TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

InformalJelly Archive

View 0 posts and 37 comments by InformalJelly on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-1

Had one. You think she didn't have offers? I give up on this sub. What a bunch of wowsers and pussies. No better than Tumblr SJWs.
/r/MensRights12/10/18 10:11 AM
43

This list must have taken some time and effort to compile. While personal narratives may resonate with the crowd in this echo chamber, more rational arguments backed by citations will sway the sceptics.
/r/MensRights12/10/18 07:45 AM
3

Your thread title suggests that the YouTube link which you supplied would go to a video by Karen. The actual linked video seems to be a monologue by a man. It is not clear from the context of your link what this has to do with Karen. Is it a discussion in the YouTube comments? Normally if someone linked you to a video source, you would assume that the message was in the video content. Note that when your link is opened from the Sync app on Android, all comments are hidden and only video is shown…
/r/MensRights12/10/18 07:21 AM
2

She said what amounts to: "come and see me when you're 10 years older, kid". That signals a clear intent NOT to do anything sexual with a minor. It was also from the context delivered in good humour, and NPH does not claim to be disturbed or traumatised. Likening that to propositioning a minor for sex is excessively prudish and Victorian.
/r/MensRights12/10/18 05:38 AM
3

I respect the fact that at least you're consistent. At least we agree that rules should be applied equally. On the other hand, I think that this Victorian slide into sexual paranoia is not good for us as a society or as individuals. It will end with innocent men hanged, imprisoned and castrated, as it always does.
/r/MensRights12/10/18 04:29 AM
6

This is a good point. There's not a lot of quality research into the transfer of wealth from men to women via government, and even less I think into the unofficial, hidden economy where massive wealth is transferred from men to women privately. Current social trends see men disengaged from gainful employment, decreasing tax revenue, and withdrawing from female contact/cohabitation also (MGTOW etc.). That means that men's excess productivity is reduced and women's ability to harness men's product…
/r/MensRights12/10/18 04:20 AM
-4

There may be some SJW types who would go into hysterics if that were the case, true. So we should act like them? Just more evidence that the denizens of this sub have become the male equivalent of Tumblr feminists then, ever on the lookout for a new outrage. Is it (a bit of banter like this) or is it not a big fucking deal? I say no, regardless of the genders.
/r/MensRights12/10/18 03:35 AM
-1

Seems like she did nothing wrong. Attempt to manufacture outrage?
/r/MensRights12/10/18 12:30 AM
1

My comment wasn't directed at your remarks.
/r/MensRights11/10/18 03:13 AM
-1

I'm fucking disgusted by the comments on this article. Is this r/mensrights or r/malesupremacy? I guess it is true that, given time, you start to resemble that which you hate most (female supremacists). ​ For starters, the notion that this is somehow a validation of superior male performance in the workplace is just pure fantasy. Projection bias anyone? There is no mention in the article of actual on-the-job performance assessment of any staff, either by the A.I. or by human hand as a pre-input …
/r/MensRights11/10/18 01:16 AM
3

Not surprising. The project seems to have been some sort of linguistic analysis of resume/c.v. material. Whether human or A.I. driven, hiring decisions based on these limited data would be prone to error. I imagine that there was a feedback control loop of sorts where they fed in the resumes of staff who actually turned out to be high performers. What they seem to have discovered is that it's quite possible for the resumes of poor performers to be linguistically similar; conversely perhaps some …
/r/MensRights10/10/18 08:43 PM
9

Very magnanimous of you to throw OP a bone and all, but where is this spelling error of which you speak?
/r/MensRights05/10/18 04:06 AM
5

It's not just feminism, but post modernism that gets a serve. Read the full article - it's worth it; also hilarious.
/r/MensRights04/10/18 12:17 PM
6

Well, let's say for the sake of argument that for biological reasons there is a greater threat of rape for women in the general case (exempt the specific case of men in US prisons for a moment). In other words, assume a higher base chance of being raped for one sex. Now, actual risk of being raped is a result of that base chance, minus any mitigating controls. So it makes sense that if women are at greater risk of being raped, there would be more applicable controls. The problem is that some wom…
/r/MensRights04/10/18 11:51 AM
5

Agree. This is something that really harms advocacy for men's issues. These problems are bigger and more important than scoring points over local political adversaries. Here in Australia, both sides of politics pander to the anti-male agenda - especially when it comes to family violence rhetoric. I realise that there are allies on the political right; there is nothing wrong with working with those allies but the goal should be bipartisan support from major parties. Personally I am a leftist in e…
/r/MensRights04/10/18 04:41 AM
5

I say: let's give it a try. Internet service is down and you need a tech to go to the datacentre? Too bad, the 5% of qualified female techs are busy and they cost $500/hr, so you'll just have to wait for the curfew to be lifted. Your roof blew off in a storm? Sorry, no men available to help. Try to stay dry until dawn! Power outage? Sorry! Fire? Good luck! Night shifts? All female now! We men are all at home watching Netflix.
/r/MensRights03/10/18 12:40 PM
15

Done. Told them I will be voting with my wallet and buying elsewhere from now on. Fuck this company and others like it.
/r/MensRights03/10/18 06:49 AM
1

Yeah yeah, like your comment was on point in the slightest. Terry Crews consented to nothing. How does that relate to implied consent to related activity? Not at all. I will happily discuss at length with someone who argues with integrity - you do not. You are just pushing bullshit enthusiastic consent dogma. ​ Pizza Man (PM): "One large Italian Sausage pizza!" ​ Lady Customer (LC): "Oh no! I have enough for the pizza, but no money for a tip. How about I take your pants down?" ​ PM: "That sounds…
/r/MensRights02/10/18 02:49 AM
4

No fucking way and never will I support that. Reasonable adults can and do discern between two things that are related and allowable and those that aren't. Asking permission to swap from left breast to right breast, and every other little thing can fuck off with all the other feminist infantilisation and demonisation of normal sexuality. Tea! Get bent.
/r/MensRights01/10/18 05:21 PM
5

I couldn't see the article or archive. Was it linked? I just see an image of the top portion. The highlighted text says that she consented to part of an encounter - that implies that something happened for which consent was not given. We have people here who seem to think that any consent = anything goes. OK, if you agree to have sex with a woman, then her burly friend barges in and pegs you in the arse, whether you want it or not that's fine because you consented right? On the other hand, there…
/r/MensRights01/10/18 02:03 PM
6

You said that meeting people means jack shit in STEM, yet surely you would have to concede based on your own example that connections lead to opportunity, and therefore constitute an advantage. Many women's affirmative action programs in the IT space set out to create connections between female students and powerful people in the professional world. The fact that in your anecdotal experience you have seen no evidence of this networking bearing fruit does not mean that it cannot or does not work.…
/r/MensRights30/09/18 09:28 AM
6

I don't agree with the comment to which you're responding, but a couple of things about your post: You assert that networking is not important, but then you contradict that point by stating that you received an internship placement through personal connections; by contrast your male classmate received a placement only by virtue of working much harder than you (by your admission). This supports the conclusion that networking matters. In education men are (in my view) quite objectively second clas…
/r/MensRights30/09/18 08:43 AM
1

Hey buddy, I know that the favouritism aimed at women and girls in education can be disheartening, but as someone who is now a veteran in the IT field and generally considered by my peers to be an expert in my specialisation, I wanted to give you this encouragement: The real world is not like this. If you listen overly much to the naysayers here and elsewhere, you will fall into the same trap that so many women do when feminists tell them that the whole profession/world is biased against them. I…
/r/MensRights30/09/18 08:19 AM
6

CEU's certification was threatened due to ties to George Soros, not because it offers Gender Studies. Also the University was recertified for 5 years in February of this year, so your information is old and misleading.
/r/MensRights22/09/18 12:28 AM
2

Seems like some Da Vinci code level conspiracy theory to me. Illuminati confirmed!
/r/MensRights18/09/18 05:31 PM
10

This is a shit thread. We're not looking at some bullshit witch trial by social media. It's someone who, if the account is true, has done the right thing by collecting evidence of misconduct and making a complaint through appropriate channels. She is apparently asking the authority to make a determination based on the evidence presented. Sure it could be a fabricated story, but if so then the harm of it seems limited because she is not making unsubstantiated claims using the accused's real name …
/r/MensRights18/09/18 05:27 PM
8

I don't understand how those arguments are related. In this case aren't we talking about a complainant who clearly said no many times, and an accused who repeatedly ignored that? That doesn't sound remotely like the Louis CK case.
/r/MensRights18/09/18 05:09 PM
1

I don't know why you think that men are keen to be corporate slaves. We don't necessarily want to work that much either. You appear to be confusing willingness to work with desire to work. This article seems to think that women deserve a break from work and men don't. We disagree with that. Some people think that nobody deserves a break (how very American), maybe others think that everyone does. At any rate, acting like maternity leave is some sort of holiday that non-parents should get to share…
/r/MensRights18/09/18 02:25 AM
1

There's a big gulf between those who identify as feminists because they were told that it's all about fairness and equality of opportunity (usually the dictionary definition goes along these lines), and what academic feminism and organised feminist activism seem to teach and do. These days there are not so many women who publicly identify as feminist; perhaps because it's becoming easier for ordinary people to see some of the things that are being done in its name. I think that more people ident…
/r/MensRights16/09/18 02:07 PM
1

Boo. You didn't do your homework did you? In the time it took to write that crap you could have Googled her name and found all the code samples you wanted. Look at her Stack Overflow rep for fuck's sake. She even called that out in her response to this shit. You can see her code in the 400+ accepted answers she's got up there. Evidently her peers in the field think she's pretty good. But nooo, you're so blinded by anger and cognitive bias that you don't care if legit talent gets caught in the cr…
/r/MensRights16/09/18 01:35 PM
2

Unless you're a shit-hot coder, odds are good that you're not fit to judge the quality of her work. I kid you not. She has 27,835 Stack Overflow points and over 400 answers. She's the Lead iOS Engineer for Rallybound and member of the RayWenderlich.com iOS tutorial team. In other words, she has a deep knowledge of her particular subject matter expertise; given that you don't know who she is, it seems to me unlikely that you are on the same level. Maybe you could ask her to give you a few tips.
/r/MensRights16/09/18 01:54 AM
1

I think that I see the argument that you're making re stereotypes vs. sexism. The story above is the latter. Example: If someone told you that you were going to meet a programmer, if you assumed that you were going to meet a man you would be right 90% of the time. That's stereotyping. If the person turns out to be a woman and you refuse to believe it - maybe ask to see the man who's really doing the work - in my book that's sexism. In men's rights we see this with parenting all the time. If you …
/r/MensRights16/09/18 01:41 AM
20

For the record, I might be interested in that, but I sure as fuck wouldn't want to read about it in some feminist mag. Maybe in an industry piece where the interviewer actually knew something about programming, and could talk about that, rather than yet another "you go girl" women in tech puff piece. There was a Reddit thread that went into this woman's Stack Overflow reputation (she's somewhere around the top 2%). The problem with these feminist rags is that they're so predictably boring. They …
/r/MensRights15/09/18 03:21 PM
8

You know what, the #1 thing that pisses me off about feminism is the way that men's problems are always denied; if they can't be denied they are minimised; and as a last resort they're turned back on men because it's all the fault of the patriarchy, feminism's God of the Gaps that explains all unknowns. As much as I think that feminism mostly invents problems out of nothing, or claims that universal human problems are in fact uniquely gendered women's issues - here we have an actual undeniable i…
/r/MensRights15/09/18 03:02 PM
9

I don't know why you got downvoted for saying that. What are we feminists now, downvoting inconvenient truths? There was a story (or picture caption) about this model who is also a competent programmer. It was a stupid story - didn't really convey properly how competent this lady is because they were dumbing it down for the layperson. Let me tell you, as someone in the industry, this lady has chops, and deserves respect. You know what the comment section was like? "Hur dur I bet she can do 'Hell…
/r/MensRights15/09/18 02:09 PM
3

I'm aware of the original Clinton quote, but what's the link to hurricanes?
/r/MensRights14/09/18 12:25 AM
23

Come on... I understand the anger and frustration, but adversaries of men's rights will just point to this and say: "see! They advocate for violence against women!!1!one!"
/r/MensRights13/09/18 10:38 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter