TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

InternationalStudio Archive

View 0 posts and 128 comments by InternationalStudio on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

Ah that’s not what I meant. It’s nice to see women enjoying themselves and thriving in the chaos on PPD, as opposed to the over-moderated communities in reddit’s fempire. Ideological enemies to friends (or at least respected enemies) is nice to see too. Rather than being ghettoized into “acceptable” subreddits.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/18 06:37 PM
1

Girls like to trade insults and retorts too. Lots of Benedick-Beatrice stuff in PPD, lul. There’s always been issues with quality control and indulging negative attitudes in these communities. Nothing new under the sun 🙃 http://www.sosuave.net/forum/threads/how-to-spot-a-dj.143697/
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/18 06:30 PM
4

Red Pill would ideally be an ethos, not a dogma. Be open-minded, don’t take words at face value, and don’t project on women what you wish to be true. Of course it gets more complicated given everyone’s deep emotional investments around sex and dating. PPD is better at being critical than the RP sub, honestly.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/18 06:21 PM
6

Nobody who’s successful and happy is going to spend a ton of time around negative, struggling people (without a reason). People absorb what’s useful and then move on. Purple Pill is a discussion forum for diverse people who like arguing on even terms about things that are decidedly non-PC. It’s a very different place IMO.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/18 06:15 PM
4

It’s gotta be a demographic thing. Or maybe us dysfunctional types all run together.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/18 03:16 PM
1

“I’m not bad, I’m just drawn that way”
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/18 03:28 PM
1

I don’t think all vets are broken. But they’re clearly in a minority that a lot of people don’t understand and won’t ever be familiar with.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/18 03:28 PM
2

What's really interesting is taking men's reactions to a woman's engagement ring in context to what happens when a man puts on a wedding ring: he gets hit on more often. Women = confirmed scumbags?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/18 10:57 AM
1

I guess the wall is more men's problem than women's problem then I’d agree with you in a lot of ways, honestly. I wish I had the “wife goggles” instead of always finding out a girl is half my age when flirting with an attractive stranger.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/18 10:55 AM
1

If you don’t care for revenge, it’s just kind of sad seeing all the vibrant young women you knew and desired when younger get old. First, because you miss how beautiful they were. Second, because you wish you could still see them that way.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/18 08:54 PM
1

It’s a fun question for those interested in moral philosophy. Is it worth building a happy, prosperous society for the majority if it’s founded on the fundamental oppression of a minority? I’d accept it as the benefit to humans overall is so heavily weighted in one direction so as to make me almost a moral monseter for not taking it. Some people would say the exact opposite. At what point does those scales tip? How much do we value one human’s happiness and well-being over another’s? That’s why …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/18 07:26 PM
1

Interesting response. One of my favorite authors was Fyodor Dostoyevsky, here’s a passage from him. “Imagine that you are creating a fabric of human destiny with the object of making men happy in the end, giving them peace and rest at last, but that it was essential and inevitable to torture to death only one tiny creature — that baby beating its breast with its fist, for instance — and to found that edifice on its unavenged tears, would you consent to be the architect on those conditions? Tell …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/18 05:21 PM
2

Unpopular kids are already encouraged to fight each other. Or at least, I remember one incident from my school (age 12-13). Systemizing that would create one of those monstrosities where the human race is no longer worth saving. Valuing all human life as having inherent worth is important. The criteria for devaluation changes, but you probably understand enough of human history that solutions to troublesome people don’t usually reflect too well on those that implement them.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/18 09:11 PM
1

Is this elaborate trolling, or a very sly dig at modern media? A new Black Mirror episode, maybe? If that’s how we treated the most isolated and socially vulnerable members of our society, it wouldn’t be worthwhile protecting those people who blithely accepted that status quo!
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/18 08:36 PM
2

People will literally die for total strangers out of altruism. The good comes with the bad. Dating is fucked up now because communities have been obliterated by urbanization, technology, and the global economy. There is no such thing as consequence-free promiscuity. It’s taking the time traditionally used to forge solid committed relationships in your teens and early 20’s, when you also knew potential partners outside of a dating context, and forcing committment between random strangers with zer…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/18 02:34 PM
2

The joys of dating in your 30’s I guess....
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/18 02:27 PM
1

When I asked where the equivalent list of tips for men to adhere to, in order to avoid leading on a woman, I got a lot of blabbering, male defenses and then ultimately silence. That’s the argument towards “not all people are like that”. Men are men, women are women, but a some people are more empathetic (and less hypocritical) than others.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/18 02:25 PM
1

Bad bot
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/18 11:00 PM
1

I’m talking about YOU. Things like this sound retarded: Why the hell would a guy move to another Continent when the national product is better than what the rest of the world has to offer Portugal has plenty of hot people, some are even Portuguese and under 40, but it’s certainly not “better than what the rest of the world has to offer”. And that’s a weak-ass excuse to know nothing about the world if you intend to pass judgement on it. Countries like Japan, Korea, and Taiwan are more prosperous …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/18 10:58 PM
1

The girls I’ve liked most in Portugal have been: Argentinian Venezuelan Brazilian French German Italian-Chinese 50/50 Russian South Korean Portugal’s a great place (I’m here until November for now) but the people aren’t noticeably hotter than a lot of other places I’ve lived or visited. The world is so multicultural now, any major city will have tons of people from everywhere. Hong Kong, Tokyo, Taipei, Lisbon, absolutely. Ditch the pseudo-ethnonationalism. Once again, very Red Pill of you.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/18 10:58 PM
1

Why, is she Brazilian? Good thinking menino. Lul
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/18 06:58 PM
1

I mentioned Hong Kong in an edit above. Get out of Europe more homie
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/18 06:18 PM
2

Japan’s not third world, Hong Kong has a per capita income twice that of Paris. Nice rant tho
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/18 06:01 PM
4

Humour requires a bit of social sense. Better humour — edging much closer to inappropriate — requires better social acuity. Higher social acuity is a demonstration of intelligence, intelligence is useful to the tribe, being useful means you’re a better mating prospect. So basically: if the women don’t find you handsome, they should at least find you handy.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/18 01:09 PM
2

For a sub that debates in some of the most acrimonious subjects on reddit, I’m impressed by how evenhanded a lot of commentators are.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/18 01:55 AM
1

Women care about how guys make them feel. Looks can help but it’s not 100% of the battle.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/18 01:51 AM
2

That’s some funny shit. And accurate
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/18 01:49 AM
2

The neg is “You’re beautiful, but so what”. The qualification is “Tell me 3 things about yourself that make you worth knowing” and needs to be immediate so the neg can’t be challenged.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/18 01:47 AM
2

That’s an insult with all the subtlety of a sledgehammer, not a good neg. A classy neg is like “many people are beautiful. You’re beautiful. But so what! It’s only skin deep. Tell me 3 things about yourself that make you worth knowing, that have nothing to do with your looks”. The point is to level the playing field. Being needlessly confrontational is a whole other ball game, and should be a lot more playful.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/18 01:59 AM
2

Looking at the retweets and likes, a lot of women seem to agree with her Well, like u/RockinSocksII said, a lot of women are cunts. If you’re a cunty woman, wouldn’t it be to your advantage to project “all women are like that?” Now ask yourself where you’ve heard that line before.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/18 10:46 AM
2

I blame marketers
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/18 11:31 AM
2

I'm afraid Mother didn't have much of a sense of humor. Obviously, it skipped a generation. Poor mom
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/18 10:24 AM
1

It’s a family of personality disorders in the DSM-IV manual.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/18 10:22 AM
4

There’s a ton of info on this in clinical psychology because most abusers hail from the cluster B family, and a lot of the abused are rescuers trying to heal their own internal traumas by proxy.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/18 12:23 AM
1

Right.. but TRP is also a stealth support community. That’s the draw. Validation and identification is hell of a drug. That’s what draws people into any group, and that’s why saying “X group is better” fundamentally misunderstands the processes that are driving group loyalty.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/18 04:43 PM
1

It’s a professional psychiatrist giving advice. Anonymous crowdsourced advice is about as trustworthy as you’d expect
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/18 04:16 PM
1

Well, it’s a magnet for the maladjusted. Notice what you mentioned were all authors, not communities?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/18 09:38 AM
1

other women quietly seethe in jealousy on the other side of the room This can be quite useful, I think. It doesn’t hurt that confidently flirtatious female friends will peel away male competition.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/18 09:31 AM
1

I think you’ll have to use your imagination.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/18 06:44 PM
2

You’ve seen this study: http://bigthink.com/paul-ratner/why-bullies-have-more-sex Younger adolescents lower in ‘Honesty-Humility’ may therefore strategically manipulate others in a variety of ways to obtain more sexual partners... Our findings indirectly suggest that exploitative adolescents may have more sexual partners if they are able to strategically use exploitative behaviour like bullying to target weaker individuals.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/18 12:11 PM
1

It’s been done. https://www.geneseo.edu/sites/default/files/sites/health/2008_Serano_Why_Nice.pdf For whatever reason, the idea doesn’t generate much traction.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/18 11:05 AM
1

Cheers, enjoyed that link. I wonder what the next “evolution” is going to be.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/18 03:11 PM
1

RP didn’t split from PUA, it’s simply a subset of it. Rollo used to cut his teeth over on the SoSuave forum, Mark Manson simply rebranded himself and worked in attachment theories from mainstream pychology, most of RP’s darker side is simply endless variations on what Roosh/Roissy were doing years ago, and the positive self-improvement aspects are straight up stolen from Pook. Maybe this is all semantics, but authenticity was always a big deal. What RP did in practice was establish a huge commun…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/18 11:29 AM
3

Look at 100m sprinters. Anaerobic and conditioning work isn’t very popular for non-athletes, but it’s obviously got visible benefits.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/18 11:11 AM
2

It’s a different skill set.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/18 08:49 PM
8

Is the plan to attract the most unstable and damaged women and then confirm to yourself that women are awful? If you grow up in a dysfunctional setting, often you naturally gravitate to dysfunctional people. RP doesn’t dig into mental health and clinical psychology, though it’s probably quite relevant. You do need strategies. Conversely, lack of nuance (idealization vs. devaluation) is something RP has a real problem with. Hilariously enough, so does BP. But what do I know? I’m just a woman who …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/18 08:49 PM
16

Misery loves company
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/18 06:30 PM
1

I’ve never knowingly led a man on knowing he wants more and using him as an emotional or financial crutch - that’s despicable to me. On par with men pretending to be interested in more and then bailing when they get sex. That’s essentially a push-pull act. Those girls and guys both understand either consciously or unconsciously, honesty wouldn’t make much difference.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/18 09:58 AM
1

Next time I find hairy, oil-free gladiators banging bored and horny Roman housewives after fighting each other to the death, you’ll be the first to know.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/18 12:28 AM
2

Spartacus?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/18 06:17 PM
1

People like thinkin’
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/18 07:05 AM
1

I can't figure out why it would be. I read this once elsewhere: Society/friends/family all pressure us from a young age to find a super successful guy, and they constantly question us if we get a BF on what their status is like, what job they have, how much they earn, their education, their height. It's not that women just want the perfect man, it's just that we personally get SHIT ON by those around us if we settle for anything less than perfect. If I settle for a guy that is my height or short…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/18 12:13 AM
2

If they’re 20.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/18 09:08 AM
1

Supportive without any expectation of reciprocation. Willing to satisfy her every need. Maintains the surroundings so his wife can focus on enriching himself. Devoted, despite his own needs. This would be just as unhealthy if gender-reversed, and just as destructive for the kids. The relationship you’ve sketched out is that of a narcissist and an enabler, where the narcissist always comes first. Yes, it’s terrible for children. No, it’s not confined to men.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/18 08:57 AM
0

He's committed to their mother and likes to make her happy So, given the spirit of your analogy, does also that mean the mother is competing for attention and resources against the children? Kind of playing into typical RP “most responsible teenager in the house” misogyny, aren’t you?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/18 02:16 AM
3

If she’s not good to you, she won’t be good to your kids. Next, lots of men can be self-sacrificing. If they expect something in return, it’s a covert contract (niceguy-ism). If they expect nothing in return, they are doormats. What exactly do you think men are supposed to do here? A relationship depends on two partners. Once you ascribe agency to women, it means they can fuck it up.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/18 05:40 PM
3

Yeah it’s just self-awareness. Though the “women’s solidarity” angle might cause some issues unless she puts the advisee’s welfare first (ie. her sons). I think there was some study about gender loyalty in those respects, women won’t want to trash other women to men (even justifiably). Men don’t really care about trashing eachother.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/18 03:31 PM
1

You've got to consider that women aren't a hivemind. They aren't lying If they’re not a hivemind, some are probably truthful and some are probably lying (or more charitably, just lack self-awareness), right?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/18 03:26 PM
1

You have totally missed the point by not interpreting the analogy. It’s about advice errors in the spirit of “do as I say, not as I do”. Gender-switched example, it’s like younger guys saying “don’t wear makeup!” when they simply like a more natural look on a woman. Or guys giving natural training advice, when their edge comes from anabolic steroids. You can’t always take people at face value — that’s not bad advice either!
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/18 03:23 PM
3

Your gaggle is the group of guys in your life who you might not be “dating,” but who play different roles, fulfill different needs, and help you figure out who you are and what you want. Though no two gaggles are alike, there are ten types of men a gaggle might include, such as the Ego Booster, the Hot Sex Prospect, and the Boyfriend Prospect. Romance, excitement, self-discovery, love…all this will be yours, once you start thinking of each man you know and meet as a potential guy in your gaggle.…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/18 11:22 PM
3

Negativity. Holy fuck the negativity. You do need to be careful with women, but being unable to shut off the vigilance and devaluation will cost you life satisfaction. Yes if you get played, you might lose. But if you never really enjoy companionship, it’s not much better. Be aware, then turn the computer off and go outside. I once read “dating should be 90% fun and 10% tactics”. If you’re not or can’t enjoy it, something has gone wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/18 08:37 PM
2

“You are all equally worthless in my eyes”
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/18 11:38 PM
1

Interesting stat, do you have a link?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/18 10:57 AM
1

Off topic but that’s a dope username.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/18 02:38 AM
12

Either way bullying didn’t conclusively reduce success. Let’s leave it at that. Moving on, I think a lot of manosphere types previously idealized women, and that’s also what drives the deliberate misogyny. It’s like bracketing artillery. A big correction will make a guy go from idealization to devaluation. An accurate view of women will lie somewhere in between.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/18 08:24 PM
15

Being unpleasant (which includes entitled, rude, douchey...) makes people not want to do things with you. This extends to women having sex with you. Not true, there’s at least one recent study tracking how teen bullies are more sexually successful than highly conscientious kids. http://bigthink.com/paul-ratner/why-bullies-have-more-sex It may differ across age cohorts, but women are most definitely not arbiters of morality when it comes to sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/18 07:57 PM
2

What’s the alternative? Spend your youth productively contributing to your society and community? If you’re frozen out of love, sex, and relationships, you might as well not exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/18 07:49 PM
2

Exactly.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/18 01:24 PM
2

But what about male models?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/18 08:25 AM
3

But what about male models
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/18 11:11 PM
2

I mean I always liked the more aloof dudes I couldn’t wrap around my finger immediately Now you’ve got it. Negs can be very subtle. If you’re interacting with a woman within her friend group, don’t give her much attention, don’t affirm her statements, close off your body language, be a little dismissive (but not overtly!). People understand non-verbal language very well, group dynamics, etc. When two girls talk over each other, they notice which one you respond to. So while the linked examples a…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/18 11:00 PM
1

That’s one of the major problems with PUA as it existed back then. With experience, you can tell. But negs were sold as some magic bullet, and they’re a terrible tool for a woman who’s not interested in those interpersonal status games. Negs are also very useful in dealing with male competition, though they were called AMOG or something. Same shit though. Here’s an example if you’re interested, lol. http://www.seductionbase.com/seduction/cat/In_the_Middle/AMOG/121.html "dude.. you're a pretty co…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/18 09:25 PM
2

Negging isn’t teasing, literally nobody on reddit understands it. It’s supposed to be an attack on the ego. http://www.theattractionforums.com/showthread.php?t=66 Imagine now, a guy comes along and says "Nice nails. Are they real?" She will have to concede, "No, acrylic." And he says (like he didn't notice it was a put down), "Oh. (pause) well I guess they still look good." Then he turns his back to her. It’s absolutely manipulative. Moreover it’s necessary when you realize you’re dealing with a…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/18 08:52 PM
1

Typically income from growth of capital exceeds income from employment, which creates a society of rich and poor. Middle classes are historically atypical.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/18 12:01 AM
1

Good point. I don’t think any gender has a monopoly on retardation
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/18 11:50 PM
1

The middle of the 20th century was a massive historical exception in terms of democratic rights and economic equality. u/neverfearlife is correct that historically, average women worked in some capacity.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/18 11:47 PM
1

I don’t agree but you clearly have your mind made up, so let’s get on with happily enjoying our lives, since I don’t think there’s much room for discussion here. Take care.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/18 11:19 PM
1

No, it's not red pill. Yes, it is. They are on exactly the same page as you regarding looks, race, low T, etc. I’m not digging through their forum (because I have better things to do) but social status, confidence, gender roles and masculinity don’t exist in some mythical vacuum disconnected from aesthetics. I really hope that wasn’t the substance of your argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/18 01:46 PM
1

So your takeaway is: Asian/Indian Short Skinny Poor Is a low value male. That’s a very Red Pill opinion of you. Not saying you’re wrong though. The takeaway message is that hot women date hot men Meaningless until you tear apart what “hot” is for men. And that’s what drives toxic masculinity in the first place, and why Watson shouldn’t say it’s ok to reject gender roles if she doesn’t understand the consequences of doing so. As you’ve eloquently argued, women’s sexuality is not all that progress…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/18 07:41 PM
2

A lot of men have low self control. Sluts are easy and accessible by definition.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/18 03:43 PM
1

What is WRONG with feminism It’s wrong when it misrepresents reality, like any other ideology. Watson said “I’ve seen men made fragile and insecure by a distorted sense of what constitutes male success”. So when a 5’ 100# Indian/Asian guy (who probably grew up on Harry Potter) sees a high-value woman like Watson dating your 6’6” white brickhouse IRL, what’s the takeaway message about actual male value and masculinity? But she had a sexy voice, and she had a sensual way about how she spoke and wa…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/18 03:34 PM
1

I’m not talking about all young women, just the examples of Watson and Larsson. Incidentally, I guess you asked that “wouldn’t stop talking about tall guys for 30 minutes” woman out for her social skills, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/18 12:10 PM
1

Go lurk r9k, it’s hilarious. Poor fuckers (we’re worse, though)
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/18 01:31 AM
4

Exactly. So let’s not sugarcoat that fact, please. As a young man, if you desire women and can’t be appropriately masculine for them, expect to be lonely.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/18 09:25 PM
2

Chasing girls is not attractive in general. The younger girl needs to initiate in a lot of these cases (though that’s just my experience). I mostly meet college grads who are travelling. Independence and maturity are important. I mostly meet smart multilingual girls who are in some kind of professional capacity but not yet established (MD’s, therapists, vets, OT, medtech, etc). I’d have had a hard time dating them at the same age. You’d think the age gap would be awkward but they like the fact I…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/18 09:16 PM
1

Women who don’t mind age gaps have made me more open-minded, honestly. My feelings on social judgement now are “don’t begrudge other people for how they find their happiness.” It would be a miserable world if we simply lived to conform to what other people judged best for us. I definitely didn’t see things that way when I was a teen or college kid. I was uncomfotable dating out of my school year!
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/18 08:55 PM
3

Some women probably do experience a visceral "ewww" when thinking about older men chasing teenagers. Makes sense. But there’s a big difference between the abstract “37 year old” and a fit and a funny guy who’s polite and charming, and also 37. Be an upstanding individual and it’s even better. It is possible to win people over on age gaps, even if they are against you on principle.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/18 08:08 PM
6

It’s maybe also because being in close proximity to someone and not finding something of value in them except a few holes is anti-validation (in certain respects).
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/18 07:08 PM
2

They sure aren’t. But if you don’t cater to the customer, your restaurant will struggle. And in this case, there’s not a huge market for underdone steak. Better to be on the charred side. Any more cute analogies for me?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/18 07:03 PM
1

prisoner's dilemma For your interest. http://www.spectacle.org/995/love.html
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/18 06:36 PM
6

I kind of liked it in the early 90’s when riot grrls were still around. Of course I had a lot of teenage delusions back then.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/18 06:33 PM
9

Social and sexual exclusion is even more toxic than bullying, and that’s what happens to guys who don’t make the cut for baseline masculinity. That’s why it’s embarassing to lecture about “toxic masculinity” when you’re simultaneously reinforcing what’s necessary to qualify as a man. I mean, isn’t the biggest laughingstock on reddit r/incels, who are men defined by not measuring up in the eyes of women?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/18 06:27 PM
9

So do it like they do. Date a super model or date a beautiful actress. Oh, wait. You can't? Too bad. You are totally missing the point. The issue is not them dating hot guys. It’s the percieved hypocrisy in obscuring what they actually find attractive. “I want tall, dark, and handsome” is fine. It’s all the virtue-signalling blather about valuing guys for non-masculine qualities when in reality, that’s what is desired.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/18 06:16 PM
10

I think feminism serves as a catch-all for most change that has occured due to technology, urbanization, and modernity. Imagine how modern dating would look if birth control and reliable social welfare didn’t exist. Feminism can’t supersede practical concerns.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/18 06:11 PM
7

Don't keep orbiters; it's unkind. Man, I would love this to become the prevailing social sentiment.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/18 05:50 PM
1

Having deep or ideological conversations on the first date doesn't seem strange to me Deep and ideological doesn’t imply contentious and divisive. It can bond. Your guy was too heavy on the ‘pick up’ and too light on the ‘artist’. Seduction is not just coming on strong, it’s also drawing out vulnerability and similarity. Real connection is what elevates but it’s something that defies tactics and dogma.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/18 11:39 AM
2

It’s a problem for people who need commitment. You’d need to discuss the psychological needs of humans to give a definitive answer to that, and that’s a long conversation.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/18 11:29 AM
0

It’s emotional dysregulation. Lashing out regulates the emotion.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/18 06:23 PM
1

Those three points going mainstream are huge though. If you don’t expect loyalty from women you won’t consider commitment as a viable option.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/18 06:09 PM
1

What a chump that guy was
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/18 07:52 PM
1

We are starting to see women start committing mass suicide Source?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/18 07:11 PM
1

If I was attracted to her, yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/18 08:16 PM
1

I don’t disqualify by age. The problem is staying attractive as you get older. Because if you’re not attracted to your partner, why would you have a sexual relationship with them? You probably saw this OKCupid article about age. It’s not fair at all, but it’s not good to be ignorant either! https://jezebel.com/mens-favorite-ages-are-20-21-22-and-23-a-data-dive-1731660984
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/18 08:09 PM
1

That whole concept pisses me off. There’s no equality in the dating sphere. Men and women lead different lives, with different biology, and with different social roles and expectations. More importantly, I would never select a partner based on age and income brackets. What a horribly depersonalizing way to look at human connection.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/18 07:32 PM
0

37 now, made $80-90k in the military after uni, would have made more by staying in but I got really bored after coming home from deployments. Life didn’t seem worth its time when it consisted of condo mortgage payments, narrow conventional social groups and Netflix. So I eventually quit to travel internationally and now do cool shit instead. I plan to go back to school next year to begin a 2nd career and do something positive for the world. I don’t understand the point of dating when your youth …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/18 04:46 PM
1

OR you could go after a woman age 38-48 who makes $30-120k a year and deal with the fact that her youth is over and she may have slept with a few men in the past, but she will love you Pass. I’d rather die alone.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/18 04:12 PM
1

Rules require documentation and legal authority.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/18 03:52 PM
1

u/Jammerly1, you should go dig through r.rapekink if you want to see more “textbook” serial predators. They’re very different. Orgasms are also 100% decoupled from consent, this should be really be common knowledge. The dude in the thread you posted was a pushy low-empathy narcissist type, not a serial predator. The girl got walked on because she didn’t have strong boundaries. And IMO that’s something more women should be aware of. You can push “fear” as the limiting factor, but realistically th…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/18 07:39 PM
3

Also posted on that thread, lol. You guys are stupid as fuck. That subreddit is a dump.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/18 07:29 PM
1

young men in the SMP arent looking to settle down either I think you’d need to qualify/quantify an assumption like that. Same goes for young women, of course.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/18 01:51 AM
1

Well here was my logic. The more options somebody has, the less they’ll care about losing some of them. In dating, that would translate into low-effort behaviour. Thus hurting their partner, which is “I’m tired of being hurt” from the perspective of near-disposable female partners you’re talking about. u/lewiscross said “she was not good enough or hot enough or whatever enough to get commitment from an attractive man“. Which is essentially the same thing, right, in terms of emotional committment…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/18 01:28 AM
1

Ain’t that just “I’m tired of losing”, so you turn the level down on the competition from other women. Seems like semantics between you two unless I’m missing something.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/18 06:23 PM
1

I don’t think RP is inherently against moral standards. https://illimitablemen.com/2015/05/19/the-red-pill-you-morality/ Modern men who prioritise sex and utilitarianism above principles; men who prioritise incentive over the innate sense of justice that we all possess do not want to hear this though. They don’t want to observe another man’s moral code, one that holds that man to a higher standard of behaviour than he subjects himself to. Because for the ruthless Machiavellian, the most emphatic…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/18 11:39 AM
1

There’s a lot of silliness on RP. Content and peaceful is much a bigger question. I don’t think anyone has unlocked the key to happiness and fulfillment.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/18 01:12 AM
1

I'm gonna have to go ahead and disagree with you if you're saying that poisonous misogyny is somehow necessary to the process of understanding what women are attracted to Correcting an idealized version of anything will usually require a process of devaluation. Of course, some people don’t ever realize it’s a process and not an endstate. Maybe that makes things more clear.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/18 08:03 PM
1

Could you really like yourself for reading and following that stuff, though? Isn’t that a bit of a rhetorical question on your part?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/18 06:15 PM
2

If red pill weren't such a bunch of poisonous misogynists (note: not necessarily lumping you in with them) I think they might be surprised at the amount of human sympathy there is out there. I understand your sentiment, but sympathy is cheap. It doesn’t help. “You’ll find a nice girl one day” and all that reinforces bad thinking. It’s much better to be a poisonous misogynist if it gives you the clarity to understand that what makes women fuck is different from what makes them pass positive socia…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/18 12:48 AM
1

Interesting. A lot of the guy stuff that “scandalizes women” seems pretty similar, its just depersonalized and then systemized with its own jargon. I wonder why girls haven’t tried to do the same thing? There’s clearly a lot of bright women here who probably could, and that would help those girls disconnected from the Female Social Matrix.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/18 11:38 PM
1

Good answer, thanks for being so thorough. I didn’t know that girls were getting cultural messaging that’s just as bad as guys get. Was there any kind of ‘counter-advice’ for girls to deprogram themselves?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/18 11:16 PM
2

Wow. Is it an ego thing? Where does idea that even come from?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/18 10:50 PM
2

A “childless lone wolf” should not be looking to fit into polite society, you should be looking to pursue your passions and fuck them until they beg for mercy. A bored wife and kids who don’t respect you sound like hell on earth to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/18 10:47 PM
3

they think that they can turn his lust into love via wild sex. Good lord. Can any girl possibly be this stupid?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/18 10:34 PM
1

I saw Andrew Bachevich (an ex-Army Colonel) carefully stepping around gender pronouns after a trans friend of mine asked a question at a university lecture. None of these groups are social pariahs. Anybody who discriminates against them is going to be criticized just as much, if not more.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/18 10:23 PM
3

One of the biggest issues I see between women and men is lack of compromise, empathy, understanding, reciprocation, self awareness, generosity, selflessness, respect, commitment, love, and loyalty. This is the hardest part. You might as well attempt to change human nature.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/18 10:44 PM
2

We don’t have social pariahs anymore, because we don’t really have “society” in terms of close communities. Instead we are atomized individuals, where community has been replaced by media and administrative systems. Who would you even condemn someone to?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/18 10:41 PM
2

You could look at rates of marriage and starting families. Which of course, would tell you nothing about personal happiness.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/18 10:35 PM
8

I don’t mean this in a sexist way. But never, ever, ever simply take people at face value. People don’t say certain things because it’s culturally inappropriate or sensitive. It doesn’t fly. But it doesn’t mean that they can’t think the contrary — even subconsciously. We are not perfectly rational beings, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/18 10:31 PM
8

High status guys know that high status = social protection. This is the subset of guys who start bullying young with tacit consent from authority figures. Reddit hosted an AMA with an extremely contentious response from a serial rapist, it was scrubbed from the site but archived elsewhere. It’s worth reading. http://uproxx.com/viral/rapists-explain-why-they-rape-on-reddit/ The atomized and largely anonymous society we’ve built seems like the perfect playground for these guys. Sadly.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/18 04:00 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter