TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Illustrious-Red-8 Archive

View 5 posts and 253 comments by Illustrious-Red-8 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Improve wages and control living costs; more disposable income for the young men can open the door for them to explore their passions and wants in life.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/11/24 02:57 AM
1

Improve wages and control living costs; more disposable income for the young men can open the door for them to explore their passions and wants in life.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/11/24 02:57 AM
1

Improve wages and control living costs; more disposable income for the young men can open the door for them to explore their passions and wants in life.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/11/24 02:57 AM
1

Improve wages and control living costs; more disposable income for the young men can open the door for them to explore their passions and wants in life.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/11/24 02:57 AM
1

Improve wages and control living costs; more disposable income for the young men can open the door for them to explore their passions and wants in life.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/11/24 02:57 AM
1

Improve wages and control living costs; more disposable income for the young men can open the door for them to explore their passions and wants in life.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/11/24 02:57 AM
1

I greatly agree with you. A society that does not encourage monogamy will have a collective of lonely men and bitter women.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/11/24 03:46 AM
3

Improve wages and control living costs; more disposable income for the young men can open the door for them to explore their passions and wants in life.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/11/24 03:45 AM
1

To have an economy that helps men, you don’t have to put women down, but create hope and opportunity for everyone. That's true for the most part; however some would define the limiting of certain privileges as a put down. For example, if an engineering firm has a 50-50 job quota ratio between men and women, is that really fair given that there could be far more male applicants? A revision of that form of privilege that works in favor of women would very quickly be touted as misogynistic in the e…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/11/24 06:39 PM
1

China and India are capitalist regimes with authoritarian governments. Happiness is subjective; a good metric of measuring men's well-being would be economic stability and socioeconomic mobility.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/11/24 06:34 PM
2

So the question is, if men become known as AA/DEI hires, does the status effect of their increased education and wealth go away? Like “oh that doesn’t count, I bet you’re just AA/DEI”. I wouldn't say that's likely; do people dismiss CEO's and surgeons who often come from privileged backgrounds? It's often the end result of what's available in terms of wealth that's lauded, assuming nothing illegal and deeply unethical was going in.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/11/24 06:56 PM
7

start weighing affirmative action and dei initiatives in favor of men so men start getting into higher paying positions and educated again which are two of the biggest things women look for and women are leading in, This is a crucial point to raise; not only does it improve men's dating prospects, thus improving the relations between men and women, but also addresses a legitimate class struggle in which men seem to be loosing their grip in. there is TONS the left can put forward with a minute am…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/11/24 05:01 PM
2

Pretty sure the word "incel" just means any guy who doesn't bend over backwards for feminism's sake.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/11/24 09:02 PM
-1

Where do you see men embracing fascism? Any reason why you believe that? Most men are just average joes living life normally. If anything I would argue that women are more commonly having by extremist political beliefs from what I'm seeing.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/24 12:39 AM
1

What is your political leaning if you don't mind me asking? You seem to be moderate left from the viewpoints you hold.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/10/24 07:00 PM
9

By having a purpose beyond profit and material gain.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/10/24 12:25 PM
19

It's about 30%: https://www.savethechildren.net/news/gaza-least-3100-children-aged-under-five-killed-others-risk-famine-looms#:~:text=The%20occupied%20Palestinian%20territory%20is,rates%20of%20child%20malnutrition%20globally. "The occupied Palestinian territory is now ranked as the deadliest place in the world for children: about 30% of the 11,300 identified children killed in Gaza were younger than five and Gaza currently has the highest rates of child malnutrition globally." https://www.unicef…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/10/24 04:58 PM
9

By Women Most AffectedTM
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/10/24 04:55 PM
1

misandry and misogyny are at an all time high https://katya-koval.medium.com/why-men-have-given-up-on-dating-women-5db8d1fbde33 Yes I admit that my claim was exaggerated, but it's not unfounded. Birth rates also decline across asia and africa. What is your point? Big different between a decline in birthrate between a country developing its societal infrastructure, and between a developed nation giving little incentive for family values. https://amp.dw.com/en/germanys-birth-rates-fall-sharply-ami…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/24 04:01 PM
1

Birth rates are declining across most western nations, misandry and misogyny are at an all time high as men and women are dating less than ever. It's not a matter of a woman choosing another man over you; it's about a culture that's too individualistic and myopic in its consequences, a large scale issue.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/24 12:19 PM
1

True, however his words seem to be meant for male improvement; his definition of "improvement" can be problematic.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/10/24 12:51 AM
0

It's primal and natural for men to succumb to their ego and attempt to dominate women, or at least some who have biologically deterministic views would argue, is it not the absolutely right and civil matter to push back against that?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/24 11:06 PM
1

Shall we start voting for unbridled capitalistic Republicans and live completely amorally, unbound by any moral or egalitarian boundary?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/24 11:04 PM
1

If you wanna blame someone blame those who tried to take the "patriarchy" out of the things you found attractive, they are the most blatant hypocrites in the dating world so focus your rage on them. I'm not sure what you mean here, can you rephrase?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/24 11:04 PM
1

Reddit's popular opinion on dating from a man's prespective isn't anything controversial or out of western society's norms, if anything they will well reflect that. I absolutely could not disagree more. Reddit is an echo chamber that skews towards a particular demographic (young, introverted, and liberal). Well, liberal isn't a pejorative. Moreover, how about those who oppose RedPill stuff on this sub and hold men to impossible standards? There's no indication that they're young and introverted.…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/24 01:22 AM
1

Much of what you'll hear on Reddit will be regurgitated in Real life. Reddit's popular opinion isn't anything controversial or out of western society's norms, if anything they will well reflect that. Moreover, you mentioned Reddit being Left-wing; does right wing rhetoric embrace male vulnerability? It probably does that less than the lefties.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/24 05:28 PM
1

Do you think all women end up marrying top 1% bankers and celebrities? Or is it the case that most women will settle for the average joe?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/24 12:14 PM
1

My main point is that average women aren't dating hyper-successful demi-gods whom OP is describing; average women tend to marry average joes, so this leads me to conclude that OP and like-minded men are focusing on too high-quality women.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/24 04:13 PM
1

Alright, I understand what you mean. Assuming The Red-pill man wants an "average women", What would you say is an "average women" looks like?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/24 03:49 PM
-2

You think if those men shot for overweight women they would have any trouble getting dates?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/24 01:22 PM
-5

It entirely depends on the quality of women the guy is shooting for. Men who complain about not getting a date usually define a "woman" as an NYC model of 1% beauty rank.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/24 03:44 AM
2

Pointing out that some women choose to date manipulative and cruel people is just vindictive as far as I can see. I don’t think it really helps anything. I'm not sure where you heard that, are you referring to any comment that was made here? There are societies that are against forced marriages, but what they do positively is that they teach young men and women that marriage is something to aspire to, and that you either treating women as sex objects or treating men as "ain't shit" commodities w…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/24 09:43 PM
2

Haven't feminists argued for decades about the abusive way men looked at women as mere sex objects, and that gradually improved much thanks to the efforts of feminists to highlight the toxic behavioral patterns of men? So why can't men now bring to light certain toxic behaviors from women and hope for a change; are only women the ones to be optimistic?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/24 08:26 PM
1

I see your point. What I've noticed is that feminism is far more vocal than Masculism, it's also certainly the case that far more women as a % are feminists compared to men as masculists.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/09/24 05:50 PM
1

I think if it's a strong woman with good family and (real) religious values and she has respect for herself enough to not live a hedonistic life, then being called marriage material by her can be a huge compliment.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/24 03:28 PM
3

Some would say that women have a psychological or soft power over men, and while men can physically threaten women, women can psychologically harm men. The latter type of force can be especially effective given that it's covert and plausibly deniable by the perpetrator. Of course, men do use soft/psychological power over women and many do get away with it. But women's toxic femininity is hardly acknowledged.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/24 03:26 PM
2

A Squeaky wheel fallacy.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/09/24 02:43 PM
2

Your neurotic response here precisely proves the point I highlighted previously: much of what men rightfully criticize in women or many push-backs against misandry is labeled as misogyny or extremism. In fact, in your final paragraph you compared MRAs or suffering men to 'mein kampf'; a further proof to my point of society's double standard against men and its hostility to them expressing their negative opinions towards toxic femininity.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/09/24 08:32 PM
23

Which ones are left? The ones made by women to hate on men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/09/24 08:22 PM
1

You responded to my treatise with an overly defensive and aggressive rhetoric, do you expect to be taken seriously with such an attitude?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/09/24 07:23 PM
1

Bruh you know why.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/24 12:18 AM
1

Men these days just don't want to shower.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/24 11:47 PM
1

If we look at the ~170 million women in the USA, how many of them would hold the ironic belief that men who approach are annoying while still expecting men to make the first move? Even if it's less then the 50% mark (which is doubtable) it's still statically significant. The above criticism in the reply you responded to addresses that large group of women.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/24 11:46 PM
1

Bruh you know why.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/24 11:40 PM
16

This can be a strong example in the allusive concept we can analyze, the concept of soft power or, if that power is used malevolently, toxic femininity.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/09/24 11:37 PM
1

I said nothing against you, I did not even look at your username; I simply alluded to the fact that what is often labeled as "misogynistic" or "woman-hating" are perfectly valid forms of criticism. Try the following: 'men often treat women as as sex objects' is an openly accepted idea and not identified as misandry, however 'women treat men as dating commodities' is seen as a vitriol against women. A clear double standard where "misogyny" and "woman-hating" are abused to dismiss men's struggles.…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/09/24 10:30 PM
1

I said nothing against you, I did not even look at your username; I simply alluded to the fact that what is often labeled as "misogynistic" or "woman-hating" are perfectly valid forms of criticism. Try the following: 'men often treat women as as sex objects' is an openly accepted idea and not identified as misandry, however 'women treat men as dating commodities' is seen as a vitriol against women. A clear double standard where "misogyny" and "woman-hating" are abused to dismiss men's struggles.…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/09/24 10:30 PM
6

I said nothing against you, I haven't even looked at your username; in fact I just reread your comment and have no doubt that you were indeed arguing in good faith. I simply alluded to the fact that what is often labeled as "misogynistic" or "woman-hating" are perfectly valid forms of criticism. Try the following: 'men often treat women as sex objects' is an openly accepted idea and not identified as misandry, however 'women treat men as dating commodities' is seen as a vitriol against women. A …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/09/24 10:30 PM
2

Many Asian culture hold strong respect for SAHM, they are seen as the nurturers of the future generations, the concept isn't that the man should be in control, rather it's that men and women have unique responsibilities - that's not to suggest that the abuse isn't there in some cases. In Japan's case, the Late Abe president was strongly pushing for women to join the workforce and management positions in hopes of improving the birth rate condition in Japan.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/09/24 05:18 PM
2

Male sexuality is seen as predatory in mainstream; it's explicitly stated in academia and political feminism that men having sexual thoughts towards women is predatory in primary form. Concepts such as "male gaze" or "female objectification" are touted based off of the mere idea of men being attracted to women as opposed to being creepy in behavior. Surely most people don't spend their free time discussing these topics, but for the average westerner, do you believe they are more critical and fea…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/24 05:12 PM
16

I can agree that one extreme shouldn't drive you to another, but critiquing toxic femininity or prevalent misandry shouldn't immediately be labeled as an extreme or a misogynistic/terrorist behavior.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/09/24 03:36 PM
4

It's probably because throughout history, minorities have been specifically targeted in widespread and systemic acts of violence, ex: The Spanish Inquisition, Atlantic Slavery etc... we perceive racism or ethnic targeting as a legitimate threat to people's lives. The perception for gender however is that there weren't laws upheld that specifically targeted men for violence or cleansing. A war conscription isn't made in the sense that "let's kill all the men" in the same rhetoric Hitler announced…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/09/24 03:03 PM
1

What's up
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/09/24 03:37 AM
11

I don't mean to diminish from the injustice you faced from that post; those commenters are truly vile creatures, but bear in mind that it's the internet, not only will you be exposed to the loud minority of miserable people, but since they're protected by a screen they'll be showing their worst face. From accusations that I don't see my partner as a person because I "only" mentioned that we both save money by living together and that it's super nice to have a warm hug to come home to after work.…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/09/24 03:21 AM
5

Because feminism and western culture is liberal for women but conservative for men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/09/24 02:00 PM
8

That's correct; it would be disingenuous to be monolithic about our definition of "feminism" and label it as a movement of human rights; as if being 'anti-feminist' would entail being against women's right of property ownership. The definitions of feminism have shifted over the decades, what was once a movement of narrowing the rift between the legal rights of men and women has now morphed into a supremacist movement of misandry and derision.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/09/24 10:53 PM
12

That's precisely what I was thinking; focusing on equality while keeping red-tapes around feminism is a undermined effort.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/09/24 08:23 PM
1

What would categorize a global leftist in your view? Do you hold anarchic-syndicate type beliefs like Noam Chomsky?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/08/24 03:33 PM
12

It isn't grifters that radicalize the subs, such sentiments spring from down up; it's the general audience that resonates with specific ideas.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/08/24 02:47 PM
1

Ah, I see. Yes that's a fair point. What I would add is that it's less important that she actually likes you (it's difficult to know that as many people are reserved in this case) and rather it's important to see if a woman has good values. As you correctly mentioned, clues can be picked up from afar: example a woman blasting music in a busy train certainly isn't a good woman and therefore isn't worth approaching.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/08/24 02:02 PM
1

Society doesn't put pressure on men to have game. I'm assuming "game" means romantic charisma; aren't men expected to make the first move, compete with other men, burden women's emotional vents, plan dates, and so on and so forth? That certainly sounds like a strong societal expectation, one that comes from both conservative and liberal societies. Gay men surely don't need game. Gay men are more sexually active than the rest of the population; this is due to the fact that a gay man is flirting w…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/08/24 01:20 PM
24

It's pretty much the untalked about majority regarding "cels"; incels are under constant scrutiny for misogyny, but in actuality "femcels" are far more common. It's completely normalized and heck can be encouraged to say "I hate all men", "men are all pigs" - classic femcel lingo.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/08/24 01:15 PM
1

Look I agree you with but you have to have a better tone bro, your comment is dripping with condescension. I'm not sure where you spotted that, can you pinpoint as to where I insulted you in my previous argument? Also I don't care about being utilitarian with my terms, we quibble over useless shit like correct terminology on the left while the right is going bananas over all of society, Semantics can be an echo-chamber, but it's still worth short discussions, much for the sake of self-defense ag…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/08/24 12:48 PM
1

No but there are clear agreed upon political values on both sides That's certainly true, though I'd say there's a massive enough difference between Stalin and Sanders for us to suggest that titles of "right wing" "left-wing" aren't as Utilitarian as we'd think if we don't add substantial context. believe in the divine right of kings for example. It varies far more than you think; liberal conservatives like Ben Shapiro are all for individualism (though in practice his ideas are awful), on the oth…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/08/24 03:23 AM
2

They are progressive on women's issues, but moderate on capitalism, and conservative on men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/08/24 01:03 AM
1

Leftism isn't a monolith.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/08/24 05:08 PM
2

I agree that women have individual preferences; the crowd must resonate with what your bringing to the table. However, what OP was trying to say beside the unifying preference of women, is that men of high-status uniquely attract women, whereas men are more egalitarian in their selection of women. Would you say that some men choose tall women, and the other short? Probably a 40-60 ratio? Same goes for men who go for rich/classy women or those of more modest backgrounds in life. What's the ratio …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/24 12:14 AM
10

I haven't read the article yet, I'm going to assume they're targeting 'toxic masculinity'.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/08/24 10:15 PM
21

Politics is the choice of the least worst option.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/08/24 02:58 AM
4

Much like how Hillary Clinton or Margaret Thatcher did not present the best interest of the average women, the kings and dukes of history did not fall into the same bucket as the rest of the hapless men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/08/24 01:08 PM
2

Thank you for the perspective. I wouldn't generalize over all "right-wing" ideologies as they certainly exist on a long spectrum. American conservatives are for freedom and I certainly believe that many republicans get far too demonized. What I see is the problem isn't necessarily the morality of conservatives, but rather their ideas that do not play out as they choose for them to. Moreover, many conservatives, such as Ben Shapiro, are ardently anti-abortion, and have claimed that women are happ…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/08/24 04:24 PM
2

That sounds like an interesting film worth watching. Consider this perspective for a moment: Do you not suppose that for someone to have their decades-long experiences suddenly, in a short timeframe of a few months, get revealed to be nothing but a hallucination, to have a massive toll on the individual? I wouldn't call it a "trauma" to be fair, but if we understand from psychoanalysis that we humans are a collection if experiences, it would certainly be fair that such an experience would be for…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/08/24 10:40 AM
2

It may not nessecary just be the life of a male that traumatized Norah; after all being a man isn't "traumatic" per say. It's possible that her having her whole life revolving around feminism, and for decades believed that men lived in paradise, and after conducting her experiment she was left with a feeling of being holistically wrong - a space of mind where " I don't know what to believe in anymore" type.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/08/24 10:46 PM
21

this leads to important question what men can do as individuals and as a group to challenge and change theses misandric laws, and in worst case scenario if these laws don't change how can men avoid compulsory draft ? In the face of a government that not only does not care for the well-being of an individual, but also goes the extra light-year to throw that individual in harm's way, only a wide-spread protest that effectively halts the nationwide operations can have hope for change.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/08/24 04:39 PM
17

It's difficult to pin down the ratio of left to right wing men that criticize feminism. Surely left winged men who critique feminism do so on the basis of feminism's failure to uphold values of egalitarianism, whilst right wing men's critique of feminism is in defense of traditional gender roles and adverse attitude to abortion. How the ratio skews isn't too clear.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/08/24 04:05 PM
1

I appreciate your honest assessment of yourself concerning your place in society. This form of individualism, if it is to be encouraged onto men, must also be projected onto women and dismiss their claims of feminism; if a set morality isn't going to be implemented consistently over the two genders, then it is unreliable and hypocritical in its nature. receive bad judgements from people So? Again, implement the morality onto the two genders; dismiss feminism as equally as you do to male-advocacy…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/24 01:11 AM
1

It isn't unlikely that a scar can be marked and felt even decades after the initial shock-event.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/08/24 09:25 PM
1

They seem somewhat dismissive of some of her points, portraying them as a conclusion based off of an anecdotal bias - that's to be expected in such a sub.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/08/24 09:24 PM
0

Hmm I see what you mean. Granted, I am a male and you female so there will be a rift of emotions we can't fully comprehend from one to another. Many fathers forever see their daughter as an innocent little sweethearts; similair to how many mothers see their son, no matter how old and big he's grown, as her baby little boy. Sex is a complex emotion: it's powerful and in many ways dangerous, many philosophers have written volumes about its complexity and conflict-wrought nature. For a father to se…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/24 06:59 PM
3

Suicide is a permanent solution for a temporary problem. If anyone on this sub is in need of companionship, guidance, or any other form of support, my DMs are always open.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/08/24 06:53 PM
0

You worry about that with regards to your daughter, and yet in your above comment who claimed that Fathers who worry about their daughter's sexual experiences are "perverts". Do you think young girls, still insecure confused and eager for validation, are at risk of getting abused and manipulated by arrogant young men? Based off of that, is it really "perversion" for a father to worry about his daughter's sexual advances?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/24 04:54 PM
1

Many women are either shy or enjoy being chased. I mean Many.
/r/seduction17/08/24 10:04 PM
1

Make eye contact for 2.3 seconds, then rotate your torso by 45.7 degree to ensure maximum attractive effect.
/r/seduction17/08/24 10:03 PM
1

They're all about consent, empathy, and progress until it's when a male is feeling bothered by a female. "Man up and stop complaining!" Said the conservative and progressive in unison. This is strong proof of modern feminism's failure to uphold its self-proclaimed egalitarian nature, rather it's female supremacy, evidenced by the fact that if the genders were reversed in that post the uproar would have been cataclysmic. A new ideology is due, a new mode of thought, whether it's called Masculism …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/08/24 06:40 PM
10

There is sentiment in conservative thought that women are the more sensible and conscientious gender. I've heard it constantly from Peterson and Shapiro the insinuation that if a man isn't married with a woman then that man is somehow morally corrupt; the idea here is that women somehow know perfectly well how to choose the good-hearted moral man, and thus a man chosen by a woman is the ideal saint.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/08/24 03:19 PM
1

Close https://www.reddit.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/s/aQBnfdbavu How did you guess the country?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/08/24 07:17 PM
16

"For the same work" wording is misleading, if I work 10 hours as an engineer it's "the same work" as an engineer working 5 hours, I feel that Harris is beating around the bush to avoid admitting that the pay discrepancy between men and women is justifying by a primary criteria that is number of hours worked, rather than discrimination.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/08/24 03:56 PM
63

They're all about consent, empathy, and progress until it's when a male is feeling bothered by a female. "Man up and stop complaining!" Said the conservative and progressive in unison. This is strong proof of modern feminism's failure to uphold its self-proclaimed egalitarian nature, rather it's female supremacy, evidenced by the fact that if the genders were reversed in that post the uproar would have been cataclysmic. A new ideology is due, a new mode of thought, whether it's called Masculism …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/08/24 02:58 PM
5

Human beings are egotistical creatures. Our search for knowledge, truth, and logical patterns are motivated by our emotional fulfillment.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/08/24 01:08 PM
10

Perhaps successful men are more likely to attract women and thus likely to be married. A chicken or egg analysis.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/08/24 01:07 PM
1

The average woman is going to appreciate a cold-approach in a supermarket, church, park, right?
/r/seduction14/08/24 06:19 PM
1

By that metric the vast majority of people are losers lol.
/r/seduction14/08/24 06:17 PM
1

Masculine means taking charge and having an assertive personality. "Insecure" in some extent, a lot women do like it when a man isn't passive or shy. Would you say the average women has a particular preference between a shy guy who goes with the flow vs a social guy who takes the attention of the room?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/24 01:52 PM
1

What's characterized as an "Ulterior motive" and the negative reaction to it is largely dependent on the person's value. You're more likely to perceive courtesy from an attractive person as genuine heart-melting kindness, whereas the exact same act would be interpreted as creepy manipulation from a less attractive person. Furthermore, even if the ulterior motive is explicit and understood, it would still be positively perceived if performed by someone attractive: clever, social savvy etc... rath…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/24 12:57 AM
1

It's true that most women do want masculine men, contrary to what feminism claims. Is it still accurate to say that the vast majority of women in the US fit into what OP characterized?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/24 09:42 PM
3

How can we define what "patriarchy" is? It seems to me that they use the word patriarchy to characterize a conservative, heteronormative, and hierarchical society. I do find it debatable as to why the paternal elements in slide into the word that's synonymous with authoritarianism.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/08/24 05:17 PM
2

Only 20% of Russian men born in 1923 survived world war two.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/08/24 11:14 AM
1

Our understanding of the value of the human individual does broaden with time no doubt, thus it is valid to suggest that egalitarian sentiment toward human societies does increase in its prevalence as time moves on. My perspective here is that the prevalence of egalitarian ambition doesn't erase from existence hierarchical dynamics. Rather than assuming that Europe's emergence of right wing politics to be a trace of past colonial attitudes, our understand of psychoanalysis could demonstrate that…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/08/24 04:56 PM
1

Even with the similar age comparison; it is highly improbable that a man famous for his software technology could be more appealing than a famous musical artist. This would be telling that the status of a man, therefore his appeal to women, is more so tied to his embodiment of a specific persona rather than sheer socioeconomic success.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/24 02:34 PM
21

It isn't, but a story is a projection of our morality, and those who resonate with it share those morals. What we see in Dragon Ball is a conservative take on masculinity: men are the action doers and pain endurers, while the women must be saved and protected. Notwithstanding that, I think Dragon Ball is a great example of positive masculinity; Goku being the most powerful character in the series and yet refusing to hurt innocents, and in some cases even showing mercy to his enemies, is a prime …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/08/24 01:16 PM
1

I could have misunderstood your point. The topic I noticed above ties in with Hegel's view of humanity that it moves in all its societal forms towards a progressive path characterized by egalitarianism and increasingly non-violent modes. I have my disagreements with it; history often moves in cycles of liberalism and authoritarianism, every system we embrace is a temporary foundation for us to embrace iur lives, and will eventually crumble leaving us with a necessity to fill its void with anythi…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/08/24 04:12 AM
1

History moves in pendulums. There's nothing to tell about how the world would look like in 500 years from a context of the conservative-progressive spectrum.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/08/24 12:24 AM
1

There is clear evidence to suggest that dating is in a state of disfunction and that it is not a matter of Redditors' subjective analysis: https://www.forbes.com/sites/brucelee/2023/02/13/for-valentines-day-5-survey-findings-about-singles-from-pew-research/#:~:text=Among%20those%2018%20to%2029,to%2049%20years%20of%20age. "Among those 18 to 29 years of age, 63% of men versus 34% of women considered themselves single."
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/24 10:19 PM
24

So by their logic, when men win at something it's capitalism, corruption, and domination. But women winning is somehow egalitarianism and progressivism. To be honest, it silently admits a negative opinion of women: as if they're children who must be pampered for them to win at life, which of course only demonizes men in the meantime.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/08/24 05:46 PM
1

not for nothing reggaeton is the most listened music in the world. I'm not sure where you got this information, but even if it's true, it doesn't imply any gender split and could very much be a gender-neutral phenomena.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/24 04:41 AM
1

I think you're looking at at inaccurately. "The Wall" refers to a personal change of a person that isn't completely contingent of how they are perceived by others of a specific age group or preference. For example, a women in the period of "The Wall" would be viewed as objectively unattractive compared to her 20 year old self (assuming no weight change has occurred) by men younger, older, or same age as her. It has less to do with how she is perceived by specific others, attraction-wise, and mor…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 03:02 PM
0

OP, there are problems in life that are worth examining, discussing, and brainstorming solutions for. Every area of social justice (barring its hysterical political corrected forms that can do more harm than good) started with this "indignation" that you're referring to. Acknowledging a problem and discussing its nuances is the first step towards solving it, contrary to what bootstrap conservatives would like to espouse. Women have had their feminism: they enjoyed the political movement of analy…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/24 10:37 PM
0

Same goes for feminism right? https://www.vox.com/2015/2/17/8050259/discrimination-against-women-is-a-real-problem-in-college-admissions "Discrimination against women is an open secret at some private colleges Evidence has mounted in recent years: at some colleges, although not all, men can get in with less impressive credentials. A push for gender balance on campus means accomplished young women end up competing with each other rather than crowding out less accomplished young men."
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/24 10:32 PM
1

A lot of dudes I meet in the IT field can be insanely arrogant, combative and condescending but its masked in this sheen of "niceness" and/or non confrontation. This goes for the vast majority of corporate personalities you will meet. It works very well in an office setting but is an absolute death sentence in modern romantic life. Perhaps "arrogant" and "combative" can mean different things to various people. But going by the common perception of it: Is it really the case that men's failure in …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/24 03:29 PM
4

Culture definitely plays a role. High status in NYC is being a top shot lawyer, while in an artsy neighborhood in San Fran it's being a musical artist or something of that sort. Money does play a role, but it's only one criteria; would you say Justin Beiber has a stronger status presence among women than Bill Gates?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/24 12:30 PM
–

I’ve been around way more than the average redditor and yeah, seen that stuff before. At one time I was living in a dumpster of an apartment complex that was full of baby daddy characters and those guys had a line of women out the door and around the corner. The nuance here: how qualifying are those women? Looks wise, personality, mental health, etc..
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/24 03:29 AM
–

I agree with your overall message that morality isn't what women primarily seek from men, bur rather is a criteria among a large set. These women are essentially the female equivalent of the pathetic male simps who ogle over women online. Do you think all women do what those did at a concert? Or how about even "most"? For every woman you see treating herself like a trash-bag, there's one staying at a library on a Friday evening building a future, as per her parents' instructions.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/24 03:27 AM
6

Wouldn't you say physically attractive people are more likely to be confident?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/08/24 01:34 AM
1

This is a biological determinist perspective. Do you believe that humans beings have their worldly perception shaped based off of their environment? Even with an inherent biological drive, if a man born into a village with only medium-attractive women, his idea of an "ideal woman" would only be shaped to the extent by which his observations have lead him to visualize what "woman" is. Look at how many poems, heroic war-sacrifices, and love-story men have fantasized for the sake of love for women …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/24 03:49 AM
1

Yeah, that is TRUE. TRUE
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/24 05:29 AM
1

She did say "those men", as in the ones she's looking at, entailing that she wasn't referring to all men.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/24 03:41 AM
1

True, this comment highlighted that. https://np.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/s/qrhlcaC8mT
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/24 03:38 AM
3

IMO as long as you're fun to be around and good at what you do, nobody worth a shit really cares about your relationship status. The worst most people can do is crack some jokes at your expense or try to elicit a response from you. I agree that people in general do not think about us as much as we think. We tend to overestimate our own importance, much to our own detriment. However, you are underestimating the negative impression society tends to hold with men who struggle in dating. There are i…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/24 03:20 AM
1

At the very least, Conservatism delivers some form of reward system for the sacrifices you make. I understood your main point, but I'd say that with conservatism's loyalty to capitalism, that which has well entered into its late stage in today's societies as witnessed by the ever-growing wealth inequality, its meritocratic nature is rapidly dwindling.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/08/24 08:51 PM
1

I think what some people forget is that while feminism is a part of progressiveness, progressiveness isn’t just feminism. It’s possible to be liberal/progressive while also seeing the flaws of feminism. Caveheat Certainly true. Though my cave-heat here is the so far little effort collective progressive ideology has accumulated thus far in terms of acknowledging the power struggle men could have in the face of the opposite gender. Is liberalism perfect? No. But it’s still a better option that con…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/08/24 08:28 PM
1

There's a very good chance there's been female Hitlers in terms of innate morality, but who never had the power to actually end up leading a genocide. Conversely, plenty of incredibly noble and heroic women haven't really been allowed in positions like fighting oppressors on the battlefield (though, I'd argue there's plenty of heroic women in different ways that you can learn about!) I am taking a psychoanalytic approach to it. Do men seem to posses a more involved approach towards society? Men'…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/08/24 02:59 AM
1

Is it women who convince men to sacrifice their life in combat? I feel that men's participation in war can be self-driven; a quest for heroism and meaning in life, notice how in many culture soldier-positions are usually reserved for men, and it was especially the case in the older days.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/08/24 12:29 AM
1

I seek to reply to what you and u/SchalaZeal01 expressed in your reply. Firstly, I absolutely agree with what you expressed as a feminine soft-power not only being a one of the primary means of action for women to seize power and influence in society, but is also is a formidable force in its own right. One nuance we must add here: we mustn't dichotomize hard and soft power in the two respective categories of male and female. We can see an example of Putin; a frail old skinny man who has power st…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/07/24 07:12 PM
1

Academia is biased towards both men and women in different ways. Towards men they assume a toxic masculinity sort of relationship often, and there is a heavy lack of female studies in many areas. That is correct, my analysis was a chicken or egg perspective: is academia the cause of cultural misandry? Or is the culture that influences our academic exploration? I'm inclined to believe it's the latter. I wholeheartedly reject the notion of there are both more exceptional and terrible men than wome…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/07/24 05:43 PM
4

lack of studies on female perpetrators of any violence, lack of understanding on female vs male methods of violence, biases in law and academia, etc result in the idea that women are more moral and men are malevolent by default, resulting in the extremely prejudiced idea of being "one of the good ones". Here we speak about the broad cultural identity of a specific society, let's assume it's the USA; most people do not actually follow academia or any sort of research papers, nor do they heed the …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/07/24 01:39 PM
1

Quite the rick roll.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/24 10:46 PM
1

She didn't commit a crime, and he is holding feminism responsible for erasing male victims of rape based on the supposed actions of one feminist. I have no idea who the woman is, but if she was a vocal feminist and had influence over a great number of feminism, then we can derive some blame to be placed over feminism if its great adherents display some level of toxicity towards what feminism often opposes, that is the male population. An ideology or religion can have a concrete identity, however…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/24 05:59 PM
1

Your original claim was the following: The manosphere only cares about men's issues as long as they can throw it in women's, and especially feminists', faces. The second they can't do that, they don't give a shit. I give you examples that are indeed men's issues, are talked about by the RedPill (Mano-sphere), and don't involve women. The definition of issue is the following, as per the Cambridge dictionary: "a subject or problem that people are thinking and talking about". The first topic is mar…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/24 04:08 PM
1

Jordan Peterson made the claim that if you're not married by 40 and have kids, then you're "immature" per his words. Of course, a marriage with kids involves a man and a woman; thus Peterson's idea is a man's and a woman's issue.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/24 03:48 PM
1

Richard Cooper's book is a phenomenal guide on how to avoid toxic women, and for the men who have been emotionally abused by women in the past, such a book is no grift.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/24 03:46 PM
1

Your above comment spoke of a systemic case: "men as a whole population should care...". You now are speaking of close friendship ties. It's unfair to tell women who live in a pro-life state that she has female friend or meaningful connections who empathize with her. You shifted your tone from a systemic analyses to a personal one, thus your logic is inconsistent.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/24 03:45 PM
1

When men speak of their politically incorrect problems, as TRP does, they are met with vehement backlash and hostility. Men do care about each other, but they care for women more. Masculinity is contingent on feminine approval. As such, men's problems cannot be met with full empathy, not can we have any reason to assume that this can be ameliorated as a cultural phenomena.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/24 03:44 PM
1

Well said my man.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/24 03:42 PM
2

The above commenter was holding feminism accountable for a specific case of a crime involving that woman. Mass shootings happen for many reasons, the case of Elliot Rodger was driven by misogyny. You're trying to erase the distinction between the different cases of mass-shootings in order to provide a refutation for the above commenter, by alluding to Elliot's unique mass shooting.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/24 03:40 PM
1

Feminists often attack Traditionalist women influencers: https://moneywithkatie.com/blog/the-naked-financial-hypocrisy-of-tradwife-influencers?format=amp Much like RedPill, feminism also isn't tolerant to women, which it claims to defend, is they deviate from it claims to be the ideal set of characteristics. That does not mean feminism ought to be dismissed. Like life is temporary and we all die, why can't a guy enjoy childish stuff like his fave nintendo games? This is a deflection of criticism…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/24 03:30 PM
1

The manosphere only cares about men's issues as long as they can throw it in women's, and especially feminists', faces. The second they can't do that, they don't give a shit. I can give an example that unequivocally nullifies your statement. Richard Cooper is one of the most well-known RedPill content creators. In this video, he exclusively dissects Jordan Peterson's ideas of marriage, where Richard claim's that Peterson's "TradCon" ideas are harmful to young men: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=4…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/24 03:26 PM
2

Conservatism, above all else, seeks to preserve the current order. It seeks to protect the interests of [established power] from the dangers of destabilizing changes - to maintain or perhaps incrementally improve upon the status quo. I believe this is a more fundamental understanding of Conservatism than "Darwinian heteronormative hierarchy", which I personally think sounds rather silly. If the "established power" supports abortion and LGBT rights then certainly we can't presume that conservatis…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/07/24 03:31 AM
1

I hope you're joking.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/07/24 09:24 PM
5

A warm reception of a discussion on men's struggles in the same manner it functions with feminism's discussion of women's.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/07/24 09:24 PM
1

I meant this: Hormonal birth control would not exist. Look at what women have become since. I sought to understand the logic you used to derive this causality.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/07/24 07:26 PM
–

OP's mistake was using the wrong benchmark to evaluate the standards of men. Many societies have fatness as a rarity rather than not.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/24 06:09 PM
–

u/LaborAustralia you're comparing the standards of the average man beside the reality of the western woman and concluding that the former is too high. In other words your conclusion is inaccurate as you used the inappropriate benchmark. Why not conclude instead that the western woman's quality is too low? Not being fat and having no kids from a previous marriage is a matter of not being careless with your life, but that's not something that's commonly touted in selfish western societies. Proof t…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/24 06:08 PM
2

The nordic model can serve as a template for nations to aspire to.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/07/24 04:40 PM
5

We are all entitled to our own opinions. But you are most certainly responsible to back up your own words through either theoretical logic or empirical evidence. If you won't back up your argument beyond just a handful of vague words, it will be dismissed.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/07/24 03:12 PM
1

Intelligence has less to do with cognition and more so with open-mindedness.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/07/24 03:09 PM
6

I see. I think that's a false causality however. Putting all the blame on birth control places too big of a societal phenomena on a single product. I like to analyze chicken or egg perspectives: did the birth control change women, or did the changing women seek birth control? Look at societal identities at the systemic rather than individual levels. When we speak of systems, we are now looking at the western one. "Further­ more, it is only modern Western capitalist culture for which autonomy and…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/07/24 02:45 PM
2

Is it hormonal birth control or "birth control" as a general term? Singapore is very open about abortions, they have clinics all over the country, but feminist misandry isn't prevalent there at all.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/07/24 02:24 PM
5

Are you claiming that birth control is what lead to western misandrist culture?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/07/24 02:19 PM
8

I would like a more open-ended result; it isn't one specific achievement that I'd want society to have, rather I'd like to see an opening of a discussion whereby people and citizens lend their ears to men's struggles in the same way it did to feminism in the 20th century.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/07/24 01:05 PM
2

Warren Farrel is one of most renown and prolific writers about men's issues, if not the most.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/07/24 01:03 PM
–

I've noticed that, to be honest this sub is more of an echo chamber than any serious discussion platform. The above commenter is an interesting one: she is of a certain personality types that have concrete heads. It is evidenced by the fact that she has been on this sub for years now, whereas most people would just moved on to do better things in life after they've settled on the middle ground between blue vs red pill. Debating a stubborn person like her who isn't mentally capable of making conc…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/24 06:10 AM
2

Your original claim is that feminism as an ideology seeks to recognize men and women as equals, culturally and legal, more importantly the latter. I think feminism is genuinely egalitarian in some ways. But there are many examples, besides the one I have above which I'll admit is flawed, that shows a supremacist sentiment among self-identified feminists. A clear cur example of this supremacist attitude is displayed as follows in the discourse of gender in college admissions. As a worldwide pheno…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/24 04:07 PM
1

The cornerstone of feminism is that women are equal to men, and thus people, in respect to the law. I think some of feminism is that, but it can be characterized as a more broad ideology. Feminism is a collective will of women to seek autonomy and safety from men. The equal rights doctrine is often violated by women in the case they perceive an unfair advantage given to men by nature, not a legal system. A prime example of feminism violating the equal tights doctrine is their seeking of exclusiv…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/24 02:03 PM
1

I appreciate your concern. But I'm athletic, well-read, confident, and have a stable career.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/24 04:42 AM
4

Most men outearn women. Men out-earn women as a whole population, but men occupy both sides of the extreme. In other words, if most rich people are men, it's also the case that most homeless people are men. Moreover, women are in many areas out-earning men and increasingly so. "Nationwide, women outearn men in just 42 U.S. cities out of an analysis of some 1,800 cities, according to a new GoBankingRates report using Census Bureau data." It's only 42 cities (NYC and DC are two of them), but the t…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/24 12:03 AM
7

Your claim is that most women do not have unrealistic standards when it comes to men. Doesn't this contradict some of the findings we are having? For example: https://nypost.com/2023/03/01/rate-of-single-men-in-the-us-looking-for-dates-has-declined/ "New data from the Pew Research Center has shown that 63% of men under 30 are choosing to be single – up from 51% in 2019." Men are increasingly becoming single, they are choosing that as a means of giving up on dating. Why would they give up? An exp…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/24 11:29 PM
0

OP you mentioned "Americans" in the titled, besides the identity of the cherry-picked group as "online", and I believe you make a great point here about the cultural differences of people worldwide, and how TRP is a western reactionary problem. Western societies are individualistic, as evidenced by movements such as feminism and the LGBT that defy heteronormative superstructures (archetypes). The split of men and women, woke vs TRP wars, isn't as prevalent in collectivist Asian societies as they…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/24 11:21 PM
7

Do you deny the reality that women have unrealistic expectations of men in the western world?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/24 11:19 PM
2

Completely free even if you really think being allowed to stay in someone's house is pay (which it isn't, parents aren't paying their children for existing). I wasn't suggesting that a wife was being paid via residence. I was putting forth the idea about how one cannot equate family chores with economic market services. You're assuming that if a meal costs 8$ in an economy then that is what a woman should assume to be paid after cooking, but that ignores that if you are to use free market theory…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/24 01:51 PM
1

Cooking and cleaning for someone all the time isn't something to be sniffed at. You'd pay good money for it and they're usually doing it for free while working as well while their partner doesn't return in kind. Few things to analyze here: Services of cooking and cleaning offered as a paid service will include a surplus value as a means to compensate the labor above its inherent value. For example, when a man gives his wife some amount of money, he of course doesn't apply free market principles …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/24 05:24 AM
1

You are more active on mensrights sub as well no? That place is far less moderated than here.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/07/24 04:30 PM
5

they just want to call men emotional cripples in a socially progressive way. The one thing conservatives and progressives can get a common footing on.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/07/24 01:11 PM
1

OP it's not about men being upset for women's preference for shallow attraction, it's about how unrealistic those preferences are. Any man who complains about women not wanting to date men aren't broke is a a man who's a whiner. But it's totally reasonable for critique a specific female population's preference for six figure earning men, especially when those women aren't earning that much but for some reason demand it on the men they consider their equals.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/24 10:07 PM
1

God DAMN this person is insufferable, I tried watching one of his video to see his opinions but I couldn't get past the 5 minute mark before the logical fallacies were too much to bear. I wouldn't say that leftism can be denounced because of one of its adherents its too aggressive and closed minded; if family values are important to us, then we surely wouldn't denounce them on the Basis that a popular conservative like Ben Shapiro betrays the working class.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/07/24 03:00 AM
1

There's a fine difference between helping women develop a healthy relationship with beauty standards, and between telling women that they're perfect just the way they are to reinforce youthful narcissism with a misandrist insinuation of course that any criticism is a patriarchal piranha.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/24 03:16 PM
2

Women choosing a man has to do with a long list of characteristics by which a man can be described. For example, there is age, height, personality, fame, money, wisdom, career, muscle, hairline, etc... that are all spontaneously embodied with a man to form his identity. Consider this, outside of a few radical red pill spheres, who would think that every woman would marry a 6ft2 loser-bum just because of his height? The fallacy here is assuming that a particular preference of women is the definin…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/24 10:36 PM
2

This is all very interesting, the why. Still means women have no freedom and are miserable. The religion seems very messed up. Calls for violence against anyone not Muslim. Calls for oppression of women and girls and demonizes men. The Taliban isn't a proper representation of the vast majority of Muslims. Believe it or not, even Iran (which is considered pretty strict with its interpretation of Islam) is more liberal on abortion than many American republicans are. In Saudi Arabia women are sever…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/07/24 01:21 PM
10

women can drive, be out alone, dress as they please, and get an education. You can do that in all the middle east except except for the few war-torn areas in Yemen, Syria, Iraq, and Palestine. The exception would be the case for clothing: dress codes are strict for both men and women in the conservative areas in the middle east, it's not a gendered matter. Iran has 70% of STEM fields in the hands of women, one of the highest rates in any country in the world. A similair occurrence in Kuwait: KU …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/07/24 01:42 AM
7

Isis is a small radical terrorist group that the majority of Arabs abhor; they're essentially the KKK of the middle east. Your argument was built on a selection bias; most Arab men are self-minding non-violent average joes. Saudi Arabia has been progressing in recent years, it's on route to becoming a first world country. https://www.acenet.edu/Programs-Services/Pages/Communities/Womens-Leadership-in-Saudi-Arabia.aspx
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/07/24 11:28 PM
16

You are right that many men are hesitant towards career fields that are associated with a female staff. However with regards to the work performed, in this case the discussion of nurse careers, most plumbers and sewage workers being male would suggest that working with.. undesirable compounds wouldn't be off limits to men's favorable career choices. I'd say we should leave career fields to be occupied based off of merit rather than quotas, though I'm no expert on this subject and perhaps others …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/07/24 10:28 PM
19

It's an incredibly resourceful blog: http://empathygap.uk There is a lack of action on under-representation of men in certain professions, contrasting with the huge focus on assisting women into areas where they are under-represented (e.g., STEM, though women now dominate in STEMM). The unfortunate reality of "equality" and "leftist analysis" with regards to gender ratios in specific lines of work is that a career-field being primarily female occupied is seen as a sign of merit and spite towards…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/07/24 08:39 PM
10

That's correct. On that note, It's very normal for both genders to have insecurities against one another, it still is the case.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/07/24 06:00 PM
21

I've lived in ultra-traditional Arabic societies in the past, it's usually men who are demonized by being stereotyped as aggressive brutes, while women are pedestalized as the kinder and more trustworthy gender. Granted, I only speak anecdotally and do not suggest that Arabic women don't suffer from stereotypes or misogyny.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/07/24 04:18 PM
1

u/Earthmaster
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/07/24 01:59 PM
6

Very true, I've constantly seen "gay" get used as a pejorative to describe hetro men who take a break from relationships, and it doesn't just come from conservatives, though of course they are the usual guilty party of that.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/07/24 03:40 AM
13

One can say that the topic of unrealistic beauty standards in women wasn't a topic owed to women, but it was discovered and elaborated on nonetheless. Of course, relationships and sex aren't owed to men, and we do not want the barbaric traditions of forced marriages. However, It would only do good to do for men what was done for women; the promotion of an ideal; that beauty isn't just the physical aspect. And what do you exactly propose by "encouragement of monogamy"? how is that "encouragement"…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/07/24 02:43 AM
2

One can say that the topic of unrealistic beauty standards in women wasn't a topic owed to women, but it was discovered and elaborated on nonetheless. Of course, relationships and sex aren't owed to men, and we do not want the barbaric traditions of forced marriages. However, It would only do good to do for men what was done for women; the promotion of an ideal that beauty isn't just the physical aspect. The problem is while those things can be important, they are not owed, We are owed fair trea…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/07/24 12:20 AM
37

This topic in unnecessarily controversial. You cannot speak of men's dating difficulties without hearing that "dating isn't that important" or "you're just an incel who can't get a date". Dating/marriage are crucial for our mental health. Friends and family cannot compensate for the human desire to pair-bond with a loving partner. And most importantly: there is overwhelming evidence to suggest that that women have it easier in dating, and receive more empathy for their woes in it. I do not know …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/07/24 06:25 PM
1

That's way more of a rich/poor thing than a man/woman thing. Socioeconomic status does place a role in one's dodge of a draft, however while rich men aren't on the frontline, none of the women (regardless of wealth status) are forced to do so either. The video presents only some of the evidence to suggest gender playing a role in one's fate during wartime, the further and full picture of the evidence is how there is an explicit knowledge of how Ukraine implemented the draft to men-only to show u…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/07/24 04:34 PM
1

I see no benefit to today's conservative though movement, their desire to empower corporations, preserve an archaic culture, and slash worker rights offer to safe ground for men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/07/24 01:09 PM
3

Liberalism is freedom from institutions of power, is it not?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/07/24 05:27 AM
3

You havent searched for number of scholarships given, you haven't search for proportion of hiring by gender, you havent searched for subsidized funding by gender in academia, you havent searched the funds for most popular specific health conditions for men vs women and number of campaigns. It seems that you're shifting the goalposts of the argument here: I'm making a point to disprove the claim that rightists are better for men than leftists, but then you jump and begin mentioning the gender une…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/07/24 12:45 AM
3

Universal healthcare protects women, not men, as men are more reluctant to seek help, because of how society shaped them to man up. In consequence, women drain more funds, while men dont. Try to argue. Education. Women get scholarships, men dont. Men drop out twice as likely from academia. Men are becoming more retarded, autistic. Men are behind education as soon as elementary. Why are you being so dense? In the USA, healthcare treatments and University degrees cost tens of thousands of dollars:…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/07/24 07:33 PM
4

Where does a young man fit in these narratives? Last 20 years and 4 waves of feminism coupled with leftist parties speak against it. I've already explained this to you 3 times already: does universal healthcare, education, infrastructure, and worker union protection not help young men? Why do you feel spat at and castrated by feminists? I understand that feminism is taken too far by some leftists and you're really exaggerating the language here. The left supports talibans in Hamas. Let that sink…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/07/24 06:35 PM
3

You can highlight another person's text by adding a ">" before it. highlighting text. Defund the police was a thing. It was means of the left leaning parties have their own personal militia in the district or county. Even with that trend, police officer's salaries are still noticeably better in blue states vs red ones. https://www.forbes.com/sites/andrewdepietro/2020/04/23/police-officer-salary-state/ Yes, but this is on paper. Take me serious, please. I said that boys and men fail in every metr…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/07/24 04:51 PM
11

Lenin, Stalin, Hitler, Mao, Mussolini, all got to power beginning with socialist parties with good faith, offering a mission, a goal for young men, a purpose of either uniting nation, overtaking the institutions etc. I dont know why but a lot of people consider this figures as extreme right leaning, but i think its worth to note how such thing came to power or came to be, rather than what it had become. Fascism is authoritarian centre: there is indeed a leftist element of worker rebellion agains…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/07/24 04:32 AM
7

Here is the disconnect. Majority of worker class people are men. In every country. The current ideology of the left doesn't have any appeal to young men. Further so, it demonizes them at the expense of them to prop up women and feminism. You are correct that leftism doesn’t value masculinity or inherent manliness as a cultural force. Through indirect means, however, leftism can benefit most men. For instance, leftism’s instance on pro-universal healthcare, support for worker’s work-life balance,…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/07/24 02:20 AM
6

I'm not sure why you'd conclude that only rich people can be left leaning. Do you mean that the inspection of people's cultural backgrounds takes time and energy which poor folks don't have? Granted, that's only when it comes to theoretical diagnosis of the immanent culture, and it's true that most people do not have time for such philosophy. But putting aside the theorizing and philosophies; when it comes to action, we either take a right-wing stance (follow the hierarchy and resist change) or …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/07/24 01:02 AM
3

Hegel claimed that a human is a by-product of his/her/their historical time. A right winger would watch African American crime rates and conclude that there's something wrong with the blacks in America, and come up with all sorts of racist ideas. To be a leftist is to uphold a more inspective and progressive insight into the affairs of each individual, particularly if they're trouble makers: why are black crime statistics high? Why are there so many fatherless households in AM communities? Could…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/07/24 11:46 PM
2

Thank you for the follow up and I appreciate your honesty. This sub has changed in many ways since last year when I spent a few months looking through it. There seems to be some admittance towards the challenges men face, and the skepticism towards the idea of holistic male privilege.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/24 04:33 PM
1

Especially misogynistic men, or at least benevolently sexist ones.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/07/24 03:24 PM
1

Spot on; Traditional chivalry is well alive in modern political and cultural feminism.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/07/24 03:19 PM
1

I kinda suspect you're giving a disingenuous "gotcha" answer to invalidate OP's point by only feigning agreement with them. To strengthen your argument and cast away doubts, can you give a brief example of women's privilege?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/24 01:38 PM
7

It's essentially toxic feminism from men's mouth. It only took one comment on my behalf expressing disagreement for me to get Perma banned lol.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/07/24 12:53 AM
12

The sheer extent psychological influence women have over men, as well as the human tendency to shift all blame on men, under the notion that women do no wrong, and even if she does it is assumed that she was pushed to such a level by men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/07/24 12:51 AM
1

Not really a fantasy; old lonely women are miserable.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/24 02:31 PM
1

u/Tight_lawfulness3206 The reason for men's bitterness and vitriol we see here online os that men's critique of women is severely frowned upon in daily life and mainstream society. Even on social media, academia, and daily news, men don't see much critique of toxic femininity as much as they do with toxic masculinity. This repression that men feel towards what they have as grievances with women could be the reason why they find the perfect avenue to use as a vent here online.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/24 02:55 PM
5

They essentially portrayed feminism as an untouchable entity not to be scrutinized for its virtues , as if it's a naturally occurring phenomena in nature as opposed to its reality being an ideology in people's thinking.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/07/24 02:47 PM
2

It could be that they're more popular among the men who feel scorned or powerless. Remember the mythology of Kane and Abel; Abel's wrath was a silent admittance of defeat.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/07/24 02:15 PM
3

I don't want to make this into a whataboutism circlejerk, but this isn't unique to Islam: https://www.instagram.com/reel/C85WcmNoekj/?igsh=MW5zY3AyZXZmY3NyZA== Rife within the Ukrainian/Russian war, men are essentially used as tools of war. That's not to say that Islam isn't a flawed religion, but many of the criticism of certain flawsI see go towards it isn't really unique to it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/07/24 03:47 PM
4

He seems of a strong hustle-culture type, which just promotes competitiveness and feelings of insecurity among men. My personal opinion is that it's better to get inspired by virtues rather than of humans.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/07/24 02:58 PM
3

Moderate capitalism, like Europe used to have the first decades after WWII, can be quite beneficial. I'm not an economic scholar, but my understanding is that capitalism is sort of like a journey for a society: it can be beneficial on the short-run, but capitalism's tendency to benefit the rich catches up and that leads to the Reaganism type, or late stage capitalism.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/07/24 02:56 PM
5

I've listened to Tate, much of what he said was angry nonsense. But this in particular stood out: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=e50sJGHfLYY&pp=ygUfVGF0ZSB3aGF0IGl0IG1lYW5zIHRvIGJlIGEgYW1hbg%3D%3D Tate offers a conservative perspective of course, his idea of building yourself up isn't what we'd consider to be any sort of systemic analysis of an individual's problem. What I would guess here from his words relating to hustle culture and the obsession with the accumulation of wealth, the men who lis…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/07/24 01:26 PM
5

I would further add that it isn't just the modern problems that are caused by the far-left/right; those political extremists, being human, are also by-products of another problem which serves as the root cause. Cliche as the accusation may be: capitalism has worsened in its symptoms over the past few years, as we've seen an increase in wealth inequality, mass digitalization (fueled by aggressive business growth), skyrocketing prices, and stagnation of economic mobility. The capitalist antagonism…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/07/24 03:55 AM
28

I think role models "click" with an individual rather than actively work to gravitate attention. In other words, whether or not Andrew Tate gains the admiration of a young boy is less contingent on how charismatic Tate is and more so about how alienated from society the you g boy is. I would say that the presence of adequate role models is less important than how boys are being treated. When a young male is scorned too far, no amount of positive tole models would resonate with his emotions.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/07/24 10:23 PM
11

It seems that those subs have the same mods, or at least some software coordinates the cross-ban.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/07/24 12:13 PM
40

It's an important topic to discuss especially given at the sheer extent of pathetic lives some people are living. u/Earthmaster is the son of a wh*re motherfucker genius that does not get discouraged despite how hard his life is doing mental gymnastics to justify as to how much of a loser he is. I've seen many Hezb supporters make him cry because of his weak logic. Please take care if your mental health folks.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/07/24 02:51 AM
1

A lie is when a person's claim contradicts reality, or at-least contradicts a previous claim from them. It's not a complicated idea.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/07/24 06:56 PM
1

There is no irony or "paradox". Feminists only wanted to remove the aspects of male&female gender role that doesn't benefit women. There's no internal inconsistences when it comes to Feminism, What I sought to critique in feminism is its official doctrine, the spoken part of it. Of course, the case with feminism, much like most ideologies, is that it disavows its main talking points and often runs contrary to them. In other words, the actions of feminists contradict their spoken rules. It's the …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/07/24 06:37 PM
2

What I meant is that oligarchical societies place high-risk humans in both extremes of society: the most successful and most wretched. Proof of this is how societies where all oligarchs or all prisoners are women do not exist. Women tend to occupy sort of a comfy middle class, whereas men are at the extreme. And the more authoritarian a regime is (a prime example being Russia), the more pronounced these extremes are. In other words, it isn't the male leadership that causes tyranny, rather it's t…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/07/24 02:20 PM
2

What I meant is that oligarchical societies place high-risk humans in both extremes of society: the most successful and most wretched. Proof of this is how societies where all oligarchs or all prisoners are women do not exist. Women tend to occupy sort of a comfy middle class, whereas men are at the extreme. And the more authoritarian a regime is (a prime example being Russia), the more pronounced these extremes are.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/07/24 01:11 PM
2

That's true that tyrannical women have existed, and still do. What I tried to identify in Russia's culture and political structure had less to do with the persona (in this case it happened to be Putin), but more so about the structure of the society where it usually is the case that men are either the most successful or the most wretched. Political systems that do not prioritize egalitarianism and humanism develop into winner-take-all hierarchical systems. Of course, the seats at the top are lim…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/07/24 05:02 AM
1

It's important to note this idea with regards to a legal enactment of a conscription: it might seem as a legal and cultural victory for men's rights if conscription, as a legal concept, is abolished and forbidden in a constitution, however realities of war can prove to be more oppressive on humans' empathy towards men than we might perceive during peacetime. In other words, even if we celebrate the abolishment of conscription during peacetime, we shouldn't overlook the very high possibility that…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/06/24 04:40 AM
1

That's a good point. Artists are often of a liberal mindset, and thus artist men like Picasso could have very likely been pro-woman.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/06/24 03:59 AM
0

That was uncalled for.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/06/24 01:00 AM
1

Engels seems biased against men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/06/24 08:53 PM
6

I believe you, where I see the problem primarily is the asymmetry of support: men vehemently defend women, feminism is often worn as a badge of honor, a modern day chivalry. There are definitely groups of women who care for men, but are they in quantity equal to men who care for women? When googling "male feminists", you'll see a wide range of results in support for the existence of the searched subject. But it's a dry desert for "female masculists" search. What I've come to notice in gender dyn…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/06/24 02:53 PM
6

That's a strict conditional love depending on the closeness of a friendship or family bond. Consider this: in any feminist rally you will likely see many men standing in support. In the opposite scenario, for a MRA rally would their he a woman group present? It's very unlikely, and we've even seen feminist groups outright attack MRA events and personages.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/06/24 01:54 PM
2

True, I've noticed that the European concept of freedom has more clear parameters, such as the freedom from corporate hegemony, bankruptcy, and so on.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/06/24 09:14 PM
10

I'd say conservatives don't "care" about anyone, not even the rich. It's just that their libertarian ideology inadvertently provides a cushion for the wealthy. Notice how many famous conservatives such as Tucker, Shapiro, and Peterson constantly complain of "corporatism" or the rule of the wealthy. They behold to the idealistic "that's not capitalism that's corporatism" mantra where they'd like their ideology to play out in real life according to perfect factors.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/06/24 02:35 PM
6

It’s so ironic because conservatives call themselves “the party of family”, yet they have no problems sending their sons off to die. I'd suspect that any conservative with enough money wouldn't hesitate to use them to weasel their kid out of combat. It was the case in Vietnam were the wealthy easily dodged the draft, same case in today's Ukraine and Russia.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/06/24 12:38 PM
29

Conservatism, at least the way it is in America, is really just the law of the jungle: it cares for no one.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/06/24 12:36 PM
3

Do you expect to be taken seriously by behaving angrily?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/06/24 04:05 PM
4

To address your point with regards to the patriarchal development: for one reason or another, men are risk takers and are more likely to put themselves in harms way for gain and profit. Political systems that do not prioritize egalitarianism and humanism develop into winner-take-all hierarchical systems. Of course, the seats at the top are limited, and they're most likely to end up in the very few hands that are daring enough to pursue them. We can see how an extremely authoritarian nation like …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/06/24 04:28 AM
6

I couldn't find a scholarly discussion on this, thus I've restored to a less trusted source: I had a look onto this conversation, which suggests that military upwards mobility was heavily influenced by either nepotism, wealth, or fatal acts of bravery during battles. I would say your second point is correct that the military hold great power, but ultimately the fruits of war and conquest where the property of the state which funded the army to begin with. Moreover, I wouldn't automatically sugge…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/06/24 11:39 PM
16

I do think it's because men were always throughout history doing the jobs which had the most upward mobility (though upward mobility was rare). I assume you define "patriarchy" as a political system where very few men own the majority of power. It is true that most well paying jobs where controlled by men, but it is false to say that most men had well paying jobs throughout history. And the lack if emphasis on this apex fallacy pins a great deal of innocent men in an evil spotlight. The most imp…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/06/24 10:07 PM
-3

Not necessarily. Many women are radical feminists because of the abusive men that they willingly tie themselves to.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/06/24 10:00 PM
12

Therapy is a silent admittance that the fault is in the individual: the belief that struggling young black men "need therapy" is a perspective that it's not the system that's to blame but rather the "black culture" that brews in the mind of youngsters is a good example of the bootstrap mentality that shifts the blame away from any systemic structures. For this, I don't believe therapy is the solution in the vast majority of cases, and this is speaking far beyond just the problems of men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/06/24 03:13 PM
5

Many countries aren't, but I see that we have made great strides in terms of developing the language of democracy; the European Union is a great example of that. Many countries in the Arab gulf region are progressing as well.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/06/24 01:14 PM
53

One of the main concepts of radical feminism is the idea that women have suffered holistically and systemically at the hands of men, and that societies throughout all human history have been designed by men, for men. This concept contains some truth, but taken to an extreme represents a blatant ahistorical analysis which demonizes men, and calls for unfair "reparations" for women at the expense of men. Looking at the voting rights gap between men and women shows us that this problem affected bot…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/06/24 10:42 AM
5

Seriously I wanna know lol
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/06/24 07:41 PM
3

These studies are mostly made through surveys and self-assessments. It's very unreliable.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/06/24 07:40 PM
15

This is why we need a ministry for men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/06/24 07:40 PM
3

I think OP was trying to dismantle the common idea that men who aren't having luck in dating are immoral or are repulsing women with their apathy/arrogance. You're trying to shift the narrative in a different direction here by completely ignoring the above detail.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/24 07:35 PM
2

We analyze African American crimes as being a by-product of a society that alienates africans from American culture, economics, and legal system much due to historical consequences. We never apply such logic to men's misdemeanors, that's not to say personal responsibility isn't important, but a systemic analysis is always nessecary to understand why certain people are the way they are.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/06/24 09:16 PM
2

I'm genuinely surprised at how little society asks this question when discussing male problems.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/06/24 04:02 PM
2

It is factual that men are more risk taking: They concluded that the literature "clearly" indicated that "male participants are more likely to take risks than female participants" There is also a correlation between risk-taking behaviors and suicide accomplishment: Results: Compared with HCs, individuals with SA reported higher risk-taking and suicidal behavior scores. The risk-taking questionnaire yielded a four-factor solution: Thrill and sensation seeking; Cautious procedure; Cautious decisio…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/06/24 01:16 PM
1

It is factual that men are more risk taking: They concluded that the literature "clearly" indicated that "male participants are more likely to take risks than female participants") There is also a correlation between risk-taking behaviors and suicide accomplishment: Results: Compared with HCs, individuals with SA reported higher risk-taking and suicidal behavior scores. The risk-taking questionnaire yielded a four-factor solution: Thrill and sensation seeking; Cautious procedure; Cautious decisi…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/06/24 01:13 PM
2

This is getting downvoted but there's some truth to it. We could be more nuanced here, perhaps it goes hand in hand: men's risk taking behavior could lead to misandry which reinforces some of men's reckless behavior.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/06/24 01:01 PM
1

It is still the case that as a ratio between men and women the former commits suicide far more often in all cultures around the world. Thus the consistency of the gender ratio here in relation to suicide shows us that biology overrides culture.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/06/24 01:00 PM
4

The communist manifesto was a reductionist propaganda piece made by Marx to appeal to the masses. A more holistic view of Marx's philosophy can be viewed here: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/marx/ Marx is famously reluctant to say much about the detailed arrangements of the communist alternative that he sought to bring into being, arguing that it would arise through historical processes, and was not the realisation of a pre-determined plan or blueprint.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/06/24 07:25 AM
1

Peterson has useful lecture from previous years, though he definitely lost his marbles around 2019.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/06/24 06:24 PM
1

It's not about not wanting to pay off a partner's debt, it's about Ramsey encouraging men to get married without proper vetting of a person and not having high enough standards. You gave an example of your partner taking a loan for an important reason. I respect that. Then what about so many other women who get loans for petty reasons such as irresponsible spending or a useless college degree? Why "man up" and get married to an irresponsible person simply for the sake of "manning up"? Again, it'…
/r/MensRights10/06/24 01:20 PM
3

The bias is when he places responsibility on only one gender while absolving that responsibility from women.
/r/MensRights10/06/24 05:30 AM
2

Depends on which denomination of Christianity.
/r/MensRights10/06/24 05:29 AM
23

We call these types of men tradcucks.
/r/MensRights09/06/24 03:48 PM
12

Yes you are correct, the culture wars have been aggravated since 2008. Iceland was egalitarian enough to put the senior businesspeople who were complicit in the economic failure in jail.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/06/24 10:54 AM
11

Could be more than that; the world is increasingly globalized, and people react to their feeling that their culture is eroding. Moreover, economic turbulences have occurred long after 2008, such as the crash following the sudden lockdowns of 2020.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/06/24 09:51 AM
20

Human beings are changing and never stagnant. Firstly, I don't see any indicators that suggest that a majority of men are far-right; being conservative and being far-right are not one and the same. Those far-right groups are just reactionaries; it's a trend that comes and goes as they react to an outsider, it certainly isn't the norm in any society.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/06/24 07:06 AM
1

telling men what they should not be is straight up not helpful or good at encouraging change. I think it's fine to bring good role-models to young males, and having them see right from wrong. I really like the idea of how cartoons like Samurai Jack teach youngsters the meaning of virtue and strength. But yes I can see your point: men can be conditioned to be selfless soldiers, even by progressives, and that's undoubtedly harmful.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/06/24 02:04 PM
10

It's only viewed as toxic when it's not toughness displayed to defend feminism.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/06/24 02:02 PM
5

I think the feminism of economic principles is good. For example, the idea that women having equal labor opportunity to men being better for society holistically is a sound idea. Where I detest feminism is it's victimhood ideology that seeks to cast a culture war against men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/06/24 02:01 PM
2

You have my full support.
/r/MensRights06/06/24 03:21 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter