That's not what the article is saying. Please read it again. I award you a D- for your effort. Needs significant improvement on comprehension. A review of 400 incidents of violence among couples by Marianne Hester of the University of Bristol found that about half of men recorded by the police as victims were named as perpetrators in other incidents involving the same partner. Emphasis, mine. It's saying that the police view it as that way. The police are the ones that assume that the men are th…
No, we should be confronting them more in a respectable way. We should not be tolerating their ignorance. The longer we let them brew in their echo chamber, the worse it'll get.
It's not feminist thinking (although some feminists amplify), it's culturally and instinctively ingrained in all of us. We have to overcome our primal instincts to make rational decisions.
This story is obviously not one of the fabricated ones. I'm just saying that some of them could be. It's not just as easy as companies having to deal with it. What if your HR department is one person and they don't believe you, or if they are a part of it?
There's a higher-than-normal amount of people with a persecution complex in this subreddit, but that doesn't mean that their experiences aren't valid. It's possible that some of these stories are fabricated to fuel this persecution complex. It's also possible that there's underreporting of sexual harassment against men because of a social stigma or because they think they won't be taken seriously. The solution is simultaneously easy and extremely difficult. Don't be a dick. Another solution woul…
Sources or fake and gay. much the way feminists vilify men and masculinity. And exactly the same way that incels villify women. It goes both ways, dumbass. The only difference is that both white men and white women demonized blacks. Edit: Oh look, the downvoting (and upvoting) bots have arrived!
Oh shut the fuck up dude. Men aren't nearly persecuted as blacks were. Sure, some women take advantage of a sexist system, but not nearly in the numbers, or in the same way that you're exaggerating.
Bro, you need to calm the fuck down. I never said I'd let a woman talk over me, especially if she's being disrespectful. Just because some of them are ignorant of men's issues doen't mean that we should treat them, or all women, as subordinates. We should seek to educate them in a respectful manner. That would reflect well on the MRA group, and be better for everyone. Ironically, your comment was the most NPC thing I've read today. How cliche.
The deserve to be treated like anyone should be treated. Just because they're ignorant doesn't mean that they don't deserve what everyone should deserve.
I don't think there's anything wrong with that. I think people are just upset that those same women sometimes claim victim status. Honestly, this would be ideal for a lot of people, and in my opinion, society as a whole.
As if evolution cares what you think our species ought to be. They make babies. That's all that matters to evolution. Social Darwinism has been debunked as pseudo science. In a society where it rewards people for acting like psychopaths, psychopaths will be selected for. That's natural selection. Maybe we chould change society, and it'll select for individuals that promote growth and prosperity.
