| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1367 | No, Plastics Are Not Lowering Your Testosterone Levels - Real Science Explained Inside | Science | InvoluntarySickCunt | /r/TheRedPill | 08/09/17 06:16 AM |
| 487 | Testosterone Is Decreasing by 1.1% Per Year - The Science Of Why and How To Stop It (ISC's Science Discussion Series 1) | Science | InvoluntarySickCunt | /r/TheRedPill | 13/09/17 03:13 AM |
| 110 | The Dopamine Reward Circuits & How To Exploit Them (ISC's Science Discussion Series 2) | Science | InvoluntarySickCunt | /r/TheRedPill | 05/10/17 03:56 AM |
| 57 | A Paradigm For Overcoming Procrastination and Utilizing Discipline Effectively | Red Pill Theory | InvoluntarySickCunt | /r/TheRedPill | 21/06/17 02:30 AM |
| 28 | Imitation and The Way of Men | Building Power | InvoluntarySickCunt | /r/TheRedPill | 03/09/17 11:40 PM |
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | Testosterone Is Decreasing by 1.1% Per Year - The Science Of Why and How To Stop It (ISC's Science Discussion Series 1)If you have a source for this i would be glad to include it | /r/TheRedPill | 18/09/17 10:12 PM |
| 1 | Testosterone Is Decreasing by 1.1% Per Year - The Science Of Why and How To Stop It (ISC's Science Discussion Series 1)They are molecular markers defined in the paper. I didn't quote the definitions because they are sufficiently complex to be meaningless to most people. | /r/TheRedPill | 15/09/17 04:15 PM |
| 5 | Testosterone Is Decreasing by 1.1% Per Year - The Science Of Why and How To Stop It (ISC's Science Discussion Series 1)This is actually something that I'd like to address in another post. Not sourcing, of course, but harm mitigation and common misconceptions. On that note, if anyone has extensive experience with hormonal supplementation please PM me and perhaps we can work together on this. | /r/TheRedPill | 14/09/17 11:55 PM |
| 2 | Testosterone Is Decreasing by 1.1% Per Year - The Science Of Why and How To Stop It (ISC's Science Discussion Series 1)Sounds very interesting I'll check out those Price papers. Thanks! | /r/TheRedPill | 14/09/17 11:53 PM |
| 2 | Testosterone Is Decreasing by 1.1% Per Year - The Science Of Why and How To Stop It (ISC's Science Discussion Series 1)I think you're on the right track but id like to add that the cholesterol that T is derived from is actually itself derived from dietary fats. The fatty acid chains undergo multiple ring closures to create the steroid platform. | /r/TheRedPill | 14/09/17 10:19 PM |
| 1 | Testosterone Is Decreasing by 1.1% Per Year - The Science Of Why and How To Stop It (ISC's Science Discussion Series 1)That is certainly a more elegant way of describing the relationship. Thank you! | /r/TheRedPill | 13/09/17 07:52 PM |
| 1 | Testosterone Is Decreasing by 1.1% Per Year - The Science Of Why and How To Stop It (ISC's Science Discussion Series 1)The father's had decreased T compared to those without children. | /r/TheRedPill | 13/09/17 06:45 PM |
| 1 | Testosterone Is Decreasing by 1.1% Per Year - The Science Of Why and How To Stop It (ISC's Science Discussion Series 1)I think it must be their monkish robes brushing against the nuts in just the right way! You know what they say about the angle of the dangle, after all. Thanks for the morning laugh! | /r/TheRedPill | 13/09/17 03:16 PM |
| 6 | Testosterone Is Decreasing by 1.1% Per Year - The Science Of Why and How To Stop It (ISC's Science Discussion Series 1)I'm be happy to share some thoughts. So the first thing to note here is that the cohort here has a geometric mean urinary excretion of BPA in the range of 5.63 ug/day. The confidence interval here is a 95%er so we can say that if we selected a random person from this cohort there's a 95% chance they would have BPA excretion between 3.42-3.77 ng/mL of urine / day. Let's keep that in mind as we continue. Next thing to note is that the study finds the younger and fatter a subject is the higher thei… | /r/TheRedPill | 13/09/17 04:49 AM |
| 8 | Testosterone Is Decreasing by 1.1% Per Year - The Science Of Why and How To Stop It (ISC's Science Discussion Series 1)That's certainly a valid argument from an evolutionary psychology perspective. Increased estradiol may increase that bonding and care taking dynamic. I would argue, however, that due to the advent of society and the feminization of the Western family that a hormonal increase in empathy is likely not necessary anymore. Is TRT the way to go? Well it's purely speculation and the suggestion shouldn't be taken lightly but I think it's an idea that should be explored. | /r/TheRedPill | 13/09/17 04:26 AM |
| 12 | Testosterone Is Decreasing by 1.1% Per Year - The Science Of Why and How To Stop It (ISC's Science Discussion Series 1)Please note that the cohort in the Travison et al study was 55+ years of age. We cannot extend the trend below that with certainty. However, if we suspect that the cause of the drop is environmental in nature then it would be a strong indicator that your statement would be true, if not an understatement. | /r/TheRedPill | 13/09/17 04:19 AM |
| 4 | Testosterone Is Decreasing by 1.1% Per Year - The Science Of Why and How To Stop It (ISC's Science Discussion Series 1)Fascinating thought, do you have any thoughts or evidence detailing what specifically Mg, or a lack thereof, could be affecting? Biologically speaking, Mg serves as a necessary co-factor for many enzymes (in the same way that iron ions are integrated into hemaglobin), I suspect a deficit would lead to overall degredation of the proteome as well as autophagy. | /r/TheRedPill | 13/09/17 04:11 AM |
| 20 | Testosterone Is Decreasing by 1.1% Per Year - The Science Of Why and How To Stop It (ISC's Science Discussion Series 1)Thanks for the praise man! I hope to one day reach Dr. Peterson's level of intellect and impact. I think he's given me more to think about than just about anyone else recently, as well as serving as a jumping off point for Jungian psychology. In the mean time I'm happy to contribute from my niche, TRP and the vanguard posts of years ago have shaped my behaviors and mindsets irrevocably and any expertise I can add is a drop in the bucket. In regards to the dadbod, this is something I hadn't even … | /r/TheRedPill | 13/09/17 04:07 AM |
| 1 | No, Plastics Are Not Lowering Your Testosterone Levels - Real Science Explained Insideinstead of defending plastics in regards to the small scope of direct human impact, try thinking of the bigger picture. The world is not going to miss plastics if they ever go away. The world will however miss the O2 production the oceans provide us if we fuck them up. My goal isn't to defend plastics, but rather to make a broader commentary on scientific literacy. However, I don't think you realize the vast scope of application of plastics. Sure you can swap out bags for cloth, but in many appl… | /r/TheRedPill | 12/09/17 07:41 PM |
| 3 | No, Plastics Are Not Lowering Your Testosterone Levels - Real Science Explained InsideFascinating article, thank you for bringing it to my attention. I'm going to dedicate a new top level post to this phenomenon as it seems to be of general interest as well. | /r/TheRedPill | 09/09/17 03:09 AM |
| 3 | No, Plastics Are Not Lowering Your Testosterone Levels - Real Science Explained InsideI thank you sincerely for the thoughtful feedback. I hadn't considered that perspective and was writing hastily right before bed; I got a bit lazy. I still think my criticisms of the original articles stand for themselves despite the tone- but again- thank you. This kind of dialogue is what makes this community unique. | /r/TheRedPill | 09/09/17 02:25 AM |
| 2 | No, Plastics Are Not Lowering Your Testosterone Levels - Real Science Explained InsideI believe that, as GLO mentioned in his front page post earlier today, the key to having an informative and impactful post is to match the style to the audience. You're absolutely correct that the post is flippant; i wrote it that way by design to gain the attention of the young men who make up the audience. From my perspective, getting people thinking critically is the ultimate goal. In the comments below I've picked through several other studies on BPA specifically to demonstrate how oftentime… | /r/TheRedPill | 08/09/17 11:55 PM |
| 2 | No, Plastics Are Not Lowering Your Testosterone Levels - Real Science Explained InsidePlease see above. | /r/TheRedPill | 08/09/17 10:43 PM |
| 2 | No, Plastics Are Not Lowering Your Testosterone Levels - Real Science Explained InsideFor BPA, the lowest dose studied for risk assessment purposes was 50 mg/kg/day, which is the currently accepted lowest observed adverse effect level (LOAEL) that was used to calculate a reference dose of 50 μg/kg/day based on experiments conducted in the 1980s (IRIS 1988). BPA is often described as a very “weak” estrogen because in a few assay systems, such as MCF-7 breast cancer cells in culture, the dose of BPA required to stimulate cell proliferation (~ 10−7 M or 23 ppb) is roughly 100,000 ti… | /r/TheRedPill | 08/09/17 10:14 PM |
| 9 | No, Plastics Are Not Lowering Your Testosterone Levels - Real Science Explained InsideThe burden of proof lays on the person making the claim and extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. | /r/TheRedPill | 08/09/17 09:54 PM |
| 8 | No, Plastics Are Not Lowering Your Testosterone Levels - Real Science Explained InsideI will be attempting to address this from multiple angles in a followup post in the next few days. Stay tuned. | /r/TheRedPill | 08/09/17 09:46 PM |
| 8 | No, Plastics Are Not Lowering Your Testosterone Levels - Real Science Explained InsideMy claim is that the presented evidence from the post I've responded to is not sufficient to make that claim. As I've mentioned below it is well documented that in vitro stimulation of cells with bisphenols and pthalate esters can result in an estrogen-like response. Are you claiming that in the general population, xenoestrogens from plastic use has contributed to a meaningful and measurable drop in serum free testosterone? I'm ready to be convinced if the work exists, but cell culture based ass… | /r/TheRedPill | 08/09/17 09:01 PM |
| 2 | No, Plastics Are Not Lowering Your Testosterone Levels - Real Science Explained InsideWant to help make it daily? | /r/TheRedPill | 08/09/17 04:07 PM |
| 4 | No, Plastics Are Not Lowering Your Testosterone Levels - Real Science Explained InsideWhy you should trust my judgement: I am a molecular biologist and immunologist who is active in the academic sphere and have expertise in in vitro cellular assays. Appear to authority fallacy. Yes!!! I was hoping someone would call me on this! Naturally I cannot provide detailed evidence of my stature in the academic realm due to the political climate and the forum on which we are debating. I implore every reader to trust my arguments on those arguments' merits alone. I'll respond to the other r… | /r/TheRedPill | 08/09/17 04:04 PM |
| 1 | No, Plastics Are Not Lowering Your Testosterone Levels - Real Science Explained InsideI understand and respect your viewpoint but I feel I must clarify- I'm simply stating that I have not seen sufficient evidence of a effect on the human level. If evidence is provided I am ready to modify my post and torch some university buildings. We can debate the ethics of companies saving a buck at the potential cost of consumer health and how the free market and general education can combat this, but I feel that that discussion belongs in a different post. | /r/TheRedPill | 08/09/17 04:01 PM |
| 3 | No, Plastics Are Not Lowering Your Testosterone Levels - Real Science Explained InsideI think this post has tremendous value and of I could sticky it I would. Thanks for the input and I hope everyone takes the time to do some research on prolonged sitting, posture, cortisol, exercise, and T levels. | /r/TheRedPill | 08/09/17 03:50 PM |
| 66 | No, Plastics Are Not Lowering Your Testosterone Levels - Real Science Explained InsideThank you for the integrity and intellectual honesty you've shown in this reply. Skimming papers and jumping to conclusions is all too easy, and any scientifically minded person who claims to never have done it is lying. I look forward to discussing the literature with you and others in the future. | /r/TheRedPill | 08/09/17 03:46 PM |
| 6 | No, Plastics Are Not Lowering Your Testosterone Levels - Real Science Explained InsideThank you for citing your sources I will take a look after work. Please note that I am NOT claiming that plasticizers do not have the capability to do harm in vivo. I am claimimg that ths original evidence presented was insufficient to support thay claim. This is why the thesis of my post is essentially, "show me the data". My post was more concerned with scientific skepticism and intellectual honesty than this issue in particular. Thanks for your thoughtful input friend. Edit: Ok let's take a l… | /r/TheRedPill | 08/09/17 02:08 PM |
| 12 | No, Plastics Are Not Lowering Your Testosterone Levels - Real Science Explained InsideYou're absolutely right, and I appreciate you digging up more sources. This is an ongoing debate and will be on going for a while. | /r/TheRedPill | 08/09/17 02:03 PM |
| 31 | No, Plastics Are Not Lowering Your Testosterone Levels - Real Science Explained InsideIt's good to see that you and a few others represented voices of reason and skepticism in the original. | /r/TheRedPill | 08/09/17 07:49 AM |
| 5 | No, Plastics Are Not Lowering Your Testosterone Levels - Real Science Explained InsideThe evidence is clear that some plasticizer compounds do indeed exhibit xenoestrogenic properties, at least in vitro. Where i become skeptical is claims of macro-scale physiological effects in the general population as a result of those compounds use in consumer goods. What's most important to note is the concentrations at which effects begin to manifest, and the specifics of those effects. For instance, how does the binding affinity of estrogen-mimicking compounds to the androgen receptor compa… | /r/TheRedPill | 08/09/17 07:43 AM |
| 7 | No, Plastics Are Not Lowering Your Testosterone Levels - Real Science Explained InsideDamn I knew those gloves were pink for a reason. It was right in front of my eyes the whole time! | /r/TheRedPill | 08/09/17 07:08 AM |
| 6 | No, Plastics Are Not Lowering Your Testosterone Levels - Real Science Explained InsideIf mind control were that simple I'd think academics could find a way to make more money! | /r/TheRedPill | 08/09/17 06:41 AM |
| 1 | FR: WTFAbsolutely, capacity for violence = reproductive fitness and protection, although it goes beyond that. In addition, the ability to act out violence is: A marked way of imposing your will on reality, and A archetypal behavior associated with physical domiance over other men & masculine identity. (Violence is almost always present in the hero myth). Also, your stripper story illustrates the masculine polarity associated with violence, as well as a masterful handling of that particular situation. | /r/TheRedPill | 08/09/17 02:16 AM |
| 7 | If you want to write about an uncontrollable feature about yourself, write about how to either minimize its setbacks or how to maximize its returns. Do not post it otherwise.Love the advice you offer here. Great post my dude. Really cannot stress the importance of posture enough, and that includes doing back work like deadlifts if possible. People do notice. I've gotten more compliments on posture than most other features. When standing and talking in a group, you cannot speak at the same volume as everyone else. This speaks to me on a personal level. It takes years to not only speak loud enough, but also be able to hear people consistently in noisy environments. If… | /r/TheRedPill | 07/09/17 01:54 AM |
| 14 | Being a tall guy, let me tell you that height is not as important as everyone wants it to beMy altruism knows no bounds- I sacrificed my internet points for a good laugh and I'll tell you what... id do it again. | /r/TheRedPill | 06/09/17 10:45 PM |
| 1 | Why Happy People Cheat a.k.a Hamstering Season 2017 Episode 247Right on, I agree. It's all about her perception rather than the reality. | /r/TheRedPill | 06/09/17 08:51 PM |
| 10 | Why Happy People Cheat a.k.a Hamstering Season 2017 Episode 247I liked your post and the takeaway that a little dark triad goes a long way in LTRs but I would argue that due to this woman's behavior the husband probably skews much further towards 80 BB/20 AF. I think the important thing to note is that she can't even admit it to herself. | /r/TheRedPill | 06/09/17 08:30 PM |
| 5 | Why Happy People Cheat a.k.a Hamstering Season 2017 Episode 247the article states her husband is good looking, makes money presumably does all kinds of "Chad" shit. but her Chad is a truck driver. I think the point the OP is making is that the woman says her husband is a chad due to cognitive dissonance or an inability to reconcile an unconscious disgust with BB behavior. | /r/TheRedPill | 06/09/17 08:26 PM |
| 4 | Do not assume in a LTR. Know all you can.Take any necessary steps to know all you can about the person you’re with. Even if it means going through her phone. This advice is disguising insecurity and inability to live with the unknown as pragmaticism. Sexual strategy is amoral but this is ridiculously try hard. Vet, thoroughly before you LTR and keep an eye on mutual attraction. There are two different types of people in the world, those who want to know, and those who want to believe. - Friedrich Nietzsche "The true man wants two thing… | /r/TheRedPill | 06/09/17 08:17 PM |
| 6 | Being a tall guy, let me tell you that height is not as important as everyone wants it to beNah dude, 6'4" is actually the cut-off for manlet status now. Even women are taller. | /r/TheRedPill | 06/09/17 08:04 PM |
| 38 | Being a tall guy, let me tell you that height is not as important as everyone wants it to beWomen are shit at spacial logic. If she has tingles, she'll assume you're 8'4 with a 10 inch cock. This, 100%. Obviously height acts as an unconscious contributor, but comparing the relative communicated value of a pretty face vs height is an exercise in futility. If anything OPs post just makes shorter men focus more on their height. Men focus on how they can exercise their wills to optimize their experience of reality, not on unchangeable metrics. | /r/TheRedPill | 06/09/17 08:03 PM |
| 2 | "After this there's no turning back"What this means is your joy must come from things other than the "juicy steak" or from popularity. This is the ultimate end game and when we ascribe happiness or "success" to an abstraction such as: "when I get the girl everything will be perfect!", we do ourselves a disservice. Ultimately lasting joy will never come from "getting" anything. Not sure if neo agrees here but in my experience joy and fulfillment comes as a product of successful competition in a meritocracy. It comes from feedback a… | /r/TheRedPill | 05/09/17 04:04 PM |
| 3 | "After this there's no turning back"I will accept that women will not love me as I want to be loved. I will accept that I am the only one that can bring meaning to my life and that this meaning will be defined by me. This is one of the hardest pills to swallow- The only woman who will love you unconditonally is your mother. It might help you to see the positive side if you reframe it like this though- The reality is that the sexual marketplace is a meritocracy, and a hypercompetitive one at that. Meritocracies are beneficial only … | /r/TheRedPill | 05/09/17 03:56 PM |
| 2 | Pet Theories and New/Unfinished Ideas Megathread September 04As far as quirks go you really need to think about it in terms of a woman's confirmation bias. If she's already interested your quirks will be "cute". It has nothing to do with the quirk itself, but rather her tendency to avoid the cognitive dissonance that comes with noting flaws in someone she's already invested in and of course, noting the positive attributes of less attractive men. I think you hit the nail on the head in your summary at the end there. They like the CONFIDENCE afforded to the… | /r/TheRedPill | 05/09/17 05:27 AM |
| 2 | Band of BrothersHypergamy has been balanced since our emergence as a species- far before religion, much less monotheistic religion. Before culture, limits resulted from natural barriers such as tribe size (access to high quality males), and resource scarcity (you're only going to reproduce with someone who can feed you). | /r/TheRedPill | 05/09/17 05:15 AM |
| 3 | Band of Brothers. I certainly don't know any women who are happy with the BB they ended up with. Ah, but that's because they failed to lock down AF It needs to be said that evolution's "goal" is not happiness, and using women's happiness as a metric of fitness or sexual strategy viability is not a good idea. If that was the case then women would not rate, on average, significantly higher in neuroticism than men. Once females age past their reproductive and nurturing prime nature couldn't give less of a shit if … | /r/TheRedPill | 05/09/17 05:07 AM |
| 1 | Imitation and The Way of MenLove your criticism that each post should target a single insight and expound it thoroughly. Will certainly put this advice into action. Thank you. | /r/TheRedPill | 04/09/17 06:31 PM |
| 3 | Imitation and The Way of MenThank you for the respectful and insightful feedback. I feel that my thesis was well defined but certainly agree that it was almost lost in a maze of other abstractions that may have been unnecessary or better suited to their own posts. | /r/TheRedPill | 04/09/17 06:28 PM |
| 1 | Imitation and The Way of MenThis post made me laugh because you really summed up my main thesis in a more effective and concise way that I currently have the ability to. Thank you for the comment & feedback. | /r/TheRedPill | 04/09/17 06:22 PM |
| 3 | A Paradigm For Overcoming Procrastination and Utilizing Discipline EffectivelyIt always seems a bit funny to me- We dread the task so much but once we make even the smallest start it becomes simple to carry on. Often times the dreading is far worse than the doing. Thanks for the anecdote and as a side note the magazine publishing sphere sounds like an interesting field. I hope this framework helps you out. | /r/TheRedPill | 21/06/17 05:58 PM |
| 2 | A Paradigm For Overcoming Procrastination and Utilizing Discipline EffectivelyThe idea of the 'bait' is really just the conscious recognition of impending gratification or reward upon completing a task. Healthy baits are unique to each person but some that i have used include short meditation sessions after stressful business, an hour of reading after making progress on one of my hobbies, or a diet soft drink after a particularly grueling lifting session. Remember- the bait is just an idea that let's you take the first step. Once you've begun the task you will likely have… | /r/TheRedPill | 21/06/17 05:55 PM |
| 3 | "That Stare." Valentine's Day edition.I would agree if he was doing it with the intention to fuck her. Taking ownership over the situations around you is not a beta behavior. Letting yourself be consumed by bitterness, on the other hand... | /r/TheRedPill | 15/02/17 08:28 PM |
| 1 | How do some of us manage not to give up?Right on. To follow-up, OP: you cite your knowledge of everything covered in, for instance, the 'getting laid like a warlord' post, but I don't think you've internalized it. You may understand that you need to approach and have good posture and be sure of yourself etc. but are you actually implimenting the tools avaliable to you? Moreover, Are you focusing on offering value to those around you through your masculine polarity? Or are you so stifled and caught in your own head that you're unable t… | /r/TheRedPill | 06/12/16 03:18 PM |
| 3 | The Importance of Turning off your MindI've also noticed that putting yourself into autopilot seems to produce better results in most circumstances. I think a major contributor to this effect is allowing yourself to stay present. When you aren't stuck in your head trying to focus on every aspect of game you can turn your attention to the interaction and I typically find myself to be much quicker and cheekier in those present moments. The whole concept is a bit like missing the forest for the theoretical trees. RSD has quite a bit of … | /r/TheRedPill | 28/11/16 03:36 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter