TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Illustrious_Bus9486 Archive

View 6 posts and 599 comments by Illustrious_Bus9486 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
56

My view on abortion? Wherever a woman can get an abortion w/o the father's consent, the father should be able to get a "paper abortion" w/o the woman's consent. Equal rights baby.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen28/09/24 07:06 PM
0

The only implications in either statement are in your mind.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/09/24 02:25 PM
1

How about, "2.5 million years of homind evolution has made men the protectors of and providers for women's needs?"
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/09/24 01:29 PM
-2

Is saying, "2.5 million years of homind evolution has made women naturally hypergamous" a violation?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/09/24 10:42 PM
1

Where did I say anything about balance?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/09/24 05:47 PM
5

You claim to support the 4A but, previously, you said that you support police forcing someone, who has committed no crime, to surrender their person in order to check them for possible warrants. How do you mentally resolve this conflict?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/09/24 01:06 PM
94

I always find it ironic that self proclaimed conservative women spout the need to return to "traditional values" while doing something that those values wouldn't allow.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/08/24 06:41 PM
3

????
/r/MensRights07/08/24 04:35 PM
3

This why tell men that men and women can not be friends; there will always be an emotional imbalance. And that given the opportunity, every woman will cheat.
/r/MensRights07/08/24 04:32 PM
5

They couch brainwashing in phrases like "instilling national pride."
/r/MensRights07/08/24 10:38 AM
1

Stop thinking life is a romance movie or a fairytale. It isn't.
/r/MensRights06/08/24 07:40 PM
2

Could you expand upon your last sentence? In particular "this line?" Are you your referring to a specific sentence or to a line of thought? What, specifically, in the Russian Constitution makes their courts defend against discrimination towards men?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/08/24 01:57 AM
2

Unless I'm blind, you forgot to include the URL link.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/08/24 01:50 AM
1

We will support Ukraine as long as it takes (for the last Ukrainian male to die) - Joe Biden
/r/MensRights06/08/24 12:31 AM
1

Another article about how women suffer more from war than men.
/r/MensRights06/08/24 12:23 AM
5

Actually, they did get the ERA passed, but it has yet be ratified by enough states to adopt it. Most states see the Constitution, as is, and the Civil Rights Act of 1964 as more than sufficient. As far as post 1985 sex, even I didn't stop. I just became even more selective in accepting the offers I received. And they were still there; many of them. I didn't like condoms as they hurt (I thought "Magnum" was brand - I didn't know it was a size until many years later). However, I'd wager that condo…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen05/08/24 05:44 PM
2

Think what you wish.
/r/MensRights04/08/24 08:25 PM
3

Yes. It is often discussed and called a "Paper Abortion."
/r/MensRights04/08/24 08:21 PM
15

Is she mowing the yard? Is she making sure the cars are properly serviced? Is she the one cleaning the gutters? Is she the one clearing a clogged drain? The households chores men do are different but no less important.
/r/MensRights04/08/24 05:44 PM
9

The party ended in 1985 with the first confirmation of heterosexual transmission of aids. We were all raw dogging until then.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen04/08/24 04:59 PM
10

TLDR at the bottom I'm the same age as her and I saw things quite differently. I, and I'd argue that most men, went to the clubs to socialize and meet potential partners. There was no other place to meet. There was no internet. There were no more Chads or Tyronnes than there are today. I'd even argue that, as a percentage of men, there were fewer. One must also realize that by the time we reached the age of majority, most states had raised the drinking age to 19. So we couldn't legally be in the…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen04/08/24 03:48 PM
2

What is the alimony cap?
/r/MensRights03/08/24 09:38 PM
2

It is said that a study was done comparing historical female monarchs and male monarchs. It was found that female monarchs were 25% more likely to start wars.
/r/MensRights03/08/24 08:18 PM
-1

Poor baby.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/08/24 02:09 PM
1

How did you determine my words as being antagonist?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/08/24 09:32 PM
1

How do you determine calmness from the written word?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/08/24 07:49 PM
4

No, they aren't. And if you've not heard women complaining about it, you must be blind and deaf.
/r/MensRights01/08/24 09:55 PM
0

What has this to do with male advocacy? If you are feminist, then why are you reaching out to men to solve your personal issues?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/08/24 06:39 PM
1

Not a great sub from which to gain insight.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/08/24 06:22 PM
1

Yes, because it is always used only in reference to jobs they want. You never hear about it reference to construction or other physically demanding jobs.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/08/24 06:02 PM
-1

There are others. Most of which have been taken over by, or now cater heavily to, simps and feminists. One that hasn't, yet, is r/itsthatbad.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/07/24 01:19 PM
10

The inequalities of family courts. Inequalities of rape laws. How false rape accusations destroy men's lives Lack of resources for male domestic violence victims
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/07/24 12:49 PM
17

Paper abortion Mandatory paternity testing
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/07/24 03:15 AM
1

No.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/07/24 03:03 PM
0

Because it is irrelevant.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/07/24 02:46 PM
1

What claim did I make?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/07/24 07:29 PM
2

Why? The question posed a fictious scenario and I answered with my opinion. I made no claim of actual causality.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/07/24 03:14 PM
2

I am not responsible for you think.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/07/24 02:56 PM
2

The general term is birth control which includes sponges, IUDs, and other forms. That is why I was being specific.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/07/24 02:26 PM
0

In large part, yes.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/07/24 02:21 PM
-2

Look at what women have become since.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/07/24 01:55 PM
-1

Hormonal birth control would not exist.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/07/24 01:39 PM
0

LMAO
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/07/24 02:43 AM
1

You didn't answer my question.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/07/24 02:15 AM
0

So, you don't consider a licensed psychologist who has been teaching his trade at the university level for many years as a professional?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/07/24 02:48 PM
-1

Read the qualification I placed in the parenthesis.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/07/24 02:27 PM
-4

The US is not a democracy. It is a republic. A democracy is like 2 wolves and sheep deciding what have for lunch.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/07/24 02:38 AM
-4

You have quoted anything that supports your assertion.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/07/24 10:18 PM
-4

How do you know what I saw him saying was in reference to any study and not his own clinical practice?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/07/24 09:29 PM
-6

Quote where I said he is a valid source.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/07/24 09:27 PM
-10

Where did I claim he was?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/07/24 06:18 PM
1

No.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/07/24 05:11 PM
-17

In 2006 Norah Vincent wrote a book called "Self Made Man" about her experiences passing as a man. Dr. Jordan Peterson (the only professional I've heard speak on the subject) says that most cases of gender dysphoria self-resolve by adulthood. So he would disagree with what your parents did. In 2016 Casey Jaye made a documentary called "The Red Pill" which chronicles her journey out of feminism to becoming a men's rights activist. She also did interviews after. The book, some of the interviews, an…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/07/24 04:17 PM
3

If I also consider the hog ring in her nose, my guess would be one word: OINK.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen21/07/24 03:40 PM
4

My family, primarily, raised hogs when I was young (a long before hog confinments became a thing). So, I tend to call them "hog rings." Personally, I think the comparison is much more apt.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen21/07/24 03:38 PM
8

I just did a quick search. This is all per the CDC. 78% of all successful suicides are men. This leaves 22% which are both men and women. This leaves us with an undefined smaller percentage of men who were unsuccessful. Men in that undefined group are categorized into those who attended therapy afterwards and those who didn't. Those who attended therapy were 26% less likely to commit suicide than those who didn't attend therapy. I found no information about men who attended therapy before a suic…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/07/24 04:14 PM
12

This could be an interesting study; the number of men seeking MH referrals and how many receive them as compared to the same for women. If the records are accurately kept, it might show systemic bias within the system.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/07/24 01:13 PM
17

Just post/comment a time or two in there and you will likely find yourself joining us in the "banned from menslib sub" club.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/07/24 11:43 AM
7

Sure they can. A woman can get any man to whom she has access. She need only do 3 things. First, she must become useful to that man. A man never discards anything that is useful to him. Second, she must be the most enthusiastic, sluttiest version of herself that she has ever been or can be. She must be more enthusiastic and sluttier than every other woman he has ever been with. Third, and this is the deal breaker, she must remove all disrespectful language and mannerisms from herself. This inclu…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen13/07/24 01:46 PM
14

Sounds like a feminist wrote it. I can't give much credence to someone who uses Reddit as their primary information source.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/07/24 10:40 AM
–

Sounds like a simp wrote it. I can't give much credence to someone who uses Reddit as their primary information source.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/07/24 12:02 AM
-11

Your assumption means nothing to me.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/07/24 02:31 AM
-1

Define empathy gap.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/07/24 12:29 AM
11

It is "interesting" that they feel that in order to pass it that they must sneak it into the NDAA rather than making it a stand alone bill amending the Selective Service Act.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/07/24 11:57 PM
24

You can't even do that on some subs. In an askmen sub there was a woman asking what she did wrong. I replied using her own words that she was using to defend her actions as an explanation of what she did wrong. The mods deted the post with a message to me saying that I was being unkind. Since I used her own words, they couldn't claim it was unture. They just didn't like the way I said it. I was tempted to reply to their message with "The truth hurts." But, I realized that would be pointless.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen09/07/24 07:09 PM
1

One branch of a military complaining about another. What novel idea!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/07/24 05:26 PM
3

I'm not convinced that you made a sound argument against Orwell's position because you used the standards that came out of (after) the atrocities of WW2 as a guide. As far as weapons being diverted, that is categorically false. The weapons manufactured and used during WW2 were directed at their intended targets. There were plenty of them. You claim that those weapons could have been directed at u-boats instead. The use of submarines was a relatively new means of naval warfare at the time. Time w…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/07/24 06:10 AM
8

Having seen many similar posts and comments on this subject, I would venture a guess that there were an equal, or more, number of comments infantalizing the adult female by calling the man pedo and/or a groomer.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/07/24 05:04 AM
0

I'll take a stab at identifying the culprit. Hormonal Birth Control
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/07/24 09:24 PM
1

Why the men?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/07/24 08:50 PM
1

Really? Let's examine your position. You have been rendered unconscious by the smoke from your burning building and are a able to escape. Who would you prefer to find you and carry you out: a man or a woman?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/07/24 06:20 PM
2

Interesting. How can one describe something as positive with being able to describe its opposite?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/07/24 06:07 PM
0

Interesting. How can one describe something as positive with being able to describe its opposite?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/07/24 06:07 PM
1

Name a negative form of masculinity.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/07/24 06:00 PM
11

From your lengthy list, it appears that you are support female privledge, not equality. How many shelters for for abused men have you supported? What have you done for men to have an equal "paper abortion?" What have you done to make female child rapists to be treated the same way as male child rapists; not only in the legal system but in the media?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/07/24 12:12 PM
11

I can't help but wonder how long ago this was written, because the future (as described in the OP) is now.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/07/24 12:27 PM
1

Since one can not hear what you wrote, how did you indicate that?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/07/24 07:47 PM
8

Since this isn't that sub, it doesn't matter what they would do. BTW, I'm already banned from there.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/07/24 07:44 PM
3

ML?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/07/24 07:42 PM
26

A better question would be, what issues do you deem important that we do not discuss?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/07/24 07:17 PM
32

Welcome to the banned from r/menslib club.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/07/24 12:46 AM
3

I agree, but some of them just drone on and on. It's like they are meeting a word count requirement for an essay.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/07/24 01:25 PM
19

I state it more succinctly. "Childless men should never date single/divorced mothers. You will never come first in the relationship. There will be drama. You will be expected to shoulder all the responsibilities for those children without having the same level of authority over them. Besides, what man wants to raise the children of another man?"
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen01/07/24 01:07 PM
0

No.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/07/24 12:01 AM
-4

Vote Gold. Don't tread on anyone.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/06/24 11:12 AM
1

Gary Johnson (2x), Jo Jorgenson, Chase Oliver. The only votes I wasted were the ones prior to 2012.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/06/24 11:10 AM
18

Some of us never heard of it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/06/24 03:22 AM
30

Where are all the good men? She ate them.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen28/06/24 02:07 PM
41

They aren't hiding. They are running, away from her.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen28/06/24 01:38 PM
0

One can only be bitter if one feels like a victim; regardless of their sex.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/06/24 02:10 PM
-13

Don't feel like a victim.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/06/24 12:53 PM
5

I'm a 63yo disabled veteran. I've been in the VA system since 1989. I have recently decided that I will refuse to see female doctors. Not as an MRA issue, but for my own medical safety. Over the last 10-12 years, it has become clear to me that the outcomes I have endured with female doctors has been overwhelmingly negative as compared to those from male doctors. I even had one who slipped up and said, "I never believed your migraines are real." She said this despite clear medical evidence that I…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/06/24 12:52 PM
5

The M2 and BAW movements made it much worse.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/06/24 03:59 PM
7

Elimination of no-fault divorce means that there must be some sort of reason, such as infidelity, before a divorce would be granted; just being unhappy won't fly. No-fault divorce incentivizes women to break the marriage contract. The marriage contract is the only type of contract where one party is rewarded for breaching the contract. Custody is already sexist as it favors the mother over the father. If you read what I wrote about this in its entirety, you will notice that I said the default sh…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/06/24 03:57 PM
6

Here are some issues. Paper Abortion Elimination of Common Law marriage Elimination of no-fault divorce Default position of courts should be 50/50 custody of children. If not going so far as to considering the default to award full custody to the father. Mandatory DNA testing to determine parentage.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/06/24 02:00 PM
6

In her usage, it seems to mean "unfocused."
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen15/06/24 08:16 PM
2

It is easy to tell that you never served in the military.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/06/24 10:18 PM
9

They might be...until they hit the wall.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/06/24 12:43 AM
1

When you answer for someone else, it is (unless you are a mind reader).
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/06/24 01:18 AM
1

This shows that you aren't. So, your thoughts are irrelevant.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/06/24 12:32 AM
1

Are you a mind reader?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/06/24 12:18 AM
4

How old are you now?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen06/06/24 10:48 PM
8

I was thinking more like Indianna Jones crawling through cavernous cobweb laden caves. 😉
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen06/06/24 07:11 PM
0

Have I claimed to have read the study?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/06/24 03:01 PM
12

She also doesn't understand that no 20yo man will want a 60yo woman. No 30yo man will want a 70yo woman. Etc., etc.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen06/06/24 02:31 PM
2

Name 3 of these "misogynistic groups" which you are describing.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/06/24 02:28 PM
6

I saw a show with a psychologist (Dr. Drew?) on it. The shrink mentioned that term was first used to, and only intended for, describe the behavior of a subset of male prison populations as the study was done solely on male prison populations.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/06/24 01:48 PM
13

She forgets the opposite side of that coin. Women should date men 2 generations older than them, i.e. 20yo female should date a 60yo man.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen06/06/24 01:34 PM
0

https://www.google.com/search?q=childhood+outcomes+of+single+mother+vs+single+father+vs+2+parent+homes&oq=&gs_lcrp=EgZjaHJvbWUqCQgAECMYJxjqAjIJCAAQIxgnGOoCMgkIARAjGCcY6gIyCQgCECMYJxjqAjIJCAMQIxgnGOoCMgkIBBAjGCcY6gIyCQgFECMYJxjqAjIJCAYQIxgnGOoCMgkIBxAjGCcY6gIyCQgIECMYJxjqAjIJCAkQIxgnGOoCMgkIChAjGCcY6gIyCQgLECMYJxjqAjIJCAwQIxgnGOoCMg8IDRAuGCcYxwEY6gIY0QMyCQgOECMYJxjqAjIRCA8QABgDGEIYjwEYtAIY6gIyDwgQEC4YAxiPARi0AhjqAjIRCBEQABgDGEIYjwEYtAIY6gIyDwgSEC4YAxiPARi0AhjqAjIRCBMQABgDGEIYjwEYtAIY6gLSAQYtMWowa…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/06/24 03:48 AM
-3

Google is your friend.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/06/24 02:57 AM
5

No.
/r/MensRights06/06/24 02:24 AM
-2

Yes.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/06/24 01:59 AM
67

The only solution she offered was to throw out 2.5 million years of hominid evolution to try and make boys more like girls. She only begins looking at what has happened in the last 5 years and attempts to make sound longer by using the phrase "half decade." She almost makes, but fails, to make the association of evolution on how humans instinctively treat infant males and females differently. We do so because the world is a vastly different place for each. The only time she uses the word "mascul…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/06/24 03:30 PM
15

As I always say, never half-ass anything when, with a little effort, you can fuck things up completely.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen03/06/24 04:51 PM
1

Interesting. He was saying that about the same time I stepped away from dating.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/05/24 07:39 PM
2

Another propaganda piece from CNN.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/05/24 01:06 PM
5

Link a definition from a reputable dictionary site to that word.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/05/24 07:50 PM
-2

The truth hurts, doesn't it?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/05/24 06:24 PM
-2

So, you answered a question that wasn't directed at you or at anyone in general? How entitled you must feel.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/05/24 06:14 PM
-1

You didn't write it?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/05/24 06:12 PM
4

However, unlike yours, it is a real word.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/05/24 06:11 PM
4

No. BTW, I'm 63.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/05/24 04:09 PM
3

Did you mean "masculinists?"
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/05/24 04:08 PM
20

The new definition that you cited requires nonconsensual PENETRATION of the vagina, anus, or mouth. So, except for the use of penetrating objects on a male, it still only applies to females.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/05/24 08:06 AM
1

Thanks
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/05/24 07:44 PM
2

Well, DAH!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/05/24 12:56 PM
3

Too schnookered to read that. Have fun!
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen23/05/24 12:55 PM
-5

You are not the person to whom I was speaking.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/05/24 12:48 PM
-26

As a doctor, you will have many female associates from which to choose. You do know the stories about sexual escapades in the medical field? Especially the traveling personnel? There is a reason for those stories. You will have ample opportunity to fuck 'em.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/05/24 04:46 AM
0

That is because psychology and sociology are soft sciences (others are anthropology and political science). Soft sciences are characterized by them not using measurable criteria, which makes their studies all but impossible to replicate.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/05/24 12:15 PM
5

Could also be a violation of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/05/24 01:36 AM
30

Well written and reasoned article. 2 things surprise me: it was written by a self-proclaimed feminist and that was written in 2016.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/05/24 01:59 AM
14

"Reformed" 304.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen05/05/24 08:34 PM
13

And she's a drunk.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen30/04/24 01:04 AM
16

Women do the right thing with the wrong men.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen29/04/24 06:39 PM
4

You should Google "Norah Vincent." Maybe even read her book "Self Made Man." BTW, welcome to the everyday life of a man.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/04/24 03:45 PM
6

Good.
/r/MensRights24/04/24 01:36 PM
4

End the engagement.
/r/MensRights24/04/24 12:06 PM
0

Because one man can impregnate multiple women. A woman can only have one pregnancy at a time.
/r/MensRights23/04/24 10:21 PM
2

Hypergamy
/r/MensRights23/04/24 10:16 PM
1

Obviously
/r/MensRights22/04/24 10:11 PM
-2

Then, your selected username is untrue.
/r/MensRights22/04/24 09:41 PM
1

Given the opportunity, every woman will cheat.
/r/MensRights22/04/24 09:36 PM
1

Given the opportunity, every woman will cheat.
/r/MensRights22/04/24 09:27 PM
2

There is, at least, one guy sueing(sp?) over this. https://www.foxla.com/news/are-we-dating-the-same-guy-facebook-lawsuit-la
/r/MensRights22/04/24 04:43 PM
3

Men should never show any sign of weakness to a woman; it will be weaponized against him at some point in the future.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/04/24 01:05 AM
1

I don't, but I don't use tiktok.
/r/MensRights21/04/24 02:07 AM
1

I got curious and actually researched this a while back. With one outlier, common law marriage laws were all instituted after the BC pill became available and the sexual revolution began. The one outlier surprised me; Oklahoma instituted theirs in 1959.
/r/MensRights20/04/24 04:00 PM
1

No. Look at how they react when they hit the wall.
/r/MensRights20/04/24 12:17 PM
6

Opt out. There will always be an a-la-carte menu.
/r/MensRights19/04/24 12:14 PM
3

Become indifferent.
/r/MensRights18/04/24 02:16 AM
7

In my state, cohabitation is not required. The only thing required to establish a common law marriage is that you represent yourselves as husband and wife.
/r/MensRights16/04/24 05:06 AM
16

There is no such thing.
/r/MensRights16/04/24 05:04 AM
66

Just say no.
/r/MensRights10/04/24 07:27 PM
53

Become indifferent to them.
/r/MensRights08/04/24 10:21 PM
9

Never.
/r/MensRights06/04/24 04:17 PM
4

That is an ad hominem attack.
/r/MensRights27/03/24 02:30 PM
6

Libertarian
/r/MensRights26/03/24 12:55 PM
26

Never show any sign of weakness to a woman; it will be weaponized against you at some point in the future.
/r/MensRights25/03/24 08:14 PM
5

Ignore them and await your grade.
/r/MensRights24/03/24 10:08 PM
1

FWIW, they violated federal law by not providing you with hotel accommodations because they delayed you overnight.
/r/MensRights24/03/24 04:13 PM
24

2.5 million years of hominid evolution has made women hypergamous.
/r/MensRights23/03/24 09:58 PM
1

This is an example of why cops need to carry liability insurance.
/r/MensRights22/03/24 01:40 PM
10

The first thing to do is to stop voting for the warmongers.
/r/MensRights21/03/24 12:24 PM
31

Rinse them out in the sink.
/r/MensRights20/03/24 05:07 PM
9

All that is needed.
/r/MensRights19/03/24 11:40 PM
9

Wrong.
/r/MensRights19/03/24 11:38 PM
17

Because that is just how it is. Are you asserting that a man is, or should be, able to force a woman to carry a child to term? If so, I have no problem with your position, but that isn't what you've previously stated.
/r/MensRights19/03/24 11:37 PM
10

The rights are not equal. A woman can terminate her parental responsibilities by aborting the child, even against the man's wishes. A man should have an equal right to terminate his parental responsibilities.
/r/MensRights19/03/24 11:34 PM
15

Yes, it is. Both were responsible for the act. In your scenario, only the woman gets to choose whether to abort.
/r/MensRights19/03/24 11:23 PM
28

Yes. It is called equal rights.
/r/MensRights19/03/24 11:12 PM
27

Sure I can, you just expressed a different set of standards on abortion from men to women. What did I say that was hypocritical?
/r/MensRights19/03/24 11:10 PM
4

A man should never show any sign of weakness to a woman; it will be weaponized against him at some point in the future.
/r/MensRights19/03/24 11:05 PM
41

You are a hypocrite.
/r/MensRights19/03/24 11:00 PM
30

Do you believe that a woman should be able to abort a child that she doesn't want and a man does?
/r/MensRights19/03/24 10:50 PM
25

Do you think that men should be able to do a "paper abortion" if he doesn't want a child and the woman does?
/r/MensRights19/03/24 10:46 PM
4

I've been going to join, but I've been waiting until after I join the procrastinators club.
/r/MensRights18/03/24 07:22 PM
41

Preselection bias
/r/MensRights18/03/24 03:29 PM
3

If they do find them, they will just be fed into the meat grinder.
/r/MensRights16/03/24 09:01 PM
3

As a Libertarian, I'm loath to endorse anything that allows for more government interference into person lives, but as long as it is done at the state level, I could support this; barely. I'd prefer that men learn to demand a paternity test before signing the birth certificate. We just need to educate boys and young men on this as they grow up.
/r/MensRights16/03/24 07:04 PM
6

Back to my original point. Legalizing the sale of something while making the purchase illegal is just virtue signaling because it defacto makes the sale illegal.
/r/MensRights15/03/24 05:58 PM
2

How does this refute what I said? Being charged and released after determining the were victims actually supports my position.
/r/MensRights15/03/24 05:05 PM
1

You're missing the point. If a woman wants the child but the man doesn't, he is still in the hook for child support. If the woman doesn't want the child and the man does, he has no say in her aborting the child.
/r/MensRights15/03/24 04:22 PM
2

He thought he was protected by her use of the pill.
/r/MensRights15/03/24 04:10 PM
4

Irrelevant to my question.
/r/MensRights15/03/24 04:09 PM
1

No matter how you rationalize it, you are giving the woman all the power while denying a man equal power.
/r/MensRights15/03/24 04:08 PM
2

Not for a woman. A woman has multiple options after sex. A man doesn't.
/r/MensRights15/03/24 03:46 PM
2

What you disagree with is the nanny state. LBJ's "Great Society" has incentivized single motherhood. Work to change that.
/r/MensRights15/03/24 03:45 PM
1

How is her telling him she was on the pill him agreeing to unsafe sex?
/r/MensRights15/03/24 03:34 PM
5

If a woman wants to abort but the father wants the child, should he be able to force her to carry it to term?
/r/MensRights15/03/24 03:32 PM
13

Not enough. Women have been known to grab the discarded condom, fish the semen out of it, and use it to impregnate themselves. Since flushing can damage sewage systems, the best option is to rinse out the condom and dispose of it in trash.
/r/MensRights15/03/24 03:29 PM
2

But only the mother has the choice whether to bring a child to birth or to abort the child. Neither the father nor the child has any say in the matter. Paper abortion for men is the closest the father has to having an equal say as the mother.
/r/MensRights15/03/24 03:24 PM
3

Victims of trafficking can report being trafficked now. So, how does this change anything? How does it prevent it?
/r/MensRights15/03/24 02:56 PM
3

As I said, not the whole state.
/r/MensRights14/03/24 09:31 PM
14

Emphasize that the first word of this shortened phrase is involuntary.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/03/24 09:14 PM
2

Only in certain counties, not the whole state.
/r/MensRights14/03/24 09:09 PM
8

Your last sentence is another example of a logical fallacy. How can allowing the sale of something discourage the use of that thing?
/r/MensRights14/03/24 06:44 PM
-1

I said "few men."
/r/MensRights14/03/24 04:08 PM
3

Not yet. The title clearly says that Maine will be the first.
/r/MensRights14/03/24 02:29 PM
11

There is no shifting. Currently, both selling and purchasing is punishable by law. It is nothing but avoidance for the selling party. Vitue signaling.
/r/MensRights14/03/24 02:23 PM
44

This is full of logical fallacies. Such as: how can selling something be legal if the purchasing of that same thing is illegal? That just makes the selling defacto illegal. This leads to a second logical fallacy: how can legalized sales improve the income of the seller if it is illegal for the buyer to make the purchase? The only thing this does is virtue signal.
/r/MensRights14/03/24 02:18 PM
11

I don't know if it was intentional (consciously or subconsciously) or not, but it seems that you are using the word "people" to soften the truth several times in your OP. Here is the first example: "The fact that people make inceldom all about women and how women feel is very telling." The correct word to use would be the subset of people called women. Few men would use the word "incel" disparagingly as even those not in the incel subset know that they could become a member of that subset at any…
/r/MensRights14/03/24 01:21 PM
3

Do you remember when the NFL first announced that it was going to allow female referees? There is reason the most popular meme running around said, "The NFL's first female referee throws a flag for something that happened 3 years ago."
/r/MensRights13/03/24 11:44 PM
14

Irrelevant to what I explained. The Council on Foreign Relations agrees with what I just explained from my memory. https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/taliban-afghanistan#:~:text=How%20were%20the%20Taliban%20formed,Services%20Intelligence%20directorate%20(ISI).
/r/MensRights13/03/24 04:53 PM
100

And history. The Taliban was created by the Mujahideen. The Mujahideen was created by the CIA. Prior to the Taliban coming to power, women were allowed to go to to school, wear modern clothing, etc. After it came to power, all that was banned. Does that sound familiar? If not, it should. Look at Iran and Lebanon, and you'll see the same history repeated.
/r/MensRights13/03/24 01:45 PM
26

That isn't always true. My narcissistic mother was an example.
/r/MensRights13/03/24 02:46 AM
1

It has been debunked many times.
/r/MensRights12/03/24 03:16 PM
321

That accusation alone could have destroyed you and your business. Divorce her. Take what hit you must. Rebuild.
/r/MensRights12/03/24 01:04 PM
1

I'm not responsible for what you think my single word response said.
/r/MensRights12/03/24 11:16 AM
1

What have I said that led you to believe that I don't care?
/r/MensRights12/03/24 11:11 AM
1

How many mass media articles are there on each?
/r/MensRights12/03/24 02:28 AM
2

The first sentence out her mouth was a lie.
/r/MensRights12/03/24 12:12 AM
2

Yes
/r/MensRights12/03/24 12:05 AM
3

Feminism
/r/MensRights11/03/24 07:20 PM
0

What did I say which led you to that conclusion?
/r/MensRights11/03/24 06:06 PM
0

I would?
/r/MensRights11/03/24 03:03 PM
2

2 disparity different questions l.
/r/MensRights10/03/24 08:07 PM
2

JC! Are you really that daft?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/03/24 11:27 AM
-12

WTF?
/r/MensRights10/03/24 11:15 AM
-29

And?
/r/MensRights10/03/24 11:01 AM
-1

Dah
/r/MensRights10/03/24 10:59 AM
7

I only read a bit. Are you really that ignorant?
/r/MensRights10/03/24 09:10 AM
-6

And?
/r/MensRights10/03/24 08:59 AM
9

She is "funny."
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen10/03/24 08:43 AM
1

Dah...
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/03/24 08:03 AM
1

Yes
/r/MensRights10/03/24 07:58 AM
1

What is your point?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/03/24 07:51 AM
1

And?
/r/MensRights09/03/24 10:07 PM
87

My response to the "men lack emotional intelligence" type arguments is to ask, "Who has more emotional intelligence; a person who reacts to every emotion they have or a person who controls their reactions to those emotions?"
/r/MensRights09/03/24 09:19 PM
1

Be aware of the common law marriage laws in your state. Always get a cohabitation agreement before living together. Never represent yourselves as husband and wife. In my state, cohabitation is not required to penalize a man with the full effect of divorce. A couple need only to represent themselves as husband and wife to be considered married by common law. Note also that I live in a decidedly "red" state and these laws exist even here. I don't know when these laws were written, but I became awa…
/r/MensRights09/03/24 01:27 PM
10

I'll address your edit. It is part of the feminist tropes "men should be more in touch with their feminine side" and "men should be more in touch with their emotions." Whenever I'm faced with those type of statements, I just ask "Who is more in touch with their emotions: a person who reacts to every emotion they are feeling as they feel them or the person who can control their reactions to the emotions they feel?"
/r/MensRights07/03/24 03:42 PM
2

The first step is to abolish the unconstitutional federal Dept. of Education. Prior to its establishment, states competed to provide the best education possible for their children. My home state of Iowa was consistently ranked #1 or #2 year after year. This was achieved through standardized testing: the Iowa Tests of Basic Skills. These tests were given at various points during the year and used not so much to test the students' knowledge as they were to identify areas in which an individual chi…
/r/MensRights06/03/24 03:07 PM
3

Shared on both my FB and X feeds.
/r/MensRights05/03/24 03:04 PM
12

It has been repeatedly debunked.
/r/MensRights04/03/24 11:31 PM
20

Because 2.5 million years of hominid evolution has made women hypergamous.
/r/MensRights04/03/24 07:00 PM
17

It is the basis for the phrase "Don't shoot the messenger." In ancient times, rulers used to kill their messengers when the messenger had to deliver bad news.
/r/MensRights04/03/24 01:38 PM
152

It is called an ad hominem attack. When they can't attack the message, they attack the messenger.
/r/MensRights04/03/24 01:18 PM
5

The woman who wrote that doesn't seem to understand that she must offer more than sex to a man, otherwise sex is all she will receive.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen04/03/24 02:33 AM
2

Fraud
/r/MensRights04/03/24 02:09 AM
21

I don't care what they think.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/03/24 12:04 AM
5

Why would they want anything more from a divorced mom?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen03/03/24 09:58 PM
1

It is because boys are not being raised to be men.
/r/MensRights03/03/24 05:05 PM
4

Article says it was a mutual decision.
/r/MensRights01/03/24 08:34 PM
1

They cheated. I left.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/03/24 04:34 PM
30

Just goes to show that you shouldn't have a baby with a woman you met 3 months prior.
/r/MensRights01/03/24 04:23 PM
7

Create a fake, female profile and find those posts and comments. Screenshot them. Then, contact an attorney. Tell him your story; including the tall building portion. Learn your options under any antidefamation laws you may have.
/r/MensRights01/03/24 04:10 PM
2

My intent in this is to impress upon you the need for precision when writing. It is important to not only proofread for grammar and spelling but also from the viewpoint of your harshest critic. In this case, that critic would be a man who has been burned in the past for believing this. To him, the "safe and sound" wording could read like you are only in it for the good times; as soon as things go bad, you're out of there. Something he, or a man he knows, has likely experienced. Adding "try to" a…
/r/MensRights01/03/24 03:35 AM
3

Then why did you say that he must come home safe and sound?
/r/MensRights01/03/24 02:09 AM
0

Well, DAH!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/03/24 12:39 AM
2

What if he comes injured?
/r/MensRights01/03/24 12:33 AM
2

The same media that claimed that Russia interfered with the 2016 US elections.
/r/MensRights29/02/24 09:19 PM
-1

Repeal the 16th.
/r/MensRights29/02/24 04:59 PM
2

I like roast beef. /s
/r/MensRights29/02/24 03:15 AM
1

It is the natural order of things. 2.5 million years of hominid evolution has made women hypergamous and men the providers.
/r/MensRights28/02/24 10:46 PM
0

You haven't shown the connection.
/r/MensRights27/02/24 05:01 PM
3

Please make the connection between this article and men's rights for me because I don't see the connection.
/r/MensRights27/02/24 01:50 PM
5

What country?
/r/MensRights27/02/24 11:28 AM
3

RP him.
/r/MensRights26/02/24 06:19 PM
3

Decide if you want peace or drama. Then you'll know what to do..
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/02/24 06:52 PM
2

I stopped reading when I saw that the study only included the preferences of females; not the population as a whole.
/r/MensRights25/02/24 05:55 PM
113

True princesses were treated as chattel. Their fathers traded them for socio-economic and political reasons. They were then expected to become baby factories, solidifying the familiar/political bonds. If they failed to produce offspring, in particular male offspring, they were often discarded. Sometimes, the method of discard was even death. Explain this reality to women and ask them if they truly want to be treated like princesses. Life has never been a Disney movie.
/r/MensRights25/02/24 05:35 PM
1

Then, let me give you something to consider... Women's suffrage must have seemed an insurmountable thing to achieve back in 1838(?) when a woman first published an article in support of it. But she did it anyway, and things slowly began to change. It took nearly 100 years, but men granted women the right to vote in 1920. I say men granted women the right because women couldn't vote and therefore could not directly participate in the ratification of the 19A. Now consider that, from a political sc…
/r/MensRights25/02/24 04:44 PM
1

Then why did you ask the question?
/r/MensRights25/02/24 03:26 PM
1

Which is exactly why you MUST make the argument.
/r/MensRights25/02/24 03:19 PM
1

Does that invalidate the argument?
/r/MensRights25/02/24 03:15 PM
2

I just gave you an argument that both proves it is not an equal rights issue and that it should be.
/r/MensRights25/02/24 03:07 PM
14

But, it does. Ask them this.... If a woman can terminate her and, by extension, the father's parental responsibilities, why doesn't the father have the same right to terminate his parental responsibilities? Why can't he sign away his financial responsibility to the child? Let's call it a paper abortion. And, speaking of a father's parental responsibilities, did you know that there was a study published in 1999 by the American Association of Blood Banks which showed that of those who requested pa…
/r/MensRights25/02/24 02:59 PM
1

Because there is no restaurant chain called "T&A" to attack.
/r/MensRights23/02/24 04:44 PM
11

That post read like a woman pretending to be an incel wrote it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/02/24 04:27 PM
2

IOW simps.
/r/MensRights23/02/24 05:44 AM
1

You could right the grant application as being to prove that women are missing out. The results will be what they will be.
/r/MensRights20/02/24 05:59 PM
1

It has been long debunked.
/r/MensRights19/02/24 08:18 PM
15

An interesting interpretation of Atlas Shrugged. As a 63yo man who never married, I shrugged about 30 years ago.
/r/MensRights19/02/24 01:16 PM
7

I would have upvoted this except for the irrelevant, emotional outburst of the second paragraph.
/r/MensRights19/02/24 12:07 PM
13

Everyone.
/r/MensRights19/02/24 12:02 PM
4

A man should never show any sign of weakness to a woman; it will only be weaponized against him at some point in the future.
/r/MensRights19/02/24 02:37 AM
5

Good. I need to read no further through the comments.
/r/MensRights19/02/24 02:35 AM
6

Paper Abortion Automatic DNA testing of paternity before a man can sign a birth certificate.
/r/MensRights17/02/24 03:01 AM
4

Why are you friends with this shit of a person?
/r/MensRights14/02/24 02:11 PM
1

My question still hasn't been answered.
/r/MensRights14/02/24 01:35 AM
2

You didn't answer my question.
/r/MensRights13/02/24 11:29 PM
1

Does conscription make men cooperative?
/r/MensRights13/02/24 06:38 PM
1

It isn't different here in the states nor anywhere in the world. What you describe is a natural by-product of the hypergamous nature of women.
/r/MensRights13/02/24 04:08 PM
6

Militaries are not egalitarian; they are very hierarchical.
/r/MensRights13/02/24 04:02 PM
7

Feminism
/r/MensRights13/02/24 03:23 PM
6

Look for a job with a different company.
/r/MensRights12/02/24 03:55 AM
4

Women are, and always have been, hypergamous. The internet has just made it very obvious.
/r/MensRights11/02/24 10:07 PM
0

In 63 years, I've never heard of this notion.
/r/MensRights11/02/24 01:24 PM
2

It is called infantilizing.
/r/MensRights09/02/24 08:49 PM
1

Who?
/r/MensRights06/02/24 12:38 PM
1

I didn't, but yes I can. A vice is a vice.
/r/MensRights05/02/24 02:28 PM
1

Slavery (trafficking) is already a crime under the 13th amendment and international human rights law, so there is no need to criminalize a voluntary transaction between two consenting adults.
/r/MensRights05/02/24 02:05 PM
26

VICES are those acts by which a man harms himself or his property. Crimes are those acts by which one man harms the person or property of another. Vices are simply the errors which a man makes in his search after his own happiness. Unlike crimes, they imply no malice toward others, and no interference with their persons or property. In vices, the very essence of crime—that is, the design to injure the person or property of another—is wanting. It is a maxim of the law that there can be no crime w…
/r/MensRights05/02/24 12:59 PM
5

VICES are those acts by which a man harms himself or his property. Crimes are those acts by which one man harms the person or property of another. Vices are simply the errors which a man makes in his search after his own happiness. Unlike crimes, they imply no malice toward others, and no interference with their persons or property. In vices, the very essence of crime—that is, the design to injure the person or property of another—is wanting. It is a maxim of the law that there can be no crime w…
/r/MensRights05/02/24 12:57 PM
2

Blaming the men for being exactly what the women seek is wrong.
/r/MensRights05/02/24 12:36 PM
13

Begin recording every conversation with her.
/r/MensRights04/02/24 09:23 PM
1

<sarcasm> you young kids. I remember Windows. No 1, 2, 3, or any other suffix. I was 25 </sarcasm>
/r/MensRights04/02/24 12:49 AM
8

They should read "Atlas Shrugged" by Ayn Rand.
/r/MensRights03/02/24 07:18 PM
28

The phrase "communist libertarian" is an oxymoron.
/r/MensRights03/02/24 01:05 PM
1

Simp
/r/MensRights30/01/24 01:21 PM
0

You contradicted yourself.
/r/MensRights29/01/24 05:06 AM
5

AI lies enough that lawyers have been sanctioned for relying on AI which makes up case law that doesn't exist.
/r/MensRights29/01/24 04:01 AM
1

Are you dyslexic?
/r/MensRights28/01/24 09:16 PM
1

Then that is all you should have said. I can only respond to what you actually said; which I read in its totality.
/r/MensRights28/01/24 11:49 AM
1

Which is an individual problem.
/r/MensRights28/01/24 03:40 AM
-1

LOL@U
/r/MensRights28/01/24 01:20 AM
-2

No, I won't. I didn't perceive any aggression. None of those synonyms have exactly the same meaning.
/r/MensRights27/01/24 11:27 PM
-1

Is using a bunch of words that describe something more effective than one word that does the same thing?
/r/MensRights27/01/24 11:07 PM
-3

I see that word is not deleted from your vocabulary.
/r/MensRights27/01/24 11:05 PM
-1

If you delete words from your vocabulary, you limit your your ability to communicate effectively.
/r/MensRights27/01/24 05:28 PM
48

There is no such thing as toxic masculinity. There are only toxic individuals.
/r/MensRights27/01/24 01:26 PM
6

Hypocrisy
/r/MensRights27/01/24 01:13 PM
8

Cannabis did not cause her to act like that.
/r/MensRights24/01/24 07:49 PM
3

Because there is no such thing as a female incel (a.k.a. femcel).
/r/MensRights24/01/24 02:43 PM
5

No.
/r/MensRights20/01/24 07:24 PM
8

No, it wasn't.
/r/MensRights19/01/24 06:26 PM
13

MGTOW has always been around. We were just called "confirmed bachelors."
/r/MensRights19/01/24 06:09 PM
18

Same thing I did 30 years ago.
/r/MensRights19/01/24 02:00 PM
3

I never thought about it in this way before. I was stationed with a young man back around 1983. He never drank, smoked, or anything. He worked out every day. He had been feeling poorly for a couple of days and decided to go on sick call. The next thing we knew, he was being shipped off to Wilford Hall with cancer. He didn't make it.
/r/MensRights09/01/24 11:17 PM
1

They can't run with the big dogs?
/r/MensRights05/01/24 06:42 AM
1

The OP never mentioned that in his reply to my comment. So, I doubt your memory.
/r/MensRights03/01/24 09:55 PM
3

How did you determine that from the OP? The country is not mentioned in the OP.
/r/MensRights03/01/24 07:59 PM
1

That is not your only option, nor your best option, to change the law. Another option, and the best one, is to begin lobbying your legislators to repeal and/or change the law.
/r/MensRights03/01/24 06:46 PM
6

Untrue
/r/MensRights03/01/24 05:31 PM
14

Saying no comment provides no legal protection and, per SCOTUS, could be used against you.
/r/MensRights03/01/24 10:30 AM
185

Never speak to police without a lawyer. The only thing you should say is, "I will not speak to you without a lawyer. I invoke the 5th." Then STFU.
/r/MensRights03/01/24 07:10 AM
1

Name those companies and I will look them up.
/r/MensRights03/01/24 06:57 AM
1

Narcissism has nothing to do with politics.
/r/MensRights03/01/24 03:23 AM
2

Never speak to police w/o a lawyer. Always speak the words, "I invoke the 5th," and then STFU.
/r/MensRights03/01/24 02:27 AM
0

No.
/r/MensRights02/01/24 09:06 PM
3

The sense of relief I had when my father passed was that his suffering from the terminal illness was over.
/r/MensRights02/01/24 07:46 PM
1

No, you're not.
/r/MensRights02/01/24 05:04 PM
1

I just point out how Samantha Brick's business did when she started an all female business. She even wrote an article about it. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1168182/Catfights-handbags-tears-toilets-When-producer-launched-women-TV-company-thought-shed-kissed-goodbye-conflict-.html
/r/MensRights02/01/24 04:46 PM
1

Original killings? Did she kill them a second time?
/r/MensRights01/01/24 08:40 PM
6

You made me look. I can find the book for sale, but no articles about it with a open minded perspective. Interestingly, all the articles I found about it begin with a variation of this sentence: "The author hates women." That sentence demonstrates that everything which follows will not be a critical analysis and the articles are written by the same person (I didn't look) or are repeating (plagurizing?) a single source.
/r/MensRights01/01/24 04:33 PM
6

Can't believe that people are downvoting you for speaking the truth. The Civil Rights Act of 1964 removed any remaining possibility of the government taxing at different rates.
/r/MensRights31/12/23 09:53 PM
2

Join Toastmasters.
/r/MensRights31/12/23 06:57 PM
1

Comedy? Sounds more like fantasy.
/r/MensRights31/12/23 05:33 PM
-8

Obviously satire.
/r/MensRights31/12/23 04:31 PM
9

Is your grandfather passing a normal occurrence?
/r/MensRights31/12/23 03:47 PM
13

So it wasn't a normal action.
/r/MensRights31/12/23 02:50 PM
3

Blocked.
/r/MensRights31/12/23 04:46 AM
-10

I wanted roast beef!
/r/MensRights31/12/23 03:57 AM
9

Like the author.
/r/MensRights31/12/23 03:11 AM
10

Seems like the author is upset that "MHRA" hasn't taken hold in the decade since he introduced it, and "MRA" has.
/r/MensRights31/12/23 03:08 AM
13

Irrelevant
/r/MensRights31/12/23 02:57 AM
0

I know.
/r/MensRights31/12/23 01:40 AM
-1

That makes no comparison or attempt to define what is healthy.
/r/MensRights31/12/23 12:35 AM
0

Where was that claimed in what you responded to?
/r/MensRights31/12/23 12:09 AM
0

I don't download files from strangers.
/r/MensRights30/12/23 10:41 PM
1

My source was newer.
/r/MensRights30/12/23 10:36 PM
1

You didn't look very hard. The last I knew, Nigera wasn't even in the same hemisphere as the US. 30% in the US-> https://dnatesting.com/paternity-fraud-the-tough-realities-men-must-face/#:~:text=First%3A%20Some%20Paternity%20Test%20Stats,tests%20nationwide%20turn%20out%20negative.
/r/MensRights30/12/23 10:21 PM
49

No wonder her back hurt.
/r/MensRights30/12/23 08:52 PM
1

I know.
/r/MensRights30/12/23 08:47 PM
7

Male privilege: 99% of all war deaths are men. Men are subject to conscription. 95% of all dangerous jobs are filled by men. Men comprise 93% of workplace deaths. To name just a few.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/12/23 08:07 PM
2

That is only of men who had reason to check. It is estimated that the actual number is a minimum of 50%; maybe as high as 60%. Think about how many families you know that have one child that doesn't seem like the rest...
/r/MensRights30/12/23 08:02 PM
1

What about the body text? I couldn't edit it either.
/r/MensRights30/12/23 07:49 PM
1

So now you have a different position than you originally stated.
/r/MensRights30/12/23 07:48 PM
1

You had the opportunity to explain to me the possibilities of why I couldn't edit the post but chose to state only the obvious.
/r/MensRights30/12/23 05:50 PM
1

I tried to edit it as soon as I saw that there was no preview generated for the video (which woul have included its title), but I had no option to edit. Still don't.
/r/MensRights30/12/23 05:22 PM
1

Nothing.
/r/MensRights30/12/23 01:13 AM
1

Withholding exculpatory evidence is not incompetence: it is malicious. But, even if you are correct, who identified her attacker?
/r/MensRights29/12/23 11:43 PM
1

If, as the article alludes, the police withheld exculpatory evidence, that is not incompetence: it is intentional.
/r/MensRights29/12/23 11:40 PM
16

Not anymore.
/r/MensRights29/12/23 10:06 PM
4

If women were voting for women, shouldn't the representation be equal to the population? Could it be that women don't see other women as qualified for the positions?
/r/MensRights29/12/23 07:17 PM
1

It wouldn't be brutal even if it were true.
/r/MensRights28/12/23 04:59 PM
7

Yes. It is up to the person disputing the studies to provide studies showing refuting their validity.
/r/MensRights28/12/23 03:11 PM
1

Not in the US.
/r/MensRights28/12/23 03:01 PM
7

In the US, she would have been charged with conspiracy to commit murder. In the US, a conviction on conspiracy is punishable the same as if one actually committed the crime.
/r/MensRights28/12/23 02:37 PM
2

No, they don't.
/r/MensRights28/12/23 02:25 PM
3

Your handle says it all.
/r/MensRights28/12/23 05:26 AM
3

Where did I claim otherwise?
/r/MensRights28/12/23 02:32 AM
3

So it was just in your mind. I'm not responsible for what you think I said.
/r/MensRights27/12/23 11:48 PM
3

How did you come to that assumption?
/r/MensRights27/12/23 11:44 PM
5

Which is what originally said.
/r/MensRights27/12/23 11:41 PM
4

You received no love from anime characters.
/r/MensRights27/12/23 11:37 PM
3

As your father, he earned your love.
/r/MensRights27/12/23 11:35 PM
34

A man never receives unconditional love.
/r/MensRights27/12/23 03:02 PM
2

I made a ribeye steak, baked potatoes, baked corn, and sweet potatoes, so yes, he did. Now, if he'd only deal with the dishes. LOL
/r/MensRights26/12/23 12:40 AM
1

I have no idea what Sho-gi is, but I'd give it the old college try. I've only shot a flintlock once. I'd like to try it again... this time without a double load (the guy was trying to "up" me, but I'd seen his previous loads and this one, so I was prepared).
/r/MensRights26/12/23 12:37 AM
12

It has happened before.
/r/MensRights25/12/23 04:53 AM
21

That is not just.
/r/MensRights25/12/23 12:19 AM
197

He'll end up having to pay child support.
/r/MensRights24/12/23 10:06 PM
2

You need to be more specific. Are you asking why the courts are doing what they are doing or why men would willingly take custody of their children?
/r/MensRights23/12/23 04:38 PM
2

Excellent video.
/r/MensRights23/12/23 04:36 PM
1

Then all the taxpayers are paying.
/r/MensRights23/12/23 04:15 PM
2

As a 10yo boy in 1971 when his parents divorced, I'd be interested. I'm tempted to share my experiences here, but thinking of them as a totality, even just a few weeks shy of my 63rd birthday, even with all the adults now being deceased, it still chaffs my ass. I've discussed individual things from then without any problems, but thinking of them as a whole and how they have affected my life... I guess I'm still not able to discuss it as a whole.
/r/MensRights23/12/23 04:13 PM
2

Because it is based on the man's income and not the needs of the child. Also, most men would willingly take custody, but the courts mostly default to giving the kids to the woman.
/r/MensRights23/12/23 03:44 PM
0

Yep.
/r/MensRights23/12/23 03:27 PM
-1

You are obviously much younger than me.
/r/MensRights23/12/23 03:22 PM
1

It began far longer ago than 10 years.
/r/MensRights23/12/23 03:14 PM
1

"This video is unavailable"
/r/MensRights23/12/23 02:37 PM
5

You could say the same about JFK.
/r/MensRights23/12/23 02:35 PM
1

Never. Gonna. Happen.
/r/MensRights23/12/23 08:10 AM
42

Masculinity is neither positive nor negative; it just is. Individuals can be positive or negative.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/12/23 03:28 AM
7

Facepalm
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen22/12/23 09:34 PM
5

Hen parties are much worse than bachelor parties.
/r/MensRights20/12/23 11:05 PM
1

Understanding what you can control, what can not control, and acting accordingly is part of being a man. In regards to women, being indifferent is the key. Enjoy their company when they are there and enjoy your own company when they aren't. Never fall in love with something that can rip your heart out and smile while doing it.
/r/MensRights20/12/23 09:07 PM
2

Why worry about things that you have no control over? Just move on.
/r/MensRights20/12/23 08:44 PM
1

There is no toxic masculinity. There are only toxic people. If a trait was toxic, evolution would have eliminated it eons ago. It isn't the trait that is toxic. It is how one chooses to utilize a trait that is toxic. I.E. aggression can be used to advance in one's career and make more money, or it can be used to rob another and steal their money.
/r/MensRights19/12/23 02:39 PM
5

What you are describing is already happening. Modern women are hitting the wall, and men are going their own way.
/r/MensRights18/12/23 06:22 PM
1

There are always outliers.
/r/MensRights16/12/23 06:17 PM
16

Stop showing weakness to women. It will only be weaponized against you at some point in the future.
/r/MensRights15/12/23 02:13 PM
12

When I was young, we didn't describe those as sassy. We called them bitchy.
/r/MensRights15/12/23 06:57 AM
4

You have chosen the blue pill, which ignores the evolutionary psychology of humans. While you might be happy in the feminine role, her hypergamous nature will ultimately make her unhappy in the masculine role.
/r/MensRights15/12/23 01:25 AM
2

Either and both can now be legislated.
/r/MensRights15/12/23 12:57 AM
-2

Everybody should be concerned. Roe v Wade was not argued on the grounds that abortion should be legal. It was argued on the grounds of privacy. The question was whether or not the state had the ability to intervene in the privacy of the doctor/patient relationship. One of the grounds which I heard that they used as a justification for overturning Roe v Wade was that it was a "knee jerk" decision to current events of the time. If that was one of their reasons, it ignored the fact that, at the tim…
/r/MensRights15/12/23 12:51 AM
3

Yes, as soon as I'm done riding this unicorn.
/r/MensRights13/12/23 07:20 AM
16

Check out the Libertarian Party.
/r/MensRights13/12/23 12:40 AM
8

Libertarian
/r/MensRights13/12/23 12:39 AM
8

I did it about 30 years ago. At 62, I still get asked why no woman has scooped me up yet. While my decisions are none of anybody else's business, I found a polite way to end the conversation. I simply say, "I'm overqualified."
/r/MensRights12/12/23 10:30 PM
3

I had forgotten about that. Admittedly, I was only 12yo at the time.
/r/MensRights12/12/23 05:03 PM
11

Don't forget, BO got a Nobel Peace Prize shortly after he was elected for his campaign rhetoric. 😉
/r/MensRights12/12/23 02:55 PM
1

For others reading this (since you already know) PyscHacks on YT just did a video on this exact thing. https://youtu.be/fUuVtOgNrdM?si=2Sc1Pg-1qEA0RtVx
/r/MensRights12/12/23 12:44 PM
3

Yes.
/r/MensRights12/12/23 04:33 AM
-1

The kidnapping of civilians by an occupying force is a war crime. The parading and photographing of prisoners is a war crime.
/r/MensRights12/12/23 03:34 AM
18

That is why we need to be able to execute a paper abortion.
/r/MensRights11/12/23 10:49 PM
3

Because women falsely think that it is as easy for a man to get sex as it is for a woman.
/r/MensRights10/12/23 10:44 PM
7

Because feminism has become about female privilege rather than equality.
/r/MensRights10/12/23 08:54 PM
1

Not really. It wasn't a conscious, bright line, type decision. It was more something that just happened. Being born in 1961, I grew up hearing about equal rights and the attempt to ratify the ERA. And the sexual revolution. As a teenager and young man, I thoroughly enjoyed the sexual revolution. By the time I was in my late 20s, I realized that if I wanted to settle down and start a family that I'd most likely have to accept a ready-made family. I thought I'd accepted this reality. I even dated …
/r/MensRights10/12/23 08:14 PM
5

Me. I made that decision 30 years ago.
/r/MensRights10/12/23 04:30 PM
1

Because it is impossible.
/r/MensRights07/12/23 10:51 PM
28

They can't even work together, let alone run a city. Samantha Brick's attempt proves it. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1168182/Catfights-handbags-tears-toilets-When-producer-launched-women-TV-company-thought-shed-kissed-goodbye-conflict-.html
/r/MensRights07/12/23 09:36 PM
0

Because it is a reaction video.
/r/MensRights05/12/23 02:30 AM
2

I can see it.
/r/MensRights05/12/23 01:09 AM
4

You just learned that men and women can not be friends; there will always be an emotional imbalance.
/r/MensRights03/12/23 04:03 PM
1

You edited your comment so that I can't.
/r/MensRights02/12/23 05:50 AM
1

You selected the time frame.
/r/MensRights02/12/23 03:32 AM
1

Hopefully, it is airtight.
/r/MensRights01/12/23 04:30 AM
1

Good.
/r/MensRights01/12/23 04:08 AM
2

I just said that.
/r/MensRights01/12/23 02:09 AM
9

Don't forget that child support isn't about the needs of the child; it is about how much the man can pay.
/r/MensRights01/12/23 02:05 AM
23

The world is not a safe place. It never has been.
/r/MensRights30/11/23 03:32 AM
23

And, if you really dig into it, the only reason they began abducting females was because their previous attempts to gain attention, by abducting males only, did not get the desired results.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/11/23 10:13 PM
2

You covered a lot of distance for such a short post.
/r/MensRights29/11/23 10:09 PM
1

Now, you are trying to change the context of the OP and your direct response to it.
/r/MensRights29/11/23 09:00 PM
1

So ,the UK doesn't imprison any males unless they are serial killers and/or cannibals?
/r/MensRights29/11/23 07:26 PM
-12

Irrelevant to the question asked.
/r/MensRights29/11/23 07:24 PM
2

No. 2 years is far too long to be holding on to this, but another relationship is not the answer. ONSs can help. They can rebuild your confidence. How to get over this? First, go full NC with her. Second, go full NC with those who are faulting you for the breakup. Block them everywhere. You don't need that negativity in your life. Those males that are left are your true friends; hang out with them. Third, focus on your purpose. You focus on your purpose by staying active and fit. Develop your ca…
/r/MensRights29/11/23 06:54 PM
71

Sometimes, it helps to find the source of the information (National Institute of Justice & Centers for Disease Control & Prevention, Prevalence, Incidence and Consequences of Violence Against Women Survey (1998)) first. I had never heard this before reading your post, so I had to look it up. Of course, because of the source, I could find nothing even attempting to refute it. So, I decided to download the pdf (https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/21950) and read the study; paying particular attention …
/r/MensRights29/11/23 04:24 PM
1

Even males?
/r/MensRights29/11/23 03:38 PM
1

The first movie I remember this being brought up in was "Animal House."
/r/MensRights29/11/23 03:31 PM
3

How does this relate to mens' rights?
/r/MensRights29/11/23 02:43 PM
1

Dont forget the sex...especially the traveling nurses.
/r/MensRights29/11/23 02:33 PM
23

She wants a man who has options and can't understand why they will not choose her over those options. So much for that Masters degree.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen29/11/23 02:05 PM
5

Men should never show any sign of weakness to a woman; it will be weaponized against him at some point in the future.
/r/MensRights29/11/23 01:34 PM
0

I think you misread, but for more clarity... I suffered a TBI back in 84. I began to suffer from migraines afterward. I had been on a prophylactic for about 20 years, successfully. I began to have edema episodes. They were, incorrectly, blamed on the long term use of the prophylactic, and the prescription was pulled. My migraines began to increase in frequency. About 2 years later, while being examined for sleep apnea, it was discovered that I had a chronic sinus infection and was prescribed a C…
/r/MensRights29/11/23 04:38 AM
28

I guess I was, to a point. I was on board with the equal rights thing. I still think that everybody should have equal rights and responsibilities. I was definitely on board with the sexual revolution as it happened in the 70s and early 80s. I reasoned that since the sexual revolution had occurred, I was most likely not going to be able to find a mate without kids. While I had consciously accepted this and even dated women with kids, they just led nowhere. So, over time, I just quit dating. I onl…
/r/MensRights29/11/23 04:17 AM
1

My experience with psychologists is limited to VA. When I first noticed that I was having issues getting out doing things, I sought help. I was told to just go out and do things; I'd feel better after. Cognitive Behavior Therapy (CBT)... a fancy description for telling men to just suck it up. This led to a decade of hell. All because the VA screwed up my meds for another issue. After I, not the VA, figured out the med issue, the depression remained. Interestingly, the depression seems to have li…
/r/MensRights29/11/23 03:54 AM
3

If this was the case, wouldn't others have stumbled upon this fact before? Or, did they find exactly what they were looking for (confirmation bias)?
/r/MensRights29/11/23 02:15 AM
1

Yes.
/r/MensRights28/11/23 09:58 PM
3

Nobody has asked me to defend my position. You asked me a question. I answered. You made an assertion in rebuttal and asked me to prove your assertion.
/r/MensRights28/11/23 07:43 PM
6

The burden of proving an assertion is upon the person making the assertion.
/r/MensRights28/11/23 05:20 PM
7

Not that I'm aware of. Even if there were a few outliers, there were far from anything near enough of them to influence evolution
/r/MensRights28/11/23 05:17 PM
3

After the first time I got slapped, I decided that if a woman can be unladylike enough to slap me, I can be ungentlemanly enough to hit her back. I've informed every woman with whom I've been involved since of this position and I've never been slapped again. Over 40 years and I've never been slapped again.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/11/23 03:57 PM
2

2.5 million years of hominid evolution has made men providers and protectors.
/r/MensRights28/11/23 03:52 PM
6

Thanks, you voiced my thoughts better than I could have.
/r/MensRights27/11/23 05:54 PM
1

Link?
/r/MensRights27/11/23 02:08 PM
6

I'm too for it to affect me directly, but do you happen to know the status of Iowa?
/r/MensRights27/11/23 03:14 AM
5

Good luck!
/r/MensRights27/11/23 03:12 AM
4

You should read this before committing your child to a single mother household. https://medium.com/the-knowledge-of-freedom/single-father-households-do-vastly-better-than-single-mother-heres-the-real-reason-why-8a7fd7c5611d#:~:text=For%20example%2C%20studies%20have%20found,14%20times%20more%20likely%20to
/r/MensRights27/11/23 03:05 AM
1

What country are you in?
/r/MensRights27/11/23 03:02 AM
1

Consider the Libertarian Party of Canada. Not this libertarian and conservative that you keep mentioning.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/11/23 02:16 AM
1

Figure out a way to get a prenatal DNA test if possible with the distance involved. If not, demand one after the child is born; stabbing salvia isn't an issue at disrance.
/r/MensRights27/11/23 02:11 AM
3

Men have always been disposable.
/r/MensRights27/11/23 01:59 AM
1

You have no centrist parties?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/11/23 01:57 AM
2

Have you considered voting for 3rd parties?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/11/23 01:50 AM
5

2.5 million years of hominid evolution has made men both work together and compete with other men. It is the circumstances that dictate which will occur.
/r/MensRights27/11/23 01:42 AM
1

In 1993, the budget was $316.72B. In 2000, it was 320.09B.
/r/MensRights27/11/23 12:24 AM
1

Was the military budget reduced? Was the Dept. of Education removed? The answer to both is no. All blow and no go.
/r/MensRights26/11/23 11:20 PM
3

WOT
/r/MensRights26/11/23 11:08 PM
16

Men are being excluded in tech. Some have figured out a way around this. https://nypost.com/2023/10/04/men-invaded-womens-job-fair-after-lying-about-being-non-binary/
/r/MensRights26/11/23 09:45 PM
1

Yes.
/r/MensRights26/11/23 02:31 AM
2

But, arguably, Barry Goldwater was the last of those Republicans. Nixon sure wasn't. JFK could be argued as the last of the classical liberals in the democratic party. LBJ sure wasn't. One must look at the modern era to determine what those parties currently represent. The democrats want more government control. The republicans want better (not smaller) government. The former think the solution is always another government program. The latter never attempt to dismantle the government; they purpo…
/r/MensRights25/11/23 10:59 PM
1

Thanks for supplying the research links.
/r/MensRights25/11/23 10:38 PM
35

A man should never show any sign of weakness to a woman. It will be weaponized against him at some point in the future.
/r/MensRights25/11/23 10:34 PM
1

We just need to stop encouraging girls to be masculine and boys to be feminine. Strong male role models are the answer.
/r/MensRights25/11/23 07:31 PM
1

Yes
/r/MensRights25/11/23 02:31 PM
1

I suggest DMing me now, so that you can find me more easily later, if needed.
/r/MensRights25/11/23 12:08 AM
1

I hope I've been able to help you. When I went through this, I had to figure it out on my own; there was no Internet. I'll even offer you this. Feel free to DM me and I will do my best to help you. I know it's not easy. I made mistakes. I don't want you to make those mistakes.
/r/MensRights24/11/23 11:50 PM
1

Get out.
/r/MensRights24/11/23 11:43 PM
2

Take this piece of Buddhist wisdom to heart: Expectation is the root of all pain.
/r/MensRights24/11/23 11:41 PM
1

Then don't go. Hang up at the first mention of it next time. They are disrespecting you. Why should you feel any obligation to them?
/r/MensRights24/11/23 11:36 PM
1

Xmas is coming up. On the assumption that you have a family gathering for Xmas; don't go. Respectfully send your regrets, but don't go. Then, wait for them to contact you. Stand your ground. At best, tell them that you will attend, but if anybody so much as mentions this issue, in any way, that you will get up and leave. Mean it. Do it when it happens.
/r/MensRights24/11/23 11:29 PM
1

Such as?
/r/MensRights24/11/23 11:22 PM
1

If they don't respect you enough to honor your wishes, then you be the person to step back...and away from them.
/r/MensRights24/11/23 11:21 PM
1

Shoot back.
/r/MensRights24/11/23 11:16 PM
1

FYI, I'm 62 and had to do this about 30 years ago. My family chose my being happy.
/r/MensRights24/11/23 11:14 PM
1

BINGO! He got it for his campaign rhetoric and being elected. Nothing more.
/r/MensRights24/11/23 11:09 PM
1

My advice remains the same.
/r/MensRights24/11/23 11:05 PM
1

Then man up and just say that. Now, to your questions. Tell them that you are happy with your life as it is. If they can't accept you as you are (being happy), tell them they have a choice: they can choose to not bring this up again or to leave your life.
/r/MensRights24/11/23 11:02 PM
1

That didn't answer my question. Do you mean that you are just having casual relationships/sex?
/r/MensRights24/11/23 10:54 PM
1

I'm 62. What is seeding?
/r/MensRights24/11/23 10:53 PM
-6

If you are indifferent to them, it doesn't matter.
/r/MensRights24/11/23 10:39 PM
9

Take some initiative. Set up an afternoon to watch the ball game. An evening to watch MMA. Invite them over.
/r/MensRights24/11/23 10:29 PM
16

Decompress with your male friends like men have always done.
/r/MensRights24/11/23 10:17 PM
-6

Become indifferent to them.
/r/MensRights24/11/23 10:07 PM
4

Look at the effort he HAD to do to make it clear that he doesn't condone rape. I got so tired of reading that at the beginning that I didn't even want to finish the article.
/r/MensRights24/11/23 08:11 PM
9

Women never want to accept responsibility for their actions. Feminism has not changed this.
/r/MensRights24/11/23 07:24 PM
19

Because in states without "at-fault" laws, they really have little to no choice.
/r/MensRights24/11/23 04:57 PM
5

The vast majority of men are not attracted to masculine characteristics.
/r/MensRights24/11/23 01:04 AM
3

Did she pay?
/r/MensRights23/11/23 03:09 PM
6

99.9% of all war deaths
/r/MensRights23/11/23 12:30 PM
1

I did.
/r/MensRights23/11/23 02:33 AM
-8

I was in agreement until the end when you espoused egalitarianism. Women are egalitarian. Men are hierarchical.
/r/MensRights22/11/23 01:44 PM
1

You use the word "you."
/r/MensRights22/11/23 06:51 AM
1

So I'm supposed to interpret what you said and ignore the actual words?
/r/MensRights22/11/23 01:23 AM
8

The premise is a flawed one. The Internet is used because it is a very efficient way of communicating. It is far more efficient than street activism.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/11/23 01:18 AM
1

Where did you make the shift clear?
/r/MensRights22/11/23 01:14 AM
1

You were addressing me.
/r/MensRights22/11/23 12:54 AM
0

Are you married?
/r/MensRights22/11/23 12:53 AM
27

It is an example of an ad hominem attack. They are attacking the messenger and not the message.
/r/MensRights22/11/23 12:09 AM
0

I am not responsible for what you think I said.
/r/MensRights22/11/23 12:02 AM
1

ROFLMAO
/r/MensRights21/11/23 06:54 PM
1

I see.
/r/MensRights21/11/23 06:50 PM
0

Nothing you spoke about supports your assertion, nor does it answer my question. The only thing that you said, which even touches on this sub, was your first sentence; but that was about the members.
/r/MensRights21/11/23 06:49 PM
2

You didn't answer my question.
/r/MensRights21/11/23 06:46 PM
2

Link some examples, please.
/r/MensRights21/11/23 06:42 PM
2

How is this sub "absolutely" right wing?
/r/MensRights21/11/23 06:33 PM
2

This sub? How?
/r/MensRights21/11/23 06:30 PM
4

How is this sub "clearly left" wing?
/r/MensRights21/11/23 06:27 PM
1

How does that apply to my statement?
/r/MensRights21/11/23 06:24 PM
9

Hypocrisy
/r/MensRights20/11/23 12:13 AM
1

No, but I'm 62.
/r/MensRights20/11/23 12:10 AM
4

If gender equality is forced, then you necessarily hire lower quality employees. Took me a bit to find, but here is a good explanation: https://youtube.com/shorts/rMUVTzOnxzY?si=rbeYqYZhDC1_tDZJ
/r/MensRights19/11/23 06:54 PM
1

Because feminism is no longer about equality; it is about privilege.
/r/MensRights18/11/23 07:13 PM
2

But the draft didn't go away. Its use was paused. Men, and only men, are still required to register for the draft or face up to a $250,000 fine and/or 5 years in federal prison.
/r/MensRights18/11/23 04:27 PM
1

Any female who can devise a complex device in order for her to have sex with a horse is deserving of the title "Great." LMAO
/r/MensRights18/11/23 04:20 PM
1

Google it.
/r/MensRights18/11/23 02:20 AM
2

I'm curious about the methodology(?). Basically, I'm curious if the couples studied advanced their statuses equally? Was the man always of, and remained, a higher status than the woman? Or, did the woman's status increase more relative to the man's; did they exceed the status of the man?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/11/23 04:09 PM
1

Are you in a right to work state?
/r/MensRights17/11/23 03:14 PM
1

What does the written dress code say about hair styles?
/r/MensRights16/11/23 01:18 PM
6

I don't.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/11/23 06:04 AM
2

You're in your 30s. Presumably, you've been focusing on your grind and now have a stable career. You've received a couple of promotions and can now provide the stability and strength that a woman wants. Look to women in their early 20s. They have less baggage and are less set in their ways.
/r/MensRights15/11/23 11:47 PM
8

You are conflating conscription with volunteering.
/r/MensRights15/11/23 10:25 PM
6

Male privilege: 99.9% of war deaths are men. 98% of prison inmates are men 94% of workplace deaths are men 80% of murder victims are men 78% of suicides are men 70% of the homeless are men Men get 63% harsher sentences than women for the same crime. I could keep going...
/r/MensRights14/11/23 02:10 PM
2

Focus on your purpose. Keep yourself active and fit. Develop your career. Go to the gym. Develop your hobbies and interests. Become the best you that you can be.
/r/MensRights13/11/23 05:31 PM
1

WT actual F!?!?
/r/MensRights12/11/23 10:11 PM
2

Second link (re)watched (as evidenced by it already being thumbed up by me). I kinda remember it. Thanks for linking the two together for me and others. Both have been saved to a playlist for me to review later, as needed/desired.
/r/MensRights12/11/23 04:41 AM
2

Just finished the first one. WOW!
/r/MensRights12/11/23 04:11 AM
2

Whoever becomes the Libertarian Party candidate.
/r/MensRights11/11/23 07:33 AM
1

Have you ever heard of Catherine the Great and her horse?
/r/MensRights10/11/23 10:38 PM
4

No.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/11/23 06:26 PM
3

Asking why no woman has snatched me up yet. My standard reply is now, "I'm overqualified."
/r/MensRights09/11/23 05:34 PM
5

Who fights the wars in those areas?
/r/MensRights08/11/23 11:20 PM
1

It appears that many here don't play golf and therefore don't understand how you used the word "handicap."
/r/MensRights07/11/23 10:04 PM
3

So what do you think about this?
/r/MensRights07/11/23 04:15 PM
3

I don't think those are equivalent at all.
/r/MensRights06/11/23 04:18 PM
4

I'd turn it back on her. "If I pay, will we be having sex?"
/r/MensRights06/11/23 07:05 AM
1

Actually, now, if you are unwed and live in Tennessee, you have some. Search the group for Tennessee and you will find at least 3 posts on this.
/r/MensRights06/11/23 12:17 AM
10

When I joined the military in 1980, I had every intention of making a career out of it. After a time, I began wondering what some of my deployments were for; they didn't seem to be in support of stemming the flow of communism. There was one in particular that I questioned. I later learned that it was in support of what came to be known as the Iran/Contra Affair. After 6 years, I separated. Our interventionist policies have only gotten worse since then. Because of this, I can't, in all good consc…
/r/MensRights05/11/23 08:49 PM
2

Take a public speaking class. Join a community theater. Join Toastmasters.
/r/MensRights05/11/23 07:24 PM
-1

What was the first word of that sentence?
/r/MensRights05/11/23 05:35 PM
1

That is not evidence.
/r/MensRights05/11/23 03:12 PM
-1

I am not responsible for what you think I said.
/r/MensRights05/11/23 03:10 PM
0

Possibly, not necessarily.
/r/MensRights05/11/23 03:05 PM
0

Where did I claim that?
/r/MensRights05/11/23 03:04 PM
-11

You didn't answer my question.
/r/MensRights04/11/23 08:09 PM
-6

Did I claim otherwise?
/r/MensRights04/11/23 06:50 PM
1

Where is your evidence to support your statement?
/r/MensRights04/11/23 06:37 PM
28

Tennessee was going to be my next post. Learning of it is what prompted my research. Since this dates back to 1999, I decided to do it first. Has there already been a post on the Tennessee law? EDIT: never mind. I just did a search of this sub and found at least 3. One 4 months ago, 2 from 2 months ago.
/r/MensRights04/11/23 06:35 PM
20

I had notice of 10 up votes. When I checked, it was back down to 2. As I type, it is back up to 7.
/r/MensRights04/11/23 06:29 PM
-15

Technically true = true.
/r/MensRights04/11/23 06:26 PM
59

There must be a lot of feminists in here down voting this. I just got a notice that I'd reached 5 up votes. When I clicked the notice, it was down to 2 up votes.
/r/MensRights04/11/23 05:50 PM
-29

Possibly, not necessarily.
/r/MensRights04/11/23 05:44 PM
15

I'm not seeing an edit function on my post, so... Another thing I just remembered from that article is the test on facial recognition of babies. I never had any children (that I know of) and never understood why women always found newborns so adorable. To me, they were always ugly. That test would seem to explain why.
/r/MensRights04/11/23 05:38 PM
13

I said that in my post.
/r/MensRights04/11/23 05:29 PM
5

You can be a good guy without putting the woman on a pedestal. A man should never put a woman on a pedestal. He should always be prepared to walk away.
/r/MensRights04/11/23 09:45 AM
4

That musician is a simp.
/r/MensRights04/11/23 01:08 AM
2

There is always the al la carte menu.
/r/MensRights03/11/23 05:00 PM
11

I recently saw where some men are fighting back against this. Here's an article about it where men pretended to be nonbunary in order to attend a women's only job fair. https://nypost.com/2023/10/05/men-claim-to-be-nonbinary-to-crash-womens-job-fair/
/r/MensRights03/11/23 04:57 PM
20

Ask them what rights they are being denied.
/r/MensRights03/11/23 02:34 PM
9

I am not responsible for what you think I said.
/r/MensRights03/11/23 02:27 PM
1

An interesting thought. I just searched for the first feminist magazine and received results for women's magazines dating back to the era you mentioned. Because not all women's magazines were feminist magazines, I'd have to do more research as the content within those first magazines to determine if they were feminist.
/r/MensRights03/11/23 12:20 PM
9

Did I?
/r/MensRights03/11/23 12:13 PM
21

This could be viewed as a result of women being given the right to vote. Once they had the right, they quickly became the biggest swing voting block. Politicians, eager to remain in power, began passing legislation that favored that block in order to gain votes in their election campaigns.
/r/MensRights03/11/23 12:05 PM
19

Ask how the father is supposed to even be aware of this obligation when the mother hides the existence of the child?
/r/MensRights03/11/23 02:08 AM
8

Yes, he did.
/r/MensRights03/11/23 01:45 AM
2

Having had to clear sewer lines, I'm not a big fan of flushing condoms. Thus, my suggestion.
/r/MensRights02/11/23 09:46 PM
1

Did I claim otherwise? Did you mention that you were referring to any one country in particular?
/r/MensRights02/11/23 08:43 PM
1

I don't. I was hopeful that her experience as a lecturer would translate into her being an effective public speaker. It didn't.
/r/MensRights02/11/23 07:21 PM
1

They'll have to amend the Constitution in order to do that. Good luck with that.
/r/MensRights02/11/23 06:59 PM
3

The only reproductive rights a man has is prevention. Always bring your own condom. Use and dispose of it yourself. DO NOT just toss it in the trash. Always rinse it out before tossing it in the trash.
/r/MensRights02/11/23 04:12 PM
3

MGTOW is not new. They used to be called "confirmed bachelors." I joined those ranks 30 years ago. I'm now 62.
/r/MensRights02/11/23 10:21 AM
15

No. She will have fewer men to compare you to. And she will compare you.
/r/MensRights02/11/23 09:27 AM
-6

Find your inner alpha.
/r/MensRights01/11/23 03:05 PM
6

Another option is not to involve the government and not get married. If one feels they must cohabitate, then a cohabitation agreement is a must. A third option is to not cohabitate.
/r/MensRights01/11/23 12:56 PM
3

If you wish to make your vote count, stop voting for the duopoly. Vote 3rd party. Vote Libertarian.
/r/MensRights01/11/23 12:17 PM
5

I would argue that Feminism 1.0 began in 1848 with the beginning of the women's suffrage movement. So, just a few more generations than you have included.
/r/MensRights01/11/23 03:43 AM
3

Any sign of weakness that a man shows a woman will be weaponized against him at some point in the future. This is much more concise.
/r/MensRights01/11/23 03:31 AM
3

Since you are, the answer obviously is yes.
/r/MensRights31/10/23 01:20 PM
1

Read the whole thing.
/r/MensRights30/10/23 09:49 PM
7

I just don't engage with it. Well, sometimes I do. Sometimes, I just remark that it is an ad hominem attack.
/r/MensRights30/10/23 02:44 PM
0

Did I claim otherwise?
/r/MensRights29/10/23 06:57 PM
0

Didn't I just say that it wouldn't cover it?
/r/MensRights29/10/23 06:56 PM
2

You made me look up exactly how many have them. It seems that max was 16, with half of them having passed new legislation denying recognition of any new common law marriages after a certain point in time. However, those that met the statutory requirements before that time are still recognized. Interestingly, California has never had one. When I was young, I remember Lee Marvin losing the palimony case against him in California's family courts. Fortunately, this was overturned on appeal. Unfortun…
/r/MensRights29/10/23 06:54 PM
5

There is nothing that can protect from a false accusation. A cohabitation agreement can protect against those things that can be foreseen.
/r/MensRights29/10/23 06:07 PM
1

Yes, with the possible exception of in the bathroom.
/r/MensRights29/10/23 05:54 PM
7

Exactly why a man should never cohabitate without a cohabitation agreement. A cohabitation agreement is the only protection a man has against common law marriage laws that were written solely for the benefit of women.
/r/MensRights29/10/23 05:50 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter