TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Intelligent_Wind3299 Archive

View 2 posts and 63 comments by Intelligent_Wind3299 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

but then it would lead to women trapping men. so by your logic, it's better to trap men with kids that aren't theirs since it leads to a better outcome? lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/24 11:11 PM
2

dating "advice" that's hardly that. but if you need to a pretty face to tell you shit that most pick up as kids, so be it. and get vexed that I've dissed you. you dissed me. you're just a random stranger, so I'm not bothered either way. Keep on acting so suave and assured when you genuinely reckon people are never trite and are always serious. suave and assured people have fucked up perceptions of people and life, i guess.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/24 04:51 PM
0

if there ever was a bluepill, it's gullible people or those too blinded to see reality as it is. looks have always mattered, as has status.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/24 04:25 PM
1

no they cannot. maybe your church distorts scripture to be edgy. many of the Lord's commandments are eternal.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/24 09:51 AM
2

i don't believe that. that's a minority of people at best.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/24 09:14 AM
1

Not if one has no real experience attached. And women as people are different. Most dating gurus whether male or female draw on their experiences, and thus know how to engage with different kinds of people and in different situations. Unless she's a very haram Muslim, i dunno where her experience in dating comes from.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/24 08:32 AM
1

i dont' believe that. most learn that as little kids.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/24 09:50 PM
8

Helicopter parenting and the misleading of youth has led them to be socially inept and unaware. And lack basic life understandings.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/24 07:42 AM
2

is it common? I guess so. i don't think there's a way to accurately test its prevalence.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/24 08:21 PM
1

Dunno what your point is. Iq isn’t entirely reflective of intelligence. I didn’t even mention iq.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 07:51 AM
1

Iq isn’t even a definitive measure of intelligence. A person can be highly smart and have adhd for instance.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 07:25 AM
1

Maybe but not moral qualities. Though intelligence is somewhat relative. A person can be analytical but hold poor planning. Impulsivity has little to do with intelligence.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 06:47 AM
1

the history and humanity pills. it's just common sense. as men have traditionally ruled, then men are supposed to rule household and control their wives. why would it be the other way around? seems pretty straightforward. Are you saying that for most of human history, men haven't controlled women or had the upper hand in societies?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 01:13 AM
2

intelligence doesn't lend to any quality. that depends on a person's morals, values and upbringing. people can use intelligence for any end. it's like saying being friendly or outgoing are moral qualities, they're not.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 12:05 AM
1

Patriarchy. no other reason! lol. Men were supposed to dominate and rule women.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/24 09:07 PM
–

Broke men date broke women. Poor people date other poor people. You again cite this fallacy of everyone being super wealthy.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/24 07:24 AM
–

what? who are top ten hottest? money is objective, hotness is relative. you redpillers don't think well. so by your logic, hot women are rich. there aren't hot girls in poor schools, or in poor areas, or doing crappy jobs loool. ok. yep, everybody is rich. https://jooble.org/career-advice/how-many-people-make-over-100k-in-the-us/ yep, everybody is rich. that's NORMAL lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/24 06:28 PM
–

the redpill is to blame about having shitty attitudes of life. and yes, it is middle-eastern. that's got little to do with money, what am i depressed about? you seem such considering your reckon the world has to conform to how Yemeni or Omani Arabs date. you think all women care about extreme wealth? they all want seven figure dudes when only a minority earn seven figures?? haha
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/24 06:27 PM
–

that's actually the norm in most middle-eastern and/or Islamic countries. it's not xenophobia, but fact.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/24 02:30 PM
1

but the redpill and all of you say that's the norm. it's not. so your dating ideology doesn't even apply to most people.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/24 09:13 AM
1

what like if a person doesn't earn over 100k a year, they're done in dating?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/24 08:06 AM
1

bs. he says that to get dates one has to be wealthy. they're all fucking skewed asf.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/24 08:05 AM
1

there are plenty more hot people than rich people. hot people in any event will hook up with other hot people in their vicinity.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/24 08:05 AM
1

that's how middle-eastern men date. more cringe from the redpill. so then there should be some mass rat-race? ignores the fact people who aren't rich get plenty of dates.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/24 08:00 AM
1

Bs. But Redpilers reckon millionaires are the norm and not the exception so whatever
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/24 09:18 AM
1

how common is that though? is every moderately good-looking woman in a "shitty" job a sugar baby? i doubt it.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/24 06:13 PM
1

so they sell shit that most people know...looks and status matter. lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/24 06:12 PM
2

lovers don't need to have sex to be lovers.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/24 05:38 PM
2

that the redpill takes some viable truths but sells a crazy lifestyle that the 1% live and says get a net worth of $200m to get dates.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/24 03:50 PM
0

it's reality. most of their content is based on that. if there's one who an exception it's Hamza, since he talks mostly about game and looks and not being mega-rich. Samuels when he was alive, Tomassi, Fresh and Fit and the Tates all talked/talk about building mega-wealth. it's cringe.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/24 12:35 PM
1

Because looks give a greater chance of hooking up. That's pretty self-explanatory. our parents of average looks get with fellow people of average looks. this is who it always has been and still is. redpillers reckon that because social media has rightly distorted dating, that everybody is super-wealthy. they are taking a minority view of extreme wealth and portraying as the norm.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/24 10:43 AM
-2

what? that looks and status matter? this is open knowledge for like millennia. Redpill teaches men that a luxury lifestyle that most people don't live is the key to getting dates and sex. that's shit. Most people in the USA at least are of average means. most get dates. most do fine in dating of people of a similar level. These redpillers reckon that extreme wealth is the norm. https://jooble.org/career-advice/how-many-people-make-over-100k-in-the-us/ Is this is true, then that's a minority of p…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/24 10:30 AM
2

this is bs. people seek out relatioships for companionship as much if not more than sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/24 10:12 AM
1

You seem to watch footballers wives and think that’s all of life
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/24 08:47 AM
1

Resources can mean a stable home. Not being a millionaire
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/24 08:44 AM
1

See this is the issue. You all seek these exclusive lifestyles and reckon it’s a norm. Who owns yachts and how many do? Hot girls are a dime a dozen and come in all places. Do you people really believe most own eight cars? Your advice doesn’t translate to things most can have or get. It’s bs.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/24 08:43 AM
1

So again it’s about super wealth. are there no lower income hot girls?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/24 08:39 AM
1

Saying retarded crap like extreme wealth is the key isn’t it. Or prove most people are millionaires
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/24 08:38 AM
1

On that level I’d agree. But then never with crap that women only want extreme wealth
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/24 08:35 AM
2

Millionaires are a minority of people. That’s not the middle class by design. So Redpilers hVd childish appraisals of life?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/24 08:34 AM
1

So Redpilers concoct a fantasy that a Dubai lifestyle is the norm for eight billion people
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/24 08:33 AM
1

Many people aren’t. Dunno why you assume extreme wealth is the norm.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/24 08:32 AM
1

Ok so how Middle Eastern men date should be the norm? Most redpillers reckon it’s aboutbei g rich which is bs
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/24 08:30 AM
1

How many people are millionaires though? Redpill is bs as it teaches a limited lifestyle as the norm
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/24 08:15 AM
1

It’s amusing you think I’m blue pill. However telling guys money is it when most aren’t rich is bs.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/24 08:14 AM
1

You’re saying everyone is money hungry?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/24 08:12 AM
2

there are individual differences.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/24 04:00 PM
4

that's an overhyped RP talking point. Entitlement is relative and not everybody in modern society is entitled.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/24 03:34 PM
1

You're the one saying how a peson needs to know everything.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/24 03:33 PM
1

who ae these princesses? what some youtube redpillers think? cos they reckon women are gullible and believe everything they see and read on social media?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/24 03:09 PM
1

But recognising when has one gaps in knowledge is wise. nobody knows everything. knowledge is power. and with better knowledge, one can refine one's internal critiques of something. So you know everything and are never wrong then? lol
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/24 03:08 PM
0

That's your belief which not everybody would agree with. it's like asking a Muslim what Islam is about. if they say "praying five times a day" then that's part of it but not all of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/24 03:00 PM
-1

it's smart to know about something to know how to actively critique it. can't disagree with a strawman.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/24 02:54 PM
-2

I disagree. this depends onthe woman involved.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/24 02:54 PM
0

I'm not out to disprove. Just I'm sceptical about it and think it's BS. I just want to know if my critiques of it are accurate or not.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/24 02:44 PM
2

It's not about overthinking. I think it's BS. I just want to know what it's really about.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/24 02:43 PM
1

it's a bit arrogant to say people can only care about problems affect life or health.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/24 02:42 PM
-5

OK. I would agree looks matter. Money is moot, since not every person is expensive or money-hungry.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/24 02:40 PM
4

attraction is mostly non-negotiable but then this means cold approaching is hit and miss and a numbers game. nothing wrong with that.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/24 11:49 AM
–

I would say so, yes. because the thrill of "conquest" as it were is part of why casual sex is a thing. Whilst plenty of good looking men pay for sex, it's mainly due to it being an easy and low risk option.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/24 11:43 AM
–

No, since men would want to be proactive.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/24 11:41 AM
–

Some do. but then the expectation has been for men to approach women, and this is something that still holds.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/24 11:41 AM
–

it definitely stems from a more sexist time period. However, some women are lazy or just want their cake and eat it too.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/24 11:41 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter