TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Ill_Requirement3366 Archive

View 0 posts and 320 comments by Ill_Requirement3366 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-1

And then everyone clapped
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/25 04:51 PM
1

I didn't say it was some plot and I explained the exact mechanism, below replacement level birth rates. Slow down, take a breath, and read.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/25 07:07 PM
1

18 is an adult. You're the only person who mentioned child brides. Society cannot survive with below replacement rate reproduction Women are the only ones who can have kids. Now all of these are facts. Please explain to me where the hate is. If I did not hate women I would not recognize these facts? Or would I simply not care?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/25 06:58 PM
1

I hate women so I want them to take the route which would best guarantee them maximum marital happiness? You've started from they're irrational idea that I hate women which is supported by literally nothing I've said, and worked to try to find a way to make what im saying fit your preconceived conclusions. That's why nothing you've said actually makes any sense in terms of addressing my point. You're trying to prove your right about me hating women instead of actually engaging on the topic.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/25 06:49 PM
1

You don't seem to have the capacity to follow what I'm saying
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/25 06:41 PM
1

Again, why does the exact number matter? The only Point is to create societal pressure to marry young and have kids not the exact age.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/25 06:16 PM
1

How's that? Let's say i claimed it was the 60s, how does that alter our conversation in the slightest? You keep attempting to take us on irrelevant detours
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/25 05:50 PM
1

Exactly when is irrelevant
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/25 05:14 PM
1

We used to have replacement rate when people married fresh out of high school. Now we do not. Exactly when that stopped is irrelevant
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/25 05:06 PM
1

Weve addressed this
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/25 05:00 PM
1

Yes now can we get back to the conversation?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/25 04:53 PM
1

You said they were in a rush with no proof I said they weren't with the same amount of proof. Predictability in terms of literally every facet. Any woman you see is married every man you see is married every child has two parents in the home etc. Youre using circular logic.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/25 03:42 PM
1

Yes I married young can we return to the conversation now?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/25 02:58 PM
1

No it's stability in terms of predictability. Everyone wasn't in such a rush at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/25 02:55 PM
1

There are no stats which indicates that most or many men were unfaithful
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/25 02:54 PM
1

We cannot wait for perfection or people will suffer. You still have not shown me that society is ending in the first place or that women are the cause. You don't understand the concept of replacement rate then. Let's put it very simply. Let's say there's 10 people. They couple up so they have 5 couples. All those couples only have one baby. When the 10 parents die there's only five people left. They pair up, so two couples and one lonely guy or girl. Each couple has 1 child. The parents die, now…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/25 05:59 AM
0

We need some amount of replacement, it doesn't need to be exactly 1 to 1 always at all times forever. We can back off for a while. No reason to think it'll be to extinction. There's no reason to think the trend will reverse. Reduction is fine. Rebalancing happens, hell it's even natural. Many elderly and sick will suffer if not enough people pay taxes and Social Security. Maybe your fine with that, but honestly it seems like you're fine with any amount of suffering as long as women don't have to…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/25 05:54 AM
1

Women do not owe continuing society to society? Correct Yes that's my point. You've proved my point. Women wouldn't rather society end then do literally anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/25 04:41 AM
-1

Please address one point at a time this whole you write a novel for every point i make so I have to address 15 points per response is not going to work. Nobody is not reproducing due to climate change. Even most of the people who aren't choosing to reproduce aren't saying this. We do not need everyone to reproduce to keep the human race afloat. We need replacement rate. If we don't reach replacement rate the human race will die in x amount of generations. Asking not to be judged for choosing not…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/25 04:34 AM
1

... But we need kids and you would need to have like, all three kids within nine months of each other to not be in the danger zone for autism and other issues with the kids at that age. Regardless, spending the time from 20 to 30 squatting on every hawt cawk in a 100 mile radius creates instability in partners. The stats are clear, marital happiness is highest and likelihood of cheating and divorce are lowest when you marry your first sexual partner, this is especially true for women. So unless …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/25 03:39 AM
1

Young marriage creates social cohesion through stability. Everyone is married. Child all have two parents. Parents get together with other parents to do parent things and at events for the children, a defacto social circle where everyone has things in common. The greatest indicator of poverty and criminality in children is being the child of a single mother. Lower crime, higher education, lower poverty etc. All of these things are good for society
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/25 01:28 AM
0

You're not making sense. You think women are not reproducing due to the fears of climate change? That's absurd. Do you think they should not have children due to climate change? So the human race should end. What makes you think that this "demand" is so they can have casual sex, rather than for more through getting and/or getting established in their adult life or a million other reasons? The free love movement is what effectively ended the social expectation for marriage the movement was women …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/25 12:45 AM
1

I've already pointed out exactly when is irrelevant. And this isn't about me but what is necessary for society to exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/25 12:42 AM
1

It exactly addressed your argument by pointing out how your logic is wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/25 12:41 AM
1

The more children women have the longer they live. Women do not owe their fertile years to society, nor do they owe society jumping into a contract that you yourself think should be life-long at such a young age. Women do not owe continuing society to society? It's entirely unnecessary for women to get married so young, and your real issue is that couples are not choosing to have as many children as you wish they would. And again I say that they do not owe that to a society that doesn't make tha…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/25 12:39 AM
1

I specified that I didn't say anything about children. Why do you keep suggesting i am?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/25 11:39 PM
1

No that's not how things work. Very simple logic. Marrying at or near 18 and for life creates social cohesion. Marrying that young also maximizes fertile years in a stable relationship meaning a longer time where couples are able to produce children hence more children being born. Those two things are necessary for civilizations survival, at least in its current state. You need social cohesion, and you need to have replacement rate at least of children being born
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/25 11:29 PM
1

Why would it matter if it was the 20s the 40s the 70s or whenever?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/25 11:23 PM
1

Why does that matter?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/25 11:08 PM
-1

I didn't say anything about child marriage please quote me. I said "young" marriage meaning 18 years old to early 20s being the norm for marriage.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/25 10:47 PM
-2

Who said anything about children being forced to marry adults?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/25 10:19 PM
-4

Women demanding the end of young marriage so they can ride the carousel is contributing to a population decline which is below replacement rate which means if nothing changes, we will eventually die out as we do not produce enough offspring. Eventually we will be outbred by a society which does not believe in women's rights or civilization will implode entirely. What consequences of having casual sex are women trying to avoid? Women not having casual sex isn't the problem. The problem is they ar…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/25 09:45 PM

They don't say they wanted me for my body, they say he used me. Why did you take what OP is talking about (a specific phrase) replace it with another phrase and then act like that is the topic?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/25 08:52 PM
-5

If women's sexuality is contributing to the end of civilization it is wrong, at least from the point of view that civilization as we know it is good. It seems that women simply think society should crumble if they can't ride the cock carousel without any consequences.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/25 08:50 PM

Yes they are attracted to very attractive women. They are also attracted to normal women. Men aren't women
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/25 05:06 AM

There's plenty of guys who would love to date you. Just be pleasant and make his life easier.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/25 03:51 AM
2

If it takes her a horse cock dildo? No thanks
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 04:04 AM
1

No. Feelings over facts will never lead to positive outcomes.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 03:24 AM
1

What lol? Are you really suggesting that we should discount statistics in favor of our feelings?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 03:08 AM
1

A woman (or man) who experimented in their young adulthood enough to realize casual sex wasn't great and they want and are ready for commitment because Statistically speaking that's not true. I understand your logic and it sounds good on paper but it's just not true.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 02:41 AM
2

X amount of women can cum from piv so it seems to me the rest of women need to get to work.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 01:12 AM
1

Did you tell them to quit masturbating and exercise and stop watching porn and reading smut
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 12:45 AM
2

So they should try doing things to make it work, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/25 11:47 PM

So women would rather be single then put in any effort and that's men's fault because...?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/25 11:22 PM
1

Correct. No need.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/25 11:21 PM
0

If she can do it in many ways no need for plastic
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/25 11:13 PM

Looks like women should get to work then.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/25 11:12 PM

So if men can't cum, quit watching porn work out no more masturbating. Women need to do nothing?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/25 11:06 PM
1

Statistically speaking, the attitude you have is not compatible with a happy marriage. Maybe you're an exception, but it's really not a great strategy. If you cared about marriage sleeping with a ton of guys is incompatible.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/25 10:51 PM
-1

If she can't get off without plastic surely it's a her problem, that she needs to work out, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/25 10:41 PM
12

Would it be hot if your man thought you were too loose to orgasm and asked for a pocket pussy?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/25 09:28 PM
0

What lol why do you think that men would find pleasure in watching their woman being pleased by a member larger than their own? Woman truly don't understand men at all
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/25 09:27 PM
1

Being a leader doesn't mean the ability to do whatever you want, it means leading.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/25 08:54 PM
1

Or she could just value being a good wife and mother. I know it's insane to think of a woman not being constantly and exclusively concerned with orgasms and different shapes and sizes of dicks, crazy right?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/25 08:53 PM
1

He's not a leader if he's doing that
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/25 07:26 PM
1

No it doesn't. Literally not at all. It means follow their lead. Be supportive. Let the man be the leader. Not to put up with abuse.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/25 07:18 PM
1

Yes for both actually
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/25 07:15 PM
1

I don't agree. Be submissive doesn't mean put up with abuse.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/25 07:14 PM
2

Your fantasies here are both absurd and irrelevant. Statistics don't lie.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/25 07:14 PM
1

Yeah obviously nobody is suggesting she deal with that just not be a constantly argumentative slutty bitch
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/25 06:41 PM
1

Why is it a given that he will cheat?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/25 06:02 PM
1

I'm using your argument style silly. You're the one going to the extremes. The lower the previous partner count the higher reported happiness in marriage
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/25 05:53 PM
2

Where did the thing say she couldn't pursue other interests as well? Good dads see their daughters as something more than vessels or some other man's seed. Children aren't men's seeds that's a sexist and outdated point of view. But being a good mother is a valid life choice and doesn't diminish a woman at all. Wage slaving isn't half as glorious as you seem to think, let alone somehow more important and valid to being a good mother to her own children. Just absurd.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/25 05:26 PM
1

No it's not. A woman who decides not to squat on every cock in a hundred mile radius isn't in any danger, in fact they are in much less danger.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/25 05:24 PM
2

We are talking about modern western society and how women behave in it. Not previous societies.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/25 05:22 PM
2

Cool that's irrelevant
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/25 05:10 PM
4

What if I told you that less sex partners leads to higher relationship stability and happiness?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/25 05:06 PM
2

Meaningless.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/25 05:02 PM
2

As opposed to what? A slut who is argumentative and eager to divorce if she ever married at all?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/25 05:02 PM
1

In what way?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/25 04:45 PM
0

Yeah really weird
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/25 04:41 PM
3

Who said anything about abuse?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/25 04:22 PM
-3

As a father you described my hopes for my daughter.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/25 03:20 PM

Real concepts you don't like are real regardless
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/25 12:03 AM
3

This is simply conformation bias
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/25 05:43 AM
0

Complaints aren't about real things by default though and I don't think it's reasonable to project your experiences like you're doing.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/25 08:01 PM
1

I'm not sure what this means
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/25 07:35 PM
3

Speaking of communication: Not thinking someone’s repeatedly complaints is an enough to warrant change of any kind, Do you believe complaints are valid and good simply because they are voiced? Why is it that men complain about ultimatums their complaint deserves to be ignored then? What about when men say women complain too much, women should hear that and change right?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/25 04:06 PM
2

Why would I address "women only want to jump on the cock carousel and jump on chads dick?" I didn't ask you that. The point was that women need to be responsible remember?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/25 12:17 AM
1

You didn't really address anything i said
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/25 12:11 AM
0

You're not making sense. The choice here is for women to act responsibly without being oppressed or their children won't enjoy the same rights as them. They will be outbred by patriarchal society. You think they are just going to smile while their daughters are treated as property and say "it was worth it so I could ride the cock carousel and squat on Chad dick"? Or do you think only once the true ramifications are felt they will have an ounce of regret? I actually don't think humanity deserves …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/25 11:11 PM
1

I don't really think it matters that you think, morally, women should have always had the power they currently have. The fact is that they didn't, and wouldn't if it weren't for men, and perhaps shouldn't if they choose to act like spoiled children instead of using the power responsibly.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/25 11:07 PM
5

And then they will be replaced as well. Now, if we don't want the freedoms America offers to not be enjoyed by our descendants, we need women to step up. They have great power in our society as given to them by men. With great power comes great responsibility. But they take no responsibility. They have taken all the benefits without any consideration that just because you can doesn't mean you should.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/25 07:57 PM
1

Micro vs macro
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/25 03:28 PM
2

I'm sure there are exceptions but in general men simply don't likely female stand up comedians where women seem to like both.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/25 01:59 PM
-3

Women seem to like men's humor but men don't seem to like women's
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/25 01:45 PM

They are schemers not planners there's a significant difference. Schemers break things, lie in relationships, hurt people etc in order to get the things they want. Planners create.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/25 04:29 AM
1

Must women don't want to go get donated sperm
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/25 03:38 PM
3

It's relevant because they are more likely to give men advice which will benefit or make women look good
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/25 03:36 PM
1

No. The human race shouldn't die so that women can be fickle
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/25 03:35 PM
4

Women don't have good advice for men, they can't Its a combination of their inability to sympathize with men, their in group bias, and their abundance with options for dating. They end up like a person who grew up with rich parents telling people who didn't how to be wealthy
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/25 08:59 AM
0

The human race will die if men get as picky as women
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/25 08:50 AM
1

I'm not sure what you mean, that if someone is on anti depressants they are by definition healthier than someone who isn't? Iirc 1/3rd of women are on some kind of anti psychotic.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/25 03:32 AM
1

The other commenter already did the math for you. Can you admit the truth now?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/25 11:24 PM
2

Unfortunately you don't get to universally decide what is irrelevant. I know you probably can just shriek what you want and think and most of the time people will just bow down. I wont. I think it's perfectly reasonable to assess the relative danger posed from men and bears in general when talking about deaths caused per year which is the topic. You're moving the goalposts. I'm not playing your game. Now. What do you stand to lose if you just admit more women would die if men were replaced by be…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/25 10:26 PM
5

Women get treatment? Still self report lower happiness and attempt suicide more often. How is "treatment" helping?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/25 10:21 PM
2

Yeah you won't answer because you know the answer. We both do. This is why women and men can't see eye to eye on this. Men ask a simple question and women can't answer
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/25 10:04 PM
2

K cool guess Im wrong and you're right. Answer now.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/25 10:01 PM
10

Men don't want to be happy? That's absurd. In fact men self report higher happiness than women. That shows you how tough men really are. They are killing themselves at multiple times the rate of women yet still self report higher happiness. Because men get so little they are happy with nothing. Whereas women are unhappy no matter what men or society do.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/25 10:00 PM
3

Just answer please.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/25 09:57 PM
14

So men need to fix society for men and men also need to fix society for women
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/25 09:56 PM
1

Men quite literally can't create kids lmfao.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/25 09:45 PM
3

You didn't answer I see. How do you think it would go if you replaced all the men in a large city like new York with bears? More or less women dead?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/25 09:26 PM
3

I think to accurately compare the danger, we'd have to replace all men in a city with bears without warning. How do you think that would go?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/25 07:20 PM
5

Yes but you leave out exposure. Women are around men more often than bears to an incredible degree
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/25 02:11 PM
3

I said deduced logically. If she actually thinks "he has chest hair this makes him a masculine man and therefore an ideal potential mate" then it was decided logically. If it's just no thoughts but reacting to monkey brain it was not deduced logically
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/25 07:57 PM
2

I certainly don't automatically go "monkey brain say no lust" and move forward without a second thought.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/25 07:47 PM
2

I think that which is deduced by logical thought is not instinct.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/25 07:45 PM
6

You tell me.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/25 05:21 PM
1

I believe that to be false. Humans can figure out particle physics etc that is so far beyond a chimp as to be unrecognizable.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/25 05:07 PM
8

I didn't say anything about not fitting into the system. Now, I am not the one claiming I'm a slave to my animal instincts
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/25 05:06 PM
7

"If the lust isn't there..." It baffles me when women say things like this. Are women simply monkeys without hair?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/25 04:07 PM
1

Yes we are here on the basketball court (post) trying to engage in the point of the basketball court (post) playing basketball (addressing the hypothetical OP poses). Then you come on the court (post) shit your pants (disrupt by not engaging) and kick the ball over the fence and claim anyone who calls you on it is the one with the problem. Glad we agree.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/25 07:28 PM
1

Yes and people on the basketball court trying to play basketball don't like it when people kick the ball over the fence. It isn't about them wanting you to do what they want, they just don't understand why you'd come on the basketball court and shit your pants on it. The basketball court is for playing basketball. If you don't want to play basketball, nobody is forcing you to play in a way you don't want. Just stay off the court and don't wipe your diarrhea pants shit on the ball.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/25 06:38 PM
2

This isn't about what I want. The thread poses a hypothetical. Participate or don't. Live and you learn. You'll get there. This isn't about playing the way anyone wants. What you're doing is coming up to a basketball court and turning around and kicking the ball into the woods over the fence. Then being condescending to the people who wanted to play basketball, telling them they need to learn that others don't want to play like them. Absurd.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/25 06:26 PM
0

You aren't obligated to participate in the thread at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/25 05:01 PM
0

If you don't want to participate in the prompt of the post why get on the thread at all LMFAO
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/25 04:24 PM
0

Why lol
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/25 04:09 PM
-2

Can't we speak of things as hypotheticals?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/25 03:07 PM
2

They seem to. This isn't to say I support they they do. Just they they objectively seem to
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/25 01:55 AM
2

How? Quote me.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/25 03:26 PM
2

I didn't offer any support.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/25 03:22 PM
3

I don't really see your point
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/25 03:10 PM
4

I don't really care.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/25 02:59 PM
9

I don't support them but I understand why they don't change their ways. Why would they when they are getting positive results
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/25 02:55 PM
7

But it's getting them positive results.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/25 02:50 PM
0

They definitely do though
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/25 12:35 AM
21

Sex is about attraction. Women talk about how they fuck men who are hot they they wouldn't date
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/25 10:42 PM
8

Yes but they want dating and sex. They wouldn't accept just dating without sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/25 10:42 PM
0

They don't know which men are bad though? So they kinda make assumptions for the benefit of women. Which is fine, but they can't really pretend they are caring for everyone equally.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/25 04:24 AM
-4

You claimed they protect women from men who are trying to hit on them. This implies favoritism as men have a want in this situation but women don't care about men's wants.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/25 05:27 PM
-3

Kind women by your reckoning do not care about men
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/25 02:26 PM
0

The only way you could establish a preference is if they spend equal amounts of time with both
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/25 09:17 PM
-2

It doesn't because correlation doesn't equal causation. They happen to date people who they meet.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/25 06:37 PM
-1

People do that by virtue of the fact that this is who they are exposed to. It does not indicate a preference
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/25 06:15 PM
4

Who is the only one to find what he claimed and happened to need to sell a book
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/25 12:44 PM
-10

Women seem chronically unable to be happy generally speaking
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/25 12:41 PM
1

How do you know lol
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 08:11 PM
-1

The double standard is when women claim they want a man in therapy but are actively turned off by a man in therapy
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 07:44 PM
-6

Women double standards!? No. That's impossible. The problem is with you obviously
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 05:58 PM

Women don't even understand women
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/25 02:14 AM
1

You never named any positive qualities or distribution of effort or resources that would make the woman put up with working and doing more household labor. I didn't agree that she was doing more labor to begin with. She's not doing any significant labor that she wouldn't do for herself. And you yourself said it doesn't make women horny or attracted to men for them to clean. So it's not a real issue.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/25 08:18 PM
2

You jut said this man doesn't do dishes or help around the house. No i didn't i said that shit doesn't matter. Yes he does need to be super above average to compensate for this. Why on earth would women be working and cooking and picking up after a man who has nothing exceptional about them. They aren't picking up after him. They are cleaning their house. Throwing a few extra clothes in the washer and a few extra dishes in the dishwasher is not the heroic task you're making it out to be. Wanting…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/25 06:08 PM
1

If a woman is already doing all that, the man isn't adding anything. Putting a few more dishes in the dishwasher? Oh lawd nooo!!! Again, when a woman already dislikes a man this is when this becomes an issue. This is men’s version of wanting to be treated like a fairy princess. For his lady to enjoy being around him is equivalent to wanting to be treated like a fairy princess? No. That's absurd. Also what are you doing to be so fun to be around? Are you super hot? Super interesting? Super funny?…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/25 05:38 PM
1

The tangible value is you enjoy each other's company. Lmfao
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/25 04:55 PM
11

This is not a real issue, it's feminist victim porn propaganda. Women only complain about this shit when they aren't attracted to their spouse. No amount of doing the dishes or cleaning is going to be the difference between the woman wanting to stay with a man or not.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/25 03:50 PM
5

Why would they stop having sex and then divorce their husband? Men are not suggesting women do that. They are suggesting women actually love their husbands. Shocker i know Look up the percentage of men vs women who reproduced in the past. Something like 50-70% of men didn’t reproduce at all for most of history. This is the model on which the human species has evolved Appeal to nature fallacy is a bad argument because, follow me here, in bygone eras things like rape and murder were rampant. The p…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/25 03:42 PM
12

Cut the bullshit. Be reasonable. The fate of literally the entire human race might depend on you being reasonable. Men will run into burning buildings and die on foreign shores to save others. Women can't be arsed to lower their standards one fucking iota? Absolutely absurd.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/25 03:05 PM
9

The problem is on the macro scale. Which is why I used the price fixing analogy.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/25 02:43 PM
16

Exactly.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/25 08:25 AM
13

They are too short sighted to care.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/25 08:24 AM
36

What women are effectively doing is like price fixing. They are all raising their standards so men who want the product just have to make do. You can't go to the competition because they have also raised their prices (standards) which has resulted in what is basically inflation to an absurd degree which usually ends up with a market collapse at some point. 2s hold out for 5s. 5s for 7s or 8s. Girls who are 8s want 10s. So you will see a lot of 8s with 10s. Women who are 10s want the entire packa…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/25 05:23 AM
3

They earned those benefits? I don't see the analogy
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/25 06:03 PM

None of this really addresses the point. You're referencing the halo effect and then studies which show that behavior can have an effect on attractiveness. Neither of those are the point. Such positive reinforcement can encourage prosocial behavior rather than entitlement or cruelty. Oh it can? How convincing. has also indicated that individuals who perceive themselves as attractive are more likely to engage in altruistic behavior. A study published in Scientific Reports found that a “beauty gro…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/25 04:36 PM

You've provided no research. And I've actually referenced actual research which specifically does contradict what you're saying
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/25 03:41 PM

Social power is still power.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/25 03:26 PM

I think that's the halo effect talking. It's not that they are actually more charming, it's that they are good looking so everything they do is viewed in a better light
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/25 03:01 PM

What research?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/25 03:00 PM

The reams of research which are where?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/25 02:59 PM

Power corrupts is a proven paradigm across the board with humans. Look up the prison experiment.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/25 02:58 PM
1

We must assume that as it's all the info we have
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/25 04:09 AM
1

We know the women are initiating divorce. We can't assume it's anyone's fault or decision but theirs
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/25 03:25 AM
1

We don't know what we don't know. We can't assume it's the men's fault more often than not.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/25 03:05 AM
1

The hospital itself didn't say that, please point out where they did! You're making shit up.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/25 02:53 AM
1

Also around 60% of single moms were married so for many its not an issue of the guy wanting to commit at least initially. And they initiate between 70 and 80% of divorce. So it's still not the fault of the men
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/25 02:53 AM
1

How is that any more logical then, you know, hooking up with guys who actually want to commit to you in the first place?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/25 02:28 AM
1

I didn't say that, no.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/25 02:13 AM
1

What propaganda? The very article saying they followed protocol? Vs your supposed unnamed doctors saying it "raises serious questions"? Do you understand the difference between raising questions and it being found to have been because of abortion laws? Because the article itself seems to simply go "if we can state some unknown unnamed doctors think it raises questions then we must assume the death was due to abortion laws!!!" Which is fucking hogwash Now why don't you explain why you want to bel…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/25 01:17 AM
1

What lie does this dispel? Doctors with an agenda saying abortion could have saved her life doesn't change that the doctors followed existing protocol. "Some said it raises serious questions"? Or some said? Well let's treat it as if it's established fact because they pontificated. The fuck is going on?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/25 09:59 PM
1

It was the routine prior to the change in laws because the change in laws changed nothing. They are desperate to lie to you
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/25 09:08 PM
1

But when Dr. Andrew Ryan Davis, the obstetrician on duty, finally arrived, he said it was the hospital’s “routine” to give a drug called misoprostol to help the body pass the tissue, Hope recalled From your link. The doctor followed hospital routine and the media decided to use it for their agenda
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/25 08:39 PM
1

favor #2 but y'all fucked that up with fascist nonsense like not letting women with miscarriages handle it safely. Then let's get into the laundry list of other issues wrong with how the pro-life ideology has been handled: This is simple media lies
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/25 10:27 AM
1

Yes... obviously they are going to rationalize it in a different way to make them look better. You do understand how that works right?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/25 12:58 AM
2

What do you mean you don't know anyone who does that?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/25 12:44 AM
1

But women are killing their offspring themselves currently and not because they are starving but because they have plans next weekend. Far more horrific then doing it to prevent the child from suffering.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 10:54 PM
1

think potential mothers are the only one that should make the decision if the child is coming into an okay situation. They are the ones that know the best. By what criteria do they "know best"? Too many people will never heal from the trauma of childhood. And yet most don't commit suicide. Seems they'd rather live. Of course some people manage to rise above a horrific upbringing but these seem more the exception than the rule. Pure speculation.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 10:53 PM
1

Something happening to you allegedly is not evidence it's not uncommon.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/25 11:44 PM
1

Ok?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/25 11:38 PM
1

That situation is completely unrealistic.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/25 11:23 PM
3

Yes that's awful
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/25 11:21 PM
1

Obviously I'm referring to women making better decisions before sleeping with deadbeats
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/25 10:01 PM
2

But if there is no welfare they will be forced to think through their choices. We have to reshape the culture away from the lack of responsibility. Very few people were like that in the 40s and 50s
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/25 09:03 PM
1

Or sleep with the stepfather first instead of the deadbeat
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/25 09:01 PM
1

But you have said you don't want men nor government supporting children No I didn't. I said government shouldn't be forcing men to pay. Do you understand the difference? Of course in the long run we have a dropping and aging population. The aging population will be an issue for a relatively short time. We have had a way lower population in the recent past and it wasn't bad. That's not how things we work. We have created an infrastructure which requires x amount of people participating. It's not …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/25 08:37 PM
2

Your points here, no matter what I say, is to repeat that you believe women are opting out if things over and over. Why? This seems to be happening all over the world Yes that's a problem. It's not good in any way
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/25 07:13 PM
6

If women generally do not care enough about society and more about their tingles that they would rather watch it collapse than change their behavior one iota then what would you have men do?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/25 07:11 PM
3

Women take more as a whole in terms of benefits than they pay in to taxes. So them paying more would just be paying their fair share not a punishment
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/25 07:09 PM
1

That's the thing he didn't want them did he? If he did he would support them. Id suggest the men who would stay with women voluntarily and pay for his kids voluntarily are the good men and the ones who would not are the shitty men but you seem to think the opposite. Why do you think that is?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/25 05:06 PM
1

It isn't portrayed as a good deal by the media and by the fact that they can simply fart out a kid and demand the government get money from the father or take money from all men collectively to fund you
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/25 04:57 PM
1

I think it's simple enough to say the why is that there isn't significant incentive.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/25 04:47 PM
1

Why is irrelevant. It doesn't matter why. We need to figure out a way to reverse it.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/25 04:28 PM
1

None of this is addressing my point.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/25 04:15 PM
2

You're just repeating yourself here
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/25 04:02 PM
2

Well that is an interesting idea. And probably many women would pay big bucks to stay single Cool let's see how they like it when it's their money being redistributed to men instead of the other way around. I am less concerned about adults and dating and more concerned about children having what they need to grow to be functioning adults. And the best indicator of success in children is a two parent home.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/25 03:14 PM
7

I didn't say it was a crime I said it wasn't good for society. And your right one single guy isn't anyone's problem, but when it becomes 30%? 60? 80? When does it become a problem?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/25 02:34 PM
1

Just single women single men already want to be in relationships. And we need to rebalance the dating market as women have too much power currently
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/25 02:09 PM
1

What actions do you want to see your country take to discourage single parent families? Getting rid of welfare and making it financially attractive to be in a relationship via greater tax breaks for people in relationships vs increased tax burdens for single women.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/25 01:50 PM
3

Whether they want to or not they seem to be not taking the necessary actions to prevent it. We need to create the incentive to do so
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/25 12:47 PM
10

Translation of your post: Wah. I don't want anyone to suffer.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/25 12:45 PM
1

Well they certainly don't select for responsibility
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/25 12:45 PM
6

You know zero about me and by attacking me instead of my points you've only proven my point.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/25 12:44 PM
1

I don't need to monitor bad men. I'm specifically against that
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/25 12:41 PM
30

Yes it seems so. Only men are expected to be better than their nature
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/25 12:38 PM
9

Society. He should be ostracized. But most dudes don't just up and leave. And we need to inventivize women to pick good men and try to make things work with them. As it stands a woman has no incentive to not just leave the father and have daddy government take his money and give it to her. That's wrong. Women can and do take advantage of that in many forms.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/25 04:44 AM
10

It is not good for society to have single mothers. It's not good for society to have so many single men.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/25 03:51 AM
6

Sex slaves? No. It also seems though that there's no way to make everyone happy. And it also seems that women are unhappier than men no matter what.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/25 03:36 AM
4

What's wrong with number 2?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/25 03:14 AM
2

Yes. So she should do everything in her power to keep the relationship together
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/25 12:39 AM
2

We'll just have to disagree on that. The issue is that women select only for lust. If they start selecting only for responsibility, men would change to accommodate
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/25 12:17 AM
1

So choose better men.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 11:31 PM
1

Because I do? But I want them to choose men who would give it voluntarily. Instead of men who couldn't care less. What are you not getting here?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 11:13 PM
8

Yes I want to ban the government taking money from men. That way, if women want to have kids, they have an incentive to date men who are stable and reliable.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 11:06 PM
6

Two functioning parents are better than one but things happen: people die, develop mental illness, abandon the family for whatever reason or the family is better off without one of the parents for some dysfunction. We need to incentivize a two parent home. Exactly!! The potential mother is the one who knows the best the situation the child will enter. No not exactly. They don't get to decide for the kid that it would rather die. Plenty of kids have rough childhoods and turn out great.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 10:31 PM
10

Also if one parent is abusive I want the other parent and kids to be able to leave as quickly as possible. Abuse is a valid reason for divorce. Families with an absent parent often struggle so putting more tax burden on them will put a greater financial burden on them that will affect kids. Id rather they get money from their father than the taxpayer. Abortion may indeed be something that child would choose other than having to endure horrific treatment or neglect. While that may be true, you ca…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 10:15 PM
14

What do you mean how do you not punish the children? I don't understand. Dating apps distort women's perceptions and encourage hook up culture. Men wouldn't be able to get no fault divorce either
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 09:56 PM
10

No more no fault divorce. No more abortion. No more social media. No more dating apps. Huge tax breaks for children. Tax burden for single women. Criminal penalties for falsifying paternity, tests mandatory at birth. These are some that id suggest. Edit: I thought of two more. No more child support No more welfare The rest would have be done with social pressures.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 09:21 PM
4

Women generally follow rules etc which is why there's far less women in prison than men. I think we both know that's not what we meant though
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 07:09 PM
51

We outlaw human nature we find incompatible with society why do we not do it with women?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 06:46 PM
1

She should ideally be attracted to and happy with her looksmatch. The fact that she isn't suggests social media has warped her mind
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/25 12:39 PM
1

Men will pursue women they see as easy to get sex from that are below their league for easy sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/25 12:35 PM
1

This suggests that women can just group delusion themselves into being tens. But that's not how it works
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/25 11:14 PM
1

A woman can think she deserves a ten. That does not make her in the same league as a ten
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/25 10:31 PM
1

Yes so men should all settle for women way below their league because of women's collective delusion
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/25 05:30 PM
-1

Because society says yaaars kuweeeeeen! Never settle you deserve the best!!!
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/25 02:44 AM
3

I think the issue most men have is it results in women who would rather be alone than with men who they can get because they want better
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/25 01:32 AM
1

The answer to that is not one sized fits all. It's going to depend on the exact situation at hand. But what the answer isn't is certainly not, without your partners consent, sharing intimate details of your relationship which she or he did not consent to you sharing.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/25 04:51 AM
1

Other people having intimate knowledge of your relationship is both unecessary and unethical. Your partner didn't agree to you sharing that info.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/25 07:07 PM
5

Nah talking specifically about personal things isn't healthy.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/25 05:37 PM
2

So I still don’t understand why you are so outraged that I said any woman who is getting screamed at to “shut up” needs to get away from that situation fast and forever. I never expressed outrage regarding this point. I merely said that just saying she should leave doesn't address the point of the post, that she shouldn't be verbally harassing and abusing people. Verbally abusing someone and then running away to do it to someone else isn't going to change anything. It prevents either of them rea…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/25 05:35 PM
7

It's not healthy to talk about your personal relationship with others, especially negatively. If men do so it's vague, "we are just fighting a lot" etc. Women will literally get down to the nitty gritty with their friends. Specifics that are none of their friends business
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/25 04:16 PM
6

Men suffer in silence. Women can't shut up about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/25 03:30 PM
2

You still have to factually refer to the argument that was made, the literal words stated. You don’t get to replace those words and say “oh no, I know they really meant something completely different than what they actually said”. I am referring to the words. In logic, the principle of charity is a rule for interpretation that requires one to understand and reconstruct an argument in its strongest and most favorable possible light, even if it requires adding missing information or clarifying unc…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/25 01:18 PM
2

You assume that so you can frame the man as innocent and blame the woman for getting hit, no matter what she actually did. No i told you why. In logic, the principle of charity is a rule for interpretation that requires one to understand and reconstruct an argument in its strongest and most favorable possible light, even if it requires adding missing information or clarifying unclear statements. It helps to find the most truth and validity by focusing on the best possible version of an argument,…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/25 01:32 AM
1

No, the post literally says that women, if a man tells you to shut up, you should because he will beat you physically. Again he specified people man or woman and again he said a man might. This is just common sense advice. OP said argument. An argument is not verbal abuse. It’s a disagreement. We are having an argument right now. Are you accusing me of verbal abuse too? Arguments often cross over into abuse and please remember I'm using the principle of charity so I'm presenting his argument in …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/25 12:42 AM
1

There is no “especially”. There is no “it’s not as bad if you abuse someone weaker than you” what the fuck. Nobody said anything about good or bad abuse or who it is good or bad to do it to.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/25 11:58 PM
1

You don't think you can escalate in an argument? Getting louder and more aggressive in your body language? Screaming an inch from their face? Belittling them etc? Insulting them their family their insecurities? You don't consider these things escalation?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/25 07:04 PM
1

He's saying people (including women) shouldn't escalate
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/25 07:00 PM
1

The post is about men feeling the need to become violent and emotionally unstable. Instead of walking away. Quite literally it isn't ant nothing in the post supports this.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/25 06:42 PM
1

That you should not antagonize and escalate.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/25 06:28 PM
1

Telling her to run is not telling her to change her antagonistic behavior. No, that’s not a realistic intepretation of what he said It doesn't matter if you find it realistic you need to be the most charitable. It’s the same advice we give anyone in a fight. Pick the right moment to speak your truth. Safety first. I’m 5’10. You think imma go talk crazy to some 6’3 200 mf because my feelings are hurt? I’m confident in myself and I’ll never back down but I always asset the situation I’m putting my…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/25 06:26 PM
1

I didn't dismiss your point i suggested that you add not being abusive or antagonistic in the first place. Why do you reject that? You give all the charity in the world to OP, but you gave none to mine. Yes to illustrate how you gave none to his! You cannot take an intentionally gendered “obey whoever hits hardest” This is you adding words under were not written but in a non charitable fashion
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/25 05:35 PM
1

Who said those words?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/25 05:28 PM
1

Absolutely and literally nobody said that and if you understood the principle of charity you would understand why you're being dishonest.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/25 05:18 PM
1

The comments which are blaming men for having the breaking point. All he's saying is we recognize humans have limited and instead of recognizing that, they are critiquing men. Why can we not advocate against verbal abuse and antagonizing your partner?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/25 05:15 PM
1

"Run away" Is not relevant to the point. You just keep bleating this and it's ignoring the point. Can we not advocate to not antagonize people as well as to remove yourself from bad situations? to reward violent men with exactly what they want with zero consequences. Absolute fucking hogwash. This is by far the most deranged and least charitable interpretation of OPs argument possible. Which makes it dishonest. The principle of charity dictates that to engage with someone's point honestly we mus…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/25 05:11 PM
1

Im using the principle of charity on his argument and since you did not, I did the same thing to you as you did to him. The best possible interpretation of his argument, is the one I presented, that some people (including women) engage in verbal abuse and that's not okay and they should stop because everyone has a breaking point. It is not accurate to say his argument is women should just be quiet and not argue their point. Tell me, if a woman runs away and avoids this man forever, how is she “v…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/25 05:06 PM
1

Everyone should care to educate themselves. That you don't doesn't reflect positively on you
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/25 04:44 PM
1

Have you heard of the principle of charity?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/25 04:38 PM
1

Have you heard of the principle of charity?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/25 04:38 PM
0

It doesn't solve the problem of her being verbally abusive to leave. I don't get what you're not getting about that.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/25 04:37 PM
1

I've not abandoned anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/25 04:23 PM
1

Have you heard of the principle of charity
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/25 04:22 PM
1

I'm asking you to comment on the other side of the issue. Should people verbally abuse and harass others yes or no
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/25 04:21 PM
1

Yes that's why I used the word can. It also takes self control to not antagonize people does it not? Why can't wet advocate for non violence and no antagonizing?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/25 03:24 PM
1

You absolutely are when your response to a person saying women shouldn't verbally abuse men to their breaking point is somehow reflecting negatively on men.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/25 03:23 PM
1

He didn't say that.. I'm wondering why on earth someone is at their breaking point from a stranger saying, "you suck", or whatever. Have you heard of the principle of charity?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/25 03:21 PM
1

I'm not seeing the issue here. Yes women should not be able to verbally abuse men endlessly gasp!?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/25 02:26 PM
1

The scenario is a man using violence to make a woman obediently shut her mouth and cower in fear. Not at all. Nobody is arguing the woman shouldn't leave. What's being argued is that women shouldn't verbally abuse men, or vice versa.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/25 02:24 PM
1

Everyone can be pushed too far, which is a bad thing. So don't push people too far.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/25 02:18 PM
1

It’s the same advice we give anyone in a fight. Pick the right moment to speak your truth. Safety first. I’m 5’10. You think imma go talk crazy to some 6’3 200 mf because my feelings are hurt? I’m confident in myself and I’ll never back down but I always asset the situation I’m putting myself in. Did you miss this bit?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/25 02:07 PM
1

Everyone here is. When a man or woman gets to the point where they are being verbally abused and they finally have had enough bad things could happen so OP is saying do not push them to this point. It's not hard to understand. Men shouldn't push men to that point. Women shouldn't push women to that. Nobody should. Everyone here seems to be imagining a scenario where the woman is just calmly disagreeing and the man is reacting with threats of violence when that's not the situation he's describing…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/25 02:04 PM
1

Nope. He specifically said it's not a gendered thing. Why are you ignoring that?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/25 02:00 PM
1

So why are you not advocating for people to not be verbally abusive to begin with? Because that's all op was saying
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/25 01:55 PM
1

There's nothing random? Mentally fit people don't verbally abuse others either do they?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/25 01:41 PM
1

Or was equally appropriate for them to verbally abuse me. You're literally advocating for verbal abuse. Why?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/25 01:31 PM
1

Sure have
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/25 01:27 PM
0

And the people who are verbally abusing them, should they not be doing every you need to de stress?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/25 01:25 PM
-1

Why are you advocating for women to be able to verbally abuse men?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/25 12:26 PM
0

Any human can be violent.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/25 12:25 PM
1

It isn't abusive to have a breaking point. I don't think you understand the scenario that we are discussing. If the man was abusive he wouldn't be waiting till the woman verbally abused him enough for him to ask her to stop
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/25 12:23 PM
-1

Every human had a breaking point. This isn't a some men thing. He could walk away or leave Or the woman could stop verbally abusing him
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/25 12:21 PM
1

I don't understand here. They are at their breaking point because you're verbally abusing them but you want to argue it's okay to keep verbally abusing them? And they should just deal with it or walk away? How about you quit verbally abusing them?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/25 04:31 AM
-2

What? What does don't push a man over the edge when they are telling you that you are doing so have to do with a bear? Believe that a bear would also not stand for verbal abuse
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/25 03:10 AM
0

Women are generally weaker than men, yet they seem to think they can push them as far as they feel like in a lot of situations. It would be better for everyone if they didn't do that and when a man signals he needs her to stop antagonizing him she should do so. Every human has a breaking point. And men should do the same for women too!
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/25 03:08 AM
1

"Running" means that you did indeed shut up.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/25 02:21 AM
0

think it’s better to just avoid violent stupid men at all costs, myself. Any human can be violent. He's just saying don't push people passed their breaking point. He specifically says this isn't a man woman thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/25 02:21 AM
1

Nobody is forcing you to do anything? Women do the act to get pregnant and then cry oppression it's nonsense.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/25 03:51 PM
1

There's no argument to engage with here.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/25 04:48 PM
1

This comment of yours is lunacy
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/25 04:40 PM
3

Lmfao the fuck are you talking about
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/25 04:31 PM
4

Cool women shouldn't have sex if they are that concerned
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/25 04:02 PM
1

There's no slavery in not killing the unborn
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/25 03:41 PM
2

"Personhood" is a useless concept that women use to justify killing humans
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/25 03:23 PM
3

I don't care. Women's bodies are built for the natural biological act of reproduction.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/25 03:22 PM
2

I appreciate your position in regards to the stress women take. It's not a simple thing. It's certainly nuanced. I just think of what is the greater good? A life, or piece of mind? That life could be literally anything. That could be the person who finally Unites the world. They could invent some tech that ends scarcity etc. The potential of the life inside of her is limitless. On the other hand you have the good of allowing women to end accidental pregnancies by ending a life. And it is good in…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/25 02:41 AM
2

The reasonable degree means only to the degree which it is threatening you. You cannot kill a person for kicking you in the shins for example. Because that is disproportionate. Killing a human to avoid the issues of a normal healthy pregnancy is disproportionate and thus isn't covered by self defense.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/25 02:12 AM
3

When you exercise self defense you must do so to a reasonable degree.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/25 02:03 AM
0

There's no threat to life, unless there is. Feeling stressed isn't a threat to your life. And the child's body deserves the same protection and the woman's actions placed it there it didn't invade.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/25 01:44 AM
0

I'm not sure what your point is here. You're never "ready" you don't kill humans because you're not "ready".
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/25 01:38 AM
-2

There's nothing to defend against. The woman's body is not under attack by her offspring the act of reproduction, how all humans ever came to exist, is not breaking and entering. What you're suggesting is the equivalent of saying that if you invited a friend into your house and they, say, got trapped under a falling beam and couldn't leave, you they are now an intruder free for you to kill.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/25 01:30 AM
-1

Sometimes people lie for no logical reason at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/25 09:05 PM
1

So it is impossible for it to just be a neutral thing
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/25 05:27 PM
2

Or you should want a man who you like for holistic reasons not to improve your life? There's no just because I like him it's either improve or worsen your life? Is there no middle ground?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/25 05:08 PM
1

Still not as gross as a fat woman at a buffet
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/25 06:14 PM
2

It doesn't matter if it is logical. Gluttony is gross to people. You can't logic your way out of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/25 03:23 PM
-1

Think of it like this. Imagine you see a fat person at a buffet stuffing their face with food. The gluttony is gross. They have easy access to all this food and they are gorging themselves on it. They are going been for serving after serving. A woman who sleeps with many men is similar. They have access to a buffet and they are showing no restraint. They are going back for more and more when they should have had their fill. In contrast, a man is more comparable to a hunter. When he gets a lot of…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/25 03:16 PM

I didn't say it's all social medias fault just that it has an undeniable effect, to what extent, is up for debate
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/25 04:19 AM

I didn't say anything of the sort I just pointed out that social media influences women's standards.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/25 03:01 AM

That cute theory is not really relevant to what I said is it?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/25 02:48 AM

These criteria don't manifest spontaneously. Social media has an undeniable effect
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/25 02:41 AM
1

The only form of effort is therapy?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/25 01:13 AM
1

Who is the arbiter of who is trying? Men seem to claim they are trying and women claim they aren't. Women also have a higher divorce rate in woman on woman relationships why aren't they perfect since women just want the same effort they put in
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/25 12:18 AM
3

If you love someone, you go through the good and the bad together. All that you're proving is you choose the easy way out. And the easy way is usually not the best. It's a cop out.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/25 07:50 PM
1

It's true that sometimes, even working hard doesn't produce perfect results. But it's also true that NOT working at something produces much worse results. No it doesn't. Some people do absolutely nothing and still succeed. That's my point. That's why its the just world fallacy. You're not allowing for the fact that some people just luck out.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/25 03:45 AM
1

The washing machine should turn on because you pressed the button. Hard work should produce better results. But believing that you got x because you worked hard is the just world fallacy.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/25 03:29 AM
2

You're getting hung up on you not saying specific words which amount to exactly what you've said but weren't the words you used so you refute them. It's tiring. You believe hard work will result in success.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/25 03:21 AM
1

Studies have proven women are unhappiest in relationships and more likely to end them the more partners she has. This is not an irrational fear but a logical thought process
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/25 03:12 AM
2

Nobody said he was jealous but you. So you decided what his intent was and then you think he's ridiculous because of what you decided he is?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/25 03:11 AM
3

Hard work can produce results? Sure! Hard work always does or usually does? Just world fallacy
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/25 12:31 AM
0

The just-world fallacy is the belief that people get what they deserve, leading to the assumption that good actions are rewarded and bad actions are punished. This cognitive bias often results in victim-blaming, where individuals rationalize injustices by attributing them to the victims' own actions or characteristics. You believe that people get what they deserve. That those who put in the effort get results, and those who don't, don't. That's not how the world functions unfortunately.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/25 10:47 PM
0

Just world fallacy
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/25 10:45 PM
6

I thought I was leaning blue pill here but I'm not so sure anymore
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/25 09:10 PM
1

Why do you care why they care? Jealousy? I'm only saying that to point out how silly it is to try and judge people's motivations from limited information
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/25 09:09 PM
0

This feels like the just world fallacy
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/25 09:08 PM
0

That's the point isn't it? You can't simply assume that sort of thing
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/25 09:07 PM
-5

How do you know your success came from your efforts vs came from something outside your control
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/25 08:56 PM
-2

The analogy is regarding the natural selection aspect
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/25 08:54 PM
15

Im new here but isn't this a sub to discuss modern dating? Why would you come on a sub dedicated to a subject and ask people why they are commenting on the topic of the sub?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/25 07:47 PM

Thanks man!
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/25 03:49 PM

Long time lurker finally made an account to interact, I made a few comments and got no interaction, can anyone see this comment? Does this sub have a karma restriction?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/25 03:46 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter