TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ImSorryItsAnonymous Archive

View 5 posts and 38 comments by ImSorryItsAnonymous on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
20

I normally won't nitpick off topic, but I've seen it used incorrectly several times in the last couple of days. It's 'toe the line' not 'tow the line'. See http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toe_the_line
/r/MensRights01/02/14 05:57 PM
2

I just wanted to toss this out there as a further example of how this isn't a black and white issue. Interestingly, I looked at the facts as well and came to the conclusion that no matter how wrong abortion is, it must be allowed (with certain constraints). I boiled it down to the fact that it's a contest of rights between one life and another (let's call them "host" and "occupant"). The abortion debate is about when (and whether) the occupant's rights outweigh the rights of the host. I'm agains…
/r/MensRights07/01/14 04:29 AM
5

Catherine Comins: http://falserapesociety.blogspot.com/2010/05/catherine-comins-actual-quote-about.html
/r/MensRights06/01/14 05:15 AM
11

That piece is exceedingly painful to read through if you have no idea what is going on. This article has better coverage http://jonathanturley.org/2013/07/15/texas-judge-under-fire-after-disclosure-that-she-texted-prosecutor-during-trial-with-suggested-examination-questions/
/r/MensRights16/12/13 11:02 PM
4

One quick clarification on your statements... You cannot accurately conclude that 37% of the rapists were women (or calculate how many were men) because it doesn't take into account repeat rapists (and if memory serves, it covers individuals who were raped, not number of rapes). 37% of rapes were perpetrated by women, but the ratio (or number) of individual rapists can't be calculated from the available data unless we assume 1 rape = 1 rapist or that the likelihood of a woman repeatedly raping i…
/r/MensRights30/10/13 10:08 AM
6

The problem with patriarchy theory is there is no way to prove or disprove its existence. In fact, we could have 100% female representation at the top of the class structure and it could still be attributed to patriarchy theory. It makes no predictions and there is nothing testable to verify that it does not exist (ie, when we have legal and societal equality). Personally, I have issues with very few people who call themselves feminists. However, I have issues with every feminist group and organ…
/r/MensRights21/10/13 05:39 PM
3

Have a look at http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1krtxo/mensrights_reference_builder_lets_talk_subject/ . Some of us started collecting what the laws were and I personally got to frustrated with the state of them to continue. They're pretty easy to dig up for U.S. states if you're familiar with reading laws at all.
/r/MensRights26/09/13 04:52 AM
5

And I'm done for now...I forgot how depressing it was in most states.
/r/MensRights21/08/13 03:45 AM
5

[Kentucky] Source: http://www.lrc.ky.gov/Statutes/chapter.aspx?id=39376 I'm not going to copy every single statue here...it's bad, though. The only offenses that include female perpetrators are: Rape in the third degree Sodomy in the third degree Sexual Abuse in the first, second or third degree Men can only be the victims of Sodomy or Sexual Abuse Summary: almost every single sexual offense is stated as "he..." and not "he or she".
/r/MensRights21/08/13 03:43 AM
5

[Kansas] Source: http://www.kslegislature.org/li_2012/b2011_12/statute/021_000_0000_chapter/021_055_0000_article/021_055_0003_section/021_055_0003_k/ 21-5503. Rape. (a) Rape is: (1) Knowingly engaging in sexual intercourse with a victim who does not consent to the sexual intercourse under any of the following circumstances: (A) When the victim is overcome by force or fear; or (B) when the victim is unconscious or physically powerless; (2) Knowingly engaging in sexual intercourse with a victim wh…
/r/MensRights21/08/13 03:30 AM
5

Gonna start throwing a few in here, I've got a bunch saved off that I've never done anything with. [Texas] Source: http://www.statutes.legis.state.tx.us/Docs/PE/htm/PE.22.htm Sec. 22.011. SEXUAL ASSAULT. (a) A person commits an offense if the person: (1) intentionally or knowingly: (A) causes the penetration of the anus or sexual organ of another person by any means, without that person's consent; (B) causes the penetration of the mouth of another person by the sexual organ of the actor, without…
/r/MensRights21/08/13 03:19 AM
5

For New York, have a look at this thread. The law recently changed/amendment will go into place soon modifying it a bit.
/r/MensRights21/08/13 03:10 AM
2

Have a look at http://www.politicalcompass.org/analysis2 . In the U.S. (and many other places) the difference between political candidates/parties/entities is vanishingly small with only a few key "causes" that are different. I'd suggest going through the "test" they have to see where you fall. When I took it, I fell within the Libertarian Left (roughly around the Dalai Lama), which pretty quickly showed why I have huge issues with pretty much every candidate in the U.S. (presedential, senate, h…
/r/MensRights05/08/13 09:57 PM
1

The way the Bill is set up, it modifies the existing Article 130. Previously, all entries used "sexual intercourse" and are modified to instead use "criminal sexual conduct" as defined above. I agree they are missing the definition for sexual intercourse, however, from the Bill wording, the previous for rape in the 1st degree: S 130.35 Rape in the first degree. A person is guilty of rape in the first degree when he or she engages in sexual intercourse with another person: 1. By forcible compulsi…
/r/MensRights09/07/13 03:42 AM
33

Reposting this as a top level comment as a few threads in here are working on the assumption of the title and contents of the article, which are in conflict with the actual contents of the bill. I was curious of this as well and so I dug it up. It's Senate Bill S06877 http://legiscan.com/NY/text/S06877/id/622188 and Assembly Bill 3339 http://assembly.state.ny.us/leg/?default_fld=&bn=A03339&Summary=Y&Text=Y . The law that's being modified is Article 130 of New York Penal Law, available at http://…
/r/MensRights07/07/13 03:55 AM
4

I was curious of this as well and so I dug it up. It's Senate Bill S06877 http://legiscan.com/NY/text/S06877/id/622188 and Assembly Bill 3339 http://assembly.state.ny.us/leg/?default_fld=&bn=A03339&Summary=Y&Text=Y . The law that's being modified is Article 130 of New York Penal Law, available at http://ypdcrime.com/penal.law/article130.htm . My understanding from the wording is the definition is changed as follows (pulled from the Senate Bill, Assembly Bill is much more verbose): 3 14. "CRIMINA…
/r/MensRights07/07/13 01:32 AM
2

I have no problems at all with the average person who identifies themselves as a feminist. I have a problem with the core theories and foundations that Feminism is built on and the fact that the politically powerful Feminism lobby/movement has as much of an impact that it does. I've only met 2 people in person who identified themselves as feminists that held the same beliefs as the actions of the Feminist groups showed. Most people who identify as feminist have bought into the statement that it'…
/r/MensRights14/06/13 12:36 AM
-1

If he legally adopts the kid, he technically has the same rights as a biological father should they separate. The reality is that it would be a slightly harder struggle for custody than currently exists (which is an obscene fight to get anything reasonable already) if he were to adopt him. If he doesn't adopt the child, a prenup will do absolutely nothing to protect him from paying child support.
/r/MensRights15/05/13 04:09 AM
-2

He's going to be filling the role of father to the kid, or he's going to just be the guy that's married to his mom. I don't care which route he goes, he just needs to fully commit one way or the other. He's not going to be an uncle, or a teacher, or any other close male figure, he's going to be acting as the kid's dad. I personally think that route should be to fully commit to being the kid's father, through adoption, to get all the rights and responsibilities, but I can completely understand wa…
/r/MensRights15/05/13 04:07 AM
-12

Here's the deal, I think you're out of line for only asking for a prenup. The kid's father isn't in the picture, you love the kid like your own, you want to give the kid a sibling. But if things go south with the mother, you want nothing to do with the kid. If you love the kid like your own, adopt him. Make him your own. If you're going to be his father, BE HIS FATHER. That way, if things go south, custody arrangements is what is discussed, not whether or not you're going to still be a father to…
/r/MensRights15/05/13 02:58 AM
1

Patriarchy: society is built around a polar division between femininity and masculinity. Tautological statement. It does not bring us any closer to the definition. It is a bit redundant, but this division is a core part of understanding the definition of patriarchy and I wanted to express it in a way that didn't require any prior knowledge. Success, status and power are all achieved and reachable through traits that are only associated with masculinity. This is all there is to this entire defini…
/r/MensRights08/05/13 07:14 PM
1

The definition you listed requires a background/knowledge of some of the pieces used to define patriarchy. I worked to try and make is so that an individual didn't need any prior knowledge to understand it (which obviously meant that it's not nearly as concise). I disagree with your other statements, but don't have the time to cover all the reasons why (it's suitable for it's own paper/essay, which I intend to publish at some point) but wanted to explain why I didn't go with a more concise defin…
/r/MensRights08/05/13 06:56 PM
2

I believe a lot of the reason it's difficult to find information out of academic sources isn't because of a lack of concensus, instead that everything outside academia is the application of the theories. They are de facto assumed to not need explanation as they form the foundation of beliefs. Or that most available sources outside academia only understand a watered down definition that they believe is obvious and doesn't need stating. I agree that the shift that occured is disheartening and that…
/r/MensRights08/05/13 06:48 PM
2

Get a bottle of tea tree oil and a moderately fine toothed comb (wider than the thin part of a normal comb, but thinner than the wide part of a normal comb). Combing just a little bit through does wonders for fixing the itchiness and any skin irritation. Coconut milk and argan oil will also make it nice and manageable/soft. Mine doesn't get itchy until significantly later than yours, but combing against the grain and then with the grain helped a bunch as well. It took about 2 weeks to get past t…
/r/MensRights03/05/13 03:16 PM
1

Growing up, I had both my parents there (even though they should have been divorced and eventually separated long after I had moved out), but we moved every 6 months to a year (occasionally 2). There was no way to build stable, long-lasting friendships. Every time I switched schools I had to re-prove to the administration and teachers that I wasn't just some impoverished child of people who couldn't hold down a job, but instead really wanted to learn to improve myself and situation. Your child n…
/r/MensRights12/04/13 06:46 PM
2

'None' of it was my own spending. They did things like create a bank account in my name, add their names to it, use it for a while, then eventually start writing bad checks on it. Or put the phone bill in my name and then eventually not be able to pay it and just let it go to collections. Because everything had already been passed over to collection agencies, the documentation I would have been able to use to prove it wasn't me was already gone (copies of checks that were written, itemized credi…
/r/MensRights04/03/13 05:13 PM
1

I got a large number of things dismissed, but this was a few decades ago when they did it, before debit cards and before credit cards were as commonplace (and included many of the consumer protections that exist now). I never did end up needing to declare bankruptcy, there was about $40,000 in debts/collections I couldn't get dismissed (that had hung around for about 10 years at that point) that I just paid off for pennies on the dollar, one account at a time. Since then I've never used credit f…
/r/MensRights04/03/13 08:13 AM
1

The range in differences between 'types' of rape (statutory rape vs. violent stranger rape), the varying legal definitions of what is rape and the data collection that then use independent definitions of rape has recently led me to decide that there shouldn't be a special crime of 'rape'. Instead, it's all different levels of sexual assault (similar in structure to U.S. Federal law). We then have no gender bias in the laws or legal definitions, the courts and prosecutors have much more leeway in…
/r/MensRights03/03/13 07:23 PM
14

The 7 year credit limit WILL NOT help your credit out. Those accounts you're waiting to disappear off of there? They will be bundled up and sold off to different collection agencies, where they will become a new account, keeping it active and on your credit. I would strongly suggest getting a consultation from a bankruptcy lawyer (free consultation, don't pay money for it). A chapter 7 will discharge everything (nearly everything, but in your case it should be everything) and after 2 years you c…
/r/MensRights02/03/13 06:19 PM
1

Revealed too much identifying info. Pming my message.
/r/MensRights20/02/13 05:32 AM
7

I don't post frequently, but I read every day. I saw this when it was first posted and wanted to comment, but I prefer to stay anonymous, at a minimum pseudonymous. Coming back to the subreddit this evening, however, made me sad at the amount sarcastic or unhelpful comments. I'm circumcised and my penis looks exactly like it should (for a circumcised penis). However, I suffer from decreased sensitivity. Not, oh a little bit, but a significant amount. I can barely tell when something is touching …
/r/MensRights12/02/13 02:06 AM
1

First off, I apologize and wanted to clarify that I didn't mean to insinuate at all that your mother was an example of those with mild symptoms in my above post, but that there are some people who do have only a mild set of symptoms compared to others. I was reading the whole statement, but coming to an entirely different conclusion of what you were saying than what was intended. What I was getting from your comments was that your mother was an extraordinary person who dealt with and overcame de…
/r/MensRights27/12/12 03:04 AM
1

I think we're in a lot of agreement here. It's not definitively a disabling condition, but at the same time, it's not guaranteed to not be disabling based on the requirements for disability and depends entirely on the person with the condition and how their symptoms manifest. The range of severity of symptoms is so wide that someone can have fibromyalgia with no noticeable outward effects (not saying they don't have an impact, just that casual observation wouldn't recognize it, such as needing a…
/r/MensRights26/12/12 08:09 PM
1

Along the fibromyalgia lines...my fiance (10 year relationship before we decided it was about the right time to get engaged) has fibromyalgia. On her bad days, getting out of bed is a significant struggle. On her not-so-bad days (let's call them 'average') she can get around and function to where people don't notice. On her good days, she has super-hero like powers and accomplish awesome feats. However, there's no predicting the good days and the bad, so it was significantly difficult for her to…
/r/MensRights26/12/12 06:41 AM
2

You have quite a history there, but I'm not going to address that particular part of your post. Instead, I have several links that have a lot of interesting information in regards to online dating sites. The fact of the matter is that 10 messages is not going to be enough unless you managed to pick the exact right 10 people to message. This first link ( http://blog.okcupid.com/index.php/online-dating-advice-exactly-what-to-say-in-a-first-message/ ) covers statistical rates of response based on w…
/r/MensRights23/12/12 01:00 AM
1

If you read the timeline of accounts listed, he arrived in Fort Benning with the assault happening 2 weeks later. That means he was either still in inprocessing or basic training, not final duty station. Given the absurd things I saw in basic training (circa 2000) that people thought were acceptable (soldiers-in-training, not drill sergeants), it actually having occurred isn't a stretch. The command's response sounds like the handling of a blanket party or similar type of mob justice served out,…
/r/MensRights21/12/12 11:14 PM
3

It's almost 2 years old at this point, but the article provides a good amount of information and highlights victims of male sexual assault in the military, the stigma of those assaulted, and how the focus on female sexual assault (less than 20% of those that occur for soldier-on-soldier assaults) has actually brought it to focus.
/r/MensRights21/12/12 07:41 PM
2

MelonStampede covered the legal side pretty well, but there are particular scenarios that can occur that I had to deal with directly that throw a wrench into it. (one day I will do a writeup of my experiences, but it's always rough to think about...I've tried to even do a short version here and deleted it about 5 times trying to write it out...it'll have to wait for another day). So, there's good news and bad news (unless laws have changed in the past 10 years). If she puts your name on the birt…
/r/MensRights05/12/12 04:30 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter