TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ImAPurplePrincess Archive

View 0 posts and 37 comments by ImAPurplePrincess on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-9

Maybe they should be less compassionate to themselves and more compassionate to real human beings. No can do. They're too worried about the pressing issues of date fraud, duhhh.
/r/MensRights16/09/13 11:14 PM
15

How is this even a mens right issue, lol.
/r/MensRights11/09/13 02:43 PM
5

Just because someone is laughing, doesn't mean that they enjoyed the experience. Nervous laughter is a thing.
/r/TheRedPill27/08/13 07:58 PM
2

Exactly. So what about all the money men make that does not belong to them but to women? But that should never be compared to the treatment slaves went through. Men today are considered as people. They can vote. They can earn a salary. Some men are not confined to "home" . Men today are not actively dehumanized by people of authority. Men are not owned and treated as property. The obligation to pay for dates is different then the obligation to work in fields from sun up to sun down.
/r/MensRights15/08/13 06:56 PM
2

Well, yeah. But that sure didn't stop their masters for aggressively dehumanizing them.
/r/MensRights15/08/13 05:41 PM
2

Umm... Slaves were not considered as people, but as property. So whatever money the slaves made did not belong to them. The money belongs to their masters. So the concept of slave-owner wage gap is...weird. Because it does not make sense. (How can their be a supposed wage gap between two people groups if slaves were not even considered as people?)
/r/MensRights15/08/13 08:39 AM
1

I mostly hope that this song means that Lily Allen finally conquered her paranoia that everybody is stealing from her and is making music again... Right?! I miss Lily. :(
/r/MensRights10/08/13 04:45 AM
1

I do agree with you on the fact that there can be good aspects during pregnancy. I somewhat implied it in my previous comment. I just didn't go in depth. But I can't agree with you on the "eat as much as you want" aspect. The whole "feeding for two" is a bit of a myth. The calorie intake shouldn't differ as much before one is pregnant until the last 3 months. And even then it shouldn't be that much. Probably 200 calories or more, depending on the woman. Link In regards to gasadf's comment though…
/r/MensRights08/08/13 03:31 AM
2

And the women's contribution in the actual impregnation aspect is not comparable to the man having to get an erection, produce sperm, and ejaculate. I think that's what gasadf was getting at. A man giving up his semen isn't the same as a woman going through several, several weeks of change to her body. Also, I feel like the pleasures you are comparing are pretty different. I mean, both parties get pleasure through the baby-making process. (Hopefully.) But being pregnant is not a walk in the park…
/r/MensRights07/08/13 11:23 PM
-14

Because they are not fucking gamers. They are thumb twiddlers looking to co-opt geek chic to appeal to their narcissistic egos and get everyone's approval and acceptance to every club without earning any of it. Just like feminism has taught them ti. Lol Woooooow. Such bitterness. It's astounding, really. And somehow, you manage to point blame towards feminism. The true MRA touch.
/r/MensRights02/08/13 12:34 PM
4

Ah, that makes sense. I didn't really mean to be repetitive in regards to bringing up casual gamers. I guess my thought process was to use it as more of a reference. But thanks for pointing this out.
/r/MensRights02/08/13 12:24 PM
0

I edited my comment. I think it may relate to your statement.
/r/MensRights02/08/13 08:00 AM
-18

Let me link an article that goes more in depth for me: Link Adult women represent a significantly greater portion of the video game-playing population than boys age 17 or younger, and nearly half of all video game players are women, according to new research released today by the Entertainment Software Association (ESA). The report, 2013 Essential Facts About the Computer and Video Game Industry, found that women comprise 31 percent of the video game-playing population, while boys 17 and under r…
/r/MensRights02/08/13 07:43 AM
-32

Let me put things in perspective for ya: Link I'll highlight what stood out to me the most and how it relates to your comment. So, in regards to the FPS games: when we look at actual game sales over the past eight years, even though first person shooters had their best year ever in 2012, the sales only represented 18.9% of console video game sales, and only 13% of computer game sales. And then later in the article, the mentioning of casual games (since you pointed out app and browser games) It’s…
/r/MensRights02/08/13 07:13 AM
-34

The primary demographic of gamers is about half ladies and half gents. The ESA released a report about the findings a year ago. Check out the second bullet.
/r/MensRights02/08/13 06:46 AM
1

I agree that comparing the issues of women to slavery is indeed silly. But alimony still doesn't parallel to slavery that well... Slave owners have complete control over their slaves. Slaves had to deal with heavy labor, they had no right to vote, there lives were worth less in comparison to others and a bunch of other terrible things. People who pay alimony are not confined to their homes like slaves were. I know there are can be errors in the judicial system, but I feel the concept of alimony …
/r/MensRights31/07/13 11:46 PM
1

Well, personally, I never seen people compare feminism to slavery. But I have seen comparisons of feminism to the civil rights movement. Though I somewhat understand the latter comparison, I find it flawed. Just as flawed when MRAs compare alimony to slavery. But hey, that's just my opinion.
/r/MensRights31/07/13 11:03 PM
1

You're the one that claimed feminists were literally slaves, not me. I actually found it kind of odd that you said that, to be quite honest. The OP simply stated that the n-word dehumanizes people. The fact that you jumped straight to accusing feminists for normalizing slavery was really bizarre of you. Like, how did you even get to that conclusion? So odd.
/r/MensRights31/07/13 10:45 PM
1

Wasn't trying to make a point. :p I just thought your claim on feminists comparing things to slavery was humorous because, you know, MRAs do that too.
/r/MensRights31/07/13 10:12 PM
1

Don't MRAs compare alimony to slavery, though?
/r/MensRights31/07/13 09:31 PM
0

lol... I am not saying that someone's experience should silence anothers. I'm saying that there is an appropriate time and place to say such things.
/r/MensRights31/07/13 07:51 PM
-2

I do not believe so. What makes you feel that I'm not considering a person's painful experience via the previous comment I made?
/r/MensRights30/07/13 05:35 PM
-1

That really depends, though. There really IS a place and time to talk about things. It's like if I cry over my kid who died in a house fire. And someone suddenly comes in a exclaims: "Well, children die from drowning, too?? Why aren't you crying over them??" Or when a rape victim (who happens to be a woman, hypothetically speaking) talks about her traumatic experience, and someone comes in recites a few statistics that men get raped too. Yes, men do also get raped but that is HIGHLY inappropriat…
/r/MensRights30/07/13 08:55 AM
2

No I mean r/mensrights. Telling a person to GTFO just for expressing their opinion? For shame. :(
/r/MensRights28/07/13 03:07 AM
-1

Whoaaaa I thought this subreddit was all for free speech, yo. What happened man, what happened.
/r/MensRights28/07/13 02:43 AM
2

How I see it, both the father and mother made a choice, thus resulting in consequences for both individuals. The mother (if she chooses to) will go through the dangers of pregnancy and childbirth. And possibly the ridiculously heavy responsibility of raising a kid. And all the father has do is pay a percentage of his income to financially support the damn child. (Obviously this is just one scenario.) Yes, some guys and gals get abused by the system and are forced to pay way more then they can af…
/r/MensRights09/07/13 08:45 AM
3

But finding a partner who supports that ambition can be difficult (and I mean really supports it; too many studies have shown that career-minded women in dual-income marriages still end up with the majority of responsibilities in maintaining the home and rearing the kids). That hits too close to home. Both my parents decided to go to work and go to school at the same time. It became obvious that one parent had to drop school so the other could pursue their career. (because of financial reasons) …
/r/MensRights08/07/13 09:58 PM
3

Wut. doch_doch is not saying that at all. They are basically saying that it is the woman's body that is going through the physical toll. Not the man's. And that is, like, important to comprehend.
/r/MensRights08/07/13 09:18 PM
1

Stay classy misters of MRA!
/r/MensRights08/07/13 05:17 AM
1

Agreed. This whole argument was a bit of a stretch just to have a pathetic jab at feminists. (Which is not too surprising with this sub.) Hell, I only clicked on the link because it said Sims. I like the Sims. :3
/r/MensRights19/06/13 04:52 PM
1

Good looking people can be creepy too. It is not the looks that makes a person creepy. It is their behavior.
/r/MensRights19/06/13 09:13 AM
4

I feel that in Hansen's position, using the word 'dick' would still cause an uproar because of how ridiculously unprofessional the word is. It's simply inappropriate. Hansen's comment should offend EVERYONE, though. Not just feminists.
/r/MensRights19/04/13 02:59 AM
4

I personally think he would. The use of the words 'dick' or 'vagina' just sounds very unprofessional and disrespectful. A person is more than their sexual organs whether man or woman. Yeah, Hansen apologized, but it still kind of sucks that a politician would use such language to demean an entire group.
/r/MensRights19/04/13 01:09 AM
1

Better to be safe then sorry? I just see that as common sense. She doesn't know the men, and she's in the friggin woods. She's just playing it safe. Nothing wrong with that.
/r/MensRights12/04/13 10:33 PM
2

Thank you for taking the time to say your point of view. I don't mean to sound naive, but why isn't pre-nups not on the rise if it's that big of a problem for people (in a financial sense)? And how I see it is more of her reasoning WHY she does or doesn't want to take her future husband's last name. I don't see anything wrong with being traditional in that sense. But I feel a person can very well be committed to another human being without necessarily taking their last name.
/r/TheRedPill31/03/13 08:47 PM
2

Yeah. I get what you're saying as well previously. I guess this is a classic "to each his or her own" kind of thing.
/r/TheRedPill31/03/13 07:57 PM
1

How is that a deal breaker, though? Why can't my husband rejoice in taking my last name (as a woman)? Or what if I want to hyphenate both our last names? I know 'deal breakers' can vary for people, but this one seems kind of a stretch. (Personally.)
/r/TheRedPill31/03/13 07:23 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter