TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Infinite_Street6298 Archive

View 0 posts and 87 comments by Infinite_Street6298 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

What this whole thing should actually demonstrate is the fact that idpol has brainwashed women to by default view men as dangerous enemies is an absolute tragedy and cultural failing. This shit is basically the modern version of the moral panics surrounding black men in the civil rights era (and now, still).
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 10:49 PM
2

Ah yes I forgot all men are the exact same size and strength as one another 🤣.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 10:47 PM
1

Ya, that's a healthy, socially well adjusted way to view people. I have another question for you: why does everyone who subscribes to radical feminism or identity politics have obvious Cluster B personality traits?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 09:56 PM
1

You're ignoring the fact that a bear is like 20X stronger than you whereas a man might only be like 0.5-2X stronger than you depending on your stature. You have way higher chances of actually surviving a violent encounter with a man and fending him off vs a fuckin bear. Like if anything this whole thing has demonstrated how little respect people have for the power of wild animals.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 09:54 PM
1

Yeah you wouldn't, because it would destroy your point entirely. Macro level statistics like that don't account for the immediate danger of a specific scenario. Your argument would be like saying it's not dangerous to jump directly into shark infested water with an open wound because statistically sharks barely kill anyone. One of the reasons sharks barely kill anyone is because we DON'T jump into shark infested waters with open wounds. You can't just look at data, you have to attempt to think, …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 09:50 PM
2

Personally I think the best thing men can do in response to radfem and idpol is to simply detach and form meaningful positive relationships with other men. Here's a funny thing though: notice how all male dominated spaces are constantly being invaded by women/idpol? What does that tell you about their priorities when it comes to men actually wanting positive, supportive relationships with anyone?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 09:44 PM
0

Yeah, you'd love that type of self-flagellation and demoralization, wouldn't you? Textbook narc manipulation tactics. Did you ever stop and think that maybe there are tons of us men out here busting our ass, working hard, trying to be good people (to other men and women), trying to do the right thing, and then we come across a bunch of snarky misandrists saying they'd rather run into a bear in the forest than us? I'm sure that wouldn't cause a highly negative and hurtful reaction, lol. But posts…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 09:39 PM
4

Aside from the misandrist crap, these responses genuinely make me afraid for how drastically out of touch with common sense apparently many women are. Watch this video and then honestly tell me you'd rather have this encounter vs a random man approaching you.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 09:38 PM
3

Sure, I agree with that, I just also think it's a very convenient tool for neolibs because they can quickly and easily capitalize on it, as we see happening in many different industries. I just think it's way too coincidental that a lot of identity politics stuff starting ramping up very soon after the rise of neoliberalism. It's all connected with rampant consumerism, hyper-individualism, etc, all of which are at the very least influenced by neoliberal policies and attitudes. Otherwise I also f…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/05/24 09:25 PM
1

Wonder if their lack of a "social sphere" could be because of....hmm....the extreme prevalence of divisive identity politics overwhelmingly aimed at denigrating and demoralizing them?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 09:16 PM

The victim hood thing is because identity politics like rad feminism revolves around veneration of victimhood. If they weren’t framed as the victims they couldn’t claim to be the “good guys”, according to their own ideology. Thats why radlib types try to simultaneously assert themselves as intellectually, morally, and sometimes even physically superior people while also being weak, innocent victims and oppressed. It’s an ever present contradiction that’s baked into the way they think about all s…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 08:43 PM

Cluster B traits.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 08:40 PM
2

Yeah, dehumanizing and demoralizing attitudes between men and women contribute nothing to working class division 🤣. What do you think gives right wing grifters the appeal they have in the first place?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 08:38 PM
2

So in your opinion why is the modern working class extremely divided and making zero progress in improving people’s material quality of life? You seem to think identity politics plays no role. You also seem to be under the impression that the working class has budding success with relationships and procreation (it doesn’t, we now officially rely on immigration for population sustainment and growth). Pretty much everything you’re saying is either wrong or fails to address actual issues in society…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 08:29 PM
2

So women being more choosy isn’t resulting in some eugenic super society. They’re either not choosing healthy, disciplined, capable men, or they are and procreating with them. Honestly I’ve noticed in both discussions I’m having with you, you don’t really engage directly in the point being made. You just talk over it with a platitude or only mildly related point. I have to wonder, have you ever genuinely sat down and thought about anything before?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 08:15 PM
2

And here comes the sanctimonious grandstanding, haha. I know you can’t help it but you’re a textbook example of everything that’s wrong with identity politics. What you fail to understand is your divisiveness is weakening the working class and making it much easier for neoliberals to impose all these bad things you pretend to care about that. The reason you don’t understand that is because you’re conditioned to only thing in terms of platitudes and talking points, you have no ability to see thin…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 08:11 PM
2

Okay but if this was true why is society moving in the exact opposite direction you’re claiming? People are getting mentally and physically weaker and less healthy, not stronger.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 07:42 PM
2

I love that you responded this way because it perfectly illustrates how little thought you’ve actually put into your ideology. When faced with something “racist” your immediate identity politics conditioned reaction is to go off with a bunch of canned talking points you’ve memorized or saved in a document that explain racial factors with material concerns, which here’s the best part: is CORRECT and also explains EVERY major concern that leads to things like crime, anti social behavior, etc, INCL…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 07:41 PM
2

Jesus, you have no ability to dig deeper than the most superficial observations of things. “Trickle down economics?” Yeah, and what’s preventing the working class from controlling capital and changing that form of economics? Why are neolibs quick to peddle identity politics if it’s actually a threat to them? And now it’s about selecting the best “mates”? In terms of what, genetics, financial success? So you’re suggesting that women who marry losers, beta males, effeminate men etc are doing the w…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 07:17 PM
2

You’re basing your entire perspective on statistical likelihoods. How is doing the same for race any different? Or do you disagree that statistically black men are more likely to commit violent crimes than some other races. Make it black vs East Asian if you’d prefer to avoid the “white supremacy” connotations. Also nice try with your attempt to invert this and make it out to be me the one promoting harmful idpol crap lmao. I used the racial example to expose YOUR hypocritical and ill founded id…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 06:52 PM
1

The only shameless agenda at play here is the neoliberal agenda to divide and weaken the working class. Which of our perspectives do you think more directly contributes to that agenda?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 06:50 PM
6

I agree 10000% and could probably spend hours talking about this lol. But yeah, one of the more insidious elements of online progressivism and identity politics is in how it frames things as oppressed vs oppressor, which always couches the cluster b behaviors behind this veneer of weakness and victim hood. “How can I be the evil one? I’m the one who’s oppressed! I’m the one who is struggling!”. Also progressive types love to grandstand and exhibit performative empathy with token gestures, yet ar…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/05/24 06:37 PM
2

The problem is your claims don’t address the inherent issue I was addressing which was perception of men. Whether men engage in more dangerous behavior or not, we still don’t reel at the sight of a strange man the same way you apparently do. You’re trying to frame that as a survival tactic that explains the reason women are less likely to be the victims of crimes, my point is viewing it that was is highly selective and ignores all other explanations or contributing factors.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 06:20 PM
2

The point is that believing that men are so dangerous you’d prefer to “err on the side of caution” and choose a bear, is misandrist. It’s not much different than me saying I prefer to cross to the other side of the street if I see a black man approaching.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 06:16 PM
3

You’re not explaining the facts entirely, you’re cherry picking elements that exclusively suit your misandrist perspective. You didn’t even consider the possibility that even violent, evil men oftentimes have a soft spot for women, where they have a callous disregard for their fellow men.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 05:52 PM
2

What you’re doing is the misandrist version of “I’m not racist because I have a black friend”.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 05:51 PM
1

The fact that you see sharing a public space with a stranger for a moment as “forcing them to interact” is peak antisocial mindset. Good luck getting through life lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 05:50 PM
4

It’s telling that your explanation for why men suffer from violence is because men are just inherently bigger risk takers or put themselves in those positions, but no doubt you’d claim female victims of violence were just innocent victims who did nothing to increase their likelihood of being victimized. Nor do you consider that maybe men don’t victimize women as much as they do other men because they feel worse about it. There’s tons of gang members who have soft spots for women (because of thei…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 03:53 PM
1

Yeah so sanctimonious grand standing and in this case self flagellation. You really need to be questioning your own view of humanity if you think people getting off elevators because the fear of some stranger suddenly randomly assaulting you is so high.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 03:48 PM
4

Well I’m at ease with black people I know, but black strangers, that’s a whole nother story.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 03:46 PM
3

I question what “blue pill” individuals actually think empathy is or how it expresses itself. Often it’s performative with sanctimonious grandstanding and gestures in place of actually empathy.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 03:37 PM
7

So by this logic the women who would rather run into a 700 pound apex predator than a man, hate men right?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 03:09 PM
7

The thing is those men are just as capable of hurting and killing most men, and male vs male violence is far higher than male vs female violence. So why is it that men aren’t as paranoid and afraid of other men as women are?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 03:08 PM
10

I think this whole sub is drastically overthinking this bear thing. It’s just so obviously idpol misandry and rage bait. People are trying to couch it behind appeals to statistics and personal experience, which can easily be destroyed by simply rephrasing the question with a racist lean instead of a misandrist one: like “would you rather encounter an East Asian man in the woods or a black man?” The statistically and logically sound answer is Asian man but none of these virtue signalling radfems …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 03:05 PM
8

Men banter and make jokes like this about each other all the time, too. The funniest thing about women is they seem to believe all men are “in on it”, as if men don’t mistreat, hurt, or kill each other all the time. And yet, most men aren’t deathly afraid and paranoid of other men. Why do you think that is? Spoiler: because we don’t inundate ourselves in identity politics propaganda and get indoctrinated into fearing every person around us instead of breaking bread and unifying. The neoliberal e…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 03:02 PM
3

This is some very paranoid, terminally online way of viewing people and social relationships. You realized that for a human to, without any real purpose or self defence, attack and seriously harm a random innocent woman, they’d have to be presenting some Cluster B trait (usually antisocial personality disorder) and have zero empathy, which is probably less than like 1% of people, right? If men/people in general were actually as chaotic as you think our society would have collapsed centuries ago.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 02:59 PM
0

Indeed because actually being strong means you’re not a victim. Radfem venerates weakness and being oppressed as a virtue so they have to reject actual strength, attractiveness, success, etc. I suppose to be fair I should clarify that the OP specifically states women who “claim” to be feminists. I’m sure women I’ve dated have held feminist values like wanting women to be equal under the law and whatnot. But it doesn’t need to be overtly stated or emphasized. Honestly to me just about anyone who …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 02:50 PM
4

I completely agree and I think the downside of that is “conformity” doesn’t necessarily mean “unity”. You don’t often see a true sense of brotherhood/sisterhood in those environments, just people signalling correctly and following rules correctly. I think that’s one reason major companies have entertained identity politics and injected a lot of politics into various media, products, etc. you’ll notice this most often happens to male dominated spaces, and I think it’s largely to do with what your…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/05/24 02:47 PM
18

It's because radfem, radlib, and idpol in general is largely a thinly veiled excuse to mask Cluster B personality traits behind performative gestures and appeals to empathy, as well as sanctimonious grandstanding, virtue signaling, venerating weakness, etc. It's almost like a cultural version of Munchausen Syndrome where these radfems WANT to be seen as oppressed and want men to be the evil oppressors, because it's basically slave morality and that dynamic is how they get validation, attention, …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/05/24 03:42 AM
3

Women are only living in fear because they've been brainwashed by identity politics. You're just as bad as racists who see black people as violent thugs.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/05/24 03:38 AM
7

Actually amazing point, really. We should be asking men if they'd rather run into a bear or another man in the woods. 99% of men would say the other man, even though men are statistically more likely to be the victims of violent crimes at the hands of other men than women are.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/05/24 03:36 AM
9

Men are simultaneously weak babies who cry when they get a cold, can't take care of themselves, and can easily be beaten by stronk women with a kick to the balls, but are also so dangerous and scary women would rather encounter a bear in the woods than a man. They love selectively emphasizing male traits: we're only ever "strong" or "tough" when it's in the context of being abusive or criminals, never when it comes to being heroic or anything.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/05/24 03:34 AM
1

Misanthropy in general is a major cultural failing in the west.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/05/24 03:32 AM
3

Ask them if they'd prefer to be alone in the woods with a bear or a black man. This will expose their idpol hypocrisy and virtue signaling because they'll choose the black man, or just accuse you of baiting/racism (as if the original question isn't also baiting/misandry).
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/05/24 03:24 AM
17

You're overthinking it. It's just a misandrist demoralization piece, nothing more. Notice how the male responses that are positively received are the ones where the man is basically prostrating himself saying, "oh how could us terrible men have made you poor women feel this way!?!?" In reality, this is yet another symptom of idpol, causing people to divide and fight amongst each other. The elites love when people hate one another, when families are divided, when men and women resent each other, …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/05/24 03:22 AM
-1

Uh, no. I've dated plenty of "strong independent women" who weren't feminists.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 01:16 AM
13

Dunno if this will be a hot take but I honestly think a lot of women's issues with safety is just a lack of common sense. I remember in school there was a discussion about some nail polish that was meant to detect drugs in drinks, and my first thought was, "damn that's pretty smart". But most of the class and the professor were like, "BUT THEY SHOULDN'T HAVE TO USE THAT!!" I'm like uh....yeah okay, you're right. Just don't take precautionary measures ever and then do the stunned pikachu face whe…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/05/24 01:11 AM
2

That's a really good point. But the liberal side of things is far more insidious and "traitorous" imo because for proper class unification, revolution, and societal restructuring, we still need a lot of "rambunctiousness". Libs think we can just sing kumbaya or vote our way to a better world, and they prioritize idpol, venerate a lot of weak behavior, and are primarily concerned with endless validation and attention. They don't have the grit to do what the left needs to be done.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/05/24 08:30 PM
1

Not to mention they actually have attractive, feminine women. I feel like there’s this impression of passport bros that they can’t get a western woman but I think the full truth is they just can’t get the 5% of western women who are actually attractive, so they have to look elsewhere.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/24 07:17 AM
1

Yeah but the Japanese equivalent of the fat ugly white girl are not fat, ugly, or white.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/24 07:12 AM
1

It’s a requirement for getting a non-dumpster fire. When I started earning six figures suddenly a new world opened up. Go figure, high earning professional and attractive women also want high earning, professional men.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/24 07:11 AM
1

I mean at this point you’re basically obligated to passport bro if you want a woman who’s not overweight.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/24 07:10 AM
1

Yeah just like on that survivor spinoff where they separated the men and the women. I remember the women doing really really well! 🤣
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/24 07:08 AM
1

So who on the island are you going to ask for instructions?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/24 07:07 AM
1

I'd hope they don't believe that anymore after watching all the men stay behind and get shredded in trenches in Ukraine while all the hot young women immediately fled to get porked by foreigners in Europe.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/24 06:20 AM
1

Why are shitlibs always so opposed to the idea that trends in human behavior exist? We get it, you're a super special snowflake and you're not like the other girls. Congrats. 99% of humans are predictable as fuck.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/24 06:17 AM
1

Of course it's inflammatory shitlib misandry designed to rile people up and rage bait redpillers and incels. No one would have asked something like, "would you rather be in a room with a PS5 or a woman?" and if they did most men wouldn't have answered it (honestly, hehehe).
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/24 06:16 AM
1

Oh yeah, I approach women every time I go out with my buddies. I just try to banter or socialize, usually it's fine but I find women and honestly people in general post-COVID are very fucking a-social compared to what I remember. Women seem uptight or nonplussed, and most so called "social" settings near where I live are so closed off, with barely anyone actively mingling. Or maybe I'm just an ugly asshole now? Both?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/24 05:48 AM
1

It's just the halo effect. Women are naturally seen as innocent, beautiful, desirable, etc and therefore all of their positive traits are perceived as amplified and their negative traits are perceived as diminished. Men can also benefit from the halo effect but it's generally not as instantaneous as with women. Just look at how the world reacts when a cute woman is killed or goes missing vs when some disheveled homeless male war vet OD's.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/24 05:47 AM
-19

You are a weapon. You just need to be pointed at the right goals. The innate strength of a man and of masculinity is our ability to light that fire of passion in our hearts and attack problems with ferocity. That's something most women (and to be fair most modern men) simply don't have, and that's not a knock against women, we're just built differently with different hormones. One of my least favorite aspects of this shitlib desire to denigrate men and masculinity is how it neuters men's primal …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/05/24 05:44 AM
1

Imo masculinity is an obligation that I try to live up to. It's not about wanting to be "manly", it's about a sense of responsibility. If I'm physically and mentally weak, overly emotional/hysterical, unable or unwilling to learn how to do hard physical labor, unable or unwilling to use firearms, etc, then what good am I going to be when the shit hits the fan and it's time for the glorious revolution and working class uprising? Most shitlibs today couldn't even go outside for five mins without c…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/24 05:39 AM
1

This is willfully obtuse. There's zero chance anyone answering that question was actually thinking on some meta level calculating the specific odds of specific things happening. It was an obvious dig at men and a suggestion that massive apex predators are less threatening to a woman than the idea of being alone with a man. It's the most tissue paper thinly veiled radfem misandry. All you'd have to do to expose how brainlet'd this entire thing is is rephrase it to "would you rather be alone in th…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/24 05:35 AM
1

Like, most I've seen are semi-literate slouched hobgoblins wearing glorified oversized shit with "potato sack" vibes, with their entire personalities revolving around dreaming of nearest marine resort, astrology/tarot/gem shit, chugging latte, tiktok trends and %current thing% gossip. Lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/24 05:19 AM
1

The bar is really not that high (to not be poor). Obviously the bear (heh) minimum is going to school, getting decent marks, making some friends, applying for a decent paying job, saving some money, carrying yourself well and making eye contact when you talk to others, etc. [How this bullshit bootstrapper argument would sound applied to anything else]
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/24 05:18 AM
1

He said women not redditors.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/24 05:17 AM
1

It's funny how many women on reddit seem to disagree with this, but logically it follows for the simple reason: modern redditor-type women have this perception that most men are out there wanting to kidnap, harass, assault, or rape them. We know most women are not very capable of defending themselves against a man, so, wouldn't it stand to reason that women would want a strong man to protect them from all of those other dangerous men out there? So either women don't actually think men are as dan…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/24 05:11 AM
1

Yeah security guards still get paid even when no one robs a bank, though.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/24 05:08 AM
1

Hahahahahaha
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/24 05:06 AM
1

Maybe from anecdotal experience that's inverse to the anecdote you used to deny the entire premise? Like I'll never not be baffled by reddit mid-wittery, lmao.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/24 05:01 AM
1

Yeah and god forbid anything in life not be "fun" and "romantic" 100% of the time. It just wouldn't be worth the trouble if we weren't constantly being flooded with dopamine and instead actually acted out of a genuine sense of duty, loyalty, empathy, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/24 04:58 AM
1

Not overtly, but I'm also not a fan of how lacking in any sense of "duty" people are towards each other and relationships. You look at relationship subs on reddit and any time someone is complaining that their partner has any expectation or desire, everyone is like "zomg what a control freak!! Dump them immediately!!" One of my biggest issues with modern Western culture is run away individualism. No one puts their own personal wants and needs second to anything. You shouldn't feel forced or obli…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/24 04:57 AM
1

Yeah well these radfems are just bougie mini-elites living sheltered lives and working cushy white collar jobs in air conditioned offices. Of course they only see the "bad" side of male behavior because they're completely disconnected from working class men who utilize their "male" instincts and tendencies to actually do all the heavy lifting in society. It's funny how quick they are to point out the statistics regarding male violence or lack of "emotional intelligence" but they never look at th…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/24 04:47 AM
1

Extreme atomization, hyper-individualism, and fully realized neoliberal dystopia. Men MIGHT get placated by AI waifus, but I wouldn't get your hopes up. Your idea of men "fixing themselves" is actually just men giving up or becoming docile/subservient to the neoliberal elites who are fueling a lot of this shit. Andrew Tate and other right-wing reactionaries are cropping up because moderates and shitlibs have abandoned any attempt to mitigate the negative effects of the "gender war" because they …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/24 04:42 AM
2

The real problem isn't that men should be entitled to sex in a transactional or legal sense, it's that society should be built around encouraging and fostering extremely positive relationships between men and women, which naturally include sex. Modern society has instead decided to almost fully embrace radical feminism and encourage women to just abandon men altogether to frivolously pursue wage slavery to make neolibs even more rich, and when men are like, "Oh, well...what do we do? How do we g…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/24 04:36 AM
3

I've always had a hard time figuring out how supposed leftists (spoiler: they're shitlibs usually) can't at least understand and sympathize with this expression of frustration. We have mildly class conscious shitlibs who want to burn down the entire country and lynch billionaires because they're frustrated about not getting paid enough at work, but when men express even mild discontent over the challenges of modern dating, the same shitlibs will whip out the bootstrap argument and accuse the men…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/24 04:28 AM
1

Sure but the point is the woman doesn't really have to "learn" much about men in all of those experiences because the man is doing the initiating and escalation more often than not. Women just have to be there and say yes or no if they like it. Men have to figure out how to approach women, how to attract them, how to handle the dates and interactions, etc. Women don't really have to meta game a whole lot to be successful at dating, they just have to be mildly attractive and nice (if even that tb…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/24 04:25 AM
1

Personally, my only experience being frustrated with a woman not "putting out" was a woman who never escalated physicality in the relationship and always avoided or put off my attempts to do so. I sympathize with the idea of women not wanting to be treated as fleshlights, or feeling pressured to have sex within 1-3 short dates. But, you can't expect a man to be happy with committing time, energy, emotions, and money to your relationship without any physical component at all. That's called being …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/24 04:21 AM
2

More often than not people who use terms like toxic or fragile masculinity are actually the most effectively toxic/fragile people themselves. People that are constantly pushing their views on others, people who are incapable of forming meaningful relationships with others, people who can't function outside their homes for 10 mins without collapsing into a heap due to some anxiety induced panic-attack, etc. It's all a thinly veiled attempt to demonize and discourage traditional masculine values l…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/05/24 04:11 AM
1

Our society has moved away from ground up community building and tightknit groups of friends and families and has moved towards atomized hyper individualism fueled by hedonistic overconsumption, in a world where neoliberal elites are continuing to extract and siphon the vast majority of productive output into their hands at a staggering rate. And you think this is a good thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/24 04:07 AM
1

No we just rely on a steady stream of immigrants from places like that to prevent our population from freefalling. Don't wanna live in the places that are actually procreating but we don't mind siphoning human capital from them.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/24 04:05 AM
1

Because intersectionality is just common sense (if someone has multiple sources of problems, those problems will compound and make their life shittier) rebranded into some weird radlib nonsense that just confuses more than clarifies, and is often weaponized as most if not all idpol ideology is. But to really answer your question, it's because it simply does not include the one most highly relevant categorization: class. If it did, you'd see how disproportionately poor men are affected by all of …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/05/24 03:54 AM
2

Because idpol only cares about an "oppressor vs oppressed" dynamic, not genuine interests or issues between different groups of people, least of all the most important one: class. So, if men try to advocate for their own interests they're seen as "oppressors" advocating for more ways to "oppress" the downtrodden innocent victims (all women on Earth, apparently). This is why they talk over any attempt to draw attention to things that do disproportionately affect (lower class) men. In their mind t…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/05/24 03:48 AM
1

Women seem like the quintessential leftists but are in actuality one of the best tools of neoliberalism since they're the biggest consumer demographic AND more likely to oppose drastic societal restructuring (because women tend to favor stability, even if they're often political liberals/leftists they're rarely if ever revolutionaries). Forcing women into every space is not only good for shuffling men around and disrupting our ability to form meaningful relationships and share bonding experience…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/05/24 03:42 AM
1

Well, it's probably an attempt to reduce the likelihood of male bonding and male organization. Think about what would really benefit society from a left wing perspective: a unified coalition of well socialized men (and women, but mostly men if we're talking about violent revolution or something) who get along well with each other and share similar goals and aspirations. And so what would interrupt this from happening?: Disrupting male dominated spaces and ensuring that idpollers are always chast…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/05/24 03:38 AM
2

Yeah well what can you expect from idpollers? Everything in life HAS to be framed in an oppressor vs oppressed dynamic, and men are the "oppressor" so every statement has to reflect that. Not to mention the slave morality-tier veneration of weakness (physical and/or mental), which again typically suits women as women are often the "weaker" sex and more likely to be the "victims" of society, and therefore must inherently be morally superior and more worthy than any man.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/05/24 03:32 AM
9

So women have to live in ill health AND with the untimely loss of their male partner??? When will it stop!?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/05/24 03:29 AM
1

That's because a sizable portion of the left has been coopted by idpollers who view every single issue in life as "oppressor vs oppressed", and since men are "oppressors", they're automatically rendered the bad guy in all imaginable scenarios. It could be homeless male veteran with no legs vs multibillionaire woman and the man will still be the bad guy, that's how bad idpol rots brains. Try r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates, it's kind of the r/stupidpol of this topic; leftist ideology without the unadulte…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/24 03:25 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter