TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Ingbenn Archive

View 0 posts and 78 comments by Ingbenn on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

If you for whatever reason wouldnt be happy with the other options (ive spoken to men who've had them, they were all happy, because theres really no reason not to be unless what you wanted WAS circumcision) then you can just go back in to get a full circ. Like the other options are fixing the issue while keeping everything, circumcision is fixing it by removing everything, and once you do it, you cant try the other less invasive options. Unfortunate
/r/MensRights10/12/25 11:03 AM
1

Mind actually explaining what I said that lead to you feeling that way in my comment above? Because saying, "actually, i was gonna donate lots and lots of money!" Isnt gonna make anybody feel bad, none of your replies on this post make you appear sympathetic to this issue, just downplaying that its not as big of an issue as many men claim it is. So, please, do tell me what specifically i said that was problematic to you, because my reply above was not attacking you in any way, it was simply expl…
/r/MensRights10/12/25 12:35 AM
1

"But that's your experience and how you deal with it" multiple of your replies in this post have been downplaying the severity of this as an issue. Do you think "immaturity" is calling out people for their bullshit statements?
/r/MensRights10/12/25 12:31 AM
2

Its literally that simple. Then, typically, they'll reply "but i wouldn't wanna get cut as an adult, thatd be painful and cost money" going off their biased logic of having always been cut as a baby, they genuinely think theyd want to be cut if they hadnt been, and considering just how few adults actually even want to be cut, and how many cut men love to claim theyd wish they were cut if they weren't, clearly thats not the case... The vast majority of those men cut as babies who tell themselves …
/r/MensRights08/12/25 08:10 PM
1

I've unfortunately heard this exact story countless times. If your very important question gets "brushed off" by a surgeon, definitely consider not going along with whatever it is until they answer. Its very common for medical personal to do things thay are in their own best interest, a surgeon for example wont be getting paid for a surgury if he doesnt do a surgery, so naturally there exists some people who will try to get people to do surgeries by limiting the patient's knowledge to be within …
/r/MensRights08/12/25 02:53 PM
1

So, what, I presume phimosis then? And their first reaction was to recommend circumcision...? If so that seems pretty typical, its the "easiest" option while also being the biggest surgical procedure compared to the few others.
/r/MensRights08/12/25 01:09 PM
0

Yeah, and if you dont care about it then why would you seek to try and ban it...? Like c'mon The purpose of "conversations" like this is to get people to think about it. Many people, i suppose like you, dont want to think about it because "i dont care" Well then why make the point you did just now? "I cant change anything" obviously, but is the past irrelevant? Say you were born blind, itd be easy to not care since blind is all you know, and you have nothing else to compare to. But say you were …
/r/MensRights08/12/25 12:44 AM
0

Thinking sure is so miserable isnt it? Life must be great when you are incapable of feeling wronged when wrong things happen to you all because it happened as a baby.
/r/MensRights07/12/25 05:18 PM
2

It definitely wouldn't have looked "normal" but i honestly think it looks better left as is than the "correction" they insist be done. It feels like an excuse to do a surgury if im being entirely honest. Penis's with hypospadias definitely have a specific look to them, its just kinda weird that people are so insistent on "reparing" the mild deformity. I have never seen a single penis with hypospadias that looked better post op compared to before, which is saddening, though ofcourse thats my opin…
/r/MensRights07/12/25 05:04 PM
2

Based on the convos ive had to people with this issue, they largely agree that it seemed kinda unwarranted, to them it felt more like a forced procedure to "fit in" despite the fact it makes the penis very standout in the way it looks post op. Most of them had the "oh well, it is what it is" mentality, but still felt it should've been up to them. Like based on what i know about it, nothing about it is particularly an issue that "needs" to be fixed, rather the person should be able to "fix" it if…
/r/MensRights07/12/25 04:24 PM
0

"Female circumcision isnt a thing unless you are in a 3rd world shithole" (most countries that practice male circumcision are 3rd world shitholes too, your point is shit, everu country that does female cutting also does Male cutting and views them the same, because they largely are) yes, it is, adult women even in the USA choose and consent to forms of female cutting for cosmetic and medical reasons both. "Why would other parts of my body be cut off, thats dumb" oh, so the only single part of yo…
/r/MensRights07/12/25 04:18 PM
2

That doesnt mean you couldnt have sex That just means you cant ejaculate inside the woman Also doesnt mean you cant get a woman pregnant either since other methods can be used.
/r/MensRights07/12/25 04:11 PM
0

You don't care why? Would you care if other parts of your body had been cut off? Is female circumcision also not problematic? Curious
/r/MensRights07/12/25 03:44 PM
1

You... wouldn't be able to have sex? As for the standing and peeing thing, i dont particularly see that as a valid issue to force a surgury like this, thats more of a convenience thing that not even all guys choose to do anyways.
/r/MensRights07/12/25 03:42 PM
1

Me saying you lack a frame of reference is shining light on the fact you are claiming something that was done to you has 0 impact on you, based on... what, your forced ignorance of what not being cut is like? If you are cut as a baby, you cannot know the opposite, and will likely grow up feeling whatever you have is "fine" since relative to the only experience you've ever had, its always been the same. While to a guy whos not cut, he would consider the experience with it that youve had to be bad…
/r/MensRights07/12/25 03:39 PM
1

What is the need to have the surgury to fix the issue in the first place? Is it really that much of a problem?
/r/MensRights07/12/25 03:34 PM
2

How is it "incredibly stupid" if you dont even have a frame of reference to back up that claim...?
/r/MensRights07/12/25 02:59 PM
3

What I've never understood was why they "need" to circumcise to "fix" the issue Ive actually met somebody who had it, above average sized penis, but it looked like Freddy Kruger due to the way they did the surgery, felt bad for the guy.
/r/MensRights07/12/25 02:53 PM
1

Apparently it aint so "Duh" to the vast majority of people The entire aspect of "preferring" it being based on a cultural norm is problematic, thats not an innate preference that people just develop with little bias. That same logic applied to female circumcision is entirely unacceptable in the western world.
/r/MensRights07/12/25 10:41 AM
2

A sword rusts without its sheath 💀 Also, considering the cultish ritualistic way its performed, is it really that far away from being an "act of satan"? You are cutting a part of the genitals of a child off to draw blood for a covenant/sacrifice to a deity...
/r/MensRights07/12/25 10:23 AM
3

The vast majority of women who "prefer cut" do so because its largely what is taught to be the norm in the USA, its what people are used to in areas with high cut rates, the less common "variation" is going to naturally be "weird" or "alien" to people who arent used to it Most people claiming to prefer cut have never even experienced a non cut penis, or how it even works. My 2 cents, you should ask why.
/r/MensRights07/12/25 09:40 AM
3

Enjoy pulling shit out your ass I see It being desensitized, again, does not directly correlate to being able to ejaculate You can ejaculate and not feel much pleasure, you keep trying to correlate the 2 together despite them not being the same thing. You saying "it would decrease birthrate" implies it would impact your ability to ejaculate so much so you cant even get a woman pregnant, circumcision does make it harder to ejaculate, it varies man to man, but on average its not going to make it i…
/r/MensRights07/12/25 09:38 AM
5

Lmao, thats not how "beating" works. Even guys who struggle to feel anything can beat it if they want to. Being able to "beat it" doesnt equate to feeling pleasure.
/r/MensRights07/12/25 08:15 AM
3

"Its not desensitized" do tell how you can make that claim when you have no frame of reference.
/r/MensRights07/12/25 08:10 AM
2

Your open mindedness to even consider those possibilities is admirable, since most men will refuse to acknowledge them entirely.
/r/MensRights07/12/25 08:09 AM
2

The bias of a man cut as a baby:
/r/MensRights07/12/25 08:07 AM
3

The "misinformation" in question being...?
/r/MensRights07/12/25 08:06 AM
3

"That's your experience and how you deal with it" Men shouldn't have to be forced to deal with this as an issue in the first place, it seems like you are trolling with how braindead some of the shit you say is.
/r/MensRights07/12/25 08:06 AM
2

Thats one of the first instances ive seen somebody mention the female cutting thing other than myself, and it's 100% true, the vast majority of women who underwent some form of femsle cutting, themselves defend the practice and claim no difference, or even that it feels better/is cleaner, really the exsct same excuses cut men in the USA make to justify and rationalize the harm done to them.
/r/MensRights07/12/25 08:03 AM
3

Right, nice way to downplay a real issue by falsely accusing and then generalizing people, bravo. Crazy idea, many men simply wish to have had the ability to decide for themselves, and to experience both to know what truly would've been best/what they would've wanted. "And not focussed on helping men" ending forced circumcision is about as clear cut as you can be towards helping men, its among the biggest issues we face in places like the USA. Plenty of men get angey about it simply upon learnin…
/r/MensRights07/12/25 08:01 AM
1

So you dont think about it and have no frame of reference? Does it not matter simply because you dont acknowledge it? Why should cutting parts of peoples genitals off non consensually not matter?
/r/MensRights07/12/25 07:55 AM
1

And you would know that how?
/r/MensRights07/12/25 07:54 AM
3

You don't feel there is anything wrong with it because 1. You only know what being cut is like, and 2. Its what you grew up feeling was normal. "I never really understand whats wrong with it" as i said, you lack a frame of reference to even know what would or wouldnt be wrong, its just as normal as it has ever been to you. Isnt it so peculiar how much easier it is to convince somebody something is okay if you force that thing on them when they are the most impressionable in life?
/r/MensRights07/12/25 07:54 AM
2

Life being as it should be is a person making a decision like this for themselves.
/r/MensRights07/12/25 07:51 AM
2

"whats important" is peoples bodily autonomy. You're cutting part of a mans private parta/genitals off That's a massive issue. Leave it to a cut man who doesnt have a frame of reference to downplay its significance just because he feels what he has is fine since he doesnt even know the difference.
/r/MensRights07/12/25 07:50 AM
1

Why did you
/r/MensRights07/12/25 07:47 AM
3

Why is she happy part of your dick was cut off?
/r/MensRights07/12/25 07:45 AM
3

You already had a few decades of time between being cut and experiencing sexual acts This doesnt apply to you because you wouldnt be able to tell the difference
/r/MensRights07/12/25 07:44 AM
3

You suck at "helping" apparently. Cutting a sensitive and mobile part of a males genitals off is going to, respectively, significantly impact his penis and how it feels. There is no "over exaggeration" It can vary person to person, everybody is different.
/r/MensRights07/12/25 07:29 AM
2

The standard for an acceptable circumcision in the USA is unfortunately incredibly low.
/r/MensRights07/12/25 07:25 AM
4

What was "wrong" with your penis as a baby? All babies are naturally born with phimosis, it isnt supposed to be pulled back until it separates naturally.
/r/MensRights07/12/25 07:22 AM
1

Easy for people who have something others no longer do to not understand the value of it.
/r/MensRights07/12/25 07:19 AM
1

The phimosis bit is a bit strange I only say this because all babies are born with foreskin that cannot be retracted, as it is attached to the glans, if however it is forced back prematurely, that act can directly cause phimosis to happen, actual phimosis, which persists later in life When you say you "had phimosis as a baby" what exactly do you mean?
/r/MensRights07/12/25 07:18 AM
3

The entire idea of it being applicable to a newborn baby to begin with is botched, you are ruining normal anatomy, much less the individuals with less than ideal or outright "botched" cuts, relative to what the hospital even considers "botched", i say this because some hospitals have a very high standard for a botch to be considered a botch. Super poorly done circumcisions are considered within the realm of "acceptable" just because there was no clear "adverse effect". Their quality control is b…
/r/MensRights07/12/25 07:15 AM
2

It is a very, very small minority of peoppe who seek to cut themselves because they believe it will "yield better sensations" If a man feels that way, and wants the sensations being cut brings Then he has a fetish for circumcision, this also applies to women, and some parents project their "preference" onto their own child, which is absolutely vile. In terms of you talking about sensations being subjective, seemingly in defense of the practice being valid or some sort, what about women in counti…
/r/MensRights07/12/25 07:11 AM
4

In some studies comparing sensitivity of cut vs non cut. The parts of the penis they compared in their study completely left out the foreskin Since it was "unfair to the cut men who didnt have it" Then their claim was that foreskin made no significant impact on sexual sensations or pleasure. Its almost like when you ignore the part of the penis the entire fucking study is supposed to be about, you magically wont find "any notable differences" Gotta love the bias in studies who actively have an a…
/r/MensRights07/12/25 07:05 AM
3

Feeling validated is a powerful defensive mechanism The USA perpetuating ot as a good thing makes men feel their cut dick is justified And them having 0 frame of reference to compare to reinforces their ignorance of what not being cut is like So its much, much easier to live in denial than it is to actually consider the possibility you were permanently wronged.
/r/MensRights07/12/25 07:00 AM
2

I'm not sure if you knew this, but women can also rarely get clitoral phimosis, where their hood adheres to their clitoral glans/scars/is tight Typically surgical removal of some or all of their hood is used as treatment For the people who love to use "prevents phimosis" as a reason for male infant circumcision, cutting females hoods off would also prevent them from having phimosis and cleaning issues. It truly is a gross double standard
/r/MensRights07/12/25 05:12 AM
2

You dont prevent rare conditions by forcing the last resort treatment on everybody when statistically only a very small minority will get it.
/r/MensRights07/12/25 04:38 AM
1

I was cut as a baby.
/r/MensRights07/12/25 04:02 AM
1

I mean, did you tru anything else to fix it or what?
/r/MensRights07/12/25 03:51 AM
1

What, phimosis?
/r/MensRights07/12/25 01:31 AM
1

Are you implying this same phenomena applies to cut females too...?
/r/MensRights07/12/25 01:30 AM
1

Why wouldn't it, if it was tight?
/r/MensRights07/12/25 01:27 AM
3

As long as it keeps being forced on people in mass, "gone wrong" cases will always be more common People love using "but botches are rare" as if that is somehow excusable They would be even more rare if circumcision was less common and the choice of the individual.
/r/MensRights07/12/25 01:24 AM
1

One of the few times ive seen that argument used outside myself. Ive had some pretty laughable respinses from people, they essentially said "it should only be done in rare cases with the womans consent, if they are very likely to get breast cancer!" Okay so... why cant that same logic be applied to males foreskin? The amount of men who get issues with their foreskin is literally less than the amount if women who get breast cancer, of which roughly 1/40 die from within 5 years iirc. Preventing th…
/r/MensRights15/11/25 08:40 PM
1

And if a mans preference is for the woman to not have "extra" flaps of skin around her genitals, can the same logic apply...?
/r/MensRights15/11/25 08:33 PM
1

Most frmale cutting is not for that intention, as the lme listed is specifically referring to infibulation, done in Somali, which only makes up 10% of FGM cases 7 year later reply lmao.
/r/MensRights15/11/25 08:30 PM
1

Typically feminists dont wanna hear/acknowledge that They are (typically) women therefore cutting of their own genitals = bad The western medical world refuses to study minor forms of FGM or acknowledge any muslim studies done because "it's so obviously bad why would we study it" aka its unethical to study it due to it being ethically and morally wrong Yet that same logic seemed to be absent when itching to "study" male circumcision for "benefits"
/r/MensRights10/03/25 02:39 AM
1

Spoken like a true ignoramus 1. The entire clitoris is never removed 2. There are many different types of FGM being practiced 3. Not all forms of FGM are done for the "sole purpose of making sex as least pleasurable as possible" 4. Many adult women in the western world get things like clitoridectomies or hoodectomies done either because they need it medically or want it aesthetically. 5. The last part of your bit was talking about something called "infibulation" aka the worst type of FGM and the…
/r/MensRights10/03/25 02:32 AM
1

As for the topic of circumcision being a male problem, male circumcision 1. Removes more tissue than FGM does (all forms of FGM, typically) 2. Is 10 times more common worldwide than all forms of FGM combined 3. Is significantly more socially and culturally accepted, because cutting a part of a baby or child males genitals off magically becomes okay just because hes a male while doing the exact same thing to women is seen as one of the worst human rights violations still being practiced today. It…
/r/MensRights10/03/25 02:20 AM
1

There hasnt been any "benefit" discussed for lesser damaging versions of FGM because its seen as innately immoral and unethical to even suggest that they could have any, they refuse to study it out of that sense, minor forms of FGM largely have the exact same "benefits" that circumcision is stated to have, forms of FGM are even done for medical reasons such as cancer or clitoral phimosis, which is a thing. There are also women who get forks of it done consensually as adults even in countries lik…
/r/MensRights10/03/25 02:13 AM
1

The why kind of is important, because its acknowledging the societal stigmas and norms that propagate such ignorant "preferences" Isnt it just magical how women from countries that dont cut just... dont prefer cut over not cut? A vast majority of american women were told it's bad/gross to not be cut, therefore that must be the case, even if so many of then have never experienced not cut. Just the stigma surrounding it creates "preferences"
/r/MensRights10/03/25 02:08 AM
1

"Feel safe"
/r/MensRights03/12/24 02:20 AM
1

Not if you have scarring on the glans
/r/MensRights06/11/24 01:00 PM
1

The frenulum and frenular band at the tip of the foreskin are some of the most enjoyable parts of the foreskin, they would still he damaged What "defects" of the foreskin are you talking about
/r/MensRights06/11/24 12:57 PM
1

What "benefits"
/r/MensRights06/11/24 12:56 PM
1

Historically jews used to remove only the tip of the foreskin, but with time the practice progressively became more demented the more adult men wished they werent cut If you leave most of the skin, they are likely to he aware of what actually happened because they still have much of it If you remove all of it and your entire culture forgets what having it is like, well, then nobody can ask questions
/r/MensRights06/11/24 12:56 PM
1

It may sound awfully cliche but, same
/r/MensRights06/11/24 12:49 PM
1

Its actually pathetic to me that the Piercing baby/children debate is actually considered more important by so many people, those same people of which validate cutting half the skin of their babies penis, despite disagreeing with poking a small hole in the skin of their babies ear The mental contradictions people will go to to validate their own bodies as parents
/r/MensRights06/11/24 12:41 PM
1

Uhuh
/r/MensRights06/11/24 12:36 PM
1

To quote Andrew Gross - "You actually dont own any rights to your body"
/r/MensRights06/11/24 12:36 PM
1

And, you know, is removing a large amount of tissue, skin tissue of which is unique to the genitals and only the genitals, which is extremely sensitive
/r/MensRights06/11/24 12:33 PM
1

And that's not even entertaining the idea that cht men cant always know or be aware if anything is wrong simply because their frame of reference has only ever been what they were forced to have
/r/MensRights06/11/24 12:31 PM
1

That's going off of their standard of a "good" circumcision In the USA the standard is incredibly low, complications are often not accounted for, and, in the instance they are, are often projected onto some other issue that was, still, cause originally by the circumcision It has to have went seriously wrong for them to actually acknowledge it went wrong, otherwise theyll ignore it and the parents wont think anything different, and since a baby cant understand or sue them, they get away risk free…
/r/MensRights06/11/24 12:29 PM
1

And to add to the wound, so many people find that prospect humorous, "how can a mere useless flap of skin actually effect you mentally, you're just weak and want something to complain about and victimize yourself with" They project their ignorance onto you willingly
/r/MensRights06/11/24 12:24 PM
2

I am not and never have been embarrassed But enraged I have, if anything, spoken about it "too much" in public places online since having the luxury of finding out that it was even a thing, since the USAs culture is heavy on cramming ignorance down your throat, it's almost impossible to find out about it unless you have internet
/r/MensRights06/11/24 12:21 PM
1

In a majority of cases, the entire foreskin is still removed on an adult, unless he were to specifically say how much he wanted removed Though yes there are outliers, it is uncommon
/r/MensRights06/11/24 12:17 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter