TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Ipoopbabiez Archive

View 0 posts and 28 comments by Ipoopbabiez on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
6

Lol wtf is this Facebook tier bullshit
/r/PussyPass06/08/18 10:07 PM
2

Yeah I get really annoyed when someone says that it's just pseudoscience, when really they're the ones being unscientific
/r/MensRights12/06/18 12:47 PM
8

This is going the same way that people treated the Cosby allegations. You all are throwing everything out the window just because Morgan Freeman has played a part in all of our lives. You don't think these women know that they're going to get shit on for everybody for saying these things against Freeman? Now, I still respect him, sexual harassment and misconduct are bad but they're not on the same levels of rape or anything of the like. But nobody is immune to this
/r/PussyPass25/05/18 01:09 PM
2

FYI, those aren't citations in terms of evidence of reality. They are statements of opinion by professional bodies. They don't carry zero weight, but they are far from being 'the word of god', either - I just happen to disagree with them. If you actually read them, they're going through a ton of objective points (such as transitioning being the best method to fixing problems, for example), citing a ton of research to prove it (such as, for that example: Brown G R: A review of clinical approaches…
/r/MensRights20/04/18 06:38 AM
-2

Holy shit, and you're part of the people that complain about liberals crying "my feewies!" You're a fucking snowflake. You don't care about any actual evidence for anything, and if you do, you just dismiss it as a fabrication by the democrats to turn the world against white men. What's the difference between you and an sjw that blames all evidence they don't like as being a fabrication by the patriarchy to go against women and minorities? Absolutely nothing but the scapegoat. You don't even prov…
/r/MensRights19/04/18 05:51 PM
1

Ok, So it was a bad analogy. Regardless, you still don't have the authority to classify someone as being mentally ill, crazy, or whatever. It's more complex than just saying "hey, that person does something abnormal, they must be crazy!" Come back when you're an accredited psychologist.
/r/MensRights19/04/18 05:23 PM
0

Did you misread what I said? It's not psychologically considered a mental illness nor a mental disorder
/r/MensRights19/04/18 05:12 PM
2

Except it was explicitly stated in the quote that I gave that it wasn't just for political reasons, and that it was because it was "more appropriate and consistent with familiar clinical sexology terminology"
/r/MensRights19/04/18 05:01 PM
1

That doesn't change anything I am saying. It still declares that it was changed to gender dysphoria from gender identity disorder because calling it a disorder is scientifically outdated. So from this, we know that being gender non conforming or transgender is not a mental disorder, and we know that gender dysphoria is not in itself a mental disorder.
/r/MensRights19/04/18 04:40 PM
-3

Being a chef as it is to a psychologist is not anywhere close to eating food as it is to defining a mental disorder. Defining what is or isn't a mental disorder is closer to cooking a finely made meal at a fancy restaurant. If you think you can do it without any qualifications in the slightest, you're going to do it very wrong.
/r/MensRights19/04/18 04:27 PM
0

It is. And guess what its position on it is? It is important to note that gender nonconformity is not in itself a mental disorder. The critical element of gender dys- phoria is the presence of clinically significant distress associated with the condition. Replacing “disorder” with “dysphoria” in the diagnostic label is not only more appropriate and consistent with familiar clinical sexology terminology, it also removes the connotation that the patient is “disordered.”
/r/MensRights19/04/18 04:19 PM
-1

what they published Again. The DSM, aka, what defines mental disorders for the United States, no longer considers it a mental disorder. You're not going off what they have recently published; you're going off of outdated material that was changed for a reason. You don't know Jack shit about psychology, and you need to stop pretending the opinions of your pseudo intellectual ass matter more than professionals'.
/r/MensRights19/04/18 04:08 PM
-15

Lmao I'm sure you know more about what constitutes a mental disorder than almost all accreditted psychologists
/r/MensRights19/04/18 04:02 PM
0

Gender is not the same as sex
/r/MensRights19/04/18 03:37 PM
-29

Neither transgenderism nor gender dysphoria is defined as a mental disorder in the current DSM
/r/MensRights19/04/18 03:33 PM
2

unironically using the word "Hitlery" People actually believe this. Anyways, first of all, cut the crap. You spread the lie that Hillary wanted to take away all prison for women, but oh, of course go in and just try to dodge that you did that and didn't even read the article. And even if you did read the article, you clearly didn't read it well. She says: "we need to promote alternatives to incarceration, particularly for nonviolent and first-time offenders, so families aren't broken up." But oh…
/r/MensRights25/12/17 02:53 AM
-1

Ok, what the fuck has hillary said that is worse than accusing your opponent of directly founding isis? What has hillary said that is worse than accusing your opponent of assassinating John F Kennedy? What has hillary said that is worse than saying you got fucked in the ass by Obama? What has hillary said that is worse than bragging about molesting people? Are you actually that fucking dense and ignorant that you think HRC has a fowler mouth than Trump? And no, my God, it hasn't come to just tha…
/r/MensRights24/12/17 09:01 PM
0

See, but you're assuming shit. She never once said that men don't have unique needs as well as women, or that the "unique needs" are special to women. It's a biological and psychological fact that men and women work completely differently, and what would be best at rehabitaliting/punishing women would be different than what would be best at rehabitaliting/punishing men. Also, yeah, sure, Hillary wasn't diplomatically in good terms with russia, and would have risked war with Putin. However, despi…
/r/MensRights24/12/17 07:34 PM
-1

There is literally nothing in that article that even suggests women receiving no prison sentence would be favored by Hillary Clinton. The closest thing she says is that the prison system should "be more attentive to women's unique needs while they are incarcerated". Unless you assume a lot of shit, there is nothing sexist about that. Men have unique needs, and so do women. Is that not a common fact? You can't even say she only mentions helping women, and so that would make her sexist (even if sh…
/r/MensRights24/12/17 03:49 PM
1

Again. I understand that the campaigns were ran to win electoral college votes. What I was saying is that our system of the electoral college is not necessarily a democratic one. That's why I brought up to the other guy that an electoral college victory does not necessarily make a democratic victory. That's why I brought up that Trump lost the plurality of the votes by 3 million.
/r/MensRights21/10/17 07:12 PM
1

Yes, I'm aware of the fucking electoral college. I'm talking about what should be, not what is
/r/MensRights21/10/17 06:43 PM
-5

Was that in reference to the electoral college? If so, that was a terrible analogy. For one, I'm not even saying he lost. I'm saying he won - that's obvious - but not by means of a democratic election. By definition, he wasn't democratically elected, as he lost the plurality of the votes by several million. Two, comparing a democratic election to how you win at chess is stupid. Being successful in chess involves taking out the opponent's king. Being successful in chess does not at all involve wh…
/r/MensRights21/10/17 02:05 PM
9

I mean Hitler was against communism and animal abuse
/r/MensRights21/10/17 10:10 AM
-17

First of all, in terms of being "democratically elected", Trump lost the popular vote by 3 million. Second of all, you actually think Clinton would have been worse than Donald Trump? I don't think she was the best candidate, but every scandal dished on her can be applied to Trump in some form or another. And she was actually competent, economically literate, and not a God awful speaker. I'm not going to say Clinton didn't lie about anything, but almost 70% of what comes out of Trump's mouth is b…
/r/MensRights21/10/17 10:06 AM
3

I kind of took Google's decision as not really being about the argument itself. The argument was reasonable and did make good points. What made Google fire him, however, was having the company (presumably unwillingly) represent a controversial stance. You cannot deny that discussing biological differences between men and women is bound to be controversial, and holding the stance that they are is not good for the company. As such, I would not get pissed off at Google, but more at society itself
/r/TheRedPill08/08/17 04:02 PM
2

Ok, what the fuck Washington Post? Do they always post fucking garbage like this?
/r/MensRights21/05/17 01:58 AM
0

Okay I hate HRC as much as the next guy, but come on. This is a low effort shitpost, and everyone who upvoted it should be ashamed of themselves.
/r/PussyPass10/10/16 02:42 PM
3

They have pretty decent trading charts
/r/MensRights08/10/16 05:45 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter