| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 141 | Something funny to add to all the seriousness (x-post from r/funny) | ImFromDateline | /r/MensRights | 08/12/12 08:03 AM | |
| 116 | I don't know how accurate it is, but it is a huge step in the right direction. | ImFromDateline | /r/MensRights | 17/04/13 12:43 AM | |
| 60 | The title of this was: I told my girlfriend that I didn't want to have sex because I was too tired. So right before we got it on she said this. (X-Post From AdviceAnimals) | ImFromDateline | /r/MensRights | 28/12/12 09:10 AM | |
| 24 | Thought my college was better than most, guess I was wrong... | ImFromDateline | /r/MensRights | 02/02/13 12:48 AM |
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | My fiancée wants me to buy a second home — in her name only - MarketWatch - No Red Flags Here!Very true. You are correct, a simple "in some states" would have been useful. I apologize for not being clear. | /r/MensRights | 21/07/16 08:14 PM |
| 3 | My fiancée wants me to buy a second home — in her name only - MarketWatch - No Red Flags Here!I was speaking generally, but a large majority of the time, this is correct. Didn't feel the need to preface it with that disclaimer. | /r/MensRights | 21/07/16 07:30 PM |
| 5 | My fiancée wants me to buy a second home — in her name only - MarketWatch - No Red Flags Here!Just to be clear, in a marriage, title doesn't mean jack shit. If the property is acquired during marriage, it is marital property unless the property was acquired by means of non-marital property (inheritance, selling non-marital property to purchase this new property). In other words, yeah this is a huge red flag, but as long as they do it while married, the guy is safely able to take his equitable portion of the marital estate, including the house. | /r/MensRights | 21/07/16 06:27 PM |
| 1 | DNA proves man isn't girl's father but he must pay support anywayIf he doesn't know then the 30 days is irrelevant because holding someone accountable for something they had no knowledge occurred would be insane. The 30 days (or 60 I can't remember) is only relevant when he consented to being put on the certificate but later found out that he consented because of fraudulent actions by some party. | /r/MensRights | 21/07/16 04:09 AM |
| 3 | DNA proves man isn't girl's father but he must pay support anywayThanks! I need all the luck I can get. | /r/MensRights | 21/07/16 03:38 AM |
| 0 | DNA proves man isn't girl's father but he must pay support anywaySure man. Clearly I advocate for the slavery of men. I hope that men everywhere including myself are enslaved. Come on, an explanation for WHY something is happening doesn't mean that I condone it. I can explain WHY the middle east is fucked and WHY they are doing it to themselves, but I don't agree with it. It is all about knowing why something is occurring and how to protect yourself and prevent it from happening any further. | /r/MensRights | 21/07/16 02:34 AM |
| 1 | DNA proves man isn't girl's father but he must pay support anywayNot an explanation for why it is good, just why it is happening. I want it to change. I am currently studying for the BAR to become a lawyer and I am going to be the change I wish to see. I am just afraid that more people will be caught in the web that the government has spun and I want to make sure that people are aware to be able to protect themselves. Knowledge is indeed power. | /r/MensRights | 21/07/16 01:46 AM |
| 3 | DNA proves man isn't girl's father but he must pay support anywayYes you are completely right, I was just trying to find the closest analogy. | /r/MensRights | 21/07/16 01:43 AM |
| 1 | DNA proves man isn't girl's father but he must pay support anywayVery true | /r/MensRights | 21/07/16 01:38 AM |
| 2 | DNA proves man isn't girl's father but he must pay support anywayCivil action is a great way to be heard, however, the wheels of justice turn slow, and the wheels of statutory change turn even slower. The same argument has been used for weed and its usage. People are sitting in jails for a victimless crime. Somehow the jailers sleep tight. | /r/MensRights | 21/07/16 01:38 AM |
| 2 | DNA proves man isn't girl's father but he must pay support anywayShould be broken indeed. However, family law is a whole other animal. It won't break it. Its about as ass-backwards as you can get. | /r/MensRights | 21/07/16 01:35 AM |
| 3 | DNA proves man isn't girl's father but he must pay support anywayI agree inconsistencies are everywhere you look. I hope one day to make a difference in these crazy laws, at least try to. | /r/MensRights | 21/07/16 01:34 AM |
| 3 | DNA proves man isn't girl's father but he must pay support anywayI just wanted to make it clear, I was not commenting on the exact situation that the article was presenting. I prefaced it so that people would understand I was only explaining the law behind what possibly was happening. I am not defending the law, I am simply explaining it and the rational behind it. I am 100% with you. The law is insane and stupid. Just a quick aside, is your percent symbol different? it looks like (c/o) instead of (o/o). | /r/MensRights | 21/07/16 01:14 AM |
| 3 | DNA proves man isn't girl's father but he must pay support anywayIf he never met the kid, never fathered the kid in any way (implied by not meeting the child), and never consented to his name on the birth certificate, he should be alright as long as he can prove he never consented. | /r/MensRights | 21/07/16 12:59 AM |
| -1 | DNA proves man isn't girl's father but he must pay support anywaySure, but thats a slippery slope of literally everything being tied to benefit. Metal refineries so there are more hand cuffs, road workers because the cops have to drive faster to catch all the bad guys, and donut shops because more cops will get hungry with the increasing load of "bad" guys. /s | /r/MensRights | 21/07/16 12:47 AM |
| 30 | DNA proves man isn't girl's father but he must pay support anywayYou are right, child support payments will NEVER go away once they are issued, you can only stop the future payments. | /r/MensRights | 21/07/16 12:22 AM |
| 3 | DNA proves man isn't girl's father but he must pay support anywayThe state REALLY needs to look into exactly what you said. Paternity tests upon birth should be mandatory. That way no one looks like the bad guy for asking for it. I get your analogy, but look at it not from a criminal perspective, but one of public policy. In your example, the man going to jail for a crime he did not commit does not benefit the public in any way, in fact there is a net negative effect. In the example of a man paying child support there is a net positive effect (generally) of a… | /r/MensRights | 21/07/16 12:01 AM |
| -10 | DNA proves man isn't girl's father but he must pay support anywayIn a perfect world yes that would be amazing. If the state could pay for the upbringing of all children, regardless of parental support, that would be a perfect solution. However, that isn't feasible with the state of the current economy. There is too much waste and governmental red tape to do such a thing. I am not saying what is happening is right. But its the current law and everyone should be aware, thats why I commented. I wanted to make sure that other were aware WHY this horrible thing is… | /r/MensRights | 20/07/16 11:56 PM |
| -31 | DNA proves man isn't girl's father but he must pay support anywayEdit: Guys please, I am not the enemy here, I am just trying to inform, downvoting is only hurting us. If you do plan on downvoting me at least read what I wrote so it won't happen to you. Its going to be a long painful road for that man if he loses. Disclaimer: Didn't read the article. A little background on family law. In order for the man to pay child support he must have been on the birth certificate as the father, act as the father, or make himself out to be the father. In order for the bir… | /r/MensRights | 20/07/16 11:03 PM |
| 1 | Student's career ruined because he reminded rape victim of attackerIm in law school right now, the laws we use everyone day are fairly archaic because most of the case law comes from cases older then most everyone in my class. Old laws don't always reflect the new way of thinking. | /r/MensRights | 09/03/15 07:35 PM |
| 8 | I don't know how accurate it is, but it is a huge step in the right direction.Could you point me to a more appropriate number? | /r/MensRights | 17/04/13 01:55 AM |
| 5 | I don't know how accurate it is, but it is a huge step in the right direction.I think that is slightly pessimistic but understandable way of looking at it. And are you saying that the statistic presented is not true? | /r/MensRights | 17/04/13 01:40 AM |
| 4 | I don't know how accurate it is, but it is a huge step in the right direction.They had multiple signs up about both genders. I can try and take more pictures tomorrow if I remember. They seemed not too biased. But, hey, at this point I'll take what I can get. | /r/MensRights | 17/04/13 01:39 AM |
| 9 | I don't know how accurate it is, but it is a huge step in the right direction.Had to look up what that was, I hate you. | /r/MensRights | 17/04/13 01:20 AM |
| 3 | Vocal Feminist Judge apologises for lying about Fathers group making death threats .This is very true. But people are quick to forget infraction such as this. | /r/MensRights | 28/02/13 04:53 PM |
| 17 | Vocal Feminist Judge apologises for lying about Fathers group making death threats .Its a step in the right direction. However, maybe i didn't see it, but she never came out and said she lied. She basically said that she may have improperly implied that the Fathers4Justice Group made the death threats and that she is sorry for that people implied that she accidentally implied that they made the death threats. I just wish people would own up to what they do and not dance around it. | /r/MensRights | 28/02/13 04:34 PM |
| 7 | Apparently men can't have a gym and ribs night at university without it being undone by feminists and white knights.This is tame, from what I have read before this is almost equivalent to a glowing recommendation of men from a feminist perspective. You will find much, much, MUCH worse. | /r/MensRights | 13/02/13 03:06 PM |
| 14 | Women victim-blaming male rape victimThat statement sums up the entire article. She should have just started with that, made sure everyone was aware of the vile information she was spewing. | /r/MensRights | 12/02/13 04:50 AM |
| 1 | Is this satire? This has to be satire.What did I just look at? | /r/MensRights | 07/02/13 05:12 PM |
| 14 | Marc Rudov has Testicles the Size of Wrecking BallsThats a fact! (Citation?) | /r/MensRights | 05/02/13 06:28 PM |
| 2 | How a radical feminist views her husband: "...he’s just an alien in the home. He helps out a lot with the kids, which I used to appreciate, but now I realise it’s another form of dominance, of tryingIm commenting to save this masterpiece, well done. | /r/MensRights | 03/02/13 08:47 PM |
| -2 | Thought my college was better than most, guess I was wrong...Totally agree, I was tempted to put the title as "Said no one ever" | /r/MensRights | 02/02/13 01:46 AM |
| 1 | Thought my college was better than most, guess I was wrong...Thats sort of the point. This isn't really saying anything. But without making any sense it does two major thing. First makes the connection that Men = Rape and secondly does not have a equal statement for a possible women being a rapist. This person does both without making a drop of sense. Also, this is a school organization posting this, with permission from the school, that is another reason that is an issue. | /r/MensRights | 02/02/13 01:12 AM |
| 5 | Thought my college was better than most, guess I was wrong...Thats actually a good idea... | /r/MensRights | 02/02/13 12:55 AM |
| 52 | INSANITY : Boyfriend refuses to marry but gives her money, she is MAD and sues for 56000 dollars/month.Most of the links I click on here make me mad, but this is just a completely different monster. This is so... insane. In a country that has NO common-law partners AND he is already paying her an incredible sum of momey, she has the nerve to demand more? Because what? She dated him? She was his girlfriend. Thats all. 1 day or 10 years makes no difference. She had three kids with him and he was paying for everything for them. He is doing the right thing. This is just, unreal. If the decision is up… | /r/MensRights | 19/01/13 07:14 AM |
| 8 | Legal scholars' proposal to punish males for first time, unprotected sexWait, I just need to check see if this is an Onion news story... Well hot damn! Its not! This is /r/nottheonion material. | /r/MensRights | 12/01/13 09:30 PM |
| 1 | The title of this was: I told my girlfriend that I didn't want to have sex because I was too tired. So right before we got it on she said this. (X-Post From AdviceAnimals)Wasn't posting it as a meme, more as to show what people see as funny. Be less rigid, people obviously liked it and upvoted it and commented on it. Your job isn't to be mindless it is to protect the sub, which removing this does not. | /r/MensRights | 28/12/12 11:18 PM |
| 19 | The title of this was: I told my girlfriend that I didn't want to have sex because I was too tired. So right before we got it on she said this. (X-Post From AdviceAnimals)I personally find this terrible. I mean can you imagine if a girl said a guy said this? The comments would be "Leave that man now!" or "Call the police!" Instead one of the top comments is "That sounds a little rape-y." Not even serious. I don't know how people think this is funny. | /r/MensRights | 28/12/12 09:11 AM |
| 7 | Drug-addict woman gets 4 years for shooting a man to death.More to do with the lack there of. The way I think OP approached this was to show that a women who lied to the police, got arrested for driving under the influence TO HER COURT CASE, and murdered a man only got 4 years and the writer was being so gentle with the killer it was like she simply got a speeding ticket, not ending a persons life. If a man killed a women then, it think this is the point, a female author like the one that wrote this story, wouldn't be writing about his medical issues bu… | /r/MensRights | 12/12/12 05:23 AM |
| 0 | Woman stabs university student in the back during consensual sexual encounter, but he's arrested after she falsely accuses him of rapeDid anyone read the second comment on the blog? It reads: I know that one should never blame the victim - that is a truism now, isn't it? Or maybe only if the "victim" is female? It's so complicated that I can't keep up with who should be "blamed" when. That this guy allowed "knife play" even to begin bespeaks tremendous stupidity, never mind that it was with a woman (psycho) he had just met. That he would turn his back on her (knife still present) after she had scratched him qualifies him for n… | /r/MensRights | 07/12/12 05:55 PM |
| 4 | Just an FYI: The Warren Farrell protest video is in danger of being forcibly taken off of youtube.Did you even watch the video? People like you just talk and never actually listen. | /r/MensRights | 05/12/12 05:39 PM |
| 6 | Sometimes there is JusticeI am surprised this isn't considered kidnapping of some type. | /r/MensRights | 05/12/12 05:02 AM |
| 13 | Just an FYI: The Warren Farrell protest video is in danger of being forcibly taken off of youtube.Remember if you are a straight white males you should hate yourself and everything you stand for, regardless of what you actually think or believe, you are a rapist and want to rape all women. | /r/MensRights | 05/12/12 04:00 AM |
| 7 | Woman admits she filed rape report after not enjoying dateIf we watch this story I can almost promise you they just sweep it under the rug. With something like "She had been drinking" or "She was emotionally overwhelmed" or some sorry ass excuse which will let her off with a slap on the wrists and a stern talking to. | /r/MensRights | 04/12/12 09:37 AM |
| 2 | Petition to ban twitter posts from /r/MRAI sort of agree. I agree with not starting a circle-jerk but some tweets might be beneficial. I need more evidence against. | /r/MensRights | 03/12/12 07:59 PM |
| 9 | Why do YOU need feminism?Took me a couple but I got it :D You can tell there are some really deep background stories in a couple of those posts. OP needs to get to the top of mensrights | /r/MensRights | 03/12/12 06:59 PM |
| 16 | Female teacher convicted of having sex with teenage student. Gets probation.You have to wonder what the prosecutor was thinking when they allowed this. To me this is sexism. Plain and clear. | /r/MensRights | 30/11/12 09:18 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter