TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Illiux Archive

View 0 posts and 20 comments by Illiux on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-1

You underestimate the power of cognitive bias and are far too trusting in thinking that most people tend to rationally resolve cognitive dissonance. The biases in play here are easily visible when one can digest information them without encountering dissonance, but are very subtle when one does encounter it. Re-evaluation of fundamental paradigm in response to contrary information is rare and difficult. This is important to remember, because when we pretend this kind of sickening bias and refusa…
/r/MensRights27/09/13 08:27 PM
4

Theories are well-supported explanations. That's about as close to treating something as fact as you cant get in science.
/r/MensRights26/06/13 04:12 PM
36

I am not an MRA -- I'm actually a rather liberal progressive Being a liberal progressive does not preclude you from being an MRA.
/r/MensRights26/06/13 04:10 PM
10

Education is necessarily politicized.
/r/MensRights26/06/13 04:04 PM
20

I highly doubt that statistics is the hardest form of math out there.
/r/MensRights25/06/13 11:09 PM
1

The grand majority of bathrooms exist on private property. In the absence of any contravening legislation, wouldn't that make its status as a rule or a suggestion the sole decision of the property owner?
/r/MensRights25/06/13 12:13 AM
1

Strictly speaking both cases are hypocritical. No 'might be' needed.
/r/MensRights23/06/13 10:38 AM
6

this post is excellent at explaining why feminism has nothing to do with equality.
/r/MensRights21/05/13 05:21 PM
10

About as common as sexism towards men. Humans have had heavily defined gender roles for most of history. Men and women have always been limited by their defined roles.
/r/MensRights21/05/13 04:59 PM
3

Every word in this title is capitalized. How could you, you monster!
/r/MensRights15/04/13 11:29 PM
5

instantly Did you actually read the post?
/r/MensRights05/03/13 08:06 PM
1

Dolphins aren't people because that word is almost never applied to dolphins; most people would consider an instance of "people" being applied to dolphins to be an error. Welcome to how language works. If you argue anything else, you are necessarily using the word "people" improperly. or more precisely, in a different sense than common parlance. Also, your artificial fine line is defined arbitrarily. You are implicitly assuming that there is one such thing as "consciousness", something that cann…
/r/MensRights22/10/12 08:38 AM
2

The difference here is that I view having sex when you do t want to instead of just walking away as a failure on the part of the person who didn't walk away, as they were the ones being irrational. In fact, that's why treating it as rape is so insulting to the proposed victims - it implies they're incapable of rational action. I can't bring myself to defend irrationality. Also, by placing the distinguishing factor between coercion and rape in the mind of one of the parties, you've deprived the o…
/r/MensRights19/09/12 07:41 PM
4

So trying to change someone's opinion on something is universally unreasonable? What does free from influence even mean? Humanity is necessarily a social animal - reasonable and unreasonable are socially defined. Decision making independent from the imposition of external social influence is neither possible nor desired. You've managed to accuse ever salesman and politician ever of unreasonable social coercion simply for attempting to turn a no into a yes (unless you have some way to limit your …
/r/MensRights19/09/12 07:16 PM
2

Heraclitus was a badass.
/r/MensRights30/08/12 02:45 PM
0

Please, enlighten me as to the exact point where sentience begins to develop. Sentience isn't defined behaviorally and communication of sufficient fidelity with infants is impossible for some years. This leaves me very confused as to the evidential basis of your belief that infants are sentient. So if infanticide is defined as killing a sentient being then killing infants can't be called infanticide with any degree of certainty because we have no method whatsoever to determine sentience. Similar…
/r/MensRights29/08/12 04:21 AM
5

Incorrect. "Innocent until proven guilty" applies to criminal cases only. In civil cases the standard is "preponderance of evidence". A lawsuit for damages caused by a false accusation of rape would be a civil case, and thus have far more lenient standards of conviction.
/r/MensRights29/08/12 03:27 AM
14

No that would be ridiculous. Only women are raped in cases of mutual drunk sex (clearly the idea of "mutual rape" makes no sense). So you see, you were raped and probably have suppressed the trauma.
/r/MensRights03/08/12 05:49 PM
6

He pled no contest, not guilty
/r/MensRights02/08/12 05:01 AM
0

Thats a terrible generalization of philosophy. It notably has an extreme focus on formal logical systems and covers far far more than ethical questions. Science in part relies on portions of philosophy, mainly epistemology.
/r/MensRights24/07/12 05:45 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter