TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ImplodedPotatoSalad Archive

View 0 posts and 2,251 comments by ImplodedPotatoSalad on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 2,251 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-4

Thats what police is for, frankly. They dont get called in to give fair fight to a criminal...
/r/MensRights10/08/23 02:28 PM
10

Male nurses, most specialist doctors (at least where I live)...women in health here are mostly low-tier, near-zero-effort support staff...who even then do less than what is expected of them.
/r/MensRights01/08/23 08:37 AM
1

Ya, because clearly, sitting in a tree and eating shit is a better world XD
/r/MensRights01/08/23 08:35 AM
2

Meh, not really, no.
/r/MensRights01/08/23 08:34 AM
11

Because no office woman ever sexualised a male blue collar workers...LMAO. go and masturbate your emotions more, then go cry in a corner on how big bad wolf of a patriarchy stops you from doing anything...
/r/MensRights01/08/23 08:32 AM
7

If she's shitty, she will get apropriate treatment. Plain and simple.
/r/MensRights01/08/23 08:31 AM
6

What lucrative career? Most women dont aim for any sort of career, much less a lucrative one...
/r/MensRights01/08/23 02:20 AM
4

If he's paying, what is she giving in return? Do you advocate theft? Money has value, and that must be balanced by continued service. Or did you thing our money is just for an ex to take? No such thing as "mutual" or free. Ours is for us alone. Go and work, thief.
/r/MensRights01/08/23 02:18 AM
5

She can go and do onlyfans, lol. Nothingg from her ex, nothing from society. Tax money is not there for her to eat through for nothing in return. Sacrificed herself? Well...too bad, but idgaf.
/r/MensRights01/08/23 02:14 AM
2

Yet another pointer as to why a) no spousal support, alimony, etc shiuld exist, period, and b) national budgets should be gender separated - what man earned, only men should have a right to use. Women can work too - for themselves. Women control way too much of spending in families, when they should not even have a right to be informed - thats must be deemed a privilege.
/r/MensRights01/08/23 02:11 AM
4

Russia is just nazi germany 2.0, right now. Thats why.
/r/MensRights28/07/23 03:40 PM
14

Misandry "just destroys livehoods" but since its men being affected, noone cares.
/r/MensRights28/07/23 03:39 PM
8

True butnif a law enforcement officer has thst level of mental issues, then they are unfit for duty.
/r/MensRights26/07/23 12:29 AM
69

And even therr, they were an exception to the rule. Yet they expect to rule a nation. A nation they'd sacrifice nothing for...
/r/MensRights26/07/23 12:27 AM
3

So, jist a feminist, really. Its an ideology based on hate. Just check the writings of such heroes of feminism as Andrea Dvorkin...or maybe activism of Valerie Solanas. The real feminism is just criminal activity and hate speech.
/r/MensRights25/07/23 12:24 AM
2

If she doesnt loke what she gets, id say that she should go and founs a natikn from scratch. You know, like we men did.
/r/MensRights25/07/23 12:04 AM
2

Miaandry is expecting men to die for a woman's aafety in wwr, or expecting men to let the nation they built be ran by someone not of their group. Misandry is expecting us to be a "team" on our own expense, or for free for that matter. What we are and what we created is for us alone. If we own something, then we ckntrol it and make the rules over it. And what happens to women, should only be our concern when and if it directly benefits us.
/r/MensRights24/07/23 11:55 PM
4

So, jist like all women think that men owe them anything, because she has a vagina, lol. You get what you give...
/r/MensRights24/07/23 11:40 PM
6

Correction - she is againat WOMEN being body shamed. Not just everyone. Just the new "better race" of vagina owners.
/r/MensRights24/07/23 11:39 PM
8

Found a feminist, lol. Misogyny is just women being upset over anything that they dont like at any given second. Misandry is standard female hate and double standards, directed at men.
/r/MensRights24/07/23 11:35 PM
5

Well, its a modern woman, aka empress of the universe and a better race, all in one - in her own mind, that is. I dont expect much if anything, nowadays, from them. Its pointless.
/r/MensRights24/07/23 11:32 PM
4

Am married, can confirm that.
/r/MensRights23/07/23 11:57 PM
9

Well, F them. They are adults, time to do their part in life, lol. No way in hell im supporting a parasite.
/r/MensRights20/07/23 08:45 PM
18

He's male. Of course he is not going to get any meaningfull support. Welcome to feminism. Where I live, he'd just be denied any support, and be directed to abuser's treatment hotline for being a male, because thats the procedure.
/r/MensRights18/07/23 08:07 AM
1

No. Thia would mean that a lying woman can win this situation. There must be no limit on prosecution. Alternativelly - mandatory dna testing at birth.
/r/MensRights17/07/23 06:07 AM
3

Oh, my dear, progress your rights all you want. Juat dont take anything, ever ,that men created or worked for. Simple as that. Nothing of what is ours, is for you.
/r/MensRights16/07/23 11:35 PM
2

Men created those institutions dor themselves and our own profit and our power, not for your mythical "society". Why would we share our work, risk, anyhting - what do you give in return? Is that something worth the same for us, by our standards? Because woemn whaaaaaant us to share? LOL.
/r/MensRights16/07/23 11:32 PM
3

If the mythical patriarchy was real, any and all female superiority movements would be steamrolled with army, right when they started. Yet they were not....;)
/r/MensRights16/07/23 11:22 PM
1

Correction - any and all support should only be on good will of presumed father - after all, his consent to be a father might have been revoked post factum. Like women do with sex, you know....
/r/MensRights16/07/23 11:17 PM
3

No draft, and no more societal pressure on men to serve and die for the country. Instead, for equality, women must be forced to so so - until female wqr vixtims count matches that of men. Additionally, only when said count matches should women have any politics-related rights at all. If she ia not willing to die for the nation, she is fundamentally unfit to decide about that nation.
/r/MensRights16/07/23 11:15 PM
6

And tens of hours monthly, of "unpaid emotional labour".
/r/MensRights16/07/23 10:44 PM
1

What holds up in court, depends on how law is written. Change the law, problem solved...
/r/MensRights16/07/23 11:07 AM
1

You mean, you dont belive the - male - victim? :V her being hurt is regretable, but ulitmatelly - oh, well. He had to defend himself after all.
/r/MensRights16/07/23 10:20 AM
6

Juve court for lying
/r/MensRights15/07/23 11:32 PM
-8

Meh, just treat false accusation as grounds for use of force in self-defence. Problem will cease happening, overnight.
/r/MensRights15/07/23 11:31 PM
3

...wait, so when it doesnt suit "real" women, transwomen are suddenly not real women? Or what? Gurls, make up your own f...ng mind, maybe?
/r/MensRights13/07/23 01:53 PM
4

You do realise that there is a difference between what you can do while single and when being in a relationship with someone, yes? In the latter case, you just DONT do some certain things.
/r/MensRights09/07/23 10:31 AM
4

Its not a threat. Its a statement of fact. We dont exist for you. And we dont need you. Women say they dont need men, yet they just have to take all those sweet money from the taxpayer...most of who, by amount paid vs taken, is men. Guess who builds and keeps the infrastructure running, or mining for that matter. Maybe women should try that, from scratch? Without taking whqt men built, discovered, and invented? ;) you sure you dont need us? Maybe we should stop running power plants for a day. Ho…
/r/MensRights07/07/23 11:10 PM
2

In other words, a woman thinking that she has a roght to generalise us, because of her issues. Neat, not. Gurl, your issues are not our thing for us to take care of, and we will not consent to you resolving your issues by doing what is deterimental to us - and no, no "compromises" - not good enough, not anymore, and not worth the hassle. We are no longer any sort of "team" and it was feminists that said that - we just said "ok" to that.
/r/MensRights07/07/23 10:03 PM
2

If they expect us to care for their issues, well...that requires reciprocation, dont you think? And they DO expect us to care. So.
/r/MensRights07/07/23 09:59 PM
21

Our empathy is not free anymore, preciselly because of feminists.
/r/MensRights01/07/23 06:53 PM
16

So, she wants to basically be a parasite, and then after their relationship ends, he is to upkeep said parasite? His moeny is not THEIRS, is HIS. If she wants to have some, ahe should go and work AND go around the kid. Just like he will be expected to, by her no less.
/r/MensRights01/07/23 06:53 PM
19

Doesnt matter. All forms of taking moeny and assets from men who worked for them - must end. What ours is for us alone. Women can go and work too.
/r/MensRights01/07/23 06:49 PM
3

So, we should just go by a womans WORD? LOL. How about no? Sorry, trusting is overrated.
/r/MensRights25/06/23 11:10 AM
2

Maybe, maybe not. If not tested, she is suspect by definition. Words are...fleeting, just like woman's ethics when it suits her enough.
/r/MensRights25/06/23 11:08 AM
2

No. Mandatory AND forced under threat of a criminal case against her should she object in any way. Why? Because a woman will do anything to manipulate her way out of this. We both know that to be true.
/r/MensRights25/06/23 11:07 AM
1

Nah, just cut her genitals off, then set her free. She obviously is fundamentally unable to use them properly without causing deliberate harm to others.
/r/MensRights25/06/23 11:04 AM
1

You can paternity test even before child being born, and this should be mandatory and forced - or a criminal sentencing for a woman should be done for possible fraud attempt.
/r/MensRights25/06/23 11:01 AM
0

Men dont exist to provide to women. She is to bring in just as much money and assets as we are, without fail. Alternativelly, she must have no right to what we worked for. We are not free income. We are people.
/r/MensRights25/06/23 10:59 AM
9

In a normal world, she'd be beaten into a pulp by a rule of law.
/r/MensRights25/06/23 10:51 AM
20

Probably a woman posting to one of those groups.
/r/MensRights25/06/23 10:49 AM
40

Of a group of people, yes. Singling out a person for the sake of, well, covert surveilance in this case? Where I live thats a criminal case.
/r/MensRights25/06/23 10:48 AM
2

Oh, to bo honest, russia has already lost this war on literally day three. After they failed to take the capital with first strike and ukrainian forces took out their specials. Afterwards, when the west started to send help, that was pretty much a matter of time, when rather than if. Russia didnt engage enough forces to take such a large nation state, because they simply dont have them. Not to emntion having actual military logistic capability for that.
/r/MensRights23/06/23 08:28 AM
9

Yep. Fuck russkies. But, tbh...the worst thing for russia would be, paradoxically, actually winning this war. Why? Because now they are against an army of Ukrainians that are armed, determined, and have much to loose. Should russians actually somehow manage to win (unlikely), then they will still have to manage an even larger, partisan army of ukrainians that are armed, determined, even more hating them russians, and have not much to loose anymore. And their border is a swiss cheese. And Ukraini…
/r/MensRights22/06/23 10:30 PM
40

Key words being "many", which is waaaay less than how many men are there, and "volunteering" when men MUST defend and sacrifice their life if needed. See the difference yet? If women are to be worthy of governing they must a) be forced to defend just as men are, and b) as many women lives must be sacrificed as men died through the history. Untill then, there is no real equality.
/r/MensRights22/06/23 10:06 PM
1

They should, same with all money he ever spent on the relationship.
/r/MensRights22/06/23 09:56 PM
1

No feminist women there to fight for women? Oh no...anyway.
/r/MensRights22/06/23 09:54 PM
3

For a woman, as a man, we are exactly that.
/r/MensRights22/06/23 09:52 PM
61

Women just ran away, but will come back for elections once war is over and rebuild complete - so they can say "vote for me, im teh viiictim and i have a vag! And I wanna be a ruler!". This is why women are not worthy of governing. They will not step up to fight.
/r/MensRights22/06/23 09:50 PM
2

So, local good feminists, any action from your end against this atrocity? Or just feels and empty words? XD
/r/MensRights22/06/23 09:48 PM
3

For a woman, truth is what suits her emotionally at the moment.
/r/MensRights21/06/23 11:29 PM
1

Naming oneself also has consequences. Thats one issue. Another is the fact that its still a woman, femaplaining men - instead of giving actual man a platform to talk.
/r/MensRights21/06/23 11:27 PM
3

You want us to belive, its on you to bring evidence to the table.
/r/MensRights21/06/23 05:21 AM
2

Giving someone a label ks NOT doing anything. Its an empty, worthless word. Push laws that criminalise thwt behavior, with aproprietly high (as in - cruel. Lenient law is a worthless law, you are to fear it) AND unavoidable penalties - then it is "doing something". If you do not work towards that, then for me, you are an enabler at best. Because, lets face it - feminists are ALL FOR that, when it comes to criminalising things like "manspreading" or "mansplaining".
/r/MensRights21/06/23 05:20 AM
1

Morally? No. Politically? If its good for a man, then its good...
/r/MensRights20/06/23 10:49 PM
1

Yeah, its nuts that women are allowed to gtfo instead of fighting. Especially when they would LOVE to be where Zelensky is right now...tho they would not be him, they'd be female Chamberlains.
/r/MensRights20/06/23 10:48 PM
2

Russian nation is just scum like that. Been like this for centuries. How do I know? Greetings from Poland. We had our share of russkies over the centuries. Now, we all here hope we'll have a xhance, after all, to burn them all.
/r/MensRights20/06/23 10:47 PM
1

We are born and bred to dominate. Why shouldnt we, if we achieve enough and put in apropriate work?
/r/MensRights20/06/23 10:32 PM
4

Then do something about your extremists, to weed them out. Then, we might talk if it suits us to do so. And if you want to be considered equal, put in equal work, and take on equal risk in equal fields, to same extent. Want to govern a nation? Build it from the fround up, like men once did. Because we didnt build them for you to tale and play with, you know?
/r/MensRights20/06/23 10:30 PM
8

You dont compromise with someone that claims men are rapists due to having a penis. So what if its extreme part of feminism, if the "good" feminism does nothing to weed it out? Seems like..enabling, you know?
/r/MensRights20/06/23 10:25 PM
4

Not "we". FEMINISTS did. This resulted in an irrecoverable loss of trust, THE hardest currency to get and keep. Words and actions you knowz tend to have consequences. And forgivness is utter debilism.
/r/MensRights20/06/23 10:24 PM
10

No such thing as unconditional love. Everyone has their limits.
/r/MensRights20/06/23 10:17 PM
3

Oh, but you DO contribute, by inaction. You allow it to perpetuate. You have literally NO issue with your extremists, all the while you DO act against me - calling out me on the same thing. Seems like a double standard :)
/r/MensRights20/06/23 07:34 AM
0

Still a feminost, therefore an enemy.of men.
/r/MensRights19/06/23 11:42 PM
4

In other words, you get a standard treatment, that men get from feminism. Welcome to diplomatic rule of equal response, i guess equality isnt something you really truly want ;)
/r/MensRights19/06/23 11:39 PM
4

What I mean - if you identify as a feminist, you are of hate, by definition - unless you can provide evidence of actuall achievement of tearing down feminist extremism. What do you not understand, exactly? Apart from not understandingz apparently, thwt men have a right not to belive or trust you, just because you formed some words? Word is worthless. If you want worth, provide verifiable evidence of your actions, that can be aproprietly judged. Then, if it suits me, I might belive you :) because…
/r/MensRights19/06/23 11:26 PM
7

"That is not feminism" stop lying, and if you want us to belive you - actually achieve something against your own extremists. If you do not, you are an enabler, and as such - same guilt should be placed on you. Why? Because you cannot guarantee amd cannot provide verifiable evidence, that you are not willing to enable them.
/r/MensRights19/06/23 11:15 PM
6

This is why capital punishment should be made public again.
/r/MensRights19/06/23 11:08 PM
14

...yeeeeah,thats pretty much called child abuse, where I live.
/r/MensRights16/06/23 10:12 PM
6

Yeah, Hera was fucked up jealous. BUT well, she did have her reasons, considering the amount of extramartial kids Zeus fucked into various earthly women while wearing fursuits...I mean while transformed into various animals. If my partner fucked around to THAT extent, id be jealous too...
/r/MensRights16/06/23 10:07 PM
1

Tbh, they are not entitled to being the only one, and they have jo right to dox people because of their feels. Commitment is a privilege for the best, not a right for just any.
/r/MensRights15/06/23 08:51 AM
2

...and yet its you being downvoted ;) but belive what you want. After all, you know better ;) We'll do what we think is best for us, no matter what you think.
/r/MensRights15/06/23 08:41 AM
2

"Why is there an issue with that" Because we say so. Empathy? Empathy has no value, brain chemistry cannot be verified, thus your claim can as well be a lie :)
/r/MensRights15/06/23 08:35 AM
14

In that guy's mind, he's different because he's trans. And he has real feelings, unlike those lower caste cis men. Scum.
/r/MensRights15/06/23 08:31 AM
2

We say that there is a problem. You just confirming being a part of it.
/r/MensRights15/06/23 08:25 AM
2

It was always a hate movement. From the white feathers, to Andrea Dvorkin, to Valerie Solanas. Nothing has changed, apart from words thrown at us.
/r/MensRights15/06/23 08:22 AM
4

We have a right to intervene if our rights, goals, needs, or expectations are under any attack. If thats a problem for you, then you are part of the problem.
/r/MensRights15/06/23 08:12 AM
5

Might be time to check your privilege, then.
/r/MensRights15/06/23 08:03 AM
2

Funny how being insecure is one of insults of choice..as if men, dunno, dont have a right to feel insecure for any reason? Or something...
/r/MensRights15/06/23 08:02 AM
1

Its a toxic type of "support", not real support. It can easily be seen by wording. Most likely a feminist wrote that, so understandable.
/r/MensRights15/06/23 07:02 AM
2

Lol, so what? Nothing to do with health. In fact, excessive makeup use on skin is often long-term deterimental to its condition. Yeah, you dont see an issue, that is obvious. People are talking about how suicide rates in men are treated, and here you are, talking cosmetics...
/r/MensRights15/06/23 07:00 AM
2

Fortunately, there' an ignore/block option :)
/r/MensRights12/06/23 04:17 PM
1

She is not part of group called "men". Only we can decide what is best for us, on our terms alone. If a woman has an issue, she knows where the doors are, because she isnt beneficial to our cause. Unless she will give us a right to decide about her ow group, called "women". Will she? No? Then what are we talking about, really, apart from her trying to use us for her own ends?
/r/MensRights12/06/23 04:07 PM
4

The issue being with you being FEMALE, and pushing your opinion on OUR lives, goals, and expectations. You have inherently no right to your opinion on how OUR matters should be, and about what is best for US. ​ "If you are not the type of guy to stalk women and pressure them into secluded places, or are violent, then you have nothing to worry about." aside from a lying woman, you mean? But hey, belive the victim, right? Nope. No verified evidence means you are a deliberate liar - if you dont lie…
/r/MensRights12/06/23 02:23 PM
5

"potentially" meaning, that there is a risk of false accusation. You seem not to have an issue with that crime. Why? Do you have no problem with someone's good name being destroyed, for life, because someone thought he's POTENTIALLY a bad guy? With no real response possible, not even talking about rebuilding said good name? Seems like you are into enabling feminist hate, and not our advocate at all. "Multiple women confirmed is enough." It is NOT enough. Woman will lie when/if it suits her enoug…
/r/MensRights12/06/23 02:18 PM
6

No. War is diplomacy by other means. The only issue is, that women are expected to have an inherent right to personal safety, when men are expected to risk their lives.
/r/MensRights12/06/23 12:29 PM
3

So? Three unverifiable smears too many, then.
/r/MensRights12/06/23 12:27 PM
5

or so they said. Which has zero value without verifiable, independent evidence.
/r/MensRights12/06/23 12:25 PM
3

this changes nothing, really.
/r/MensRights12/06/23 12:25 PM
4

She had a baby? And? Noone cares. Double standards are double standards and are not acceptable, no matter the situation. She is not some new "better race" just because of having a vag.
/r/MensRights11/06/23 07:43 PM
2

The very fact that you would need to ask and hear such comment is extremally disturbing, op.
/r/MensRights17/05/23 01:26 PM
2

You have no right to interfere with his genitals, unless there is a medical reason thwt cannot be resolved in any other way. If there is no such situation happening - then you are basically commiting a rape and mutilation against your child.
/r/MensRights17/05/23 01:23 PM
1

Stansard female psychology - vagina always good, male always bad trope.
/r/MensRights17/05/23 01:20 PM
3

Yeah, feminists made that stuff illegal. After all, vagina owners are a higher caste, and cannot be possibly not trusted by some mere male...and heavens forbid that male dares to verify her holy words /s
/r/MensRights17/05/23 01:18 PM
-2

Woman's side is not our concern. Our sole concern should be benefit of group called "men".
/r/MensRights17/05/23 01:15 PM
5

It needs to be forced by law, under criminal penalties if woman tries to avoid testing.
/r/MensRights17/05/23 01:14 PM
2

Deceptive? Oh noes, female would have feeeeeels... Noone cares. We have an inherent right to truth. If she gets hurt because of it, its perfectly acceptable.
/r/MensRights17/05/23 01:12 PM
1

If she refuses testing for whatever reason, its reason enough not to trust her, ever again. If she has nothing to hide, then she has no reason to have ayny problem with such testing.
/r/MensRights17/05/23 01:10 PM
2

I think its more in the lines of a DV victim turned abuser (as a result of being abused themselves). Whixh is indeed a thing...
/r/MensRights13/04/23 10:33 PM
3

Women started this with feminism. Welcome to a response, I guess? It hurts? Good. Thats the point.
/r/MensRights12/04/23 11:53 PM
6

Women refer to us as "males" as a norm. Welcome to equality, enjoy your stay...not.
/r/MensRights12/04/23 11:52 PM
3

Should get a noose.
/r/MensRights12/04/23 11:51 PM
6

Women doctors usually last a fraction of time in the workforce, compared to men. After all, teh baby rules anyway.
/r/MensRights12/04/23 11:46 PM
2

Doesnt matter what you belive. Extremists take a big steaming dump on your movement's good name. Its up to YOU to either a) clean it up, or b) face consequences of it. No such thing as "not taking something into account". Why? And why should that happen? Because its good to YOU? So? Its not good enough for me, by my standards. "Don't..." dont tell me what to do. You dont own me. "movement to equalise all genders" - seriously? Want us to belive that false statement? Start with mandatory front-lin…
/r/MensRights28/03/23 01:08 PM
2

The good feminists are just enablers of hate, that is coming from extremists of their movement. Just as guilty, if not more.
/r/MensRights28/03/23 01:34 AM
1

War is just means of diplomacy.
/r/MensRights28/03/23 01:26 AM
1

It is not pointless. Most worthless consumerism is female clothes, accesories, and makeup. They are also not exactlt environmentally feiendly businesses. Removing any female spendong would go a long way to reduce waste and emissions.
/r/MensRights28/03/23 01:25 AM
1

Well, seeing as men can get a better, more productive conversation from an AI chatbot than from a woman, well....maybe women should step up and be better at this? XD
/r/MensRights28/03/23 01:20 AM
0

Tradwife is just being a parasite.
/r/MensRights28/03/23 01:18 AM
22

She is a feminist. For them, men are perpetrators even if they are victims...
/r/MensRights28/03/23 01:15 AM
3

Double standards...so typical.
/r/MensRights12/03/23 05:21 PM
28

So, only difference from extreme MGTOWs is in the Fact thwt its women doing it - and as usual, now its a GOOD thing XD LOL.
/r/MensRights09/03/23 01:25 AM
1

Sure, if its just female taxpayer that pays for it, and only female employer/co-worker that is at a loss because of it.
/r/MensRights20/02/23 12:19 PM
2

Of course, its never women's problem. Unless they could benefit and its not happening - then it is their problem XD
/r/MensRights20/02/23 12:15 PM
2

Or just something like the Saiga repeating/automatic shotgun. There are quite many shotgun models with rather large magazines...
/r/MensRights20/02/23 12:07 PM
1

not exactly that simple, at least where I live - "advocato diaboli" is a thing. Its a matter of making sure that fair process stays fair, not just of defending someone from consequences. ​ But my country has codex law, not US-style precedent driven law. No idea how exactly all this works in the US.
/r/MensRights20/02/23 12:05 PM
1

"mommy knows best" - local feminists :V
/r/MensRights20/02/23 12:03 PM
1

ya, how dare we be born with penises! /s
/r/MensRights20/02/23 11:52 AM
5

So what? If its toxic, consequences must always come to them. Doesnt matter why they did it, only thing that matters is what it caused - or might have caused / might cause in the future - to us.
/r/MensRights17/01/23 01:20 PM
3

...because that woman is SOOO going to care, lol. Well, for money that I provide, yeah, she'll care for that, of course. Me? I'll be seen as a tool by her. F that noise, I can be single and happy.
/r/MensRights13/01/23 02:24 PM
1

If the conditions for noth groups are not the same, value provided is not the same. Again - she is not forced to serve and die like I am. She only has an option, and even then its a lighter duty. Thats not equal by definition. And then, there's the issue of all the historical inequality in this regard, that must, obviously, be taken into account.
/r/MensRights13/01/23 02:19 PM
1

We are not a team, and its you who wants something from me, not the other way around...so, yeah. Dont tell me what to do. You are not my queen. Nor my owner.
/r/MensRights13/01/23 02:16 PM
1

Indirectly, LOL. Nope. If she wants to rule and vote - she must bleed and die for the country. Otherwise, she must have no such right.
/r/MensRights13/01/23 02:14 PM
1

You are a woman. Take care of problems caused by your group, if you even want to talk with us about what you want. Then, we'll set you up a price to pay, and then we might talk.
/r/MensRights13/01/23 02:10 PM
1

Perhaps you fail to realise the difference between men being forced to, and women having an option to. Whatever they do willingly, is not even close to enough.
/r/MensRights13/01/23 02:08 PM
0

Russia? Borderline failed state, unless you are one of putin's top cronies. Venezuela? Already a failed state. Ukraine? At war that willl leave the country crippled for decades, if they - hopefully, if the western support holds - win against the russkie. ​ None of those are good to be in, for men.
/r/MensRights13/01/23 01:42 PM
1

found local woman / feminist.
/r/MensRights13/01/23 01:40 PM
1

Rumors? LOL, wake me up when there is verified evidence...untill then, he's clean for me.
/r/MensRights13/01/23 01:21 PM
1

Women are almost incapable of being an equal partner, more often than not.
/r/MensRights13/01/23 01:15 PM
1

They will not even be forced to "become a Russian". They will end up like Mariupol, or Bucha - raped, and dead. Russia has literal war crimes (like, indeed, rape), written down into their official war doctrine - for a reason. Its a tool of subjugation, for them. For them, its a war for survivial of their nation and country, and they know it.
/r/MensRights13/01/23 01:11 PM
1

For Ukrainians, loosing the war will end up in extermination. Russia did that to them a few times already, in the last century. They know what is on the line. Ukraine either wins this, or there will be neither any Ukraine to speak of, and no Ukrainian nation. And if they loose, then Lithuania, Latvia, and Estonia will be next, within few years.
/r/MensRights13/01/23 01:10 PM
1

Want me to fight? Then I expect total political control over said country, for MY social group, in return. She wants to rule the nation? Lets see if she is willing to defend it, first...
/r/MensRights13/01/23 01:08 PM
1

A sad norm over the centuries - women fucking around, when war comes around.
/r/MensRights13/01/23 01:07 PM
0

oh noes, woman lost her pet....meanwhile, men die by the thousands. But she is just entitled to safety, right? Priorities.
/r/MensRights13/01/23 01:03 PM
1

I WOULD force everyone into as much firearms training and strength/endurance training, and require everyone to arm themselves in their homes Found a civilian that has zero idea about how war works. Protip: meat for the grinder is what your "armed civvies" would become in a modern war. Even against russia. You dont win with personal firearms against mechanized army. This is not 14th century anymore. No, even if they get, somehow, to keep portable / squad-served ATGMs and MANPADs. You MUST have he…
/r/MensRights13/01/23 01:00 PM
2

"Legal and safe abortions so no woman has to be forced into motherhood of a baby she does not want." this might end up not beneficial to a man. If she is toxic, she can use that for toxicity against her partner.
/r/MensRights13/01/23 12:56 PM
1

Get women not to put their bags on seats, first. Universally. Then we can talk about if, if its good enough for men. What you dont get, is the fact that you dont get to define what "proper" is, unless you give us said right. We cant decide about women, thus you not get to have a say on how we behave, anymore. We only exist for ourselves, not for miss noone.
/r/MensRights13/01/23 12:49 PM
2

Why punish the many for the words and actions of the few? you mean like women love to push for punishing all men for actions of few?
/r/MensRights13/01/23 12:45 PM
1

because it doesnt matter. She wants full rights? Full obligations it is, then. If she fails to serve, then jail (or, in war, death penalty) it is. Just like it is for men, and was for millenia. Stop excusing lazy feminity.
/r/MensRights13/01/23 12:43 PM
1

No. Men hav been forced into war for thousands of years. It should now be switched to women, so that they bleed and die for us as much, as we did while defending their lazy asses. No but's or if's - only full equality of responsibilities.
/r/MensRights13/01/23 12:41 PM
1

female-only == anti-male, because men dont profit from it.
/r/MensRights13/01/23 12:38 PM
1

Its a feminist initiative. Its anti-male by definition alone. "without support"? Men are not there to "support" the kweeens. Go and fight, gurl. Or die when russians come, because men should NOT defend your lazy ass. If you die, you die. Welcome to reality, where noone cares about you - just as you dont care about men that fight.
/r/MensRights13/01/23 12:37 PM
1

feminist means anti-male by definition. Yes, we should fault them. For not being on the frontlines, like men are.
/r/MensRights13/01/23 12:35 PM
1

why are they not on the front line of combat, equally, like men are - you know - FORCED and OBLIGATED to? Where's your equality now, b**tch? Too equal for you? Yet you'd love to be a ruler of those men, no? To vote like they do, to get voted for like them...all with no obligation to die for the country, like they have.
/r/MensRights13/01/23 12:34 PM
1

men dont exist to fight for women's safety and comfort.
/r/MensRights13/01/23 12:32 PM
0

found a russian.
/r/MensRights13/01/23 12:29 PM
1

so, no equality in fighting for the country, and dying for it? Yet they will expect equality in ruling said country, right?
/r/MensRights13/01/23 12:29 PM
1

"what they can" is not enough. Either they go and die on the front lines, or they must have no voting rights. Beneficial for war effort is having boots on the grounds, and guns pointed towards enemy, not gurls playing home. Why? Because not one of them would ever be Zelensky.
/r/MensRights13/01/23 12:28 PM
2

Most women do not fight, and they are not obligated to fight, either - for them its an option. You seem not to see this issue. Men dont exist to die for women.
/r/MensRights13/01/23 12:26 PM
1

Women should go and fight just as men do - and this should be enforced and obligatory.
/r/MensRights13/01/23 12:25 PM
0

so? Not our problem to solve and deal with.
/r/MensRights13/01/23 12:11 PM
1

Its uncomfortable, but men are socialised from the toddler to just deal with such things as being uncomfortable. Which is part of universal female misandry. ​ You using "not all men" is a sign that you are part of the problem.
/r/MensRights13/01/23 12:08 PM
2

he isnt there for you.
/r/MensRights13/01/23 12:05 PM
1

You might not feel it, but if the inequality exists, then she still must face consequences for this being the case. No matter how good she is, she must do better. ​ Thats what women expect of us, after all - so we must do the same.
/r/MensRights13/01/23 12:03 PM
2

Of course you need to take into account that she actually has to travel outside of the comfort of her home to make money, but I'm sure you already did that. why, exactly, would that even count? Would she take that into account for him? I doubt it.
/r/MensRights13/01/23 12:02 PM
1

happy wife happy life Well, that proverb is about how, if she is unhappy, she will fuck up your life :)
/r/MensRights13/01/23 12:00 PM
2

the difference being, when women expect and nag us for it, its "what a man SHOULD DO", and when we expect anything, its "hate, misogyny and patriarchy".
/r/MensRights13/01/23 11:59 AM
2

at least didnt get the classic "what are you, GAY?!" spiel :D ...I pissed off even more when I said that im indeed, happy to be bisexual. I guess I pissed her off even more with that word.
/r/MensRights13/01/23 11:54 AM
1

well, should have choosen a career, then.
/r/MensRights13/01/23 11:44 AM
0

No such thing as "equal". Men must never be loosing anything in divorce. Its basic justice for us.
/r/MensRights13/01/23 11:43 AM
1

Nothing new, which is why women should not have any say in how sons are raised - under severe penalties. Its not good and not long-term profitable for our sons, more often than not.
/r/MensRights13/01/23 11:40 AM
2

Neither "average" nor a golddigger is suitable for any relationship.
/r/MensRights13/01/23 11:37 AM
1

What "wrong behavior" ? Testing for, and choosing only what is best for him?
/r/MensRights13/01/23 11:36 AM
-1

Why do you think he has no right to choose more over just one? Maybe she is just not good enough? Men dont exist to cater to her. We exist to take.
/r/MensRights13/01/23 11:34 AM
1

Women, in a nutshell, thinking they have right to our undivided attention because of brain chemistry.
/r/MensRights13/01/23 11:33 AM
1

"patriarchy", in practice.
/r/MensRights13/01/23 11:32 AM
2

Oh, I can be positive about her fat tissue - under the expectation that neither me, nor the taxpayer, will be paying for her cardiac treatments later down the line. ​ If she dies, she dies.
/r/MensRights13/01/23 11:30 AM
21

Want to vote? Cool, go die on the front lines in a war for few thousand years first. As an obligation under crimibal penalty, not as an option. Then we might talk about doing equal work for the society. Because sure as hell, im not dying for your little miss queen of the universe, if she doesnt provide me with Id expect in return for risking my life for her. Like men having total control over the political matters.
/r/MensRights03/01/23 12:35 AM
15

Want policing, call 911. Men are not her free private security force. Why would I ever risk my health, potentially life, and legal status, for her? What does she provide, nowadays, in return? Apart from worthless words/feelings? How's thst going to help me if im in jail/hospital/grave? Want me to "police" for her? If she is not my partner/daughter, too bad. Im not tearing my life down, I like to be safe too, you know. And we also have same right to our safety, as women do. If I dont prioritise m…
/r/MensRights03/01/23 12:32 AM
9

Reading 101. I said im expected to REACT to harrasment. Got it now? ;)
/r/MensRights03/01/23 12:12 AM
14

Tbh, its exactly what is expected of me as a man, nowadays. Which is why I expect exactly the same back. Im not holding my breath tho. No point.
/r/MensRights02/01/23 10:12 PM
27

If those were "extremists", then the "real feminists" should have done something about them. They did not, and as such - are enablers. At best. And silent perpetrators at worst. Just as bad in my book. And its not my business to upkeep their "good name". Its on THEM if they want to be trusted. I dont give much fucks, I dont exactly need to trust them, you know...in fact I dont need them at all in my life. Its that simple.
/r/MensRights02/01/23 08:53 PM
101

Yeah, its always the "buuut its diifferent" spiel, lol. Rules for thee, not for meeee. Feminity. In a nutshell.
/r/MensRights02/01/23 06:24 PM
-2

Cool. Shouldnt have forced Ukraine to give their nukes away to russkies, then, you know? Budapest Memorandum was also signed by the US of A as a guarantor of Ukraine's security and that includes their teritory. Now, are you willing to uphold what your nation signed, or are you as much of a traitors as you were in Jalta with stalin...? Maybe we should reconsider NATO, and just get our own nukes, hmm? What say you, "ally"?
/r/MensRights09/12/22 01:28 AM
-1

Volunteer isnt even remotely enough. Want to rule? Learn to bleed first.
/r/MensRights09/12/22 01:19 AM
5

Most of women left ukraine to western europe. We should push them back, and have them forced to fight just like men are forced. If they die, they die. Like men. Equally.
/r/MensRights09/12/22 01:16 AM
1

We dont care, as long as russkie scum die in droves.
/r/MensRights09/12/22 01:15 AM
0

They can stop the war at any secknd by leaving teritory of Ukrainre, murdering mr putin and his cronies, and paying for damages. It just takes will.
/r/MensRights09/12/22 01:11 AM
0

Only negotiation with russia should be happening through copious amount of warheads on their civilians. Its literally the only language russia understands. Sincerelly, eastern europe.
/r/MensRights09/12/22 01:10 AM
2

The times of a glorious king leading an army from the front ceased like 600 years ago.
/r/MensRights09/12/22 01:08 AM
1

Yeah, women ahould have no place on that cover. How many of them were forced to fight? Few do fight by their own chice but its not the same. Most just ran like cowards, yet they expect to have political power and right ro be a ruler...
/r/MensRights09/12/22 01:06 AM
1

Exactly. Isolate her from your social circle, op.
/r/MensRights09/12/22 12:59 AM
1

She might create drama and ruin their friendship. Why should he risk that for her? Especially seeing thst she already proven that this will happen, apparently...
/r/MensRights09/12/22 12:59 AM
3

Friends >>>>>> nephews.
/r/MensRights09/12/22 12:57 AM
9

If they respect us, we can talk. Currently, most women are either unwilling, or unable to do so.
/r/MensRights09/12/22 12:54 AM
5

Im 43 and im yet to meet a woman that didnt lie or manipulate in one way or another. Why should I think that women are not like that? Because someone said so? Kek. I'll do whats best, most efficient, and safest for me. If she has a problem with that, thats her problem to deal with, not mine.
/r/MensRights09/12/22 12:45 AM
3

Then its an ideology of hate. Not much different, really.
/r/MensRights09/12/22 12:42 AM
3

They get back what they started. Deal with it.
/r/MensRights09/12/22 12:40 AM
3

They are not? There is enough evidence to the contrary. Whay feminist say has zero value. Value is in what is the outcome of their actions. Outcome for us, that is.
/r/MensRights09/12/22 12:38 AM
8

Feminism is hate by definition. Go read your heroes, like Dvorkin, or Solanas, feminist. You are same by association to us.
/r/MensRights09/12/22 12:35 AM
2

It stands for what is best for us, by our decisiona. We are not on the same team. Dont like it? Too bad...?
/r/MensRights09/12/22 12:34 AM
1

Yep. But, what to expect, really?
/r/MensRights09/12/22 12:30 AM
1

She should rot in prison. As any crim.
/r/MensRights09/12/22 12:27 AM
5

Feminist response? Why ahould we ever care, even?
/r/MensRights09/12/22 12:19 AM
8

She is a criminal. And should be happy she didnt try to bring drugs i to pgillipines instead, shed be dead.
/r/MensRights09/12/22 12:17 AM
1

Isolation works wonders against you, gurl. Dialogue? Whats a "former" feminist? Or a "womanism", for that matter, btw?
/r/MensRights09/12/22 12:12 AM
1

Which is unfortunate. They dont being anything worthwile and profitable to us, anyway, most of the time. We should treat them like MRAs are treated on feminist subs. Equal response, and all...
/r/MensRights09/12/22 12:10 AM
-4

Thats what one gets if they accept and even tolerate drug use. Phillipines do it correctly, tbh.
/r/MensRights09/12/22 12:06 AM
7

Dont touch asses of underaged girls, problem solved. Not even if they say they consent to that (in fact, ESPECIALLY dont engage if they say they consent...). Its not exactly hard to not do that.
/r/MensRights05/12/22 03:06 PM
1

Acknowledging is not nearly good enough. Hopefully her BF pursues criminal charges, if ony just because.
/r/MensRights01/12/22 04:03 PM
1

So? No means no. End of story. If she pushes, she must pay for it in a criminal court of law.
/r/MensRights01/12/22 04:01 PM
1

Man's sexuality doesnt exist for women to use as they will. Dont excuse rapist females.
/r/MensRights01/12/22 04:00 PM
1

Problem being, most women dont think of men as "people", bu as "services".
/r/MensRights01/12/22 03:57 PM
1

A bit pushy? Do that to a woman, and you will get a rape case against you. Its not "a bit pushy". NO means NO, and that is the end of taking. He didnt consent, and yet she didnt stop. Therefore it IS a sexual assault.
/r/MensRights01/12/22 03:53 PM
1

Same. Good luck with tying one to the other if even MAC addresses differ...
/r/MensRights01/12/22 03:49 PM
1

Its not about fact and evidence. Its about her having FEEEEELINGS.
/r/MensRights01/12/22 03:44 PM
1

Tell that to putin. Ukraine didnt start this bs situation, russkie scum did, like they always do in our region.
/r/MensRights01/12/22 03:41 PM
1

...what "retirement"? XD
/r/MensRights01/12/22 03:36 PM
1

No such thing as "permanent" when there's a 155mm round coming.
/r/MensRights01/12/22 03:34 PM
1

Yep. Especially mobiks in the DNR army and so on. They literally pulled the worst stuff they had, to arm those masses. Also, ballistic vests with no ballistic defence capability, just cloth, lol. Welcome to russia.
/r/MensRights01/12/22 03:33 PM
4

So? This doesnt mean anything. Off to the frontlines, die like a man if you want to vote like said man. If you dont, dont expect to have same rights.
/r/MensRights01/12/22 03:31 PM
1

So? Not their teritory. What they claim has no value.
/r/MensRights01/12/22 03:30 PM
1

Dont take someone's else land, and you dont get killed...its simple.
/r/MensRights01/12/22 03:30 PM
5

Ukrainians know that its either this, or their nation ceasing to exist. Sincerelly, eastern european. We dont want russkie scum to govern us anymore. They murdered enough of us over last several centuries, you know? The real problem is, why are women able to choose if they want to join the fight? They should be as much forced to the frontlines as we men are. If they die, they die - welcome to equality...
/r/MensRights01/12/22 03:28 PM
1

A feminist, what to expect? XD
/r/MensRights01/12/22 03:23 PM
1

Just a feminist hero, aka a man hater. If you want more google miss Dvorkin and miss Solanas. Thsts real feminism for you.
/r/MensRights01/12/22 03:23 PM
1

Its still apropriating someone's cause for her own benefit.
/r/MensRights01/12/22 03:09 PM
2

Yep, if I had a choice to die or live with a feminist, I'll rather die.
/r/MensRights01/12/22 03:06 PM
2

Women should stop telling men what men "should do", thats for starters. They have no right to opinion on the matter.
/r/MensRights01/12/22 03:03 PM
1

Its not about women. She is apropriating our fight for her own selfish benefit.
/r/MensRights01/12/22 03:01 PM
1

If the reason for help is toxic, accepting said help will turn out deterimental to you, especially long term. Dont accept poisoned chalices, no matter how thirsty you are.
/r/MensRights01/12/22 03:00 PM
-1

She isnt entitled to any favours from us.
/r/MensRights01/12/22 02:39 PM
13

Yeah, why should they benefit from work they didnt even perform?
/r/MensRights01/12/22 02:39 PM
0

No. Only option should be forced testing, with the woman being sterilised as criminal pu ishment, if the results show that she lied. We are talking abojt preventing quite serious crime, after all, thus penalty must obviously be cruel and extreme. Fear ensures crims dont happen too often, and punishment ensures culling.
/r/MensRights08/11/22 02:45 AM
1

Of she pushes against it, she is already potentiwlly guilty, and thus should pay for it.
/r/MensRights08/11/22 02:41 AM
1

Just redirect some funding from worthless feminist organisations, and worthless social support payouts for women. Problem solved.
/r/MensRights08/11/22 02:40 AM
1

If she asked something inapropriate, then she should already be metoo'ed and destroyed. Why? Because a man would end up exactly like that.
/r/MensRights08/11/22 02:36 AM
2

Woman. She is of age, so not a girl anymore. And you sound like an encious 30+ gurl now :V
/r/MensRights08/11/22 02:35 AM
3

So? Still has to pay for any fuckups, the harsher the better she learns not to try to fuck men over...
/r/MensRights08/11/22 02:31 AM
2

Time to change AoC laws, then? Otherwise, f off. If she is legal age and interested, im not passing an opportunity, because why should I, exactly? Anything "after" isnt my concern, there will not be a second time, obviously, since she iant compatible enough for more.
/r/MensRights08/11/22 02:28 AM
0

Caregiving is one thing. Are you a man? If not - you are talking where you only should be listening and giving platform to men to talk about THEIR issues, and this is already a form of hate. Our issues are there to solve, not for women to masturbate their emotions over them. Which is a sad norm in this society.
/r/MensRights08/11/22 02:23 AM
2

Chivalry should not be promoted, its a form of hate against men, it doesnt bring anything positive for men and only promotes benefit for a woman, really. If only remotelly, or as an idea - unacceptable. Also, nothing wrong with liking sex and wanting much of it. If she cant keep up, she is just not good enough.
/r/MensRights08/11/22 02:14 AM
2

Thats a given. Woman only gives any shit when and if it currently suita her to do so. We should obviously respond equally, instead of morally.
/r/MensRights08/11/22 02:03 AM
2

Quite a perverted emotionality to think and feel like that, even short term/fantasy breeds potential issues.
/r/MensRights08/11/22 02:00 AM
2

Which is not good enough. Amber's life should be forfeit to the executioner, as a minimum.
/r/MensRights08/11/22 01:53 AM
-1

Faor, maybe. Good by our standards and expectations? Remains to be seen...
/r/MensRights08/11/22 01:52 AM
3

If a guy tells a feminist that he was abused, she will celebrate. And doubly so, if the perpetrator was a woman.
/r/MensRights08/11/22 01:40 AM
1

Why do you expect us to be fair to you, when you are not fair towards us? Why do you expect us to give you anything without first paying our price? We dont exist for you, and we are not a team.
/r/MensRights08/11/22 01:39 AM
2

Whe she is too lazy XD
/r/MensRights25/10/22 02:18 AM
1

As a woman, you are inherently guiltt of being part of the problem. Apologies have zero value.
/r/MensRights25/10/22 02:13 AM
1

He should do what is good for him. If he doesnt fight for his own good, then noone will.
/r/MensRights25/10/22 02:07 AM
1

Thats one seriously fucked up woman. She literally denies herself to her first child.
/r/MensRights25/10/22 02:03 AM
4

Opening dor for one. Apparently, im also misogynostic for NOT doing this for the same one. Meh. Juat another woman, looking for a reason to be toxic. Usual feminity, in a nutshell.
/r/MensRights25/10/22 01:45 AM
-3

It has everything to so with them. Its about female entitlement to being an interference.
/r/MensRights25/10/22 01:43 AM
-2

Doesnt matter what she was trying to do. What matters is, she fucked up and choose to be an unwanted interference in someone's private life.
/r/MensRights25/10/22 01:42 AM
1

Oh look, a feminist troll.
/r/MensRights25/10/22 01:03 AM
1

Also, doesnt mean you will not get punished for it by her.
/r/MensRights25/10/22 12:24 AM
5

Meh, another worthless superhero movie spinoff.
/r/MensRights25/10/22 12:19 AM
1

My life isnt your business, and you dont get to have such personal information.
/r/MensRights19/10/22 01:00 PM
1

Ya, only when a man is a tool for glorious wife, only then he is "fit" ;) after all, she knows best /s
/r/MensRights19/10/22 12:53 PM
1

...but you do realise, that its not just about me, but about other men that could be adversly affected? You do, right? Because you seem to think that it must be my own interest, or something. Self-sacrificed? No man exists to sacrifice himself, and especially not because someone expects that of him, with nothing in return.
/r/MensRights19/10/22 12:51 PM
1

Yet true.
/r/MensRights19/10/22 12:31 PM
1

Its not our problem if its damaging to girls. Its an issue for the feminism to solve. If they try to fix it in a way that is destructive to us, we should, by all means, oppose - thats what they are doing, usually, so I dont see any reaspn not to act alike towards them.
/r/MensRights19/10/22 12:30 PM
1

So, you expect her to still live on ex-partners expense, just because she was leeching his money? Or maybe daddy taxpayer should just give her money? Money that men work for, are just to be ...taken, so that a woman can have her "dynamic" aka free money? Cute. You expect us to be payment machines. How about no? Stay-at-home-parent is a parasitic relationship. She doesnt provide everything she should be justly expected to. Thus, this should be a punishable situation, not an encouraged one. What y…
/r/MensRights19/10/22 12:28 PM
1

If legal proces enables leeching, it must be changedz easy as that. And women can be expected to work properly - just as men are expected to. They HAD a dynamic, as you have stated. HAD. This dynamic ceased to exist. Why should men be on the sjort end of a stick? To be "noble"? We owe nothing to noone, apart from ourselves, at this point. And she is entitled to nothing from us, after the divorce takes place. NOW she is looking for a job? She should be expected to have a job, just as any man is e…
/r/MensRights19/10/22 10:22 AM
1

...because, apparently, "being a man" means being a self-sacrificing social group. Great deal for us, truly great /s
/r/MensRights19/10/22 10:15 AM
1

Men are treated with no leniency. I see no reason not to treat women equally. Again - we men are EXPECTED to do ALL and EVERYTHING. Thus, we should expect the same from women. Do you have a problem with that? Docyou support one-sided, exploatative style of relationships? Seems you do. Men do not exist for women to profit from, for free. Time for marriage laws to reflect that fact.
/r/MensRights19/10/22 09:21 AM
1

Any verifiable evidence?
/r/MensRights19/10/22 06:54 AM
1

She cant find a career NOW? Lol, she is to be expected to raise kids AND have a career AND take time to do her part at home chores. Just. As. Men. Are. EXPECTED. To do. No buts, no ifs. No mercy, or leniency. She wants equality? Here we go. Equal treatment.
/r/MensRights19/10/22 06:46 AM
1

If she doesnt want to loose a financial lifeline, she should, as an adult, you know.....have a career. Instead of being a leech. You know, like men are expected to have, without fail. If she does not, she isnt good enough ti be anyone's partner. Why would men be ok with being forcrd to upkeep someone, just so that someone can continue to be a parasite on them? Our money are only for ourselves. "Together" ended with the feminism.
/r/MensRights19/10/22 06:44 AM
10

Is that so? You know, its about trust. Which cannot exist if she openly states that she is a member of hate-based ideology that feminism is.
/r/MensRights19/10/22 12:06 AM
7

She is a feminist? Then she is guilty by association. Bad enough.
/r/MensRights19/10/22 12:00 AM
11

She cannot be trusted to put boys good as a priority. That has everything to do with everything. Chances are, she will prioritise a woman no matter the consequences.
/r/MensRights18/10/22 11:59 PM
2

Also, look at backslash men get, and consequences we have, if we are actually good. Not much different, often worse. But you do you.
/r/MensRights10/10/22 02:45 PM
1

The question is, whats best for us, tho. By being better, we woll never gain anything, anyway. And feminist way is shown to be quite effective...I mean, just look at society 50 years ago vs now, quite a change, isnt it? I like to be effective in what I do.
/r/MensRights10/10/22 02:36 PM
-5

So, you say its an...equal response, I guess? What goes around - comes back around.
/r/MensRights10/10/22 01:53 PM
2

Well, she clearly thinks she is a modern ubermensh, so...
/r/MensRights10/10/22 01:43 PM
1

I sure as hell dont see it with my female employees and work associates, lmao.
/r/MensRights10/10/22 01:29 PM
1

No. We should stand for ourselves and our group, first and foremost. If it means being against women, its an unfortunate, but acceptable collateral damage.
/r/MensRights10/10/22 01:27 PM
7

Nope. Its just that empowerment brings out the real person.
/r/MensRights10/10/22 01:26 PM
5

Until it suits her otherwise.
/r/MensRights10/10/22 01:23 PM
22

True, but for them, men are not persons - just tools.
/r/MensRights15/09/22 10:34 PM
31

For hilary, men are just tools. Typical female privileged behavior, of treating others like devices for her own good.
/r/MensRights15/09/22 10:33 PM
4

so basically, like what feminists are trying to charge men with? Ya, should work BOTH ways, dont you think?
/r/MensRights14/09/22 07:44 AM
0

No. The issue is her inherently hatefull, misandrist thinking about men. And yes, if its good for our group, we should be prosecuting emotoonal pain, especially since its a main way women love to use against men. Emotional DV is still counted as DV, at least here where I live. I see no reason not to extend a few definitions to suit us - just like feminists did. And if women double down on hate and negativity, it just shows true colours.
/r/MensRights13/09/22 10:53 PM
1

Easy. Classify it as on same level as a violent ohysical threat to one's wellbeing /life, and enable men to use apropriate level of physical force to end the threat. Up to and including use of a lethal weapon, of course. For evidence, we should of course, belive the male victim... Problem of female-on-male-violence will cease to exist, day one.
/r/MensRights13/09/22 10:42 PM
-1

Proper criminal penalties could just include causing emotional pain, as well. All it takes is proper criminal legal system in place, and proper enforcement organisation. Your way doesnt do anything apart from providing easy way to employ plausible deniability of her hate.
/r/MensRights13/09/22 10:40 PM
9

Statiatics say otherwise, liar. Real ones, not feminist ones.
/r/MensRights13/09/22 10:34 PM
1

Your problem here is, you think we are a team with women. We are NOT a team. We only exist on same teritory. We owe them nothing, and we should care for ourselves first and foremost. If we dont do it, noone will - and sure as F, not said women.
/r/MensRights13/09/22 10:30 PM
1

If she asseses all men to be potential criminals, its hate and misandry. Criminal charges should be due. Why she did that, doesnt matter. Only thing that matters that her hate must be punished as harshly as it takes for her to never do it again.
/r/MensRights13/09/22 10:27 PM
8

Their framing doesnt matter. If they generalise us, they must be forced to a) apologise and b) pay for it. Her feels are not our issue, nor our problem. Her misandry and hate, is.
/r/MensRights13/09/22 10:25 PM
2

Financially, yes, thay man might not be able to support more than one child. So, in effect, he cant have his own biological child, potentially. Becauee of her lie. Or would you have him have another kid, and not be able to give that kkd a good future? That would not be a great idea, right? So, yeah. He might be put in a very problematic / suboptimal situation. Why should that be like that? Because her kid is suddenly more important than his real child? Its MOTHERs fault that this child loses a p…
/r/MensRights05/09/22 11:07 PM
-7

8 years, so...what? Means nothing. Implication is simple - if you even once supported feminism, in anything - or if you, even indirectly, benefited from it - you are an enemy, forever. No matter what, its just easier for us, and safer, to assume that :) for our own benefit. Consewuences against whole groups just...work, you know? Which is the only thing that should ever matter to us, now. Ourselves, and our good, our benefit.
/r/MensRights04/09/22 11:29 PM
1

She has no right to ever expect anything from a man, no matter the circumstances, or situation. What belongs to us, must always be under out total control. She can go and work, if she wants to have money. If she cannot, too bad but not our problem. If she cannot upkeep the child to an acceptable atatus, it must be taken from her.
/r/MensRights04/09/22 11:26 PM
-3

Its his money and his assets. Only his, as he worked for it. She should have no right to even be informed on the matter, unless it suits him at any given moment. Anything else, and we should call it prostitution, not a relationship.
/r/MensRights04/09/22 11:22 PM
-7

If you were a part of the problem, there is no "fixing that". Its a matter of trust, you see. Its just easier to treat you as a wildcard / enemy, anyway. After all, why would you think that you are worth taking any needless risk?
/r/MensRights04/09/22 11:20 PM
4

You dont get to tell me what to do.
/r/MensRights04/09/22 11:16 PM
-15

Aka "oh look, another "im not like others" girl". You are part of the problem, by definition.
/r/MensRights04/09/22 11:15 PM
0

We dont need reassurance. Women have already given us enough proof of that, all through our lives.
/r/MensRights04/09/22 11:11 PM
3

Thats what happens if you have all upbringing done by mostly women, with solely female-centric narrative.
/r/MensRights04/09/22 11:00 PM
3

When a woman writes a law, she will make sure that it never harma another woman, no matter what she did. Group bias uber alles, cat hurt the holy sisterhood. Justice? Whats that?
/r/MensRights04/09/22 10:59 PM
1

Lmao If she wants me to be emotionally available, she has to do actual work to get that privilege. And then even more actual work to keep it. And has not to fuck it up, ever - this incljdes her interactions with 3rd parties. Most are just unable to be good enough to get thst privilege, much less keep it.
/r/MensRights04/09/22 10:51 PM
2

If they dont want to communicate, its their problem to fix. They should "address it", not us.
/r/MensRights04/09/22 10:41 PM
1

Meh, at thos current climate around sex, im not going to do anything thwt could even remotely be constructed as anything than pure consensual perfect vanilla sex. Safeword's are all nice, but the court of law will not care abput it, anyway.
/r/MensRights04/09/22 10:37 PM
20

Yeah, if someone gets murdered, they dont remember their own murder, either...by that logic, nothing wrong happened.
/r/MensRights02/09/22 09:08 AM
6

Unless you mind control the society, that will not happen. Utopias only exist in fantasy.
/r/MensRights02/09/22 09:07 AM
2

Imagine the result for that man, that didnt get to be really a father of their real child, and another man that ciuld not be a father, even when he was a biological parent. You want to sacrifice them. Are men some sort of societal tool for you? We are an absolute priority for ourselves. And no other.
/r/MensRights02/09/22 09:01 AM
6

I dont think you understand how reality works.
/r/MensRights02/09/22 08:56 AM
1

What men created - men owned. Justice.
/r/MensRights02/09/22 08:55 AM
4

Outcomes for whom?
/r/MensRights02/09/22 08:54 AM
2

That man also did nothing, and not cutting himself off, he doesnt get a chance of having a biological child. Or has WAY less chance. Why should HE be forced to sacrifice that? Mother is at fault, SHE is to resolve all that, without fail. If she does not, or cannot - even more punishment must be due for her. The rest is not OUR problem, at thia point.
/r/MensRights02/09/22 08:45 AM
2

Such defence is a norm in any female circle lf besties. Its a "you go gurl, score and slay!", more often than not.
/r/MensRights01/09/22 04:08 PM
1

She might want to love us, but her underlying reason for love, will always be selfishness.
/r/MensRights01/09/22 04:03 PM
1

Lol. What world do you live in, child?
/r/MensRights01/09/22 03:05 PM
2

So? We are not talking about women. Dont derail, maybe? If women have issues, they are welcome...to handle them, by themselves, without pushing into OUR teritory, OUR money, or OUR assets.
/r/MensRights01/09/22 03:04 PM
1

It might be virtous, but is profitable to us at any given moment?
/r/MensRights01/09/22 02:58 PM
1

A female cannot be a MRA, anyway. Too much of a chance of trying to push your agenda and your benefit into our goals, sorry. You will expect a worthless compromise at some point or another, which is a very serious issue.
/r/MensRights01/09/22 02:50 PM
1

Ya, you just erased gay men, lmao.
/r/MensRights01/09/22 02:48 PM
1

because women need to be protected no matter what you may think or want. they can go and protect themselves, tyvm. They have not that much to offer in return. We must prioritise ourselves and our own good - otherwise noone will do that.
/r/MensRights01/09/22 02:45 PM
0

Im a man. Being lonely in current society is a given, and a norm. We are treated as tools, not persons, and tools have no right to feel lonely, after all. I'll manage. Im good at this.
/r/MensRights01/09/22 02:03 PM
1

Feminists are already raging against artificial wombs, specyfically because it would provide a way for men to have child without woman being involved in total control of the process.
/r/MensRights01/09/22 01:34 PM
2

wait, so feminism, after all, is not for men? At least thats what they claim...would they be lying? All the more reason for a strict, forced paternity testing, id say. "Uhm, I think you'll find a lot of varied definitions. " yeah, the definition changes when its profitable to feminism. Neat. Not really trustworthy, more than just a bit self-serving. But neat, indeed.
/r/MensRights01/09/22 01:09 PM
2

There's always a potential, and it is enough. We want total, absolute certainty, and her word is spoken to be broken.
/r/MensRights01/09/22 01:05 PM
2

If a lie comes to light, no free money for her anymore. And no male servant for her, too. Thats her only concern. As always.
/r/MensRights01/09/22 01:05 PM
1

Dont excuse liars. If she's clean, she has no reason to have any problem with that. ​ IF.
/r/MensRights01/09/22 01:03 PM
1

Of course we SHOULD leave. Not leaving means, in this case, not having my own biological children. ​ Why should I be forced to sacrifice like that, because of her lies? To be "Better"? Fuck off with that. She must pay. If its by seeing pain of HER child as a consequence of HER actions - so be it.
/r/MensRights01/09/22 01:02 PM
1

Yeah, its grossly u nfair to their kids, to withold real information to them - as in, not giving them any chance of knowing their REAL father. Im sure that is waht you meant, right?
/r/MensRights01/09/22 12:56 PM
2

And her, lying to me, AND that kid, isnt cruel in the slightest, right?
/r/MensRights01/09/22 12:55 PM
1

SO, I guess women should not have a right to contest if their kids are switched in a hospital, then? ​ After all, its just genes...
/r/MensRights01/09/22 12:32 PM
2

If its not his kid, then its not his kid. The rest is semantics and societal pressure on a real victim - that being the man, potentially robbed of a chance to have his own child. ​ That kid can go thank his/her mom, the real perpetrator of abuse that happened here, which the rest of the story, is just consequences of.
/r/MensRights01/09/22 12:31 PM
1

If I doubt, I have a REASON. She should not have given me the reason to doubt. If she didnt fuck me over, she has nothing to fear. ​ I expect to KNOW, not to "be assured by her, who is in a direct conflict of interest".
/r/MensRights01/09/22 12:18 PM
1

gotta EARN that trust, then WORK not to have it retracted. She didnt, apparently.
/r/MensRights01/09/22 12:16 PM
5

Tests cost money. Who's going to pay for it. Women. Its in their own interest to PROVE paternity.
/r/MensRights01/09/22 12:13 PM
1

Paternity testing should be obligatory, with a proper criminal penalties for a woman that tries to dodge - like forced abortion.
/r/MensRights01/09/22 12:12 PM
1

You have to side with me, I have a vagina ... "and a gun!"
/r/MensRights01/09/22 12:07 PM
1

Well, I do wonder what did happen that caused him to behave like that? ​ Did she pull his strings, perhaps? Its a feminine thing to do, after all.
/r/MensRights01/09/22 12:06 PM
1

oh my sweet summer child...
/r/MensRights01/09/22 12:00 PM
1

and it is still MAN's fault! lmao
/r/MensRights01/09/22 11:49 AM
10

Woman should be the one deciding, BUT man's money and assets must be 100% safe from effects of her unilateral decision.
/r/MensRights01/09/22 11:43 AM
2

Politics is not about being better. Its about getting what we want and need. Its about being effective.
/r/MensRights01/09/22 11:33 AM
4

Life experience. If women can base everything on that, so can we.
/r/MensRights01/09/22 11:28 AM
2

Woman: men are abusers against animals Here in poland, meanwhile, we just had a female tiktok animal enthusiast/activist have her doggos removed from her custody by police. Why? Because she was fucking said doggos...
/r/MensRights01/09/22 10:44 AM
1

well, its TwoXChromosomes, what do you expect? :V
/r/MensRights01/09/22 10:42 AM
1

Same. Its enough that we have to cater to their feels and moods in peace time. I cant imagine having that BS in a fireteam, and having her cover my back, with a live weapon, later on.
/r/MensRights01/09/22 10:42 AM
4

Women are so badass, they were running away for most of the history of human kind. ​ Now, we should start forcing you to fight, to even the numbers. Maybe you'd start value real peace and quiet, once you bleed enough in a war zone. Meanwhile, we men will sit back with the kids, and have warm thoughs and feels towards you :V
/r/MensRights01/09/22 10:39 AM
3

War-time conscription of men is still in law, so...lol. No difference.
/r/MensRights01/09/22 10:37 AM
1

Well, germany is now so pacifist, that even their military is totally combat ineffective.
/r/MensRights01/09/22 10:36 AM
3

Why would we want something that is not good for us? We dont exist to die for others.
/r/MensRights01/09/22 10:33 AM
4

We get nothing. Which is exactly the reason why we should give them nothing. Especially protection. They can go wage wars too. They'll have glorious time.
/r/MensRights01/09/22 10:31 AM
3

Nope. What women should do, is f.. off from us, because only we can set our own standards. Women must not have a right to define a group that is inherently not their own.
/r/MensRights01/09/22 10:26 AM
1

masculinity, by sheer definition, is never toxic. If its toxic, it is not masculinity. Of course, we are talking about it not being toxic to a man in question. And only to him, since masculinity is for men, and only for them.
/r/MensRights01/09/22 10:22 AM
3

basic feminity :)
/r/MensRights01/09/22 09:50 AM
1

Mej, its not feminism. For a woman, everything, always, is an excuse.
/r/MensRights01/09/22 09:49 AM
1

Cute. Now lets see how much of rape there is, compared to normal, consensual sex. Yet you get it...its penalised, for good reason, no? By your logic, why? Its rare, no? Its surely just stories.. /s is obvious in case you get the wrong idea. We must push for laws that suit us, first and foremost.
/r/MensRights27/08/22 10:45 PM
1

Even if this happens to a aingle man in history, ot must be taken into account. For our own good, which should be our highest and only priority.
/r/MensRights27/08/22 10:43 PM
1

They just belive the victim, and fact checking be damned XD
/r/MensRights27/08/22 11:33 AM
1

Lol. We just want assurance of peace and quiet in our life, not female-spawned drama for her gain, on our expense. Its a fact that female morality stops where her gain begins.
/r/MensRights27/08/22 11:32 AM
1

No. There must be a proof of actual rape happening. Not an empty female word. Worss are spoken to be broken, and female words, doubly so. And court of public opinion is WAY more than enough to destroy someone's life, forever. You seem not to have a problem with that...maube you are female, that would profit from thst scheme?
/r/MensRights27/08/22 11:30 AM
1

Lol, this means nothing if she can just change her mind later. And she can.
/r/MensRights27/08/22 11:29 AM
5

But only for women, so that men dont rape all thos poor robots, lmao
/r/MensRights27/08/22 11:27 AM
4

Still manbashing. Sad.
/r/MensRights27/08/22 11:22 AM
2

Oh, but we men do contribute. Question is, why women do not contribute equally, in the numbers? Yet expect to be given? What do we get in return, really, from them? We as we men that pay for all that. And, well, something tangible and real, not her feels in return?
/r/MensRights25/08/22 06:18 PM
1

If I am to take care of kids, AND have a career, AND do chores at home AND everything else, so can she. I will NOT accept any kind of double standards, sorry not sorry. And, I can always ADOPT as a single parent, at least where I live. Or go one country over and get a surrogate. So, you know...men do have options. And its not like men MUST have a partner, you know? And even if, we should only have them in our life on our terms. If she doesnt like the terms, tbh i'll be as happy and fulfilled as …
/r/MensRights25/08/22 06:15 PM
4

Why should men pay taxes that dont benefit them? Woemn can go fund their programs, themselves.
/r/MensRights25/08/22 11:34 AM
7

Men dont exist to be tools. What we earn is ours alone.
/r/MensRights25/08/22 11:32 AM
6

Because men a) are just better at work, most of the time, one way or another, and b) men dont get a choice of NOT being a breadwinner while also being a part of family. If the try to choose, they are removed from said family, by the woman.
/r/MensRights25/08/22 11:29 AM
5

So, 70% of budget should be only for men. Its basic justice...
/r/MensRights25/08/22 11:26 AM
2

Fuck off. Even if a single accusatikn is false, its NOT ACCEPTABLE. We will NOT consent, ever, to sacrificing us, in any extent, shape, or form, so that women can have their easy way. We dont exist for them.
/r/MensRights24/08/22 07:51 AM
1

If the crime was not confirmed, it IS a false accusation. Otherwise you are disposing with "innocent unless PROVEN guilty". Its not "said to be guilty" for good reasons. I do get it. Women LOVE pushing courts of public oponion instead of actual LAW based judiciary system. Its oh so convinient when you can destroy people with a word, and with no consequences, most of the time. Whats not to like? Word is easily spoken to be broken, thus evidence should be only thing belived in court. And its not l…
/r/MensRights24/08/22 07:48 AM
6

What "more effort"? Each of them must be prosecuted with same effort. As any crime. Especiwlly considering thst a false accusation is NOT ONLY a crime against an accused. Its primarily a crime against the justice system itself, literally using it as a weapon against someone must not be tolerated.
/r/MensRights23/08/22 01:28 PM
6

If its a proven crime, yes.
/r/MensRights23/08/22 12:38 PM
1

If she wants to decide politically about the country, she is to defend said country. Its just fair.
/r/MensRights23/08/22 10:16 AM
18

because she wants to be a soldier, not to go to war :V For her, being a soldier is playing toys. ​ The rest, is for big bad patriarchy to solve, for women to profit :V
/r/MensRights23/08/22 10:15 AM
6

So? Her actions and words have tangible consequences for the accused. She MUST pay for damage she caused.
/r/MensRights23/08/22 09:54 AM
4

If there's a crime, there's an evidence. it just takes will to provide it. IF she lied, she must pay. Doesnt matter if it was malicious or not - it still had consequences for the accused person. If you forgive, you are same as that false accuser.
/r/MensRights23/08/22 09:53 AM
16

So, they outed false accusers / liars? Good. Those people shouldnt feel safe from being sued back, for example.
/r/MensRights23/08/22 09:51 AM
1

Meh. War crimes are just a definition, depending on who a) writes the history, and b) even knows that it happened and what it was, exactly. We shouldnt be above i.e. false flag operations.
/r/MensRights22/08/22 01:31 PM
-6

So we should take risks? Not worth it, imo.
/r/MensRights22/08/22 12:00 PM
2

As a polish citizen - instead of draft, we should be pushing towards massing of precision weaponry, and towards strategic weapon systems - radiological, chemical, nuclear if need be. With both overt and covert means of delivery. ​ Only safety is in capability to exterminate massive quantities of invader's civilians. If you are peacefull and belive in treaties - well, just look at Ukraine.
/r/MensRights22/08/22 11:37 AM
2

yeah, its a social/nationalistic, religious extremist cleptocracy right now here. Republic of Poland is no longer a democracy, nor a republic at this point.
/r/MensRights22/08/22 11:34 AM
1

google for works of one Andrea Dvorkin, or for Valerie Solanas. The real feminism.
/r/MensRights22/08/22 11:28 AM
-24

So, the one that manipulated men into thinking they have a male friend, so that they open up and she can use that for her own financial/work benefit - is dead? Because that's what she did, iirc. We shouldnt venerate such misandry. Means matter as much as the end result, right?
/r/MensRights22/08/22 11:23 AM
21

"Noone. First come, first serve, miss nobody".
/r/MensRights22/08/22 11:21 AM
-10

""There are many women working hard in the men's (rights) movement." problem being, they are WOMEN that try to decide about MEN. Who exactly gave them such right to decide on something inerently not theirs?
/r/MensRights22/08/22 11:16 AM
12

her not being a feminist doesnt mean she is worth to be an ally of.
/r/MensRights22/08/22 11:12 AM
11

Never be her ally. She is a grown up big gurl, she can handle her own affairs. If she fails, too bad - but oh well.
/r/MensRights22/08/22 11:11 AM
3

Therefore, it seems 99% are false accusations - otherwise there would be a conviction. Were those women prosecuted for their lies? Apparently not.
/r/MensRights22/08/22 11:09 AM
9

This sub has way too many women and feminist trolls to be considered even remotely a safe space.
/r/MensRights22/08/22 11:07 AM
3

Of course you can. Especially in current climate, where facebook views and likes are literally a life of many women. Or people in general, for that matter. ​ Validation, sense of belonging to a group...its all something CRAVED by people nowadays, and women especially.
/r/MensRights22/08/22 11:02 AM
3

If you dont know anything you could monetize and live off of, well...
/r/MensRights17/08/22 02:17 PM
4

Typical female "you exist for me". You just stated that men are tools for you. Such respect LOL. You dont know what love even is. But again, what to expect?
/r/MensRights16/08/22 05:45 AM
4

You will not be a judge of your own case. If its good for us at any given moment, you are an enemy.
/r/MensRights16/08/22 12:40 AM
6

Again - no penis, no right to opinion on matters that are inherently not yours. Unless you give us right to decide on your uterus? Whats that? You dont? Then, well,...goes both ways. We dont exist for you. Deal with it.
/r/MensRights16/08/22 12:39 AM
9

Lol. Because we cannot make such choice, apparently. Gurl, you REALLY dont know much about the world you live in. But then again...r/twoxchromosomes. what to expect, but a little miss know-it-all-better?
/r/MensRights16/08/22 12:29 AM
5

Are you a man? If not, then well - no penis, no right to opinion on our matters. Edit: twoxchromosomes, so, feminist troll. What to expect...
/r/MensRights16/08/22 12:25 AM
3

Anger usuay has a real, valid reason, for men. Also, anger is good. So is hate. Both enable one to destroy opposition in a more efficient manner. Are you an enemy? If you are not, you clearly have nothing to fear...
/r/MensRights16/08/22 12:24 AM
3

What if we dont want to date, a d are still happy and acomplished? And unavailable to you on an absolute level, no matter how hard you'd want? Thats when men are called evil, too, you know? They have sooo much and a vagina owner dont get to be i control...therefore man baaaad. What are you going to do about that mindset, strangely popular among women that cannot get what they think they are entitled to?
/r/MensRights16/08/22 12:21 AM
7

If wome do something awful to men, by men's standards, guess what....they will get called out on that, instead of getting a "you go, gurrrl! Slay kweeen!" here. If you want a man that is good by your standards, then you must meet HIS standards, not just give a bare minimum and deem yourself a queen of the universe to be worshipped as a god. But you know everything better. After all, you have a vagina...no penis owner can come close to your true enlightment, lol. Woman, example 1.
/r/MensRights16/08/22 12:19 AM
6

And we will be happy while single, imagine that. No matter what females claim, men can be happy with no kweeen in their life, you know? You dont really bring that much to the table, tbh.
/r/MensRights16/08/22 12:15 AM
8

We will focus on what we see fit to focus on. If you dont like it, r/feminism is somewhere else....
/r/MensRights16/08/22 12:11 AM
3

We want OUR OWN kids, not just SOME kids.
/r/MensRights16/08/22 12:10 AM
3

Do you have evidence to the contrary? Men lose everything in the divorce, usually. Why wouldnt that make them unhappy?
/r/MensRights16/08/22 12:06 AM
11

If those men are of not use, they are accesories, and not persons...thats the mindset of those women.
/r/MensRights15/08/22 11:48 PM
7

Yep. In those minds, vagina owners are gods thwt can do no wrong ever no matter what. Delusions of grandeur...
/r/MensRights15/08/22 11:47 PM
5

Any of reasons you stated, and add: "...and write a book about it, too!" At the end. Fame, money, social standing....whats not to like?
/r/MensRights10/08/22 12:35 PM
4

Being disgusted isnt even close to a reaction thwt is good enough. Any woman is part of the problem, if she "belived a victim" even once, no matter who that was, or the reason.
/r/MensRights10/08/22 12:31 PM
23

Emotional gain from spooling drama, as well.
/r/MensRights09/08/22 11:46 PM
5

Easy answer. Woman will lie when it suits her and when she knows she will get away with it.
/r/MensRights09/08/22 11:45 PM
-18

Nope. Its primarily a crime against justice system itself. Thus, penalty should be death.
/r/MensRights08/08/22 01:48 PM
1

Women are fundamentally unable to be true MRAs. They bring dilution of goals and definitions, and often will brong uncertainty into the discussion. What is ours, should stay in our total unilateral controll of the discussion. Only men ajould have a voice about anutjing related to men and their issues. Otherwise, we'll soon have feminists pushing their debilism into our matters.
/r/MensRights08/08/22 12:31 AM
2

Men have to go through all that, too, and we are still expected to perform. I see no reason not to expect same in return, without fail. If she cant so it, she is not good enough preciselly because that is how she will treat me.
/r/MensRights05/08/22 02:01 PM
3

They work longer, they work harder, and results are still worse, lol
/r/MensRights05/08/22 01:59 PM
1

False. Female partner is always a net money loss for a man. So what if he earns more, if he has no real control over HIS money, anymore? Real, meaning total and absolute, as it rightfully should be.
/r/MensRights05/08/22 01:57 PM
3

And/or he gets the ultimatum of "earn more or i'll destroy your life in a divorce, hubby dear".
/r/MensRights05/08/22 01:55 PM
1

So?
/r/MensRights05/08/22 01:54 PM
1

So what? Consequences must always come to a hater. Thus, she must pay.
/r/MensRights05/08/22 01:53 PM
3

Misandrists are not friends of men.
/r/MensRights05/08/22 01:53 PM
1

She is not your friend. You only think that she is. But you do you.
/r/MensRights05/08/22 01:51 PM
2

Your friend, op, is a typical female. What to expect other than...that?
/r/MensRights05/08/22 01:50 PM
5

So then, why are you even heee, feminist troll? You have no right to opinion on our matters, anyway...
/r/MensRights05/08/22 01:42 PM
12

There's a stigma around any kind of male sexuality, not just around male oriented sex toys. After all, women cant have it if there is something better at anything than themselves, lol. Wuich, in case of sex, isnt exactly tbat hard...
/r/MensRights05/08/22 01:40 PM
9

Horsie gurls love their horsies. Sometimes, in more than one way.
/r/MensRights05/08/22 01:33 PM
11

Illegal drugs are illegal for many good reasons, and its not just about the health, but also about cutting finances of criminal organisations. The "friendly local dealer friend" is, more often than not, not exactly who you think they are.
/r/MensRights05/08/22 11:00 AM
15

Yep. Law is what it is. She is apparently, just unable not to be a crim. And somehow, world apparently should accomodate her...
/r/MensRights05/08/22 10:55 AM
22

Ya, she should feel lucky its not the philippines. She'd get a literal death sentence there.
/r/MensRights05/08/22 09:53 AM
13

Or maybe, she should just not bring illegal su stances to a country that, like, bans them and awards you jail time for posession? Naaaah, to much work for a female druggie.
/r/MensRights05/08/22 09:52 AM
1

Are you a feminist? Such convinient excuse, which excuses nothing, really.
/r/MensRights03/08/22 09:10 PM
2

They appreciate what we posess and give them, not us as a person.
/r/MensRights03/08/22 03:24 PM
4

For that, women would have to be able to even fundamentally appeeciate men. This doesnt happen.
/r/MensRights03/08/22 03:08 PM
25

Also, bi male erasure by women. As a bi guy, guess how I know.
/r/MensRights03/08/22 01:19 PM
22

Of course not. Women that actually do their part, and fight on the front lines, are rare and few in number. As usual. Now, the ones that promptly fucked off to safety in poland, and can exprct everyone and their dog to support and help them....well. Those are a legion. Tbh, a bit of a shitty behwvior, considering they all want to co-decide in politics...what say you, local feminists? Should we enforce equality here and now, even if by a tiny bit?
/r/MensRights03/08/22 01:15 PM
2

You mean, once men take what is theirs back, instead of dying? Why would we want men to die?
/r/MensRights29/07/22 03:50 AM
2

So? Work better and more hours, gurl. And defend your own life yourself, too. Men dont exist for you, in any way, shape, form, or situation. We only exist for ourselves.
/r/MensRights29/07/22 03:47 AM
3

Nope. Should get a noose - tried to destroy someone's life, thus her own life must be forfeit. Its a basic justice.
/r/MensRights21/07/22 10:15 PM
2

Equal response to evil, is by definition evil. And politics is not about being good, but effective.
/r/MensRights21/07/22 10:12 PM
3

Unless its ME that is telling them anything, it is NOT my business, and NOT my problem. And I dont recall telling them what to do and how to be, personally. ​ Tho, i DO recall them telling ME, what, who, and when Im expected to be...
/r/MensRights15/07/22 10:09 AM
2

This is your take on things, not mine. ​ You are stating that he's a misogine, just because he's talking out of his life experience. Which is shared by quite many men, you know, by the way...? Where's the misogyny in that, exactly? Because he dares not to trust you? Because he has an audacity to not trust women? ​ Well, I wonder why...
/r/MensRights15/07/22 09:54 AM
4

Yep. Many men will never be able to even tell their story.
/r/MensRights15/07/22 12:10 AM
9

If he didnt consent to fatherhood, its not his kid, and not his problem.
/r/MensRights15/07/22 12:04 AM
1

What women are told, is not our problem. Dont derail.
/r/MensRights15/07/22 12:02 AM
5

Real feminity is double standards. Easy as that. And there will always be a few nicely worded reasons as to why its "good"(for women, obviously) when she does it, but evil if a man does it.
/r/MensRights15/07/22 12:00 AM
1

Inadvertant hate is still same hate, and we should strive to punish it just as much. Women are not lenient towards usz so its just an equal response if we are also not lenient, even slightly.
/r/MensRights14/07/22 11:58 PM
2

Do you have evidence that he is not correct, tho? Or just feels?
/r/MensRights14/07/22 11:56 PM
1

Funny as it goes, eh? ;) that what goes around - comes around.
/r/MensRights13/07/22 02:54 PM
1

...you do realise that men dont just act out of their own experiences, but also take other men's experiences into account, as well? Maybe its a surprise for you, but we TALK to each other, you know? Do you suggest se shpuld never ever take anything into account? Id have to be an utter, total, complete idiot to do so. And dont tell me, or ther men, what we "should" or "need" to do. WE will decide that, not you. Based on what WE deem best for US, and US alone. You want coexisting? Change a few law…
/r/MensRights13/07/22 02:42 PM
1

Doesnt matter WHY it was said. Words have consequences, and worst of those consequences is a loss of trust. Feminists fucked up, big time, and many men just dont want to trust their kind anymore. Why should we? Because you think and whaaaant? How about...no? Deal with it, because we are not coming back to you. Men built their world from zero, and You just assume that you are entitled to their everything, because you...exist? Protip: if someone built something, and you want it - yeah, you gonna h…
/r/MensRights13/07/22 01:49 PM
1

You know, feminists literally had the "we need men like a fish needs a bicycle" spiel. Guess what, bicycles dont need the fish either... We want what is good for US at any given moment. Your problem is thinking that we are still on a same team. Thanks to feminists, we are not. Take that issue to them, not to us - we didnt start it, some of us just said "ok, if you want it so - thrn we are not together anymore".
/r/MensRights13/07/22 12:53 PM
1

So what if it didnt happen lately? Dont deflect. Men are forced to serve in war, you seem to not see that, willingly. Doesnt fit your story? And dont hide and cower behind "but babies". Men dont exist to die for you, and its time women gave back the lives lost by men forced to fight, in their defence. We'd like to sot back in safety a bit, now, you see? Stop your entitlement. You pay for health, etc? Cute. How much is paid/used by which gender, by percentage/amount? Could you provide a verified …
/r/MensRights13/07/22 12:26 AM
1

Men cant bear children, but science is working on it, tbh. You can get a viable egg from stem cell already, relatively easily. And artificial uterus is being animal tested on cattle and mice - so you know...you might find out on few decades, that men can indeed have kids without you... Each person should get what they "need" you say? Then work for it. Nothing is free, and we do not consent to upkeeping you for nothing in return, anymore. And we dont consent anymore to taking any risk for you, no…
/r/MensRights12/07/22 10:08 PM
1

Ph, my dearz ypu have it all wrong..i just expect you to have no bonuses stemming from your gender, none whatsoever. Nothing else. And I also expect you to pull same equal weight in society as men do. No but's or if's. If I am to provide everything, so are you. If I am to die on a front line, so are you. If I am to take caee of kids AND bring in enough money ANd everything else, without complaining - I expect same of you. And I dont care thwt you "cant do it". You can. You just dont want that re…
/r/MensRights12/07/22 07:48 PM
1

That too, but also constant leaving early / coming in late / doing private business during work hours. Which she cant be really even reprimanded for, much.
/r/MensRights12/07/22 06:25 PM
1

If dads DO take days off, they get paid less, and get shit on, by their oh-so-loving spouses. Make up your mind. And yes - he is nlt there to sacrifice for someone who will never sacrifice anything for him, really. Its not penalising someone for the baby. Its jot paying them more than they actually DO. Men do more? Then they are entitled to be paid more. Its not enough to claim she works "more efficient" - she is to work as best she can, constantly, same hours. Otherwise she is not as good as th…
/r/MensRights12/07/22 06:23 PM
1

Well, did the employer made her do it? They didnt, in fact they have no right to opinion. And men, well, dont take constant days off "because baby". They work, per contract. So why should men pay, exactly? And your employer isnt there to make sure you have babies you want. Thats on YOU, alone. If you cant do all that is required, you need to choose one thing and stick to it. Why employers employ that woman? You do realise that I have no right to deny her, in any way, right? And I'll be held resp…
/r/MensRights12/07/22 02:03 PM
3

Also, its a loss for the employer when she takes care of kids, etc. Dont you think that this should be equalised a bit? Employeer should not be forced to lose money because of a private decision of an employee who is not even allowed to be fired. Company exists for its owners profit, not for women to have it easy in life.
/r/MensRights12/07/22 01:18 PM
1

Oh look, a misandrist.
/r/MensRights12/07/22 01:16 PM
6

Thats what that list is there, for, really.
/r/MensRights12/07/22 01:05 PM
8

Good, aka servants, lmao. No, thanks, gurl. You do your own woek, and buy your own dinner.
/r/MensRights12/07/22 01:04 PM
1

Leave, and find one that doesnt hate half of society for the simple fact of existing. Leave, before she damages you.
/r/MensRights12/07/22 01:00 PM
10

Most probably, big bad evil unseen patriarchy [tm] made her do it. Right, our local feminists?
/r/MensRights12/07/22 12:59 PM
1

Wouldnt be the worst outcome for us, tbh.
/r/MensRights06/07/22 03:08 PM
1

Religion is hate by definition, and should be just as much abolished, as feminism. Especially a religion that damages men.
/r/MensRights05/07/22 12:29 AM
1

Why should we destroy something that profits us? Illogical, irredemable mistake.
/r/MensRights05/07/22 12:26 AM
1

Its about what is best for us, not about whats nice for women.
/r/MensRights05/07/22 12:25 AM
2

Its not "stooping down" to anything. Its basic equal response. Right now, men cant really employ a REAL response, unfortunatelly (like proper criminal sentencing of any woman that perpetuates feminist hate speech), so we should pick next best thing.
/r/MensRights05/07/22 12:24 AM
2

Is is most profitable to men, tho? Is it a best outcome for men? Those are THE most important questions for us.
/r/MensRights05/07/22 12:21 AM
-2

Meh. You dont win wars by being good. You win wars by being machiavellian, cruel and effective.
/r/MensRights05/07/22 12:19 AM
6

We are not whole. We are not together. Deal with it.
/r/MensRights05/07/22 12:16 AM
3

What for? First sentence is already a lie and hate speech.
/r/MensRights05/07/22 12:15 AM
4

Moee like, genuinely want to use men as tools.
/r/MensRights05/07/22 12:13 AM
1

What for, really? This post of yours seems to be a private agenda, not helping men...
/r/MensRights05/07/22 12:10 AM
3

Welcome to politics 101. Feminists started this spiel. We are just responding.
/r/MensRights05/07/22 12:07 AM
1

Men. Im just not willing to talk with someone who made half of society intk a public enemy, for personal gain. It serves no purpose, really, to talk with a feminist. It will result in nothing else than more feminist lies being spoken, so why bother?
/r/MensRights04/07/22 02:37 PM
2

No consent = crime happened. Its thats simple. Trivial or not, she is at fault, and must pay.
/r/MensRights04/07/22 02:32 PM
21

Regarded as....by females, therefore invalid by definition. Women dont have a right to define us, or anything related to us.
/r/MensRights04/07/22 02:29 PM
24

No such thing as toxic masculinity. Masculinity is inherently good and positive, only. If its toxic, its not masculinity.
/r/MensRights04/07/22 02:28 PM
1

I was. Im from europe. You are NOT getting a prepubescent kiddo to a naked beach and not leaving in any other way than in police custody. You are also not getting pardoned for exposing sexual parts of your body to minors. No matter your excuse.
/r/MensRights03/07/22 11:09 PM
2

Dont defend a female pedophile.
/r/MensRights03/07/22 11:08 PM
1

Yes. If the law was broken - and it was - she must pay.
/r/MensRights03/07/22 11:07 PM
1

Law is law, and MUST be followed. Tear her down.
/r/MensRights03/07/22 11:06 PM
1

In a fair scenario, men would find a way to claim her life. If only just to prove a point that active, predatory pedos will not be tolerated.
/r/MensRights03/07/22 11:03 PM
2

In other words, jow its more equalised. I guess its another example of the type of equality that women dont like that much - one that is not only totally beneficial to women. :V Fortunatelly im not from US of A, so... i can go all out idgaf about american women :P
/r/MensRights03/07/22 10:57 PM
2

If you ever considered yourself aligned with feminism, or you support them in any way, shape, or form - you are an enemy and part of the problem by definition. We choose our enemies, not you.
/r/MensRights03/07/22 10:52 PM
1

If its deterimental to men, its misandry, not misogyny. Get your terms straight instead od pushing around feminist agenda. If its deterimental to women, its not a MRA issue at all. Let feminists deal with their own issues, alone, like oh so powerfull gurls they supposedly are. They dont need us, after all, they said it themselves, and not just once too. We should only act if their actions infringe on us.
/r/MensRights03/07/22 10:50 PM
2

Yeah, cknscription must go. Men must stop be deemed sacrificial lambs. Women are oh so powerfull, id say its their turn to die.
/r/MensRights03/07/22 10:32 PM
2

Doesnt matter why feminists are like they are. Its enough that they are behaving in a way thwt is deterimental and destructive to men. And there is no such thing as "fair" when its politics and diplomacy - there is only our gain, or someone's loss that are good. Divide? Feminism started it. We just said "ok". Supposedly, they dont need us, wasnt it something like that? If now they do need us after all, we will set a price...
/r/MensRights03/07/22 10:30 PM
2

So what? If she pointed at him, she must pay.
/r/MensRights03/07/22 10:51 AM
3

You have no right to tell us what we "should". We should do what is best for us at the given moment. Especially considering that if we dont take care of our needs, then noone will - and especially not a woman.
/r/MensRights03/07/22 10:38 AM
3

Yes. Women can choose not to be a parent AFTER a child is born. Legally. We expect the aame right, no matter what.
/r/MensRights03/07/22 10:36 AM
4

Yep. We treat you alike because its just more efficient and safer for us to do so. Once proper legal consequences are being dished put to fucked up women, we will be in position not to do it. You never once met a woman that generalises? Read feminist classics, like Dvorkin. If tou ever supported feminism, you support her ilk. You expect us to take a risk, and you are yet to realise that you are not entitled to us taking any risk for you. We dint exist for you. We only exist for ourselves. We are…
/r/MensRights03/07/22 10:35 AM
2

If you see us working together with feminists, you are part of the problem.
/r/MensRights03/07/22 09:18 AM
2

This was already answered by mez several times. You willingly are not acknowledging it. I'll go block you now, since its obvious that you are herr to only troll, and subvert real discussion with feminist BS.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 05:55 PM
1

Vasectomy is sterilisation, not a birth control option. Stop spreading this BS.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 05:53 PM
1

In EU. They also can forbid you access to estabilishing fatherhood with testing, at the same time claiming that you ARE a father and are to pay her. Neat, eh? In fact, she does not have to inform you of being a parent, untill she changes her mind a few years down the line - and now you are on a hook not just from thst moment, but back payment WITH INTEREST. Neat, eh? She can also just drop the kiddo off to a church, medical clinic, fire house, etc, anywhere really - and she's good to go here whe…
/r/MensRights28/06/22 05:52 PM
1

Her fault for not using proper birth control and getting a kid, then. I didnt tamper with anything, after all.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 05:48 PM
2

Exactly. If she can legally NOT be a parent (and she has multiple available ways to achieve this), we expect SAME, LEGAL, RIGHT. No matter what that causes to anyone.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 05:47 PM
1

Proof, please? A respected scientific source ofc not a feminist one, and not written by a woman (due to possible bias). Also - scientific source, meaning a full paper, not just a piece of BS like few numbers in a a table. Complete with statistical source, methodology info, and so on.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 05:46 PM
1

Interesting, last time I checked, feminism says that men dont have a right to opinion...
/r/MensRights28/06/22 05:44 PM
1

What "?"? You dont understand that situations talked about here are not just USA and its states?
/r/MensRights28/06/22 05:42 PM
1

Lol. You are still on a false narration with a false equation. We are talking about not being a parent. Not about anything else. Stop manipulating, female.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 05:41 PM
1

Sex does not equal children. He only consented to sex, not to children. Dont manipulate.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 05:40 PM
2

Lmao. No. I expect her to be an adult, and do things that adults do when they are parents. She is not serving me. She is expected to be a proper fucking parent to her fucking child. Apparently, that is unacceptable to feminists without world paying them sweet sweet monies.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 05:40 PM
1

You do realise that world is not just the holy US of A, right?
/r/MensRights28/06/22 05:38 PM
1

And how many men do it themselves, while still being shat on by women for "doing nothing"? Id say millions easily. What YOU in private, doesnt matter. Statistically, men do WAY more than women, without seeing a cent for it.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 05:37 PM
1

You think this, since you state opinions pointing to that. In truth, you should stpp trying to push your opinions, and trying to define what men should think/be. Men will decide what is a "good man", and why, and when. Not women. Why? Because women cannot guarantee that they will not push private self-serving bs over whats good for those men.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 05:36 PM
-1

Same god, same guilt.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 05:31 PM
3

Half your pleasure from sex is gone. You dont know better, so you dont see the problem. Plus, its often a female deciding about a male body, which is by definition, misandry and hate (no matter the intent) and should result in cruel punishment enough, so that it does not ever happen. If she is so inclined to xut the body parts away, she can go and cut her own cunt off. Her body - her choice. Keep out of someone else's body, or pain will come to you.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 05:30 PM
1

So? Dont have kids you cannot afford. His money is NOT yours, ever. You should not even have right to be informed on HIS money. Plus, you are there for love, right? Not for money, like a prostitute would...?
/r/MensRights28/06/22 05:28 PM
1

It takes one to abort, tho.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 05:26 PM
1

If they didnt cknsent to be a parent - women have options. Many, i fact. Men have zero legal options. And last I checked, those women are not paid to nanny their own kids.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 05:25 PM
1

Lol What about the right to adopt the child out without knowledge/consent of another parent - that women DO have? With same "no consequences at all" pretty please, too. No buts or ifs. Because ko, men cant just leave their kids at the fire station, lke women can, you know? But thats probably somehow different if she has a vagina :P
/r/MensRights28/06/22 05:24 PM
1

You dont "have" him. Dont speak of people like they are things. I wonder if he knows your post history here?
/r/MensRights28/06/22 05:22 PM
1

If women feel entitled to us providing, well...it goes both ways, or no way. Home repairs, plumbing, car servicing, private security, private driver, garen scaping...it has a nice price too, you know? List could go on.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 05:20 PM
0

So, basically what religions did and do to non-belivers, for last few thousands of years? Id say thats just an equal response, really. In my country, religious politicians openly state that non-belivers and LGBT are not people, and not human beings, with church as far as the pope, openly accepting this. Cute. What did you do, good religious one, to stop such people? Nothing? Then you are an enabler.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 02:17 PM
1

So what? It is still not accetable behavior, and punishment should be due.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 01:11 PM
2

Religion is hate, and any religious practice must be excised from normal society.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 12:17 PM
4

You know, you dont get dick cheese from not being cut. You get it from not washing your dick properly. Protip: its easy to wash your dick. Source: any uncut guy that washes his dick properly. Edit: btw - im bisexual. Had my share of pussies as well as dicks. The only time I had to stop because of cheese, was because SHE wasnt washing her cunt properly. Surprise, women get cheesy down there too if not keeping hygiene. Maybe we should cut the labia off, as a routine, to help with that? Because app…
/r/MensRights28/06/22 12:12 PM
3

Probably a woman.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 12:10 PM
3

As if female preference had any value, lmao. Give them no choice, problem solved.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 12:09 PM
0

Religion is the worst form of hate speech, by definition. And should be eliminated from normal society, with extreme.prejudice and lethal force.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 12:08 PM
4

Only person that can decide is the child in question, after they grow up enugh to know what exactly they are getting themselves into.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 11:55 AM
2

Not our problem. Its problem for women, not for us to solve. After all, we are not aupposed to even have an opinion. Thats what women wanted, right?
/r/MensRights28/06/22 11:53 AM
2

Do you understand, that tuis thread is not about female problems with roe vs wade? Womens issues are for them to solve. Not our problem.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 11:51 AM
4

So? This is not a correct sub for this topic. This sub is about men, and this threadnis also about men. Not women. We shpuld nkt derail it into female issues thread, really.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 11:50 AM
1

And, you know....I can be perfectly happy on my own, without catering to a pussy. If she wants to be in my life - its on my terms. If she cannot accept the terms - she knows where the doors are. I'll not run after her, I'll just wait a bit for another one. You seem to expect men choosing attractiveness to women over whats best for them. Why is that?
/r/MensRights28/06/22 07:39 AM
1

And yet, its feminists screaming "where are the good men gone" louder and louder, and its them having a problem with MGTOWs, just for said MGTOWs not wanting to be in relationships. Some are calling, outright, for bans, or for additional taxation of single men "for social justice". Why is that? ​ Why so desperate? They can wait, after all...right? Its not about their money and assets, surely...but why those taxation voices exist? ​ Or is it jealousy, that men are just...better, and having a time…
/r/MensRights28/06/22 07:34 AM
1

You got it the other way around than you should. You can get waaay too much, and should be able to get nothing whatsoever - unless he decides it suits him at the moment.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 07:33 AM
1

Yep. No woman is entitled to anything from any man. After all, you are there for love, right? Not for his money and assets, supposedly? ​ Then you have no need to know.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 07:31 AM
1

Shame that you dont understand that you are not entitled to man's money and assets. EVER. He works for himself, even in marriage. Not for you, kween. Now go and slay some monies yourself, great independent one. Or starve.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 07:30 AM
1

If we are to be held responsible for something, give us same means of exiting the situation as women have. You can remove the child even after its born, by adopting it out. Even without fathers knowledge or his consent. ​ As such, we expect same right to NOT be a parent. No matter what it causes to anyone. Either this, or remove that right from women, entirely. ​ And stop with "but what about wahmyn und babiez?" spiel. We are talking about what is needed by MEN, and what MEN expect. You are just…
/r/MensRights28/06/22 07:28 AM
1

Gurl, we consented to SEX, no to BEING A PARENT. Sorry, but consent rules. "But that doesn't mean that men get to try to force women to lower their standards to meet theirs." funny how that is exactly what women do when men have high standards. "Raising children is also work" chores. Not "work". Work is what you do for profit. Stop your feminist bs. Unless we get to count pennies that you owe us for doing specialist-level work around the house? With the car? Around the house? "Emotional labor"? …
/r/MensRights28/06/22 07:23 AM
1

Better for who? Men? I doubt it.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 07:19 AM
1

You might not, but usually, women DO have a LOT of problems and issues. And shitting on men for wanting to use them is a female partner's norm. Interestingly enough, feminists seem to also have problem with anything related to male sexuality, if its not connected to giving pleasure to a woman. Why is that?
/r/MensRights28/06/22 07:17 AM
1

Sorry for a new mobile device, I guess? Also...ad personam much, effectivelly? But what to expect :V
/r/MensRights28/06/22 07:16 AM
0

You do realise that men dont only act depending on what happens to them personally, right? We also talk with other men, and take their fates into account. ​ You do understand such concepts, right? That we are not basic animals?
/r/MensRights28/06/22 07:15 AM
1

You are the one getting pregnant. Its in your interest not to be pregnant? You handle it. Men dont exist to handle yours anything.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 07:14 AM
1

" If the father has been in a career for the last 10 years and had had time to nurture and grow it while his wife takes care of his kids, he needs to pay her" She was already paid, in being supported for 10 years while not providing ANY income for the family. She is expected to be a parent AND have a career. "What you accomplish during your marriage is shared equally between both spouses" is something that has to go, obviously. You cannot possibly be entitled to such extent.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 07:12 AM
6

You have no way of telling the difference, tho.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 01:10 AM
1

Divorce makes men pay, tho. Which isnt acceptable in any form, no matter what. Access to our money and assets must end with the end of the relationship. Kids? If she cannot upkeep them, she cannot be a primary custody parent. She can go work on her career, and pay support to HIM. This will enable the father-child bond to develop, and will only benefit the child in the end. Her? If she is not his partner anymore, she can go and starve. You have no right to expect us to care after the relationship…
/r/MensRights28/06/22 01:09 AM
1

So, why are you expecting child support? Should have used that birth control, and should have choosen a partner better. Why should they, or society, pay you for your failures?
/r/MensRights28/06/22 01:06 AM
1

Of course we do the same thing. Diplomatic rule of equal response. Want it to stop? Make a first move.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 01:03 AM
4

So what? It is there in the law, and that is ENOUGH. Write is in a way that is oblifstory for women, or remove obligstion from men. Only then I would belive you that you want equality. Of course, AFTER we have as many dead women due to obligatory front line actoon as men died in the hsitory of mankind. Equality must be absolute, after all. Which is tens of millions, easily. And then I can accept you having same right to vote and hokd political power as men.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 01:01 AM
1

Wars are atarted by politicians, not soldiers. Go lewrn about how your country even works. And this fact is dou ly so problematic, since woman can be someone that decides on a war, and will send us men to die for her whims, while not being there on the front line, ever, precisely because her body gives her a choice in what is an obligation for men.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 12:57 AM
2

Yep. This sub should not allow women to post/reply without moderation. We have way too many haters and subversionists here.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 12:55 AM
2

Legalise and enable prostitution, problem solved. When it fails, sex bots will come one day, too. With better pussy than you could eveer provide ,) if you can have your toys we can have them too - right?
/r/MensRights28/06/22 12:53 AM
2

Why do you expect men to accept subpar woman as a partner? She is literally worthless.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 12:52 AM
2

Yes, hypergsmy is an issue because its either this, or equality. You want equality, right? Then drop your hypergamy, with real criminal penalties if you do not. Works wonders, I heard.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 12:51 AM
2

Adult chores are not "work", baby. Go have a real career.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 12:49 AM
1

So, you think gynocentrism is ok? Hypergamy is ok? What happened to equality, and respect, then? Because if you treat a woman like a queen, she will never think of a man as a king - for her he is a servant. Also, world doesnt just exists to carer to pussy owners. Even You thinking that men should protect you is literally hate crime. Why do you expect someone will risk life health, and legal status for her, given the fact that she is expendable? If not her, another will come by, one day. Health, …
/r/MensRights28/06/22 12:48 AM
2

Yep. You are wrong. First mistake, you think men and women are a same team. We are NOT on the same team anymore. Feminism stated that, and we said "ok". Now we will act accordingly, with our good as our sole interest. Second mistake, you seem to feel entitled to your male partner paying in any way, shape, or form for your choices. We will not. If it was your decision, it is all on you to pay for it. Deal with it, woman up and if you want kids, you also MUST now have a career too. If im expected …
/r/MensRights28/06/22 12:40 AM
2

That encouragement ia almost always negative - in form of penalties like alimony, aupport, and other such theft.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 12:25 AM
1

What should be eliminated is women having any right to even be informed on mans money, assets, societal status, and any power he might hold. They are not hers to have, anyway. And as such, any child support or alimony, should be solely based on mans good will and his own volition at the given moment. She should have her own career anyway, and a good one at that. We want a partner, not a dependopotamus. Yes, even if shes pregnant. Yes, also while she has a child to care for. Men are not income pr…
/r/MensRights28/06/22 12:23 AM
2

If women can try and train men to be what they want, we should, by all means, do exactly the same. No matter what - equality.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 12:17 AM
2

It becomes a problem when a) the standards are high to an absurd, and b) men get shamed and walked over for not meeting those standards - without any consequences, and even if they dont even try to date that specyfic woman. Issue b) being the key here - accountabilily for misandry should have properly extreme levels.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 12:14 AM
1

Their happiness is not exactly our concern. Our sole concern should be good of men as a group, and advancing said group's needs and interest. If women have a problem with that, we can talk once they take our actual hapiness into account.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 12:00 AM
1

Welcome to diplomacy 101. There is only one good. OUR good.
/r/MensRights27/06/22 11:56 PM
1

Its women that started ahitting on us over our partner choosing. I see no reason not to act equal response.
/r/MensRights27/06/22 11:55 PM
1

No child support must exist. If her vag is her castle, our wallet is ours. She has no right to even be fully informed if we think its not best for us. No matter anything.
/r/MensRights27/06/22 11:53 PM
1

No. Solution is what is best for us at the moment.
/r/MensRights27/06/22 11:50 PM
18

So, having part of your genitals forcibly removed is not a problem for you? Even without your consent? Here, let me just cut your clit off. For you know, medical reasons. Yeah, thats it. Still ok with that? Or is it only if its not about your group, when its ok? How cute. Let me guess, local feminist / woman?
/r/MensRights27/06/22 11:46 PM
27

Yep. They said it themselves, so its true. They have to know what they need, after all, surely.
/r/MensRights27/06/22 11:33 PM
1

Dont tell men what they "should". And women being split is not our problem either.
/r/MensRights26/06/22 02:54 AM
2

Go and vote for women, and go and run to be elected. Noone is stopping you. Thats one. Two - us men should be focused on issues of men, obviously we are not a team since feminists clearly atated that they dont need us, so...
/r/MensRights26/06/22 02:36 AM
3

If you are not in her interest pool, you are not a person, but a resource - that is why.
/r/MensRights26/06/22 02:18 AM
0

Pro tip: pick your partners better.
/r/MensRights26/06/22 02:14 AM
10

And thats our problem how, exactly? Its women's issue, for them alone to solve. They dont need us more than a fish needs a bicycle, after all, right? Well, you go, gurl.
/r/MensRights26/06/22 02:11 AM
4

Lacks an option for "indifferent to women", really.
/r/MensRights26/06/22 01:55 AM
3

They pretty much are, anyway. Unless you like STDs :P
/r/MensRights26/06/22 01:54 AM
6

No. We dont exist to cater to women. They are adults, they can deal with it like adults do. On their own.
/r/MensRights26/06/22 01:52 AM
2

Convenience over ethics. Morals are a thing of the past toxic masculine system after all...or something.
/r/MensRights26/06/22 01:49 AM
0

Bring evidence. Then its easy to prove. If you dont have one - you dont have a case.
/r/MensRights26/06/22 01:48 AM
1

Its an issue of WOMEN, not ours. They can deal with their own shit, like adults do. We dont exist to fight their petty wars just because they whaaaaaant us to.
/r/MensRights26/06/22 01:43 AM
14

Yeeeah, ee should only belive the feministsz they know it all! Lmao
/r/MensRights26/06/22 01:37 AM
7

Feminists did, tho. If you call yourself one, you are guilty by asociation - just enough for me not to ever belive you and trust you. Just like that :)
/r/MensRights26/06/22 01:30 AM
18

I.e. a troll ;) Edit: lmao, was right afrer all.
/r/MensRights26/06/22 01:28 AM
17

Yeah, if you ask that....i think logic 101 and reading 101 is that way ----> And you being dovnwoted is a sign. Think of it.
/r/MensRights26/06/22 01:21 AM
10

So, just like "all men rape" and "mascilinity is toxic" feminist spiel. Goes both ways, you know?
/r/MensRights26/06/22 01:19 AM
9

And did they ban the war and draft yet? Or gave an option for women, and kept an OBLIGATION for men, like they usually do? Actions, not words.
/r/MensRights26/06/22 01:17 AM
18

So, am I to not take something into account, just because it doesnt suit you or something? Nope, doesnt work that way. Dvorkin, Solanas, the rest - happened. Duluth model- same, happened. This. Has. So called. Consequences. Deal with it. You are not worth being forgiven, imo. Its not hate. Its you laying down in a bed you made yourself. And hating it, because it stopped being beneficial to YOU.
/r/MensRights26/06/22 01:15 AM
6

You know, im yet to know a woman that thinks she is not entitled to anything, for example ;) and this goes to the very basics of society and relations, mind you. Just an example ;) get it?
/r/MensRights26/06/22 01:10 AM
21

Why talk? Its enough to read your classics. Maybe lets start with Dvorkin? Or maybe Valerie Solanas? Or similar? That list could go in, you know...You are same ilk if you even once supported feminism in any way. And I dont xare what you say you belive. I'll just go and analyse laws pushed into the system by femijists, for example. Are they good for men? No? Then what do you expect, me supporting you? In return for what, fucking half society over because it suits an ideology of yours? Its just ea…
/r/MensRights26/06/22 01:08 AM
36

Ah, yes. A "not true scotsman" can now be checked off.
/r/MensRights26/06/22 12:59 AM
7

If you expect men to fix your issues, there is a price to pay. We are not free use societal tools for solving female issues. Cant pay the price? Oh well...too bad.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 03:07 PM
12

Real equal treatment in family courts, maybe? And I mean EQUAL, not "equal in a way that suits women". Or maybe real equality of retirement ages? Or maybe end of obligation of men fighting in wars, where women have that only as an OPTION? Yet they, as a politicial officials can, guess what....decide on sending men to die. Cute, eh? Or maaaaybe, real equal work for equal pay, with EQUAL WORK being the point here? No more men covering woman's task at work because baaaaby. And no more taxpayer / pp…
/r/MensRights25/06/22 03:05 PM
-2

Just 10 million where her life should be forfeit. Sad.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 02:51 PM
3

Prochoice. Abortion should be a basic human right.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 02:49 PM
73

Fat-promoters: fat is beautiful and healthy! Medical professionals everywhere: facepalm
/r/MensRights25/06/22 02:48 PM
4

Good. Should have known better than to use system against other people for personal gain.
/r/MensRights14/06/22 07:42 AM
10

pissed off feminists in 3...2...1... good, good.
/r/MensRights14/06/22 07:40 AM
1

Why should men pay for someone not of their group? Women can just, you know, man up. Earn more, put in more tax for their group. This obviously benefits someone - men could get way better social services thwt way, for example. Surprisingly, you see no benefit for anyone...or is it thst you dont see WOMEN benefiting? Telling...
/r/MensRights12/06/22 11:59 PM
1

If she is not good enough to his standard, why should she be treated as a worthy one? You really want to set someone's standards by which they are to judge you...? Im not anti-woman. Im pro-man's gain. To women, im only totally indifferent.
/r/MensRights12/06/22 11:58 PM
1

Nope. You are not getting the problem. "Common decision" means potential of a woman uaing a man like a tool. Even smallest potential of that is unacceptable, must be blocked by legal means, with properly devastating consequences for her, for even trying to do that. And same thing if she didnt do that "on purpose" - as she cant prove thwt beyond any doubt, she must be treated as suspect. You know, like metoo did to accused men. Taste of own medicine, all that jazz. Gendered, because we are NOT a …
/r/MensRights12/06/22 11:54 PM
1

We are a group. We should support each other.
/r/MensRights12/06/22 11:49 PM
1

You dont win wars with nice words. And feminists are like putin anyway. So...yeah. dont be a 5th column.
/r/MensRights12/06/22 11:48 PM
2

Response is gendered because we are talking about men's needs and expectations. MEN, not "couples". We dont get free daycare. The child gets day care. She OWES it to that child. And being that its my child too, I expect that of her, too. And I also expect her to have a career at the same time. And everything else. Just like women expect all that from us men. Without fail. And this ahould be an expectation on a level of a written law. Otherwise, some women will try to skew thst one way only. As u…
/r/MensRights12/06/22 11:47 PM
1

Exactly. Same attitude. Welcome to equality. Which includes diplomatic rule of equal response. Forgivness just doesnt work that well. And it also includes realpolitik.
/r/MensRights12/06/22 11:40 PM
2

Prenup ia not good enough. Everything that we deem ours, must stay ours. We are not a team anymore. Feminism caused that. Unloading my shoulders at home? Lmao. Most men work full time, AND have a career, and then work at home while offloading kids from her ass at the same time. With barely any rest. On top of that, we will be expected to be a properly sexy and good in bedz too. If we fail at anything, we will get fucked over on her whim, by a divorce court. Meanwhile, women: hurr durr, I only wa…
/r/MensRights12/06/22 11:37 PM
1

Where there is a good will, there is a way found. Where there is an ill will, there is a reason given.
/r/MensRights12/06/22 11:31 PM
1

Her choice, her consequences. If she didnt know better, men ahould not pay for that kind of worthless "partner".
/r/MensRights12/06/22 11:28 PM
1

Prenups aee not good enough. When they are 100% finality and safeguard everything, includong what man worked for during the marriage - then it would be a bare minimum. "Common decision" can be ...negafivelly influenced by that woman, in various ways. For all purposes, we must treat her as potentiwlly malicious party with a conflicting interest- its just safer and more effickent to do so. Lets not pretend that all women are angels. They are not. And men must be effectivelly safeguarded against th…
/r/MensRights12/06/22 11:27 PM
2

Again - her choice. Cant expdct others to face consewuences for her choices, now can we?
/r/MensRights12/06/22 11:24 PM
1

Her choice, so her consequences. And her alone. If she starves, then so be it. If she is an ex, its not our problem.
/r/MensRights12/06/22 11:23 PM
1

And his decision can change, at any moment. Sorry, you do t get to have him forever, if you are - for example - not good enough. Why should he then pay for it? Not to mention of women puahing men into decisions, in various ways. Which is a norm, nor an edge case.
/r/MensRights12/06/22 10:01 AM
5

Yep. It takes 30 minutes a day of actual work to keep the home clean. Literally. Not 8 hours.
/r/MensRights12/06/22 09:59 AM
2

Nah, we just dont look for reasons of why something is impossible. We look for a way to cut it, despite those reasons. Its called being an adult. Life is hard, and demanding. Deal with it, and do your part as expected instead of guilting others to do your part for you. Especially that we all know, that women will not do the same for us, when we are in need.
/r/MensRights12/06/22 09:58 AM
1

Then they shoyldnt have sacrificed the career. If men do it, they get exchanged for a better model.
/r/MensRights12/06/22 09:55 AM
-1

No. This opens up a way for women to emotionally manipulate men into a situation that will be long term deterimental to them. Even if its just a potential, this is no longer acceptabl, no matter the reason.
/r/MensRights12/06/22 09:52 AM
2

Any money that men put into the system, should only ever return to them and other men. We are not on the same team anymore. After all, women need us like fish needs a bicycle, right? It should obviously include them not using our money, assets, anything...right?
/r/MensRights12/06/22 09:50 AM
2

Well, thwts interesting, considering that men ARE expected to do all that, on the regular. Why should we not keep women to the same standard? Cant cut it, little girl? Or just entitled to be a queeen of the universe? You yourself are talking about giving it all. Then do it. You expect that from men? Show it and bring it youreelf. Practice what you preach.
/r/MensRights12/06/22 09:46 AM
1

No. Men must reatin EVERYTHING they worked for, ever. Women uaually spend, or force spendong od WAY more money, than they worked for. And more often than not, that spending is a waste.
/r/MensRights12/06/22 12:55 AM
2

They affect women because eomen are just shitty in many ways. If they would only man up a bit, and do their part fully, then things would be better for them, really.
/r/MensRights12/06/22 12:52 AM
0

It is? Cute. Now its time for restitution, with proper interest, of anything men ever lost to women, in history. Then we might talk. Every penny must be accounted for.
/r/MensRights12/06/22 12:51 AM
11

Is it not her castle, tho? She has total control over it, after all. I expect same total control over what is rightfully solely mine - my money that i earned with my work (for myself, not for mythical "us", she can work too, you k ow? And she should be EXPECTED to, too. No matter what. Therefore, she should not need my money, at all, ever, if she is not up to auch a basoc task, she is not fit ti be in any form pf relationship with a man), and my assets. Its basic justice, nothing else, that she …
/r/MensRights12/06/22 12:50 AM
2

Usually, its on expense of men, tho. And even those women usually dont date down, just look even more higher up the ladder. Men often take on woman's job in the company, because she is absent yet again. Or just a shit employee, that you can remove because babies.
/r/MensRights12/06/22 12:06 AM
2

Well, women can go and date down if they so choose. Why should men be the ones to do it?
/r/MensRights12/06/22 12:04 AM
3

Yep Women with lesser status should never be considered for anything that one night stands. This should include friendships as well.
/r/MensRights12/06/22 12:04 AM
19

No. If her vagina is her castle, then my wallet is mine. She should have known better than to be with an empty account and a shitty career. Isnt she an adult? Same with tax money. Unless money only comes from other women, it should not be spent of supporting women in any way.
/r/MensRights12/06/22 12:02 AM
1

More like, women should be better employees, so they are worth more, actually. No, being on a conatant leave is not being a good employee.
/r/MensRights11/06/22 11:59 PM
1

If you dont see it, you are part of the problem. Thus, an enemy.
/r/MensRights11/06/22 11:58 PM
3

Any support of a woman after marriage must totally cease to exist, in any form. She is an adult, she can work. If she cannot, not our problem anymore. Ahe is no longer a partner, she is just another miss nobody.
/r/MensRights11/06/22 11:57 PM
1

So? Our problem is that MEN can be at a loss, which should never ever happen, no matter what. What ia ours, must be controlled solely by us. Money, assets, societal status, everything.
/r/MensRights11/06/22 11:55 PM
60

Such provileges should cease to exist in the first place. Mans assets must belong to him, and only to him. Same with money, and societal status. Women can earn her own.
/r/MensRights11/06/22 11:52 PM
3

What we earn with our work is only ours to decide about. In this aspect - yes, those are the same. Unless you think that men are ATMs for women? Protip: just as women dont exist to cater to sexual needs of men, men dont exist to cater to financial needs and expectations of women. She can earn her own money, you know? Its, like,...expected from an adult, nowadays. If she is not inclined to do so, thats on her alone. And, quite telling how you skipped EVERYTHING, and went to ad personam....a femin…
/r/MensRights10/06/22 07:17 AM
7

Ao, lets now talk about feminists puahing the idea that rape is only male on female, legally. Nice, eh? Or maybe why feminism expects men to do chores, yet wants women to be actually paid for that same thing? Child support? Spousal support? Feminism enforces that hate too. Mans money and assets is as much of a castle as female vagina - women ahould have no right to even be informed, much less access said money and assets without man consenting. And if she cannot upkeep a child - she should never…
/r/MensRights10/06/22 01:00 AM
1

So? Why ita sone is of no concern. Our only concern is how that affects us - men. If it affects us in a negative way, it should be destroyed, together with the perpetrators. The rest is not our problem.
/r/MensRights10/06/22 12:49 AM
3

Same thing. Being a feminist means being a man-hater.
/r/MensRights10/06/22 12:46 AM
1

She can work while pregnant. If she chooses not to, its not on men to upkeep a freeloader. If he is to ALWAYS provide, then she also must do it. No matter why. Find a way to do it, instead of pushing around reasons. If she fails, seems she is not good enough. In other words, equality is a bitch.
/r/MensRights03/06/22 12:53 AM
1

It is still unreasonable thst it even exists.
/r/MensRights03/06/22 12:51 AM
1

Alimony and any child support should only be given on a mans good will at any given moment. Otherwise it is prone to female manipulation.
/r/MensRights03/06/22 12:50 AM
1

The problem being, it will depend on who is the inquisitor. And I can guarantee you, thst will be a hardline feminist extremist.
/r/MensRights03/06/22 12:48 AM
39

Like amber turd? Lmao. Its enough that they dont lie and manipulate - and they will be taken seriously. Its just too hard not to lie, apparently.
/r/MensRights03/06/22 12:43 AM
7

We dont care about their anything. They are not entitled to us caring about them. In any way.
/r/MensRights03/06/22 12:42 AM
10

Not our problem, not our group. She can call her feminist gurls for help. We are not a team anymore. Deal with it. Why should he risk his health, life, legal status just so that she has it good for nothing in return too? Because you whaaaant? Well too bad. And guess what, its not hate. Its indifference. Something way worse.
/r/MensRights03/06/22 12:41 AM
11

And where are the women of courage? As always, nowhere to be found. :V
/r/MensRights03/06/22 12:38 AM
1

Sbe needs an executioner for trying to destroy a mans life, not health care.
/r/MensRights03/06/22 12:37 AM
1

Everything you described is not masculinity. Masculinity is always, by definition, good for a man in question. Mind you, only for him. Men dont exist for society to profit from, and especially not for women. We exist for ourselves, first and foremost.
/r/MensRights30/05/22 12:19 AM
8

Even a single misspoken word is enough to end it all. Love is but one thing, standards are another. And it takes even more to run a relationship, than just love and standards. WAY WAY MORE than that.
/r/MensRights30/05/22 12:16 AM
5

Any single act defines a part of you, forever. And lie by omission is still a lie.
/r/MensRights30/05/22 12:11 AM
2

Then change the policy accordingly, all the while removing a man hater from position of authority.
/r/MensRights30/05/22 12:06 AM
1

Not our problem, tbh.mour problem is having to have a longer queue for some Karen to have a chat or fix her makeup.
/r/MensRights30/05/22 12:04 AM
1

Sure, if they invent, build, and manage them themselves.
/r/MensRights30/05/22 12:04 AM
1

Not good enough, gives females opplrtunity to xause issues to men using urinals, and or to perv on them. Also, queues.
/r/MensRights30/05/22 12:01 AM
2

And make us wait in queues because some worthless Karen needs her half hour chat with her bestie? Lol, how about no?
/r/MensRights30/05/22 12:00 AM
5

Perverted females, thats all.
/r/MensRights29/05/22 11:56 PM
7

Real feminism is entitlement mixed with hate. If only by being an enabler. As for defining...if feminists want to define men, its just fair and equal for men to define feminists, is it not?
/r/MensRights29/05/22 11:54 PM
2

Because no woman ever takes anything too far. Drop the "masculinity", then we might talk. Masculinity is ALWAYS good. If its not - its not "masculinity" by our drfinition. What is "good" for that man, only he defines. If its deterimental to anyone other than men - its not our problem. Society can always be forced into changes - feminism shown us thst this is possible, by various means. We should learn to be effective.
/r/MensRights28/05/22 11:05 PM
2

Masculinity is always good and positive. Its never toxic, by definition. If it is toxic, it is not masculinity. And "not toxic" doesnt mean "not bad to others". It is to be good for a man, and thats it.
/r/MensRights28/05/22 09:43 PM
6

Women raise broken men. Plain and simple. Mothers are just fundamentally unable to look past "got to raise him so that others can benefit from him" female mentality, even where it comes to their own child.
/r/MensRights28/05/22 09:39 PM
1

Meh. Only belive evidence.
/r/MensRights28/05/22 09:26 PM
1

Of course we CAN. But is it the most profitable to us at the moment? Is it most safe? Most efficient? Or is it just "moral"?
/r/MensRights21/05/22 09:12 PM
15

so? If they had a shitty contract, its their problem. Men's money are not for anyone else, but men.
/r/MensRights20/05/22 01:00 PM
6

how to tell men that they are living wallets, without telling men that they are living wallets.
/r/MensRights20/05/22 12:59 PM
1

noone is entitled to be considered beautifull universally by everybody.
/r/MensRights20/05/22 12:47 PM
1

You mean the purges like those advocated for by Dvorkin? Solanas? More deeds like those of oh-so-feminist-hero Asata Shakur? List could go on. If you support feminism in any way, you support that above. What middle ground you want to have, exactly? Stop being a Chamberlain, and start being Churchill.
/r/MensRights20/05/22 12:40 PM
1

also feminists: "all men are rapists", "#killallmen", and so on. You tell me who is in the wrong.
/r/MensRights20/05/22 12:38 PM
1

dialogue? what "dialogue" can we have with someone that outright states we are an evil enemy-of-the-state ? Time of talking was before feminism. Now, we have nothing to talk about with them. Its not recoverable in any meaningful way, imo.
/r/MensRights20/05/22 12:37 PM
1

If it was consensual sex, the woman has a moral obligation to involve the father in the abortion decision. you mean, she should be legally obligated to such involvement, surely? Under severe criminal penalties if not adhered to, for whatever reason.
/r/MensRights20/05/22 12:32 PM
1

just signing the rights away is not nearly enough, since the existence of the child means it can be later on used against that man, for example if a law changes later, or as an emotional pusher. Just a legal abortion is not good enough to safeguard all men, always, 100% - as they should be.
/r/MensRights20/05/22 12:31 PM
4

If her words had no corroborating verifiable evidence, they cannot be considered as truth. Its on HER alone to provide evidence of truth, not on us to trust and belive without REAL evidence. Words are not evidence. Words are words.
/r/MensRights20/05/22 12:20 PM
1

Its a man's WALLET that is forced to pay actual real money, and lots of it, for her unilateral decision, tho. ​ Would you work to ban this criminal entitlement of females?
/r/MensRights20/05/22 12:18 PM
1

did you ever identified as a feminist, tho? If you dont disagree with them, you potentially support them against us already.
/r/MensRights20/05/22 12:16 PM
2

female-on-male rape is not rare by any definition, other than feminist one. If she pushed to it in any way, its rape. If she hinged anything on the wheter or not there's sex - its rape. If we retract consent post-factum - its also rape. ​ At least thats how it works for male-on-female rape. I see no point in treating women better than they treat us.
/r/MensRights20/05/22 12:14 PM
1

Abortion is also a case of financial and legal autonomy. We might have consented to SEX, but not to being a parent. Noone has a right to override one's consent.
/r/MensRights20/05/22 12:12 PM
1

unless they give us a right to legal and financial abortion, we have nothing to talk about. Men must not be even considered a father, unless they consent to that at the given moment.
/r/MensRights20/05/22 12:11 PM
1

is this sub for you? depends if you are here for us, or to spread more "agreeable" "good" feminism, really.
/r/MensRights20/05/22 12:09 PM
2

yet another woman faking being our ally for personal gain.
/r/MensRights20/05/22 12:02 PM
1

if you didnt provide evidence of truth, its a lie. If you lied, you falsely accused.
/r/MensRights20/05/22 11:49 AM
8

its not about what they were wearing. It was introduced specyfically to make men unable to provide evidence in i.e. form of communication logs with an accuser, that prove him being not guilty. Because everything related to sex, in any way, is "Sexual history". Everything can be put under that law, and in effect, if she is not consenting, you might just as well not provide ANY evidence of you being innocent - because it will not be accepted anyway. ​ Neat, eh? Stop defending liars, false accusers…
/r/MensRights20/05/22 11:44 AM
13

which reasonable arguments? "Feeling" based criminal system?
/r/MensRights20/05/22 11:39 AM
3

misoginy is not our issue, tho. Therefore, its not an issue at all, from our perspective - which should be THE only thing that matters to us.
/r/MensRights20/05/22 11:38 AM
28

Woman kills a man: gets named a feminist hero, and gets an organisation named after her. Case in point: Asata Shakur.
/r/MensRights20/05/22 11:16 AM
2

Go and look not on what feminism says it wants to achieve, but what it actually does and achieves. We dont care about a word. We dont care about whatif's. We dont care about what you say you were meaning and hoping to achieve and cause. We care about outcome of your action. And for men those outcomes of female, and especially feminist actions are universally shitty. Yet female, and especially feminist expectations of us are up there like never before. We also do not, and will not tolerwte ANY do…
/r/MensRights19/05/22 10:29 PM
1

Why are you even here? You are clearly someone who does not belong here, really. Just a troll, and im yet to see any woman here that is not one.
/r/MensRights19/05/22 08:19 PM
2

Real solution for starters: criminal penalties for women for trying to damage man's interpersonal relationships. No matter way, how, why, what did she want to acomplish, to what extent - classify that as DV, and tear down her life. Problem solved.
/r/MensRights17/05/22 10:43 PM
1

You stated that masculinity can be toxic. This is literwlly defining it. Masculinity is by definition, always good. It might be bad to others than men, but that is perfectly acceptable and good if its good for men.
/r/MensRights17/05/22 10:40 PM
3

We dont need "help" in this manner. We need women to a) listen, and b) doing as told where/when it comes to our matters. Women dont have any right to define anything related to men, masculinity, and so on. Well, unless we get to define their feminity and so on...you know, for equality ;)
/r/MensRights17/05/22 10:39 PM
2

Women dug their own hole of distrustz yes. Does not mean that its on us men to fix this and change ourselves over it. Why should we even give another chance, when we can just learn to live without women? Its not that hard, tbh.
/r/MensRights17/05/22 10:37 PM
3

Male friendships suffer because of toxic female partners, usually. Not because of men.
/r/MensRights17/05/22 10:33 PM
1

Saying words is not "help", no matter what women say. Its not a help for us, and that is what matters to us. If it helps them, not our issue, not our interest, really. Not to mention, that female "helping" us this way, usually turns out very bad foe us in the long run, when she decides to use this against us - which is a norm, and one that has no real punishment too.
/r/MensRights17/05/22 10:31 PM
1

Nice lies are you telling there, but you should stop.
/r/MensRights17/05/22 10:29 PM
1

And why should give a shit about what women, and especially what feminiats think, really? If they have a problem with us, they know where the doors out are. One way, to the highway.
/r/MensRights17/05/22 10:28 PM
2

Its still not what you were ask to provide. And id up the game, and ask for an actually scientifically credible source, not a feminist one, and not a study by a female - since this might generate additional bias.
/r/MensRights17/05/22 10:25 PM
3

That would depend on if its most beneficial to us. Hate is good, tbh - it enables one to destroy their opppnent more efficiently, with more success.
/r/MensRights17/05/22 10:23 PM
3

Men built the country, fought and died for it. Did women do the same, to the same extend and capability? No? Then why should they get same privileges, exactly? Just because they did something, isnt even remotely close to doing enough.
/r/MensRights17/05/22 10:21 PM
1

We should be oushing for what is most beneficial to our group, first and foremost.
/r/MensRights17/05/22 10:19 PM
1

Yep, you are a troll.
/r/MensRights17/05/22 10:18 PM
1

Anything wahmyn dislike at any given moment, really.
/r/MensRights17/05/22 10:16 PM
16

Lol, so what? Read feminist classics. Dvorkin, Solanas, so on. Ffs, they literally glorify people like Asata Shakur, a convicted murderer - after all, she murdered a man so fighting patriarchy, therefore good. Or should we talk about terrorism that was by sufragettes movement? Or all the false accusation practice nowadays? Why should we forget and forgive, when its easier, and more efficient to just geoup all them as same? After all, they dont really cut themselves off from their extremists, ins…
/r/MensRights17/05/22 08:59 PM
9

Same as rapists, but only one of those groups is penalised.
/r/MensRights17/05/22 08:56 PM
5

Wtf. Glans should NEVER be "keratinised" under normal circumstances. Its not a regular skin cover. It keratinises due toMGM because its a scar tissue, due to all the microabrasion going on when you have it constantly dry and uncovered against clothing. Its NOT a norm Source: majored in biology, also uncircumcised.
/r/MensRights17/05/22 08:52 PM
9

Infant male genital mutilation is abuse. Period. Done w/o consent, done usually w/o ANY reason other than worthless debilism like religion or tradition. Its doubly abusive if the perpetrator is female, due to class/group of the victim not being her own - she should not even have any right to opinion on the matter, not having a penis herself she cannot possibly understand the topic fully. After all, they say that no uterus - no opinion, right? This should obviously be extended to our issues.
/r/MensRights17/05/22 08:48 PM
1

Its reality. Women often stay in career several times shorter than it takes to get a degree. Once a kiddo shows up, she goes to be a SAHM forever more.
/r/MensRights17/05/22 04:45 PM
0

Period syncing was debunked long ago, last time I heard.
/r/MensRights17/05/22 03:12 PM
0

A female politician, what to expect other than hate and sexism, really?
/r/MensRights17/05/22 12:26 AM
3

And even then, most ukrainian women were cowards, turned their tails, and ran - instead of fighting and dying for their country. All the while happilly pointing out gloriously dying men, that had no choice. Scummy. Really scummy.
/r/MensRights17/05/22 12:24 AM
1

No. Masculinity is for our benefit. If she has a problem with it, she knows where the doors out are. One way.
/r/MensRights17/05/22 12:20 AM
1

So? Not our problem.
/r/MensRights17/05/22 12:19 AM
2

If the result is good for men, by standards set by those men, then its good masculinity.
/r/MensRights17/05/22 12:18 AM
1

Cute, now proper penalties for the ones that pushed the idea. Real penalties, of course, otherwise its not really any news. Societally, damage is done anyway no matter how they backtrack.
/r/MensRights17/05/22 12:17 AM
0

Tbh, in the past, genocide was just a tool of politics, really...
/r/MensRights17/05/22 12:04 AM
2

Are you saying that men are idiots that cannot feed themselves? If anything, its women that would be screwed and limited to picking berries, because it was men that were actually doing the hunting.
/r/MensRights17/05/22 12:03 AM
1

Supporting us? LOL, since when? Where? How? By having "feeeeeelingz"? Worthless.
/r/MensRights16/05/22 11:58 PM
0

Cute. Now lets see how many years they stay in the career line before she retires to a baby mommapotamus mode, while expecting her partner to financially cater to her.
/r/MensRights16/05/22 11:55 PM
3

Credible, non-feminazism source, please?
/r/MensRights16/05/22 11:51 PM
1

Would be benefixial to men tho, therefore I see no reason not to look for a way if possible...because why not? Feminists would not, and do not think twice, they just fuck us over as a rule. And the aame goes for wome in general, quite often.
/r/MensRights16/05/22 11:49 PM
7

If she wants to decide on politics via vote, like we do, then she must die for the country like we do. And i mean die, not "support role" lol.
/r/MensRights16/05/22 11:47 PM
2

Hopefully they will get better screening for failures so there are no more flt. lt. Kara Hultgreens on the carrier wings. She got a pussy pass into a job that does not forgive and guess how that turned out for her...
/r/MensRights15/05/22 12:59 AM
1

Meh. The original was not that great, and the sequel looks to be just a follow up of "how much cool lack of realism we can plug in this time?".
/r/MensRights15/05/22 12:55 AM
0

Meh. Just another unrealistic action movie crap. Id really REALLY would love this topic covered in a realistic way in a movie. Would not have as much rule of cool, tho, so noone is going to make it :/
/r/MensRights15/05/22 12:54 AM
0

Tbh, if you are in a fighter wing, you already are top like 5% of the crop, so...
/r/MensRights15/05/22 12:52 AM
0

So, nothing new, really? :P They hate us anyway, so.
/r/MensRights13/05/22 06:26 PM
0

Good for us, therefore good. The rest is not our issue, really.
/r/MensRights13/05/22 02:39 PM
1

And her health is employer's problem, because why exactly? ​ If she is not worth the money put in, she should be replaced with a person that is actually capable. Permanently replaced.
/r/MensRights13/05/22 02:37 PM
2

nope. its to guarantee that that period was indeed problematic. You know, to weed out liars.
/r/MensRights13/05/22 02:36 PM
1

if you have health issues, go and solve them yourself, instead of expecting less work and same money just because you have "issues".
/r/MensRights13/05/22 02:34 PM
1

if so, then why do they need additional laws for that, really?
/r/MensRights13/05/22 02:31 PM
1

Feminity is lying when it suits you. Thats why. Her pain, her problem. Not her employer's.
/r/MensRights13/05/22 02:30 PM
1

they should get ZERO additional. Its their problem, not society's problem. And certainly not employer's issue to solve for them.
/r/MensRights13/05/22 02:29 PM
1

They will fail to acomplish even then. To acomplish, you need to have work in your blood, not up your ass like they do.
/r/MensRights13/05/22 02:26 PM
1

chivalry is dead, and feminism finished it. suck it up, gurl, and do your work yourself. We are not on a same team.
/r/MensRights13/05/22 02:12 PM
1

its still your adulting you have to do. Noone will pay you for that.
/r/MensRights13/05/22 02:11 PM
1

"work" more unpaid hours caring for children, and doing domestic chores this is not "work". This is being an adult and doing your share of chores in relationship. If you want pay for that, good riddance from our lives.
/r/MensRights13/05/22 02:10 PM
1

so? Not the society's problem, and not your employer's problem. You have days off to use just like anyone. Use those, or pop a pill.
/r/MensRights13/05/22 02:07 PM
1

hopefully, they get less money from work for that. For equality.
/r/MensRights13/05/22 02:05 PM
1

If there was a patriarchy ruling as women claim it is, that march would be obliterated like political opposition in north korea.
/r/MensRights13/05/22 01:59 PM
1

Well, they are feminists, what did you expect? :V
/r/MensRights13/05/22 01:58 PM
2

tbh, no prison time should be there. She tried to destroy a life. Therefore her life must be taken. Proper justice.
/r/MensRights13/05/22 01:54 PM
2

what should be punishable is her not presenting real evidence to corroborate her word of accusation.
/r/MensRights13/05/22 01:53 PM
5

For her, size does not matter...unless she can use it against you in court.
/r/MensRights13/05/22 01:50 PM
8

Nope. Just a woman with a goal. Outcome for her justifies all means.
/r/MensRights13/05/22 01:43 PM
1

Yes, if one is determined enough, you can get your hands on many things. Doubly so if one is good with the internet / the whole darknet thing.
/r/MensRights13/05/22 01:41 PM
3

you mean, because female gets additional benefits out of being married, surely. ​ shitty deal.
/r/MensRights13/05/22 01:36 PM
1

Even if she is trustworthy now, she will most probably change her mind when it suits her.
/r/MensRights13/05/22 01:35 PM
1

give the kid to mommy, mommy knows best. Yeah, right.
/r/MensRights13/05/22 01:34 PM
7

regular women aren't good enough. tbh, most of "Regular women" are WAY worse than that AI.
/r/MensRights13/05/22 01:31 PM
9

In reality, it would be women living in a primal gatherer's society, at most, and still screaming about how it is man's fault.
/r/MensRights13/05/22 01:30 PM
-23

its not just about prejudices "melting away" some day. Its about payback for those prejudices, too. We should never forgive.
/r/MensRights13/05/22 01:29 PM
1

I am, imagine that. Strange, eh? Surprise, most men here are pro choice. For BOTH groups, not just for women on our expense. Meanwhile, women want chocie for women and obligations for men. Aka typical feminity of double standards, because she haz neeeeeds and whaaaants.
/r/MensRights13/05/22 07:43 AM
2

A lie, and manipulation are not the same, tho.
/r/MensRights11/05/22 11:08 PM
2

Im yet to see men lying in court to the extent #metoo kweens did and do routinely. And Im yet to see them going unpunished for that. And welcome to equality - if women can play this way of being manipulative, so can we.
/r/MensRights11/05/22 10:58 PM
170

Depp vs Heard case is literally an example of why we should never trust a "victim" on her word alone. She will lie if it suits her, and especially when there is no real vengeance for such action.
/r/MensRights11/05/22 12:32 AM
1

So? Feminists seem preeetty organised when it comes to pushing their agenda into politics and law. Maybe its time to put that will to work for goals other than own profit? Where there is a will, there is looking for a way to achieve. You seem to only look for a reason not to, and for excuses.
/r/MensRights09/05/22 10:20 PM
1

If good actors do nothing to excise bad ones, what does it say about them? My call is worthless and not trustworthy at best, and enabler or same evil in disguise at worst. Can you provide independently verifiable evidence to the contrary, thst gives total certainty, without expecting us to take any risk for you?
/r/MensRights09/05/22 09:57 PM
1

Its not just about marriage, but also making sure no "mommy" could get access, too. Its an easy resolution for many potential issues on that side that currently go unpunished. Also, gay male couples would benefit a lot here, too, so there's that.
/r/MensRights09/05/22 09:40 PM
1

No "feeling" here. Just equal response to feminism. Really, list of feminist fuckups could go on for literal miles. And no "personal" - you are assuming that men are only reacting (or should be allowed to...?) to what happens directly to them, and nothing else? Or...what is it, exactly? Do you find it disturbing that we share information and use logic to define our next actions in reaction to your words and actions? You have a problem with a fact that we must care for ourselves first, and not fo…
/r/MensRights09/05/22 09:38 PM
1

Imo, if you feel that motherhood would require you to lose any part of who you are - its a sign its not a road for you to take. Those things are supposed to build us, not tear us down. Even if ones like Asata Shakur, or Andrea Dvorkin, or Valerie Solanas are not your icons, they were embraced and glorified by your feminism. If you considered yourself a feminist even for a second - for me you are an enabler at best, thus just as guilty of that hate. A liability, that cannot be trusted. Sorry - ju…
/r/MensRights09/05/22 08:18 PM
1

Nope. Not personal. But you know....might be a new thing to you but men talk with each other, you know? And we talk honestly, even. And we even think later, and base our later actions and views on that, too. Sometimesz we ever read statistics... Surprise, surprise. Like a normal person does. Strange, eh? Btw, are you male, or female, if I might ask you? "Never hit her" precludes later proper self-defence if need arises. If she starts, we should not shrink from properly finishing an engagement. U…
/r/MensRights09/05/22 06:00 PM
1

And i's argue that teaching boys to never hit her, teaching them to compromise and sacrifice because she wants, teaching them to change for her, etc is what mothers do as a routine. Whixh leads to tragedies, like young boys dying trying to save yet another female kid. Why should men be expected to do that? May e its really time to held mothers accountable for this? Accessory to murder/suicide, all that jazz....and its only a single example of many. This is real toxicity in our lives, not us havi…
/r/MensRights09/05/22 05:28 PM
-11

More like, feminity.
/r/MensRights09/05/22 05:22 PM
7

If women have an option not to face any consequemces, I expect the same option. Welcome to equality.
/r/MensRights09/05/22 05:18 PM
1

Mothers dont teach boys how to be happy and fulfilled. They teach boys how to be a tool for their future female partners ti use.
/r/MensRights09/05/22 04:21 PM
9

Feminists threw a fit about men not giving a f..ck about them. There is but one thing more scary and more anathema to a female than hating her - its called indifference.
/r/MensRights09/05/22 03:12 PM
0

Boys need dads to teach them how to live their lives for THEIR OWN good, happiness, and benefit, first and foremost. A woman is just an addition to that life, not some ultimate greater good and priority.
/r/MensRights09/05/22 03:11 PM
0

Feminists are already raging that this removes the holy decision of a woman on wheter or not there is a child. Because, if she does not want to have a cake, noone should ever have it too, unless SHE makes that choice for them.
/r/MensRights09/05/22 03:07 PM
2

Oh, but it has indeed impact on our rights. It enables men not to be forced into marriages if they want to be a parent. Of course, feminists will RAGE (they already do, in fact), but this change is sure to come.
/r/MensRights09/05/22 03:06 PM
1

For some areas, yes. For something as complicated as duplicating an uterus and the whole process of fetal development, I doubt it will come this century, really. ​ Even the sheer amount of clinical trials will be INSANE, and thats comparing to other complicated clinical testing that already can take literal decades (because noone wants another Talidomide on the market, really - and that was just a simple small mistake, and not even on the hand of the company that relased the drug, but on the law…
/r/MensRights09/05/22 03:04 PM
1

This should be a basic human rights for men to have their offspring without toxic (or any, really) feminity mixed into its upbringing, and without female decision on wheter or not they are good enough to be parent. Women already have that choice, I see no reason we should not have it too.
/r/MensRights09/05/22 03:00 PM
7

No. I consented to sex, and only to sex. Not to conception, not to being a baby daddy. Sucks but its her getting pregnant, and her problem to solve - unles I consented to that, and did not revoke the consent later down the line. ​ Why? Because this is feminist stance on having sex, nowadays. If she revokes consent even after the deed is done - its rape. I see no reason that men should not be allowed to revoke their consent to being a parent, even tens of years down the line - and making women pa…
/r/MensRights09/05/22 02:55 PM
7

Its not enough. If you want to rule the country, you are to die for it as well.
/r/MensRights09/05/22 02:51 PM
49

I just love the duality, how women want to decide on politics, but dont want to defend the country they would rule over. ​ Shitty, a bit. Just a tiny itty bitty bit. But then again, not that tiny.
/r/MensRights09/05/22 02:50 PM
5

"I cant have it because I dont want it, and if I cant have it, noone will!"
/r/MensRights08/05/22 11:43 AM
1

So, just feminity, really.
/r/MensRights02/05/22 09:49 PM
2

Ignore, remove her from your life, and find a new one.
/r/MensRights02/05/22 09:45 PM
-2

No. Women inherently have no right to have any opinion on our matters. We are not a team.
/r/MensRights02/05/22 09:41 PM
1

Even emotional gain is enough not to trust without proper verification.
/r/MensRights02/05/22 09:38 PM
-4

Men have an inherent right to define ourselves. Women should never do it.
/r/MensRights02/05/22 09:34 PM
-3

So? What matters is why did she do it, exactly? If she had any personal reason, even slightest, smallest one - she was already using us and our matters as a tool to her own end. Why should I trust her, in such situation, that she will not turn when its profitable for her, for example? Use her, by all means. Its profitable after all, for us. But she is not an ally. She might SAY many things, but its things that she would not say, and things that should be first verified - they do speak a lot imo.…
/r/MensRights02/05/22 09:29 PM
7

Found a vagina owner
/r/MensRights02/05/22 09:23 PM
-3

Again - can they prove it wth a verifiable, tangible evidence? Word is worthless.
/r/MensRights02/05/22 09:22 PM
-1

Do they? Or do they are playing their own game with our issues as a bargain chip? Is it possible to verify that in a way that is not tainted by having to trust?
/r/MensRights02/05/22 09:19 PM
-13

They are not MRAs. They are female. By definition, they should have no right to be one of us, since there is a potential for them to play their own game using us. If they speak about our issues instead of giving a platform to a man, or if they voice their own opinion on our matters, they are as much of a scum as radfems already.
/r/MensRights02/05/22 09:17 PM
-1

Why should we support them?
/r/MensRights02/05/22 09:14 PM
6

Feminists cannot be our allies by definition. Can be a tool to use, at best, if suitable. You need to be actually able to trust an ally, and truating a feminist never ends well.
/r/MensRights02/05/22 09:12 PM
6

And each thing a shitty deal for men.
/r/MensRights02/05/22 09:11 PM
4

No such thing as a MRA-sympathetic feminist. Its just a 5th column. Block, ignore, and move on.
/r/MensRights02/05/22 09:10 PM
15

And the rest of "dates" are sex hookups :V
/r/MensRights30/04/22 09:50 AM
2

This exactly. Feminists have set the standard and they only want it upheld i regard to themselves, with no reciprocation or even a thank you for it in return. Shitty deal if you as me.
/r/MensRights29/04/22 09:03 AM
2

Indeed. They usually dont care, quite the opposite. Why should we? Because you whaaaant? Well to bad. Your pain is not my problem anymore. You go gurl, woman up like you should.
/r/MensRights29/04/22 09:02 AM
1

For mex feminists specifically. You cant really go around excusing and glorifying ones like Solanas or Dvorkin even for a moment, then turn around and expect men to be allies and friends just because its suddenly profitable...and then tell them that all of us are rapists, but we should support you. You cant turn a blind eye, and say "ya, but im the gooood one". You are not. Being same at worst, or enabler at best is not being a "team". Doing everything for just one of the sides while making anot…
/r/MensRights28/04/22 11:36 PM
1

So, what do those good feminists actually do to have their name cleaned ? Not really much if anything. Apart from expectations towards us, that is. That is called acceptance and being a willing enabler. And also has consequence called "loss of trust".
/r/MensRights28/04/22 02:26 PM
2

Well, once women change and restore trust that they fucked up, we might think about if its good for us to change. Untill then...idgaf.
/r/MensRights28/04/22 12:59 PM
25

True, noone should be coming to their aid. Why? They aid noone but themselves.
/r/MensRights28/04/22 12:44 PM
4

We are not a team anymore, and its the feminism that wanted this, and caused this. We will decide whats best for us, and we will support what is best for us. Women can woman up, and work on their issues alone, by themselves. If their work is against us, well, that just means conflict. Too bad. If they dont want that, they should be more careful.
/r/MensRights28/04/22 12:43 PM
2

And which went as far as commiting hienous crimes against property (like arson) , and as far as being activelly, deliberately toxic against their life partners to get them to play along. Glooorious women suffrage. /s
/r/MensRights28/04/22 12:36 PM
1

Women rights are not our issue and not our problem. If feminists dont care about our problems, we will not be caring about their issues. Equal response is a bitch, isnt it?
/r/MensRights28/04/22 12:33 PM
1

Because we should neeeever react to someone fucking us over. Like ever. /s Surprise...try to fuck me over and lets see how that goes.
/r/MensRights28/04/22 12:31 PM
2

Feminist science, today's Lysenkism XD
/r/MensRights28/04/22 12:28 PM
2

Seriously? She has shown that she cannot be trusted not to kick him from her life just because of her having issues with herself - and you want him to take her back? She cannot be trusted on a most basic level. At all.
/r/MensRights28/04/22 12:02 PM
2

Lack of professionalism. Double standards.
/r/MensRights28/04/22 12:00 PM
1

We will decide what is representative to us. And that should depend on what is most profitable to us.
/r/MensRights28/04/22 11:58 AM
3

Feminity in a nutshell: manipulation and double standards extraordinaire.
/r/MensRights28/04/22 11:55 AM
13

More correct: Some are against equality, and some say they are pro-equality, while being against it.
/r/MensRights28/04/22 11:53 AM
3

Surely a step in a good direction.
/r/MensRights28/04/22 11:46 AM
14

If the feminists are not invested for our sake, they should not be screaming about being for equality. And they should not be telling us that feminism is for everyone - because that is a blatant lie.
/r/MensRights28/04/22 11:41 AM
3

Shame on HIM for taking that woman back, really.
/r/MensRights28/04/22 11:38 AM
35

Well, i guess ding dong the witch is dead :3
/r/MensRights28/04/22 11:14 AM
14

Which is why equity should never happen.
/r/MensRights27/04/22 01:22 AM
2

I guess ukraine should stop fighting putin then, wars are bad after all /s Nope. If someone does shitty, punishment should be due.
/r/MensRights21/04/22 10:26 AM
1

She had a different mindset earlier on, and I dont think she really paid for it. Just changing her mind (or saying so, really - it cannot be truly verified after all) is not exactly much.
/r/MensRights21/04/22 10:25 AM
2

So, double standards are ok, or not?
/r/MensRights21/04/22 10:23 AM
1

Even if she says she is not currently a feminist, she is still guilty af, for being one in the past.
/r/MensRights21/04/22 10:06 AM
-6

ah, but did you do anything about it, or even tried? If not, you are as guilty, really. An enabler is still at fault.
/r/MensRights21/04/22 10:02 AM
5

well, seeing as general feminist consensus is that is perfectly OK to hate and harm men, nothing new really.
/r/MensRights21/04/22 09:57 AM
2

But are you a man, or a woman? If the latter, you are already disruptive since its a known fact, that men will try to self-police around women. Which might be deterimental to us in short or long run. We dont need thought police, even if its a passive one.
/r/MensRights21/04/22 09:47 AM
2

Tbh, im yet to see any feminist sub ban radfems. In fact, they glorify radicalism, up to idolising ones like dvorkin or solanas. Why should we not do the aame in return? We should not be better. We should be what suits us best at the moment.
/r/MensRights21/04/22 09:45 AM
1

Yeah, we should have our own space, without feminists and females lurking around, derailing and telling us what they think we should be and do. We deserve to have a place we can both vent, and work on our ideas without such interference. And its not like women can bring something valuable to discussion on topics that are inherently mot theirs, anyway. If its about men, only men shpuld do the talking and deciding. After all, women dont like men decising on abortion, for example. Isnt that correct…
/r/MensRights21/04/22 09:13 AM
2

Feminist, friendly, pick one. Its a female with a political agenda.
/r/MensRights21/04/22 09:05 AM
5

This pool misses the option of "yes, but pnly how/WHEN it suits women", really it does.
/r/MensRights21/04/22 08:58 AM
6

Thats a given, its how feminity works.
/r/MensRights21/04/22 08:57 AM
2

"Take a guess if thats a yes" :V
/r/MensRights21/04/22 08:53 AM
1

Female therapist will still prioritise her own social group tho. And thus will not be impartial, potentially.
/r/MensRights19/04/22 07:58 AM
0

I see no eugenics here. I just see making sure that parents can actuwlly upkeep their kids to a properly high standard (whixh should be expected) without leeching from society.
/r/MensRights19/04/22 07:57 AM
6

100% females, debating about something that affects men and not women. Funny, how they hate men debating on abortion. Typical female.
/r/MensRights18/04/22 09:19 PM
1

Tbh, only the best should have children. And the ones that can prove the ability to upkeep a child on a good enough level.
/r/MensRights18/04/22 09:16 PM
7

Seems just another local feminist "MRA", heh. Typical.
/r/MensRights18/04/22 09:14 PM
9

Female therapist. This alone spells problems, already.
/r/MensRights18/04/22 09:12 PM
5

He didnt consent. Its literally rape if a man does that to a woman. Therefore, she is a rapist by definition. Force her to abort, then take her life for good measure, by a state appointed executioner. Nothing less should be good enpugh for us, tbh.
/r/MensRights14/04/22 07:13 PM
1

She is a feminist. We know what she is implying. Dont defend her hate.
/r/MensRights11/04/22 12:15 AM
2

We are not living in a country of law, in the slightest. What PiS does to judiciary is a proof of this. And feminists are no better than those extremists, really. They just swing the other way, thats all. Source: am from poland.
/r/MensRights11/04/22 12:14 AM
1

Her context does not matter. Only thing that matters is that her proposal is destructive to men. Women having issues is not our issue tbh.
/r/MensRights11/04/22 12:12 AM
1

Dlaczego uwazasz ze dobro mezczyzn ma nie byc dla mezczyzn najwyzszym, absolutnym celem? Bez kobiet sobie poradzimy.
/r/MensRights11/04/22 12:10 AM
1

Doesnt matter. She wants to fuck men over. No matter what or why, our good must be our only goal.
/r/MensRights11/04/22 12:08 AM
1

Comes from worthless female feels.
/r/MensRights11/04/22 12:06 AM
1

Unless it suits us at the moment. Victory needs no explanation, and defeat allows none.
/r/MensRights11/04/22 12:03 AM
3

Feminists wanted a privilege of vote without taking on responsibility of dying for the country, tho. Our point stands - they are anout privileges, not equality. If you want to vote, and rule the country, go and die for it, first. If you dont want to, you should not get same rights as those that are willing.
/r/MensRights10/04/22 11:57 PM
20

They do say it. But, gotta look at actions, and results. Words are spoken to be broken.
/r/MensRights10/04/22 11:48 PM
0

Yeeeeah, I dont think you understand what you are talking about. I dont think you'd like literal political murders of opposition we had. Poland is going the route of Putin's russia, and fast tracking it more and more. And Im not joking.
/r/MensRights08/04/22 07:44 AM
11

Oh, we do. But right now, extremist catholic regime reigns here in Poland.
/r/MensRights08/04/22 12:55 AM
11

If women were not worthless, they would not need such mechanisms.
/r/MensRights08/04/22 12:54 AM
5

Female love is always conditional, thats why. Unless she is loving herselfz that is.
/r/MensRights08/04/22 12:47 AM
14

This should not be an option, but a legal requirement, under severe criminal penalties if a woman tries to disallow this testing from happening, or if she tries to dodge its effects / consequences. Then it would be justice.
/r/MensRights08/04/22 12:46 AM
5

In a lab setting, yes..in actuality, not exactly that high. And can be easily tampered with, in various ways.
/r/MensRights08/04/22 12:40 AM
5

And now add to this the fact, that teens often dont exactly think of what their words / actions result in for others, and you have another recipe for disaster. That, or just a malicious intent which is not exactly unheard of nowadays.
/r/MensRights07/04/22 02:09 PM
7

Dosnt matter, really. Not thinking of consequences of one's words and actions is a complete deal breaker for me.
/r/MensRights07/04/22 01:15 PM
7

Thwts my thoughts exactly.
/r/MensRights07/04/22 09:36 AM
4

I'll manage. Im a man - thats what we do best.
/r/MensRights07/04/22 08:21 AM
6

Its enough if one's reputation is destroyed in social media for them not to have much of an employment chance, you know? If she is that sensitive, she should already be in an asylum. Empathy? Kindness? I only respond with what that woman would give unto me.
/r/MensRights07/04/22 08:13 AM
3

And lies and false accusations are a female norm, not ane xception. That is how we feel, therefore its true by definition. If women caan go this route, so can we. Bicycle no longer needs the fish either, you know?
/r/MensRights07/04/22 08:11 AM
15

My soon to be ex: "I dont care what you feel". Also her, later: "he does not want to talk to me about what he feels" Well I fucking wonder why?
/r/MensRights07/04/22 12:06 AM
6

We decide if something depicts us in a good light, or bad one. Noone else. If it can be even slightly depicting in a way that can be stated as negative, then its anti-male by definition.
/r/MensRights07/04/22 12:03 AM
1

Men, of course. Our societal group should be our absolute priority. Thats what women do, after all.
/r/MensRights06/04/22 11:50 PM
1

There is only one good and effective protection and that is us being in total, unilateral controll over everything that has influence on our life in any way.
/r/MensRights06/04/22 11:46 PM
5

Men dont exist to die on the front lines. And especially we dont exist to die for women. Country? Just a place I currently live, this can change easily.
/r/MensRights06/04/22 11:43 PM
3

As always, women are useless when it somes to taking real risk and when it comes to doing what is right. They would gladly rule the country untill war happened, then leave and expect us to die for their shitty politics. Feminity in a nutshell.
/r/MensRights06/04/22 11:40 PM
2

Circumcision is a crime against real humanity.
/r/MensRights06/04/22 11:32 PM
3

Tbh, everyone starts as a virgin, so....are you saying that man's value is based on a female finding him attractive or something? Shitty....really shitty. And being a nerd gives you nice financial prospects later in life, so id say its a positive.
/r/MensRights06/04/22 11:31 PM
2

Cool. Therefore, my wallet, my opinion. You dont get a say if you didnt directly made the money you want to control. No spousal support, no child support. Ever. Under any circumstance. And if she cannot upkeep the child, she should be in jail for neglect, and have child removed from her custody, for the child's safety of course. Instead of supporting such worthless "mothers", the state should support fathers and enable them to build proper relationship with their child. While forcing that woman …
/r/MensRights06/04/22 11:30 PM
13

Imagine you are a man accused of that just because some crazy had feels, and now your life is destroyed. Sounds exaggerated? I really wish it was. But you will not do that, tou didnt see it, so its not your issue and does not matter, right?
/r/MensRights06/04/22 11:17 PM
6

That help ahould consist of copious amounts of kinetic energy.
/r/MensRights06/04/22 11:15 PM
6

So? Not our problem. Woemn are not our group, we are not a "team". Our problem is that men can now be easily and falsely accused, and have their lives destroyed. On a basis of a female word. We must care for ourselves first and foremost, because if we dont so it, then noone will. And especially not a woman. This law just proves my case.
/r/MensRights06/04/22 11:14 PM
1

If you are a woman, you are already part of the problem since you are direct beneficiary of that law.
/r/MensRights06/04/22 11:09 PM
6

...unless that pedo is female, of course. Then its the boy's fault, nowadays.
/r/MensRights06/04/22 11:00 PM
21

HOW DARE THEY NOT PLAY OUR GAMESSSS! - also women.
/r/MensRights06/04/22 10:56 PM
2

You can manipulate people into changez tho. Again, takes a really good propaganda, amd lots of work. But its not impossible. Hard, yes. Unethical, certainly. Impossible, no.
/r/MensRights06/04/22 10:55 PM
2

They are still men tho, excluding them would be...injust. we should educate instead. Takes a good propaganda, of course. But still, its education, in a way.
/r/MensRights06/04/22 10:49 PM
1

Well, we'd have to agree to disagree. Our only ethics should be our profit, as this is how our - effectivelly speaking - adversary operates. You dont win wars by being good. You win them by being effective and efficient.
/r/MensRights06/04/22 10:46 PM
1

Is it best for our political/societal goals, tho? Feminists have a history of using their relationahips/partners for political goals. We should not be above this if its profitable.
/r/MensRights06/04/22 10:42 PM
1

We should sympathise with all men, because all men are part of our group by definition.
/r/MensRights06/04/22 10:40 PM
1

Its not an issue that we should solve in ourselves. If women want us to trust them, they should do what we tell them to, and rebuild what they have lost. Then, we might trust if it suits us of course. Or not. Maybe.
/r/MensRights06/04/22 10:38 PM
1

Meh, we could always work for total unilateral control over society, for example.
/r/MensRights06/04/22 10:34 PM
1

Why not? Seems their tactic is quite effective and efficient.
/r/MensRights06/04/22 10:32 PM
11

Let me take a wild guessz female judge?
/r/MensRights06/04/22 10:31 PM
-8

Better result would be death penalty to a false accuser. Aka real justice - try to destroy a life, and your life is forfeit.
/r/MensRights06/04/22 10:27 PM
5

Doesnt matter. Protection for us must be absolute. The rest is not our problem. This is how feminists operate, so I see no reason not to use equal response and no reaaon not to act same. Women dont say they want to kill men? You should drop by on twitter, or feminist classic writings...
/r/MensRights06/04/22 10:25 PM
1

Being optymiatic seldom ends well. Its way more efficient to just not trust, but extrapolate possible outcomes, and act accordingly.
/r/MensRights06/04/22 10:22 PM
1

Im yet to see any feminist here that does not devolve into that, tho. Its what they do here, really. Sooner or later.
/r/MensRights04/04/22 11:35 PM
5

I dont "assume", these are literal examples of what already goes on.
/r/MensRights03/04/22 05:59 PM
4

Healthy? Id say there will be more blue on blue incidents, and more civillians shot because missy fucked up and mistook her service firearm for a taser, lol. The rest will be begging her male service partner to do her work for her. We dont need that.
/r/MensRights03/04/22 05:52 PM
6

Societal roles of what?
/r/MensRights03/04/22 05:38 PM
1

So, in other words, you are worthless? Id say you have a power to organise bottom-up. You just dont want to, and are looking for a typical female excuse. Where there is a will, there is looking for a way. You have no will, and are looking for a reason not to do anything.
/r/MensRights03/04/22 11:39 AM
1

So, laws are only incorrect once it profits women? Not cool. Anything we want must happen despite women being at any loss. Our rights and expectations are not to be limited by some female whims. We are not a "team" anymore, and you should remember that. Feminist framework is a hate speech by definition, we dont exactly consent to you applying any of that to us.
/r/MensRights03/04/22 11:37 AM
1

Doesnt matter if you were not aware. You are still an enabler at best, and perpetrator most likely.
/r/MensRights03/04/22 11:32 AM
2

Male reproductice right: if we didnt consent to a child, or retracted thr consent for whatever reason, then we are not a legal parent, never were, and she is not eligible to ANY support from us, or society, at all - financial or otherwise. Same with any spousal support. If your vagina is your castle, then our wallet is ours.
/r/MensRights03/04/22 11:25 AM
1

So what? Self proclaimed enemy, aka feminist. Why talk with someone like that, that will only try to subvert us, anyway? She seems to think that we are same team or something.
/r/MensRights03/04/22 11:22 AM
4

Dont want a forced response, dont start your bs that warrants it in the eye of someone you attack.
/r/MensRights03/04/22 11:18 AM
-1

Why she is or is not anything? Why should we even care?
/r/MensRights03/04/22 11:14 AM
2

Vasecotomy is NOT birth control, and reversing it is not what adverts claim to be.
/r/MensRights03/04/22 11:07 AM
1

Yep. Adapt, adept, overcome, destroy.
/r/MensRights03/04/22 11:03 AM
5

Female representation has zero value for anything else other than worthless female emotions.
/r/MensRights03/04/22 11:01 AM
21

Meh, they mostly had no choice but to stay, fight, and die. Unlike women, new "better race".
/r/MensRights03/04/22 10:58 AM
9

30% of worthless officers, lmao. That will work well.
/r/MensRights03/04/22 10:57 AM
1

And for good reason. Problem is simple here: men get an obligation of servixe, women vet a CHOICE of service. Yet they both fet the resulting privilege of voting right. See the difference? Choice vs obligation?
/r/MensRights30/03/22 10:01 PM
1

Its a risk, that a woman does not have to take on. Quite a diffeeence there, you know?
/r/MensRights30/03/22 10:00 PM
1

You mean, like men having to sign up for selective service ? ;)
/r/MensRights30/03/22 08:19 PM
1

I see a privilege of choice where men had none. Not good enough. Once same number of women is forced to die on the frontline, you might have earned aame privilege of voting. Until then, what do you want to talk about?
/r/MensRights30/03/22 03:37 PM
3

So? This changes nothing. If they wanted to, they would push for it, like they did with a right to vote. But they did not.
/r/MensRights30/03/22 02:51 PM
1

And yet, feminists didnt really push for THAT part of equality and balance....interesting, eh? ​ Maybe its time for women to be forced into military like men were? They'd ...man up so fast in a foxhole.
/r/MensRights30/03/22 02:39 PM
2

Men have already had their share of dying. Equality dictates that now its your turn, gurl. Man up, die like we did by the literal millions while your kind just sat back.
/r/MensRights30/03/22 02:14 PM
0

So, you hate so many things. Did you actuwlly do anything about them? Or are you just a typical female opportunistic enabler of miaandry?
/r/MensRights30/03/22 02:13 PM
2

For equality, we can put men in logistics, and women on front lines. Equality of dead and wounded in history, that is. Might help women see their privilege, I guess.
/r/MensRights30/03/22 02:11 PM
0

Figures...back office warrior :)
/r/MensRights30/03/22 02:08 PM
2

Oh, but it IS your job, if need arises. Or will you just leave your wounded comrades? Not cool. Would you expect them to rescue you? Or would you be understanding when they leave you alone and pull back? Let me guess...thats different? This is called being dependable. We dont want slackers that cannot be relied upon, that cannot be depended upon. And we dont want betrayers that leave those in need of help behind.
/r/MensRights30/03/22 02:03 PM
1

You do you. Just dont expect us to give freely, and go around pushing opinions on anything related to men. Only men have any right to do that. You only have a right to listen to us, when it comes to our matters.
/r/MensRights30/03/22 01:53 PM
4

Our strength is not for you for free, tho. We are not your tools on demand, girl. Go and do your own work, yourself.
/r/MensRights30/03/22 01:46 PM
2

So, in other words, you cannot be relied upon to drag the wounded from under fire? Id not want to have you in a fireteam. I want those that can be absolutely always relied upon.
/r/MensRights30/03/22 01:44 PM
1

The easiest investment to lose, too. In other words, worthless and useless.
/r/MensRights30/03/22 01:42 PM
11

Viable, medically norm sperm is never XY or XX. Its by design a half - either X or Y. Ovum always carries an X.
/r/MensRights30/03/22 11:59 AM
1

Technically yes. Ethically and legally, not exactly. At least where I live.
/r/MensRights30/03/22 11:58 AM
5

Modern feminist family, lmao
/r/MensRights30/03/22 11:56 AM
1

So? Its not even a question of impact. Its a question of basic human right to body integrity of a person. Especially, no female should ever have any right of choice, decision, nor opinion on such matter if its about body of a man. She is inherently unable to be unbiased, and inherently unable to be coming from a man's point of view.
/r/MensRights29/03/22 02:08 PM
114

She's female, so...sad societal norm for better treatment by default.
/r/MensRights29/03/22 02:00 PM
0

We dont "have to" anything apart from what suits us at the moment. Outcome always justifies the means.
/r/MensRights23/03/22 02:26 PM
1

correct term is "feminist".
/r/MensRights23/03/22 02:25 PM
1

Please provide verifiable evidence to that, otherwise I call you out as an apologist.
/r/MensRights23/03/22 02:24 PM
2

Lets joke about women in that way, and see how that ends up, shall we? ​ With YOUR real name on the line.
/r/MensRights23/03/22 02:22 PM
-2

The opposite is not our problem, and its not the topic of this thread. Stop derailing, stop spinning the discussion away from real subject and away from real problem.
/r/MensRights23/03/22 02:21 PM
1

what the fuck? Just another feminist. A norm of that ilk.
/r/MensRights23/03/22 02:20 PM
11

just abort if its a gurl. Apparently its ok the other way around, at least, so....fairs fair?
/r/MensRights23/03/22 02:17 PM
1

so, local feminists - any real action against such women? Real penalties? Or just more worthless empty feminist talk? :D ​ You are same if you dont act. You are same if you dont achieve. How does that feel? :)
/r/MensRights23/03/22 02:15 PM
9

Masculinity is not toxic by definition. It might be deterimental to women, of course, but its not our problem, untill feminists do us any tangible benefit that we would actually want from them.
/r/MensRights21/03/22 01:55 AM
9

Does not matter how influential she is. You didnt act.
/r/MensRights21/03/22 01:53 AM
12

So, did you do anything about that woman? No? Then you are an enabler. Same guilt for me.
/r/MensRights21/03/22 01:51 AM
1

You wish. We dont exist for you. We never did. We never will be.
/r/MensRights18/03/22 06:29 PM
1

Technicality. We are expected to achieve everything, at once, without fail. And get pissed in the face wheter or we achieve it, no matter our reasons, anyway.
/r/MensRights18/03/22 01:41 AM
1

We are not expected to be caregivers? Since when? Its nkt about not being able to handle it. Its about the fact that we dont exist to handle female problems. We only exist for ourselves. We are not a ream, and its feminists that declared this fact. Not us. We just said "ok". And left. And we owe women exactly nothing, ever, under no circumstances.
/r/MensRights17/03/22 11:20 PM
2

Again - dont take on responsibilities you cant keep. Again - men are expected to properly work AND properly care for their kids. She can be expected the same just as well. And I DO see the benefits of caring for kids. But Im only going to care for MY KID. Im not her baby daddy, you know? If he's not stepping up, she might have made a shitty choice of partner, but, again, that is not my problem. My problem is keeping my company running at peak efficiency, and having time for MY kids. ​ Because of…
/r/MensRights17/03/22 08:33 AM
2

Noone asks them to stop. Men can be efficient and work what the agreed to, why cant women? Dont take on responsibilities if you cant actually keep them, maybe?
/r/MensRights17/03/22 07:46 AM
3

We men deserve what we say we want, not what someone thinks its enough for us. Collective fsilure? You speak like you think that we are on a same team. We are not. We dont exist for women.
/r/MensRights17/03/22 12:23 AM
6

I was, and I still am. Because if its not my kid, then it is not my problem. Why do you expect men, and their companies, to be at a loss because of some random miss noone? Her kid is her body its her decision, right? Then it also must be her own consewuencesz to be carried by her and her alone. Unless im the daddy, i expect to not be on any loss, financial or otherwise, because of her unilateral private decisions regarding her own private life. Again - men dont exist to cater and provide to wome…
/r/MensRights17/03/22 12:20 AM
7

Im not about firing her because a baby. Im about firing her because she is constantly at a minus when it comes to hours worked vs hours on the contract. Like 50% below contract. Constantly.
/r/MensRights17/03/22 12:14 AM
7

Well sorry, cant see jokes i just letters if they dont convey them. For my defence, I slept like 4 hrs in last 36 hrs. Got a deadline and a female freeloader mommy feminist activist in same team, and got to pull that cart.
/r/MensRights17/03/22 12:10 AM
5

So, having experiences with women trying to pull off thst shit on me, is somehow my negative trait? Care to elaborate? Meanwhile, im sitting at work, its a middle of a night here, and im working my own ass off because local company feminist didnt do her tasks, and I have to show the system up and running to the client in the morning. Now, I could give the tasks to men in the team she is in, but that wouldnt exactly be fucking fair towards them, you know? Meanwhile, I cant let that freeloader go,…
/r/MensRights17/03/22 12:08 AM
7

I own my company. I guess id have to suck off a local politicians or something, lol. Also, you are saying like blowjobs for jobs and social status... are somehow a good, positive thing? Srsly? Then again, you claim to be a woman. I dont exactly expect much. Or anything, for that matter. I guess I seen too much and im too cynical?
/r/MensRights17/03/22 12:01 AM
6

Its mothers problem, but not her employers problem. And if her partner is to work AND take care of the kid, I expect her to do the same. While not compromising work hours and efficiency in any way. Business owners dont exist for women to profit for nothing in return. We are not charity circle jerks.
/r/MensRights16/03/22 10:58 PM
7

No idea what ppd is:P but im from europe. English is not exactly my first language, more like...4th. And i do work for more power daily on my own, by being a business owner. So, yeah, i know first hand how shitty it is to be forced to employ a woman. And constantly calculate wheter or not she'll do the baby move, and gtfo from the company, and what damage and disorganiaation it would cause if she got to any serious position. All the while she's statistically working half the time guys work, beca…
/r/MensRights16/03/22 10:55 PM
6

All words, no action - means its just an empty, worthless word. Achieve what you say, then we might talk.
/r/MensRights16/03/22 10:46 PM
18

Also, fuck her bestie.
/r/MensRights16/03/22 10:45 PM
0

We should do what is most profitable to us, and outcome should justify the means. Realpolitik just works.
/r/MensRights16/03/22 10:44 PM
9

So? Again: anything men own and created, should be reserved only to their total control. Want to rule a country, gurl? Go and build one. From scratch. Like men did.
/r/MensRights16/03/22 10:43 PM
6

Then do away with her, if you want to regain trust and good name. If you do not, you are same as her, by guilt of association. We dont owe you neither trust, nor forgivness, nor leniency, nor even a single chance of amends. Why should we? Its way more efficient to just condemn your kind. Of course its not just, but its not profotable for us enough to be good.
/r/MensRights16/03/22 10:41 PM
8

Or just reality of a female at work. Fucking higher ups for personal gain is a norm, not exception.
/r/MensRights16/03/22 10:38 PM
7

Work your way to success instead of demanding it. Just like we do. Support? Companies dont exist to uplift and support worthless miss nobodies. Companies exiwt to deliver profit to their owner. You're a mom? So what? Your kid is your problem, not the company's. Unless you are a slacker because of thwt baby, then it IS company's problem. Easynto solve by kicking the slacker out, promptly.
/r/MensRights16/03/22 10:35 PM
3

Of course we do care about looks. She needs to have looks AND everything else. All at once, not just rick some of the boxes on the list sometimes.
/r/MensRights16/03/22 10:30 PM
20

Women call us "males" more often than not. I see no reason not to do the same.
/r/MensRights16/03/22 10:29 PM
18

Feminists and women are all about equality and right to vote and be a nation's leader, until shit hits the fan and time of real actikn and sacrifice comes. Then its time to run like cowards, while others are under obligations to fight. How we could ever trust a leader / voter like that, really?
/r/MensRights16/03/22 10:25 PM
2

And still, you fail to realise what the problem is. What should matter to you, is your partner having it better, not a 3rd party. You are already a red flag.
/r/MensRights11/03/22 01:31 AM
3

Ots not about what you are "trying to". Its about what you achieve. If you dont want to be misunderstood, pick your words correctly and be better with them? Its your good name on line after all, and others impression of you. It ahould matter to you. But - It doesnt matter to me, really, if your name is good or bad :) nor why.
/r/MensRights11/03/22 01:29 AM
3

He is. Choice of words matters. And you are doing a shitty job on that.
/r/MensRights11/03/22 01:24 AM
2

Problem being, you have no right to expect anything from any man, ever. If you want to expect, go hire a servant. We owe you nothing ever, under no circumstances. "Supposed to"? Dont tell us what to do and how to be. Dont like us? You know where the doors are.
/r/MensRights11/03/22 01:23 AM
2

Why do you think you have a right to tell us what we should do?
/r/MensRights11/03/22 01:18 AM
2

...yeah, go and discredit medicine somewhere else.
/r/MensRights11/03/22 01:17 AM
1

Women are not superior over us, in any way. And you having that uterus will be overrated when an artificial one hits the shelves in 10-15 years (clinical research is quite advanced on that, btw - albeit still in animal testing phase).
/r/MensRights11/03/22 01:16 AM
2

In other words, you want him to be at a loss, so others profit from him.
/r/MensRights11/03/22 01:13 AM
1

We will be what suits us, when it suits us. You have no right to opinion on this matter, its not your life, and not your business.
/r/MensRights11/03/22 01:12 AM
1

What you wanted to say is irrelevant. What you did say speaks for itself, misandrist.
/r/MensRights11/03/22 01:09 AM
1

We are not like women, fortunately. And we are not same as you. And we are not ever a "team". This ended with feminism.
/r/MensRights11/03/22 01:07 AM
1

That is because most men are raised from a toxic position of a mother that raises her son not as a person, but as a tool for his future female partner. Which is a standard way of any woman raising her sons, unfortunately.
/r/MensRights11/03/22 01:04 AM
2

And this, here, is exact problem. "Does provide", "not all he's good for". WTF. Is he some sort of your tool to use? Misandrist is who you are, OP.
/r/MensRights11/03/22 12:57 AM
1

In other words, did you just thank your hubby for being a human doing, instead ofnappreciating Him as a human BEING? Sad.
/r/MensRights11/03/22 12:54 AM
1

Tbh, if I have a good job, why would I ever date a woman who does not have one? Im looking for an equal partner, not a dependopotamus. Equal partnership includes equal socioeconomic position. Not just potential thereof. Actual position. No, not "some day". Now as much as in the future, without fail. And the more serious that relation would be, the higher my expectations will be. Why? Because im not going to allow someone into my life just so that someone treats me as an ATM.
/r/MensRights11/03/22 12:40 AM
2

You know, thats something you really should NOT use as a derogatory term against someone. Like ever.
/r/MensRights11/03/22 12:32 AM
3

Shame thwt in practice, it always only goes one way, as anything really. Budgeting, decisikns, feelings - female life is self-oriented and self-centered.
/r/MensRights11/03/22 12:12 AM
7

In other words - did she just say that men are not able to deal with things and communicate, without external help? Dude. Run. Fucking red flag.
/r/MensRights11/03/22 12:10 AM
-2

He owes her nothing, either way. His money is for his kid, then for him, and thats it. She should be working, like any adult.
/r/MensRights10/03/22 11:53 PM
1

Cool. Once I see any real results of women being fair towards us - and I mean results of actions, not writing nice words on the internet - we might have something to actually think about reciprocating, imo. And we both know that will not happen :)
/r/MensRights04/03/22 10:15 PM
1

Diplomacy 101, rule of equal response. That and realpolitik. The rest - when its useful for us.
/r/MensRights04/03/22 07:16 PM
6

We didnt start all this.
/r/MensRights04/03/22 03:38 PM
7

Once you get rid of your extremists, we can talk.
/r/MensRights04/03/22 01:50 PM
54

Women CAN do it IF they CHOOSE to do so, men MUST do it, or face harsh penalties. See the difference?
/r/MensRights02/03/22 04:12 PM
20

He does what he has to do to keep the country from being overrun. Shame that most women are worthless and just gtfo instead of doing their part. Should loose all citizenship rights for such betrayal, tbh.
/r/MensRights02/03/22 04:11 PM
4

ya, how dare we to have an actual ambitions and goals. bad bad men... /s
/r/MensRights02/03/22 04:06 PM
91

Red flag number one: female entitlement.
/r/MensRights01/03/22 03:04 PM
1

If you dont trust someone, you really would choose / allow that person to fix your issues / problems? Person that cannot inherently understand them, and never had to actually live them? Suit yourself. Im not an idiot of that calibre. Resolving our issues should be under our total unilateral control of narrative regarding and surrounding those issues, and she cannot guarantee that. How can she give platform to a man to speak? Have him speak, be there with him, and validate and defend HIS words. W…
/r/MensRights23/02/22 10:00 PM
1

Laws can be changed, even in quite extreme ways. Feminism has proven that to be true and possible.
/r/MensRights23/02/22 02:04 PM
3

It obly matters if our image was incorrect. If feminists have their image smeared, that tbh is just profitable to us. We would do ourselves a disservice by stopping that, really. Politics 101.
/r/MensRights23/02/22 01:03 PM
2

I dont have an exwife. However you might want to understand that we men stand together. Which means I also care if another man gets fucked over by the system. Strange, eh? Your problem, and the problem of the system, is not being willing to take into account the fact that if she stays at home, then that man MUST work for two of them. Otherwise, they'll end up homeless. And then, it will, of course, be HIS fault again, for not providing enough money. And its he thwt will have shit and shame poure…
/r/MensRights23/02/22 12:57 PM
1

Better to be yourself and be mediocre, than to SEEM to look good, tbh. Being real, being one's true self, and being comfortable with yourself in all that - this is being an adult.
/r/MensRights23/02/22 01:36 AM
2

Money runs the world, and keeps roof over your head. We have same exact right to time with the child, and women should start taking that into account. Working with them? You mean same women that will fuck us over when its profitable for them to do so? Let me guess, you are another local feminist, pretending to be the good one? XD
/r/MensRights23/02/22 01:33 AM
2

Or an "improper relationship", lol.
/r/MensRights23/02/22 01:29 AM
0

The problem being, she is a she. Not one of us by definition, therefore cannot be verified not to be acting out of self-interest instead of on our behalf. Thus, cannot be trusted. Thats one. Two, she is a she. Therefore, as not one of us by definition, cannot be trusted not to skew the narrative in favour of women. Even if she speaks about a compromise, chances are it will be favourable to women, on our expense, in some way. Which is not something id be willing to accept. Three, she is not a man…
/r/MensRights23/02/22 01:18 AM
1

This. This is exactly why SAHMs / stay-at-home-partners should never be even remotelly accepted by men. She must always, without fail, do her part in every way. Otherwise we must treat her as a worst kind of parasite. Why? Because this is how we will universally be treated by her. Even if indirectly/silently.
/r/MensRights23/02/22 12:33 AM
1

He is still a father, and has inherent right to time with HIS child. Stop treating men like ATMs.
/r/MensRights23/02/22 12:24 AM
1

Well now the daddy will be primary care giver, and mommy will gtfo and accept that she is no longer needed. She now can see the kid an hour per week, supervised, and provide enough of her money - so that the father and HIS child can build proper relation, that tbey are both simply entitled to. Its for the good of the child, after all. And if she fails for any reason, jail her without mercy. This is how it should work.
/r/MensRights23/02/22 12:23 AM
0

And again, a woman talking on topics that she should listen instead.
/r/MensRights22/02/22 11:59 PM
31

You matter, no matter what people say.
/r/MensRights22/02/22 11:49 PM
36

Biased channel is biased
/r/MensRights22/02/22 10:55 PM
2

So, again - why it is always us men that are to "man up" and "grow up"?
/r/MensRights21/02/22 01:52 PM
2

Truth trumps all. Is she cant handle it, she needs to grow up. If she has a problem with it, then she must speak with the one who was a root cause - mother, instead ofbshooting the messenger - father. And no, its not his kid if he didnt consent. Its just you who says it should be so, but this, like laws, can be fixed in society.
/r/MensRights21/02/22 11:57 AM
1

Women are LEGALLY ALLOWED to be selfish, tho. Why cant we?
/r/MensRights21/02/22 07:45 AM
3

Oh, we can handle it. You handle it by finding a woman that is not full of double standards.
/r/MensRights21/02/22 02:58 AM
2

Yeeeah, OP, find a woman who is better than that.
/r/MensRights21/02/22 02:57 AM
7

He's not a deadbeat if he never consented to being a father.
/r/MensRights21/02/22 02:54 AM
1

Because father has no right to not feel ok with what was done to him. Because you say so. Fuck off. He didnt consent to having a kid, therefore his needs outweight that kid's feels. Girlie can go talk to mommy as to why she fucked up so badly that her kid now pays consequences. We dont have ano obligations towards anyone if we didnt consent to those obligations.
/r/MensRights21/02/22 02:52 AM
3

The message should be "belive the victim if he says he is one".
/r/MensRights21/02/22 02:46 AM
3

Nope. She should know full truth, if only so that she can decide wheter or not she wants to keep such fucked up person as that mommy, in her life. Mother is not above everything, or anything. And must pay.
/r/MensRights21/02/22 02:45 AM
1

And why women are to be prioritised? Men sacrificed and compromosed for generations. Enough is enough. We are not a team anymore.
/r/MensRights19/02/22 12:33 AM
1

So, any actual evidence that you can provide that it IS made up? If not, gtfo.
/r/MensRights18/02/22 01:44 PM
0

Egocentrism is real
/r/MensRights18/02/22 01:12 PM
0

And why would we prioritise women over our basic needs? Not our issues, really. And we dont exist to compromise or sacrifice. "apropriate clothes"? Who are you to tell us what to wear when? She can wear proper clothes you know, too. Ones that will not make her so cold.
/r/MensRights18/02/22 01:04 PM
0

REALITY IS SEXIST REEEEE, lmao XD Obvious /s is obvious, but id not be surprised when any feminist goes that route.
/r/MensRights18/02/22 01:03 PM
1

Problem being, they are talking about our issues instead of listening to US about OUR issues. Who gave them that right, exactly?
/r/MensRights18/02/22 12:48 PM
1

Feminism wants to break and remove gender norms FOR WOMEN. Just women. Cant have human ATMs not servicing them...
/r/MensRights18/02/22 12:38 PM
5

Which is a problem, exactly. We must prioritiee ourselves and our group. Just like feminists did and do still. If we dont care for ourselves, noone will.
/r/MensRights18/02/22 12:32 PM
1

Unfortunate or notz if we can make an example out of her, we always should make an example out of her. This is just how one should deal with such people.
/r/MensRights18/02/22 01:36 AM
2

Using us as her tool is not advocacy. Its still misandry.
/r/MensRights18/02/22 01:30 AM
1

Its about time....for women like her to stop talking and throwing their opinions, and instead shut up, listen to us about ua, and do as told on our matters. She is not of our group, so she has no right to have her own opinion on our matters.
/r/MensRights18/02/22 01:29 AM
2

More like, acknowledging that they have worthless, self-centered, toxic partners. Standard feminity is just toxicity.
/r/MensRights18/02/22 01:25 AM
2

I mean that I find thrm wasting a lot of time. Tricky to kick them out too, for various reasons. And more than one that got employed, a month later dropped "im pregnant, ciao" spiel, and now Ive got few spots that I can only fill with aubstitution / temporary contract (employee protection...) ...which means those are empty, blocked slots, since noone in this work line wants temporary positions at this level. Empty for 8+ months of pregnancy, and then up to two fucking years of mommy/baby time. T…
/r/MensRights17/02/22 12:36 AM
11

No. Im only hiring the best possible. What I pay is not the driving factor in company profit margin, really. How much gets done for the client - is. So what if I pay her 30k instead of 40k, if I know that she will not pull her weight? Im at a loss. And im not exactly running a company to be on a loss. Im not charity. I dont live off tax money.
/r/MensRights16/02/22 01:33 PM
8

What "talent"? Talent is measured in her effectiveness, in how much she has done, in her work metrics. Not her nice unverified words in a cv.
/r/MensRights16/02/22 01:30 PM
25

Let me guess...you never worked any job that had time sheets for tasks, right? Protip: if someone needs 1 hour to do what takes you two hours, he gets more tasks done in same time. If they, additionally, stay overtime, and do even more tasks, they have even more work done logged. Not just logged time. Work verified as completed in said time. If she is crying in the kitchenz she is not doing work. Work is not done, and that time will not be billed. And she will earn less as a result. Welcome to r…
/r/MensRights16/02/22 01:29 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter