TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Ill-Truck-8077 Archive

View 3 posts and 162 comments by Ill-Truck-8077 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

Let's not forget, women make the decisions that lead to war, but it is men who overwhelmingly suffer the consequences of war, even with neutral conscription. For what?
/r/MensRights11/10/23 11:38 PM
1

Let's not forget women caused all if thus. Women overwhelmingly supported and imposed years of appeasement, softness and negotiations with genocidal terrorists.
/r/MensRights11/10/23 11:34 PM
37

Don't kill yourself over this, please. Do not let anyone, especially your subhuman ex-wife, push you to give up on life. Your children will eventually learn what their mother did to their father and consequently to them and will make her pay the consequences of her dreadful narcissistic behaviour.
/r/MensRights11/10/23 11:09 PM
2

This. Won't. Work. This is, simply put, a conscious distraction and a way to indoctrinate men in feminist ideology.
/r/MensRights10/10/23 10:18 PM
3

You do realise men are usually brutally tortured before being barbarically murdered, and, not meaning to shock you, that usually involves a MUCH MUCH worse form of rape.
/r/MensRights10/10/23 11:48 AM
2

Nah, listen to conservatives and they say exactly the same things...
/r/MensRights10/10/23 11:39 AM
3

I bet she still blames zionism and excuses their behaviour.
/r/MensRights10/10/23 11:32 AM
16

I know. And yet you fail to live by your own standards.
/r/MensRights29/09/23 01:06 AM
17

Use your brain for once instead of trying to gotcha those who you perceive as a threat to your interests.
/r/MensRights29/09/23 12:31 AM
5

Why can't you be spiteful if you feel used and disregarded? If you feel like you invested time and effort loving and caring someone and that person simply gives up on you at the first opportunity, why can't you feel the way you genuinely feel like? It's a perfectly natural, human response. Just make sure you don't get bitter, that only destroys you. Our society is really fucked up. We actively bully and harass men not to complain and share their genuine feelings and thoughts. Two scenarios 1) We…
/r/MensRights17/08/23 07:05 AM
3

Talk to an attorney as fast as you can and follow his instructions. Shut. The. Fuck. Up. She's no longer a "friend"
/r/MensRights17/08/23 06:49 AM
26

I don't think venting makes you an oversharer. I think men should actually be much more caring of other males, even if they don't know them all that well. That being said, a deep friendship isn't formed by sharing feelings explicitly. It just isn't.
/r/MensRights07/08/23 09:47 PM
6

Typically rip off people they know aren't very well versed in mechanics
/r/MensRights07/08/23 06:02 PM
-2

A lot of mechanics will genuinely rip people off if they don't think they know anything about cars. If a wimp or feminine man shows up at a dishonest mechanic, he will 100% get robbed and even mocked.
/r/MensRights07/08/23 05:59 PM
15

When you can't realistically argue against something, you use fallacies and emotional manipulation to deceive your audience and stain your rhetorical opponent's argument and character. Typical weak narcissistic move.
/r/MensRights05/08/23 03:32 AM
6

If being used as a piece of meat is your thing, go right ahead.
/r/MensRights04/08/23 04:03 PM
71

Ask her if she would be okay with being used as a fleshlight and a replacement for women far more attractive than her? You have every right to feel turned off and even offended by such behaviour. You're not a dick, literally speaking.
/r/MensRights04/08/23 02:55 PM
1

Repulsive comment. Your whole idea of men is that of a tool, not a human being. If he is "alpha" he deserves you, if he is "beta" he doesn't. You and that sort of ruthless, inhumane behaviour is the root cause of how dreadful life is for males. It's exactly like treating women as sexual, reproductive and homemaking objects. Congrats, you are treating men as your great-great-grandfather treated women like you. Men don't really need females either, other than for reproductive purposes, but that is…
/r/MensRights03/08/23 07:39 PM
1

Police and the law. Do you want protection? Generously pay men with taxpayers money. Or get a gun.
/r/MensRights03/08/23 07:17 PM
1

To be fair, neither do Democrats. They are all subservient to the elite class and men are either tools or scapegoats.
/r/MensRights03/08/23 07:12 PM
5

Limited accountability isn't accountability
/r/MensRights03/08/23 02:01 PM
9

How come a statutory rape by the moral leader of a anti-rape movement isn't relevant?
/r/MensRights03/08/23 01:59 PM
12

Brace yourself, Brazil will experience a major cultural revolution which will only make matters worse. Mark my words.
/r/MensRights03/08/23 03:59 AM
1

Children
/r/MensRights03/08/23 12:50 AM
5

She is already acusing him of a whole host of things. I suspect he will have to not only pay alimony, share his wealth, but also share custody of their children. That is, having to see this monster for rest of his life.
/r/MensRights03/08/23 12:50 AM
1

She is just using old man Lula to gain influence and power. She is effectively running the country and she intends to run for the presidency in the future.
/r/MensRights02/08/23 11:53 PM
1

She is a misandrous sexist fuck. To her, men are not individuals but a blob, so if there are men who initiate wars, then men are responsible for it and it doesn't matter if men are dying and suffering because they brought it to themselves. She forgets that women are often cheerleaders of war and they are historically as likely if not more so to start conflict when in power. She also seems to forget women are the majority of the electorate and they can choose to go to war.
/r/MensRights02/08/23 11:47 PM
1

DO. NOT. GO. TO. WAR. EVER.
/r/MensRights02/08/23 11:33 PM
83

"Matriarchy will finally bring peace to the world" Mind you peace is only achieved by smothering totalitarian repression.
/r/MensRights02/08/23 11:26 PM
2

I never thought I would say this, but thank god for a Republican SCOTUS majority. Not because they are Conservative or Republican, but because they are Textualists and Originalists, and, therefore, they are more likely to make egalitarian neutral decisions, not activist decisions. Hopefully, a wave of lawsuits reaches the court and a federal ban on such behaviours is imposed.
/r/MensRights02/08/23 11:22 PM
7

Violence by proxy has to be criminalised exactly like first-person violence is.
/r/MensRights02/08/23 10:43 PM
24

They turned Harvard and even MIT magazines into full-fledged propaganda mouthpieces. Lovely.
/r/MensRights02/08/23 10:35 PM
1

One word, inheritance. You cannot force an adult to do anything, but you can choose who keeps your money once you're gone.
/r/MensRights02/08/23 08:36 PM
1

You can't force, impose, coerce or censor people into "acceptance" at least in a free democratic society ruled by law. It's no acceptance, it's compliance. The culture of "acceptance" is also highly selective and indentitarian which is hardly acceptance. It's more like enforcing the privilege of doing certain things (but not others) you know will get a huge social backlash from those whose interests you are acting against. If you're a woman, perhaps you should go to war if you think your society…
/r/MensRights02/08/23 08:35 PM
14

Traditionally, women also had "duties". These "duties" have been completely erased from society's moral archetype and as such women should no longer expect men's "duties". Men should expect no less than to give and receive unconditional love, desire and sexual pleasure.
/r/MensRights02/08/23 05:39 PM
15

2020's - men are no longer allowed by oppressive mainstream society to have unapologetic sexual standards/preferences and state the obvious. She is as unattractive physically and behaviourly as tub of lard.
/r/MensRights02/08/23 05:24 PM
5

Exactly the same type of excuse people used to make for wife-beaters.
/r/MensRights02/08/23 02:05 PM
4

47% of polled men are idiotic cucks
/r/MensRights28/07/23 11:44 PM
29

Because I am deeply convinced feminism is in fact the reverse of machismo. They want full control of society and micromanage every single of inch of life. Pushing for equality across the board Expressing and renormalising uncomfortable and inconvenient truths Providing a platform for male opinion, frustration, advice, interests, agendas, organisation and advocacy Liberating and decoupling male body, consciousness, instincts, value and identity from female rule ... is a DIRECT threat to their dom…
/r/MensRights28/07/23 03:35 PM
6

This is defamation using rhetorical manipulation.
/r/MensRights28/07/23 02:21 PM
36

Exactly, journalists who aren't even remotely scientists or had any form of scientific education, preaching about THE SCIENCE and purporting to be doing "research". Why isn't this called out?
/r/MensRights28/07/23 02:18 PM
5

This person should get a life sentence, work in prison to pay for her stay, lawyers, investigation, court, prosecution and compensation to her family. No inheritance for her. She should serve at least 25 years and only let out after it's certified she will never do something like this again.
/r/MensRights27/07/23 04:58 PM
17

You seem far too concerned about signaling your superior morality and intelectuality, than to actually understand what's the whole point of this thread. A man who does this to a girlfriend or wife is going to face a massive backlash from friends and family. I can also see a man being fired over this. I bet this girl got nothing but "understanding" from her enablers. Adults can do whatever they want according to the law, but they should expect backlash for bad behaviour. Just because you used to …
/r/MensRights27/07/23 04:44 PM
16

Yeah it's like we have heavy duty machines, IVF, automation and robotics you guys have served your evolutionary purpose and are no longer needed. I think men should start striking for equal rights. Men would bring countries into a halt and crash economies.
/r/MensRights27/07/23 04:22 PM
4

Families support each other. If their kids don't want to go, I think he would understand. And she married him, she had kids with him, she CHOSE him. Why is it suddenly a problem now that she is making more than him?
/r/MensRights27/07/23 12:11 PM
32

Well pointed out. Cheering for your own amateur Ben Stokes while he earns more than you is great and the children love it too.
/r/MensRights26/07/23 08:01 PM
27

Punishing your spouse by keeping him financially out of family holidays, especially at Disney, where parents and children can bond and form everlasting memories, is another level of narcissism. If she was not OK with it she should have had a frank conversation with him about finances and their lives.
/r/MensRights26/07/23 07:43 PM
27

They are married. The fact that she is even considering leaving him at home like an object because she is low-key annoyed that he spends so much on being happy and not enough on being successful is beyond me. It's like a punishment. This is unacceptable, petty, manipulative and weasely behaviour and it would never be tolerated if it came from men. The guy is toast. I believe what she is really asking is: "Should I divorce this man or would I be an immoral person?"
/r/MensRights26/07/23 07:35 PM
1

1) Men do take care of their own children. Most professional childcarers are female. 2) It's not a competition. Men do have much more strenuous jobs even controlling for physical ability.
/r/MensRights25/07/23 10:46 PM
4

You're the one who is completely missing the point and adorning it with passive-agressive snark.
/r/MensRights25/07/23 06:30 PM
2

In a country that has been ruled by a right-wing one party system for all of its existence.
/r/MensRights25/07/23 06:22 PM
1

Identity-based HR practices should be illegal
/r/MensRights25/07/23 06:13 PM
5

That's ridiculous.
/r/MensRights25/07/23 06:11 PM
3

It has... You can't be serious if you think having a shorter 23rd chromosome isn't going to have a massive statistical effect on phenotype.
/r/MensRights25/07/23 06:09 PM
4

It's all a smokescreen, including the bipartisan struggle. You either bow to the establishment group, like the Zuck did, or you get the Musk treatment. I believe the same happened with Trump (no fan btw). He was always an establishment figure despite his dreadful persona, until he rebelled against them.
/r/MensRights25/07/23 05:47 PM
-7

I know I'll get downvoted into oblivion but childcare is hard, back breaking and often dirty.
/r/MensRights25/07/23 05:36 PM
3

Again, I don't think I have been disrespectful in any shape or form. Confrontational? As much as a reddit post allows. But I do apologise if I come off strong. Solution? Quite easy. Get a critical mass of women pushing for equality on those issues and you will get legislative change. It's really the only way. If I told you that for women to solve their issues "they had to look amongst each other for change and support rather than resort to men, which is the ultimate culprit for women's 'inferior…
/r/MensRights25/07/23 05:27 PM
16

I hope Ukrainian and Russian men learn this. They are killing each other for the rich, while women are out "having fun".
/r/MensRights25/07/23 05:14 PM
20

Exactly. MSM: Elon Musk is the coolest most "progressive" Billionaire Professional class: I am a fan. I want a Tesla, Starlink and go to Mars. I am sure he is an ethical Billionaire and never went union busting. MSM: Elon Musk is a "far-right" Billionaire who believes in freedom of expression and information Professional class: How could he? Professional class: I am completely immune to propaganda, that's for the "ignorant", "backwards", "unsophisticated", "incult", "uneducated", "simpleton" Tuc…
/r/MensRights25/07/23 05:09 PM
3

What the actual fuck? Are you sane? There is no "entendre" whatsoever. I used a common metaphor to jokingly reference women's traditional roles in the past. I am sorry if it offended you, I had no intention. You, on the other hand, are spewing a common feminist talking point that men are inferior to women and that's the reason males oppressed females, which is plain misandry and conspiracy. Perhaps, if males had a present mom AND dad, male spaces growing up, male teachers, male optimised educati…
/r/MensRights25/07/23 04:25 PM
5

You do realise all founding fathers were originally well-off British subjects, right? You do realise German resistance to the Nazi regime was also was crucial for Allied victory, right? A man can also argue the same, "why should we thank women who speak up on our behalf and risk reputation damage, relationships and their career to defend fairness and justice, if they are the problem to begin with?" It negates the struggle and sheer bravery individuals face while vigorously standing for what's ri…
/r/MensRights25/07/23 03:51 PM
26

I don't think you understand. The draft is not really abolished in most constitutions, and in the event of an all out war even constitutional arrangements will likely just be ignored as countries function as military dictatorships. In fact, a lot of countries who are considered to have abolished it, actually have a form of dormant conscription, not a complete abolition. This allows countries to easily access manpower in case of a military struggle and youd have to be incredibly naive and puerile…
/r/MensRights25/07/23 03:07 PM
5

It's not condescending. I never said or suggested there was not sacrifice or struggle, but those with power always had to concede and switch sides. That's always how it worked and how it will always work. Your attempts to discredit my point by using emotionally charged words and propositions are REALLY disingenuous. Slavery only came to an end in the west by the activism of 18th century's societies and pressure groups of ethnic Europeans. Descents from slaves should be grateful to THESE people, …
/r/MensRights25/07/23 01:30 PM
11

Ridiculous... Women only got the socio-economic position you enjoy today because men with power stood by your side and granted you equal rights. If it were not for men, I am sorry, but you'd be in the kitchen today. Do you also have the same opinion with regards to ethnic inequality? Or is it just men who have to fend for themselves?
/r/MensRights25/07/23 01:07 PM
1

Not romps. Statutory rape.
/r/MensRights22/07/23 01:04 PM
2

That's a ridiculous mainstream proposition and part of the problem. For starters, not every man has the ability to "be better" and that's mostly a vague ambigous motivational daft adage from the same textbook as "be rich", "invest", "get pussy", "be successful". Like those things are the ONLY and primary concern of men. Then, It tacitily implies that justice, fairness, and rights are dependent on your socio-economic position and status, which is blatantly undemocratic and aristocratic. A two-tie…
/r/MensRights22/07/23 08:29 AM
1

Are you joking, right? Do you think men get the help they need? Especially psychiatric and psychological? Why do you think so many males are struggling nowadays, and medical therapeutic solutions barely help? Especially when these therapeutics are often incompatible with males and lead to plenty of sexual and social problems. I haven't read the study, but most of these "studies" are riddled issues and are often unrepresentative of reality. I am a man, and I have been used to medical negligence, …
/r/MensRights22/07/23 04:37 AM
7

My point still stands... One is repudiated, and the other is often celebrated... One group is vulnerable and marginalised. The other is protected by every inch of society, no matter how selfish and deranged it is. One group is defined by the media and academia as an extremist violent group and openly mocked and marginalised by society for the actions of a minority. The other is given the benefit of the fallacy of composition, like you are doing. When confronted with facts, hostile people often r…
/r/MensRights21/07/23 05:42 PM
14

The same way the media and academia report on random people on the Internet spewing dreadful things and label the whole group extremists?
/r/MensRights21/07/23 05:22 PM
7

Example? If it does exist, it exists in the darkest corners of the Internet and is condemned by everyone. This is written on reddit and widely appraised. Other explicit and implicit genocidal and marginalising ideas are commonly discussed and popularised on these forums and even on mainstream media and academia. Disingenuous false equivalency. This is a tacit acceptance of the genocide of vulnerable, ill, marginalised misfits, who are often desperate for love and attention.
/r/MensRights21/07/23 05:09 PM
72

What do you expect?... These people are radical utilitarians who believe everything is justifiable for a greater good. Defamation, Marginalisation, Murder, Genocide. Whatever it takes to purify society. You just convince yourself and others that it's the right thing to do for humanity. Sounds familiar? I mean, all those Germans had to be able to sleep at night and kiss their wives and children while doing and witnessing the unspeakable. It just goes to show how we need strong neutral laws and st…
/r/MensRights21/07/23 04:59 PM
19

Send this to every person who thinks/says feminism extremism doesn't exist and it'd not be tolerated... then ask them for evidence of misogyny and inciment to violence and genocide.
/r/MensRights21/07/23 04:48 PM
5

I think people should express themselves freely. I do not believe, however, that openly inciting castration or mutilation should be legal.
/r/MensRights21/07/23 03:53 PM
55

Castrating someone is evil and a clear violation of bodily autonomy/sovereignty. We don't even do it to paedophiles because it's as inhumane as you can be. This should actually be a crime. This person is openly inciting for an egregious crime. She even attempts to mock someone for not wanting to have his gonads mutilated. That's pure hate speech and misandry.
/r/MensRights21/07/23 03:49 PM
34

Any male actor who accepts this kind of pathetic propaganda role is no better than a 1950's housewife in a propaganda film.
/r/MensRights21/07/23 03:36 PM
7

Have you read the column? She actually labels it "misandrous"... I guess she might have been right about divorcing the slimiest snake in Westminster.
/r/MensRights21/07/23 03:24 PM
5

The role of the employer is not to enforce laws and penalise crime. That's feudalism and fascism - the private sector as an arm of the state.
/r/MensRights21/07/23 02:51 PM
3

The fact that her daughter loves it suggests the following. Modern youth culture is, indeed, misandrist and gynocentric - which explains Tate. The education system possibly encourages it explicitly and implicitly. She, as a mother, has failed to properly educate her daughter.
/r/MensRights21/07/23 02:01 PM
10

If an adult engages in sexual activity with a minor, the adult should be held responsible for any consequences of such activity. Pregnancies, STDs, physical and emotional trauma, legal costs... In the case of childbirth, the paedophile should not get the custody of the child, the victims family should. Along with full child support and alimony. If you enforce this, MOST sane adults would never ever touch an underaged person. They would find themselves in jail with a quarter of a million in debt.
/r/MensRights21/07/23 12:23 PM
2

Same mate, it hurts. It's just pure psychopathic behaviour of restricting someone's freedom and abusing someone just for personal enjoyment.
/r/MensRights21/07/23 11:57 AM
8

Go off on her twice as hard and rebuke every single thing she is claiming is the truth. Tell her you are a man and that her beyond repulsive misandrous and sexist remarks are offensive, dangerous, and defamatory. Inform her of the unfair and unequal realities that men face in every aspect of modern life, from dating to the legal system and how her insensitivity and rhetoric are not allowing for progress and a true egalitarian society. Ask her if she would be OK with a man spouting hatred for wom…
/r/MensRights20/07/23 09:20 PM
13

People who do such vile and disgusting things to their kids should not be allowed to have kids ever again.
/r/MensRights20/07/23 05:21 PM
133

Why men need men's spaces.
/r/MensRights20/07/23 05:07 PM
13

Even then, I believe doctors often rely on old outdated unscientific guidelines and shield their actions and interests with it.
/r/MensRights20/07/23 09:23 AM
-2

First, GET A JOB! You're experiencing the abuse women suffered at the hands of their abusive husbands when they weren't independent. Is there any possibility of moving to America or any other Western nation? This is awfully manipulative, but can't you entice her with a better life in America, especially a red state with shared custody and limited alimony? I don't know whether the court would have jurisdiction over your case, but I reckon it's something worth looking into. You can claim that you …
/r/MensRights20/07/23 09:10 AM
4

The issue is that you can't dissociate both. Also, people grasp for air when they have been deprived of it. People rant when there's no productive path forward Think about that.
/r/MensRights19/07/23 01:36 PM
22

When I was a kid, Ken figures actually had heroic, courageous, and "manly" roles - firefighter, policeman, diver, pilot, etc
/r/MensRights19/07/23 12:56 PM
5

At least, people are using straws for something useful instead of using them to deceive and dismiss other fellow humans, only to feel/display superiority and advance one's selfish interests.
/r/MensRights19/07/23 12:51 PM
5

I agree, but it's all part of the same problem, isn't it? Weaken men to comply with the "girl boss"
/r/MensRights19/07/23 12:05 PM
40

"Guys should totally watch and support women's sports."
/r/MensRights19/07/23 09:09 AM
101

Well, you certainly felt conflicted enough to share your concerns here. Those are your instincts. Trust them.
/r/MensRights19/07/23 05:36 AM
2

This, however, leads to other issues. The state/powerful having a monopoly on violence by selecting males who still retain these traits is incredibly dangerous and leads to top-down authoritarianism, and it's ultimately incompatible with democracy and freedom. Gun deterrence might help, but other than in the US, it's pretty much controlled by the same elites that hold the monopoly on violence. Violent men are also much more attractive to women, which leads to social issues and tension. Overall, …
/r/MensRights18/07/23 08:56 AM
3

This isn't any of those things, is it? It's simply providing a service with your body. No organs will be damaged or extracted, and you will certainly be fairly compensated for your time and effort. Pregnancies aren't easy, but getting a good salary for doing very little other than enduring discomfort is actually something I see many women going for. I certainly would. I do believe that, once again, "women's rights" groups engaged in a massive campaign to outlaw this. Feminists are notoriously ag…
/r/MensRights18/07/23 08:27 AM
2

Easy. Get one of your mates, pretend you're both in a homosexual relationship and want babies. If they reject you, threaten them with homophobic discrimination complaint. After approval, "split up" and get full custody of the child. Congratulations, you're a single daddy.
/r/MensRights18/07/23 06:08 AM
6

Why is it not legal?? They should have legalised it completely. Ukraine's GDP would get a boost. €25000 for conceiving your own child with the mother eggs you selected is great. It's far better, cheaper, and easier than dating and getting a wife.
/r/MensRights18/07/23 01:57 AM
1

This is an extremely cynical viewpoint. I think women genuinely prefer a MAN, not a boy. But they also want power, and this type of men do not concede them 1 inch of power. They want these men to be a silent minority. A fun time away from their husbands.
/r/MensRights17/07/23 12:07 PM
9

You're right, I should have written "ALL except some irrelevant species to this topic". Utterly pedantic and fallacious. Do explain what eugenics is and how "I got into eugenics territory"? And why is it "stupid"? Eugenics is stupid. Gene selection/genetic semideterminism is the biological paradigm. If you think you find someone attractive because God told you, you're a moron.
/r/MensRights17/07/23 07:34 AM
9

On what basis do you make such claims? Are you even a scientist? A real one, not a "social" one. Eugenics??? Haha. Do you understand the difference between eugenics and darwinism/evolutionary biology? Eugenics doesn't mean "good genes" FYI, it is an autoritarian political movement. Aborting a baby with trisomy is not eugenics. Gene editing/therapy is not eugenics. It's a way for people with simple or complex genetic disorders to not suffer and lead a normal, fulfilling life. You claim I don't un…
/r/MensRights17/07/23 07:25 AM
9

Mate, that "you should improve your knowledge of biology" attack is really lame, especially when you demonstrate NatGeo level of understanding of animal reproductive behaviour. What I said is true for most animals and especially mammals and primates.
/r/MensRights17/07/23 06:50 AM
16

IVF, baby! Get the best sperm donor they can find (physically, mentally and intellectually endowed), pay the price of a small plastic surgery (or in some cases/countries get it covered by the taxpayer), claim benefits as a single mom or get a hubby to foot the bill. Some are even floating the idea that sperm donors ought to be made financially responsible for their biological children. It's actually genius. You can have a baby with the genetic top 1% without attracting him or doing much at all, …
/r/MensRights17/07/23 06:39 AM
9

It is. If you want to reproduce. Females are the ultimate reproductive and evolutionary gatekeepers in ALL animal species. They instinctively decide which genes are. In recent decades, with widespread pregnancy screening and abortion, they also decide who lives and who doesn't. For instance, some countries are close to eradicating trisomy and other genetic disorders. And good kids are really the only real blood family you will ever have going forward.
/r/MensRights17/07/23 06:22 AM
45

The sheer arrogance and disdain. It's also a very mercantile way to describe oneself's body and soul. And also a titanic red flag - not wife material. Men just need to be more attractive, stronger emotionally, and completely independent. If all else fails, get a dogo. Women's power over men is mostly an ilusion, a fugazy, an ethereal abstraction. Their only real source of power is being able to carry children. Who says something so egregious as that? The Podemos lady? The one who made false alle…
/r/MensRights17/07/23 05:55 AM
2

Why do you think it's false?
/r/MensRights16/07/23 07:15 AM
7

Most of these people have the same biological literacy and scientific acumen as a dark ages druid
/r/MensRights16/07/23 04:53 AM
7

Yeah, that is why they are cranking up censorship, marginalisation, and political imprisonment.
/r/MensRights16/07/23 04:36 AM
10

It's true. However, women, nowadays, hold immense disproportionate societal moral and political power over men. Not only through vote, but also through marriage, sex appeal, education, bureaucracy, etc...
/r/MensRights16/07/23 04:34 AM
0

I have no idea, but I hope so.
/r/MensRights15/07/23 04:39 PM
5

Mate, what a gigantic pile of nonsense. I didn't remotely try to insult you. I merely criticised your ludicrous positions, and you got way too sensitive. Don't be so fragile. Now, attempting to insult me using sentence redundancy on the Internet might be one of the shittiest, most pedantic granddad insult attempts I have ever come across. All the while, you claim I need to get better at insulting. haha It's ridiculous. Take the prize and go home.
/r/MensRights15/07/23 04:16 PM
6

That's a cold, inhumane take and not very compatible with the whole men's rights movement ethos. These men aren't "dumb", it's a combination of being delusional and very lonely/needy. They ought to be helped not ostracised as "dumb". They are being exploited for their vulnerabilities as men, and that is a concern of MRA's Even if you are cynical and selfish and only care about what affects you, you should care. Living in a world where behaviour that exploits men is normalised/celebrated will eve…
/r/MensRights15/07/23 03:28 PM
6

The normalisation of this excuse has been going on for ages, apparently. I used to watch reruns of this old awesome 80s TV sitcom "Who's the Boss" with my parents as a kid. In one of the episodes, the main character finds out her mother, grandma Mona, cheated on her then late father when she was a child. She gets mad but eventually forgives her mother after Mona explained to her that her father knew about it and forgave her, mainly because she cheated due to being lonely and her father working l…
/r/MensRights15/07/23 03:04 PM
1

From the same creators of "If you don't like being poor, then be rich." Yeah, like no man has ever entertained those ideas, only to think " fuck that's a pipedream".
/r/MensRights15/07/23 02:49 PM
27

Weak biased defamation laws. Defamation ought to be a crime, and the burden of proof should rest on the defendant. Manipulation, fraud, defamation/smear, harassment, marginalisation, and incitement are all hallmarks of female criminal behaviour and should be prosecuted as is male criminal behaviour.
/r/MensRights15/07/23 02:40 PM
4

Yeah, she's just like Pearl. It's a con to get vulnerable, gullible men entertained while not actually doing something meaningful. It's just acting and complaining about nonsense that WILL NEVER change. It's not about changing marriage/divorce and custody laws; stopping legal, labour, and academic discrimination; criminalising female agressive/violent behaviour; solving male reproductive inequalities.
/r/MensRights15/07/23 02:29 PM
5

Is there any credible proven basis for these assertions? I am not discrediting you or engaging in sophistry, just curious.
/r/MensRights15/07/23 01:43 PM
-5

If the only symptom they get can be easily mistaken for stomach movements, I think it's reasonable to ignore it. 99% of doctors certainly would.
/r/MensRights15/07/23 01:34 PM
-14

Well, it's an established albeit rare medical/obstetric occurrence, I don't know what else to tell you. Besides, women might associate the kicks with other things and ignore it, if they aren't conditioned to associate that with a baby.
/r/MensRights15/07/23 01:06 PM
-29

Yeah, mate, I meant women who are not supid. I have heard recently of a girl who was infertile (no period), had unprotected sex in a one night stand, and barely had any pregnancy symptoms, just a slightly bigger belly.
/r/MensRights15/07/23 12:46 PM
21

Some women genuinely don't know until delivery. Look it up. It's rare, but it happens.
/r/MensRights15/07/23 12:34 PM
5

It's not cheap, easy, and it's likely you get a negative decision
/r/MensRights15/07/23 12:21 PM
14

And take the most important people in the world to you, your children.
/r/MensRights15/07/23 12:19 PM
7

If only there was an international pressure group/movement to reform these laws across the "west" and bring marriage to the 21th century. Women live in 2023, Men live in 1953.
/r/MensRights15/07/23 12:15 PM
1

I think they know, even if subconsciously. They don't care, and it conflicts directly with their belief system and agenda. Typically, they only start to care when they get baby boys. I am hoping that someone prominent drops an inconvenient truth bomb: Most men are only motivated by women's attention, affection, validation, and a strong united family. Take this away, and you get slobs. They don't really care about material wealth and power.
/r/MensRights15/07/23 10:55 AM
8

Exactly, when women were still culturally, legally attached to their husbands, and men usually left them for other women, they ended up homeless, jobless with children. That's no longer the case.
/r/MensRights15/07/23 10:26 AM
4

Same here. In some cases, they might be right, though. But you should always talk, not cheat.
/r/MensRights15/07/23 10:07 AM
9

She didn't give him children. She gestated THEIR children for 9 months. The children aren't hers to start with. She sacrificed herself, bringing her children up? Are children a sacrifice? What about the man who sacrificed a lot of family time, growing his own children and his wellbeing to be the sole provider of a family? Was he asked about what his preferences? Did he realistically get a say on the matter? What compensation does he get for his sacrifice? A broken heart, shattered confidence, de…
/r/MensRights15/07/23 10:04 AM
7

What if you want children like most men? That's the core issue... If that could be solved, then no sane man would ever marry again.
/r/MensRights15/07/23 08:57 AM
-16

The issue with this "solution" is the children who have absolutely no fault and would be clearly the ultimate victims of the court system, their mother's infidelity, and the whole situation. Mommy and Daddy chose to have them. They didn't choose to be born and suffer the consequences.
/r/MensRights15/07/23 08:46 AM
27

The number one go-to fallacy for feminists against alimony and child-support reform is usually "men are trash, they only care about their money, not the wellbeing of children." Yet, when the tables are turned, they argue that raising children was a sacrifice and they should be financially compensated for it. It was also a sacrifice for the man to forgo spending time, raising his children, and ultimately creating a strong everlasting bond with his offspring. It's a sacrifice that can not be compe…
/r/MensRights15/07/23 08:33 AM
42

Cheating on your spouse is appalling, imoral, and can destroy the other person. Especially a man. Cheating on your spouse while he is working 80h a week under extreme pressure to provide a safe and comfortable life for his family, as a sole provider, is COLD.
/r/MensRights15/07/23 07:35 AM
16

People in "left-liberal" circles seem to understand everything through the lenses of "power relations" Facts and values/principles don't really matter because they argue it's just a smokescreen for a crusade against their agenda, which they arrogantly assert it's the unequivocal right, moral one. What matters is the perceived motivation and the character of the speaker, not the intrinsic ethical value of the message. One must always ask: if your thesis is true for your opponents, why isn't it tr…
/r/MensRights15/07/23 07:00 AM
2

Back in middle school, not in the US, I got into countless physical fights to deal with bullies. Not once did I or the bullies get in trouble. No one cares. No one wants to deal with it. No one knows how to deal with it. This happens in a female dominated environment that pledges to be inclusive and compassionate. Like 95% of staff are females. It's a moral jungle. It's Darwin's survival of the fittest. The whole class and school become dominated by gangs who assert their power and influence on …
/r/MensRights15/07/23 04:37 AM
9

Quick story: When I was thirteen, a girl (ugly and smelly) was attempting to verbaly bully me. and as I was very vulnerable at that time due to personal and health problems, I initially shrugged it off and ignored her, as I had already too much on my plate to deal with mentally and emotionally. Eventually, I got really tired of it and dropped a massive mercyless bomb on her. Later, after the initial shock and drama, she became very friendly to me and never again disrespected me. Never. Take. Abu…
/r/MensRights15/07/23 04:05 AM
3

I think he meant "for society" not "for women". We should be very careful with generalisations and stereotyping, but to reject and censor trends and biases is just sophistry.
/r/MensRights15/07/23 03:48 AM
37

Any form of harassment that deals with ones sexuality should not only be considered moral harassment but also sexual harassment. Sexual harassment should also include sexual and erotic shaming.
/r/MensRights14/07/23 04:47 PM
5

I'm not saying it's right, but plenty of women are doing the same. Meet a guy, and make him give up on a lot of things he enjoys for the privilege of being with me. Placing boundaries on friendships with other men, I think, is completely normal and expected.
/r/MensRights14/07/23 04:39 PM
2

My point still stands...
/r/MensRights14/07/23 12:18 PM
2

This is bloody awful. Pseudoliterary rubbish riddled with daft metaphors alluding to militaristic revanchism and physical and sexual gendered violence. I would ask you to report this... but then again, the college administration will likely just ignore it or even investigate you for hate speech. Send this to conservative activists, journalists, pundits, or MSM.
/r/MensRights14/07/23 12:15 PM
2

Yeah, the tribal women of Eastern Siberia are great... and the tribal men are TOTALLY ok with passport bros' competition.
/r/MensRights14/07/23 11:35 AM
11

Not all women, though. We shouldn't generalise like those misandrous twats. The woman who wrote this seems to be perfectly eloquent, reasonable, respectful, ethical, logical, and egalitarian.
/r/MensRights14/07/23 11:08 AM
1

Feminist jurisprudence is derived from concepts of Marxist jurisprudence. Google it. It's spooky. It doesn't matter who committed a crime, but who is considered the "oppressor." in a sham trial. In 20th century communist regimes, the oppressors used to be the aristocracy and the landed gentry. Nowadays, it has been extended to gender, race, and sexuality. Theoretically, being a man, ethnic European and heterosexual can send you to the gulag in a blink of an eye.
/r/MensRights14/07/23 10:10 AM
22

This female columnist expresses that beautifully... 1) Relationships are about compromise and mutual behavioural restraint 2) Women should also establish boundaries for the behaviour of their partners with other women
/r/MensRights14/07/23 08:36 AM
28

Cut off these people from your life. Hopefully, they weren't your family. They aren't your friends. There are no excuses for this type of behaviour on your ex-wife and "best friends" part. Things only really happen if you aren't fully committed to someone. I have had GFs and wives of friends flirting and slightly coming onto me, and I simply de-escalate the situation, even if I could, otherwise, be interested in getting with them. Usually, some fucker isn't as disciplined and ethical as I try to…
/r/MensRights14/07/23 07:32 AM
11

Sources for your assertions? You have a completely fictional, ideological, and revisionist view of society, civilization, and history. Utter lunacy. We are the ones finally figuring out that we live in a matriarchal society that oppresses men's sexuality, behaviours, political agendas, academic/professional success, and legal protections. A society that treats men as disposable servile objects and mocks/belittles the vulnerable ones. Feminists sold females and males an egalitarian society but in…
/r/MensRights14/07/23 06:32 AM
1

Yeah, because single moms fare so well that they have to get into relationships with the shittiest of men for sex or literally throw themselves at men for attention. I can promise that men don't need misandrous women like yourself. In fact, the poor guy you will marry will fare much better without you... so if you actually care for him, convince him not to marry you.
/r/MensRights14/07/23 06:03 AM
0

It's the tone, man. It's the tone. And your constant and incessant search for new irrelevant and illogical gotchas reeking of moral harassment.
/r/MensRights14/07/23 05:16 AM
1

Start by explaining to her how misandrous that belief "women can do everything men can and better." is and how it implicitly reinforces the concept of male disposability. Ask if she would be OK with men claiming "men can do everything women can, but better"? Would she be comfortable that such beliefs become normalised and part of the mainstream assumptions? How would she react to such "male disposability arguments" if she had a baby boy? Or even a son who is struggling in life. How would she rea…
/r/MensRights14/07/23 05:12 AM
1

No, they can't. That's sexist and supremacist. A society is impossible to maintain without men. Both are equally needed.
/r/MensRights11/07/23 01:19 AM
1

Theoretically, we can generate both males and females. They can only generate females.
/r/MensRights10/07/23 05:02 AM
1

I generally agree... I suppose any neutral reasonable observer agrees as well. The problem lies in that these sorts of boundaries are HARDLY accepted for men, and any man willing to draw such boundaries is always risking getting absolutely ravaged online and having his career destroyed, EVEN if he doesn't engage in the same sort of manipulative behaviour as Jonah did. At the same time, these boundaries are not only very commonly set by women and enforced through sex and affection privation, they…
/r/MensRights09/07/23 02:12 PM
1

I am certainly not excusing it, nor am I engaging in mental gymnastics. I don't think women having similar boundaries is bad. Most women don't want their boyfriends going to places where they can misbehave, cheat, or simply get attention from women, and I think that's normal. After all, you want your partner to be 100% committed. The problem lies in the manipulation and abuse in the relationship - the mentality of "you either do what I want or else" while never really doing anything.
/r/MensRights09/07/23 01:58 PM
6

Men, we ALL, including the weasels, must unite to have the right to universal access to surrogacy and eggs from a bank where we can freely choose.
/r/MensRights09/07/23 11:37 AM
3

Let's stop quoting that man, please. I think it is rather harmful to the whole "men's rights" endeavour, and no matter how right he, perhaps, is on some issues, he is still very much a grifter who is hurting the whole movement. It just keeps other men and women away from this by constantly giving hostile individuals and groups a "causus belis" for defamatory and slanderous hit pieces.
/r/MensRights09/07/23 10:16 AM
2

So women can be controlling, guys can't. Women can have insecurities, guys can't. If for every conceded controlling demand a woman has ever made to a man, a person would die, we would all be extinct. What are men exactly? Sexual objects? Personal therapists? Validation objects? Companions? Daddys? Financial support? Protectors?
/r/MensRights09/07/23 09:32 AM
3

Is that sarcasm? If you think it's reasonable that a woman asks a man the same things, but not the other way around, you're a moron.
/r/MensRights09/07/23 06:59 AM
1

Yeah, the whole thing about "taking responsibility", "work ethic", "be patriotic" is just as toxic to men. Fuck that. The only thing men must protect is their interests, loved ones, and THEIR children.
/r/MensRights09/07/23 06:55 AM
11

What about when women ask men to stop going to clubs and bars seeing female friends hanging out with womanisers maintain relationships with exes talking to that hot colleague posting certain content or pics supporting some cause/party/personality following someone on social media (...) Oh, and bear in mind that women usually use tantrums and sexual and emotional manipulation to force men into compliance on these issues. I saw the other messages, and the dude is definitely on the wrong... not bec…
/r/MensRights09/07/23 06:22 AM
3

A bit... but change "men" for "women" and see if it still does seem off or if it seems reasonable.
/r/MensRights09/07/23 05:28 AM
1

Irrelevant...
/r/MensRights09/07/23 04:40 AM
5

Men need strong role models... That's why superheroes are insanely popular among nerdy geeky boys who have strained or absent fathers and shitty social lives. If you remove that, you get Andrew Tate... I believe this is a war on boys, men, and masculinity. And the most vulnerable ones are suffering.
/r/MensRights09/07/23 04:28 AM
3

The companies do not go broke, mate! We are living in international fascist oligarchy. Corporations control everything through a top-bottom cartel, and they have the complete backing of the state... If they have financial problems, they just "lobby" for corporate welfare. That is why the whole target and bud light thing is insanely entertaining.
/r/MensRights09/07/23 01:33 AM
15

It is not being a brainless fuck. It is pure sophistry to manipulate weak people into rhetorical submission. A society is made of reasonably equal legal and social norms. Selective equality is not equality, it is privilege.
/r/MensRights09/07/23 12:50 AM
39

He is, he is setting boundaries for which he is comfortable to be in a relationship... How come is this any different from women not wanting their men to have female friends, to hang out in clubs and bars, to have friendships with exes, to hang out with cheaters etc. Men do it, they are control freaks, women do it, they are only setting boundaries. Most women set these boundaries early on and enforce it through bullying and sexual and emotional manipulation (celibacy and silence treatment). If y…
/r/MensRights09/07/23 12:23 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter