TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Ill-Tip-7053 Archive

View 0 posts and 81 comments by Ill-Tip-7053 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

I mean… on paper…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/22 06:35 PM
8

I think it was an example of ‘living on the wild side’ as opposed to just dating a bully.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/22 05:10 PM
1

Sooo, your not going to answer it, because you say so?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/22 07:01 AM
5

Did you report me as mentally unwell? 😂 You troll good man. Love these kinds of jokes. 😂 good game, good game.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/22 08:38 PM
4

This is some good trolling.. almost had he believing you were serious. 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/22 08:17 PM
9

No, it’s a silly myth that people like to put out there. I’m a 30yo guy and tend look for women aged 28 to 33. Any younger and I find they tend to be a little immature, or are into the idea of a guy with a higher end career etc, but not quite understood the sacrifices/demands that entails. Why would a 30-35 year old guy want a gf who’s barely out of uni? There are exceptions of course. Even if you’re only considering physical looks…Guys mature quite a lot around 30, so tight party dresses become…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/22 06:38 PM
1

Just be nice to answer the question…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/22 01:59 PM
1

Just be nice for an answer is all… unless you’re acknowledging your hypocrisy. You think it is relevant.. that doesn’t make it so, just because you say so.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/22 12:23 PM
1

Just be nice if you answered the question…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/22 11:37 AM
1

You do you man. Have fun not looking after your gf and picking up slack where you can. (Assuming you don’t actually have a gf, from your attitude). Thanks for ignoring the tax questions. Nice to know you’re running on double standards. Your argument on the rich is boring and avoiding the point. I guess you could argue you’re only looking at at the 0.00001%, which again is missing the point.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/22 09:19 AM
1

Yes people who make more should be taxed a higher value as a result of percentages. The point is that in comparison, for this X amount, he would have to put in considerably less grind pound for pound. I obviously didn’t mean he would be sat there doing nothing. Yes he should aim to make her life easier, as she should his. I don’t understand your problem with this. You have an obligation to put your partner first in most instances. You might not live on the same street but you are part of a wider…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/22 02:36 PM
1

She should pay the same percentage of her income. A happy wife does make a happy life, what’s so controversial about this? It doesn’t mean she shouldn’t be trying to make you happy too. Unless you disagree? I never said he didn’t grind? Last time I checked, rich people still live within the same system as the rest of us. (Please don’t come out with the tax avoidance thing, to try and make your next point, because that’s actually illegal). It is relevant because you’re asking someone (supposedly …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/22 10:27 AM
1

Hu? I’m not flip flopping. Who ever earns more can afford to pay a higher monetary figure. Pretty consistent. Of course he grinds… just like richer people pay higher taxes to live in the same community as the poor. Unless you think rich people should pay exactly the same monetary value as the poor? (I’d be surprised if you do think this). It’s just she might have to give up 2 weeks of her life to front the same value that he might only have to spend 1hr, for example… I’d personally not be comfor…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/22 10:12 AM
1

You do you
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/22 07:30 AM
8

You won’t win. They’re trapped in viewing the world through a ‘them vs I’, or a ‘what do get out is this’ mind set. It’s a bit like refusing to pick up litter in your front garden because you weren’t the one who dropped it… be interesting to hear if they think tax should be a fixed value, where the rich pay the same as the poor. The idea of mutually benefiting as a team who inputs what they can, whatever that might be, is totally lost.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/22 01:31 PM
2

You should be putting effort into making your partner happy. The woman’s half is the same proportional input.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/22 12:48 PM
1

Her half is in the same proportional input of her full time income.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/22 12:47 PM
1

No I didn’t say any of that
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/22 12:36 PM
1

Pretty much
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/22 12:32 PM
1

You’re only looking at it by counting the number of coins. You’re not considering anything else.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/22 12:32 PM
1

You dint spell it like that
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/22 10:34 PM
1

Oh soh these multiple jabs only take an hour or two out of your day do thay
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/22 10:29 PM
1

Nonsensical isn’t even a word
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/22 10:28 PM
1

Okay you do have a point here. Still, I haven’t experienced it to be as universal as it’s made out to be. I think it’s got more to do with general competency than being rich. A good example is being a fireman. It’s not huge money, but is still considered attractive, as would running a coffee shop as another example.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/22 10:27 PM
1

You just said you work multiple jobs and have to hustle on the side. Sownds graet
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/22 10:23 PM
1

Loook at whay your writing. you clearly have no gripping of the language you clemn to be so good at. You’re quoting linens that make perfect scenes and have no idea how stupid you lok
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/22 10:20 PM
1

Hahaha! You have to work a lot to get by, from the sounds of things. I don’t, never have actually.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/22 10:15 PM
1

Dick is a name wish is shirt for Herry. You idiot. Try farming a fall sentence, you’re’s is so full of errors is staggering. It’s like all you do all dey is try and sound clever on Reddit
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/22 10:13 PM
0

Oh my god here you never heard of autocorrect? Wish I had a part time jab, must be so amazing to bump along the bottom.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/22 10:10 PM
0

I don’t think calling you a moron sounds clever. I’m just saying it because you are one. go On; write another essay about correct grammer on Reddit. Dick
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/22 10:02 PM
0

I assume you’re not aware of auto correct. If you’re going to keep on this track, you should probably edit out some of your errors. Idiot Your argument was exactly as I said it. Fool. Terrific, you’re a teacher. You know what they say about those that can’t… Moron
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/22 09:52 PM
0

You seem to have learned that word and enjoy using it. What other words do you like to use to try and make yourself sound bright? You’re right though, going off topic to write about someone’s grammar on Reddit is really clever. Prat
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/22 09:51 PM
1

Oh 😂 well I bid you good sir.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/22 09:48 PM
1

Dude most people aren’t trying to use you for your money. Most people just want a decent partner they can rely on. You’ve had some bad experiences and let the internet amplify that. Go down to your local sports club, as long as you can afford to live, most people really just don’t care.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/22 09:43 PM
0

You’re whole thing now is ‘I know you are but what am I’. You’re an idiot.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/22 09:40 PM
0

Not really, it’s Reddit, where people quickly and loosely type on their phones… guess you haven’t figured that out… unless you really are trying to use grammar on Reddit to try and sound clever. Idiot.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/22 09:39 PM
1

What lesson will I have learned? That I was paying less for more whilst with someone? What exactly will I have lost here? How do you think you need to handle it then? Because you’re so good at it, being a single 40yr man. You should stop viewing people on financial rankings. People don’t actually care that much about it, as long as you’re not totally dependent at first.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/22 09:24 PM
0

You’re a moron
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/22 09:19 PM
0

No I called you a moron because you couldn’t figure out that by being happy to pay more I’d be happy to go halves. Then you came out with some moronic line about me agreeing with you, as well as all the rest of the twisting you’ve been doing. I also called you a moron because of how you seem so wrapped in the idea of power in a relationship. Look at your last message. Are you a capable of reading comprehension? What’s multiple wives got to do with anything? You’re a moron, that can’t read.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/22 09:17 PM
1

I lived with one for years…. You’re bitter, you can use all the words in the world. At some point you have to start thinking, maybe it’s not every woman on the planet that’s the problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/22 09:09 PM
0

You think two people who live together but aren’t married are classed as dating?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/22 09:05 PM
1

No you know that’s not what the question was. How do you feel about paying more than your partner? I’d be happy to pay more so naturally I’d also be happy to pay half’s or less. You’re a moron. Have fun staying single and scoring your partners. Guess you could always run a tally when you go off on weekends.. I guess if you wanna go somewhere she can’t afford, she could always wait at home.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/22 09:04 PM
0

No dating is a term used to define the period before you became gf and bf. That nice couple that just moved In across the road isn’t dating. People who are going on dates are dating.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/22 09:00 PM
1

Sure it’s not just bitter single middle aged man talk? I’ve had a few gfs who were earning more and came from wealthier families. So I know it’s not true.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/22 08:56 PM
0

You are. How don you feel about you paying more? None of this is a me problem, why do you think it is? I’m more than happy help my partner, as a result I’m more than to go half’s if they really want. It is by definition a you problem. You would rather live worse off to avoid you having to pay more than her… this makes it a selfish you problem. Even though you’re trying to make out it’s about equality.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/22 08:48 PM
0

It you live together you’re not dating
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/22 08:44 PM
1

Women are not obsessed with dating up, this is just some line loser guys who aren’t fun or interesting use to blame the world use. You’re bitter.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/22 08:43 PM
0

Well it does. Because you could be living a nicer life. But your more interested in someone else getting a better deal… a deal that would benefit you.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/22 08:37 PM
1

Your right, you should keep that mantra. Never ever change your mind and never help your gf if she gets into financial difficulties. The fact you’d rather pay more for less is also good. No way you should benefit if someone else is getting a better half of the deal.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/22 08:35 PM
0

Lots of failed relationships, hu? I just can’t imagine judging people on their financial status. It’s a poisonous and shallow perspective. ‘I only date people with money’… top stuff It’s your concern because before you get to that point, you should have her best interests at heart.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/22 08:32 PM
0

Well it’s not because I live a nicer life in a nicer house in a nicer neighbourhood.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/22 08:26 PM
1

Do you have a partner? It sounds like you don’t…. You should ease up on your views a little. Yes men don’t come out of divorce well. But that doesn’t mean you have to reduce your standard of living and stick to this 50/50 thing the whole time. You need to make sure you’ll both okay, but whilst your together you should be pulling together in mutual benefit.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/22 08:11 PM
1

Amazing. Healthy relationships don’t have to consider power dynamics… Again, you’re only counting equal as a financial value. There’s so much more to it. Ultimately, you’d chose a worser place to live, over paying just a little bit more than your partner. Just seems so selfish to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/22 08:08 PM
2

But that’s just an expensive way of pouring money away? You could both stick with your original rental/mortgage amounts, then move into somewhere nicer together. You’re both better off for it. But because it’s not 50/50 you’re shouting yourself in the foot. You do have an obligation toward your partner yes. You’re saying you don’t? Yeah you don’t think you should help each other do you. That’s the difference. I think you should pull together. If she was having financial difficulties, it’s not he…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/22 08:05 PM
1

You’re just trying to spin your words now. 😂 My whole point was that the bricky clearly is pulling his weight. 😂 Your not really viewing them as equal though are you? You’re just counting how much money they can pay. Which isn’t a good way to view an equal relationship. Nor has it got anything to do with being viewed as equal partners in a relationship. Why would how much money you can pay have anything to do with that? My ‘fantasy’ was a fairly typical example of a high earning female with a sk…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/22 07:58 PM
1

Well I’m not gay, so no. You’ve also listed every undesirable trait going. Would I date someone who wasn’t ambitious or rich, but was funny caring and full of life. Yes… coming from someone who is ambitious with a high end career and all that.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/22 07:47 PM
3

So you’d live in a place she can’t afford, so she can live in a place she can afford? Instead of joining together as best you can, and both be mutually better off? Also weird how you’d have your gf living somewhere you wouldn’t want to live, whilst you live somewhere better. I guess it’s nice that you’d let her visit. How would you feel if your gf was rich and you were struggling. She refused to let you live with her because you can’t match her living costs. She lets you visit, but your place is…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/22 07:43 PM
2

Nah, it’d look like a prenup for marriage. Or it would look like not holding each others savings in one single pot, or ensuring one person can’t claim the house over the other etc. They’re just things you think about once or twice a year. You’d be doing it together though, so you’d be making sure she was set up in the event of a fall too. Whilst you’re together (I at least) wouldn’t be considering living costs in the same way as you. You do need to hold the phrase ‘what will be will be’ at littl…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/22 07:41 PM
2

Yeah that’s where were on different pages. I don’t see it as transactional. It should be, ‘I want to be around this person, I want to be there for them, come running etc’. You’re right in that women can use looks and men can use money. It’s not a good trait though. In those relationships, you couldn’t ever throw in the towel of your stressful job because she wants money. She’ll know the moment she loses her looks, he’ll be looking for something else… in both cases, having someone that always eve…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/22 06:51 PM
4

Protecting yourself for the event of a breakup/divorce is a different subject, i feel. Yes you should absolutely have protections in place, for in the event that everything goes off the rails. Whilst it’s all still going, you shouldn’t be focusing on the money
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/22 06:37 PM
2

yeah absolutely, you should both be maintaining yourselves for each other anyway. If you want someone who’s like that, then cool. You should be picky in your partners, for sure.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/22 06:31 PM
2

Yes
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/22 06:13 PM
3

Yeah she’d have to look after you like you’d look after her. You’re version; she should get up a leave because you can’t fork out your share on the money.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/22 06:12 PM
2

Yep that’s it. Not judging people on money alone makes you immature.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/22 06:10 PM
3

Because she’d have to go find a job, you’d have insurance and you work through it as a supportive couple… how old are you?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/22 06:09 PM
2

No I’m calling you shallow.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/22 06:08 PM
3

By not dumping you? By looking after your broke sick ass? You seem to think money is everything. There’s so much more.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/22 06:07 PM
3

I’ve literally not mentioned looks once. Another one of your priorities seeping through? 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/22 06:06 PM
5

So you would just not look at a women who makes you happy and will always have your back, because she doesn’t earn enough? You’re just a male gold digger.. kind of sounds a bit classless and scummy, but what ever.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/22 06:04 PM
3

Okay man… keep on chasing that green.. sure you’ll find a deep connection out there that way.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/22 06:02 PM
0

So you’re saying because they don’t earn as much, then they aren’t pulling their weight? Dear god. 😂 What if she was a lawyer, and you were a bricky. She’d be making more than you, her time would be worth more and her effort would be less. BUT according to you, the bricky just simply isn’t pulling his weight enough.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/22 06:00 PM
4

It’s not. It’s just very shallow that you would choose money instead of being with someone that makes you happy, someone that will stick by you, someone that will support you. I’m a well off guy and the best gf I ever had had hardly a penny. Making sure she had a nice home made me happy… I guess it’s something you lack or haven’t experienced yet, I dunno.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/22 05:54 PM
2

That’s a very sad and twisted view of relationships. You should want to help your partner because you want to help them. Nothing more nothing less. You shouldn’t be keeping a score card, and you shouldn’t be thinking about profit.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/22 05:51 PM
3

Hu? How have you come to that conclusion? It’s interesting how you’re only viewing this from the perspective of financial gain. Relationships are so much more than financials. You should want to look after your partner, they should want to look after you. Letting them live with you, and also letting them have their pocket money is not an out-their concept. What you’re saying is, you’ll either not be with them based on their income. Or you’ll live in a shit hole, saving cash whilst they’re workin…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/22 05:50 PM
3

I’m male. I’ve had gfs who earn much more than I and I’ve had gfs that earn much less. You should be there to bring your partner up in what ever ways you can. If I like someone and they earn less, sure they can move into my house and pay a little bit towards living. Generally I like to help make my partners life easier, I certainly don’t look at it as “what do I get out of this”. I’m not going to sell up and live in a rough end of town just because she isn’t giving me enough money. I’m also not …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/22 05:45 PM
2

Some do. Others don’t. Gold digger is the term used for women who date only well off men. You tend to date in the same financial bracket as a result of the places you go, hobbies, social circles etc. It’s based on a mutual understanding. There’s also a big cultural thing at play too. I.e if you chose to take a harder route with less free time etc, then you’re going to see more eye to eye with someone who has chosen something else. Or, if you’re born of money, you’ll see the world the same as som…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/22 03:33 PM
9

Hu.. I guess I’ve never viewed a partner as a financial asset before.. would you ditch your partner if they lost their job and couldn’t pay their 50/50.. or three lost their job and couldn’t get the same pay, would you have to sell your home and down size; blaming it all on them?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/22 03:24 PM
4

I don’t see your point?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/22 03:18 PM
9

You mean other than a happy relaxed and loving partner?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/22 03:06 PM
6

I see what you’re saying, but I have to disagree. If he’s a millionaire and she’s on 50k, then it still seems unfair for her to have to go through the grind and financial stresses etc that he could totally help bear. When the difference is that vast, he could either support her in part time or easier work, or improve their standard of living vastly by reducing her expenses and living in a more comfortable environment. Essentially one person watches the other grind along, whilst the other chills …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/22 02:37 PM
30

I wouldn’t want 50/50 if my partner earned noticeably less than me. Doesn’t sound fair at all. You’re supposed to support each other, not have one forking out a huge proportion of their pay cheque whilst the other doesn’t.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/22 01:16 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter