TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

InternationalEye5713 Archive

View 0 posts and 62 comments by InternationalEye5713 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

"get anywhere near the same level of protection as pretty women inside their fertile age window then you clearly don't listen to a wide enough variety of women." the argument is that they get protection and weak men don't. never said anything about the level of protection. So you just admitted to my point. thanks for playing!
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/25 08:50 PM
1

i didn't say "doesn't get approached" i said "having equal levels of disinterest from the opposite sex" as in, whatever level of attraction other men around him are getting, he's not getting. NO ONE argued that men don't prefer submissive women, but what she described was not getting attention BEFORE THEY EVEN GOT TO KNOW HER PERSONALITY. HOW can they know she is submissive or not IF THEY HAVEN'T SPOKEN TO HER YET?? THEN, she clearly states that she's "more masculine" than other women around her…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/25 08:35 PM
1

ok sounds like mainstream feminist voices disagree with you but that's not my fight. back to the point though. Occam's razor. if she's not getting hit on, she's likely not attractive. if a man was having equal levels of disinterest from the opposite sex, we would assume they are unattractive. no one would agrue. but this really does sound like a case of "because she's a woman and you vowed to defend all women forever no matter the evidence" you even sitting here and typing "but but but maybe she…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/25 08:07 PM
1

I asked the original commenter to provide me even one example like the one you are saying you can provide me, they couldn't even do that. I just want to put it in context that the person you're defending said a blanket statement spoke in absolutes, and then double down and said that was not a hyperbolic comment. just so you know, this is the person you're siding with. and I just want to put it in context that the person you're defending said a blanket statement spoke in absolutes. however, you a…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/25 12:18 AM
1

How was the fantasy? Tell me right now you didn't make a blanket statement that you can't back up. Tell me now so I can label you a liar forever.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/25 11:12 PM
1

if I say you believe the sky is green and that you're an idiot because you believe that, should everyone trust my words? does anyone need to provide proof? are you allowed to push back? or no? I literally framed my last comment That way on purpose. you can say whatever you want, but if you're making blanket statements and can't handle the pushback, That's on you. end of story.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/25 11:11 PM
1

I haven't demanded anything. I asked you to provide proof for a blanket statement YOU MADE. and when I offered you an out you said it wasn't a hyperbolic statement. I even said you could give me ONE example of a red pill person saying what you claimed and you couldn't provide even that. now you're spiraling. talk about bad faith: "all the people I don't like believe X" "prove it" "there's no way to prove it! you're arguing in bad faith" get a fkn grip
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/25 11:08 PM
4

ugly, old, and lesbian women are still protected. it's not all about sex. try again
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/25 10:17 PM
1

"if she gave off an unapproachable vibe and never hung out places where she could be approached, she could look like anything and not get approached." not according to some women. they will confidently say: "you can dress like a nun and men will still make sexual advances toward you." if all it takes to get rid of unwanted sexual attention is to live a boring life, then why do women act as if it is some big issue that needs to be addressed?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/25 09:59 PM
–

exactly. don't make unfounded blanket statements that can't be proven. especially if you can't handle the backlash of someone calling you on it. simple as that.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/25 08:38 PM
1

Wait can you actually point to the what I made up? I actually want to know what I made up? you led with that sentence so it had to be from something but please tell me what I fabricated? If you can't answer this question then I'll assume you've bowed out.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/25 06:48 PM
1

I asked for proof lol. why is this so confusing? you sending me a disassociated phrase is not proof. wtf is happening today? lol
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/25 06:35 PM
1

you haven't provided evidence.. everything you have stated I can find women stating from the other side of the aisle. "red pill men constantly blame women for the actions of men (yeah he was abusive but you chose him, while not holding the man accountable for his shitty actions; blaming women and female nature for their dating woes and often being incredibly adamant that they aren't contributing in any way, etc., etc.)." How else Can you hold someone accountable that you do not know other than c…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/25 06:26 PM
-3

cool. now can you prove "Red pill believes women should take accountability for their actions as well as the actions of men, while men have no accountability for essentially anything." ?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/25 06:15 PM
1

omg. What am I making up? All I did was ask for proof and quote you? JEsus. I know this will just go on all day. you could just say "yes, my claim was hyperbolic" " no, I don't have proof" " no, I don't know that most red pill men believe that men aren't accountable for anything" but instead...
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/25 06:14 PM
1

All I did was ask for proof. I made no claims. I didn't attack any straw man. I asked you a question you could not answer. and at the height of your pride and inability to be humble, you couldn't admit that you had no proof for your claim. and for the viewers at home that claim was "Red pill believes women should take accountability for their actions as well as the actions of men, while men have no accountability for essentially anything. " That's a very specific. very detailed belief that you a…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/25 06:06 PM
–

cool. now can you prove "Red pill believes women should take accountability for their actions as well as the actions of men, while men have no accountability for essentially anything." ?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/25 06:04 PM
1

Yes, I moved the goal post because you couldn't meet the goal. now you're doing a bunch of mental gymnastics when you can just admit you don't have proof that red pillers. How could ever be poor logical reasoning to ask for proof when you are making unfounded blanket statements. Your pseudo intellectual diatribe won't save you here. You made a claim that you cannot back up, and now you seem irritated that I called you on it. You saying you know what someone believes and then in the same breath s…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/25 05:55 PM
–

"Watching what people say online is watching what they do" ??? so this is not a logical debate? When people say "watch they do not what they say" they quite literally mean what they DO. "you have to make such determination based on the evidence that is available. For some things, more evidence is available than others." i asked for evidence, you couldn't provide any. Hell, I'll even accept one comment where a self proclaimed red piller claims that they "believe women should take accountability f…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/25 05:38 PM
–

false equivalency: unless you have met and observed these men IN PERSON and not online then you cannot say you are acting on "what they do". When people (not just red pilers by the way) say "watch what they do" they mean examine behavior and act accordingly. You made a claim about what they "believe" which can only really be expressed verbally. it would take a whole lot of action to prove beyond a doubt that someone quote: "believes women should take accountability for their actions as well as t…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/25 05:16 PM
–

because i didn't make a claim, i asked question. what's the confusion here?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/25 05:03 PM
–

can you prove beyond anecdote that this is what all or even most red pillers believe? from what i've heard they want women to have equal levels of accountability. Can you show me unwavering concrete proof that they want what you claim?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/25 04:25 PM
3

"Example- male mental health is not taken seriously because you need to be more manly and less like an emotional woman. There aren't any examples can think of that wouldn't circle back to "be a man because being a woman is bad." " weak man =/= woman. you would need to provide proof beyond anecdotal that most men or any men believe that weak man equals woman. Men say all the time that weak men are bad. for most of our history It has been proven in society that weak men/ poor men/ low status men a…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/25 01:38 PM
1

Occam's razor. you don't need to do mental gymnastics When the answer is staring you right in the face. I would actually like to know why you would automatically assume this woman is attractive When all the evidence points to her not being attractive? Is it because she's a woman and you vowed to defend all women forever no matter the evidence? I'd truly like to know
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/25 01:26 PM
0

If you are a grown woman in a relationship that you feel isn't good for you, it's your own damn fault. end of story. If being with men doesn't give you enough positives to balance out negatives and you still choose to be with a man, then you're an idiot. full stop. there are many women who can give you their lived. experiences of how being with a man is a good thing. If you can't, and your experience is that you've haven't been able to attain that type of man, then go be by yourself. and since y…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/25 01:18 PM
1

nope. we're just saying you weren't as attractive as you think you were. That can be true and you can also date men that you want to date. two things can be true at the same time. we all know dating is typically easier for women.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/25 11:38 AM
2

there isn't nuance needed. I swear redditors cry "nuance" As if it's needed in every situation. women will literally spend hours on the internet complaining about being hit on. they'll say they've been hit on since they were 12 years old. they'll complain That thirsty dudes ruin all their favorite spots and all they want to do is run their errands or have fun with their friends and guys ruin that by hitting that on them all the time. they'll say that it doesn't matter what you wear, that you cou…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/25 11:36 AM
21

there's nothing wrong with it but also no one owes you accommodation for your lack of resilience
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/25 09:40 PM
6

or.. you're weren't as attractive as think you were. simple. no other explanation needed. most average women can tell you countless times they have been hit on or have had sexual advances made by men of almost every age. its very likely that you and your friends were below average at least compared to whoever else was accessible around you.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/25 08:11 PM
13

simple solution: you're weren't as attractive as think you were. If you were, you would NEVER say you didnt have enough men (of any age) interested in you. Also, opinionated means nothing upon first glance, they don't know you, just how you look. and the "little masculine" can go along way in the eyes of men just like "a little feminine" goes along way in the eyes of women. THAT'S what likely deterred any socially successful man from pursuing you more than anything else
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/25 07:22 PM
11

why did this become an attack on op? I swear you guys always do this just because you don't like someone's opinion. you start attacking them. now it becomes there's something wrong with op at an individual level if no one prefers them. where did that ​BS diatribe come from? are you really that angry and bitter inside that you have to turn everything into an attack just because you don't like how somebody framed a post? attack their words attack their ideas but why attack them personally? (And I'…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/25 12:57 PM
0

crash out? you're crashing out right now. I don't care that you're a woman. I care that you tried to speak for all women. I would do the same if a man tried to speak for all men. get over yourself. no one cares that you have a vagina between your legs. I care about your moral inconsistency, you freak. edit: whoops! I didn't realize you weren't the original commenter, You're just a weirdo with too much time on your hands, interjecting into a conversation that had nothing to do with you. begone.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/25 12:37 PM
2

not a troll. I literally set up a debate and you bowed out. Don't blame me because you can't debate in a debate sub. How am I grasping at straws when I literally just described what you did which was act as the spokesperson for all women. crazy how women will come here and say women aren't a monolith until they want to speak for all women. and then redditors like you will say anyone's a troll just because you don't want to engage in their debate points. It's pathetic.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/25 01:08 AM
2

that's a great non answer for having no rebuttal. good one
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/25 01:00 AM
4

Op asked a question. you made a statement. Where's the confusion here? If you're being intentionally hyperbolic say it or use /s. nothing in your post sounded intentionally hyperbolic. I honestly think you're just trying to reframe your comment after the fact.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/25 12:35 AM
10

Women aren't a monolith and yet here you are attempting to speak for all women. Do you have a link to the news article where they all voted you their spokesperson?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/25 12:02 AM
1

That's fine. I don't care. you violated the rules of this sub end of story. you can look down on the Trump supporter and not spew personal attacks. grow up
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/25 02:57 PM
–

bullshit. you knew what you were doing
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/25 02:51 PM
2

technically he said women not "all women". and blue pillars and feminists typically argue that when women say men are trash they "don't mean all men" and if you weren't one of the men they were talking about You shouldn't be offended. Why doesn't that same rule apply in this case?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/25 02:47 PM
0

yeah if you're a straight man and a lesbian woman sure. but If you're a straight woman saying this and truly believing it, you need to reevaluate your sexuality
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/25 02:42 PM
–

no personal attacks. this is against the rules of this sub. why do yall always do this just because you don't like someone's opinion or stance in life?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/25 02:39 PM
1

worth it
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/25 07:06 PM
1

you really shouldn't be a moderator at all. they must have a low bar for that. never knew
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/25 02:20 PM
4

"women are not a monolith" "guys should just learn to differentiate when any and every woman is into them or not with the zero mistakes. no, it's not ever a woman's fault for not communicating clearly"
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/25 02:17 PM
1

That's a good non answer for having no rebuttal. It seems the people agree with me because of how low this post is voted
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/25 11:49 PM
0

exactly I said your post is moot and built on anecdotal evidence based on What you specifically seek out and engage with. and somehow you had an issue with you that, When you literally just basically repeated what I said. It doesn't matter if this post is about women. If you say dogs aren't smart and someone asks you compared to what other species, and you have no answer for that; then you quite literally do not have a point. If it's compared to other dogs you quite literally do not have point. …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/25 11:42 PM
1

My second ask was my first because I literally quoted myself... regardless, If you claim that men aren't intelligent because they don't understand other types of intelligence that you deem more valuable, then who is truly intelligent if women display the same behavior? what's the bar? you need to prove first that men do this more than women and that they claim these things more than women do. and that they display less competence in these types of intelligence that you deem more valuable. you ha…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/25 11:32 PM
1

provided context not proof. I'm not sure what you're not understanding. your whole premise is that men, men and large think that they're the most intelligent people on Earth. That shouldn't be a problem if women also display the same behaviors online. which they do. you can't see that because you're biased.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/25 11:16 PM
0

AGAIN: "how can you prove men do this more than women do? if you can't, then you're entire post is moot and built on anecdotal assumptions based on the content that is being fed to you because of what and who you choose to engage with."
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/25 08:55 PM
1

first, this first sentence needs some actual proof: "I’ve noticed that men of Reddit and forums claim to be the most intelligent men who have ever graced earth" how can you prove men do this more than women do? if you can't, then you're entire post is moot and built on anecdotal assumptions based on the content that is being fed to you because of what and who you choose to engage with.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/25 07:23 PM
1

oh well in that case your opinions means less than most since you're willing to excuse blatant blanket statement lies just because you weren't able to tell the truth either. saying "looks dont matter" isnt just a small lie because someone isnt attractive to you; its gaslighting and perpetuates a harmful narrative that sows seeds of resentment every time it isn't observable (which it rarely is imo). not to attack though, i understand where you're coming from
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/25 07:14 PM
2

but they really should've picked better. that's not an insult and it's not even always about picking a good guy: before they had UNPROTECTED SEX they could've PICKED USING A CONDOM. or maybe should've PICKED USING BIRTH CONTROL or maybe should've PICKED TRACKED THEIR OVULATION CYCLE or maybe any other number of things before literally choosing to bringing a child into this world.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/25 06:48 PM
1

why the respect? the blatantly lied at the beginning and then backtracked. why do you have no issue with liars?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/25 06:44 PM
1

there's nothing to provide examples for. I didn't make any claims of a specific type of relationship. I'm worried you can't understand sentence structure.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/25 02:55 PM
0

examples aren't needed in this context. try again. You're not smart or nuanced enough to understand that you can be 50/50 and provide for your partner at the same time​. "providing" isn't just monetary support. If you think providing is just monetary support then most women provide men with nothing at all. Most mature men aren't okay with just sex in a relationship, there has to be more. If you are claiming that providing only equals adding money to a relationship then you are also claiming that…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/25 01:24 PM
1

didn't read anything I wrote huh?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/25 01:18 PM
1

I'd argue truly mentally healthy women don't marry men like that. either she's not healthy enough to see the warning signs or isn't healthy enough to take enough time before MARRIAGE to fully and thoroughly vet a man. Either way, most people attract people like themselves. If you find yourself with the worst version of the opposite sex, you're likely the worst version of your own sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/25 10:37 PM
1

this sounds like a "femcel" post. i think its pretty clear by now that if you are truly unable to lock down a good man or woman (or even experience a good version of the opposite sex at some point in your existence) then you are the problem. If the men you have chosen to be around or pay attention to are all only useful for their money and nothing else then that a you problem, not a man problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/25 10:15 PM
1

so? her options are still as limited as they were before and she will likely either choose to be single or date a similar man. either way they BOTH are in a position to choose to be single. she (likely) isn't any more valuable than he is if she couldn't secure a better man from the get go.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/25 10:06 PM
1

but according to women on here he can choose to be alone (and i'm sure you've advised men to make that choice before). so he is always in a "position to choose." so your premise is flawed. If a women "settles" for that type of man, she is in the same position he is. her options are limited.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/25 09:59 PM
0

many women claim that "providing" doesn't only equal money. That's how those women justify being shallow when demanding a provider above all else. You can provide and be a 50/50 person. you can also provide for someone who is providing for you. its not a zero sum game
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/25 09:55 PM
1

nah he's right, your rhetoric is almost identical to that of a blue pill incel boogeyman: "women i met in my life were mean to me so all women are like that!" "proof?, what's that?"
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/25 07:49 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter