TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Intrepid-Channel-675 Archive

View 1 post and 44 comments by Intrepid-Channel-675 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

The fall off of sex is greater when men are removed from the equation.
/r/MensRights28/07/26 02:14 PM
3

The studies I read may have differentiated between clitoral orgasms and non-clitoral. It would be interesting to see studies of these types of orgasms, and the type of stimulation needed.
/r/MensRights27/07/26 07:01 PM
16

From what Ive read, 70- 75% of women can't orgasm from penis in vagina intercourse due to their personal anatomies- if the clitoris is too far from the vaginal opening, as it is for the majority of women, they won't be able to orgasm from this type of sex. This has been studied. It tends to be blamed on the man, but the woman's personal anatomy is the primary factor. Women often communicate poorly on the topic of sex and orgasms, and sometimes they don't know what they want to communicate. I don…
/r/MensRights27/07/26 04:49 PM
3

Check it out Lawsuit pushes to outlaw male circumcision in Colorado
/r/MensRights23/07/26 04:27 PM
3

I don't really know more than what is in the article, but it's cool that they are suing multiple states. It's happening in Oregon too, for those skipping the link.
/r/MensRights23/07/26 11:55 AM
8

The state of Colorado is being sued.
/r/MensRights23/07/26 11:46 AM
11

A group is doing this in my state. Lawsuit pushes to outlaw male circumcision in Colorado
/r/MensRights23/07/26 11:44 AM
11

what does this topic have to do with this sub?
/r/MensRights21/07/26 10:13 PM
1

Just a Guy
/r/MensRights19/07/26 06:44 PM
1

Ive heard one of the women who was interacting with Richard Ramirez talk about it, and she was open about the fact that she was sexually inclined toward rape fantasy. Richard Ramirez was attractive because he was believable (for obvious reasons) and because he was behind bars and couldn't hurt her.
/r/MensRights19/07/26 06:31 PM
14

What does this have to do with the men's rights sub?
/r/MensRights19/07/26 04:18 PM
22

Is there a legal barrier to getting a paternity test in this case?
/r/MensRights18/07/26 07:49 PM
1

The CDC study isn't about how often people report SA to police. I don't see the relevance of the quoted information to the CDC study.
/r/MensRights17/07/26 07:35 PM
4

Third wave "sex positive" feminism is populist within the demographic that feminism primarily draws adherents from- college age/20 something females. They are largely heterosexual/ bisexual women who want to demonize male sexuality, but they don't want their own sexuality to be judged in any way. They want to be free to do sex work, engage in BDSM, dress in a way that is seen as appealing to the "male gaze," they don't want their own sexual practices to be called into question by 2nd wave sex ne…
/r/MensRights17/07/26 07:05 PM
8

Most violence is male on male, so I don't know how they are statistically safer.
/r/MensRights28/05/26 09:48 PM
2

men going their own way/women going their own way
/r/MensRights28/05/26 09:42 PM
1

"Why do you think these numbers come from 2010 and 2011." I mean, the article was from 2014, so that isn't really some sort of smoking gun.
/r/MensRights25/05/26 12:36 AM
0

Man, you edited the crap out of this comment long after I responded. That is definitely not the comment I responded to. It's kind of misleading.
/r/MensRights23/05/26 07:44 AM
1

Radical feminism has a specific meaning. Radical is "root" in this context, it is based in Latin. Radical feminists have specific positions they forwarded, like anti-porn and anti sex work feminism. There are third wave feminists who oppose their views. Some of these third wave so called sex positive feminists have "extreme" positions, some hate men, but they are not radical feminists. They hold different views. You simply don't know what you are talking about.
/r/MensRights23/05/26 03:32 AM
1

Also, mirriam webster isnt talking about the context of radical feminism there.
/r/MensRights23/05/26 03:17 AM
1

Right, and you think it just means that definition, that was pretty much my point. yawn
/r/MensRights23/05/26 03:15 AM
1

No, im not talking about a dictionary definition. I think you probably think the radical part means "extreme" or something, and don't really know anything about the specific branch of feminism, which doesn't really have much of anything to do with the story you posted. Im not a fan of radfems, but you don't know what you are talking about.
/r/MensRights23/05/26 02:59 AM
1

No. I doubt you know what radical feminism is. I'm not a fan of radical feminism, but in the past people in mrm circles knew what it is/was sometimes when they were criticizing it.
/r/MensRights23/05/26 02:39 AM
1

Im not sure at what point the manipulation that you are talking about is supposed to have occurred. In the Cathy Young article she reports figures being about even. "And now the real surprise: when asked about experiences in the last 12 months, men reported being “made to penetrate”—either by physical force or due to intoxication—at virtually the same rates as women reported rape (both 1.1 percent in 2010, and 1.7 and 1.6 respectively in 2011)."
/r/MensRights23/05/26 12:08 AM
2

The only time article about this that I read was a Cathy Young article, and she was critical of the methodology of the study. It was this one, I think. Im not sure I completely understand your criticism (in the third paragraph) if you are talking about that article. The CDC's Rape Numbers Are Misleading
/r/MensRights22/05/26 11:44 PM
6

Yeah, sperm banks. Artificial womb research seems more geared towards premature birth.
/r/MensRights22/05/26 11:17 PM
4

So don't leave the artificial womb in a warehouse.
/r/MensRights22/05/26 05:24 PM
2

I was going to ask a similar question. Particularly, what does it have to do with radical feminism?
/r/MensRights22/05/26 03:24 PM
3

Why would they attach it to their bodies?
/r/MensRights22/05/26 02:21 PM
2

With men's issues the position a woman holds sometimes changes if the issue is being faced by a male who she is closely connected to, like a partner or family member. It seems more important to have the ability to see the issues when there isn't an intimate connection involved.
/r/MensRights17/05/26 06:21 PM
1

Looking it up, it sounds cheaper than I would have thought. It doesn't really seem like a bad idea for some people. One problem I sort of see with it is that a lot of young men don't really want kids, not enough to store sperm, but also don't want to get vasectomies on the off chance that they might change their minds in the future. One figure I saw for the first-year process and storage was $700, and that would be a bit much for some folks.
/r/MensRights10/05/26 07:57 PM
1

Im not seeing the seizing of sperm through eminent domain as something I would worry much about, but paying a private company to store your sperm seems expensive, probably outside of what a lot of young men could afford. I don't know if vasalgel type technology will come to the point of being cleared for use in our lifetime, or ever, but that would probably be much more economically viable.
/r/MensRights10/05/26 07:17 PM
1

They will only do it in the morning at my healthcare provider. You have like a couple hour window, I think. That is when it is supposed to be done, and I think that is when it is highest.
/r/MensRights09/02/26 02:37 AM
2

Thank you for your contribution.
/r/MensRights09/02/26 12:56 AM
2

When you say, "what is the worst that could happen?" it sounds like you didn't/don't know that there are serious health issues associated with high testosterone. That would be a part of the general discussion I am talking about.
/r/MensRights09/02/26 12:14 AM
1

You asked what the worst that could happen is, I would say maybe a heart attack or a stroke, death, that sort of thing.
/r/MensRights08/02/26 11:59 PM
1

I would just add for clarity that celiac disease isn't associated with high testosterone, it was unexpected. I think they wanted to make sure my fatigue wasn't due to low testosterone.
/r/MensRights08/02/26 11:18 PM
2

Im not an expert, but the health concerns associated with high testosterone that I've read about are heart attacks and other cardiovascular problems, prostate cancer, and low sperm count. I think there are some other ones, but those seem to be some of the main ones.
/r/MensRights08/02/26 10:50 PM
2

Thank you for this reply. Yeah, I went through my normal health provider too, getting labs after my celiac diagnosis. I had fatigue and that sort of thing, the guy ordering the labs wanted to make sure it wasn't a hormonal problem even though there were other possible reasons related to celiac. I was 51 when I was tested for it, they are probably more likely to test for it with older men. The procedure that you are describing is what I would expect at a regular healthcare facility, but I'm getti…
/r/MensRights08/02/26 10:38 PM
1

Yeah.
/r/MensRights08/02/26 09:56 PM
2

I don't know if my edit to my original post would help. I'm not looking for testosterone therapy. That isn't the point of my post. I got my testosterone checked with other bloodwork after being diagnosed with a disease at my regular healthcare provider. The standard given by my doctor is what I'm going with, and they said it was too high.
/r/MensRights08/02/26 08:53 PM
1

I don't know if the comment I wrote seems like im looking for testosterone therapy, I got my testosterone checked along with other bloodwork at my regular healthcare provider after a diagnosis of celiac disease. I sort of edited it for brevity. My testosterone is too high, I don't want more of it. I was just wondering if there is discussion of the seemingly sketchy nature of this industry. I tend to look at the men's rights movement as a bit separate from the chunk of the "manosphere" I think of…
/r/MensRights08/02/26 07:51 PM
0

I just don't know how common this is in the industry. The other issue is that different providers and agencies have different standards for what healthy testosterone levels are. With testosterone clinics that make money solely by prescribing testosterone, their financial incentives are going to be to have loose standards, or no testing at all required.
/r/MensRights08/02/26 07:35 PM
3

If I remember correctly, the boy scouts became unisex because it was found legally liable for a massive sex abuse scandal somewhat similar to the Catholic Church scandal. It owed tons of money from the lawsuit and was facing decreased interest from boys. At least that was how it was reported in the thing I read.
/r/MensRights05/02/26 11:10 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter