| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | This movie theater has a women’s restroom an a gender neutral one, no men’sAll the Habit Burgers near me do this. Really weird. | /r/MensRights | 02/01/20 03:24 AM |
| 4 | Can't be my manYea that’s below minimum wage... before taxes. | /r/PussyPassDenied | 30/10/19 12:42 PM |
| 0 | Its a mans fault. Of cource. Well since Jake too was drunk he could not give legal consent either. So did they rape each other?Yea it’s kinda sad. It’s such an extreme reaction | /r/MensRights | 18/10/19 02:05 PM |
| 2 | Its a mans fault. Of cource. Well since Jake too was drunk he could not give legal consent either. So did they rape each other?Thanks for really driving the point in 😂 | /r/MensRights | 18/10/19 12:54 PM |
| 2 | Its a mans fault. Of cource. Well since Jake too was drunk he could not give legal consent either. So did they rape each other?You seem to be really hung up on this whole age thing. Insecure much? | /r/MensRights | 18/10/19 12:39 PM |
| 1 | Its a mans fault. Of cource. Well since Jake too was drunk he could not give legal consent either. So did they rape each other?When did I scream virgin? That’s not what I’m doing I’m simply pointing out the lean towards woman hating that some people are going towards in this thread. I mean all i have to do is look at your post history and it seems like you’re obsessed with this idea of avoiding women, you can’t stop making posts about it. It clearly consumes your mind to an interesting degree. | /r/MensRights | 18/10/19 12:10 PM |
| 1 | Its a mans fault. Of cource. Well since Jake too was drunk he could not give legal consent either. So did they rape each other?Who else should so react to? Am i now obligated to respond to every comment on this post? What are you getting at? | /r/MensRights | 18/10/19 12:08 PM |
| -4 | Its a mans fault. Of cource. Well since Jake too was drunk he could not give legal consent either. So did they rape each other?Wanting to be in a relation = needing validation? | /r/MensRights | 18/10/19 03:47 AM |
| -11 | Its a mans fault. Of cource. Well since Jake too was drunk he could not give legal consent either. So did they rape each other?This thread is very borderline /r/incel, jesus | /r/MensRights | 18/10/19 02:40 AM |
| 3 | Men beware of fertile females: Motherhood by theft? Women have been ‘baby-trapping’ men by getting pregnant without their consent for decades. But in this internet era, the game has changed and stepped up a notch.I’ve had a vasectomy. My doctor (who now exclusively does vasectomies and reversals) has about an 80% success rate with reversals. Only costs about $2000 to get it reversed too. My vasectomy was completely free with insurance. No needle no scalpel procedure. Done on a friday, back to work monday. Honestly believe every man should get one even if they want kids down the lien. Then you get to choose when to have them and not from accidents | /r/MensRights | 11/08/19 02:52 PM |
| 1 | Im speechlessI mean she’s not wrong. Men are more violent / aggressive than women on average and especially true within the extremes. If her conclusion is that men are bad though, it’s ridiculous. A tiny fraction of one percent of men being that violent is not representative of the rest of us. | /r/MensRights | 08/08/19 06:13 PM |
| 2 | Tinder experiment that only looks matter to women-not personality or behavior.Except this data set doesn’t show the amount of women that saw this profile and nope’d out real quick. So judging all women for this is a little ridiculous | /r/MensRights | 01/08/19 03:28 AM |
| 8 | Get woke, go broke. Gillette SJW ads cost Proctor & Gamble a net of 5.25 billion dollars following an 8 billion dollar non-cash writedown. In other words, they had to write off 8 billion dollars because people stopped buying Gillette razors.To those switching just get off the disposables. I bought this guy years ago for $25 and all i have to do is buy disposable blades (Like $10 for 100), that’ll last me about a year and a half if not longer. And it’s a way better shave IMO than the disposable stuff. Better for the environment too | /r/MensRights | 01/08/19 01:19 AM |
| 1 | Tinder study via Science Direct: "Male subjects liked 61.9% of female profiles, female subjects liked only 4.5% of male."Climate change is an issue but a don’t see how it will lead to the extinction of humans. Especially not in the near future | /r/MensRights | 26/07/19 08:21 PM |
| 0 | Tinder study via Science Direct: "Male subjects liked 61.9% of female profiles, female subjects liked only 4.5% of male."How are we putting our entire planet into a state of mass extinction? | /r/MensRights | 26/07/19 03:56 PM |
| 1 | Tinder study via Science Direct: "Male subjects liked 61.9% of female profiles, female subjects liked only 4.5% of male."But that’s what I’m saying, not all feminists are going for the same goals or stand for the same thing. So before you get into a deep conversation about it you really do need to define what you are talking about. | /r/MensRights | 26/07/19 11:32 AM |
| 1 | Tinder study via Science Direct: "Male subjects liked 61.9% of female profiles, female subjects liked only 4.5% of male."No i was simply stating common sexual selection theory as an example to why OPs posts study shows this. Just our biological tendencies. I’m not arguing against equality of opportunity. I’m also not redefining feminism, not sure where you got that. | /r/MensRights | 26/07/19 09:36 AM |
| -1 | Tinder study via Science Direct: "Male subjects liked 61.9% of female profiles, female subjects liked only 4.5% of male."Yea, hopefully we find a good solution before then. Part of it is men need to step up. Part of is we need to make sure men don’t get left behind in universities. And women need to chill a bit 😂 | /r/MensRights | 26/07/19 01:19 AM |
| 1 | Tinder study via Science Direct: "Male subjects liked 61.9% of female profiles, female subjects liked only 4.5% of male."I’m sure there are places here and there we can tighten to up / continue to reinforce to hold this. I think it would be ignorant to say it’s perfectly equal across every spectrum. But is it equal for the large majority of people and instances? Absolutely | /r/MensRights | 25/07/19 10:58 PM |
| 8 | Tinder study via Science Direct: "Male subjects liked 61.9% of female profiles, female subjects liked only 4.5% of male."Don’t get me wrong, i totally see what you’re saying, but also like look around you. I think we’re doing just fine as a species 😂 | /r/MensRights | 25/07/19 09:11 PM |
| -2 | Tinder study via Science Direct: "Male subjects liked 61.9% of female profiles, female subjects liked only 4.5% of male."Yea ish. Depends on your definition of feminism, as there’s so many these days. Equality of opportunity is a no brained, but the equality of outcome they’re pushing is for sure wrong. | /r/MensRights | 25/07/19 08:54 PM |
| 7 | Tinder study via Science Direct: "Male subjects liked 61.9% of female profiles, female subjects liked only 4.5% of male."Not surprising and I don’t see anything wrong with it necessarily. It’s basic sexual selection theory. Women are more choosy and can be more selective. | /r/MensRights | 25/07/19 07:30 PM |
| 1 | Woman actually gets depressed because r/r/mensrights has subscribers, and questions how mens "rights" can be taken seriouslyYea, the claim I was most interested in was that women’s suffrage wasn’t about voting rights for women to be equal to men, but for women to basically control the votes. OP (Not sure if it was you, he deleted the comment) claimed at the time only 15% of men, the wealthy ones, could vote. And that allowing all women to vote was a way for women to take control of our country. | /r/MensRights | 14/07/19 12:32 AM |
| 4 | Woman actually gets depressed because r/r/mensrights has subscribers, and questions how mens "rights" can be taken seriouslyI’m not looking for debate either. I’m simply asking for your sources for a pretty, at least conventionally, radical claim. Also yes I’m familiar with Jordan Peterson as well. | /r/MensRights | 13/07/19 01:04 AM |
| 11 | Woman actually gets depressed because r/r/mensrights has subscribers, and questions how mens "rights" can be taken seriouslyYea that’s one thing I was curious about. I haven’t seen the movie but from reading the summary it seems pretty straight forward and like I would probably agree with most of it. The Sub however... Not quite | /r/MensRights | 12/07/19 10:52 PM |
| 9 | Woman actually gets depressed because r/r/mensrights has subscribers, and questions how mens "rights" can be taken seriouslyCould you recommend any sources / reading materials for your claims? If you want us to up but claim it won’t come up on google, not sure where else to search. | /r/MensRights | 12/07/19 10:15 PM |
| 57 | Woman actually gets depressed because r/r/mensrights has subscribers, and questions how mens "rights" can be taken seriouslyIs this considered a pro red pill sub? | /r/MensRights | 12/07/19 10:05 PM |
| 1 | Girl Scouts sue Boy Scouts over trademark as boys welcome girlsDo you have a source? I did try googling but couldn’t find anything saying that :/ Unless you mean they were “forced to” to save their business? But it seems to still have been a completely internal decision. I also don’t see the point of your jabs at the end of every single one of your comments. Can we just have a friendly dialogue about this? | /r/MensRights | 12/07/19 12:27 PM |
| 1 | Girl Scouts sue Boy Scouts over trademark as boys welcome girlsBoy scouts were not forced to admit girls. They chose to. They were also not forced to change their name. They chose to. Everything else is totally unrelated to what we’re talking about so not sure why you went down that road. I’m not saying there aren’t issues facing men in society. | /r/MensRights | 12/07/19 12:01 PM |
| 1 | Girl Scouts sue Boy Scouts over trademark as boys welcome girlsLmao I didn’t mean translate it. | /r/MensRights | 12/07/19 11:31 AM |
| -1 | Girl Scouts sue Boy Scouts over trademark as boys welcome girlsCorrect me if I’m wrong because i skimmed the article on my lunch break, but according to the article, BSA on its on decided to allow women in since its membership was facing a massive decline. Because of this they decided to rebrand and change their names to Scouts, which now girl scouts is sueing because they don’t think Scouts has ownership of that term. That it infringes upon girl scouts. | /r/MensRights | 11/07/19 09:50 PM |
| 0 | Girl Scouts sue Boy Scouts over trademark as boys welcome girlsWell yea. I guess i just don’t get what this has to do with Men’s Rights | /r/MensRights | 11/07/19 09:34 PM |
| 1 | Girl Scouts sue Boy Scouts over trademark as boys welcome girlsCare to enlighten? | /r/MensRights | 11/07/19 09:01 PM |
| -4 | Girl Scouts sue Boy Scouts over trademark as boys welcome girlsDid literally no one here read the article. It has only to do with branding. They’re not complaining about equality or anything like that. | /r/MensRights | 11/07/19 03:13 PM |
| -1 | Riley Reid openly admitting to rape compilationAnyone have the actual link to the video? | /r/MensRights | 10/07/19 06:01 PM |
| 1 | If you say uncut penises stink; you should probably sleep with more hygienic men.Never been with a fat chick.. is that a thing with their labia? 😂 | /r/MensRights | 10/07/19 04:20 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter