TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

InjuryThick2353 Archive

View 0 posts and 87 comments by InjuryThick2353 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

I am inclined to agree. I also don't think that a boyfriend having sex with a drunk woman is rape either. This belief of mine would make lots of people call me absolutely fucking evil. Probably you too. However, I am logically consistent, and you ae not. In Iceland it's not rape under the law. And Iceland is super feminist. Aggressively so.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 02:44 AM
1

It would not.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/24 05:16 AM
2

Yes and most people are actually quite disgusted in reall ife when you tell them the FBI definition. And men can be made to penetrate. A drunken man can't consent. A man might be blackmailed with the threat of an accusation if he doesn't sleep with her. A woman's bodyweight might not be able to be lifted off, and he succumbs to her riding him. I mean, you could make this argument for women. "Women can't be raped because they are able to carry pepper spray everywhere."
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/24 05:16 AM
3

Than male pedophiles are actually equally rare. The vast majority of men on the sex offender list had consensual sex with teen girls. Yes but women still kill slightly more children in general. Women can rape men, and the definition you are using is simply misandric. Being made to penetrate is actually considered rape by the majority of people, and most will concede that it isn't right that it is not considered rape under the law. This makes you quite cooky and abnormal actually. No, 90% of all …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/24 03:40 AM
2

Feminism is correlated with narcissism ironically.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/24 03:37 AM
0

Something like 60% of rape accusations are false in the American military, were security is top notch and they have great video cameras everywhere. I always find it funny that this always devolves into a stat throwing contest as if it decides whether men or women are more evil. 1% of the population commits 63% of the violent crime. You can try and slander men all you want, but women have similar skeletons in their closet, and in the end, we are talking about 1% of the population. You're just dis…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/24 07:44 PM
1

As I said, women kill babies more than they are killed themselves. When you add up being driven to suicide from abuse, and being murdered by proxy through another man, women commit the majority of spousal murder. There is currently an epidemic of female pedophiles in school right now. You're probably aware of the thousands per year that take place and a new one is reported on every week. Women kill most of the children. They kill younger children than men, but they still kill most of the childre…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/24 07:43 PM
1

They are also just innately neurotic and pathetic.
/r/MensRights05/05/24 07:37 PM
1

Those men are incredibly sycophantic and should not have "stepped up". Women refuse to step up for men in quite literally anything. Also, women aren't oppressed in Iran. Those men haven't stepped up, they were just sycophantic. Women are quite horrible people tbh.
/r/MensRights05/05/24 06:53 PM
1

Women aren't the ones being killed in the streets either for not wearing a tight piece of fabric. Most women are not murdered for that. It's even debatable if the woman in question was. Men are the majority of victims of police brutality. Thank you for showing everyone that women, no matter how much sycophantic men try and please them, will forever be cunty and misbehaved wretches. They really just don't shut the fuck up do they.
/r/MensRights05/05/24 06:51 PM
1

It is 100% real. Stop trying to unreasonably respect women.
/r/MensRights05/05/24 06:49 PM
1

r/iamaretard
/r/MensRights05/05/24 06:45 PM
4

This is quite literally whataboutism. You could very well put this under the very definition of whataboutism in a textbook of the definition of words. You have absolutely zero intellectual honesty. Also, men are like 90% of homicide victims, and women are 8x more likely to kill babies than to be killed. The infanticide rate is 8 per 100,000 The murder of women rate is 1 per 100,000
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/24 06:31 PM

Yes but this is a shit definition of patriarchy. We all know what people think when they hear patriarchy. Also, a patriarchy implies that women are somehow barred from certain opportunites, not just that men outcompete them. Is patriarchy relating to male-predominant outcomes, or male only opportunities? If there is objectively no discrimination and men still make up the top of organizations, is that still patriarchy? Why use the word if it's definition is fucking useless and nebulous?
/r/MensRights05/05/24 07:20 AM
1

Men don't defend pedophiles. Women do so with regularity. The few men who do, are punished swiftly. Men do defend female pedophiles tho
/r/MensRights05/05/24 07:16 AM
1

They were never out of balance. It is very far in the past. People have been saying has gone too far literally since feminism was created. There was not one year in the entire 20th century were a woman couldn't own property, work, start a business, go to university. And women have been voting in America for 104 years. I mean do you think that women didn't have rights 50 yrs ago? Women really need to engage in some genuine self-reflection and critical thinking, because they don't seem to do much …
/r/MensRights05/05/24 07:15 AM
1

There were also women in history who wielded extremely overt power. So I don't really agree with this.
/r/MensRights05/05/24 07:10 AM
2

Dark as fuck but poignant.
/r/MensRights05/05/24 07:09 AM
5

They were definitely always like that. Towards a sane feminism : Wilma Meikle : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive 1916 The Legal Subjection of Men : Ernest Belfort Bax : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive 1908
/r/MensRights05/05/24 07:01 AM
7

Well there is nothing wrong with the manosphere. It's just the name for the whole dialogue about men.
/r/MensRights05/05/24 06:59 AM
4

*bullies to men But yes
/r/PussyPassDenied05/05/24 03:54 AM
1

Feminists will attempt to say that the sky doesn't exist if they have to in order to keep feminism making sense. Even if that claim wasn't obviously fucking complete pseudo-scientific dogshit, it wouldn't matter anyway. Pedophilia is pedophilia.
/r/MensRights05/05/24 03:53 AM
1

You should stop being friends with them bro.
/r/MensRights05/05/24 03:51 AM

It's only feminism that made people not think that. Throughout history we all used to know.
/r/MensRights05/05/24 03:50 AM
1

accusations too. Not convictions.
/r/MensRights05/05/24 02:03 AM
1

lol, lesbians have higher rates than gays for IPV
/r/MensRights05/05/24 12:07 AM
1

Testosterone is actually associated with fairness.
/r/MensRights05/05/24 12:02 AM

Being aggressive is good. Aggressive doesn't mean what you think it means.
/r/MensRights05/05/24 12:02 AM
1

Suck dick
/r/MensRights04/05/24 11:48 PM
1

It never is empowerment. It's narcissistic from the beginning.
/r/MensRights04/05/24 11:48 PM
1

Feminists are not against any gender differences. This is not true. How many feminist articles are there about women being smarter? This is a hunk of bullshit. Scientific studies are 100% manipulated by feminists in academia. Testosterone does not contribute to the development of narcissism and psychopathy in men. Psychopathy is measured in an intrinsically biased fashion. People often call BPD female psychopathy. You don't get to call men's version of pathology "pyschopathy" and not women's and…
/r/MensRights04/05/24 11:41 PM
1

Correlation does not equal causation. The DSM puts more emphasis on grandiose rather than vulnerable narcissism. Borderline Personality disorder is associated with higher levels of estrogen as well. Are women more likely to be borderline because of their higher levels of estrogen? Borderline is often described as female pyschopathy. You've defined pyschopathy in such a way as to produce innate bias in the results. It's intellectually dishonest. Psychopaths: More Women May Be Psychopaths Than Pre…
/r/MensRights04/05/24 11:37 PM
1

TIL. Feminists infiltrated even science. Crazy harpies.
/r/MensRights04/05/24 11:18 PM
1

Women aren't particularly caring anymore. And there's a lot more than socialization behind these things. This the no-though opinion.
/r/MensRights03/05/24 09:20 AM
1

I mean let's just keep it a buck, it's feminine shaming and social ostracism. If you give women the opporunity to shame someone (especially men) to further their own social status, they usually take it. It's important to remember that women say a lot of things designed to curate an image of themselves, not to find the truth. At the end of the day, pretty much all women are mean girls. Even Jordan Peterson admitted that research shows that being a woman is bigger predictor of woke politics than e…
/r/MensRights02/05/24 09:05 PM
1

I mean let's just keep it a buck, it's feminine shaming and social ostracism. If you give women the opporunity to shame someone (especially men) to further their own social status, they usually take it. It's important to remember that women say a lot of things designed to curate an image of themselves, not to find the truth. At the end of the day, pretty much all women are mean girls. Even Jordan Peterson admitted that research shows that being a woman is bigger predictor of woke politics than e…
/r/MensRights02/05/24 09:02 PM
1

I mean let's just keep it a buck, it's feminine shaming and social ostracism. If you give women the opporunity to shame someone (especially men) to further their own social status, they usually take it. It's important to remember that women say a lot of things designed to curate an image of themselves, not to find the truth. At the end of the day, pretty much all women are mean girls. Even Jordan Peterson admitted that research shows that being a woman is bigger predictor of woke politics than e…
/r/MensRights02/05/24 09:02 PM
1

It does, but I see growing awareness. So I'm actually not totally defeatist, even if I might have come off that way. South Korea also gives me a lot of hope.
/r/MensRights02/05/24 08:55 PM
7

Except they are just being handed the jobs, lol. They are just complaining anyway. Affirmative action hiring is entrenched in the labor market, and likely millions of women have jobs they didn't earn. Women are just neurotic and love getting people to do things for them sadly. https://www.pnas.org/content/early/2015/04/08/1418878112.abstract
/r/MensRights01/05/24 09:13 PM
27

Except they are just being handed the jobs, lol. They are just complaining anyway. Affirmative action hiring is entrenched in the labor market, and likely millions of women have jobs they didn't earn. Women are just neurotic and love getting people to do things for them sadly. https://www.pnas.org/content/early/2015/04/08/1418878112.abstract
/r/MensRights01/05/24 09:13 PM
1

Women do prefer male bosses. Americans Still Prefer a Male Boss (gallup.com) Who's to make the claim that female dominated industries are "less fun"? That's a judgement value and unscientific. Seems to me that the researchers are trying to invalidate their own findings cause they don't personally like them. Women can absolutely prefer male bosses while still having an in group bias. Male bosses create a less stressful and hen pecked work environment while female bosses often engage in queen bee …
/r/MensRights01/05/24 06:08 PM
2

I wouldn't say its light years ahead. It's like a couple months ahead. The commission was a temporary commission and only made suggesstions. If these gynocentric suggestions from a temporary commission are Norway's progress then...... Light years is overstating it.
/r/MensRights01/05/24 05:46 AM
4

Norway is still dominated by feminist ways of thinking. Not as bad as America doesn't mean good.
/r/MensRights01/05/24 05:44 AM
1

Am I wrong though? Feminism proves it everyday. The levity and ditziness with which women engage in exterminationist and hate filled rhetoric against men as if it were no big deal. Especially when they are currently privileged under the law.
/r/MensRights01/05/24 04:12 AM
1

That's a fair point. If you look hard enough, you can find a study that shows just about anything. Apparently, 50% of studies are probably false. However, I think that my studies corroborate observable gender dynamics significantly more than your studies. I see my studies reflected in the real-world behavior of men and women and not much of your studies reflected in behavior.
/r/MensRights30/04/24 11:03 PM
28

This woman is hopelessly neurotic. half of these stories are made up for sure. "he will gatekeep it and try to weaponize your need to get sex". Only in the deluded fantasies of bpd women. This woman needs to grow the fuck up and stop being a cunt.
/r/MensRights30/04/24 07:40 AM
15

Women are a frivolous sex. They are frivolous with their interests (fashion, drama, pop culture) and they are as frivolous with their morals. They simply don't give to fucks about impartiality or fairness.
/r/MensRights30/04/24 07:39 AM
16

Both. She probably has diagnosable bpd.
/r/MensRights30/04/24 07:38 AM
1

If they didn't discriminate against men en masse, things would level out back to normal. Before feminist policies, men were most of the school heads and prinicpals. The feminist machine keeps chuggin along unfortunately. We need a South Korean style anti feminist cultural phenomenon.
/r/MensRights30/04/24 07:37 AM
5

I didn't say it wasn't a thing, I'm saying the definition is terrible. Who defines invasive? Unwanted? The point of flirting is to see if its unwanted? How persistent is too persistent? 5 times? 3 times? Anything after 1 time? Many women get upset that men don't chase. Who gets to define what sexual comments are inappropriate? What if its a joke and not even meant to be flirtatious? Many people consider sex jokes to be sexual harassment, especially if the sex jokes involve something about women.…
/r/MensRights30/04/24 07:33 AM
1

I agree that the biological determinism perspective is stupid and reductive. There's an element of truth that we evolved to protect females, and feminism definitely exploits this to the maximum. But there is no possible way that what we see in society is in anyway natural or innate. The real reason that we see feminism dominate the world is because they captured the schools and the churches and the government and the labor market and they virulently censor all opposition as much as they can. The…
/r/MensRights30/04/24 04:42 AM
1

The truth is, women should not be in charge of schools. Men should be principals and school heads because men, with their nonexistent in group bias, actually treat men and women fairly.
/r/MensRights30/04/24 04:38 AM
2

Feminism has always been female chauvinism.
/r/MensRights30/04/24 04:36 AM
2

Why are you coming off as such fuckwad about it? Just explain the details of the case of you're so confident in your position. "I think a lot of men’s issues get ignored, but this ain’t one." Nobody said this was a men's issue, the guy pointed out what he though was a slippery slope. "This ain’t it chief" you sound like a fuckin douche bro.
/r/MensRights30/04/24 04:33 AM
2

Before DV shelters for women popped up in the 70s, wives killed as many husbands as husbands killed wives. DV shelters give people a last resort that isn't spousal murder. Since DV shelters for men don't exist, those men still use spousal murder as a last resort just like women used to do. People hate it when this is pointed out because they want the answer to be to hurt men not help men, even if helping men objectively helps women. People just fuckin hate men.
/r/MensRights30/04/24 04:31 AM
1

The gender wars are not alive and well. Men are just being systematically oppressed around the world. The only place were there is a REAL gender war, where men fight back, is in South Korea, were men have made serious pushpack to the point were it's a cultural phenomenon. They even have an anti feminist president. I hope the rest of the world follows their template.
/r/MensRights30/04/24 04:30 AM
-2

I don't think its harassment to try more than once. It should be drawn out longer than that to be harassment.
/r/MensRights30/04/24 03:11 AM
1

Both male and female employees prefer male bosses. And yes I can tell you shit, these studies are done by feminists for feminists and should be completely thrown away. proof that men are more cooperative. Persistent cooperation and gender differences in repeated Prisoner's Dilemma games: Some things never change - ScienceDirect Further understanding incivility in the workplace: The effects of gender, agency, and communion. (apa.org) Difficult People: Who Is Perceived to Be Demanding in Personal …
/r/MensRights30/04/24 01:29 AM
14

Yes, that would be a better definition of harassment. However, feminists define harassment to include shooting your shot at all if its unwanted. Feminists are dishonest bastards. Approaching a woman alone at a coffee shop and trying to flirt and asking to sit down and getting rejected is considered harassment by many unfortunately, no matter how non-persistent he is.
/r/MensRights30/04/24 12:03 AM
13

No, invasive sexual attention is not harassment. What a horrendous and feminist definition of harassment. Who gets to define invasive? Unwanted? Isn't the point of flirting to find out if someone wants it? Who gets to define sexual? A joke? A compliment about a hair or clothes even if neither party has a crush on the other? You take your definition of harassment from feminists.
/r/MensRights30/04/24 12:00 AM
0

Those studies are bunk feminist studies. Men are superior leaders and most male and female employees prefer male leaders, with females preferring male leaders a little bit more than males. Men are better investors too. Girls excelling in school is because of the WEEA which implemented systemic en masse discrimination against boys in public school. We have the data prior to the WEEA, and boys and girls did much more similarly in school. People mostly get hired for performance, but for the sake of…
/r/MensRights29/04/24 09:09 PM
56

The word "objectified" doesn't mean fucking anything. It's a nebulous term created by feminists to shame men. Try to define it if you can. And the definition of "sexual harassment" is literally just making advances on a woman. Obviously straight women are sexually harassed more than gay women if you define sexual harassment as literally just flirting with a woman. Feminist garbage studies that shouldn't be used in an MRA community.
/r/MensRights29/04/24 09:00 PM
1

Gender neutral is a stupid concept. There's no such thing as gender neutral. men and women will always self segregate into certain gender roles unless you tyrannically enforce otherwise through en masse discrimination. Like we see right now.
/r/MensRights29/04/24 04:13 AM
1

One quick look at your bio and your obssession with being gender neutral makes it evident that you're feminist-adjacent. You shouldn't enforce gender neutrality on people anymore than you should enforce gender roles. If you refrain from socially engineering people, they revert to gender roles, which is fine. If they don't want to, they are exceptions, but no one is stopping them from being exceptions.
/r/MensRights29/04/24 04:10 AM
-1

This is something you discuss amongst yourself and your circle of friends. You have no evidence how common of an occurrence it is. Do you really think all women have the same experience? I could just as easily say the same thing to you. Let's call a spade a spade. The "orgasm" conversation is one for hens to just be hens and be infantile and shame men. I mean, how many exes were uncomfortable with it? All of them? or just you're previous partner? We know the answer lets not kid ourselves. Women …
/r/MensRights29/04/24 04:07 AM
24

Women infantilize politics. They really are suited for chidlren.
/r/MensRights29/04/24 03:58 AM
1

Universities discriminate against men through title ix, scholarships and grants and aid exclusively for women, affirmative action professorial hiring, career fairs exclusively for women, research grants exclusively for women, a plethora of female only clubs while men clubs are socially unacceptable on campus, misandrist attitudes throughout university because of feminist courses etc etc. They don't actively prefer men. They still discriminate against men in many capacities. A small amount of uno…
/r/MensRights29/04/24 02:33 AM
0

Well, women dominate universities off the back of systemic discrimination against men. Women are beginning to do the same to the workforce. Men are seriously discriminated against in cultural attitudes. They are character assassinated everyday. Men are discrimianted against in business. There are loans exclusively for women, and there are even tax write offs for women onwned businesses. Men are discriminated against in DV. They are not adequately perceived as victims even though they are 50% of …
/r/MensRights28/04/24 07:09 AM
1

The civil rights act was originally for black people and women actually weren't included. Feminists complained and simp men complied. However, women didn't need the law at all. Black people did. I mean, barbie was founded by a woman in the 40s, marie curie won two nobel prizes in the 1900s and the first womans university in America was founded in 1807, and I'm expected to believe that women were discriminated against in the 40s? Ayn rand also comes to mind.
/r/MensRights28/04/24 07:06 AM
1

No one is entitled to equity. It's a fucked up concept. Pregnant women can go have a man take care of them pregnant women aren't entitled to anything. No structures are needed for that. Women aren't entitled to anything. They should play by the same rules as everyone else.
/r/MensRights28/04/24 12:03 AM
-1

And you didn't even address her comment. She was talking about women being active in PIV. Not using hands or toys. Men don't get upset at women who ride them. I hate these dumb twox broads who come onto this sub to spread their female garbage. Your input isn't valued or wanted.
/r/MensRights27/04/24 11:51 PM
2

Because women hate men and will emasculate them at any turn. It's not a real fucking issue dude. Women aren't entitled to having orgasms obviously. Their sex is their business and theirs to sort out. We talk about the orgasm gap because women just wanna abusrd soapbox to bitch and moan about female shit all day.
/r/MensRights27/04/24 11:49 PM
0

You are a dumb bitch and an airhead. You don't live in a patriarchal society you fucking bimbo.
/r/MensRights27/04/24 11:48 PM
2

The real truth is that it's nothing more than a vehicle for awful women to be absolutely awful.
/r/MensRights27/04/24 11:44 PM
1

Kind of makes me happy that women suffer from male circumsision. Karmic justice in a way. Ya get what ya give.
/r/MensRights27/04/24 11:38 PM
1

Women were not discriminated against in the 40s. Single moms economically struggle today to find jobs. Does this mean single moms can't find work because they are discriminated against? Of course not. Men are discriminated against objectively under the law. right now. Your mom could have gotten a job. There was nothing stopping her in the 40s. she was not in any way systemically discriminated against. The fact that she personally struggled isn't evidence of anything. Many men back then struggled…
/r/MensRights27/04/24 11:31 PM
1

It takes two to tango dummy. Keep the legs closed
/r/MensRights27/04/24 11:27 PM
0

"In your experience". So you mean absolutely useless information. Your ex isn't "men". Your ex is one guy. It astounds me that female proclivity to just see masses of people. Individualism doesn't exist in the female mind unfortunately. So your experience, is really not wanted or appreciated and we would all benefit if you would refrain from sharing your anecdotes. Also, i don't believe you. I don't believe your side of the story. There's probably a great degree of classic feminine shaming that …
/r/MensRights27/04/24 11:26 PM
1

It's a fucking dudette lol
/r/MensRights27/04/24 11:09 PM
1

It doesn't matter if its by other men you absolute stupid estrogenic creature. Men are more frequently victims than women. Sit down, and accept the facts. Women are safer than men. That's how it is. Quit bitchin.
/r/MensRights27/04/24 11:08 PM
0

Men are held too accountable. Men are held accountable for things they aren't responsible for. Men keep kids from becoming gangsters and whores. Women seem to pop out gangeters and whores out the whazoo. There are not billions of dollars in unpaid child support, in fact, courts make money by enforcing child support payments. Men are sent to prison for not having funds all the time. If women would close their legs, they wouldn't have to get abortions. You don't actually give a fuck about accounta…
/r/MensRights27/04/24 11:07 PM
17

This is women to a tee goddamn.
/r/MensRights27/04/24 10:56 PM
1

Our education system is more suited for women and its horrendous like that. It discriminates against men under the law. It's also grossly inferior than it used to be, producing objectively inferior students than in prior decades. Women hate free speech because women are generally more totalitarian than men and enforce social norms more than men, no matter how constrictive they are. You are a beta male. Imagine thinking men are more evil as a man... Thanks for telling use that you get pegged.
/r/MensRights27/04/24 10:51 PM
1

No, women aren't strong vicious or relentless. They are just duplicitous and slimy and covert about everything. You tell on yourself and show yourself to be a gyno centrist. Praising women for female vindictiveness and emotional machiavellianism is bad and should not be done. Women have weak moral characters, no matter emotionally aggressive they may be.
/r/MensRights27/04/24 10:43 PM
1

He's a cuckold.
/r/MensRights27/04/24 10:39 PM
1

Also, girls are most of the veterinarians and nurses. You're just taking part in the feminist grievance cult. Grow the fuck up. No one stops girls from doing anything and they literally predominate many medicinal fields. And construction is usually looked down upon. Amazing how when we talk about girls in construction its empowering, but when we talk about boys in construction its cause they are losers.
/r/MensRights27/04/24 10:38 PM
1

Because boys choose those higher paying professions. Boys don't "end up" there. They didn't slip on a banana peel and become an engineer. Girls likewise don't "end up" doing fashion or pyschology. They choose too. Boys are in those pforessions because they choose those professions and so they deserve the higher pay as well.
/r/MensRights27/04/24 10:36 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter