IjustcametosayAnyang Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
0	Has there been a discussion on here about MRAs, red pill swallowers, misogyny, and the lines between?		IjustcametosayAnyang	/r/MensRights	23/11/13 08:09 AM

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
5	Psych book. Second sentence. It's obvious you have absolutely no knowledge of the field of psychology or psychiatry or their respective literature.	/r/MensRights	03/04/14 06:48 AM
1	Has there been a discussion on here about MRAs, red pill swallowers, misogyny, and the lines between? First of all...thank you for deciding to engage in a dialog. Also, thank you for clearly differentiating puas and masculists- even though the distinction is obvious now, before it was somewhat intertwined for me. So I appreciate that. That being said... amused mastery (a Game concept) is BY FAR the best way to deal with women. Is there any evidence that supports this, other than anecdotal accounts? As far as I'm concerned, literally everything that game theorists push is pseudoscience, and socia…	/r/MensRights	25/11/13 02:13 AM
1	Has there been a discussion on here about MRAs, red pill swallowers, misogyny, and the lines between? You seem like a very angry person. I'm pushing an agenda? What agenda would that be? The one of the Rabbit people? Instead of spouting labels and nonsense, you should try adding substance to conversations that people are attempting to have about MR. Calling me a concern troll does nothing. On the other hand, explaining why it is your opinion that the red pill and masculinists should not be a concern of MR, would actually be productive.	/r/MensRights	24/11/13 09:29 PM
0	Has there been a discussion on here about MRAs, red pill swallowers, misogyny, and the lines between? Yes exactly. Sites like this talk about some of the same issues, such as parental rights and false rape claims, but then go off the deep end on reconforming to gender roles, especially stressing the need for masculine men. What I'm saying is sites like this are making it difficult for the real MRM to connect with those we need to connect with, as it associates MR with extremist ideas.	/r/MensRights	23/11/13 07:04 PM
0	Has there been a discussion on here about MRAs, red pill swallowers, misogyny, and the lines between? Ha. Alright. I'm very confused as to why it makes more sense to get angry and call me a troll, based in what I've said so far, rather than engage in a conversation. I'm trying to learn here. However this topic seems so obvious for everyone else.. maybe it isn't an issue worth discussing. At least on this forum.	/r/MensRights	23/11/13 07:00 PM
0	Has there been a discussion on here about MRAs, red pill swallowers, misogyny, and the lines between? Or maybe you actually meant pendant. Which would, metaphorically, make sense. Ha. Sorry if I misinterpreted.	/r/MensRights	23/11/13 09:31 AM
0	Has there been a discussion on here about MRAs, red pill swallowers, misogyny, and the lines between? Although pedant isn't the word I would use, that's an interesting thought. Care to expand on it? I guess I'm not really sure how what that site is doing is commenting on feminism. More so it feels like its own philosophy, rooted in morals (e.g. alpha living, homophobia) that, while they have nothing to do with MR, may be associated with the MRM by the general public, and thus be damaging to MR.	/r/MensRights	23/11/13 09:29 AM
0	Has there been a discussion on here about MRAs, red pill swallowers, misogyny, and the lines between? I skimmed that. That's not my intention at all. I think that sites like Return of Kings have the very real potential to negatively impact MRAs. Basically by, like I said, confusing priorities. I'm not trying to "pit anyone against each other." I consider myself an MRA....	/r/MensRights	23/11/13 08:16 AM