TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

InconspicuousAlt Archive

View 0 posts and 38 comments by InconspicuousAlt on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

It's not absurd, simply poorly executed. Abundance mentality. Proper escalation. Not seeming batshit crazy. All of these are good ideas. It's not a good idea, poorly executed. If some girl lends me a textbook, I'm not going to go buy the flowers and dress up in a tux. Yes, the goal is to stand out, but no, the goal is not to stand out as a crazy person. You try that hard, you've lost.
/r/seduction04/11/11 06:57 AM
2

How do you know the author is an AFC? Though the article itself isn't very good simply because it's completely obvious. Certainly something an (r)AFC could regurgitate, no problem.
/r/seduction28/10/11 04:52 AM
2

Allow me to clarify what I meant. It reduces your risk in the same way that playing Russian Roulette only once reduces your risk of dying. That is to say, the artificial odds of you getting an STD if you only have one partner ever are very low. But the odds that any given partner has an STD are pretty consistent. Monogamy isn't a fucking solution for STDs. (Plus, someone who has 20 partners over 10 years, but not at the same time, has a better overall chance of getting an STD than someone who ha…
/r/seduction05/08/11 05:31 AM
2

Every time I ever read anything about stds, the first thought in my mind is "Monogamy!" This is wrong. The first thought in your head should be "Abstinence!" No, I'm not kidding--the only 100% effective way of not getting an STD via sex (some STDs can be transfered via things other than sexual contact) is to not have sex. Now, 99% of the time being well educated on STDs will help you avoid STDs. I just wanted to make it clear that only having one partner at a time does not reduce your risk of ge…
/r/seduction04/08/11 06:11 AM
3

He makes it sound like he's more into it than she is--I would think that at this point just dropping off communication is a better call than sending anything final-sounding. Further, since you weren't mutually exclusive from the sounds of thing, there's no reason you actually have to end things "officially" to move on. Hell, you can keep meeting other girls even before you were ready to move on from this one :)
/r/seduction21/07/11 05:59 AM
7

Don't. The fantasy you have isn't worth the potential downfalls you could face. Coworkers and especially managers are in a position where you could be fired, sued, or both for trying anything. Even if that doesn't happen, word will get around and you'll eventually feel uncomfortable around the office. To clarify: those are possibilities regardless of whether or not you succeed. Just because you sleep with her in the end doesn't mean things can't turn sour, especially if she turns out to be crazy…
/r/seduction21/07/11 05:54 AM
10

Congratulations! It's OK to be Takei!
/r/seduction21/07/11 05:49 AM
1

I disagree. You need to change how you behave but not necessarily who you are. There's a reason that you can't just look at a list of one-liners and conversational topics and things to say and be off on your way to mPUAdom. Be yourself is worthless advice because it's cliched and non-specific, but not because it's wrong. The stuff lilninjalee listed seems to center around these guys acting different if they see hot girls around. the first thing they should change is complaining Yes, absolutely. …
/r/seduction15/07/11 06:33 AM
11

Agreed. And isn't everything a "trick" of some sort? I see what sirolf is trying to get at about this being more deceitful, but we call it game for a reason EDIT: Also, since everyone has a different definition of moral, I'm interested in what sirolf's is. Is it moral to learn about what makes girls attracted to guys for the purpose of having sex? Is it dishonest to accentuate the parts of your personality and appearance that are the most flattering? This might be an outright lie of sorts, but i…
/r/seduction05/07/11 05:40 AM
16

Everybody's gotta start somewhere. Making friends isn't that difficult, and assuming you can avoid oneitis, staying friends with a girl you failed with is usually an excellent idea too. Though this is from someone who makes friends naturally (though I sucked at seduction). So I don't know, I understand it might be difficult for some people, but I think it's not that huge of a vicious cycle. I agree with Lojak that the most lethal thing about this technique is the attitude development issues (it …
/r/seduction05/07/11 05:38 AM
3

i have made alot of progress over the past 6 months, alot. He's dictating his story to an alot. I understand completely. Alots are very sensitive and understanding creatures, and it can be very useful to talk to them about your feelings. I use this alot.
/r/seduction05/07/11 05:32 AM
2

Write a field report on seddit every week, or failing that, at least make yourself a promise to actually go out and game every opportunity you get. It sounds like you're reading a lot, which isn't bad but isn't going to do anything by itself; you absolutely need to go out. Oneitus, continued affection for exes, and the like can all be broken off by successes in the field.
/r/seduction05/07/11 05:30 AM
2

This is great advice. A few things I've noticed is that using a story relevant to the conversation is helpful for a lot of reasons; most notably, by finding the right time to interject a story, you also find the right stories to interject. I've used stuff I would have never in a million years imagined using (try "where I was on 9/11" on for size). Also, use fake names for sure. There are a couple of good reasons for this. It maintains privacy for any friends who might not have wanted the story t…
/r/seduction05/07/11 05:22 AM
1

Do it. You're already late, you should have approached her the first time you saw her. Don't worry about the "window", if things go bad there are tons of other people. Actually, the limited window might be an upside--if things go horribly wrong, you never have to see her again. Oh, except don't approach co-workers. Sexual harassment claims wouldn't be worth it if things go wrong, and either way it's kind of creepy (girls usually don't want to be hit on in a work environment). Not that you can't …
/r/seduction01/07/11 06:47 AM
2

Either this is a case of one-itis, or the guy is just asking "how do I approach women." In the first (which, as described, is what it sounds like), the best advice and only real advice is "don't have one-itis" (or, as put by l3fth4nd, approach lots of women). In the second, there's all the sidebar stuff to help. OP: You've broken the three second rule here. You're thinking about approaching one girl for far too long for it to go very well. I'm not trying to crush your spirits--I've broken the th…
/r/seduction01/07/11 06:42 AM
3

Isn't this more a relationship line than a pickup reaction test? Not saying they aren't related (har har) but you have something much more situational than a common shit test here, hard to respond to.
/r/seduction01/07/11 06:25 AM
1

By making it clear you're not actually judging what they asked you to judge, you make it so it doesn't really matter. If they know you mean "temperature-wise" then picking either one of them does't make a huge difference, and ASA is right about the benefits of continued joking.
/r/seduction01/07/11 06:23 AM
10

I dunno, that sounds to me to be kinda beta (maybe it's just that I have friends who are the kind of people who use "I'm looking for a girl with a good personality" as an excuse to not even talk to pretty girls because they're afraid), but I guess it depends on delivery.
/r/seduction01/07/11 06:19 AM
1

The fact that there's no way she hasn't heard it before, combined with her responding positively to it (ie pretending to find it hilarious) is probably a good sign. I agree with AnotherSedditAccount that it's kind of cringe worthy to use the same pun twice, though.
/r/seduction28/06/11 05:02 AM
1

Psychology is inherently interesting to a lot of people, which can be helpful. I actually considered listing it as a possible exception in "advantages" just because I know a lot of people interested in it, and I've used stuff I learned in 300-level psych classes (which I took for fun, not cause they were required) in conversations a lot.
/r/seduction20/05/11 08:52 PM
1

Often true (but not in every case). It is always true that you can (and should) be happy if you don't end up with someone--that just means they weren't right for you. It is not always true that you can't be happy ending up with someone though.
/r/seduction20/05/11 04:29 PM
2

This probably belongs in askseddit, but what everyone else here said is right. I'm a college student in mathematics and computer science. 90% of the people who aren't in my major(s) or classes that I talk to wouldn't understand 90% of the questions on my homework assignments. That does not ever mean I can't make what I do sound fascinating and draw someone in and interest them. If you think what you're doing is cool, and you act like it is, everyone else will to. I can't think of a single major …
/r/seduction20/05/11 07:07 AM
5

500 Days of Summer gets recommended a lot, and with good reason--it's probably the only movie classified as a "romantic comedy" (or at least one of the few) that I've truly enjoyed, and it's rare to see a movie which doesn't end with the guy getting the girl and the usual "everyone lived happily ever after."
/r/seduction20/05/11 06:59 AM
1

The SNL parody is also a pretty damn good Alec Baldwin moment: http://www.hulu.com/watch/3362/saturday-night-live-glengarry-glen-christmas
/r/seduction20/05/11 06:47 AM
1

Easy enough. Tl;dr: Use pickup to get women, not just to do pickup for pickup's sake, and don't worry about what other people think or that you might be doing it wrong if what you're doing works. Nothing novel as far as I'm concerned. Then again, I haven't met a lot of people who were "in pickup for pickup's sake."
/r/seduction18/05/11 06:14 PM
1

Lots of people have said lots of helpful stuff, so I have nothing of substance to add. I just wanted to say that when I read your blog URL it looked to me like "You can't love email" and I was confused as hell until I clicked.
/r/seduction18/05/11 05:48 PM
3

Just wanted to point this out-OP is the post author, he's the one you're responding to.
/r/seduction18/05/11 05:42 PM
14

Exactly. Here's a few key points to differentiate: 1) Do other people (especially guys and girls you aren't trying to sleep with) call you a nice guy on a regular basis, or would it be something they might list as a descriptive trait (but not the only trait they would list)? 2) Think about actions you define as nice, or things you do that you think make you a nice guy. Have you done these actions proportionally equally (or approximately equally) to everyone you know? In other words, are you not …
/r/seduction17/05/11 06:19 PM
1

Oneitis is an issue any time you're so focused on a single person that you stop thinking rationally and that lack of rational thinking causes you problems. As in this case, it doesn't have to be an abusive or shitty relationship to be a problematic one. Love is a fun word that teenagers like to use to describe the ecstasy of emotions from their first serious relationship. Remember those feelings? Yes, they were awesome, but they were never worth risking your future over. Like anyone else, he is …
/r/seduction16/05/11 05:17 PM
1

My basic answer to your question of why would have been this: "Would you, out of the blue, offer to buy me a drink if you didn't even know me, assuming you had no sexual interest in me?" You claim the answer to that question is yes. If so, then you might be less off-base than most guys who buy girls drink (by having different behavior towards people they are sexually interested in, they aren't being nice). However, I still would be cautious--I'd be surprised if your behavior isn't different towa…
/r/seduction29/04/11 09:20 AM
1

It's really not that complicated. Ask yourself, if she were a guy (or otherwise someone you aren't interested in except platonicly) and you were in a similar situation, would you buy that guy a drink? Random dude you just met in a bar? No. Close friend you've known for a while? Probably fine. During a fascinating conversation with someone you just met half an hour ago but are really connecting with? Maybe. Buying girls drinks doesn't get you anywhere. It doesn't make you stand out (everyone else…
/r/seduction29/04/11 09:06 AM
1

You're spending every second of your life being the best computer scientist in the world, and yet you have enough time to browse reddit and post comments about how unfortunate your lack of social skills is? Dude, just go out and try stuff. It's not something you need to devote your whole life to. I might not be in the top 100 computer scientists in the world (at least, I'm not enough of a pretentious douchebag to make a claim like that), but I can tell you there are girls who will be impressed t…
/r/seduction24/04/11 07:41 AM
2

I think you are bitter that you don't have game, and applying it to "oh, girls don't like me because I'm a scientist." This makes no sense. At all. What you do doesn't matter--the passion you have for it and your ability to make it sound interesting matters. If you love your job or chosen field, your game gets way better (assuming you know how to talk about it without coming off like an elitist, jackass, or loser--that takes a bit of work but it's not hard. Trust me on this: any girl who actuall…
/r/seduction23/04/11 10:12 PM
2

There is a crucial difference between introversion and shyness that I think a lot of people are missing. YeOldeThrowaway has it right; it's all about preferred activities. I'm an extroverted STEM student and I know a lot of other STEM students who are extroverted. The whole "we won't have any scientists or engineers" thing that reph was talking about is completely stupid not only because it incorrectly assumes that STEM people can't seduce women or reproduce but also because it assumes that scie…
/r/seduction23/04/11 10:36 AM
1

If you want further support for this, I actually know quite a few girls who go on reddit and not a single one who ever browses r/seduction. This community isn't exactly where most girls (if any) spend their time.
/r/seduction22/03/11 08:13 PM
9

Dunno why you got downvoted. Sure, the video was funny and a pretty damn good pick-up, but it's very clearly set up (at least with the guy; the girls might have genuinely been random girls, it's a bit harder to tell). There's multiple camera angles (which means either multiple cameras or multiple takes), they stay steady and they are edited pretty professionally, and the guy has a mike on (hence why his voice is clearer than anyone else's). And of course there's the URL. Even if that was thrown …
/r/seduction28/01/11 07:24 AM
6

Not to mention that one of the big reasons to avoid the "buy you a drink" line is that it's become a social expectation, and some (not all or even most, but some) girls exploit this to their advantage. It's not something that should completely repulse you every time you hear it. It's something that should be avoided usually because at worst it's an expensive way to wind up nowhere and at best it's still a pretty unoriginal and unfunny line. There's no way you can say this guy was unoriginal. He …
/r/seduction28/01/11 07:19 AM
1

Same here in the perfect score. Knowing to look at the eyes helps a lot; I think I can feel the emotion given off by the real smiles much easier too. None of the fake smilers looked like they were genuinely laughing/enjoying themselves.
/r/seduction13/01/11 09:27 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter