~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Has a woman ever randomly said she doesn't want to have sex with you in the middle of a non-sexual conversation?I’m not gonna lie, a lot of the advice saying to ignore what she’s saying sounds like it’s getting over into the predatory/rapey area. When somebody says no, you should listen. I agree with the bits saying to not get pissy/upset about it, that quippy comebacks are awesome, and that sometimes ppl do change their mind, but she could also just not be interested in you like that (because, ya know, she explicitly stated that she’s not and in my experience grown women know how to use words). She could… | /r/seduction | 01/11/21 01:54 PM |
| 0 | [deleted by user]I mean, I fundamentally disagree with you about making sure somebody is safe to invest your time in being equivalent to leading someone on or playing games. Playing games implies it’s frivolous, and leading someone on implies that she doesn’t care. You don’t legit shit test somebody if you don’t care about the response/the person giving the response. That’s just being an asshole. As for being straight up and honest about what you want, it’s more complicated than that. People can and will lie. Pe… | /r/seduction | 28/10/21 06:02 PM |
| 2 | [deleted by user]Shit tests are to see if the guy has major issues with anger, respecting a gal’s boundaries, or other red flags that could endanger her, right? For OP’s situation, it sounds more like she’s just being shitty than actually shit testing. Examples 1 and 3 I can kinda understand on their own, but 2 and 4 take it too far. There is a difference between checking if he’s going to potentially hurt you and going out of your way to be repeatedly and seriously shitty, just like there’s a difference between … | /r/seduction | 28/10/21 04:26 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter