TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Inevitable-Dog9120 Archive

View 0 posts and 32 comments by Inevitable-Dog9120 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Have you heard of this thing called "anecdotes"?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/23 05:14 AM
1

Why develop a criminal justice system, legal processes and principles over millennia when we could have just had unhinged women be the arbiters of justice this whole time?!?!
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/23 09:58 PM
1

Those stats are kind of meaningless. We don’t really know what % of that 8% and 25% are divorced aged-50+ individuals. I would imagine that they make up the large majority of that number.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/23 05:12 AM
1

On what basis are making the declaration that people with empathy "are healthy" and that those without it are not? That seems pretty ad hoc and unjustified. I don't know if you noticed within your reasoning but it is circular. You're saying that the world has morality therefore morality is. That doesn't explain why morality is and why it ought to be the way in which society has arrived at it being. What I'm saying is nuanced. I'm not making the claim that you can't have morality while being an a…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/23 05:53 PM
1

You have no basis for actually KNOWING WHY something is wrong. Nor do you have a basis for knowing why something is wrong. All you have is sense data in your worldview. You can't get an "ought" (universal morality, metaphysical) from what is (your sense data). ​ I'm not making the argument that my morality is superior to yours, though I believe that to be true. I'm making the argument that my worldview and my explanation for morality within in it is coherent and properly grounded and that in you…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/23 05:32 PM
1

On what basis can you say that "morality is grounded in cooperation"? Who says that we ought not to go extinct? There are plenty of atheists that make a compelling moral argument for the depopulation of humanity. On what basis would you be able to say that they are wrong objectively? You're trying to make an argument that things "ought to be this way" because "things are this way" which is logically invalid.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/23 05:14 PM
1

Saying that something "is obvious" is not a justification for WHY it is
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/23 05:08 PM
1

But why ought people avoid harming other people? Why ought we work together as a society? These things are not established from just "sense data", these are universal claims that have to be justified somehow and just telling a story about how society would collapse without your morality presupposes that we as humans ought to live in a society as well as many other built in and unjustified presuppositions. ​ I am an Orthodox Christian. We believe in the Holy Trinity. We believe that God's "energi…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/23 05:53 AM
1

Yes, I understand what you THINK is morality, but why do you think that your conception of morality is that actual TRUE MORALITY?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/23 04:38 AM
–

So, if you derive morality from your own individual sense data then it is impossible for you to apply it universally. If morality just comes from each of our own individual brains then we are necessarily relativists, that is, there is no such thing as universal morality--it is localized. We are unable to say, then, WHY another person OUGHT to follow the sense of morality that comes from OUR own personal sense data. ​ There is no logical way to go from "my brain tells me this is morality" to "the…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/23 04:26 AM
–

You don't know even know how ignorant you sound. On what basis are you able to make that statement about what is and isn't moral? I am not asking "what is morality", I am asking WHERE that morality comes from and what it is grounded in.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/23 02:57 AM
–

How do you get objective and universal morality from YOUR OWN sense data? Edit: In addition, how are you able to justify the position of morality being "The basis of morality is not causing harm to others if it can be avoided"?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/23 02:42 AM
–

How are you able to say any of that is immoral? Where do you get a sense of what is "wrong" and what is "right"?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/23 02:04 AM
–

You've completely ignored what I wrote or are incapable of understanding what I wrote. On what basis are you able to say that morality "is obvious"? Where does it come from?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/23 02:02 AM
–

And? Your atheist paradigm is incapable of grounding morality. So, therefore, if you're logically consistent in your worldview, you're actually unable to condemn any aspect of Christianity as "immoral" because you're unable to say, in a universal moral sense, what is "right" and what is "wrong".
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/23 01:14 AM
–

Modern women are superficial and lack morals. Modern men are superficial and lack morals. Magically, when we move away from God as a society and embrace self-worship and nihilism we become morally corrupted. Who would have guessed?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/23 11:52 PM
–

I'm confused about what your point is. I was just attacking your use of the word misogyny in an ambiguous way.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/23 11:22 PM
–

What do we even define as misogyny? Do we define it as a voicing of discontent/dislike for the current state of women? Or are we defining it as something else that is more extreme and linked more intrinsically to the "essence" of what women are? You can be critical of the attributes that modernity has adorned women with without actually hating women.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/23 10:48 PM
1

The reason you need two incomes in the United States is BECAUSE women joined the workforce. It's a vicious cycle. ​ You're also assuming that you NEED to make a boatload of money in order to support a family with one income. That just is not the case. There are plenty of families, particularly Christians, that have SAHM's with relatively average incomes. They just don't live fancy, sexy lifestyles. They aren't buying expensive clothes, going on vacations, or eating at restaurants. It can be done…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/23 10:16 PM
2

"easier" is a relative term
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/23 10:04 PM
8

Is there any further granularity on these for people remarrying in their 40s, 50s, 60s? I would imagine that a huge amount of the people in that 18.8% are actually remarried people later in life. It seems much more common to find a divorced 50-year-old woman remarrying a 60-year-old man than a 28-year-old woman marrying a 38-year-old man.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/23 04:06 PM
3

Presuppose: the world is burning Presuppose: that individuals actually have the ability to affect change within the system you say has flaws Presuppose: that individuals that aren’t engaging with the system can’t affect change within the system Presuppose: that not doing anything is being complicit Assert without evidence: traditional men will oppose ethics There are so many problems with your argument that it can’t even get off the ground
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/23 06:27 PM
9

Your conclusion is a total non sequitur. It’s makes no logical sense. You basically spit out a bunch of anti-capitalist nonsense and then said “therefore trad wives are unethical”. At least have the decency to read over your post and make sure you’re making a coherent argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/23 05:39 PM
3

They’re religious. I like them.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/23 08:23 PM
1

Like 70% of the population in America identify as some sort of religion. Like about 1/3rd of them never go to church, 1/3rd go on special occasions, and 1/3rd go weekly/frequently. So like 30-40% of all women probably wouldn’t be down with dating a guy who has a high body count or isn’t sexually disciplined. I’ve never understood the Red Pill refusing to accept the idea that a woman can have morals and ethics that she believes in/lives by.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/23 10:00 PM
-4

Have you people not read the Bible?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/23 09:52 PM
1

I’m pretty sure it’s illegal to say anything under 18
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/23 09:48 PM
6

None of your premises connect back to your initial claim that women don't have it easier
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/23 09:57 PM
6

"9 million seems a little inflated doesn't it?"
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/23 09:10 PM
2

The "misunderstanding" between genders is more of a side effect of a larger societal-wide battle between ideologies and world views. The actual conflict is just conservative vs liberal. The caveat is that ideology has become pretty correlated between the two genders with men being more conservative and women more liberal. A conservative woman and a conservative man would get along almost flawlessly; likewise, a liberal man and a liberal woman would have little to quarrel about when it comes to r…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/23 09:26 PM
–

This may sound elitist, but the vast majority of the poor, obese demographic are segregated from the rest of society largely. They live a lot of the time in tight knit neighborhoods like trailer parks and ghettos. As a result, these “poor, obese” people don’t actually have troubles finding partners. The men that are actually struggling in the dating market are your working and middle class types. Particularly your moderately conservative, non-religious types. I don’t have any data to substantiat…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/23 06:10 AM
1

Can confirm. I’m a 6’6, broad shouldered, green eyed, attractive guy (my lack of self confidence made that extremely painful to write) yet I’m 21 and have never so much as held hands with a girl. Granted, I’m too shy to ever even talk to girls and avoid all things social. But, this idea that just because you’re attractive it means that girls simply fall in your lap is laughable.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/23 05:56 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter