TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Imergence Archive

View 4 posts and 28 comments by Imergence on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
38

DiscriminationImergence/r/MensRights08/09/18 05:32 PM
2

Imergence/r/MensRights27/06/18 05:38 PM
1

DiscriminationImergence/r/MensRights08/09/18 01:10 PM
0

Imergence/r/MensRights18/06/18 05:47 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Gender studies
/r/MensRights29/08/19 01:32 AM
5

I wonder what the difference in pay could be about /s
/r/MensRights29/08/19 01:32 AM
1

I would disagree if the money was explicitly for clothes and wasn't allowed to spend on other things because there was clearly enough but in this case the underwear should've been from a separate amount of money
/r/MensRights27/08/19 12:02 AM
1

I still think the daughter had enough for the necessary clothes but took advantage of the father. If the boy had at least $30 for a video game that means the daughter would've at least been able to buy a bra.
/r/MensRights26/08/19 11:28 PM
3

Neither needed to buy accessories (key word "accessory") but the daughter did. Not the boy's fault the girl valued add on items that are for looks instead of prioritising items for comfort such as bras
/r/MensRights26/08/19 01:31 AM
4

Do they think people go "oh I'm about to rape this person I better get a consent condom!"
/r/MensRights13/04/19 12:45 PM
9

Nice recovery :)
/r/MensRights03/04/19 12:11 PM
16

Did you know, there is a scenario in which water is not wet? This is when there is a single water molecule not surrounded by anything else. As being 'wet' by definition is being surrounded/in contact with water molecules.
/r/MensRights03/04/19 12:07 PM
3

I reported this a few months ago, twitter recognise it as against terms of service but do nothing about it. Proof
/r/MensRights22/02/19 11:11 PM
2

r/BeetleJuicing
/r/MensRights25/01/19 01:55 PM
5

You might want to change the title, doesn't describe the post very well, better title would be: "Student finds out teacher gives higher grades based on gender and hacks the teachers pc to give equal grades"
/r/MensRights20/01/19 06:03 PM
65

What shocks me is that people get away with this sort of thing with no repercussions.
/r/MensRights18/01/19 04:04 PM
58

Problem is: BBC is basically funded by the tax payer so you don't have a choice
/r/MensRights27/12/18 10:03 PM
3

There's no point randomly insulting people
/r/MensRights26/12/18 03:39 PM
7

I only went to try talk sense into that moderator and got banned for it. If there is a place to call out corrupt subs I feel like if I could be bothered I could bring it up there.
/r/MensRights26/12/18 03:33 PM
2

Thats a bit too far
/r/MensRights26/12/18 03:31 PM
23

Hate speech is "speech that attacks a person or group on the basis of attributes such as race, religion, ethnic origin, national origin, sex, disability, sexual orientation, or gender identity" and I don't see any of that happening around here - and anything like that does happen it isnt reflective of the overall majority. Therefore your point is wrong.
/r/MensRights26/12/18 03:30 PM
13

r/AskFemininsts I believe - it is linked elsewhere in this comment section but beware about trying to challenge that mod as they are banning people for standing up to them.
/r/MensRights26/12/18 03:27 PM
10

Personally dislike vegans but I see no reason to be prejudiced against them for that reason.
/r/MensRights26/12/18 03:26 PM
23

That made me laugh - so true. They are basically trying to be the hall monitor of that sub.
/r/MensRights26/12/18 03:25 PM
56

Looked at u/oracular_duck 's comments, they seem to be some sort of power abusing person - whenever something disagrees with their views or they disagree with a fact you get banned/warned. They also don't know about the rules of their own sub. Basically everything they say is downvoted as well
/r/MensRights26/12/18 03:23 PM
46

I believe he may have told the moderator of that sub to kill them self. If they got banned it's a valid reason. Also this , apparently calling them out to be sexist towards men is a ban.
/r/MensRights26/12/18 02:50 PM
25

Just go to OPs profile --> comments --> scroll down a bit. Should be there
/r/MensRights26/12/18 01:37 PM
11

They can't be pedophiles either! /s
/r/MensRights30/10/18 02:12 PM
1

Exactly
/r/MensRights08/09/18 08:52 PM
1

Didn't see the other post, couldn't think of a title - sorry
/r/MensRights28/06/18 07:38 PM
1

Thanks for those links will look into it
/r/MensRights27/06/18 05:42 PM
2

Currently in an argument with feminists where I am clearly stating trusted facts and they are spouting "we need equality" and apparently they are winning the argument
/r/MensRights18/05/18 10:35 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter