TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Im-Mr-Bulldops Archive

View 0 posts and 55 comments by Im-Mr-Bulldops on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Shaking in my boots, I am.
/r/MensRights22/03/17 11:47 PM
1

Well I'm rubber and you're glue, whatever you say bounces off of me and sticks to you.
/r/MensRights22/03/17 11:18 PM
2

For wanting justice? Right.
/r/MensRights22/03/17 11:08 PM
1

So you want to add a whole extra level to judging: not guilty, guilty, and "slam dunk"? Nice. No, more like a qualifier or separate charge that can be added/applied to certain cases. If they starve to death then you effectively gave them a death sentence for blinding somebody. Is that okay with you? I'd prefer they didn't die so quick, so that they had to experience what they inflicted on their victim(s). But, yeah, I don't have a problem with that.
/r/MensRights22/03/17 11:00 PM
1

What's the difference between irrefutably proving something and finding them guilty in court? Where do you draw the line? Slam dunk cases, eg video proof, confessions, etc. Or we can just get rid of all punishments since there's always a risk of punishing an innocent person. Yes, let them starve to death. Excellent and well thought out plan. Why not? Why should we keep them alive at our expense? They clearly are a danger to society, why should society reward them? Not all lives matter. Somebody …
/r/MensRights22/03/17 10:42 PM
2

I'd reserve it for cases where it's been irrefutably proven that X blinded Y. Same stance I have on the death penalty. And fuck giving them disability. Let 'em adapt or starve. If they adapt, half their pay check should go to the person they blinded. If not, well, they should have thought of that before blinding somebody.
/r/MensRights22/03/17 10:29 PM
2

How do you know? Modern countries in modern times haven't tried it.
/r/MensRights22/03/17 07:56 PM
1

I do. It's retarded.
/r/MensRights22/03/17 07:54 PM
1

And being blinded is a far, far heftier punishment.
/r/MensRights22/03/17 07:06 PM
2

If it's clearly proven that X blinded Y, X should lose the ability to see. Whether it's Y blinding them or a government henchmen it doesn't matter, that's the only justice that fits. I'd settle for a legal protection clause where Y simply doesn't get punished for blinding X.
/r/MensRights22/03/17 07:05 PM
2

It's a dumbass expression.
/r/MensRights22/03/17 07:02 PM
13

I don't know about you, but I've never blinded anybody and certainly have no plans to do so in the future. The whole world would certainly not be blind.
/r/MensRights22/03/17 04:21 AM
17

When it comes to blinding somebody, there's no other punishment that fits the crime.
/r/MensRights22/03/17 01:25 AM
15

She can still see, justice wasn't served.
/r/MensRights21/03/17 10:36 PM
2

This guy is gonna have to live with this the rest of his life, they should suffer the same fate. Lock 'em up and let 'em stew in the shit they brought upon themselves. These people are clearly a danger to the public. People don't do shit like this and then turn around and become good people. They will forever be a danger to society.
/r/MensRights02/03/17 05:42 PM
2

Well, if you're going down anyway, you might as well take the people responsible for the situation with you.
/r/MensRights28/01/17 04:50 AM
0

This type of killing is legal. The same goes for police officers shooting a suspect. So then murder isn't "intentionally causing a person's death" but rather something else, perhaps taking a life unjustly? Yes, this could draw attention to the issue, especially if it was done in a way that caught a lot of public attention early on. Be loud and clear about it right from the start and you get attention - but if you just do it and run or wait until your trial then nobody is going to take a second l…
/r/MensRights28/01/17 01:28 AM
1

Murder is basically just "intentionally causing a person's death". Justification doesn't mean shit. So shooting a home intruder in the face is murder? A soldier shooting an enemy soldier? the headline will read "Man kills ex-wife and boyfriend to avoid paying child support for child that wasn't his" And then the back story comes out, especially if he made a video before/during the killings that explains why he did what he did. Tons of people would watch the video and his side would come out.
/r/MensRights28/01/17 12:53 AM
7

Except the parts where she cheated on and defrauded her husband while ruining his life. They're not just gonna gloss over that aspect of it. Especially not if he plays his cards right. Eg, a video explaining why he did it, sent out through the internet through popular mediums like YouTube and Facebook. Bonus if he actually kills them in the video.
/r/MensRights27/01/17 10:39 PM
11

Murder would be the unjusified killing of somebody, in this case it would be very well justified, so it'd just be killing. Skipping the country doesn't punish the offender and send a message or even attract attention to the issue. You behead your ex and her lover, you're getting on the news and they're gonna do some background coverage on what led up to the killings. She'll be dead and that'll draw attention to the issue, which will hopefully cause a push to fix it. Or at the very least, it'll d…
/r/MensRights27/01/17 10:22 PM
8

Not just child support. It goes deeper than that. But whatever, ciao.
/r/MensRights27/01/17 08:47 PM
6

Mmm...nobody?
/r/MensRights27/01/17 08:20 PM
7

Dead serious. And I definitely won't be having kids, lol. I enjoy money, freedom and quiet. Can't have any of that with kids. Not to mention I don't have to worry about it being somebody else's after I've paid a shit ton of money towards raising it.
/r/MensRights27/01/17 08:12 PM
12

The kid can thank his mother for that.
/r/MensRights27/01/17 08:03 PM
61

Why kill yourself when you can kill both of them?
/r/MensRights27/01/17 06:51 PM
48

Because she's got a vagina.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/11/16 07:39 PM
11

Who told it we had a women's toilet?!
/r/MensRights29/10/16 03:01 AM
1

Has being a cunt worked out well for you in real life?
/r/MensRights29/10/16 02:40 AM
5

Are you Down's? America without a doubt has the draft. I had to register for it in order to get the same basic rights as women, who don't have to register.
/r/MensRights29/10/16 02:35 AM
1

"Why do men who are attracted to men not like women's genitals?" Goddamn. Is she Down's?
/r/MensRights10/06/16 02:33 PM
8

Spreading this shit is why we've got these two candidates to choose from. Y'all keep encouraging others to choose between the lesser of two evils so then people only vote between the two and third party candidates never have a chance even though they are miles ahead of both main parties. Self-fulfilling prophecy in action.
/r/MensRights08/06/16 07:20 PM
63

Spreading this shit is why we've got these two candidates to choose from. Y'all keep encouraging others to choose between the lesser of two evils so then people only vote between the two and third party candidates never have a chance even though they are miles ahead of both main parties. Self-fulfilling prophecy in action.
/r/MensRights08/06/16 07:19 PM
2

Which would force me to live in the US, where I have to register to be sacrificed in a for-profit war.
/r/MensRights28/04/16 05:43 PM
2

No one forces women to have children and no one forces men to live in the US. Cool, so who's going to be paying for me to gain citizenship in another country?
/r/MensRights28/04/16 04:42 PM
3

Their lives are so empty and devoid of friends, family, or any source of enjoyment that they have to resort to power tripping to feel anything. They get off on dragging everybody they can down with them.
/r/MensRights02/03/16 07:28 PM
5

Lol, covering your ears, closing your eyes and shouting "nananananana I can't hear you!" God, this is great.
/r/MensRights22/02/16 10:02 PM
2

You are an idiot. Not sure how you even figured out how to work a computer. Cool, insults. There is no science that backs up cutting off labias. Actually, cutting off labias would reduce smegma, one of the arguments for cutting off part of a boy's dick. Since asking you to do research would be a waste of time and there is no way for me to force you to take your meds, I am going to put you on ignore. Stupid debates are for stupid people. I feel bad for your kids, they're so fucked.
/r/MensRights22/02/16 09:58 PM
1

Cool, I'll be sure to cut off my daughter's labias. Edit: How about according to morality?
/r/MensRights22/02/16 09:52 PM
6

It is not as easy to say baby boys being circumcised is bad. Cutting off part of a kid's genitals isn't bad?
/r/MensRights22/02/16 08:07 PM
3

Interesting how the 80/20 gap that involves Death isn't getting as much attention as the pay gap myth which is a $1 / 0.77c difference
/r/MensRights14/02/16 07:57 AM
9

Or if you're a baby boy. Don't want your genitals mutilated? If you're a female, your vagina will always remain intact but if you're male, you're most likely gonna have a piece of your dick cut off.
/r/MensRights14/02/16 02:59 AM
1

Ah, I see. I have never heard that before.
/r/MensRights11/02/16 08:44 PM
2

The fuck is a "nip"?
/r/MensRights11/02/16 08:35 PM
2

It's definitely not a hard science. I was asking for a hard science test. Like your little tail quote? She doesn't belong in the boy's bathroom. The boys who go to school with him seem to disagree, they never had a problem with it. DARVO. Is that your catchphrase?
/r/MensRights08/02/16 08:02 PM
2

You're so funny. I asked for a scientific test. You failed and you think I'm the one who lost the debate? Is psychology not considered a science now? That's between her an the other girls. Her being in the boy's bathroom is when she's above the rules. Except the boys didn't care he was in there. It's one teacher who's got some kind of vendetta against him. No, she should tell the girls to fuck off and use the girl's bathroom. Maybe he should tell the teacher to fuck off and use the same bathroom…
/r/MensRights08/02/16 03:51 PM
3

Then what is the scientific test for transgenderism? What blood levels do they test for? What chromosomal differences are there? Years and years of therapy before they can even think of transitioning. Again, you're showing your lack of knowledge pretty hard here. It's actually funny. Nope. I have no problem with them as long as they are not thinking that they are above the rules and they can walk into whatever sex bathroom they want. Like the subject in this article who is biologically female bu…
/r/MensRights08/02/16 03:32 PM
2

Okay, I'm convinced. Lol, you're clearly a troll.
/r/MensRights08/02/16 03:20 PM
2

When I forced to accept a non-biological male in the men's bathroom, you are forcing me to transition into the insanity the people can just change sexes on a whim. You're clearly showing your lack of knowledge. It's not something that happens on a whim. Are you afraid of them? Is that why you're so opposed? It is the liberals who are imposing their morals of "anyone can change sexes on a whim" on the rest of us. Like how conservatives passed laws banning same sex marriage, laws telling people wh…
/r/MensRights08/02/16 03:17 PM
1

I'm not liberal. And conservatives are the ones trying to impose their morals on the country via implementing laws that interfere in peoples' lives.
/r/MensRights08/02/16 03:11 PM
2

I'm not liberal, buddy. But go ahead and just automatically point your finger at your opposing party and blame them for all the "evils" of the world. Where is anybody demanding that you transition? Are you forgetting conservatives are the ones trying to impose their morals on everybody else?
/r/MensRights08/02/16 03:10 PM
5

Yeah, because this is exactly the same.
/r/MensRights08/02/16 03:31 AM
5

Facebook didn't tell anybody anything like that, wtf are you talking about? Some people are born differently than others, some are gay or lesbian and some think they're meant to be the opposite gender. If it's not hurting you, why does it matter? Do you just like to get your nose in other peoples' business? Glad I never had to think about being a straight male. You're lucky, not everybody gets to fit in perfectly.
/r/MensRights08/02/16 01:39 AM
6

So you prefer a government that is so involved in everyday life that they dictate which bathroom you're allowed to pee in? Or in this case, a government that prevents you from peeing in either bathroom?
/r/MensRights08/02/16 01:31 AM
2

And you're such a good asshole. God forbid people live differently than you, right? It's not affecting you, but you want to stick your fingers in everybody elses' business.
/r/MensRights08/02/16 01:27 AM
6

In fairness no-one's excited about seeing Channing Tatum The gay community would like a word with you.
/r/MensRights28/01/16 07:41 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter