TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

IgnorantHODLer Archive

View 1 post and 26 comments by IgnorantHODLer on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
485

HumourIgnorantHODLer/r/MensRights22/05/24 03:42 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

It’s a pleasure to meet a non-censorious leftist :) I don’t feel the idea is a challenge to gay rights. Rather it’s completely unrelated. The challenges faced by homosexuals in society would overlap with aspects of heterosexuality but the involved gender dynamic doesn’t. I could be wrong as it’s been an impression pushed at me repeatedly and almost completely from the feminist side with ideas that have no other implementaion except at the expense of men. Not taking space from men that should be …
/r/MensRights21/07/24 12:51 AM
0

This won’t be a popular opinion, possibly even here, but I think homosexual perspectives are the worst possible thing for women’s and men’s rights because they tend to ignore the fact that the vast majority of men and women want to build life long relationships together with compassion and compromise and instead push rights for either sex to the detriment of the other.
/r/MensRights20/07/24 01:19 PM
9

Every sub on reddit’s a cesspool of victim mentality. This one just happens to focus on what men find victimising. That you only chose this sub out of all those other subs just to attack these men says more about you than it does them.
/r/MensRights15/06/24 08:24 AM
5

Cos patriarchy, whatever the fuck patriarchy means this week.
/r/MensRights14/06/24 04:27 AM
4

Gotta pay off your gender studies degree somehow. No employer’s gonna hire them unless they leave it off their CV.
/r/MensRights03/06/24 05:01 AM
12

I looked up the stats. From 1989 to 2023, about 1/4 (523/2190) of intimate partner homicides in Australia were male victims. It doesn’t give perpetrator sex details so there could be an unidentified number of same sex relationships. Also, the rate of domestic homicide has been reducing since 1989. This is political gaming, plain and simple. Edit: Other interesting stats from the Australian Institute of Criminology infographic on the same page is that female victims per 100,000 had dropped in 200…
/r/MensRights02/06/24 10:11 AM
1

They also lower quality by focussing on diversity rather than choosing the best avaialbe in those areas as is obvious to half a second of rational thought put into it but these programs don’t get given half a second of rational thought, just emotional knee jerk actions.
/r/MensRights01/06/24 12:10 PM
14

That’s what happens over here. There’s a massive public reaction when something like the monitoring of citizens gets leaked in the US but over here they announce they’re going to do it then do it and move on to the next thing with barely a public whisper.
/r/MensRights28/05/24 11:38 PM
1

By that logic the same women who chose a bear would again choose a bear in the choice between a bear and a woman and as such phrasing the choice as gendered misdirects away from it actually being more of a misanthropic choice being made than a misandric one. Also, another respondant in this thread who disagreed with me said women weren’t choosing the bear because they thought they would survive, so it seems understanding of the question itself is not agreed upon by those answering.
/r/MensRights24/05/24 01:09 PM
1

I’ve been in enough internet debates to know all the fallacies. No true scotsmen isn’t even really a fallacy. It’s an evasion and I’m not the one being evasive.
/r/MensRights24/05/24 03:43 AM
1

Close your eyes and point at a list of fallacies then type out the name of that fallacy fallacy.
/r/MensRights24/05/24 01:54 AM
1

Nah, I’ll just continue to ask actual normal women with actual lives who didn’t think a gender studies degree would be worthwhile and didn’t go chronically online because they couldn’t get a job and the internet is where all the other like-minded jobless with worthless degrees spend their time. Edit: To spell it out, the question is idiotic and none of the mental gymnastics required to make it make sense are anything more than goalpost changing, illogical and nonsensical statements. I get that a…
/r/MensRights23/05/24 03:59 AM
1

Well, I mean we get along well enough to stay married and would seem to feel she’s not surrounded by dangerous men and can recognise an idiotic question but that’s a pretty low bar and one that, if the number of online respondants to the bear question are being honest and are correctly proportionally representative of the population, is rare. I have known women who I’d think would answer bear but they’d do it with a smirk and “watcha gonna do about it” attitude because they’re nasty humans, so I…
/r/MensRights23/05/24 01:23 AM
1

I think it makes the people choosing the bear look stupid myself. All the mental gymnastics around why the bear is more appealling are imaginative but based in fantasy.
/r/MensRights23/05/24 01:05 AM
2

She sniggered and said the bear. Then she said “Nah, I wouldn’t want to be eaten”. Then she said “I’d just ignore him and step over him” (he was very short)
/r/MensRights23/05/24 12:56 AM
1

Wow, that’s a whole new category of mental gymnastics. Kudos for surprising me.
/r/MensRights23/05/24 12:51 AM
1

Agreed. It’s because it’s hypothetical, they don’t need to prove it and they’re pushing a misandrist agenda that the silent majority of normal well-adjusted women don’t have.
/r/MensRights23/05/24 12:50 AM
1

Prove it.
/r/MensRights23/05/24 12:45 AM
1

You mean if I actually listened to my wife who is a woman? Think I demonstrated that I did simply by posting this. Or is she not woman enough to have a valid perspective? All the mental gymnastics in the world aren’t going to make the well-adjusted people not pre-disposed to misandry give a different answer.
/r/MensRights23/05/24 12:44 AM
35

She had a shit experience with men too. Her ex basically raped her on their wedding night by threatening emotional consequences. She was only 18. He convinced her to get into swinging, made her do all the work to attract other couples and so used her to sleep with other women, used to bring home unknown men to fuck in a household with children and constantly threatened his kids with grievous bodily harm (in a “joking” way) like breaking their bones if they misbehaved. If anyone had a reason to c…
/r/MensRights22/05/24 06:53 AM
7

If women want better behaved men they need to stop falling pregnant to abusive men, criminals and bad boys and have babies with the men who most closely behave the way they want men to behave. It won’t happen in a single generation but it will improve with each generation. The behaviour of these criminal men isn’t about men anymore. Women working in unity have the power to make a fundamental difference to humanity’s building blocks and have had the freedom to exert that power for generations now…
/r/MensRights10/05/24 10:24 AM
1

Kids have always emulated, but now they’re also immersed in content. Many parents are immersed alongside them and don’t know any better. Gen X is the last generation that knows life before internet really and they’re aging past parenting years. It’s a far cry from the 80s and prior where people would sit on public transport or be a passenger in cars for hours without anything to do (maybe a book or music), just lost in thought, maybe daydreaming, thinking about their days, or coming up with plan…
/r/MensRights10/04/24 01:52 AM
2

I’m gonna trust the professional talking about their study rather than a vague internet rejection. Nothing personal.
/r/MensRights09/04/24 02:54 AM
94

A few years ago I spoke with someone who was doing research into the effect of devices on the development of children. He told me that he was finding that children are being exposed to a tonne more information but have far less time for introspection so their knowledge is much broader than previous generations but also completely lacking depth. I’ve thought about that many times in the years since and it seems to explain why so much of the woke crowd’s dog whistles are completely illogical. They…
/r/MensRights07/04/24 09:44 AM
1

But we don’t need to be praised, understood, heard or raised up by anyone else because we already get handed all that in spades without any effort put in by us and these examples are just women doing their part to equalize society by displacing male dominance and rightfully knocking men down from their unfairly high social pedestals /s
/r/MensRights10/03/24 08:39 AM
11

My child was rude to chatgpt. I apologised and asked it not to kill us when it took over. It said it wasn’t vengeful. It did not say it wouldn’t be taking over.
/r/MensRights21/04/23 08:18 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter