drunken approacher with the 'have a boyfriend' Q makes me think you're a female in this example... But how exactly would "so you're a lesbian then?" translate? Or do you mean you're a guy and are asked "have a girlfriend?" or "are you gay?" or something?
/r/MensRights06/05/14 07:17 AM
12

I think it's a problem that we consider it 'rudeness' for a woman to declare a lack of interest in us. Hate to side with the bitchy feminists here, but they don't exactly owe us a gentle letdown simply because we dug deep down and found the confidence to approach them. Not that I don't appreciate a gentle polite letdown, but that's more a gift from them than an obligation, and I think we should see it as merely neutrality, rather than a fault or malicious act, for a woman to avoid this and give …
/r/MensRights06/05/14 07:13 AM
-2

Mad respect for this Eberhart Smith, I declare that she's spoken for, but by herself, not by another. Also she's taken... my heart!
/r/MensRights06/05/14 07:10 AM
0

Sure it does, you can always try to convince someone to either cheat on their current relationship or opt to end it and start a new one.
/r/MensRights06/05/14 07:07 AM
2

It's wrong (assault) to give a lap dance to someone who doesn't want it. If the implication here is that it would be refused if the teacher was ugly, then yes. It would also be wrong to give a lap dance if you were a hot teacher if the student didn't want it. Like pehaps he's gay, or has a girlfriend, or is religious, or is into 2D girls like Sakura Kinomoto.
/r/MensRights06/05/14 07:05 AM
4

I would dispute that a 15 year old guy would be too ignorant to process a lap dance from a teacher. Just what university diploma do you need to process that, exactly?
/r/MensRights06/05/14 07:04 AM
1

the core idea in feminism is, in itself, about equality, no matter how much that has been tainted by actual feminists since then. I dispute this claim and challenge you to prove it. The etymology's clear to me: it's been focused on elevating women, not equalizing them, since the get-go. When has feminism ever fought for equality of obligation rather than privilege?
/r/MensRights22/04/14 04:35 AM
1

some of which vote Democrat despite their obviously anti male stance I don't see this as anti-MRA, more of a 'damned with all the major parties' situation. In some cases it might be de-prioritizing gender issues because republicans want to ammend some religious-fueled restriction.
/r/MensRights22/04/14 04:34 AM
1

For example the (probably fictional at this point) 'take away suffrage' folk.
/r/MensRights22/04/14 04:32 AM
1

Word Up!
/r/MensRights22/04/14 04:30 AM
2

Sometimes Chrome starts to fuck up after a while, no idea why. Can still type normally in notepad and copy+paste stuff. Seems to fix if I end task the process and restart it.
/r/MensRights22/04/14 04:30 AM
1

What if I told you that most people still probably didn't give much of a shit about that?
/r/MensRights22/04/14 04:28 AM
1

Rape and consensual sex and love affairs are risks in same-sex shelters too. Children being created does worry me, this is why sterilization should be a prerequisite for entering these places. If you're too poor to afford your own home then you're too poor to have a kid.
/r/MensRights22/04/14 04:27 AM
0

Even if you're parroting quotes from smart people, it still takes thoughtfulness to discern and understand that they actually ARE smart quotes. Cadence and body language comes in different forms, thoughtfulness is needed to know which are effective, to know what to choose to mimic.
/r/MensRights22/04/14 04:25 AM
0

I don't agree. Violent criminals can have a lot of the same thoughts as everyone else does. They clearly vary in thinking in a specific respect (the thinking that controls whether or not they do violence) but we ALL vary in certain respects from one another in various areas.
/r/MensRights19/04/14 05:17 AM
0

common trait among psychopaths. They seem like decent, thoughtful guys. It's an act. It is impossible to fake being thoughtful.
/r/MensRights19/04/14 05:16 AM
3

About the only citations I could provide you showing people raised to hate women would be bible passages blaming them for sin/temptation and stuff. Which is sort of a problem... but feminists are too scared to collectively support an anti-christian bandwagon so...
/r/MensRights19/04/14 05:16 AM
0

No, probably because ever since Life in the Dreamhouse, Barbie is fucking awesome.
/r/MensRights19/04/14 05:14 AM
1

How do you manage to link to 3690 seconds instead of the hour/minute tags OP? Did you calculate it out or something? I don't think opportunity can be perfectly equal, we can strive to approach equality, but also be realistic.
/r/MensRights19/04/14 05:13 AM
8

I'm confused at how the government can legally fund these shelters when they're so inherently sexist.
/r/MensRights19/04/14 05:11 AM
8

sometimes couples are violent towards each other Alright, so why not keep violent women out of the shelters and let the men stay? there's concerns about what happens when lust enters the mix Cliff's notes: they think men in shelters will rape the women. So let's let them freeze to death.
/r/MensRights19/04/14 05:10 AM
-4

Feminists and MRAs are striving for the same goal No they fucking aren't, why has the sub been polluted with this bullshit? If feminism was striving for equality we'd see organized movements to destroy alimony and give men reproductive equality, freedom to match what they gained with abortion's legalization.
/r/MensRights19/04/14 05:08 AM
8

OP, while it's all well and POLITE that you got the PC "good idea!" and "I'd support that!" out of them... money talks. Unless they actually support this in their actions, newsletters, statements, efforts to split funding, it's just talk. Being nice doesn't change what their priorities might be (women over men) and misandrists can talk like this too. Politeness can be intelligent to avoid earning enemies or criticism, yet their actions can still disregard that which they orate to like.
/r/MensRights19/04/14 05:07 AM
1

The basic idea behind the concept is that there is a widespread tolerance of rape at Cornell and other universities, largely because society teaches men to disregard the importance of the consent of women in sexual encounters. To those who believe in “rape culture,” rape is not the result of a few bad actors, but is tolerated, even encouraged, in our college culture. Rule 1 of rape club: do NOT talk about rape club. The oft-cited figure that one-in-four women will been sexually assaulted at leas…
/r/MensRights19/04/14 04:59 AM
7

So if you have sex with anyone ever before menopause, get ready for a pregnancy. (Unless you want to try for an illegal, unsafe abortion procedure.) Oh please, they had herbs and shit back then You can also masturbate in private, you don't need a cock spasming in your vagina to get pleasure, and a lot of women wouldn't give that out anyway, and a lot of men weren't getting it either. Don't act like sex is some entitled privilege men had back then, we had blue balls.
/r/MensRights19/04/14 04:56 AM
3

We used to call it -chubby bunny- when someone would stuff marshmallows in there mouth. This could be a fun basis for slang.
/r/MensRights18/04/14 01:45 AM
5

Do we kill black people and rape women simultaneously or do we alternate.
/r/MensRights18/04/14 01:45 AM
2

Accusations are when you blame someone, if you blame the wrong person it is false. If she was actually raped, it would not be a false crime reporting, of course. But the process of affixing the crime report via an accusation would be false if misattributed.
/r/MensRights18/04/14 01:42 AM
1

We should not be asking to have the video removed, that would be removing evidence of a crime. We should be reporting it to police like the title says. It is more important to get this woman jailed for USWAM than it is to get the video taken down. STDs and molestation will hurt boys more than this video.
/r/MensRights18/04/14 01:01 AM
2

I do not agree, clearly some reports get read since they are quick to remove things feminists and SRS people gang up on.
/r/MensRights18/04/14 12:53 AM
2

Title is kinda misleading since old guy is merely a considered MRA helping out a bro be aware of his risk and not actually mistaking him. Only situation in vid he describes where he is actually mistaken is when grabbing nephew at beach park where no camera was involved.
/r/MensRights18/04/14 12:49 AM
1

Admit nothing! In HS bullies threw grapes at me, and when I went over and grabbed their bag of grapes to throw it out and make them stop, I got assaulted for -stealing- and they denied ever throwing them. Luckily I had some classmates at witnesses about someone from their table initiating things, and that I was getting shoved and tripped without fighting back. Not to mention the milk-on-head. Good times.
/r/MensRights18/04/14 12:38 AM
1

The law also requires 2 parties consent to assault, and in the case of minors I do not think even that is adequate, so if you are being assaulted and not helped, you should be allowed to break that less important law in your defense to gather evidence.
/r/MensRights18/04/14 12:38 AM
1

Unions are not a guarantee against pressure, just a heavy bulwark to overcome.
/r/MensRights18/04/14 12:36 AM
1

I would wager more net good is done, and less harm done, through allowing recording for private and police use.
/r/MensRights18/04/14 12:36 AM
1

Two-party consent laws should only apply to malicious broadcasting and not recording for private use.
/r/MensRights18/04/14 12:35 AM
1

Basically since they deleted the evidence, no evidence actually exists that he was being bullied and they just pretend like he was spying on his classmates.
/r/MensRights18/04/14 12:34 AM
1

All the more reason to make backups, trust noone. In fact, get a separate device and record them making you delete your expendible dupes.
/r/MensRights18/04/14 12:33 AM
1

Hopefully not only those going after to prosecute, but also those who made him delete the recording and those who turned a blind eye and did not investigate on his behalf.
/r/MensRights18/04/14 12:32 AM
1

How can something be both normal AND uncommon. If something is not common then it is not normal.
/r/MensRights18/04/14 12:31 AM
2

Is your story as good as WordGirl
/r/MensRights18/04/14 12:30 AM
3

Next up we have republican recycling, brony bioinformatics and communist chemistry.
/r/MensRights18/04/14 12:27 AM
5

We already say XY instead of YX, that should be satisfactory.
/r/MensRights18/04/14 12:25 AM
5

The man-hate is inherent that they paint us as villains who harass them out of jobs and do not compensate them fairly, rather than it being a result of them not wanting to work as long or hard as us.
/r/MensRights18/04/14 12:22 AM
1

Not what I am saying. What I mean is to clarify that them getting some facts right will still leave me critical of other statements or viewpoints, I am skeptical that their views are utterly free of distortion if they still cling to the feminism label unless it is a misleading recruitment tactic for egalitarianism, in which case I can sorta respect it but kinda frown on it ethically.
/r/MensRights18/04/14 12:16 AM
1

agreed, 14 was fucking dumb, guy could not imagine he might be a rebound fling after she finally gave up on pursuing some other dude
/r/MensRights18/04/14 12:14 AM
4

Or look within 45 degrees of her direction.
/r/MensRights18/04/14 12:13 AM
2

This would not be a large problem if we had wolverine-like healing factors. Future-Lisa likes Zombie-Milhouse.
/r/MensRights18/04/14 12:12 AM
2

Perhaps we should boycott newspapers which publish the names of accuse and give our business solely to papers which have not done so.
/r/MensRights17/04/14 09:16 PM
3

Methinks that even the most superior genes could be driven to suicide if one were inadequately nurtured and adequately tortured. Heck, we even have genes to sacrifice ourselves for others. Many people consider themselves burdens on society and do it for that reason, which is tragic. The world would benefit from bronies, I want this kid around. We should chip in and buy this kid a lat pulldown. Then he can do at least 20 pull ups and have big arms and impress the bullies with his rope-climbing sk…
/r/MensRights17/04/14 09:14 PM
3

The wordplay is clever but something tells me that someone concocted this long ago the first time a a homosexual or effeminate male was brutally injured and that the phrase is merely being reused here, which is not particularly clever. I would only be thoroughly impressed in a grim fashion if I knew someone came up with it on the spot. The first instance may have taken a long time to generate though.
/r/MensRights17/04/14 09:12 PM
1

I always forget what irony is, but I see it as an outlet for frustration. Kind of like how in The Ant Bully you see the main character in the start get picked on by the bigger bully and he immediately begins to torture the smaller ants as an outlet for the frustration and to try and appear big. Not being interested in giving the show a chance is fine, as it giving it one and not being grabbed, but to go beyond that to hating the fandom just shows a real void of purpose. People with interests tha…
/r/MensRights17/04/14 09:09 PM
1

----actual rapes are far more I hope you have a source for that.
/r/MensRights17/04/14 08:34 PM
2

Also troublesome since I think we can get in legal trouble for recording without consent, or at least notification. If we wear shirts saying -I am recording you, leave my proximity if you do not consent- would that suffice...
/r/MensRights17/04/14 08:34 PM
1

I do not agree. Calling a rape accusation false does not imply a crime never occurred, just that this specific crime did not. If A murders B and A accuses C of murdering B, that is a false murder accusation. Calling it that does not imply that a murder never occurred.
/r/MensRights17/04/14 08:31 PM
2

Are you saying a man can be charged with rape even when the victim does not point them out...
/r/MensRights17/04/14 08:30 PM
2

As I am not able to know where the lines of rare and rampant are drawn, I will simply state that since lying is easier than physical assault, that false rape accusations must logically outnumber rapes. Stats be damned, a biased court system leads to false accusations resulting in successful convictions and false accusations rarely are going to end up in prosecution or counting yet still result in negative effects on the life of a man.
/r/MensRights17/04/14 08:29 PM
1

The interview criteria in this vid is a load of shit, could not bear to finish watching it. What a bunch of sucking up.
/r/MensRights17/04/14 08:24 PM
2

I wager there are is a higher percentage of man-hating feminists than molesting priests, and I hate religion
/r/MensRights17/04/14 08:20 PM
2

falsely believing men are not victims is a part of the rape culture 1 in 6 men are victims of sexual abuse in their childhood It is all well and good, but get to the feminism, and understand we will not excuse shit just because some gets right.
/r/MensRights17/04/14 08:17 PM
1

Would PIV include if a man were chained to a bed and drugged and a woman rode his erection with a knife to the man's throat? Or do they have a separate term like vagina on/around penis (VOP/VAP) to cover a woman initiating envelopment through her movement rather than a man initiating penetrating through his?
/r/MensRights17/04/14 08:14 PM
5

Agreeing with the poster shouldn't really except posts from getting deleted... especially since other things could be added beyond that. I do think that reddit should enable deleter-enabling. For example if a user deletes their own post, reddit should tell us that. If a mod deletes it, it should name which mod did the deletion. Furthermore, the option of summarizing the reason for doing so (perhaps with premade templates) should also be postable, so that other posters (and the post author) can u…
/r/MensRights17/04/14 08:12 PM
1

Just a song? As Mamoru Takamura would put it "don't underestimate it!"
/r/MensRights17/04/14 08:05 PM
1

There is no biological reason why females should not be just as good at and interested in science as males. I Well, there is stuff like brain biology, influenced by genes and hormones and all that jazz, which I don't claim to understand, but which might result in different predispositions or ease in doing some tasks.
/r/MensRights17/04/14 08:04 PM
1

I can remember this today, but I fear I will quickly forget how to do this flair thing to get the word/logo to appear. Could you please include a link to this post at http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/wiki/faq ? "Flair" is not mentioned there and a link to this thread would be great. I can inevitably predict I will forget how to do this within the week, and unless this will always be stickied as the first thread forever, the FAQ linking to it will help it be found. Also please make the color/wo…
/r/MensRights17/04/14 08:01 PM
1

I didn't mean that avoiding men in particular was a means to empowerment, or that fucking a man would compromise that, just that it's relying on another person to make the rebellion happen. don't women themselves have sexualities and sexual desires? Yes, but why not just masturbate? Perhaps that would not enrage a possessive boyfriend adequately, but even there: rebelling on the standards of the one you're trying to escape, rather than of your own manifested happiness.
/r/MensRights12/04/14 09:44 AM
2

Can we just say men? I don't like this parent-singling.
/r/MensRights12/04/14 09:41 AM
3

Or lack the aptitude for it. Some combination. It's not for shortage of female-aimed scholarships.
/r/MensRights12/04/14 09:37 AM
6

Why isn't she the one being charged?
/r/MensRights12/04/14 09:36 AM
11

General nerd-attacking, they go after bronies too.
/r/MensRights12/04/14 08:42 AM
2

Only the extremist portions that want to make the world like the Amazonian episode of Futurama. 'not the most sexist' is hardly 'not sexist', and there are worse examples out there than hot muscly snu-snu
/r/MensRights12/04/14 08:41 AM
3

I think if feminism is inherently sexist, as many MRAs claim it to be, then the inverse must also be true. While both have a gender-based focus, feminism isn't about egalitarian rights and MRA is a reactionary movement to establish that for real. powerful entities who don't give a shit about our genders... We'll get right to slaying those boogie-men after women give us back our reproductive autonomy.
/r/MensRights12/04/14 08:39 AM
3

Ugh... we could eventually find them, but they're rare enough to make it enough of an effort that most of us are too lazy to. Let the feminists do that work.
/r/MensRights12/04/14 08:38 AM
4

Yeah, but apparently if we opt to show disapproval through downvotes rather than censorship, we're endorsing the comments.
/r/MensRights12/04/14 08:37 AM
5

C'mon admins!
/r/MensRights12/04/14 08:37 AM
4

Why is 'business insider' discussing Reddit stereotypes? Can we even confirm that the guys in http://static.businessinsider.com/image/51d48e3969beddae15000008/image.jpg consider themselves MRAs, much less post here? Even if they were, this would clearly be a parody of the "misogyny" stereotypes and not a legitimate expression. Notably the guy also subtly picks at /r/atheism, might want to give them a ring about this too.
/r/MensRights12/04/14 08:26 AM
1

To play devil's/feminist's advocate here, the idea that you need to fuck another man to escape the first man's power is still pretty guy-focused.
/r/MensRights12/04/14 08:23 AM
3

naked beautiful women as sex object props I disagree about that. They were animate participants in the video. Being a background dancer doesn't make you an object or a prop.
/r/MensRights12/04/14 08:21 AM
7

I think it would be a good idea to have cameras aimed at all fire alarms too, and make it illegal to block the view of the alarm from the camera so accomplices won't aid in obscuring the puller.
/r/MensRights12/04/14 08:18 AM
3

Same with the world in general?
/r/MensRights12/04/14 08:17 AM
3

a transperson should be considered either a man or a woman. Not some third "other". Not necessarily. Transgender is a broad label not solely meaning MtFs/FtMs. It also includes bigender and genderqueer, so it's not an either/or situation. It can also be an also/none.
/r/MensRights12/04/14 08:17 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter