TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

InvaderDem Archive

View 1 posts and 284 comments by InvaderDem on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

What does feminism have to do with this? I highly doubt actual feminists would come to her defense.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/02/21 02:16 PM
1

Watching that guy breathe a sigh of relief a few seconds in lets you know he's been on the receiving end of being berated for awhile. He hasn't had many people stand up for him.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/01/21 03:40 AM
1216

The irony is that we're told that all we think about is sex and imagining women naked but then get attacked when we do something that proves that idea wrong.
/r/PussyPassDenied31/07/20 07:14 PM
1

Oh. ... ... ... ... Are we not supposed to be disgusted by rape, then?
/r/PussyPassDenied22/08/19 02:07 PM
2

I'd prefer topics that aren't just a photo with some key words, especially when the photo is a very relevant photo from a natural disaster that's taking place as we speak. I'd like to see threads where this photo is referenced followed by a starting argument/dialogue, because it's harder to take those types of threads and use them to show how "shitty MRAs are." Do you want to argue that the masculinity that we're seeing in the photo is always under attack in normal situations, but is okay during…
/r/MensRights28/08/17 06:02 PM
1

Fair enough, though I'd say that this hinges on being a low-effort post. Perhaps if OP provided a better title and some discussion with the initial post, there wouldn't be so many comments saying this isn't a good post. I've seen this subreddit be aligned with other negative subreddits, which I don't necessarily agree with, so I just don't think these types of post - with no clear context or discussion - are beneficial in being distanced from those subreddits.
/r/MensRights28/08/17 05:37 PM
3

Yeah, these comments are depressing. This sub has been compared to other despicable subs - the worst being that one subreddit who blindly follow our current President - and these are the type of posts that don't help. God help us if it hits /r/all. The fact that it's a top post on the sub right now is embarrassing.
/r/MensRights28/08/17 04:21 PM
12

Great, more ammo for people to use to showcase that /r/MensRights is a joke. Is there another subreddit that actually focuses on unfair treatment of men instead of shitposts like these?
/r/MensRights28/08/17 03:36 PM
4

What was the opinion? Because this is the type of shit that makes both MRAs look bad and this subreddit a joke to the rest of Reddit. Edit: I'm actually really curious, because I agree with your original theory on why you removed it: basically this is a clickbait shitpost.
/r/MensRights28/08/17 03:26 PM
2

Are there any firms around you that specialize in focusing on men going through divorce? In my area, we have a firm called ADAM (American Divorce Association for Men) who focuses on this area. Unfortunately, it seems just tied to my area. Otherwise, the only other pieces of advice I can give are these: Focus less on getting an aggressive lawyer, and more on a logical and tactical one. They're the ones who will be more realistic in the situation and be able to plan out better. An aggressive lawye…
/r/MensRights11/08/17 03:20 PM
13

"The evidence actually established that Conrad Roy caused his own death by his physical actions and by his own thoughts," defense attorney Joseph Cataldo said. "You're dealing with an individual who wanted to take his own life. ... He dragged Michelle Carter into this." What. Bullshit. Edit: Here's another exerpt from a similar article: Carter’s lawyer, Joseph Cataldo, argued that Roy was determined to kill himself and nothing Carter did could change that. He said Carter initially tried to talk …
/r/MensRights03/08/17 04:44 PM
31

In every - every - article I hear about that involves a woman killing a man for her gain, there's some contradictory statement in the article. If I were a reporter on these kinds of topics, I'd pull my hair out because I'd be reporting two different things.
/r/MensRights25/07/17 06:29 PM
31

Isn't this the woman who said she wished she had an abortion just so she could say she experienced it? Not sure if she should comment about families considering she wants to take the steps to have one only to abort it. Yeah yeah, she apologized. but the fact she said it in the first place speaks volumes.
/r/MensRights19/06/17 05:30 PM
2

It has nothing to do with Mens Rights, and this mentality makes it seem like we need to find a way to take credit. Wonder Woman actually did us a favor by eliminating the idea that men were the reason that Ghostbusters 2016 flopped. Wonder Woman shows that if a movie is well-written and is strongly done, we don't care what gender is in the lead role. Mens Rights needs to focus on fair divorce settlements, equal parenting time, fighting genital mutilation, the right for a father to get primary ri…
/r/MensRights14/06/17 03:09 PM
0

If this is a legitimate MRA argument, maybe I should stop being an MRA. If we're going to argue, "Technically, men are the reason Wonder Women did so well because we read the comics back in the day when it was uncool," maybe it's time for me to move on.
/r/MensRights14/06/17 02:34 PM
55

Children and teenagers, before they're even adults, have had to deal first-hand with a catastrophe that we may never have to deal with, if we're lucky. I saw a video of someone who was recording when the explosion happened and it was scary to see people begin to panic and run all over the place amid the screams of teenagers and confusion. But yes, let's make this about how men hate women. Let's not kid ourselves, whomever did this ... probably did this because they were children and wanted us to…
/r/MensRights23/05/17 06:02 PM
24

I feel like this is missing something, or I am missing something. The title says, "Why women don't make less than men," but the information provided actually shows that there is a wage gap, it's just not as much as perceived. And then it teases us by saying, "What's really going on" and ... that's the end of it? We're not going to drill down on statistics to prove anything? No footnotes to source? This just seems like a very basic graphic to get a point across. There's no information or sources …
/r/MensRights09/05/17 08:13 PM
17

“I put my hand up in order to stop him and touched his body,” she added. “Then I saw a piece of intestine in my hand. So she put her hand up in order to stop him and touched his body, and her hand happened to slip through the flesh, through the muscle, through any stored fat and somehow the intestine got wrapped around her hand, and when she pulled her hand back, it just so happened to come out with her, huh? Oh wait, it was only a piece? They then started to have sex again but she suddenly stab…
/r/MensRights17/02/17 02:38 PM
5

Judging on the context of the obituary, I doubt it. Sounds like they held grudges.
/r/MensRights13/02/17 08:48 PM
2

How is this a /r/mensrights issue? This seems like something more geared towards /r/revenge, or something along those lines. Also, for someone they hated, if they published the whole obituary in the paper, that cost them a pretty penny.
/r/MensRights13/02/17 08:46 PM
67

Making the ruling, Sir Ernest said: “She had unwisely invested in a series of properties, each time moving upmarket, with the consequence that she is now without any of the capital she was given in 2002.” However, he said Judge Everall “made an error of principle” in not explaining why Mrs Mills should not have her monthly payments raised and that Mr Mills “has and had the ability to make the maintenance payments asked for”. That's because common sense applies here and if you can't even make a d…
/r/MensRights06/02/17 08:11 PM
13

I think it's unfair to say that every woman who marched should have known who she is. That will be impossible. However, the people who signed her up either were aware of what she did, or weren't. Unfortunately, no matter how you look at it it, that reflects negative. Also, I hope that this sub isn't going to brush off any feminist that's here, unless they're not willing to listen or are just trolling the sub ... And that logic applies to everyone, not just feminists. If we can have good conversa…
/r/MensRights27/01/17 12:48 PM
4

There are some that actually have the mindset that the penetration is rape. Since women - in normal circumstances - aren't able to penetrate, they can't be at fault. The person who is doing the penetration is the problem; the other party is the victim.
/r/MensRights12/01/17 02:56 PM
11

Most of the women. Leah Remini looks pretty unimpressed and appears to be going along with it because she has to. There's even one point where she appears to see herself on TV and smiles. She also essentially says the only time this is excusable is rape.
/r/MensRights31/12/16 04:33 PM
2

So let me get this straight - we see a family experience two deaths within two days shortly after Christmas - someone lost their mother and grandmother right around Christmas. And the focus is on how a tribute tweet is offensive.
/r/MensRights29/12/16 03:43 PM
2

You focus on ridiculous issues - "why can't I hit on random women in the street" Stopped reading there. Been on this sub for a few years now and have never seen this post.
/r/MensRights23/12/16 08:10 PM
116

DiCaprio shows off middle-age spread He's 42. That's middle-aged. He is looks exactly how he should look. Edit: Removed a paragraph; wasn't really relevant because it was comparing the two images when the publication wasn't comparing the two. Still, it should be noted that both look their age and appear in good shape. But DiCaprio isn't overweight or over-eating and Schumer's body isn't a trainwreck; but it's also not a knockout body. Edit 2: People, give me actual reasons why both of these peop…
/r/MensRights20/12/16 04:41 PM
2

crying out for Mummy. What the hell.
/r/MensRights03/12/16 03:44 PM
33

What the hell? "Have you been hurt? Is this a revenge trip?" Isn't it possible that some people see marriage for what it can cause from a legal standpoint and not be approving of it? Or that they see that when a pregnancy is established, the man may not have much say? I think the guy gave good, and truthful responses. When a divorce occurs, there is a potential for a division of assets. And what's worse is that the man may not have a choice in the decision. If a woman wants to get a divorce, in …
/r/MensRights01/12/16 05:35 PM
1

They are, which is why I didn't even mention the topic of statutory rape. But you should know lying is wrong at 13, but she still did it.
/r/MensRights24/11/16 04:13 AM
327

his accuser admitted to the judge the sex between the pair was consensual and she had said it was rape so her boyfriend would not be angry that she’d had sex with someone else. Ah, so let's destroy the boy's life instead of owning up to your mistakes. Yeah, this is why false accusations merit being arrested. At the very least, she should be charged with lying to the police.
/r/MensRights23/11/16 08:59 PM
14

I don't think the site states whether the women who took the poll were employed or not. It doesn't justify cheating, but it's a fair argument that if both parties are working, both should be doing housework at home as well.
/r/MensRights23/11/16 06:50 PM
12

Hillary needs to take some of the blame too. I was thinking that if the DNC/Clintons hadn't worked together to push Sanders out, I bet a lot of people would have still voted democrat. However, because of their shady business, many would-be voters went Republican or Third Party. And what does she have to show for it? A loss to Donald fucking Trump. Even if Bernie won the primary, she could say that she lost to Sanders. But no, she lost to Trump, and that's her legacy now. I would hate to be aroun…
/r/MensRights10/11/16 07:44 PM
10

You and me both. I have no issues with a female president, but she wasn't a good choice. You don't want the first female president to be surrounded by scandal and corruption. That would set a terrible precedent for future women presidents.
/r/MensRights10/11/16 07:42 PM
15

Stop mansplaining why you caused Trump to win! #triggered
/r/MensRights10/11/16 05:16 PM
44

She said EXPLAIN, not MANSPLAIN. We all know mansplaining is when a man gives an answer. She wanted a woman to answer, and this fucking guy just forced himself in and gave the answer. Check your privilege. You're the reason Trump won.
/r/MensRights10/11/16 05:08 PM
7

There are definitely a lot of people mad at the DNC. It's possible Clinton would still would have won if they hadn't rigged the results; but the fact that they were caught probably sent a lot of would-be voters to other parties. That, and her reputation, was her downfall in my opinion. However, it's easier to say that it wasn't the candidate, but the voters ... whose obligations shouldn't be to vote for a particular candidate, but a candidate they believe in. Now, if you'll excuse me, I need to …
/r/MensRights09/11/16 07:56 PM
11

Trump won because he got enough votes to net the higher number of electoral votes. Clinton may have the popular vote, but unfortunately that doesn't win an election for some ridiculous reason. (According to that website, she does have more votes ... but before we cry that it was sexism, this has apparently happened multiple times in the past) While there is no doubt sexism probably lost her some votes, it's not the main reason. Her being a woman is not why she lost the election. But I've learned…
/r/MensRights09/11/16 07:34 PM
5

Insurance Companies: We will not support birth control as part of your employer insurance. All we can say is that if you do not want a child and can't support the child, keep it in your pants! Companies: We will not select an insurance plan that covers birth control. All we can say is that if you do not want a child and can't support yourselves, keep it in your pants! Men: All I can say is that if you do not want a child and can't help support the child and myself as a family, keep it in your pa…
/r/MensRights31/10/16 07:46 PM
13

Wait, you want me to act like rape isn't disgusting at all? That's fucked up.
/r/MensRights19/10/16 07:04 PM
5

An autopsy showed she then stabbed him 40 times. When I read things like this, I see this is as a true disrespect to the family. The life was probably gone after the first couple stabs; was it necessary to do it an additional 35 times? I'm glad the family forgave her. If this happened to someone in my family, I couldn't do it. I wouldn't want them to have that peace of mind that I have forgiven them. I'd want them to live with the thought that I will never be at peace with what they did. Then ag…
/r/MensRights14/10/16 04:43 PM
7

I'd hope most people realize that with any faction like this, the loudest and most annoying will be heard. The ones that talk, understand and respect will not force themselves in front of a camera and belittle other people; nor will the media jump to them in order to get people to watch.
/r/MensRights13/10/16 03:16 PM
5

It's his "privilege" to be recording her ... but the first thing she does is whip out her phone and (I'm assuming) record?
/r/MensRights13/10/16 03:09 PM
5

This is a broad statement saying women will ruin the country by voting for Hilary. (No, really!) This assumes that Trump won't ruin the country. And what about the men who vote for Clinton? What about the women who vote for Trump? If this country is going down in flames, it's because we all let it get to this point and both men and women voted for whomever destroys it. To pin this on a particular gender is stupid, close-minded and is the exact thing we'd call bullshit on if a woman said men will…
/r/MensRights12/10/16 10:01 PM
13

Keep the political shit with the political subreddits. These posts are what anti-MRAs use as an example to try and prove their point.
/r/MensRights12/10/16 06:21 PM
184

No. 1 - Glad she has a degree to make the diagnosis. No. 4 - Seems ironic. No. 8 - Well, "If fewer women engaged in verbal harassment online, we might consider one woman doing it unusual."
/r/MensRights12/10/16 01:39 PM
1

You don't need to subscribe. I got banned from replying to a comment.
/r/MensRights07/10/16 10:18 PM
2

Wait. They arrested him when you called on her?
/r/MensRights04/10/16 01:41 PM
25

A few things: The whole point of freedom of speech is to be allowed to express your personal beliefs without judgement or punishment from the government. It does not legally protect you from being an asshole or a bitch. She has every right to not like Donald Trump. He has every right to have a Hillary for Prison sign. But, people who think they can be rude and mean to other people and stand behind the first amendment can be at fault because they could be causing disorderly conduct - which is a m…
/r/MensRights22/09/16 08:55 PM
1

What's the issue here?
/r/MensRights16/09/16 07:06 PM
2

I will never ever be able to comprehend how a human being can willingly put their child through this.
/r/MensRights15/09/16 04:19 PM
1

Yes.
/r/MensRights11/09/16 09:43 AM
4

Yeah, perhaps it's actively being edited in and out. I checked a few hours ago and it wasn't there.
/r/MensRights07/09/16 08:15 PM
5

It's already gone. Edit: Apparently it's back. I checked a few hours ago and it wasn't there.
/r/MensRights07/09/16 07:49 PM
2

When did you take this snapshot? Because that little tidbit is already gone.
/r/MensRights07/09/16 05:09 PM
1

It's because it's a murder charge. Local news does this too. If a minor is being charged as an adult for murder, they post the photos. Isn't related to the sexual abuse issue. Not saying it's an excuse, just why they probably did it.
/r/MensRights03/09/16 12:59 PM
2

Assuming you're saying the math doesn't look right on the Feminism = Equality formula, here's your answer: ≠
/r/MensRights02/09/16 05:34 PM
2

Exactly how many children grow up believing the wrong man is their biological father is difficult to determine, but a 2005 review of studies found the rate was about 4 per cent, or roughly 1 in 25 children What a scary statistic.
/r/MensRights02/09/16 05:32 PM
3

What are you talking about? If the statistics /u/Kyle_Fischer is providing are accurate, and if the data shows that a large percentage of the book purchases are from women, then it's a good argument to show that women are interested in that type of content. Perhaps OC can provide a source that shows the demographics of people who purchased the book. This way, you can look at it and verify what he's using to develop his theory.
/r/MensRights02/09/16 05:02 PM
15

Care to elaborate? Or did you just want to call me ignorant?
/r/MensRights30/08/16 06:33 PM
30

After the ruling, Chapman said she and her client were "disappointed" with the "very significant" sentence. 14 months for sexual abuse over the course of two years isn't a very significant sentence. Edit: A word.
/r/MensRights30/08/16 05:15 PM
1

Yes. I'd imagine that was a factor in it being removed.
/r/MensRights25/08/16 06:40 PM
1

I didn't say the statement is irrational. I said this is the type of content that anti-MRAs could take from this sub and use as an example of how "irrational" we are. They'll skip over all the other articles calling out unfair treatment of men and focus on the one that has us "complaining" about womens' physical appearance and how it's manipulative and trickery. This is not an MRA issue. To quote /u/FFXIV_Machinist, this a shitpost. Makeup hides wrinkles, acne, and "imperfections," and red blush…
/r/MensRights25/08/16 03:33 PM
5

Sorry, this post is reaching. This is the type of stuff people will pull to use as an example of how irrational MRA's are.
/r/MensRights25/08/16 02:51 PM
4

How is the usage of makeup tricking and manipulating us?
/r/MensRights25/08/16 02:34 PM
1

Kitts had told the boy to keep the relationship secret and said if he told anyone her life would be ruined and she could go to jail, according to an agreed statement of facts. she could go to jail Yeah, right ... "could" was used properly here, because she won't. And if she does, less than a year.
/r/MensRights23/08/16 06:22 PM
3

Michigan has a 100 mile rule for existing custodial environments This rule wouldn't apply unfortunately. The mileage between the cities is roughly 55 miles and I don't see any state preventing a parent from moving roughly an hour away. However this ... She dumped her current husband of two years and plans to move in with some new guy that she just met. She hasn't worked in years (leans on men) isn't moving for a job and claims that she "has no choice because she is being evicted from her place h…
/r/MensRights22/08/16 03:37 PM
21

You mean this? OK also can we enough with the messages blasting Amy when I specifically told her to do exactly what she did? You see what I'm talking about? You don't have the whole story and you go "SNAP!" I have decided! At the very least maybe my first name will stop being "Amy Schumer Writer." Like I'm under jurisdiction. I'm not. I do not punk out for the brass ring. But I gotta square what I say with myself. I assure you my self righteousness is intact but now without the nagging guilt. I …
/r/MensRights18/08/16 03:48 PM
7

Is it just me or is more news popping up that points out the hypocrisy and unfairness that men often face?
/r/MensRights10/08/16 10:45 PM
9

I applaud his Uncle for keeping such a peaceful demeanor. If I faced someone who caused the death of my nephew, I honestly don't know how I'd feel ... but I'm pretty sure I wouldn't give that person the benefit of the doubt.
/r/MensRights02/08/16 02:16 PM
2

Wasn't Leah Remini also of the same mindset? I recall seeing her clearly unimpressed while Gilbert wasn't amused and the rest of them cackled.
/r/MensRights26/07/16 10:11 PM
4

Heard throws allegations at Depp and the media blows it out of proportion and points the finger at him. Heard has already moved on to another man despite all the emotional abuse (I'd need some time if I was in an emotional abusive relationship) and nobody's calling her out. What a world we live in.
/r/MensRights26/07/16 03:40 AM
5

Look up NASA's latest report about warming. Okay. The scientific consensus according to NASA's Climate Change page says: Ninety-seven percent of climate scientists agree that climate-warming trends over the past century are very likely due to human activities, and most of the leading scientific organizations worldwide have issued public statements endorsing this position. Can you source where you're finding that NASA is saying it's a hoax?
/r/MensRights20/07/16 07:52 PM
7

That's the thing - I don't support either of them. We have such a terrible choice for the next four years. It's awful.
/r/MensRights20/07/16 07:43 PM
8

A couple of months ago, he posted a tweet mocking someone at the gym trying to better themselves. I'm going to assume he's done similar tweets to other people. So yeah, if you do shit like this and then have your account suspended, you won't get my support.
/r/MensRights20/07/16 07:18 PM
9

On one hand, there's a man who has gone on record saying that we should kill the families of terrorists and that global warming is a hoax caused by China. He also boasts a wealth that comes from an inheritance, and has four bankruptcies in his history. On the other hand, there's a woman who has gotten away with a crime that would have financially crushed me and thrown me in jail for the rest of my life and has a twitter bio where she says she's a woman's and children's advocate instead of an adv…
/r/MensRights20/07/16 07:12 PM
6

Thank you! I recall he did something that everyone didn't care for and this was it. I don't know who the guy really is, but all I've heard from him was condescending, so I'm not inclined to get my pitchfork out. Also, fuck people who take pictures of, and mock fat people who try to better themselves by going to the gym.
/r/MensRights20/07/16 10:49 AM
16

I didn't even catch this was a male author. That's ironic.
/r/MensRights13/07/16 12:51 PM
15

I read the title and promptly hit the back button. Any article that is simply titled "Fucking white boys" doesn't deserve my attention.
/r/MensRights01/07/16 01:15 PM
1

Even in a state where shared custody is the law, some judges refuse to enforce the law as written wat?
/r/MensRights30/06/16 02:46 PM
3

My child takes Adderall for pretty much the exact reason you specified. Focusing at school is/was a huge issue when he started first grade. In addition to adaptation issues, he simply wouldn't focus and kept getting sidetracked. He is now on a very low time-released dosage and things got a lot better after a few months. I personally didn't want him on the medicine but finally gave in after dealing with the teacher's reports. And to his pediatricians credit, he originally didn't want to give him …
/r/MensRights28/06/16 05:59 PM
3

Actually, because of her mentality ... I, apparently, wouldn't know what that is like because I'm a man; so I shouldn't be allowed to have anything to say. She won't know what it's like to be a young boy, so she shouldn't be allowed to have anything to say. My motto: You can't nitpick your opinions. If it's going to be outrageous, it's going to be outrageous in all areas of life.
/r/MensRights27/06/16 06:28 PM
3

No, she's wrong. If she's going to argue that zero experience means zero input, then there are probably a lot of things she talks about where she has no right to provide input out of no experience. Surely, she doesn't give her opinion on anything except what she's personally been involved in, right? Also ... We need to educate men that women are not objects and that consent should be given before any romantic/sexual advances are made I would drop this mentality. Men do not need to be educated th…
/r/MensRights27/06/16 06:22 PM
1

You don't see a one-sided representation of masculinity in the news? I do, but I just don't think we're seeing it here.
/r/MensRights21/06/16 06:17 PM
0

The Orlando killing is both recent and a big media clusterfuck because of the politics being injected into it. I have not heard it being referenced as toxic masculinity as much as I've heard it being referenced as islamic terrorism and a LBGT issue. This particular shooting won't be in the news because it happened in late 2015. This is merely saying he'll be receiving an award for what he did.
/r/MensRights21/06/16 04:27 PM
9

I don't understand. What's the issue here?
/r/MensRights21/06/16 03:26 PM
3

What goes on in the marriage of anyone outside our families and friendships is none of our business. Says the person who is basing her story on the marriage of someone outside of her family and friendship.
/r/MensRights10/06/16 07:49 PM
1

The double standard is that the public outcry we're hearing about Brock isn't happening to similar and more severe cases. I know who he is because the media has shoved it in my face. I don't remember hearing about any of the other cases.
/r/MensRights10/06/16 06:57 PM
13

If she reads this article, she might. Dale Vince was right, this can open up a Pandora's Box of problems for people who have long been divorced.
/r/MensRights10/06/16 02:39 PM
89

Approving the terms of the settlement, High Court family judge Mr Justice Cobb, sitting in London, said: 'I am perfectly satisfied that it is reasonable, and that the wife is entitled to receive a modest capital reward following the breakdown of this marriage. But ... she wasn't his wife when he earned the wealth. This judge needs a psychological evaluation. 'The lump sum payment agreed between the parties fairly represents, in my view, a realistic and balanced appraisal of the unusual circumsta…
/r/MensRights10/06/16 01:27 PM
36

She clearly laid the foundation for his success. It only makes sense that she benefit for it. /s Edit: On the brightside, if my ex-wife ever becomes rich, I can get compensation! Right? Right?
/r/MensRights10/06/16 01:20 PM
2

So far, it appears that she's been quiet. Can't blame her though, I'd hate to be lumped into this fiasco. But you're right; it's interesting that she's been quiet when Depp's ex has stated that DV does not sound like something he would do.
/r/MensRights08/06/16 01:40 PM
1

Yeah, he has to live with that mistake. He's old enough, he should have known better, unless he legitimately doesn't care.
/r/MensRights08/06/16 01:35 PM
2

No intention of hitting a nerve, I just wanted to point out some hypocrisies: I think the media was pretty lenient on reporting this. Even now, a search for Amber Heard has older articles intermingled with the DV reports. If it was revealed that Depp had the history of DV, the media would have gone insane and it'd be headlines everywhere. That being said, I wish I only posted this with the first sentence as the headline. Second, had this been a guy who had a history of DV, this probably would ha…
/r/MensRights08/06/16 01:34 PM
4

In retrospect, I should have left out the second sentence altogether since it is getting some traction.
/r/MensRights07/06/16 04:18 PM
4

TMZ link
/r/MensRights07/06/16 02:12 PM
10

Don't White Knight for a lying whore. Did you read my response? I'm not supporting Heard whatsoever. But in this particular video, he didn't call her a whore. If you're going to say Joe Rogan talks about how she's lying like a whore, post the video where he actually does that.
/r/MensRights06/06/16 01:30 PM
15

Amber Heard is apparently suing Stanhope for defamation. It doesn't help her case, in my opinion, that after she throws out all these accusations, she attacks someone who has gone on-record as saying it's not true. To me, it's coming off that she's doing whatever she can to get as much money as possible out of this whole mess. I hope this means Depp can sue her if any of her claims end up being false. Edit: It should also be clarified that Rogan didn't call Amber a whore or anything like that. H…
/r/MensRights06/06/16 01:15 PM
1

I feel the same for people who justify poor grammar and stupid abbreviation of words because of a character limit. It's not like you're in a writing profession or anything ...
/r/MensRights02/06/16 02:02 PM
6

Files for divorce. Claims domestic violence with photos. Claims domestic violence with additional photos. The reason why I don't believe Heard's accusations isn't because I'm pro-Depp, as this article would suggest. It's also not because I refuse to believe Depp could be an abuser (I was wrong about Jared Fogle, so clearly my thoughts don't mean they're concrete fact). The reason why I don't believe her is because all three of those items should have been lumped into the first point. She should …
/r/MensRights01/06/16 05:42 PM
20

You say "innocent until proven guilty" but then say we shouldn't defend Depp (I.e., believe him to be guilty). Until more details come out, I have no evidence on who is telling the truth. In this situation, I'm more inclined not to believe Heard heard based on the timeline of the accusation. Which was ironically a day or so after spousal support was denied.
/r/MensRights31/05/16 09:58 AM
186

It's not coincidental that he was accused of domestic violence after her support was rejected. You either say this to get the truth out or get what you want. And if you're doing it to get the news out there, you bring out this accusation from the beginning. But instead, it was originally "divorce requesting spousal support." The timing on this isn't coincidental. Edit: I'll also point out she did this at one of the worst times to do it, after the death of a parent. Now, if Depp has legitimately …
/r/MensRights30/05/16 10:52 AM
3

Too bad men lack empathy. If only we had that, we could get an emotional idea of what that's like.
/r/MensRights28/05/16 05:10 PM
2

Can you provide a source on this claim? I'd also be curious on how much of that 75% is paid by people in high tax brackets, etc.
/r/MensRights26/05/16 04:35 PM
2

What? Are we talking about a different type of tax? Anyone that works is contributing towards welfare tax.
/r/MensRights26/05/16 03:36 PM
63

Honest question - what's to stop this guy from going to the major websites that named him prior to being guilty and suing them for defamation of character; or what's to stop him from suing the accuser for defamation of character? If they can keep the accuser anonymous (who, in reality, should be outed because she is the threat), they could have kept him anonymous until a guilty verdict was reached.
/r/MensRights24/05/16 03:11 PM
10

It does all my work without me even asking!
/r/MensRights14/05/16 06:58 PM
10

While you're computer's crashing, mine's multitasking.
/r/MensRights14/05/16 06:58 PM
4

MRAs value traditional gender roles Stopped reading there. Unless ... am I wrong here? I thought we wanted equality between genders? Honestly, though, I wonder how Hillary is still being considered the democratic candidate when she clearly has a lot stacked up against her - her email scandal, her flip-flop views and being in the pocket of big companies, etc.
/r/MensRights11/05/16 03:45 PM
0

He got more than gift certificates. Honestly, if we did the ol' genderswap, this sub would argue that this is fair. He already has an established career and is getting $165,000 from the divorce ... this is more than enough to get back on your feet.
/r/MensRights10/05/16 03:16 PM
1

Gonna' play Devil's Advocate here and say there are other means to get someone away from a family ordeal that doesn't involve permanent facial scarring and blindness.
/r/MensRights09/05/16 07:31 PM
3

Sometimes when I think about people being punished... I... I like to pinch my nipples real real hard, and I think about how much these people deserve to be hurt. Oh God, they deserve to be hurt so bad. Jesus, I just wish I could hurt them myself. They deserve it so much. It's the only way. It's the way God intended. Hurting people is the only way. You're an interesting lawyer.
/r/MensRights06/05/16 05:12 PM
1

Overall, I agree with you. Using the legal system as a way to force someone into paying support isn't a great way to deal with it. The problem is that he appears to be fighting tooth-and-nail to pay and is opting for less time with the kids. That's the problem. In another reply, I say it comes down to why she is pursuing it. I think she is entitled to additional help if he is choosing to spend less time with his kids. This is as long as it's not stemming from her decision to go part-time.
/r/MensRights03/05/16 08:32 PM
2

Regardless of whether you think this or not, your fiance's going to be in a position where he will be providing for your children if you get married. In my state, this isn't the case. When my ex got remarried, my support payments didn't adjust based on his income. He may pick up responsibility by being the stepdad, he may not be legally responsible.
/r/MensRights03/05/16 08:24 PM
14

I'll give you my background before I give my opinion. And before that, I'll say that I'm no lawyer, so take this with a grain of salt ... they'll know the best course of action in your state/location. I've been divorced for about 6 years. I hate the concept of child support. My ex decided to quit the marriage and her decision forced me to pay child support without me having a say in it. The courts looked at my income and decided how much would be taken out of my check. I literally never even had…
/r/MensRights03/05/16 08:18 PM
3

May I ask why she is the abuser if he is depositing checks into a bank account? In my opinion, if he's trying whatever he can do to not pay money towards his children, that is when the courts need to come in. It's evident based on her story that he is being pretty damn negligent and negative about. And I don't see her fiancee's income as a factor. This is a child between her and the husband and they both need to be financially responsible for the child ... it should not be a requirement that the…
/r/MensRights03/05/16 08:06 PM
1

Is this a finished procedure where Mom got custody? Or is this still in the works? It would seem to me that a quick background check would bring this incident up, with the photos proving he was attacked and the emergency custody request gets denied. This would also be good leverage to remove the child from Mom's home, as she obviously has a temper that comes up for minor incidents.
/r/MensRights01/05/16 10:45 AM
9

She killed her daughters to protect them from the father. Irony~~~ ... Let's also humor her for a millisecond. If you really believed that the best course of action is to kill your kids, why the fuck would you slit their throats with a broken glass bottle? Wouldn't you do it in a method that is painless?
/r/MensRights30/04/16 10:13 PM
8

A lot of the backstories clearly paint some of the inmates mentality' as the cause. You have a woman who deliberately murdered, a woman who clearly was an insane stalker, a woman who robbed banks for the thrill, a woman who smuggled drugs because she enjoyed it, older inmates who had no problem shivving people, etc. And Vee was absolutely toxic. There are some inmates who were there because of misunderstandings and bad luck, but I'd say half are victims and half are there for a reason.
/r/MensRights28/04/16 02:13 PM
2

I had a similar situation happen to me and this wasn't my experience. My ex, who had primary custody at the time, got married and they moved in together. My child support requirement didn't change at all. At least in my state, Michigan, they do not see the new husband as being required to provide for the child - it's still primary up to me and my ex.
/r/MensRights20/04/16 07:24 PM
4

If he gets full custody, not only will she lose that CS but she will have to pay some herself. Not necessarily. I had learned that in some states, it comes down to making sure that the child has a stable environment in both homes, no matter who makes more or less and no matter who the child is mainly with. If this is true, you can have primary custody of your child but if your ex does not make enough to live up to the standards you provide, you may still have to pay support to your ex so that th…
/r/MensRights20/04/16 07:22 PM
7

According to the Associated Press, an investigator in Franklin, Ohio, where the family lived, said Ritchie could hear Austin crying through the night. She allegedly ignored him and told his father not to check on him. Fuck that noise. If my kid is crying through the night, I'm checking on him. She sure as hell is the problem here but why in the hell did Dad not piece together that something was wrong if the kid was crying all fucking night?
/r/MensRights19/04/16 06:32 PM
30

Looks like Ms. Quick didn't read up on Senate Bill 688
/r/MensRights08/04/16 02:52 PM
248

According to the family law lawyer in the article ... This affects child support payments. More timesharing equals less payments. So? Regardless if the child is more bonded with one parent over another Good opportunity to allow the child to bond with the other parent. if one parent works longer hours Like this doesn't already happen. or if the parent has emotional or substance abuse issues Pretty sure this new formula wouldn't rule this out. The bill states: "Requiring a court to consider certai…
/r/MensRights08/04/16 02:45 PM
6

Jail would not help Jail is not supposed to help. The purpose of jail is to keep these people away from doing further damage to people. If this woman has no conscience to say, "Hey, raping my own 1-year-old kid so I can get $300 from another pedo is bad," then what's going to stop her from doing it to someone who she's not related to? Thanks for shedding additional light. But this doesn't help the case.
/r/MensRights08/04/16 12:37 AM
63

My empathy stopped when she sold the video to buy a laptop. For $300. She raped her own son. Three. Hundred. Fucking. Dollars.
/r/MensRights07/04/16 08:38 PM
308

Reading the headline: No fucking way. Reading the story: No fucking way. This is a deep rooted type of evil. For fucks sake, this is incestual pedophilia rape. She is a waste of oxygen.
/r/MensRights07/04/16 04:46 PM
9

I don't see this making it any better for him in the long run. They might back off a bit now that they know he'll fight back. There's also something to say about how he handled it - he didn't punch or kick back but rather tried to incapacitate her a bit. He knew what he was doing and may have more tricks up his sleeve.
/r/MensRights05/04/16 02:13 PM
2

Whatcha' gonna' do when the legal system runs wild on you!
/r/MensRights19/03/16 01:04 PM
18

She deserves them like any other single mum if the father decided to ditch her and leave her with nothing, or if the relationship was abusive and she needed out, or if the father died. Given this was her choice and her conscious decision, she should at least be able to hold a job that will pay for the majority of her bills. She should not get a free pass based on her decision.
/r/MensRights07/03/16 12:16 AM
14

I didn't see a lid pop off, he didn't even flinch to getting hit with water and there was no reaction time. I think it's fake.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/02/16 05:52 PM
22

What about abusive women? Don't confront them? No. I've seen that women can be fucking violent.
/r/MensRights12/02/16 05:24 PM
3

I'd talk to a lawyer. You said she tried to pin it on another guy because he could have provided a better life while knowing you were the Dad. Perhaps there's some loophole there. Is your name on the birth certificate?
/r/MensRights08/02/16 07:34 PM
21

http://divorceformenalabama.com/ They are, at the very least, aiming to help men during divorce from getting screwed over by the legal system.
/r/MensRights07/02/16 05:58 PM
-3

We're just mocking someone here - there are plenty of other subreddits for that.
/r/MensRights06/02/16 09:12 PM
1

Alimony to maintain lifestyle ... you mean unemployment?
/r/MensRights05/02/16 08:16 PM
1

She did.
/r/MensRights20/01/16 08:32 PM
-8

If the kid was 17 and the age of consent in Texas is 17 then both parties weren't breaking any laws. Sure, the age difference may be up for debate ... but from a legal standpoint, nothing illegal happened. Edit: Reworded my logic.
/r/MensRights20/01/16 06:53 PM
1

That's your call. Based on the other responses, it sounds like you two have mutually agreed to leave each other alone. My point is that any type of documentation would benefit you if shit goes south again.
/r/MensRights14/01/16 02:45 AM
1

I would appreciate second opinions, but you should make sure you have these incidents documented - the damage to your car and the restraining order. This shows you have actively requested to have her leave you alone. This way, if she files a RO, they may see you did it first. I wonder why your sister advised against a RO. From here on out, if you talk to her, do so in a method that comes with timestamps. If she goes crazy on you in an email or text, you have written proof of her actions that is …
/r/MensRights13/01/16 04:06 PM
6

Even using a light saber is difficult without tons of training, hence Luke's very gradual rise to effectiveness over the course of three films and Anakin's necessary involvement in the Jedi Order Even as someone who's not a die-hard Star Wars fan, I couldn't get behind this. Just the mechanics behind it. I mean, if the light saber touches you, it either kills or slices, right? So how can someone use it expertly with no experience without the terrifying concern of killing yourself or making even …
/r/MensRights07/01/16 12:22 AM
2

No person in the United States shall, on the basis of sex, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any education program or activity receiving federal financial assistance. So, first off, having more women graduate than men is not what Title IX is about. It's about being fair to all genders. And in my opinion, that's been done. Hell, that was done back when I was in college 10 years ago. Second, are we really going to say the metric t…
/r/MensRights14/12/15 08:14 PM
7

Trial judge Tim Mousley, QC, was told the boy was mature for his age. What does that have to do with anything? Does the maturity of the abused play a factor in the sentence of the abuser? "Your honor, the boy was, in-fact, abused ... she even admitted to her actions ... but because he was mature for his age, does that really make him a victim?" She had made an "abominable mistake and had promptly admitted it," said Mr Ross. So she admitted guilt. Not sure why she isn't in jail. Of course I do. "…
/r/MensRights14/12/15 08:04 PM
9

Teach men/boys not to rape This one bugs me the most. This essentially says that men, in their inherent nature, will want to rape. To me, this goes even beyond feminism. This is saying that anyone who is male is naturally inclined to not respect women to the point where we feel we'd be okay with doing that act. It's ridiculous to have the theory we need to be taught that this is wrong, when in all reality, it's common sense.
/r/MensRights12/12/15 05:02 PM
5

That's a whole different argument. The fact that this is on a sub about men's rights implies gender discrimination. If the evidence checks out, then they're making a decision based off the evidence, not the fact that she's a woman.
/r/MensRights07/11/15 06:08 PM
4

As someone who has worked in advertising in both print & web, I am going to guess that is not the decision of the webmaster, but a decision made by an ad rep. Most (smart) web designers will actively fight against intrusive ads because they risk a decrease in visits.
/r/MensRights21/10/15 07:00 PM
4

No, I grasp it. And I have no problem with Jennifer Lawrence talking about inequality in pay (disregarding the fact that she worked less hours than her male counterparts). But to say that she's underpaid when she makes so much more than everyone else, makes her look bad and a bit greedy.
/r/MensRights20/10/15 04:20 PM
6

Here you go! The highest paid female actor is complaining about being underpaid ...
/r/MensRights20/10/15 03:43 PM
5

Because being rich doesn't suddenly mean you stop giving a shit about people who aren't? Warren Buffet shouldn't speak about philanthropy because he's rich? Warren Buffet doesn't say that he's underpaid. Please provide proof if he's saying he's not getting paid as much as his colleagues. Can you also provide evidence where Jennifer Lawrence mentioned people who don't make a lot of money? Because I recall in the article, she just talked about how she's going to get ballsier and be more strict wit…
/r/MensRights20/10/15 03:33 PM
5

On an overall scale, I understand that any inequalities need to be pointed out. But, a lot of other comments are saying that she worked less than other actors on her films, meaning she actually made more than she led us to believe. I personally think actors in general are ridiculously overpaid. There's a lot of people out there doing a lot of good in the world that live paycheck-to-paycheck. So I don't think it's in good taste to have a net worth of $5 million and be talking about wage inequalit…
/r/MensRights20/10/15 03:27 PM
29

Well, Jennifer Lawrence recently commented that there's a gender pay gap. Of course, I can't fathom why anyone who is worth roughly $5 million should complain about wage gaps. I'll work for $1 million. I'd be fine with being underpaid in that case.
/r/MensRights20/10/15 02:53 PM
26

Yeah, but then you'd be labeled as a rapist. If you don't consent to consent classes, then you don't care about consent!
/r/MensRights16/10/15 06:22 PM
9

I never took a consent class, but I did hear about how I need to respect women's right to privacy through a college orientation. Honestly, I didn't pay attention because what they were saying is something I categorize as common sense.
/r/MensRights16/10/15 06:22 PM
53

I belong to a lost generation of students who did not receive consent classes and, as a consequence, spent three years relentlessly raping each other in a higher education setting. While this probably sounds dreadful to modern ears, in our defence we simply didn't know that it was wrong, because nobody had told us. Whoah. TIL I must be a prodigy because I never had to be taught that raping was wrong ... I just figured it was. Am I the 1%? FINALLY!
/r/MensRights16/10/15 06:20 PM
1

I have a savings account because I will actively avoid using that money and will budget with what I have in checking. Eliminating that ability of using that money by swiping a card is huge for me. That being said - none of this information is shocking. Cost of living is expensive and people are underpaid.
/r/MensRights08/10/15 02:24 PM
5

The 11-year-old who said he didn't want it was raped.
/r/MensRights07/10/15 10:46 PM
8

I still wouldn't call him a pedophile. This guy is the type of guy who would reply with "Nice ..." when he reads a story about a boy being sexually abused by a hot teacher. What's disgusting is that he prioritizes his son getting laid over the fact that his son didn't like it or want it. I posted it in another thread and will say it again - he needs to reevaluate his life. What a fucking scumbag.
/r/MensRights07/10/15 10:18 PM
45

“The victim’s voice appears to have been ignored as, despite his own father claiming that his son was ‘fully up for the experience’, the boy himself said he had not enjoyed it and knew it was wrong. He said: “Having read everything before me, it was quite clear he was a mature 11-year-old and you were an immature 20-year-old so that narrows the arithmetic age gap between you.” What the fuck is wrong with that judge and that father? Holy shit. And the judge is saying that the 11-year-old was matu…
/r/MensRights06/10/15 04:13 PM
7

You sure are a special kind of something.
/r/MensRights21/09/15 06:01 PM
9

She can work. He can't. It's pretty disgusting that she wants the remainder of the money that a disabled veteran has. That's the outrage here. A decent human being wouldn't do that.
/r/MensRights21/09/15 05:59 PM
28

They couldn't say something like "Removed from sex offender list due to inaccurate information" or something like that? Or just not have a subtitle at all?
/r/MensRights20/09/15 02:44 PM
7

Unfortunately, the job of a defense attorney is to help get the "not guilty" plea. I personally do not see how some people can have that particular position and not kill themselves from the guilt of trying to get people who are clearly guilty to be declared innocent. This defense attorney is reaching for straws. Badly. He knows there is no way in hell that he would win this case, so he's grabbing for anything he can. She was not brainwashed, she was insistent and direct about it. I don't see how…
/r/MensRights01/09/15 05:41 PM
2

Okay, so what is going to be the term of being forced, unwillingly, to penetrate?
/r/MensRights23/08/15 08:24 PM
-4

Half of this comic implies that the wife did nothing. Considering they have a kid, the mother did her fair share of the work while you were out at your job. Give credit where it's due. The rest of the comic is pretty much spot on. Either husband or wife can simply say, "I'm done," and lives will be changed permanently - especially if there's a kid. Then, it's generally accepted that the child goes with the mother. Then, you gotta' make sure that the child doesn't go through dramatic lifestyle ch…
/r/MensRights09/08/15 01:07 PM
1

Not only did they laugh about it, but they also made jokes justifying it. Really bothersome. Thanks to Sarah for pointing out the hypocrisy and to Leah for having pretty much nothing to do with the conversation.
/r/MensRights28/07/15 03:12 AM
2

The message I was hoping to get across is that he/she appears to dismiss anyones response by asking for statistical data. Even when Affirmative Action was an answer to an example of an area where white people are disadvantaged, he/she brushed it off (and as touchy of a subject AA is, I agree that if a more-qualified white person loses out on a job because of AA, that is an area where a white person is disadvantaged). But data is very important and allows us to provide our opinions without it bei…
/r/MensRights22/07/15 12:12 PM
1

I think it's less the topic and more of you dismissing what they're saying unless they provide some statistical data proving what they say. I personally have never really seen the race card played in this sub, and I've been around for over a year, but I'm not going to say you're wrong and ask for statistical data ... I'm just going to believe you based on your experience.
/r/MensRights21/07/15 11:31 PM
8

Are you stupid or something? The comment I made was in reply to this: If this is how your posts come across, I can understand why you're downvoted.
/r/MensRights21/07/15 11:05 PM
1

Isn't this a bit ironic? We're being down voted for having a differing opinion than everyone else on this thread
/r/MensRights01/07/15 04:28 PM
7

Sure, her answer was sarcastic but your reply was just as sarcastic. You guys weren't talking about the question, you both derailed the conversation. It's possible the mod first saw and interjected after your second reply. Now, if you had also gotten that comment when trying to discuss the topic OP wanted to talk about, then that'd be a different story.
/r/MensRights30/06/15 10:16 PM
-4

To be fair, you did become pretty sarcastic there.
/r/MensRights30/06/15 10:01 PM
2

I wouldn't have him talk to her. Any idea that he may do this could backfire. Cease communication, but lurk and screenshot any defamation.
/r/MensRights11/06/15 06:56 PM
9

I would keep all documentation from her and invest in a lawyer. It's not about not starting a MRA debate, it's about protecting yourself. Also ask about going after her for defamation. If she's dragging your name through the mud when you can prove innocence, you may be able to strike back at her. Keep your cool and keep calm. If she's going apeshit while you're being reserved, it may help show who the rational one is.
/r/MensRights11/06/15 04:48 PM
27

He wouldn't even see a year because he'd be murdered in prison.
/r/MensRights10/06/15 11:25 AM
2

Absolutely. Both have their pluses and minuses. And while one involves nurturing the child, the other is making sure they have a comfortable environment to be nurtured in.
/r/MensRights15/05/15 01:09 AM
26

First, I stopped reading after I read "Men are pathetic creatures really," so I don't know what the other 98% of the article said. Second, I would love to be a stay-at-home caretaker.
/r/MensRights14/05/15 02:26 PM
45

I can't load the video, but was glad to hear someone calling out this ridiculous double-standard. The idea that they busted out in laughter is disgusting. And the fact they laughed after he talked about why and how he was hospitalized is fucking ridiculous.
/r/MensRights12/05/15 07:39 PM
3

That's pretty common when asking for most financial assistance.
/r/MensRights05/05/15 12:10 PM
3

I saw this on Facebook and dared to read the comments. Sure enough, it was flooded with, "Why couldn't I have teachers like this," and "Whoever turned her in is gay."
/r/MensRights05/04/15 01:41 PM
7

Men would actually be expected to give up their seat ... but let's not mention that little fact!
/r/MensRights08/03/15 04:10 PM
2

Have her head shaved and fix a beard on her, and she'll go to jail!
/r/MensRights07/03/15 03:30 PM
2

But ... it's also because of the patriarchy that she's unable to work, because her stupid husband provided for her for all these years. /s
/r/MensRights24/02/15 12:48 AM
5

1 - It can be a touchy subject. It can be perceived that you are planning for the marriage to fail. 2 - People think that they'll be married for life so they'll have no need for one. (I personally think each marriage needs some form of a prenup. It's really a win-win ... if you're sure you'll be together forever, just do it and sign it, you won't need it. And if it fails, well, then you'll be glad you signed it if one person decides to get greedy)
/r/MensRights24/02/15 12:46 AM
1

It looks like it just means that OP deleted the reddit thread, but since we had some comments in it, it didn't delete it completely. I ended up deleting a thread that I posted in yesterday (duplicate post) and saw on my comment history that the comment was left by [deleted], when I'm still around. :)
/r/MensRights21/02/15 06:24 PM
2

My guess: Slender "Man" stabbing, not reading article, blind post.
/r/MensRights17/02/15 07:24 PM
2

Just out of curiosity, why is this posted here? Both the accused and victim are female.
/r/MensRights17/02/15 07:14 PM
10

Ugh, and there's only about two comments on here that mention this. C'mon, /r/MensRights, you're better than this.
/r/MensRights14/02/15 02:12 AM
14

Parks & Rec has a tendency to make their townsfolk be ridiculously neurotic, such as a lady finding a sandwich in a park and complaining because it didn't have mayonnaise on it. Or how they needed to have 10 different time capsules to accommodate everyone's request to put their precious items in the capsule - whether it's a book or the ashes of a dead cat. My point is, it's not uncommon for groups and people on that show to have ridiculous questions, requests and motives. I haven't seen the epis…
/r/MensRights13/02/15 05:51 PM
7

I did a brief search on Amy Poehler and her views on feminism and all I got was comments that are geared more towards gender equality, which I'm fine with. I didn't see anything related to how men are scum, don't deserve rights, etc.
/r/MensRights13/02/15 05:39 PM
6

Do you think the show was poking fun at the issue or making a statement about how MRM isn't taken seriously? I watch the show relatively religiously on Netflix and generally feel like their topics have a relevance to real life events. Since the new episodes aren't on Netflix, I can't take a look for myself.
/r/MensRights13/02/15 04:35 PM
1

It's a fine line, I'll give you that. And you have common sense, so you know you're not supposed to do those things. Unfortunately - it still happens, so raising awareness is beneficial ... even if it's educating people on how much you can screw up your life if you do those things or if you throw out false claims. All it's probably going to accomplish is make more boys paranoid about girls and dating True, a boy shouldn't be worried to date someone, but if their life can be seriously ruined mere…
/r/MensRights04/02/15 06:16 PM
5

I'm not opposed to this ... as long as it's taught equally. Luckily, unless I missed something, there wasn't anything in the article that implied that this is only for males.
/r/MensRights04/02/15 12:30 PM
9

I can completely believe that.
/r/MensRights16/01/15 03:34 PM
1

Well, we've learned two things from Feminists within the past four months: Don't be a woman and say you love taking care of your man, and don't wear a unique shirt that will be outrageous to feminists. Of course, the shirt incident is only the guys fault ... because he chose to wear the outfit ...
/r/MensRights04/01/15 03:32 PM
3

It appears so, since you didn't understand what an agent does.
/r/MensRights04/01/15 03:24 PM
1

Which school? It's not a college in Michigan, is it? Edit: Nevermind Feminist Student Union ... It's too early ...
/r/MensRights05/12/14 01:29 PM
1

FSU ... please tell me this isn't Ferris.
/r/MensRights04/12/14 04:43 PM
3

I think CPS most definitely has the resources to devote time to each and every case. My ex-wife initiated a CPS investigation for her second child that wasn't even mine and I had CPS contact me and ask me questions. They later stopped by my house to interview me again ... when the investigation was initially towards a daycare. They asked me if I was ever around the child, about the daycare, about the parents, etc. When I said that I was around the child because of a surgery that involved my (her…
/r/MensRights03/12/14 04:27 PM
1

Someone who will truly care about the kids and wants legitimate results won't care about statistics. Everyone in an investigation would be suspect. Even the people filing the report. Even the women. (I'm not saying you're wrong, by the way)
/r/MensRights03/12/14 11:58 AM
3

I found that ironic, seeing as how the results of a CPS investigation could be just as damaging ... if not more.
/r/MensRights03/12/14 11:55 AM
2

Actually, with all that is happening, it should still be newsworthy. Philae isn't in an ideal spot, isn't getting the sun exposure it should and is risking losing power. ESA is working and toying with trying to move it to a better spot, and that has its own risks. I don't care about the shirt issue. I care that this project may end soon.
/r/MensRights14/11/14 06:02 PM
1

I don't give a fuck about his shirt. I give a fuck about the fact that the project may end soon because Philae is not in a good spot to get enough sun exposure to charge it's batteries.
/r/MensRights14/11/14 06:00 PM
2

<insert your over-exaggerated opinion here> Imagine a bowl of M&Ms 10% of them are poisoned. Go ahead. Eat a handfull. Not all M&Ms are poisoned.
/r/MensRights05/11/14 11:43 PM
14

The answer to this would be that men should not be forced to sign up for the draft then. I get your point, and would say it's a valid point (which should not be downvoted), so the real answer is to not force the draft.
/r/MensRights19/10/14 12:34 AM
6

See, I'm truly gender neutral. I'm all for my fiancé making all the money and me being a housedad.
/r/MensRights18/10/14 06:15 PM
24

She won't be charged. The husband is guilty of forcing it and the teenager is guilty of doing it. The woman is the victim here. I, of course, am talking out of my ass - but you know this is an argument being made.
/r/MensRights27/09/14 05:57 PM
3

I commend you for thinking this. I personally don't believe you, but it's nice to think that this may be a possibility.
/r/MensRights27/09/14 05:54 PM
4

His abusers were his grandparents? Where in the article does it state that?
/r/MensRights24/09/14 04:55 PM
0

This is a bad case to advocate Men's Rights. I'm not going to defend some little sociopath that killed his grandparents. And I don't care if he's a kid, you take a life, you deserve to get judged as an adult. We're not talking about vandalism, theft or anything minor. This involves premeditated murder. The only reason I hope this gets exposure is so that kids can see that this "he's just a kid" veil doesn't apply to everything.
/r/MensRights24/09/14 12:56 PM
3

The same could be said for prostate cancer. It looks like we should shift money from both prostate and breast cancer and invest in heart disease.
/r/MensRights28/08/14 03:39 PM
6

Is that person's username really "pickfights?"
/r/MensRights18/08/14 10:47 PM
1

That's good to hear. I figured with a number change also came a new phone so it'd be a different SIM card. The only workaround I could think of is if the number was changed with the same provider, giving a paper trail. Still, nice to hear it's still possible if OP could get law enforcement and the courts behind him.
/r/MensRights13/08/14 08:38 PM
11

I do not find it coincidental that Chris Pratt has become massively popular after he toned up. Lego Movie and GotG were great, but Chris Pratt has been awesome since he was in P&R, where he was much more doughy.
/r/MensRights13/08/14 05:09 PM
8

Two questions - Have you alerted the courts on this? She lied to them, so that's a big cause for them to get involved. Do you know if she actively uses a smartphone with GPS enabled? Its a long shot but I know google has assisted with stuff like this when asked by authorities. If she has GPS enabled on her phone and is asked by authorities, google or Apple may be able to provide recent coorfinates. Edit - sorry, forgot that she changed her number, so GPS may not work.
/r/MensRights13/08/14 04:54 PM
5

Probably their way of trying to add insult.
/r/MensRights13/08/14 12:30 PM
10

Well, it's your fault really. You didn't have to make a good living, or get a good car or a good job. Your hope and goal of providing a good life to your family is your fault, so if the family breaks apart, it only makes sense that you continue to provide the quality of life you gave them in the first place even if it costs you your quality of life. Wait. That doesn't make sense.
/r/MensRights12/08/14 06:58 PM
15

And they were going to do that by taking him to a hospital and giving him a drug that would cause an erection to happen. So, they'd be forcing him to take a drug and forcing him to have an erection against his will.
/r/MensRights11/07/14 10:46 AM
1

If you're going to try and insult me, at least have the decency to keep my original quote intact. If this is what you really think, you are actually the delusional one.
/r/MensRights10/07/14 09:27 PM
2

But what judge will think it's legal to take a minor to a hospital, give him a drug that will force an erection, then have the police take pictures or a minor's private part so they can compare it to a video that was sent to only their girlfriend?
/r/MensRights10/07/14 12:31 AM
94

It's such an absurd request, most sane doctors should worry about losing their license if they did this.
/r/MensRights09/07/14 05:31 PM
123

Yeah, it doesn't matter ... my point was that if he is still considered a minor by the state, she produced and distributed to a minor. She should get in as much trouble as him ... yet only he's being punished.
/r/MensRights09/07/14 05:28 PM
935

Holy shit. This is flat out ridiculous. So, the 15 year old girl sends naked pictures to a 17 year old ... who may still be considered a minor ... and nothing is done. If he is considered a minor according to the state, she distributed child pornography to a minor. The 17 year old sends content back and they want to use the law to force an erection so they can compare? And have him registered as a sex offender? This is the type of case to present to judges to determine their qualification. If an…
/r/MensRights09/07/14 04:11 PM
2

No doubt about that. If it were, jail time wouldn't even be a consideration
/r/MensRights28/06/14 04:18 PM
2

In this case, the guy is getting screwed. His employer didn't make the payments and he is going to jail because of it. And the fact that he is turning himself in and actually paid additional child support makes this much more of a bullshit case because he is being 100% accommodating and is still getting locked up. Whether the payer just doesn't pay or gets locked up for not paying - the end result is the same, the child is not getting the support they deserve. So they either need to rework how t…
/r/MensRights28/06/14 03:50 PM
1

I think he would still be liable for support while in prison, meaning he'll have a backlog of support to pay when he's let out.
/r/MensRights28/06/14 12:13 PM
3

How to be a man - take care of yourself, those you love and be nice to people. Infact, let's take the gender out ... How to be a good person - take care of yourself, those you love and be nice to people.
/r/MensRights05/06/14 01:44 PM
18

So she is going to get off birth control and essentially trap him into a situation he can never get out of, and she is implying you're the bad guy?
/r/MensRights02/05/14 05:04 PM
7

That's because gender is irrelevant to violence. We are just a violent species in general.
/r/MensRights04/04/14 12:42 PM
9

I read a thread awhile ago about a Dad whose child died suddenly in their sleep. The tragic thing was that he didn't move or touch the child after the discovery for fear that the police would somehow accuse him. The fact that people feel the need to have that mentality is depressing.
/r/MensRights27/02/14 12:01 AM
28

To her credit, yes. However my point was that her sympathy towards this issue only popped up when it directly affected her family. Added: Here is the problem ... Until a month ago, I would have expressed unqualified support for Title IX and for the Violence Against Women Act. But that was before my son, a senior at a small liberal-arts college in New England, was charged—by an ex-girlfriend—with alleged acts of "nonconsensual sex" that supposedly occurred during the course of their relationship …
/r/MensRights15/01/14 04:58 PM
79

On one hand, yes, let's not be bitter about it. On the other hand, she showed no compassion until she was hit personally with it. Had this not happened to her son, nothing would have changed.
/r/MensRights15/01/14 03:57 PM
2

I've also read that time doesn't matter, it's the income. If the father makes more than then mother, he may still have to pay child support, even if he has thebchild more, in order to balance it out so the child has similar living styles between the two.
/r/MensRights19/12/13 01:13 AM
5

The only accountability is that the guy pays up. After that, nobody gives a shit whether the money goes to the child.
/r/MensRights19/12/13 01:11 AM
2

Your situation is unique because the child and mother reside in another country. It could be based off the state you're in, or it could be based on Canadian laws. Heck, it could be entirely different because you two live in different countries. - I really am not sure and would talk to your lawyer about this.
/r/MensRights12/10/13 07:50 PM
2

http://www.lawqa.com/qa/do-i-have-to-pay-back-child-support-if-i-just-found-out-i-am-father Here's what I based my edit upon. According to that site, it varies state-by-state. But as I told OP in another reply, don't trust what I say or what the internet says, talk to a lawyer about this because they're up-to-date on all this stuff.
/r/MensRights12/10/13 05:30 PM
2

Here is what I based my edit upon: http://www.lawqa.com/qa/do-i-have-to-pay-back-child-support-if-i-just-found-out-i-am-father I live in Michigan, and I recall hearing that a mother has 5 years to order a paternity test to help get support. Outside that 5-year range, you aren't obligated for any back support. But, according to that site, it ranges from state-to-state. Your questions of why she didn't contact you sooner are absolutely legitimate. But don't go by what I say or the internet says, a…
/r/MensRights12/10/13 05:26 PM
1

I think policies on paying nack support like this vary depending on where you're living. He may or may not have to pay back support. OP would want to talk to his lawyer about it.
/r/MensRights12/10/13 01:23 PM
1

Are you sure about the support thing? I thought there was a certain number of years to prove paternity to enforce support payments. After a certain number of years, its no longer applicable. He may have to pay future support, but since the mom didn't react within X years, he's not responsible for back support. Edit: I looked it up a bit and the rules of support in these types of situation seem to vary by where you live.
/r/MensRights12/10/13 01:19 PM
14

The concerning thing is that boredom is the #1 reason, IMO. It's not all fun and games, but I think our generation has a short attention span in general, so when things stop being fun, they just move on. Relationships are difficult, and I just think people want to split for something new instead of working on it. I mean, people can do what they want, but we got the "short attention span" label for a reason.
/r/MensRights19/06/13 06:36 PM
13

Wife approval? Never heard of that. Is there husband approvals needed for married ladies getting their tubes tied?
/r/MensRights20/02/13 07:07 PM
9

Wait, Isn't marriage a requirement for medical coverage? And if the marriage ends, the insurance company will terminate the spouses coverage?
/r/MensRights14/01/13 07:10 PM
17

I don't give a rats ass how emotional a person may be, you don't threaten to keep a parent from their child.
/r/MensRights31/10/12 06:40 PM
-1

Please get video of this.
/r/MensRights20/09/12 06:19 PM
1

Why is the quality of type between some of the responses different in clarity?
/r/MensRights15/09/12 05:53 PM
2

It should all depend on the person pulling the divorce trigger and the validation behind it. If your mother cheated on your father who was a stay at home father, then perhaps he should be rewarded something - after all, it wasn't his fault. However, if your father decided to leave for no valid reason (and by valid, I mean abuse, fear, etc.) then he should not be entitled to anything. The problem I have with awarded alimony and child support is that the person who initiates the divorce is sometim…
/r/MensRights11/09/12 03:56 AM
1

OP shows no interest of wanting to get to know the child, though, even down the line. That's what bugs me. It's not the kids fault the idiot mother didn't make sure he knew about it.
/r/MensRights02/08/12 11:07 AM
1

It was in the divorce agreement, not ordered by the state. I paid the child support at the time and had my son listed as the beneficiary.
/r/MensRights02/08/12 10:51 AM
3

He still could have shown interest/effort in getting to know the child. Instead, he'll only worry about the money taken out of his small 6-figure income.
/r/MensRights02/08/12 04:10 AM
2

Are you serious? I guess that does explain why the woes are all finance-related, as opposed to just now finding out that you had another child that you've never met. At least try to get the interest accrued removed - the rest of it, yeah, you should pay.
/r/MensRights02/08/12 02:21 AM
7

They can legally take up to 50% of your paycheck, I believe.
/r/MensRights02/08/12 02:17 AM
1

I don't think so. Only reason I say this is because I was required to take out life insurance in the event that I passed away. They probably wouldn't do that if it would be required afterwards. Could vary by state, too.
/r/MensRights02/08/12 02:16 AM
8

in any other case it further restricts their ability to pay When I first started paying child support, I was amazed at what they could do if payments weren't being received. Two of them - revoking a license and jail time - are completely counterproductive on many parts. How can you pay child support and spend time with the child if you can't drive or are behind bars? Luckily, these are last measure resorts.
/r/MensRights02/08/12 02:05 AM
4

Yes, you're fucked. But it's only money When you're living on a tight budget where something unexpected can put you in the red, it'll be in the back of your head and slowly wear you down. It's only money when you have a lot of it to spare. When you contemplate how you are going to pay your bills in the next few months because you are spending more than you're earning, it's very hard to say, "Eh, well, it's only money."
/r/MensRights02/08/12 01:54 AM
8

Revoking the drivers license is one of the penalties for not paying child support - at least in my state.
/r/MensRights02/08/12 01:39 AM
1

If he makes more than $30,000 a year, I highly doubt he'd receive disability even if the case was made that he does have one.
/r/MensRights29/07/12 12:21 AM
2

No-fault divorces really piss me off. A persons life can be changed forever just because someone wants out. Could be the healthiest relationship you've seen, all it takes is one person saying "I'm done," and lives are changed forever.
/r/MensRights29/07/12 12:20 AM
2

Oh, she would know who he was - he would the father who killed himself. And if his ex is as much as a bitch that OP says she is, she would pass that information down to the daughter.
/r/MensRights29/07/12 12:18 AM
2

I filed for full custody of my child about a month ago. When I found out she could get a free lawyer because she was no-income, I looked into getting a laywer ... I'd be looking at a $1500 retainer fee for an event that would last one day. One thing people fail to realize is that this stuff costs a lot of money and a lot of time investment - and a lot of time people don't have either to throw away.
/r/MensRights29/07/12 12:16 AM
2

This doesn't even make sense. The WORD Mom isn't in there, it should say "Home is not Home without 'OM'"
/r/MensRights24/06/12 12:01 AM
1

Well, realizing that you are now a paycheck can be pretty crushing. Oh, a paycheck that has to pay regardless of financial/job status ...
/r/MensRights11/05/12 01:23 AM
2

Why is this comment getting downvoted? Its is the people with preferential treatment that's the cause of inequality, not the entirety of a specific gender or race. C'mon, /r/MensRights ...
/r/MensRights26/04/12 11:14 AM
-3

Do not give me this false equivalence bullshit... Men voluntarily gave up their preferential treatment of rights by enacting the 19th Amendment which gave women the vote. Which happened in 1920. If there hadn't been some form of bias/discrimination, women would have had the ability to vote since the beginning. Skatanic has it right, equality will never happen because too few people who get preferential treatment want it. It's not tied to one specific gender.
/r/MensRights26/04/12 11:11 AM
1

I've always thought an independent bank should be setup specifically for child support and nothing else - the child support recipient is given a card to spend it on (this is actually what my ex has). Then, every six months or so, a monthly statement is sent to the Friend of the Court so they can see exactly what she's spending it on. If she's spending it on stuff that isn't for the child, the child support is lowered. Additionally, any child support each month that isn't used is put into a savin…
/r/MensRights14/04/12 03:22 PM
1

The only way I could agree with this, is if the area you're living in has a higher cost of living. I really can't think of anything to buy specifically for the child that would equal out to $500.
/r/MensRights14/04/12 03:19 PM
8

What a sad state of affairs we live in when the amount of child support some people are asking for a MONTH exceed my yearly income twice over. Honestly, legitimate child support shouldn't go over $500/month. That's plenty to buy clothes and any supplies the child needs. Food, bills, etc? Yeah, you can pay for that on your own. Hell, I'd even argue $500/month is too much.
/r/MensRights14/04/12 05:11 AM
1

There's a LOT wrong with modern marriage, and it's one of the big reasons our society is crumbling. The problem is we've made marriage entirely unattractive and with no advantage for men. I'd argue the other reason marriage is so fragile these days is because either one or both parties can't stick with it. They either bail because they don't want to do it anymore or one/both becomes unfaithful. My views on marriage are all but shattered due to many marriages I've seen over the years that have en…
/r/MensRights06/04/12 01:07 AM
2

Wait, he's possibly going to jail for essentially telling the truth?
/r/MensRights19/03/12 05:14 PM
1

Neither in Michigan - I'd guess that's a rule most state follow by.
/r/MensRights16/03/12 10:50 PM
14

I don't get the math of 33% your income going to support when you have him almost as much as she does. With her having your kid a whopping 3 days more than you in a month, you should barely be paying anything.
/r/MensRights16/03/12 05:25 PM
2

Okay. I hope I didn't come off as rude or crass(sp?) because that wasn't the intention but a lot of comments on these kind of threads always say "no marriage or kids," and I begin to wonder if they think they're exempt from this one-sided system because they aren't married.
/r/MensRights01/03/12 11:14 PM
7

You do realize that marriage has nothing to do with it. If you get a girl pregnant, you're on the hook.
/r/MensRights01/03/12 11:42 AM
15

Okay, was I the only one expecting to click on the link and having it be a blank image?
/r/MensRights25/02/12 10:46 PM
2

You must have done some history regarding it. When I typed in "How" I got "How I Met Your Mother."
/r/MensRights19/02/12 12:28 AM
8

Do we know that the support paid is actually going to the child? I have no idea where the support I pay goes to. What I do know was that my ex - who lives primarily off the government - got a new tattoo of a MPS ribbon (a genetic disease our son has) and recently traded their car in for a newer one. On another note, in Michigan, child support can not exceed more than 50% of the income of the person paying the support.
/r/MensRights05/02/12 04:43 PM
3

You know what's really sad? Some states allow no-reason divorces... Meaning all your spouse would have to do to is say "I'm done," and bam, your life is dramatically changed.
/r/MensRights05/02/12 03:04 PM
6

It really is sad that stuff like this makes people glad that they can't have kids or prevents them from wanting to have kids. Stories like this show that the government/mothers essentially take fatherhood and turn it into an expensive bill that the father will owe regardless of employment or not.
/r/MensRights03/02/12 02:30 AM
2

From what I've read, your brother can report her to the police for denying visitation. Neither parent can deny visitation under normal circumstances.
/r/MensRights11/11/11 01:45 AM
2

That's just it - you need proof and they can throw out whatever reason they can for not hiring you. Plus, if they do have some guts hired, that's just more ammo for them. "Sir, as you can see, we employ men ... This person is just upset because we didn't hire him because (insert any reason here)."
/r/MensRights22/10/11 07:56 PM
4

40-year-old virgin. Wasn't accusing you of being like Andy, but that's just the first thing that popped into my head when I read that.
/r/MensRights14/10/11 07:54 PM
3

You know what? I respect women! I love women! I respect them so much that I completely stay away from them!
/r/MensRights14/10/11 06:30 PM
-7

You say consent is agreeing to something and not being completely enthused about it. So, in the case of having sex - do you really want the other person to do it and not be completely enthused about it? Sex shouldn't be lumped in with lawsuits, agreements, etc. either. Because Party A wants one thing and Party B wants another - and both can't win in those scenarios. But when it comes to sex - I'd rather both parties be completely into it. What I'm asking for is not impossible - it's a mere ackno…
/r/MensRights09/09/11 05:06 PM
-3

Well, I should have probably said in my original comment, I don't condine the disciplinary action they're trying to go with at all. My point was more along the lines of that if either party doesn't want to have sex, that person shouldn't feel pressured into doing it. While it was consensual, they still ultimately didn't want to have sex ... they did it to shut the other person up. (Sorry if this is a duplicate post. Reddit's being weird)
/r/MensRights09/09/11 04:14 PM
-13

My response would be that if she/he says no to sex, let it go until later. However, if you keep asking for it after they've said no, then that's when it get excessive. In my opinion, if someone has sex just to shut the other person up and stop the pressuring ... then it's not 100% consensual. Sure, they're saying it's okay to have sex ... but they still don't really want to do it.
/r/MensRights09/09/11 04:02 PM
-10

To achieve this goal, colleges employ fuzzy and legally questionable sexual misconduct policies that punish males for engaging in even consensual sexual behavior obtained by emotional or verbal "pressuring" (e.g., cajoling, coaxing, or nagging) if a woman complains about it. Well, to be perfectly honest ... nobody should be pressured into having sex. If they don't want to have sex, respect their decision. Added: To clarify, I don't condone what they're trying to do, because in the end - the acts…
/r/MensRights09/09/11 03:38 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter